Tag Archives: Christianity

Zionist – Freemasonic – Jesuit Agendas in Conflict or Superposition: End Times’ Sequence & Trajectories

Shrewd commentators, who oppose present world’s negative developments and nature, find* that, within the context of divided Christianity, “healing the schism would be great”, and that there are “forces trying to bring the two churches together” (Catholic & Orthodox).

 

However, they also observe that, on the other hand, other projects, like the notorious, Kalergi plan and the ongoing Islamist immigration, truly gain momentum. Finding the two trends opposite to one another, they ask “why would Rome lay down to this?”.

 

Christian Reunification, Kalergi Plan, Mass Immigration, Europe’s Islamization – Zionists, Freemasons, Jesuits

 

The present article explains why the two, seemingly opposite, spirals and dynamics correspond to either different agendas or different agendas’ chapters and serve diverse trajectories, without truly being opposite to one another.

 

Indeed, it makes no sense for the European Christian churches (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox) to reunite together, if one accepts to be overridden by the Islamization process. However, at this point, there are at work different projects and trajectories that are promoted by opposite forces, without however being frontally opposite to one another.

 

I. Anti-Messianic, Anti-Eschatological Freemasons: the Apostate Lodge

 

You know that the ‘elite’ is not one, but divided into Jesuits, Freemasons, and Zionists and each group has its centuries-old (or rather millennia-long) agenda. In addition, there are internal factions, which also pursue divergent agendas; in other words, these internal splits and factions do not exist for any other reason except agenda differentiation.

 

The main forces involved and their different agendas reveal automatically the existence of diverse eschatological/messianic plans or the absence / rejection thereof. (The latter is also to be reckoned with.)

 

The atheistic lodge Grand Orient de France (this is the bulk of the Scottish / French rite in France: it controls Le Droit Humain lodges and it is engaged in fierce fighting against the Grande Loge Nationale Francaise, which is an English rite outfit in France) not only does not promote eschatological / messianic plans, but also opposes all existing ones, be they Freemasonic, Jesuit or Zionist of origin/nature.

 

II. Schism within Ashkenazi, pseudo-Jewish, Khazarian Zionism

 

When I was in Israel (1984-1985) during my postgraduate studies (Egyptology / Assyriology), I came upon a Zionist branch that was also anti-eschatological and anti-messianic. What did they teach / propagate in their seminars? That the Messiah had already come, that ‘he’ is Eretz (the state of) Israel, and that we therefore live in the messianic times, when the Messiah (Israel) will progressively outshine the rest of the world (the Goyim).

 

So, it is only normal for that Zionist branch to cooperate with Grand Orient de France and with other similar forces (within the Zionist universe and outside of it) in order to promote stability and permanence of the Post WW II world. (By the way, the Clintons belong to this faction, contrarily to Netanyahu.)

 

The aforementioned two cases are only examples.

 

The Greater Israel plan is then not necessarily supported by all Zionist groups, because any plan linked to a personal Messiah would be rejected by the Zionists who identify the Messiah with the state of Israel itself.

 

However, I would say that today the mainstream Zionist world backs the Greater Israel plan; they associate a person with it; they prepare the erection of the Third Temple; some even say in public that they have identified who the future King of Israel is. Few boast having met him in person! And others try to conceal that they have truly come face to face with that atrocious creature. This Zionist plan entails various global developments and the rise of a sizeable Israel (from Euphrates to the Nile) to global prominence.

 

Before explaining what this can eventually mean, I would say that opposite eschatological / messianic plans (those of the Freemasons, of the Jesuits, and eventually of others) may

a. either be in direct opposition with the aforementioned (‘mainstream’) Zionist plan

b. or move on different trajectories that follow different time perspectives (what we would define as ‘short-run’, ‘mid-run’, long-run’).

 

This means that the force that promotes a long-run plan can eventually, under some conditions, and within some limits, may consent to a short-term plan, even if it from the first sight looks extremely opposite to the long-run plan. They may even use it – and this, I believe, is the true nature of the present Jesuit-Zionist alliance; that’s why Francis I avoids criticizing homosexuality, etc., etc., etc. These are minor and trivial points, if compared to the foremost geopolitical-eschatological plans of the Jesuit Order.

 

III. Each eschatological/messianic agenda involves also a different Messiah

 

Most people believe that ‘the elite’ wants to prepare the necessary conditions for their (fake) Messiah/Christ, who will be the long awaited Antichrist. This is very wrong; in fact, there will be many false Christs (pseudo-Christs) and only the last and more powerful one will be the Antichrist (the one mentioned in the Book of Revelation, and in Daniel). This is also consistent with Jesus’ prophecy or description of End times’ stages, namely the statement that ‘many’ will come pretending they are the Christ/Messiah.

 

I don’t believe that only Zionists, Freemasons and Jesuits will come up with their Messiahs, each of them with a different guy. There will be more than just three pseudo-Christs. There will be an Orthodox Russian Christ (at least there is a plan providing for him, elaborated among some independent circles in Russia); there will be at least two Mahdis (a Shia and a Sunni); there will be a Parsist Shosyant, and many other religions’ or sects’ expected messianic figures will appear too. This makes sense, and it only reconfirms Jesus’ words that “nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom” (Mark 13:8 New International Version – NIV).

 

{Key note: I never use KJV by the way – I did crosscheck it with the Greek Septuagint and the Latin Vulgata texts in hundreds of excerpts, and in most of the cases, the meaning of the text was terribly altered to be evidently adapted to Freemasonic concepts. KJV is an untrustworthy forgery and a theological fornication.}

 

The below interpretational diagrams are all wrong and simplistic:

  1. the Zionist Messiah is the Antichrist
  2. the Islamist Mahdi is the Antichrist

(actually no Muslim will believe a Mahdi without a re-appearing Islamic Prophet Jesus, so in that case, one has to expect a tandem or to see fake persons impersonating the roles ascribed to Mahdi and to Jesus as Islamic Prophet)

  1. the Zionist Messiah will eliminate the Islamist Mahdi
  2. the Islamist Mahdi will prevail over the Zionist Messiah

 

IV. A reminiscence of the end times of the Roman Res Publica

 

I believe that, in several successive ‘stages’ of 3.5 or 7 years duration (and this depends on what one considers as ‘stage’), three major circles will be completed.

 

I feel that these circles will be a sort of reminiscence of (or will have some analogy with) the last century of Roman Res Publica, which led to Imperium: Sulla-Cinna-Marius / Crassus-Pompey-Caesar / Marc Antony-Lepidus-Octavian Augustus. The three circles will be as follows.

 

V. Zionist Agenda & the Khazarian Greater Israel

 

Greater IsraelFor this purpose, mainstream Zionists need to ensure:

 

1. the pulverization of several surrounding Middle Eastern states (Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia) by different means, military, socio-political, geotechnical engineering (Egypt can entirely disappear with the quasi-totality of its population within few hours, if a 9.4 Richter earthquake takes place in Aswan and brings down the High Dam).

 

((By the way, the Amhara/Tigray Abyssinians, who control the vast colonial state of ‘Ethiopia’ with numerous subjugated nations that strive for national independence, and who are the allies of the Israeli Khazarian Zionists, have a seven centuries old ‘prophecy’, which became known to Westerners in the late 18th century; according to this ‘vision’, their state at the End Times would share borders – dividing Egypt – with a Jewish state named ‘Israel’ and located in Palestine. When this was published, there was no Zionist Congress!))

 

2. the collapse of Europe – and here fits the Kalergi plan

 

3. the first, small, ‘contained’ nuclear war between Russia and America that will destroy northern parts of European Russia and America’s East Coast

 

Jesuits accept most of this plan, but Freemasons oppose it in various ways. So, Freemasonic endeavors in opposition to the Zionist agenda may involve the following:

 

1. various defense lines against terrorists in Syria & Iraq; support of Iran (Freemasons have infiltrated extensively the Ayatullah regime)

 

2. the re-emergence of European totalitarianism, spirituality, and imperium

 

3. the preparations for the re-establishment of the US as a genuine republican state (as conceived by the Founding Fathers) in a small part of today’s US territory, mainly in the mountainous parts of the Middle West.

 

For Greater Israel to be truly a global power, there have to take place two different types of development:

a. Israel must expand territorially while major countries of the region have to disappear

and

b. Europe, Russia and America have to be pulled into an abysmal maelstrom of destruction, contraction, and insignificance

 

It seems there are two diverse options for Russia’s & America’s contraction, one being the aforementioned, ‘contained’ nuclear war, and the other involving

 

i. extraordinary natural disasters occurring in both, the eastern and the western extremities of the US and

 

ii. ‘color revolution’ against Kremlin.

 

In any case, great importance is given so that the area around Samara, Astrakhan, and the northern shores of the Caspian Sea is always protected.

 

The reason for this is that the local population in that region is not Russian, truly speaking, but Khazarian; there lies the epicenter of the Zionist Khazarian conspiracy.

 

Naive commentators, who express doubts about the veracity of the Greater Israel agenda, ask how Israel with its present, limited population can occupy vast lands of Syria, Iraq, Jordan, NW Saudi Arabia, and Egypt that are today inhabited by more than 100 million people!

 

Those commentators don’t know that a second ‘aliyah’ can take place (like that of the year 1945-1948) and 15-20 million ‘hidden’ ‘Jews’ (in reality: Khazarians presently impersonating Russians) can move to live in the Saudi Red Sea coast north of Jeddah, in the Egyptian Red Sea coast, in Sinai and in the Syrian desert. To support this enormous movement, the vast know-how currently acquired in the Zionist Emirates (UAE) will be transferred to the said territories in order to turn the desert into a green land.

 

As per the terms of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance, the Catholic Church can transfer the Holy See to Jerusalem, if (or when) Rome, Italy and Europe collapse in anarchy, Euro-Islamist wars (I don’t call them civil wars, because Islamist immigrants are alien elements in Europe), and total chaos. This perspective is viewed as inevitable by the Jesuits – and actually by all. And by evidently contributing to Europe’s decomposition, the Jesuits only demonstrate their solidarity with the Zionists, whom they surely cheat superbly as regards the final stages of the Jesuit agenda.

 

So, the plan to unite all churches has a global appeal, whereas local level socio-economic-political-cultural-spiritual power across Europe seems to be of little interest for the Jesuits. This is not strange:

 

first, their main focus is elsewhere, and

 

second, the Jesuits know that, after Europe’s descent to disorder and chaos, the power that will rise will be Freemasonic or if you prefer Nordic-Germanic, Gnostic, Hermetic, Wagnerian, Arian (the early Christian heresy) or ‘pagan’.

 

Use whatever word you want, but it will be an anti-Catholic, anti-Orthodox, anti-Jesuit Christianity with references to Merovingian bloodline and other extra-Christian literature.

 

VI. The Rise of the New Roman (European) Empire

 

For this purpose, Freemasons need to ensure:

 

1. A low degree destruction in the Middle East, which will also involve the following:

– preservation of Iran,

– creation of ‘Kurdistan’ on only Iraqi, Syrian and Turkish territories,

– formation of a Sunni central Iraqi state,

– emergence of a Shia state in South Iraq and the NE confines of Saudi Arabia (Dammam), and

– expansion of Jordan across NW quarter of Saudi Arabia

 

2. a. the total destruction of all democratic concepts and ideas in Europe, the formation of military groups that, after the fight against and the elimination of the Islamists, will rise to absolute power and impose a Freemasonic, pseudo-Christian, European Imperial state that will look closer to Mithraic Iranian Arsacid Empire, to Gnostic-Hermetic Christianity, and to Hyperborean cults and traditions.

 

2. b. During the forthcoming chaos across Europe, the Freemasons will spearhead the destruction of Rome and the conversion of most of the Christian churches in Western, Central and Northern Europe into pseudo-Christian Freemasonic temples. So, at that stage, the tactical interests of the Freemasons and the Zionists will converge again.

 

Another factor related to the destruction of Rome, which can also explain why the Jesuits seem indifferent to this forthcoming event, is the perplex phenomenon of the Fatima apocalyptic visions (six apparitions from 13th May to 13th October 1917) and the associated Miracle of Sun. In spite of the terrible measures taken to prevent the diffusion of the truth and despite the enormous volumes of lies spread on this subject by the official Catholic Church in order to confuse and disorient every concerned explorer, many came to know that the Fatima apocalyptic visions do actually concern the end of the Catholic Church as we have known it until now.

 

So, I conclude that the Jesuits realized (particularly after the end of WW II) that the overall sociopolitical and cultural developments across Europe would make Traditional Catholic and Protestant Christianity irrevocably unsustainable in Rome, Italy & Europe, and they therefore shaped their End Times plans accordingly.

 

3. the decadence of Russia (options of ‘color revolution’ or other type of turmoil are under discussion, but not the ‘contained’ nuclear war option) and the implosion of the US (following economic collapse rather than natural disaster, although Freemasons too seem to believe that some type of East Coast natural disaster is inevitable). Following the collapse of central authority (or the submersion of Washington D.C. or the destruction caused by the limited and ‘contained’ nuclear war), the different parts of the elite will live in underground cities or secluded territories. Then, vast lands of today’s American territory will plunge in chaos and they will be ruled by local thugs and gangsters. However, some form of republican state with public order and discipline will emerge in the mountainous parts of the American Middle West.

 

The New Roman-European Empire will be a totalitarian state compared to which Hitler’s Germany would look like a liberal-anarchical spot. To its citizens, it will be a very happy realm, because practically speaking the outright majority of the indigenous European population, previously outraged because of the Islamists’ unprecedented barbarism, will support the anti-Islamist and anti-Jewish resistance, struggle, and victory of the brave European fighters.

 

The end result will be that they will get rid of all troubles, because the great warriors will exterminate all Islamists, Jews (Sephardic or Ashkenazi Khazarians), leftists, homosexuals, liberal-socialists, and other dissident elements. To imagine how terrible the next European war will be, one must consider approximately 50 million people dead from the borders of Russia to the Atlantic in a period of 3-4 years; some cities will surely look worse than Syria’s Aleppo.

 

However, this shocking situation will bring forth splendid results: materialism, consumerism, hedonism and pacifism will have disappeared – along with humanism. The era that started with Copernicus will have ended in Europe. The imperial rise will be very fast, because spiritual powers, techniques, and endeavors will be pursued, and demonic hierarchies will highly contribute to the restoration of the Anti-(Pseudo-)Christian order and authority. A new technology will appear that will be spiritual rather than material of nature. Europe will then believe in  forms of Mithraism, Gnostic Christianity, and Arianism that were thought to have been irreversibly uprooted back in the 4th century.

 

The rise of the European Empire will be simultaneous with the fall of Greater Israel and the final disarray of the Muslim World from Mauritania to India. With America’s, Russia’s, India’s, and Israel’s power decreasing, the purified European Empire will be a meteoric phenomenon and the leader of the struggle against the Islamist immigrants and the erratic Jews will be catapulted to absolute power. This person will be very different from the common, materialistic leaders and fake Messiahs of the Zionists and the Muslims.

 

Europe’s power will spread across Africa, Latin America, and large parts of Asia. Islam will be abolished, and for some time it will look as if it totally disappeared. Israel will disintegrate, and a peace will be imposed among local populations of different backgrounds as the only means to survive; the real Third Temple will be built then, because the earlier built Zionist edifice will be a fake replica. The Third Temple will be indeed Satan’s temple par excellence. The European Emperor will first be called divine (in imitation of Ancient Roman titulary) and then worshipped as god. He will be the Final False Christ, the ‘Antichrist’.

 

This will be an era of major natural disasters and several parts of the Earth will disappear following catastrophic earthquakes, enormous tsunamis, and calamitous sidereal phenomena. It will also be a time a nefarious diseases rapidly spread across vast territories and with many hundreds of millions of dead (“He will destroy many in a time of peace”). The Zionists will have almost disappeared, but this will not be the same for the Jesuits.

 

It goes without saying that Official Christianity either Roman Catholic or Eastern Roman Orthodox will be persecuted and uprooted as Satanic heresy across the European Empire.

999.jpg

VII. Jesuit Christianity and its Survival at the times of the European Empire

 

Where will the main center of the Jesuits be located at those days? In the countries toward which their focus has already shifted, but the world’s media -deliberately or due to oversight- ignore this remarkable change.

 

In fact, the brief and straight answer to the original question (as expressed in the second paragraph of this article) is this:

After the end of WW II, the Jesuits have concluded that

a. Europe is definitely rotten

b. Christianity in Europe is irreversibly dead

c. their power in Europe will never ever rise again

d. Europe will be controlled either by Freemasons or Zionists to its end

e. it makes therefore no sense to Jesuits to oppose the Zionist agenda in Europe, since even if they achieve to avert it, their power will not increase, and at the end the Anti-Christian Freemasons will prevail.

f. at the present moment, because of the aforementioned, and despite the Freemasonic interest in setting up an immense empire headquartered somewhere in Central-Northern Europe, it looks like all three major secret societies, Freemasonry, Societas Jesu, and the Zionist Khazarians, want to see the present European structure destroyed – each for different reasons.

 

(((This does not mean that their puppets – Freemason Holland, Zionist Sarkozy, Jesuit Fillon, Jesuits Anthony Blair and Theresa May, Freemasons Gordon Brown & David Cameron, Freemasons Francois Mitterrand, Helmut Kohl, and Jacques Chirac, Jesuit Angela Merkel, and others – want to truly and consciously destroy their homeland, as many people may imagine mistakenly. All the statesmen and politicians, who belong to today’s European political microcosm, believe that they contribute to the improvement of the socioeconomic conditions and to the elimination of the major problems. This is the result a. of the nature of our world, b. of the overwhelming deception that applies across the board and at all levels, and c. of the function of the three secret and hierarchical societies to which all these persons belong. The initiation to another, higher degree always means partly rejection of earlier beliefs, assumptions and understandings; or to put it otherwise, these secret societies’ superior members always keep the lower members misinformed or uninformed.)))

 

g. consequently, the Jesuits – already before many decades – knew that they had to put all their stakes on one (or more) strong, ancient, coherent, yet politically deceived and disoriented nation that had not yet been Christened. You certainly understand immediately that I mean China.

 

Today, in South Korea, all Christian denominations total around 30-35% among the indigenous people. In Japan, a great part of folk Shinto lean to various branches of Christianity. The same occurs in Taiwan where many non-religious people turn to different Christian churches. More importantly, in China, Buddhists total 18%, Christians are around 5%, and the unaffiliated make more than half the population, with many converting to Christianity every day.

 

These countries are the main focus of the Jesuits; they expect a great return to religion and spirituality when an economic collapse will bring despair to the outright majority of the population in all these countries. When bloody conflicts and devastating wars, nightmarish diseases, ominous famines, and unique natural disasters will be hitting the rest of the world, China will rise as the Christian country par excellence.

 

That’s why the Freemasons try to compromise this perspective by deliberately contributing to the worsening of the relations between North Korea and South Korea, and to the degradation of the relations between China and the US, so that if there has to be a limited, ‘contained’ nuclear war, this takes place between China and the US, and not between Russia and the US. That’s why we hear rumors of wars coming from one or the other side of the Eurasiatic landmass.

 

VIII. The demise of the Anti-Christian Roman Empire

 

For this purpose, Jesuits need to ensure:  

1. the advance of the Zionist agenda in the Middle East

 2. the advance of the Zionist and the Freemasonic agendas in Europe

 3. the mutual regression of Russia and America

 4. the successful rise of the European Empire under the Antichrist; in the first part of his rule, they will not oppose / challenge him. They expect the Two Prophets to appear as soon as he has the Third Temple erected, and then they will start opposing him.

 

Jesuits know very well that it is their own task to prepare a Chinese army of 200 million soldiers and turn it against the European Emperor – Antichrist, when he will encircle China and East Asia from all parts. They expect that moment to come with the end of the Two Prophets’ ministry and Jesus’ Second Coming. But this is wrong and, although they play their game at the long-run and they are therefore superior to the rest, they will only cheat themselves. Their end will be even more spectacular.

 

Now, who Jesus will be, how he will first appear, how he will engulf his enemies into their own traps, who will stand by him, who will oppose -and how- the Antichrist, this is another, very vast, topic.

 

However, the idea of just a frontal battle between two persons is really childish and inconsistent with the Christian texts to say the least. By this, I don’t limit the topic to just few false Christs, the Antichrist, the False Prophet, the Two Prophets, and Jesus.

 

There will also be many other persons who will play a very important role. Already the Book of the Revelation (ch. 14) speaks of two different persons: the Lamb and the 144000 virgin soldiers (verses 1-5) and the End times King, someone “like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head”, who will eliminate the sinful and the evil (verses 14-19). Believing that the two persons are one is sheer distortion, and this confusion has been spread by many theologians related to all three aforementioned secret societies.

 

The number of important persons expected to appear at the End of Times is not limited in the aforementioned; in Matthew XII, 41-42, Jesus states that, on Judgment Day, Assyrians (“men of Nineveh“) will come back to engage in battle against “this generation(sheer reference to the evil, Maccabee-origin Pharisees whom he rejected).

 

Further on, Jesus mentions an entire southern (Queen of South) nation that will emerge at the same time to also oppose and fight against “this generation”. This nations’ magistrates will also be key persons of the End times.

 

That is to say, most of today interpreters, irrespective of denomination or religion, try to adjust their holy texts to their desires and wishes, be they theological or political, and in the process they strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

 

Now, what the Kalergi plan is, why a Freemason envisioned it, what his intentions were, and in what he was managed and maneuvered without his choosing, this is a totally different topic basically spiritual of nature.

 

However, despite ‘his’ false claims, Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi did not originate from the Eastern Roman nobility; neither the Cretan Kallergis family (of which he was an offspring) did. Many Greeks, who moved to Tsarist Russia in the late 18th and early 19th c., were impressed by, and envied, Russian nobility; so, when they returned to their Ottoman-occupied homeland, they brought with them the myth and the falsely risen claims of Eastern Roman Imperial nobility. Now, whether Richard Nikolaus knew that his family’s claims were fake and unsubstantiated or not, this is anyone’s guess. As a matter of fact, Kallergis family members had risen those claims for at least a century, before Richard Nikolaus was born.

 

 

—————————

Note

* Robert Reyvolt in Incendiary Radio w/ Robert Reyvolt – April 2, 2017 Hour 2 http://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/incendiary-radio-w-robert-reyvolt-april-2-2017-hour-2/

 

 

 

 

Arab Nation Hoax: Geared to Falsify Islamic History & Ruin Varied Nations disfiguratively Named Arab

Arab Nation Hoax: Geared to Falsify Islamic History & Ruin Varied Nations disfiguratively Named Arab

 

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

 

In an earlier article (http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard/Article/There-is-no-Kurdish-Nation—it-is-a-Freemasonic-Colonial–Orientalist-Hoax-/259228), I explained the reasons for which there are no Kurds, and that the notion of a Kurdish nation is a Freemasonic Orientalist hoax geared to put under an impossible umbrella many different nations spanning from Anti-Taurus Mountains to Syria, Mesopotamia and the Zagros Mountains.

 

The Hoax of a Kurdish Nation is not however the first of this kind. The first Orientalist hoax was that of the Arabic Nation. This forgery dates back to the late 18th and the 19th centuries and served as an example in the aforementioned article.

 

– By misinterpreting historical processes,

– by concealing historical evidence,

– by disorienting regional academics from having a wide spectrum understanding of their fields,

by diverting them from several related academic fields and disciplines, and – by machinating in a way to mislead regional universities, faculties of humanities, staff members and researchers and ultimately keep them at an academically underdeveloped level and disconnected from one another,

 

… the colonial academia and diplomats make sure that a vast confusion and deception prevail in the minds of targeted nations only to serve as the wrong foundation for further theoretical, intellectual, ideological and political disorientation.

 

I then briefly expanded on the Arab Nation Hoax, before focusing on the identity, the socio-political milieu, attitude and targets of the diverse nations, which for the needs of the Kurdish Nation Hoax became ‘Kurds’.

 

The revelation of the non-Arab identity of the misfortunate nations that have been labeled ‘Arab’ by the Orientalist forgers triggered the interest of several readers, who wrote to me, because they had heard totally different presentations while studying in different universities in the region. To answer their questions and illuminate the topic more extensively, I decided to come up with a summarizing, yet all-encompassing text which, although unable to fully cover the subject, offers a panoramic view of the fundamental historical realities and their existing dimensions and ramifications.

 

I will therefore first re-publish the part of the previous article which concerned the Arab Nation Hoax, then quote the questions included in the mails that I received, and finally expand properly.

 

  1. Who are those who have been fallaciously labeled ‘Arabs’

The Arabic-speaking part of the populations of Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Western Egypt are indeed Berbers, who gradually forgot Berber languages and spoke Arabic exclusively, because they accepted Islam, and consequently made of their religious language their sole language. This was a long process and the Arabization phenomenon was only of linguistic nature – not ethnic, not cultural.

Similarly, Egyptians are not Arabs, but Hamitic Egyptians or ‘Copts’, if you want, who in different eras accepted Islam and gradually abandoned Coptic language. Egypt south of Assiut was still Christian for almost 300 years after Prophet Muhammad died. Today, there is no ethnic difference between Christian and Muslim Egyptians; literarily speaking, the country is inhabited by Christian Copts and Muslim Copts.

 

In the same way, the ethnic origin of today’s Sudanese is Kushitic (Kushites being a branch of the Hamitic nations) or Nilo-Saharan; Sudan’s Kushites are Arabic-speaking natives, because after accepting Islam, they gradually abandoned Christian Sudan’s Makurian and Alodian Kushitic languages, which were later forms of Meroitic. i.e. the pre-Christian Sudan’s language which was written in hieroglyphic and linear characters. Linguistic Arabization is indeed a very recent phenomenon for Sudan’s Kushites, because the Christian state of Makuria lasted until the 14th c. and the Christian state of Alodia collapsed only in the late 16th c. On the other hand, the Nubians in the North and other Nilo-Saharan peoples in other parts of Sudan preserved however their languages down to our times, as Arabic is merely a religious language to them.

More importantly, the Arabic-speaking part of the populations of SE Turkey, Syria, Iraq, SW Iran, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Emirates and the Saudi extreme North are not Arabs but Aramaeans (a Semitic nation) who gradually forgot their own Syriac Aramaic language (a major language of Patristic Literature and an international language across the land routes of trade between the Mediterranean World, East Africa, India, and China) and spoke Arabic because they accepted Islam. Their linguistic Arabization was a gradual phenomenon characterized by the affinity of the two languages (Syriac Aramaic and Arabic) and the similarity of the two writing systems, as Arabic originates from Syriac Aramaic.

Last but not the least, the Yemenites and the Omanis are not Arabs, but indigenous Yemenites and Omanis who, after accepting Islam, gradually abandoned their pre-Islamic languages, namely Sabaean, Hinyarite and Hadhramawti, etc. and spoke Arabic. Two modern Yemenite indigenous languages, notably Mahri and Socotri, are descendants of the Ancient Yemenite languages that were of course categorized as Semitic. Mahri is spoken in Hadhramawt (Mahra) and in North Somalia, whereas Socotri is the only native language in the island of Socotra.

 

The pre-Islamic Yemenite languages are documented with a great number of epigraphic texts dating to back to more than 1300 years before the arrival of Islam; they were written in the indigenous writing that had nothing to do with the pre-Islamic Arabic writing which appears only 300 years before Islam and is provenly a deformation of Syriac Aramaic.

 

  1. Reactions and questions from readers

 

Simply amazing, dear Dr. Shamsaddin!

 

I am astonished with your deep knowledge of the region and its history of ethnic components. But, as far as I know from the History of the Middle East that we have been taught at Al-Bayt University (Jordan), even before the Islamic expansion (al-futuhat al-islamiyya), some Arabic tribes did come out of Arabian Peninsula to live at the Northern parts, such as Palestine and Jordan. Or, at least, after the Islamic expansion, most of the tribes of Adnan (Northern Arabs) or Madar and Qahtan (Southern Arabs from Yemen) moved to Iraq, Sham and Egypt with the armies and settled there. So, that is one of the reasons why the autochthonous populations were Arabized. 

 

The Qahtan tribes or the Yemenites settled mostly in Iraq, and the Madar tribes inhabited mostly Sham (Levant). And even after their Islamization, these tribes carried with them some of the historic enmity that pre-existed between them and which was revived in the wars between Ali and Mua’wiyyah, and later in the wars between the Umayyad dynasty and the Shia (partisans) of Ali and his successors. This is known in the books of literature and history as the hate or enmity between Ahl al-Sham and Ahl al-Iraq.

 

So, I am little bit perplexed hearing that the Arab populations are hoaxes of Orientalist Freemasons. But, of course, I do not exclude that possibility, because that waste region cannot be homogeneous, especially knowing that it has been always a crossroad of different peoples, kingdoms and civilizations throughout history.

 

 

  1. General Outline of the Response

 

Thank you for your commentary, dear friend! Basically, you make four points.

 

You first speak about subjects of Oriental History taught in a Middle Eastern university. This is addressed here:

  1. I. ABOUT UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN ISLAMIC EXPANSION & ISSUES RELATED TO ARABS

 

You subsequently refer to the wider area of SE Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, and SW Iran before, during and in the aftermath of the Islamic Expansion phenomenon, so basically late 6th and 7th centuries CE. This is discussed here:

  1. II. THE PRESCRIBED, HIDDEN NATION: THE ARAMAEANS

 

  1. III. INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS AND INVADING ARMIES IN THE EARLY ISLAMIC EXPANSION

 

  1. IV. ISLAM: THE CULTURAL ARAMAIZATION OF THE ARABS

 

and

 

  1. V. THE EARLY ISLAMIC INVASIONS: FIRST MISREPRESENTED AND DISFORMED BY THE WESTERN ORIENTALISTS, SECOND USED IDEOLOGICALLY & POLITICALLY BY THE COLONIAL GANGSTERS

 

You then mention Ancient Yemen and the Yemenite migrations. This is answered here:

  1. VI. ANCIENT YEMEN AND ANCIENT ARABIA

 

You finally discuss issues pertaining to homogeneity of the wider region. This is commented here:

  1. VII. HOMOGENEITY vs. HETEROGENEITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST

 

What follows is the main part of my response as per the above structure. Bear in mind, if you please, that this is merely a synopsis.

 

 

  1. The Dimensions of Early Islamic History Falsification by Western Orientalist Academia and the False Concept of Arabization (proper response to readers’ questions)

 

  1. I. ABOUT UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN ISLAMIC EXPANSION & ISSUES RELATED TO ARABS

 

You say “we have been taught at Al-Bayt University (Jordan), even before the Islamic expansion (al-futuhat al-islamiyya), some Arabic tribes “.

 

Within the context of modern academic disciplines, to give an example, there is ‘History of Ancient Egypt’, and there is ‘History of Egyptology’!

 

The history of the modern academic disciplines per se is an important field to also study, if one desires really in-depth understanding. Several stages of knowledge acquisition and synthesis have passed ever since Champollion deciphered Egyptian Hieroglyphics and Rawlinson decoded Assyrian-Babylonian cuneiform. Many mistakes have been corrected in the process; and many alterations have been added! Such fields as History of Assyriology, History of Iranology, History of Indology, History of Islamology, etc. reveal a tremendous amount of insightful as regards how we came to conclude what he have drawn until now as conclusion in each of the aforementioned fields.

 

With the colonial presence active and destructive on Ottoman soil under many different forms, one can easily understand that the Western Orientalism did not reflect a genuine interest for discovery of the past and exploration but soon turned out to be a multi-layered tool against the past, the present and the future of the Orient. In a way, it was a real robbery of the Oriental past, and by this I don’t mean the criminal, illegal and only provisory transportation of Oriental Antiquities in Western museums, libraries, institutes, research centers, universities, palaces, public places, auction houses, and ultimately privately homes. The worst robbery occurred at the theoretical, academic, intellectual, educational and cultural level. The collection of a sizable material record of Oriental Antiquities and its study and interpretation turned soon out to be not a true reflection of the historical past but a false projection of Western concepts, ideas and theories into the past under study. The new academic disciplines of Orientalism, instead of properly and effectively rectify the earlier acquired material record of ‘Classical’ (the term is false) Greco-Roman Antiquities, were only adjusted to it to help it expand.

 

The ensued ‘systematized falsehood’ was not only diffused among the Western countries (due to the phenomenon of academic competition in an era of acute nationalisms) but also enforced in the colonial academic and educational institutions that emerged – with the deep involvement of the colonial Orientalist academia – in all these fake countries. But, by accepting the Western ‘systematized falsehood’, the modern Oriental students and scholars (who were formed under supervision of the Western Orientalists) only gravely undermined the importance of their countries’ past, severely minimized the value of their past in their nation-building process, and finally contributed to the formation of fake modern Oriental nations that are detached from their past and left without a diachronic cultural identity.

 

Here, it is good to remember the French expression ‘bon pour l’ Orient’ (lit. ‘good for the Orient’) which implied that the product under discussion was not to be consumed or used in the Occident (by Westerners – due to its lower quality specifications)! All colonial academic institutions that were setup by Western academia on the soil of Ottoman provinces and in other Oriental lands were not proper copies of the Western universities and did not diffuse the same quality and depth of knowledge. Their Orientalist masters allowed these institutions to teach / diffuse in the Orient only the portion of their knowledge that would not make the Oriental academic institutions able to rival with their own Occidental establishments. Above all, these colonial academic-educational institutions were guided by their Orientalist masters to diffuse academic knowledge altered in a way that it would not be easy for the Oriental students (Algerian, Egyptian, Lebanese, Sudanese, Yemenite, Iraqi, Iranian, Pakistani, Indian, etc.) to realize that the Western ‘systematized falsehood’ – deliberately, viciously, and against all declared Western academic values – diminished the value of the Orient and the achievements of the Oriental civilizations in order to subordinate them to the Western historiography (the values of which – quite contrarily – were extremely maximized to appear as global).

 

Several scholars like Edward Said criticized Orientalism, whereas others like Martin Bernal (in his monumental ‘Black Athena’) attacked the Western ‘systematized falsehood’ at its very epicenter, demonstrating that the ‘Classical’ civilization was subordinated to the Oriental civilizations. But to no avail!

 

In the universities of Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Yemen, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, all the staff members keep promoting – pathetically, idiotically and self-disastrously – the colonial ‘systematized falsehood’ that prevents them from really assessing the greatness of the Orient in its correct dimensions, from truly evaluating the historical truth and continuity of the Orient, and from detecting the detrimental harm that the Western system, which they studied (either in Paris or in Madinah), has done to their own countries, their nation-building process, and their historical heritage.

 

However, the issue is far wider and permeates all disciplines of Humanities.

 

In fact, behind Pan-Arabism (a false theory the beginning of which is retraced back to Jurji Zeydan and his Nahda movement) is hidden the (exported to the respective lands of the Orient) version ‘bon pour l’ Orient’ of the Western discipline of Arabology. But the origin of the Arabic studies in Western universities goes back to the 18th c.! The Western ‘systematized falsehood’ took more than a century to produce Pan-Arabism.

 

One can expand up to writing books and books, but here suffice it to say that the ‘systematized falsehood’ is a perplex and multileveled affair. It does not only involve inaccuracies within one specific specialization field, but it also entails a severe detachment of each specialization field from other related fields. It goes up to the level of …. prohibition of an entire academic discipline! Once, I published an article – plead for a forbidden science: Aramaeology.

 

Because, to come closer to the subject under discussion, if a student wants to focus on the early Islamic expansion, while studying Arabic language and literature and History of Early Islam, s/he has also to take compulsory courses on

  1. a) Aramaeans in the Eastern Roman Empire and in the Sassanid Iranian Empire,
  2. b) Political History of the Eastern Roman Empire,
  3. c) Political History of the Sassanid Iranian Empire,
  4. d) Political History of Pre-Islamic Yemen,
  5. e) Copts in the Eastern Roman Empire,
  6. f) Ancient Yemenite language and literature (which is fallaciously called ‘South-Arabian’, a ridiculous term coined by the masters of the ‘systematized falsehood’),
  7. g) Syriac {do not confuse the Christian Aramaic language that is called ‘Syriac’ with the modern adjective ‘Syrian’ which is used in relation with the modern fake state of Syria} Aramaic language and literature,
  8. h) Christian Kingdoms in Sudan,
  9. i) History of theological disputes in the Eastern Roman Empires,
  10. j) Religions in Pre-Islamic Iran and Central Asia,
  11. k) History of Northern – Northwestern Africa form Carthage to the Islamic Arrival.

 

The aforementioned are 11 (eleven) courses in total that should be compulsory for a syllabus of 28 courses leading to a Bachelor of Arts in History of Early Islam.

 

Certainly, the above eleven courses are not offered in the respective faculties of the regional universities from Morocco to Uzbekistan to Indonesia! Why? Because all the universities – be they state, private or religious – in the wider region of Islam are mere colonial products and therefore not one among their staff members commands a comprehensive knowledge covering all aspects related to the History of Early Islam. Consequently, no one can put the correct syllabus down on a piece of paper.

 

  1. II. THE PRESCRIBED, HIDDEN NATION: THE ARAMAEANS

 

In this subject, the support offered to the Arabization fallacy is epitomized in the following words: “some Arabic tribes did come out of Arabian Peninsula to live at the Northern parts, such as Palestine and Jordan. Or, at least, after the Islamic expansion, most of the tribes of Adnan (Northern Arabs) or Madar and Qahtan (Southern Arabs from Yemen) moved to Iraq, Sham and Egypt with the armies and settled there. So, that is one of the reasons why the autochthonous populations were Arabized. 

 

 

Here, reading these few lines, one gets the impression that, in the middle of the 7th century, Mesopotamia (there was no ‘Iraq’ by that time – in fact, this was a new name just brought to use by the invading armies), Syria-Palestine, and Egypt were almost … uninhabited!

 

Also, the aforementioned lands are wrongly divided in the above manner. In fact, these lands did not belong to independent countries; at the times of Prophet Muhammad’s early life, they were parts of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Sassanid Iranian Empire. But the local populations were basically Aramaeans (in the Asiatic part of the territories referred to) and Egyptians – Copts (in Egypt). Because of the constant Roman – Iranian wars, the borderlines between Syria and Mesopotamia used to change almost every year, but the local population was always Aramaean.

 

The Aramaeans spread first from the desert to the neighboring lands of the Fertile Crescent around 1100 BCE and, after they were organized in several small kingdoms for many centuries, they were successively ruled (at times partly and at times entirely) by the Sargonid Assyrian, Nabonid Babylonian, Achaemenid Iranian, Macedonian, Seleucid Syrian, Arsacid Parthian, Roman, Sassanid Iranian and Eastern Roman Empires. In few cases, there were some relatively small, independent Aramaean states in the Late Antiquity (539 BCE – 622 CE, i.e. the period going from the rise of Achaemenid Iran to the rise of Islam), such as Urhoy, Hatra, Palmyra, Adiabene and Rekem/Petra.

 

Centuries before the arrival of Islam, the Babylonians, the Phoenicians, the Philistines/Palestinians, and the Jews had been progressively assimilated among the more numerous Aramaeans. For most of the cases, Euphrates (Furat) river was the border between the Romans/Eastern Romans and the Sassanid Empire of Iran, so we are rather on the safe side, if we generalize saying that regularly Syria – Palestine was Eastern Roman (the term ‘Byzantine’ is another fallacy diffused by the promoters of the ‘systematized falsehood’) and Mesopotamia was Iranian.

 

In the eve of the early expansion of Islam, very sizable cities existed in the territories mentioned. Among the greatest cities of Eastern Roman Syria and Palestine, we count the following:

 

Antioch (Antakya in Turkey’s province of Hatay) – the main rival of Alexandria (although Antioch was in the inland)

 

After having been the capital city (323-64 BCE) of the vast Seleucid Empire (that stretched from Central Turkey to India and, following the formation of Arsacid Iran at 250 BCE, only from Central Turkey to the Persian Gulf – always including Syria and Palestine) that was the main rival of the Egyptian state of the Ptolemies for about 250 years, Antioch became a major city – patriarchate of Eastern Christianity.

 

This means that Antioch was as big and as important as only Constantinople, Rome and Alexandria within the entire Roman Empire, Eastern and Western.

 

However, more importantly, Antioch and Alexandria represented the two strongest and opposite to one another theological schools of Christian Theology. More on the subject:

http://www.monachos.net/library/index.php/patristics/themes/244-two-schools-alexandria-and-antioch

http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/bible/cei.stm

 

To better visualize the School of Antioch – School of Alexandria antithesis, it is quite advisable to compare it with the four schools of jurisprudence (madh’hab of fiqh) in Sunni Islam, namely those of Al Shaffi’i, Abu Hanifa, Malik bin Anas, and Ibn Hanbal. But there was bitter theological rivalry between the two Christian cities, and it was due to even greater differences at the underlying level of thought structure & systematization, and logic & logic philosophy.

 

Why does one need to expand to all this? Because the historical falsification as per which the aforementioned areas were arabized imposes any objective researcher and scholar to duly contextualize the event of the early Islamic expansion. To fully demonstrate that the term ‘arabization’ constitutes the epitome of colonial falsehood, one has to place the early Islamic invasions (and the ensuing settlement of certain populations in the areas under discussion) within the correct context. However, any historical event exists only within a context and without it, it is void and null.

 

At the times of Prophet Muhammad, the population of only one city, namely Antioch, was much larger than the entire population of all the Arabs together (anything between double and triple). Yet, the Arabs were then inhabiting a sizable area, notably the mountains of Hedjaz (the Western part of the Peninsula between Yemen and the Gulf of Aqaba) and the desert (the central part of the peninsula).

 

The same is also valid for Alexandria in Egypt, and for Tesifun (Ctesiphon) in Sassanid Mesopotamia (south of today’s Baghdad), which was at the time one of the two major Iranian capitals (Iran had always many capitals at the same time) along with Istakhr, which was located beyond the Zagros Mountains in Fars (near today’s Shiraz).

 

Beyond Antioch, there were many other sizeable cities in early 7th c. CE Syria – Palestine:

 

Edessa of Osroene or Urhay (today Urfa in SE Turkey), which had earlier been the capital of the Christian Aramaean Kingdom of Osroene (132 BCE to 214 CE) and then excelled as one of the most important cities-centers of Christianity worldwide

 

Harran (or Carrhae)

 

Beroea (today’s Aleppo – Haleb in Syria)

 

Apamea (near Hama in Syria) – former treasure city of the Seleucids and an important Christian center

 

Emessa (Homs in Syria)

 

Tadmor / Palmyra – one of the wealthiest and most sizable Aramaean states that was also one of the most important trade centers of the ancient world as it was located on geostrategic position in the land trade routes between the Mediterranean world, Iran, India, Egypt, Central Asia, and China

 

Laodicea (Latakiyeh in Syria)

 

Damascus

 

Bostra (today’s Bosra in Southern Syria close to the Jordanian border)

 

Tyr (major Phoenician city of the coast)

 

Sidon (major Phoenician city of the coast)

 

Byblos (major Phoenician city of the coast)

 

Beirut

 

Heliopolis (Baalbek in today’s Lebanon)

 

Caesarea of Palestine (known as Caesarea Maritima – south of Haifa on the coast) – a major Christian center

 

Jaffa / Joppa – a major coastal city and an important religious – literary center for both, Christianity and Judaism

 

Jerusalem

 

Samaria (today’s Nablous) – the old capital of the ancient state of Israel that consisted of the ten tribes of the Hebrews, whereas the state of Judah regrouped the other two tribes. The local population was Chaldaean Aramaean and constituted the earliest Aramaean settlement in Palestine, as they were transferred from Southern Mesopotamia by Sargon Emperor of Assyria immediately after he invaded the Israelite capital and transported the entire population of Israel to the NE confines of the Assyrian Empire (722 BCE).

 

Tiberias (Tabariyyah – on the coast of the homonymous lake in NE Palestine)

 

Philadelphia – Decapolis (Amman in Jordan)

 

Here, we cannot mention either Rekem – Petra (capital of the Aramaean Nabataean kingdom / 168 BCE – 106 CE) or Hegra – Mada’in Saleh (second capital of the Nabataean kingdom) because they both were progressively abandoned after the collapse of the local Aramaean kingdom.

 

The above list is not exhaustive. Smaller cities like Jerash in Jordan or Apollonia of Palestine are not included. To establish a complete topographical list of the local towns, villages and hamlets, one would include thousands of inhabited places.

 

The total population of Eastern Roman Syria – Palestine must have been around 5-6 million people in the early 7th c. CE. At those days, the Eastern Roman Empire, according all serious approximations, totaled 20 to 25 million people living in today’s South Balkans, Turkey, Syria-Palestine, Egypt and North Africa.

 

The same concerns Mesopotamia in its totality – either totally controlled by the Sassanid Iranian Empire or shared at times between the Iranians and the Eastern Romans. There were many densely populated cities except the vast capital, Tesifun (Ctesiphon). It is rather safe to claim that Mesopotamia was more populous than Syria – Palestine, as this had always been the case. The Sassanid Empire totaled a population larger than that of the Eastern Roman Empire as it also controlled Central Asia and the North of India; it was however less centralized. According to some estimates, in the early 7th c. CE, the Sassanid Empire totaled 25 to 30 million people.

 

  1. III. INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS AND INVADING ARMIES IN THE EARLY ISLAMIC EXPANSION

 

In face of the above mentioned, the inhabitants of Arabia in the early 7th c. CE did not total more than two to three hundred thousand (200000-300000) people. We know this as we know the approximate population of the cities where Prophet Muhammad lived or moved to, and the number of fighters who were engaged in battles that took place in order to prevent Prophet Muhammad’s rise of influence.

 

In any case, key Greek and Roman historical records dating back to the 1st and the 2nd centuries of the Christian era provide us with significant details as regards Arabia, and the documentation we get from them is quite sufficient for estimations, considerations and comparisons. Texts like the Periplus of the Red Sea (composed by an Alexandrian Egyptian merchant and captain around 70 CE) and the Geography of the Egyptian Alexandrian scholar Ptolemy (around the middle of the 2nd c. CE) are in this case as valuable as the geographical references to the area made by the great Roman scholar Pliny the Elder in his Natural History (Historia Naturalis).

 

It is to be always kept in mind that for several centuries the Roman Empire controlled a vast part of today’s Saudi Arabian territory (its NW corner) and more particularly the city – harbor of Leyke Kome (‘White Town’) which is identified with modern Umm Lajj on the coastland – although identification with al Wajh would be more conservative. Similarly, we know very well that Sassanid Iran occupied the entire coastland of the peninsula in the Persian Gulf (i.e. the coastlands of the modern states of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Emirates and Oman) where the indigenous population was Aramaean.

 

On the other hand, we have also to keep in mind that Najran belonged to Yemen and was inhabited by Yemenites, who are not Arabs, and the same concerns the Omanis. Only the desert and the central part of Hedjaz were inhabited by Arabs in pre-Islamic times. Makah at the times of Prophet Muhammad was an unimportant village of 5-6000 (five to six thousand) people. Yathrib (later known as Madinah) was one of the few big cities of the Arabs or even the biggest, but it still could not even be compared to one of the aforementioned big cities of Syria, Palestine or Mesopotamia. Sargonid Assyrian and Nabonid Babylonian control was extended over Yathrib which is first known thanks to Mesopotamian cuneiform literature more than 1200-1300 years before the emergence of Islam. Named Yathribu, the then small and peripheral city was the location of the summer palaces of the Nabonid kings, probably because of the prevailing weather conditions and the mild summers.

 

At this point, it is easy to recapitulate. The pre-Islamic migrations of Arabian Peninsula tribes to Syria and Mesopotamia (Eastern Roman Empire and Sassanid Iranian Empire) are rather a matter of legend and not a proper historical record. Although it is certain that they happened, they were rather migrations of reigning families, which is very common across History; they were indeed accepted and welcomed locally by indigenous populations oppressed by foreign occupation soldiers, as the Aramaeans were heavily taxed and persecuted by the Eastern Roman and the Sassanid Iranian administrations.

 

The emigrated populations do not therefore represent but a small number of fighters and their families, and this means in every case only a few thousands of people (3000 – 5000) at the most. But even if we accept the hypothesis of the emigration of an entire tribe, again the number cannot be higher than 15000 or 20000 people, which is a tremendously high number of people moving, but still of minor importance for the millions of indigenous settled populations, namely the inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. The settlement of immigrated populations may perhaps acquire some importance at the strictly local level, e.g. the area where they exactly settled. But again, in this case, it is crystal clear that the immigrated tribes were sooner or later assimilated to the settled populations that they encountered in their final area of settlement.

 

However, any tribe originating from Ancient Yemen was not Arabic but Yemenite tribe, so quite different; this will be discussed later in this article.

 

It is however true that, after the Islamic invasions, many soldiers settled in diverse places, and mainly in the area of the first capitals of the Caliphate, namely Syria (Damascus) and Mesopotamia (Baghdad), if not for any other reasons only to ensure the new Islamic state’s administration and defense.

 

But who and how many were all the soldiers of the early Islamic armies – and when?

 

Only correctly formulated questions can lead to correct conclusions. And to properly approach and understand the subject of the early Islamic armies, we need to answer the above, tripartite question. Why? Because a great part of the existing confusion / misperception of the event hinges on exactly this point: not all the details concerning the soldiers of the early Islamic armies were properly studied and taken into account, when the verdict was announced in favor of the arabization.

 

Many view indeed the event of the early Islamic invasions as a one-moment monolith. That’s pretty absurd or deliberately / suspiciously wrong. A historical event that spans over 20 years, from the 630s to the 650s (to limit it to its main part), represents the historical evolution of an entire generation. In other words, it is not an event anymore, but rather a historical process.

 

This automatically means that the ethnic (racial) composition of the early Islamic armies changed progressively from 633-4 to 640, to 645, to 650. As one victory succeeded another from 633 to 711, a certain number of indigenous people in Palestine, Mesopotamia, Syria, Iran, Egypt, Anatolia, Caucasus, Central Asia, North Africa, India and in the Iberian peninsula adhered to Islam, and started participating in the next stage of the expansion.

 

What follows is a brief presentation of how and why this happened in a way that is still concealed from most!

 

After the Arabs accepted the Prophet Muhammad’s calling, Ali preached in Yemen’s (then new) capital Sanaa in 630, two years before the Prophet died, and all the Yemenites and the Omanis accepted Islam peacefully. As Yemen and Oman were provinces of Iran, it is very remarkable that even the Iranian chief administrator accepted Ali’s preaching. Yemen had a much larger population than Arabia itself, as ancient records clearly evidence; texts like the Periplus of the Red Sea, Ptolemy’s Geography, Cosmas Indicopleustes’ Christian Topography (written only 20 or 30 years before Prophet Muhammad’s birth), and the much hated by the biased Freemasonic Orientalist scholarship text ‘Laws on the Homerites’, i.e. the legislation of the Ancient Yemenite state of Himyar by Saint Gregentios, Archbishop of Taphar (dating in the 1st half of the 6th c. CE) include extensive and valuable information in support of the aforementioned estimates of population.

 

This means that at, until the death of Prophet Muhammad, Ali had already brought to Islam more people than Prophet Muhammad himself! At those days, the entire population of Yemen may have totaled 1 to 1.5 million people, thus outnumbering the Arabs by 5:1 to 7:1. The fact that Yemenites are totally dissociated from Arabs ethnically, linguistically and culturally will be discussed later.

 

The normal consequence of the above reality is that, when the wars started between the Islamic Caliphate on one side and the Eastern Roman and the Sassanid Iranian Empires on the other, the very early Islamic armies (633-639) consisted of Arabs, Yemenites, Omanis, and few Persian and Roman new converts and proselytes (the likes of Salman al Farsi, etc.). Following the acceptance of Islam by non Arabs, Yemenites and others, it was very common for Arabs to give Arabic names or nicknames to the new converts and proselytes (thus, for example, Salman al Farsi was also called ‘Abu Abdullah’), but this did not make of them Arabs – in anything.

 

However, at a later stage, when the Islamic armies fought at Nahavand (in the Zagros Mountains that separate today’s Iraq from Iran) and besieged Alexandria in Egypt (642), the combat forces were made of Arabs, Yemenites, Omanis, and Aramaeans from Syria, Palestine and Mesopotamia – areas that had just been invaded few years ago, during the period 633-639. In just 5 years after Islam went out of the peninsula, a very remarkable part of the Islamic armies (1/4 to 1/3 by modest estimates) was composed of soldiers who were not native Arabic speakers.

 

Subsequently, in the later stage of the Islamic expansion (650-711), Persian soldiers may have fought in Spain, and Egyptian soldiers may have fought in Northern India. So, Arabs became progressively a minority in the Islamic armies. At that level, the personal names of the soldiers mean absolutely nothing, because to Copts, Aramaeans, Persians, Berbers and others, adhesion to Islam meant immediate acquisition of Islamic personal names in Arabic.

 

We know from crosschecked sources that even in the critical middle stage of the Islamic expansion (640-650), the Islamic armies were not numerous (ex. 30000 soldiers in the battle of Nahavand). Even if we suppose that all of them were Arabs (and we know that they were not), that all of them settled in only one of the newly invaded lands, for instance Syria (and we know that they did not limit themselves in only one), again we have to admit that their numbers were so minimal that they were finally assimilated among the indigenous populations, i.e the Aramaeans or the Copts, the Berbers and others.

 

  1. IV. ISLAM: THE CULTURAL ARAMAIZATION OF THE ARABS

 

As regards the Arabization falsehood, there may be two more points to discuss, e.g. linguistic arabization and cultural arabization. Academia and intellectuals supporting the Orientalist hoax often refer to these points that are however null.

 

Linguistic arabization does not mean or imply anything; within few generations and quite recently, African Americans became English native speakers in the US, and they forgot their past native languages that they were still speaking when they forst set foot on American soil. However, they did not become Indo-Europeans, or to put it more specifically Anglo-Saxons, as regards their ethnic origin. Neither can one ascribe them to the average English or White American culture.

 

To some extent, the arabization hoax survived for so long, only to confuse everyone and have political ramifications of calamitous character (Pan-Arabism, Arab Nationalism, etc.), because there was something important missing in the syllabuses of departments specializing on History of the Islamic World.

 

As a matter of fact, it is very wrong to study Early History of Islam as only Political History or History of Religion – and this is what happened until now either in the West or in the fake states that were formed after the dissolution of the major powers of the Islamic World, i.e. the Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran, and Mughal India. In fact, the most important dimension of the Early History of Islam, which remains highly disregarded and unstudied, lies within the field of History of Civilizations (and Cultures) – a far wider field whereby every religion is widely contextualized and highly parameterized.

 

Actually, if we intend to study the diverse acculturation phenomena that took place in the 7th c. CE onwards due to the preaching of Islam by Prophet Muhammad, we have to focus primarily not on the Aramaeans and the Yemenites, but on the Arabs. In critical terms of Cultural Studies that have to apply in this case, the Arabs by accepting Islam, were profoundly, drastically and irrevocably aramaeanized and fully acculturated among the Christian Aramaeans. Islam viewed (not within the narrow context of religion but) as Culture was the most complete rejection of the earlier Arabic culture, legends, narratives, cults, beliefs, attitudes and – generally speaking – behavioral system. Aramaean culture, legends and narratives, as evoked by the new religion, replaced Arab culture following the preaching of Prophet Muhammad.

 

It is only because of the biased, anti-Islamic attitude of the West that scholars and researchers specializing in Early History of Islam did not notice that, before and after Hijra, the opponents and enemies of Prophet Muhammad did not reject a new religion (because Islam had not yet been fully articulated) but disparate religious ideas and concepts (those preached by one of their compatriots who was neither a local magistrate nor a priest of an already known religion) that – all – constituted the foremost rejection of what had been known among as Arab culture. In fact, they reacted and opposed his teachings because what he evangelized was alien to their nomad Arab culture and drastically opposed their behavioral system to which they wanted to stick.

 

Ages old, anti-Islamic hatred and hidden political motivations against the entire Islamic World were the reasons for which 18th and 19th c. Orientalists and Islamologists deliberately left vast fields of research and exploration unexploited and unstudied, because it was crystal clear to them that the end result would not correspond at all to their prefixed ideas and pre-arranged conclusions. As it happened, 20th c. Islamologists continued advancing on the footsteps of their predecessors and in the process a wide area of academic exploration remained terra incognita.

 

To put it correctly, at the times of Hijra (622 CE), Islam was actually a ‘new’ religion only to Arabs – not to Aramaeans! Almost all the subjects discussed within the Quran and the Hadith at the times of Prophet Muhammad were known to Aramaeans (either exactly as preached or slightly different), but not to Arabs. By this, I don’t mean that the verses of the Quran were already known in the very form in which they were uttered, but that the underlying concepts, stories, and narratives, as well as the ensuing mindsets, mentalities, attitudes and behaviors preexisted.

 

In this regard, there are plenty of examples. The entire cosmology of Islam, the narratives about the Creation, the expulsion from the original Paradise, the deviance of the early mankind, the morals of the Sodom and Gomorrah people (as reprimanded and castigated by God in the story of Lot / ch. 26, 160-171), and the Flood (involving Prophet Noah – Nuh), the stories about the Pharaoh, Moses (Musa) and the Exodus, about Jonah, and the moral concepts and values that they represent, the rejection of the Christian theory about Jesus’ divinity (which had already been rejected by the great Christian theologian and Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Nestorius 130 years before Prophet Muhammad was born), a great number of religious practices involving prayer, prostration, fasting, etc., the ensuing ethics and morals, attitudinal and behavioral systems preexisted among Aramaeans.

 

Particularly, the Nestorian Aramaeans’ values, behaviors, knowledge, science and esthetics heralded in a way Prophet Muhammad and, after the diffusion of Islam beyond the peninsula, took the central part and played the main role in the rise of the Islamic Civilization. Arabic writing is in fact a later deformation of the Syriac Aramaic writing. For this reason, early Islam did not appear to the Christians of the times of Prophet Muhammad as another, distinct, religion but rather a new form of heresy or a radical reassertion and rehabilitation of Nestorianism.

 

The implantation of Aramaean culture among Arabs through Islam and the early acculturation of the Arabs among the Aramaeans were the main reasons for which the populations of Syria, Palestine and Mesopotamia were immediately favorable to the Islamic armies and did not support the defense of the country to which they belonged – either Eastern Roman Empire or Sassanid Iranian Empire.

 

  1. V. THE EARLY ISLAMIC INVASIONS: FIRST MISREPRESENTED AND DISFORMED BY THE WESTERN ORIENTALISTS, SECOND USED IDEOLOGICALLY & POLITICALLY BY THE COLONIAL GANGSTERS

 

The aforementioned reality has been concealed at a global academic – educational – intellectual level, because it severely harms the ‘systematized falsehood’ that Western academia wanted to impose and did actually impose worldwide as regards the early Islamic expansion.

 

At this point, one must take into consideration that the imposition of the ‘systematized falsehood’ did not occur only in Western universities and in the derivative establishments setup in colonized countries but also within the so-called Islamic universities (the likes of Al Azhar and Madinah universities) whereby misleading, constrained and trimmed, de-contextualizing syllabuses exist only to obscure students and perpetuate the prevailing ignorance of the real History of Islam among Muslim academics.

 

As per the promoted and imposed Western ‘systematized falsehood’, the Islamic expansion phenomenon is called ‘Muslim / Islamic invasions’ or rather ‘Islamic / Muslim conquests’ (the last option is the title of the Wikipedia entry), and it is depicted as involving extensive bloodshed, fierce battles, and cruel attitudes that were supposedly imposed on an otherwise peaceful Christian Mediterranean world by some barbarians. In other words, Islam is depicted an external threat and an impending danger, whereas quite contrarily all the constituent elements of the Islam can be found on Eastern Roman territory.

 

In this regard, it is useful to add that Oriental Christianity has also been deliberately kept unknown to all Western Christian schoolchildren and students (with the exception of the very few researchers who begin their specialization in this topic only in their postgraduate studies). It is definitely paranoid for a Western schoolchild and student to be given through their general education more info about India, Buddhism, and China than about Constantinipolitan Orthodoxy, Coptic and Syriac Monophysitism, East Aramaean Nestorianism, and Oriental Christianity.

 

This hiatus is deliberate and serves the Western academics, who are the promoters of the ‘systematized falsehood’, to firmly dissociate and disentangle Islam from the Christian world. This viciously contradicts all the historical evidence. It is therefore not just a lie, but a criminal falsehood geared to be a time capsule for repetitive use any time the Freemasonic political establishment of the corrupt West intends to tarnish and demonize Islam.

 

And the aforementioned analysis of the fact that the Orient was never arabized but, quite contrarily, the Arabs have been aramaeanized through Islam clearly demonstrates that the Western negative portrait of the early Islamic expansion is totally false. Islam as Culture and Civilization was developed under determinant Aramaean impact and was never an external factor to Christians. Even more importantly, the most original Christians of the early 7th c. CE and those, who had more direct and correct info about the preaching of Prophet Muhammad, did not hesitate to either adhere to Islam or remain Christian and reject the Eastern Roman rule. This is of colossal importance because, in full rejection of the Freemasonic Orientalist colonial evilness and lies, it means that for the true Christians, the Islamic rule, administration and ‘political power’ (being wrong the term is used only conventionally here) is definitely preferable to the devious and evil Roman or Western control.

 

In addition to the above, the assumption of ‘a pre-Islamic peaceful Christian world which was interrupted by Islam’s conquering armies’ contradicts all historical sources, being viciously false, heinous and criminal because of its implications. Before the arrival of Islam, the Perso-Roman wars were not the only conflict in the wider region. Within the Roman Empire, many theological disputes ended in ceaseless conflicts and bloodshed. The rise of Arianism against official Roman Christianity in the 4th c. CE resulted in endless wars, fights, cruel oppression, and hundreds of thousands of dead. Donatism, considered as another heresy, turned North Africa to a permanent battlefield and to a land of oppression in the 4th and the 5th centuries.

 

Starting already in the 2nd and the 3rd c. CE, Marcionism and Docetism were considered as heretic theological schools and therefore persecuted. However, they survived across many centuries only to give birth to other theological schools which, under strong Gnostic impact, contrasted with Roman and Constantinopolitan Christianity, leaving even significant traces within Islam.

 

The prominent position offered to Jesus by Mani in his new religion (Manichaeism – Manawiyah in Arabic), which was preached in Ctesiphon (the Iranian capital at Mesopotamia) 400 years before Prophet Muhammad, confused Christianity while offering the newly risen Sassanid dynasty an excellent tool to attract Christian populations to a religion that incorporated elements of Gnosticisms, Christianity, and Zoroastrianism. Manichaeism had an extraordinary expansion, without war, through trade and ideological mobilization, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Despite the great impact that Manichaeism had across the Roman Empire, it was bloodily persecuted, and the same occurred later in Iran as well, when Mazdeism (a reinstatement of the Zoroastrian orthodoxy) prevailed among the Sassanids. Persecuted Manichaean communities from NW Africa, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Iran, Central Asia, and China left a voluminous material record without which it is absolutely impossible to assess the History of the Orient and therefore the History of the Islamic Caliphates. Even at its greatest expansion, Islam did not cover an area as large as that where Manicheans were dispersed worldwide – although they seldom controlled the administration of a country.

 

The two strongest theological opponents of Official Christianity managed finally to control the patriarchates of Antioch and Alexandria in the 5th c. CE. Monophysitism is today the original form of Christianity accepted by the Copts, the Western Aramaeans (in Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan), the Armenians, the Georgians, and the Abyssinians. Monophysitism is actually a derogatory term given to Monophysites by their Roman and Constantinopolitan opponents; whenever mentioned across this text, it is used conventionally. The correct term would be Henophysitism; as theological system, it was the theoretical ‘child’ of the School of Alexandria. Following the rejection of the majority decision at the Council of Chalcedon (451) by the Monophysites, the schism became definite between the patriarchates of Rome and Constantinople on one side and those of the East on the other. Subsequently, Eastern Roman soldiers carried out plans of terrible persecution against the local populations. In few words, Monophysitism rejects the official Christian dogma that Jesus as Christ (Messiah) had two natures, i.e. divine and human, and stipulates that Jesus had only one. divine and human, nature.

 

On the other hand, Nestorianism was the theoretical ‘child’ of the School of Antioch and was rejected in both, the Council of Ephesus (431) and the Council of Chalcedon. Eastern Aramaeans accepted Nestorianism overwhelmingly and Iranian Christians adhered to the dogma of Nestorius in their totality. Nestorius launched the Great Church of the Orient outside Roman territory and in the beginning many Nestorian Aramaeans moved from Eastern Roman Syria to Sassanid Iranian Mesopotamia. The result was that after the middle of the 5th c. CE (so, only 130 years before Prophet Muhammad’s birth), all the populations of the Eastern Roman Empire east of today’s Central Turkey rejected flatly the official religion of Constantinople. Nestorianism spread across Iran to Northern India, Central Asia, and China leaving evidence for more than 1000 years after Nestorius, who is also believed to be a Saint by the Christians of Malabar in Southwestern India. At the antipodes of Monophysitism, Nestorianism makes clear that Jesus had only a human nature, being thus far closer to Islam than any other system of faith.

 

The fight of the terms took the forefront place of the polarization with the Nestorians introducing for Virgin Mary the term ‘Christotokos’ (Mother of the Christ) in flat rejection of the official Constantinopolitan term ‘Theotokos’ (Mother of God). Anti-Eastern Christian persecutions in the Eastern Roman Empire and the Sassanid Iranian Empire were as severe as the incessant wars between the two strongest states of the then known world.

 

All these perplex, multifaceted and endless strives came to an end and different religions and denominations coexisted peacefully within the early Islamic caliphates (the Umayyad and the Abbasid dynasties). The rise of the Islamic Caliphates was a most beneficial event not only for those among the Aramaeans, the Persians, the Copts and the Berbers who accepted the new faith but also – and this is far more important – for those who preferred to remain Monophysitic Christian, Nestorian Christian, Manichaean and other and live under Islamic Rashidun (and later Umayyad and Abbasid) Caliphate rule rather than Eastern Roman tutelage or Sassanid Iranian scepter. This is clearly evidenced by texts like the Ta’rikh Batarikat al-Kanisah al-Misriyah by Severus ibn al-Mukaffa, Coptic bishop and historian, or the Chronicle of John of Nikiû.

 

And this is exactly what the ‘systematized falsehood’ of the West does not want known to anybody about Islam. Even centuries after the Islamic expansion, the Oriental Christians preferred to live safely, securely, productively and peacefully under the Islamic Caliphate’s administration rather than to be exposed to the heavy taxation, persecution and cruelty of Constantinople or Rome. This is not strange at all. Anti-Islamism did not exist among the Christians of the early Islamic times; the wars fought were only due to the fact that the Constantinopolitan imperial power did not fully and irrevocably accept the permanent loss of their Oriental provinces.

 

Only much later, Anti-Islamism became an influential political attitude in Western Europe; this happened only after the Pope of Rome, due to his military ineptitude, economic weakness, and political fragility was placed under Frankish political tutelage. The rise of the barbarian Frankish kingdom and the prevalence of Franks in Rome (800 CE) led to the First Great Schism (867 CE) between Constantinople and Rome, which was another Frankish trickery carried out in order to fully place Rome under Frankish control and offer the barbarian Franks the chance to alter / corrupt the Catholic Church of Rome from inside. Only after these developments, Anti-Islamism appears in Western Europe as a tool of Frankish political propaganda.

 

In fact, the earliest texts of the Eastern Roman Empire that mention the explosion of Islam in Arabia (Chronicle Paschale and the Chronicle of Theophanes the Confessor) presented Islam as rather a Christian heresy, not an independent religion. This shows the religious – cultural vicinity of the two systems and, at the same time, demonstrates that the constant wars between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Islamic Caliphate between the 7th and the 11th centuries reflected basically economic and political interests and not a radical religious opposition or rejection.

 

This is another key dimension of Oriental History that the modern Western falsifiers want the entire world not to know.

  1. VI. ANCIENT YEMEN AND PRE-ISLAMIC ARABIA

 

Speaking about the Southern, Southwestern, Southeastern and Eastern confines of the Arabian Peninsula, one has to totally and irrevocably dissociate Yemen and Oman from the Pre-Islamic Arabs. The Ancient Yemenites and Omanis were not Arabs, and their languages were very different from Arabic, although they all were Semitic languages. Similarly, modern Yemenites are not related to Arabs in any sense, because Yemen accepted Islam without ever being occupied by a single Arab soldier. The so-called phenomenon of the Islamic invasions did not occur in Yemen, Oman, Somalia and the entire Eastern African coast – at all! And no Arabs settled in Yemen under any circumstances whatsoever.

 

Ancient Yemen developed its own syllabic writing system at least 1000 years before the first pre-Islamic Arabic texts are attested in Hedjaz (and this happens as late as the middle of the 3 rd c. CE). The Ancient Yemenite kingdoms of Saba (Sheba), Qataban, Awsan, Ma’in, Himyar, and Hadhramawt are documented by the unearthed epigraphic evidence and they were also constantly referred to in Ancient Assyrian, Babylonian, Iranian, Greek and Roman historical sources. Oman was always an Iranian province, and we have attested Iranian occupation of Yemen in both, the Achaemenid period (550-330 BCE) and the Sassanid times (224-651 CE). Few years, after the Roman annexation of Egypt and the death of Cleopatra (30 BCE), Octavian sent the Roman fleet as far as Aden to destroy that wealthy city-harbor that controlled the Indian Ocean maritime trade and imposed heavy taxes on all products sent from India and East Africa through the Bab al Mandeb straits of the Red Sea to Alexandria and the Mediterranean world.

 

Describing harbors, navigation details, trade centers, and products across the sea route of the trade (plus its land and desert extensions/ramifications) between the Mediterranean World, East Africa, India, Central Asia, Indochina-Indonesia, and China, the text Periplus of the Red Sea (written around 70 CE) offers a dramatic contrast between civilized Yemen and Arabia.

 

In an article titled ‘Civilized Yemen vs. Barbaric Arabia: the Historical Divide will shape the Future’, published in Buzzle (6 August 2005), I included an English translation of the text, and I analyzed extensively the specific excerpt of this text. I republish the excerpt here as well:

 

Starting by paragraph 19 of his text, the author describes the navigation at the Eastern edge of the Red Sea. He refers to Leuke Kome (“White Town”) as the first harbour and port of call on the sailor’s way to the south. Since the departure is given not from Arsinoe (Suez) but Myos Hormos (the Mouse’s Bay), which corresponds to al Ghardaq – Hurghada in the Egyptian Red Sea coast, and the distance mentioned is 1000 to 1500 stadia (1 stadium equals 185 m), we deduce that Leuke Kome must be identified as the modern coastal town Al Wadjh.

The text refers to the Roman military presence (“ekatontarchos”: a centurion, officer leading 100 Roman soldiers), Roman fiscal presence (“paraleptes tes tetartes”: a customs officer dispatched in order to get 25% of the passing merchandise as tax), as well as a land road to the Aramaic Nabataean capital Rekem / Petra of King Malichus (certainly Malichus II). The Roman garrisons ensured safety for the land trade, since the main part of the merchandises (sent to Rekem and further on to Jerusalem, Damascus, Antioch, or Palmyra) was transported from Yemen by sea to Leuke Kome. Who were the inhabitants of that place? Since Leuke Kome does NOT belong to ‘Arabia’, we can deduce that they were probably Aramaeans, possibly of the highly civilized Nabataean branch, since the text makes a striking differentiation between them and the Arab inhabitants of the coast immediately in the south of Leuke Kome.

According to the Periplus of the Red Sea, civilization ends at Leuke Kome, and starts again around Mouza that is in the modern Yemenite Red Sea coast. What lies between them is the realm of Arab barbarism according to the author of the text (paragraph 20), which reads as follows:

“Immediately after this port (Leuke Kome) starts Arabia, which is extended alongside a large part of the Red Sea. It is inhabited by various peoples and tribes, whose languages differ either a little or totally. The coastal zone features many groups of huts of the fish–eaters, whereas the inland includes hamlets and pastures, being inhabited by a people who speak two languages and have a perverted character. These people rob those who deviate from their sailing just in the middle of the sea, and come nearby their coasts. They arrest all the shipwrecked, so that they make later use of them as captives. That is why the Kings of Yemen attack them, and hold many of them as prisoners. They are called Canraites (note: this is the single time this term was used in Ancient Greek literature). Truly, any sort of navigation nearby the coast of Arabia is particularly dangerous, and this area is characterized by a lack of ports and offers few possibilities of anchorage, being full of perilous rocks, difficult of reach because of the rocky precipices, and awful from any viewpoint. That is why when we sail south, we navigate in the open sea, and as fast as possible, until we reach the Katakekavmene Neso (‘Scorched Island’). Immediately after that island, there are plenty of lands inhabited by civilized people, who have large cattle, and use camels for their trade and transportation”.

Here we are already among the ancient Yemenites! The Katakekavmene Island can be identified with Farasan islands, slightly north of the Northern Yemenite borderline. The text enters then paragraph 21, as follows:

“Beyond these areas, in the last bay of the coast that is extended on our left during our navigation, lies Mouza, which is an official (“nomimon”: controlled by the state) port of call. If we follow the correct navigation line to the south, it lies in a distance of 12000 stadia from Berenice. The city is exclusively inhabited by Yemenites, captains and mariners, and is burgeoning with commercial activity (lit. “the trade is exceeding”) since it plays a vital role in the commerce up to Barygaza, and in this business the Mouza people use their own equipment”.

 

I think that further comments are not needed. As a matter of fact, in the middle of the 1st c. CE when the Periplus was written, the merged kingdoms of Saba and Himyar had replaced Qataban, and controlled the entire Somali coast of Eastern Africa as colony (from the Horn of Africa to approximately the area of Dares salaam in today’s Tanzania). Similarly, the kingdom of Hadhramwt had the island of Socotra as colony. Yemenites had excellent navigational skills and know how, having been the undisputed masters of the Indian Ocean navigation for almost 1500 years before the arrival of Islam. Whenever we refer to Islamic times’ navigation between the Arabian Peninsula and Eastern Africa up to China, we mean that it was almost exclusively in the hands of the Yemenite Muslims who by accepting Islam started using Arabic and gradually abandoned their native language. They were called Arabs, but in fact they were not Arabs.

 

However, in today’s Hadhramawt, Socotra and North Somalia (Bossasso), two languages originating from the Ancient Yemenite languages have survived. Hundreds of thousands of people are native in these languages. Last but not the least, the decipherment of the Ancient Yemenite writing was done through constant comparisons with Ge’ez which is the writing system of the Ancient Abyssinians and at the same time the religious language of the Christian Abyssinian state of Axum. In fact, Ge’ez is a late Yemenite writing and the striking similarities helped scholars rapidly complete the decipherment of the Ancient Yemenite writing. This is not strange at all because the Abyssinians are just a Yemenite tribe that crossed the Red Sea and settled in the African coast in the second half of the 1st millennium BCE. The name Habashat has been attested in Ancient Yemenite epigraphic evidence as well.

 

  1. VII. HOMOGENEITY vs. HETEROGENEITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST

 

Speaking about the entire area of the Ottoman Caliphate (the term ‘Middle East’ being false and racist), one would however be wrong to conclude, in spite of the aforementioned, that the region has lacked homogeneity either historically or presently.

 

Homogeneity does not exclude diversification. And diversification does not mean heterogeneity.

 

In fact, before 500 years, there was an excellent, remarkable homogeneity among all peoples and nations inhabiting the vast area between Morocco and Indonesia, prior to the arrival of the Western European colonial powers. To move from the Atlantic coast to Buddhist Myanmar in 1530, one needed to cross only three borders, namely those between: a) the Berber Moroccan kingdom and the Ottoman Empire, b) the Ottoman Empire and Safavid Iran, and c) Safavid Iran and Mughal India.

 

And despite all possible local wars among Muslim governments or conflicts between Muslims and followers of other religions in the wider region of the Islamic world, there was never hatred and evilness as much as after the arrival of the alien intruders, who came from Western Europe after they had already rejected Christianity and replaced it with Freemasonic Satanism in the backstage of politics back in their countries. It is only the presence of the French, the English, the Dutch, the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the Belgians, and the Americans that opened Pandora’s Box in Asia, Africa and America, turning high civilizations to utmost misery, excruciating poverty, abject materialism, fratricidal wreckage, and compact barbarism. They found a world that looked almost like a Paradise, and they turned it to the worst version of Hell.

 

Liberal – Secular Opposition in Egypt, their Targets, and the Freemasonic Threats for Egypt’s Future

(Public lecture given at the Gamaaeyah Ansar wa Sunnah, Aswan – Egypt, on December 14, 2012)

The confusing situation that prevails in today’s Egypt and the intensive activism of the liberal – secular opposition do not herald anything good for the country. The great majority of the Egyptians, irrespective of their faith, ideas, and political position, are deeply worried about the future of the country. But this does not bother the liberal – secular opposition at all; quite contrarily, their leaders consider it possible to benefit from it.

How trustworthy a group of political parties can be, when they disregard the worries of the outright majority of the Egyptian people? How virtuous can they be?

Disregard of the people’s worries and wishes is the typical characteristic of a dictatorship; customarily, former president Mubarak disregarded the worries and the wishes of the Egyptian people in a very great number of political and social issues.

Opposing former president Mubarak, the liberal – secular organizations that later formed the backbone of today’s opposition tried to give the impression that they are democratic, which supposedly means that they respect the expressed will of the people, the recorded votes of the people, and the articulated wishes of the majority of the people.

The impression they gave about them being democratic is absolutely false. Not only because they are not democratic. Certainly, they are very totalitarian, and the will and the wishes of the Egyptian people are not a matter of concern for them.

The reason for which Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition is not democratic is double and deeply historical.

I. Democracy: a fake, euphemistic name for a tyrannical regime

First, in real, historical terms, democracy is not a properly speaking democratic system, but a form of tyranny. The term was first established in Ancient Greece where there was no large or big state, but rather small cities-states, like in Phoenicia. In the first half of the 1st millennium BCE, each Ancient Greek state was a small kingdom, but progressively in the 6th century BCE many kingdoms were overthrown and many cities-states became either tyrannies or democracies.

At the time, tyrant meant a strong leader who controlled militarily the small state with the help of an armed group. And democracy meant a city-state that was ruled by the will not of one person, but by the will of the people (demos). Literarily speaking, ‘democracy’ means ‘the state of the people’. But how democratic was a democracy like that of Athens in the 5th century BCE?

In Athens, the majority of the population consisted of the slaves; they originated from Phrygia, Thrace, Illyria, Macedonia, Scythia, etc. As per different estimates of specialists, the slaves in Athens constituted anything between 60 and 70% of the total population. The same phenomenon occurred in the supposedly ‘democratic’ Roman Republic few centuries later. As a matter of fact, the slaves not only did not have the right to vote but were not even considered as ‘humans’. In Latin, they were called ‘res’ that is ‘things’.

Furthermore, the female population in Athens, in other so-called democratic cities-states, and in Rome, had no civil rights, and consequently women could not participate in the decision-making process of each country. Therefore, if we assume that in 5th century BCE Athens the local population constituted ca. 35% of the entire population, we realize that, practically speaking, the political affairs were controlled by half of that population, e.g. the males, which reduces the decision-makers to a mere 17-18%. But of course only adult men were accepted, and this concludes the case of the undemocratic system of rule that prevailed in Ancient Athens: the political control was in fact at the hands of no more than 10-12% of the population, i.e. the adult males of local origin. At this point, one should take into consideration the fact that foreign residents were also excluded, because ‘local origin’ in a city-state in Ancient Greece usually meant proven residence of a family in the city-state for no less than six (6) generations, which translates to ca. 150 years!

If we now refer to each political decision taken and imposed, we certainly go to an even lower figure, because in the debates that took place, there were always different / opposite opinions and suggestions expressed, and – as in the modern fake democracies – the decision reflected the political will of the majority among this small group of 10-12% of the entire local population. In other words, ca. 6-7% of the entire population decided and ‘legitimately’ imposed their decision on the rest. In many cases, the decision meant taxes, war, death or other seminal issues.

II. Ancient Greek democracy: it was not ‘democracy’, and it was not Greek.

One should also examine whether some among the Ancient Greeks really invented this political system, and if not, how it was diffused among them. There are ancient Greek texts that illuminate this point; according to substantive textual evidence, there were many Phoenicians who settled colonies in the Aegean Sea and in different parts of continental Greece, as they did in many other coastlands of the Mediterranean Sea, nad in the Atlantic coasts of Iberia and NW Africa.
In fact, it is from the sociopolitical and administrative system of the Phoenician colonies that many social groups and political parties in different Ancient Greek cities-states got this new political concept. Contrarily to the Phoenician cities-states (Tyr, Byblus, Sidon, Beirut, Arvad, etc.) that were all kingdoms, the Phoenician colonies were real democracies; most important and most famous among them was Carthage, which was founded in the year 800 BCE in the area of modern Tunis.

Carthage, like every other Phoenician and Carthaginian colony, was a democracy, because there was a general assembly of the Phoenician colons established there, and they elected the Senate, the government and the ruler. In the light of aforementioned, it is important to note that, prior to the year 600 BCE, there was not a single Ancient Greek state to be governed by a ‘democratic’ system.

III. Ancient & modern ‘democracy’: Fake political systems based on historical forgery

But why no one attributes today the origin of Democracy to the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians, and as per the prevailing opinion the system was invented by some Ancient Greeks?

This question finds its answer in another question:

Why everyone in the West considers the Ancient Greek adaptation of the Phoenician colonies’ political system as a truly ‘democratic’ system and as a real ‘state of the people’ (as the Ancient Greek word clearly denotes), whereas in the place where this term was first created, the so-called ‘democratic’ system was deeply and clearly undemocratic and anti-democratic?

The answer to both questions is one:

Those who by controlling the leading Western countries exercise an undeniable control over large parts of today’s world,
a) have prepared and diffused their own false History (and amongst others wiped out the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians),
b) have had the need to propagate an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens, and – even worse –
c) have ruled the modern Western world (and a very large part of the world through their colonies), using a similar, unrepresentative and undemocratic system: the modern pseudo-democracy.

IV. Fake western democracy and Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition

Now, where does all this take us with regard to Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

The historical reason for which Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is undemocratic and dictatorial we already explained; they ascribe themselves to an old system of ruling that is very discriminatory and absolutely totalitarian. Even the word coined to describe this system in Ancient Greece – a word that reflects not a reality but merely an Ancient Greek viewpoint of it – was quite contradictory to the historical reality and practice of that system.

But there is also political evidence testifying to the fact that Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is in reality undemocratic and dictatorial. This is the point to discuss here. The identity and the nature of the political promoters of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition do not bode well for Egypt’s future.

Who are the real fabricators, supporters, promoters and employers of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Screening the international and the Egyptian mass media, we can safely identify them; every time there is a clash between the Islamist government and the liberal – secular opposition, they lash out at the government whereas in parallel they side with the opposition, thus shockingly interfering in the political life of the country. Who are they? They are those, who ….

have managed to control today’s westernized – ‘global’ world to large extent,

have prepared and diffused their systematic, false History,

have had the need to propagate and evidently propagated an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens in order to rule the world through this bias

have ruled most of today’s world through this bias, and in the process they disseminated antihuman, evil ideas and practices, overwhelming corruption, and ultimately imposed an evil lifestyle and way of life, deprived of virtues and values, at the very antipodes of all the earlier social models and the associated cultures and civilizations throughout History.

Who are the fabricators of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Here we have to deal with several layers of political corruption, financial dependence, and evil backstage practices.

Those who fabricated today’s various opposition groups that did not exist before 3 years, with the exception of the Wafd party, the socialists and the communists, are:

International NGOs,

International organizations,

Western governments,

Financial groups of power, banks and funds,

Research institutes and political lobbies,

And, behind them all, a secret company that controls everything behind the political stage.

What is this company and what are their plans?

With its roots retraced back to the Antiquity and with its origins going back to the 3rd millennium BCE, this secret company is ‘recently’ known under the name of Freemasonry, and they have been known under this name for almost 300 years (1717). Although marginal during the Christian and Islamic Ages, they rose to power first in Western Europe through the biases of Renaissance, Classicism, Enlightenment Philosophy, American Revolution, French Revolution, Industrial Revolution, and Marxism – Leninism.

What are the main points that bear witness to a link between the secret company of the Freemasons and Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

First of all, there are several members of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition that are freemasons; they blindly and wholeheartedly execute the orders they receive. Mohamed el Baradei is one of them. You can be sure that in today’s world no one becomes Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency without being a Freemason, and more importantly, without being a very much trusted member of the villainous, Satanic organization. Positions like that are viewed by the Freemasons as outstanding posts and key instruments in their effort to take over the entire world, so only perfectly utilizable and utilized members are promoted to and maintained in such positions.

What few people know is that for them, their country and their religion are of no value, as the oath of allegiance they made when becoming freemasons supersedes every other and every previous.

Second, there is vast similarity of political language. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition promises now to deliver in Egypt corresponds to what other Freemasonry-controlled parties, mass media, associations, organizations, statesmen, politicians, journalists and intellectuals demanded or propagated in so many countries all over the world. The terms, the concepts, the ideals, the ‘values’, the words and the jargon evoked are exactly the same.

Third, there is vast similarity of targets and criticisms. Whom do they criticize? Always anyone who is not a Freemason or a Freemasonry-controlled party, association, organization, statesman, politician, journalist and intellectual!

With exactly the same resolution, they rejected two persons that belonged effectively to two different worlds, namely former President Hosni Mubarak and current President Muhammad Morsi, only because both are not freemasons! They certainly find excuses for this biased ludicrous attitude of theirs, and they publicly pretend that they reject totalitarian rulers, but their shameless stance is easily unveiled when one notices that finally, for the Freemasons and their puppets, the only non-totalitarian rulers are their Freemasonic ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’! This seclusion-promoting, highly discriminatory mindset is diametrically opposed to the normal, unbiased, average mindset of the human beings as this was attested across millennia. Of course, Mubarak and Morsi are not the only targets of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition! They also speak negatively about Venezuela’s Chavez, Bolivia’s Morales, Russia’s Putin, Belarus’ Lukashenko, etc., etc., etc. only because all these statesmen and rulers are not freemasons!

Fourth, there is vast similarity of political allies, models and points of reference. Whom do they refer to? Who is the perfect political example for them? Who are the perfect embodiments of all the ideas they evoke? Always Western European, North American states, parties, associations, mass media that are known to be under Freemasonic control or politicians and statesmen, journalists and intellectuals who are known to be Freemasons.

Fifth, there is vast similarity of methods. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition attempts to do now, other Freemasonry-controlled schemes tried to perpetrate in other countries in various moments over the past decades. Simply, not many people noticed (let alone studied) the correct parallels! One can effectively draw parallels and compare Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition with king Juan Carlos of Spain and his associates during the last decade of Franco’s regime, and after the Generalissimo’s death. For many years, Prince Juan Carlos promised fidelity to Franco’s ideals and respect to the Catholic Church’s concepts and social standards. However, treacherously enough, after Franco died, Freemason Juan Carlos promoted Freemasonic policies and practices up to the point of signing laws legitimizing adultery, abortion and, more recently, homosexual marriages and adoption of children by homosexual couples. In a 40 years space of time, all the traditional ethics, the cultural integrity, and the religious identity of Spain collapsed. This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will prove to be good for, if it is allowed to exist.

V. Freemasonry-impacted politics & parallels between Spain in the 1970s & Egypt in the 2010s

In the early 70s, Spain was still a European country apart from the then European Communities, well-attached to the local traditions and religion, and the Spanish society had managed to be
– only slightly influenced by the so-called modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– hardly characterized by notions of atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism, and
– even less affected by all aspects of modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism, and Western morals.

How did this happen? The answer is simple; Generalissimo Franco kept the Freemasons out of Spain, and his secret services developed a sophisticated network to monitor the country and successfully identify any attempt of Freemasonic infiltration.

Today’s Egypt is still a Mediterranean – Middle Eastern – East African country apart from the present world order, and the great majority of the Egyptian people are well-attached to the their traditions and religion.

Until the beginning of 2011, few Egyptians would easily ascribe to
– modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism,
– deviate behavior, lifestyle and sexual mores that are now promoted and made legitimate in the West, and
– extensive and overwhelming consumerism as attested in the West.

And although the whole world has been increasingly ‘modernized’ over the past 40 years with catastrophic impact on the socio-behavioral system of vast populations worldwide, involving the collapse of traditional values and the disintegration of the family-based social model, Egypt was hardly affected. As a matter of fact, in Egypt, the new, deviate morals of the West have been hardly accepted, whereas modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism were repeatedly and extensively conditioned upon Islamic criteria.

Why did this happen? Following the collapse of the kingdom (1952), most of the Freemasons left Egypt because their financial – political interests were gravely damaged with the then launched reforms. Most of pre-1952 Egypt’s Freemasons were foreigners, so they knew that, despites their losses in Egypt, they could make it elsewhere. However, Egyptian Freemasons left too, first because their financial – political interests were also heavily hit and their social position greatly undermined, and second because, as Freemasons, they were more attached to their so-called ‘brethren’ in Satan than to their country of origin. They expected they would ensure critical assistance in another country, and they actually ensured it and prospered.

Under the successive tenures of Muhammad Naguib, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el Sadat, and Hosni Mubarak, Freemasons attempted a mild, soft and covered comeback, but they found an unfriendly environment and their activities were minimal if not none. At those days, Freemasons around the world were comfortable seeing Jehan el Sadat and Suzanne Mubarak promoting Western ideas across the Egyptian society and offering the model of a Westernized Egyptian first lady to the world mass media.

But the Egyptian society reacted quite well, and preserved their values and traditions, rejecting the widely spread sexualization and pornification of the daily life and refusing the systematic attacks against the traditional ethics, virtues and culture. What occurred in the Western societies over the last six (6) decades did not actually happen in Egypt..

And the notorious Freemasonic lodge of Heliopolis that is rather called Baron Empain Palace (in Arabic ‘qasr al baron’; in French ‘le palais hindou’ – named after Édouard Louis Joseph, Baron Empain, 1852 – 1929) remained closed.

How was possible for Spain to deviate within just 40 years up to the point of being a fully anti-Christian state that does not penalize adultery, allows hundreds of thousands of embryos to be killed annually, and approves of non-Christian marriages that are only euphemistically called ‘civil marriages’?

How Spain reached the bottom of the world’s corruption and immorality by making legitimate the homosexual marriages and the adoption of children by homosexual couples?

The answer is simple: through massive, sophisticated, multifaceted, multilayered, successive, and coordinated Freemasonic lies, misinformation, deception, and duplicity diffused in public in a carefully conceived, methodically programmed, and systematically executed manner. We can analyze few key points of the evil behavior and policies testified by king Juan Carlos, Felipe Gonzalez, and Jose Zapatero, Spain’s key evil figures – all Freemasons.

They never announced their real targets from the beginning; only after one first step was made – as deterioration of the status of Catholic Spanish identity and culture (ex. legalization of the abortion) – another was announced (ex. legalization of homosexual marriages). This already demonstrates the evil intentions of the Freemasons, and sheds light on the deep reasons that impose oath-bound secrecy to Freemasons. The hidden masters of Freemasonry know that their real targets are humanly unacceptable; that’s why they first hire new members promising them socio-professional success, second bind their members by oath, third deliver portions of the reality to them, and fourth oblige them to work for the materialization of the overall, evil plan that, had most of the Freemasons known at the very beginning, they would have never accepted to become members.

In Spain, the leading Freemasons-in charge pursued an evil policy, by using either general popular support or support acquired on one occasion in order to promote an unannounced yet secretly programmed target, and by fooling the people on diverse subjects in order to extract acceptance on a specific point that is part of the Freemasonic scheme. The latter technique is tantamount to subversion of the common sense.

When a key term and element of the local common culture and worldview within a certain society loses its significance, the entire system within which it was located is automatically degraded, and this brings collapse upon collapse for all the key terms of the cultural-behavioral system. This situation triggers an advanced decay, and the immediate consequence is the weakening of the remaining key terms of common culture and worldview of the society in question. This is the way to social decomposition and to ultimate destruction of the Mankind.

To this deterioration there is no end, except the total disintegration of the human society and its transformation to a bestial realm whereby humans are totally disconnected from the spiritual world, cut off from the nature, and left without religion, without family, without traditions, and without culture. Therein, as it is already attested in the jungle, every notion of sin is forgotten, and the earth will look pretty much like the hell as we know it through the diverse religious traditions and textual evidence.

This social disintegration is to be expected for every tyrannical, Freemasonry-controlled society, and this is exactly what has already happened to misfortunate Spain, as it had previously occurred to Italy, France, Germany, Holland, England, various other Western European countries, the US, Japan, and the countries of the British Commonwealth.

This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is now greatly supported by the Freemasonic tyrannies of the West to carry out in Egypt.

VI. What will happen to Egypt if the liberal – secular opposition gains momentum?

As underlying philosophical currents and ideological systems, the following systems will be forcefully diffused, while opponents will be ridiculed through the criminal mass media possessed and controlled by the totalitarian, bogus- democratic, liberal – secular opposition:
– theories that support the Western pseudo-democracies (liberalism, neo-conservatism, social democracy) by creating false dilemmas,
– atheism, agnosticism, Darwinism, and social amoralism, and – last but not least – a deeply anti-Islamic approach to World History as per which religions stand accused for all the maledictions that have befallen on the Mankind, and
– a wild overdose of modernism, modern technology life style, consumerism, generalized sexualization and pornification of the daily life, matched with mass tourism, free of any need of compliance with Islamic criteria (tourism will be further utilized to corrupt the Egyptian mores and moral standards)

What is to be expected from Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition’s political platform at the sociopolitical level is the following:
– Egyptian single females will be able to rent flats and apartments of their own, and receive their friends there without the neighbors having the right to react.
– Courses of religion in the Primary and Secondary Education will be abolished (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– There will be an increased westernization wave in the Egyptian Primary, Preparatory and Secondary Education.
– Religion will stop being mentioned on the Egyptian identity cards, and passports.
– Abortion will be legalized pretty soon.
– An increased number of newspapers will start publishing pictures of women in bathing suits even on the first page.
– Adultery will not be penalized anymore.
– Alcohol will be allowed to be sold in all the restaurants, cafés, and supermarkets across the country.
– Homosexuality will not be considered reprehensible anymore.
– Pornography will increase dramatically in very short time.
– The first sex shops will appear in Down Town Cairo, in Alexandria, Port Said, Luxor and Aswan, as well as across the tourist resorts in the Red Sea coast and in the Sinai.
– Tolerance will be shown for provocative public appearance of the homosexuals, the prostitutes, and the transsexuals in order to adjust the country mores – not to the Egyptian people wishes and mentality (as it is now) but – to the demands of international NGOs; this means that the still existing notion of public decency will collapse and disappear.
– There will be more female than male judges – in full violation of the expectation, the wishes, and the political ideas of the outright majority of the Egyptian people.
– It will be allowed for homosexuals to declare in public their nature, without anyone being able to discriminate them – in their professional and social life.
– Religion will be separated from the state (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– Progressively, Friday will become a fully working day, and Sunday will replace it as the weekend’s 2nd day.
– Arabic will be written in Latin characters and numbers by an increasing number of people (this is nowadays called ‘Franco-Arab’), and some groups will issue the first websites, books and newspapers in this fake writing system.
– At a later stage, and when possible reactions of the majority will be discouraged, homosexual marriages will become legal.
– Adoption of children by homosexual couples will also become legal.

I expanded mainly on socio-behavioural, cultural and moral issues, but there will be a grave deformation of the Egyptian economy and politics as well. Meanwhile, Freemasons will expand their activities, open many lodges, and try to further penetrate in the Egyptian society in order to faster corrupt it and adjust it to their regional interests and global targets.

An important parameter of economic character that has to be anticipated is the forceful abandonment of the Egyptian agriculture, which will trigger an increased exodus from the Egyptian farmlands and provinces toward the urban centers and the (already) big cities.

If the tele-guided and remote-controlled leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition manage to put obstacles to the constitutional referendum (note: the speech was given before the 15 & 22/12/2012 referendum where the voter turnout reached only 32.86%), stop the political process (note: here they proved to be successful by cancelling the announced parliamentary elections of 22 April – and runoffs up to 24 June 2013), overthrow the newly elected president and government, and finally climb to power, one has to expect that the percentage of the population working in agriculture will drop dramatically under 5% – under the vicious and false pretext of the ‘modernization’ of Egypt’s economy. The ensuing result will be a heavy dependence of Egypt on agricultural imports which will push the whole country to further debts and total disaster.

The recent examples of many heavily indebted European countries (Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, etc.) show clearly how cruelly and disastrously an indebted country is dealt with by the world’s leading financial institutions, e.g. the credit-rating agencies, the financial services companies, the asset management companies, the big banks, , and the hidden force behind those gangsters: the Freemasons. Now, in the case of a heavily indebted Egypt, there will be more levers of Freemasonic pressure, notably the colonial powers, e.g. France, England, America, and their disrespectful dependencies, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Holland, etc.

Egyptians from all the walks of life should take note, as soon as they can, of the fact that Greece’s and Cyprus’ foreign policies have been tremendously flexed after their grave economic problems exploded. Both EU-member states had – during many long decades – balanced relations with the Arab League-member states and Israel. More particularly, Greece had closer and warmer relations with the Arab League-member states, either during the tenures of C. Caramanlis as prime minister (1955 – 1963 and 1974 – 1980) or under the colonel junta (1967 – 1973) or at the times of A. Papandreou’s premiership (1981 – 1989).

Now, Cyprus has been sold out to Israel, and the two signed many agreements of economic, political and military cooperation; in an effort to jointly explore the gas resources of the Mediterranean Sea continental shelf, they seem to have even signed an anti-Turkish pact that remains secret. In its gloomy perspectives of survival, Israel tries desperately to engulf other countries, weak governments, and silly politicians, without caring about the catastrophic impact such an engulfment will have on those countries.

Greece is a bankrupt country that was not allowed to announce its bankruptcy officially; this happened because the vicious, corrupt, and demented European statesmen did not want this ‘event’ to trigger sudden, catastrophic developments in the European Union that would not be contained. That is why a multi-level effort has been undertaken, repeatedly changed, and properly re-adjusted in order to effectively postpone the announcement of the bankruptcy for the time when it will not affect Europe in anything. Meanwhile, the leader of Greece’s right-center party first visited the criminal Israeli prime minister to accept his terms and announce an alliance with the Zionist country and then was supported by the US and the EU as head of a tripartite alliance and subsequently appointed as prime minister (although his party did not have the majority, having gathered only 31% at the last elections).

If rising to power, Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will fast accumulate new debts to
a) comply with the orders of the Freemasonic institutions and governments that have systematically backed the opposition since January 2011 (and already before!) and
b) implement their economic policies, unrealistic promises, and demagogic pledges for which they need money that even now is not available in Egypt.

As the liberal – secular opposition’s leaders act similarly with their villainous and criminal patrons, their practices and policies will bring about a vast corruption, because they will appoint all their members and followers, tolerate large part of Mubarak’s nomenclature, and isolate the vast masses of population. They will try immediately to create a police-machine to support them in power, and the cities will be flooded by jobless fellahin because the destruction of agriculture will become target no 1 of a so-called democratic, liberal – secular government in Egypt.

Few months of a liberal – secular government in Egypt will finally unveil both, the secret reasons of Freemasonic support to today’s opposition and the ultimate target of the criminal Western Freemasons in Egypt. Few months of liberal – secular tyranny in Egypt will demonstrate why the Freemasonry-controlled, criminal, Western regimes abandoned their local puppet, Hosni Mubarak, and instigated the developments that took place in January – February 2011 in the Tahrir Square theater. Under Mubarak, the much wanted (by the Freemasonic masters of the world order) process of Egypt’s westernization, socio-economic corruption, social destitution, moral demolition, and national decomposition did not advance as fast as they needed. Of course, the inhuman global rulers would never trust any Egyptian Islamist party in power.

In fact, the secret Freemasonic target behind the Tahrir Square events was the definite substitution of Mubarak by some weak, ignorant and idiotic puppets of lesser importance (the ludicrous figures of El Baradei and Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes), who would speed up the process that Mubarak tried to slow down or even avert wherever he and his subordinates managed to notice it. If the Satanic masters of Freemasonry and the their puppets, e.g. the top rulers the present political world order, could automatically replace Mubarak with El Baradei, no Tahrir Square events would ever take place. That is all!

As a matter of fact, if today’s liberal – secular opposition manages in the future to climb to power in Egypt, the country will be ruled in exactly the same manner as under Mubarak, except the country’s foreign policy will be catastrophic for the national interests and the sociopolitical process will bring forth a vast and generalized destruction of the traditional values, elimination of the religious concepts, and collapse of the socio-behavioral system. An indescribable diffusion of materialistic, consumerist, pornographic ideas and practices will take place in order to eradicate any attachment to traditions, moral standards, and Islamic virtues.

Under a nefarious El Baradei – Hamdin Sabahy dictatorship, unemployment will be remedied with prostitution, and this concerns the imperiled Egyptian women not only within the context of their country, but also in a wider setup, which is made available by the monstrous Freemasonic fabrication ‘Euro-Mediterranean Partnership’ and the Satanic plan providing for a Union for the Mediterranean. The aforementioned silly and pathetic puppets will find it worthy to further integrate their country into the Euro-Satanic realm of villainous homosexual marriages and utmost sexualization.

Who promotes these contaminations worldwide?

Yahoo, MSN, Google and the other criminal Freemasonic – Zionist outfits, which already support El Baradei, Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes!

In parallel, increased agricultural imports and boosted consumerism (which translates to further imports) will unquestionably drive Egypt to its knees, and the bankruptcy will come in less than 2 years. A bankrupt Egypt will become the perfect tool at the hands of America, Europe, Israel, and their vicious, heinous and ominous ally, the colonial state of Abyssinia, e.g. Fake Ethiopia. At that time, the Nile waters conspiracy of the Freemasonic – Zionist gangsters will come to surface in all its dimensions to further function as an extra lever of pressure and ensure the final decomposition of the country.

If things reach that level, the outright majority of the Egyptian people, even if they manage to kick the so-called democratic, liberal – secular government out, will not have the chance to outmaneuver the evil plans against Egypt that the Freemasons and the Zionists have long prepared against Egypt and the valley of the Nile in general – including Sudan. That’s why it is important to keep today’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition under control, out of power, and in ramshackle, before they succeed to obtain power in Egypt.

This is the key point: beyond plans of political subversion of Egypt, beyond programs of social-behavioral and cultural disintegration of Egypt, and beyond projects of economic destruction and disastrous bankruptcy of Egypt, the Western colonial countries that are the international politics’ tools of the Freemasons attempt to harm the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.

VII. Major threats against Egypt’s national integrity

What are the major points of the Freemasonic – Zionist projects in this regard?

– Creation of troubles in Port Said, Suez, and the Sinai – serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo and the Zionist state that will find itself ‘threatened’, and this will serve as ‘venue’ for Israel to interfere.

– Creation of troubles in Halaib. Serious deterioration of the relations between Khartoum and Cairo

– Nile water troubles. Serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo, Khartoum and the Anti-African, colonial state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) because of the construction of two dams (one in Atbara River and another in the Blue Nile); with strong US-European-Israeli support, the barbaric and genocidal state of Abyssinia will declare earlier treaties about the Nile water flow as not binding.

– Serious change in the Northeast African balance of power, with Khartoum getting greater Nile share in exchange with the formation of an anti-Egyptian alliance with the Neo-Nazi state of Abyssinia

– Advanced level of diffusion of separatist ideas among Nubians in both Egypt and the Sudan

– Without Egypt’s involvement, Sudan will soon disintegrate, with first Darfur and then Kordofan seceding. Longer the US, UK, French and Abyssinian embassies stay in Khartoum, closer the end of Sudan comes. Then, the Bejas in the East (Port Sudan, Sawakin and Kessala) will revolt and demand independence. This event will affect Egypt greatly, because the Bejas will demand for them the Halaib triangle and extra territory in Egypt’ extreme Southeast (Ras Banas, Berenice) that is inhabited by Egypt’s Beja minority.

– Becoming a landlocked country, Sudan will implode; the Nubians in the North will declare independence. This development will also affect Egypt, as big money is now being diffused to promote themes and motives of the Nubian political mythology.

VIII. Focus on the world’s most Anti-Egyptian state: the genocidal state of Fake Ethiopia

At this point, I intend to expand more on this subject; the racist, Satanic regime that controls Abyssinia is the world’s most inhuman, barbaric and criminal regime. More genocides have been perpetrated in the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia over the past 150 years than in the rest of the world.

Who is responsible for this?

The Satanic directorate of Freemasonry, and the subservient countries France, England, America and Israel that in different moments supported those who have been in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

Who are in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)?

Two Semitic tribes that originate from Yemen, and crossed to Africa in repeated waves, before ca. 2500 years, e.g. the Amhara and the Tigray

Together, the Amhara and the Tigray constitute ca. 31% of the country’s total population; they basically live in the north of the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia, close to the borders with Eritrea and Sudan. The cruelest among them resettled in the Occupied Oromo capital city Finfinne (that bears officially the genocidal name ‘Addis Ababa’, a name given by the inhuman and Anti-African invaders), which is located at the colonial state’s geographical center, which is in reality the territory of Occupied Oromia. However, many Amhara and fewer Tigray are Muslims, whereas the rest are fake Christians (called Tewahedo – Monophysitic). It is in fact the Tewahedo fake Christian Amhara and Tigray who control the country of Fake Ethiopia. They are not more than 17% of the country’s total population.

The historical area of Abyssinia, prior to the Freemasonry-promoted expansion, was very small – less than half of Egypt’s Delta. It is a mountainous, arid territory. There was located the Amharas’ and Tigrays’ small and barbaric kingdom that was disdained by all Muslims across Eastern Africa after it was formed, around 700 years ago (1270).

Only after 1850, with the systematic and multifaceted support of the English and the French colonials, i.e. the servile tools of the global Freemasonic policy, the useless and tiny Abyssinian kingdom started expanding at the detriment of many great African kingdoms, notably those of the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Afars, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Agaws, the Somalis of Ogaden, and others.

How the Freemasonic gangsters of England and France helped the barbaric, incestuous, and inhuman tribes of Amhara and Tigray?

a) The English and the French colonials sold plenty of guns to them, and encouraged them to make war on the rest.

b) They managed to block any arms sales to the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Somalis of Ogaden, and the rest, and

c) At the time England and France continued their Anti-African colonial wars in Sudan under the filthy and fallacious pretext ‘Abolition of slavery’, the two criminal states calmly allowed the Abyssinians to make a very profitable business by selling slaves and buying guns – to use them in the genocides that they were encouraged by the English and the French diplomats and military to perpetrate, and which they provenly perpetrated. Only the aforementioned truth is enough to show how vicious, duplicitous and evil are the gangsters who impersonate the diplomats, the agents, the scholars and the statesmen of England and France, and who are Freemasons in their majority.

After forming their colonial state (over the period 1840 – 1955), the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians preserved their monstrous country, Fake Ethiopia, through continuous, multileveled genocides that involved massacres of dozens of millions of subjugated people – and this is something that the Freemasonry-controlled newspapers of France, England, America, Canada, Australia, etc. have never mentioned, whereas the criminal, freemasonic TV channels of falsehood, BBC, CNN, NBC, Al Jazira, Arabiya, and their likes have kept, even until now, under silence.

The filthy political mythology and the related literature of the Amhara-Tigray Abyssinian tyranny is essential for every Egyptian to read, study, analyze, and assess as imminent and lethal threat against Egypt.

While infiltrating other countries, the Abyssinians methodically promote the culture of their barbaric, incestuous and filthy tribe that knows no notion of real faith, integrity, family, honesty, humanity, and honor. There is practically speaking no marriage among them; every man and woman can live together and separate at any time; they practice black magic extensively; many of them belong to a filthy group called Rastafarians who believe that the former bogus-king Haile Selassie was the Messiah and Jesus Christ reincarnate!!! They have many filthy practices that they keep secret; they are all addicted to drugs (cannabis in particular), but they are recognizable through their dreadlocks and their favorite colors yellow, green and red that are those of the flag of Fake Ethiopia.

Dreadlocks and the Abyssinian flag’s colours have recently infiltrated Egypt, and it would be crucial for the Islamic movements of Egypt to prohibit them, persecute the users, identify the traces of their contacts, and finally cut every connection these users may have with countries abroad.

Rastafarians appear to be a small religious group that first started in Jamaica (there are now ca. 100000 Rastafari and affiliates in the island nation) and still has few members scattered across the world (ca. 1 million people, mainly in Abyssinia); however, the reality is different. The Rastafarians as an instrumental Satanic sect; they defame the main historical religions of the world, like Islam, Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, and they serve locally as substitute to the fake Tewahedo Christianity of Abyssinia, and globally as support to the Freemasonic religious formations of Protestant Christianity (another heretical group) and Zionist Judaism (a vicious and villainous deviation from Orthodox Judaism). They are greatly involved in politics, and in this case, a good example is offered by the criminal gangster Jendayi Frazer, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, heading the Bureau of African Affairs, who was a key Rastafarian and promoted Anti-African policies and strategies of the worst sort.

Rastafarians manage to deceitfully attract sympathy as African originals whereas their faith is the absolute rejection of all African traditions and religions; using typical Marketing methods, they make of the show business (notably Bob Marley, and the entire reggae music, but not only) a key tool of their infiltration policy among unsuspicious populations across the world – and more particularly among targeted countries, like Sudan and Egypt. But, look at the following:

Rastafarians’ god is named Jah – just the first half of the Hebrew god Jahveh.

Rastafarians accept the Trinity as revealed in Haile Selassie pre-ascension name Ras Tafari (that they call the ‘power of the trinity’).

The perfect world or the Paradise for the materialist, godless Rastafarians is already called Zion! They believe they will achieve to live in it, if their barbaric and antihuman contamination is spread over sizeable parts of Eastern Africa and subsequently proclaimed as state religion.

Rastafarians accept as holy an execrable, filthy trash, i.e. a purely Satanic text of false historical claims that is called ‘Kebra Negast’. In it, the world’s history is viciously altered to fit Abyssinian – Zionist interests to the detriment of all – Christianity, Islam, Africa and the Mankind in general. Kebra Negast is an incredible forgery written by villainous and paranoid authors under fully demonic guidance. One can easily describe it as Satan’s bible.

In Kebra Negast and in other execrable texts of theirs, Rastafarians attempted to usurp the tradition of Queen of Sheba (Balqis) from Yemen. They have fallaciously associated it with Abyssinia, and they subsequently added tons of lies in order to justify their top target, namely the control of Sudan and Egypt by them, and the split of both countries’ territory between Israel and Fake Ethiopia.

Part of the vicious Rastafarian plan of Eastern Africa’s pornification, social decomposition, and moral degradation was the usurpation of the fair name of Ethiopia, which was an Ancient Greek and Latin name for the Kushitic state of Sudan immediately south of Egypt, with capital first at Karima (then Napata – for the period 800 – 500 BCE) and then at Bagrawiyah (then Meroe – for the period 450 BCE – 370 CE). The Ancient Sudanese state, which was named Ethiopia, was culturally – ethnically – linguistically unrelated to the Axumite Abyssinia which sheltered the first Yemenites who crossed to Africa mainly in the second half of the first millennium BCE, and who happen to be the ancestors of the Amhara and Tigray, the cruel tribes that rule tyrannically the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia. In no case, can Abyssinia be called Ethiopia, and this should be the basis of a Sudanese – Egyptian alliance against Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia). The only country that could rightfully be named ‘Ethiopia’ is Sudan.

Rastafarians deliberately call the entire Africa ‘Zion’!

Actually, the rest of the world is their enemy, and they call it ‘Babylon’ in a fraudulent effort of fallacious utilization of the old defeat of Judah and exile at Babylonia. But this makes the entire Islam part of Babylon, which is sheer distortion of both, historical truth and political reality.

In another forged statement of theirs, Rastafarians claim that they are the real Children of Israel!

The link between Fake Ethiopia and Israel is highlighted by the use of the title ‘Lion of Judah’ and by Rastafarians’ villainous goal to repatriate to their fictional Mount Zion. Even in Jamaica, they dirtied a place by naming it ‘Mount Zion’. Here one can remember the wicked songs by Bob Marley ‘Zion Train’ and ‘Iron Lion Zion’; it is to be remembered that in a degenerate manner, and contrarily to Islam’s moral orders and Egypt’s national interests, Amr Diab sang in Arabic few hits by Bob Marley.

In an insolence proportioned to their wickedness, Rastafarians propagate that Amharic will be the language of the Paradise, reject the idea that the heaven is in the sky, and place their fake paradise in Abyssinia. They are absolutely materialist in their theory because they believe that in the Hereafter, humans will have their physical bodies. This is an alarming warning to all the nations of Eastern Africa, either independent or subjugated: Rastafarians’ fake paradise will be the African nations’ ultimate hell.

Little matters whether the Rastafarians have the tacit support of the Freemasonic masters of the present global order. It the Rastafarians manage to achieve their plans, this will achieved only because of the African nations’ lack of foresightedness.

Quite ludicrously but also quite meaningfully, one group of Rastafarians is called ‘Twelve Tribes of Israel’.

Rastafarians justify their addiction to cannabis by referring and altering verses of the Hebrew Bible, and the Revelation; they also justify their dreadlocks in the same manner.

Finally, by supporting Afro-centrism (which should be top task for Egypt’s and Sudan’s academia, diplomats and intellectuals), they appear as the champions of Africa, exactly as the Freemasons want them to be, thus keeping Egypt and Sudan at the level of the academically, intellectually and educationally colonized countries that keep disastrously propagating the fake Greco-Romano-centric dogma of History that the French and English Freemasons and so-called Hellenists produced in the first place.

IX. Colonial academic falsehood promoted by both, Mubarak’s regime and the liberal – secular opposition, at the detriment of Egypt’s national interests

It is therefore time for us to examine now how much Mubarak’s academic – educational system damaged Egypt’s interests, through the promotion of colonial academic falsehood, and how the same will happen if Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition rises in power.

Ever since Napoleon and his Savants of the Institut de France arrived in Egypt, and following Egypt’s real secession from the Ottoman Empire and submission to effective colonial and Anti-Islamic rule which was nominally executed by the Freemason Muhammad Ali, Napoleon’s disciple in Satanism, Egypt’s educational and academic institutions were progressively adjusted and fully attuned to Euro-centric, racist, colonial historical falsehood.

This is a complete system of historical forgery that presents the Ancient Greek civilization as central to the entire world, exaggerates the importance of Greek and Roman presence in Africa, and places in Ancient Greece and Rome the origin of the modern European civilization. At the same time, the said system passes under silence the vast, enduring, determinant, multifaceted, and overwhelming impact of the ancient Oriental and African civilizations (notably the Egyptian civilization) on the formation of Ancient Greece, Rome, Christian Europe, and Modern Europe. Critical historical developments and processes, such as the extensive diffusion of Oriental, Persian, and Egyptian cultures and religions across the Roman Empire, are kept unknown to the average people (although experts are fully aware of the reality).

The historical forgery of Greco-Romano-centrism portrays the History of the Orient, Asia, and Africa as lower, marginal and unimportant if compared to the past of the West.

But by fully diffusing and duly imposing this false system across Egypt, the successive Egyptian administrations of the 19th and the 20th century, as well as the westernized Egyptian academia gave a disastrous picture of Egypt to other African and Oriental nations. They looked to them as totally subservient to the European and the American colonials. This development generated an antipathy for Egypt among Africans, and this feeling was progressively transformed into contempt and hatred, following the ceaseless Anti-Egyptian propaganda of the heinous diplomats and agents of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).

Contrarily, by allying itself with countries, universities and movements that promote Afro-centrism, Fake Ethiopia tries to gain points and influence among unsuspicious, gullible Africans. This situation will continue, because Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition, if it rises in power, will be deceived by their own masters and promoters, who will first ask them to continue the same academic –educational falsehood that harms Egypt, Africa and Islam altogether.

At the political level, if Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition rises to power, their present supporters will deploy a great effort to minimize to the secular – liberal government of Egypt the possible damage Fake Ethiopia can do to Egypt, thus offering valuable time to the cruel Neo-Nazi rulers of Addis Ababa to advance in their plans, particularly at the level of the Nile water flow. Being cheated by their own promoters, Egypt’s liberal – secular parties and politicians constitute certainly the greatest internal danger for the country and all the Egyptians.

By being deeply anchored in Western and pro-Western schemes, ideas, theories and practices, the leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition clearly demonstrate that they did not make a momentary alliance, but they are totally tied to Western guidance, and this proves that they will never have the ability to properly establish the always necessary criticism of the West. These political figures will not be able to distinguish between West’s interests and Egypt’s interests, and much less effectively defend their country at all levels.

Where does all this bring us?

It is clear that a liberal – secular government in Egypt will speed up the process of Egypt’s disintegration at all levels, national included.

X. Another dimension of threats to Egypt’s national integrity and physical existence

One has to complete the picture; the secession of the Sinai, the separation of Halaib and Egypt’s southeastern confines to serve the project providing for a Red Sea Beja state, and the independence of Nubia may look minimal or even unimportant, if one examines details through an unconventional viewpoint.

Even an eventual division of Egypt into two countries, Muslim and Christian, can be attested in the global mass media, and in some US-based Coptic portals. At this point, I have to stress that this threat should be taken seriously by every Egyptian; it is not a joke. Wherever there is a discussion about an eventual development that looks incredible from a first viewpoint, one must be sure that behind the discussion, there are hidden and real interests and that a substantive profit is anticipated by those who push toward this eventual development. In addition, one must take into consideration that projects that may have advanced very slowly for decades can suddenly get accelerated and be implemented within an unexpectedly short time.

But unfortunately, for today’s Egypt, evil circles have planned worse than the aforementioned; and this is even more serious, because it does concern merely the national integrity of the country, but its very physical existence! It relates to the very existence of the valley of the Nile, as it has always been known through millennia.

Before going ahead, I must point out that I don’t consider the expression of a threat as an ominous event that already took place. No! A threat is just a threat; not an event. But it can be materialized. And there lies the importance of a threat. If the threat, its sources, its factors, and its execution are identified, the threat can be addressed and averted; and in this case, the threat is not really dangerous anymore. But if the threat is not identified, if the execution of a threat is a matter of catastrophic oversight, and if the threatened entity continues living as if nothing happens, then we have to be sure that the threat will be materialized and the threatened entity will be submitted to its fate.

What is this threat about?

– A strange threat that is repeated in the mouths, in the speeches, in the texts of the worst enemies of Egypt

– A strange threat that is related with apocalyptic texts, with holy books of different peoples, notably the Old Testament

– A strange threat that some consider as prophesied long ago but able to be materialized only after the 1960s, because of the erection of a huge construction project – the demolition of which would entail the physical annihilation of the valley of the Nile

– A strange threat that can be materialized only now, because of the existence of advanced high technology – of which only few people today have a vague idea

– A strange threat that brings forth the physical annihilation of the land in an unprecedented way

This is certainly something that the people, the leading organizations, and the government of the threatened country must take very seriously, and fast react by proper, concerted action.

I should however add that this threat is nothing new; it was widely discussed among various circles in the past, although these discussions were never highlighted by the global mass media. At the time, prophecy experts and analysts or other theoreticians involved did not have it easy to explain the way by which the said prophecy would be materialized in the future. However, more recently, after 1965, several biblical interpreters came up with fresh, and more illuminated explanations.

Customarily, the threat is portrayed as a statement originally included in the holy book of the Ancient Hebrews, the Torah (Old Testament). But there have been plenty of geo-strategic implications, nationalistic attachments, side views, recent foretelling, odd oracles, political visions, and chauvinistic omen that further illustrated different approaches to and viewpoints of the statement. The subject may be vast to expand thereon here, but I intend to show key political ramifications.

A relatively recent presage was mentioned in the narrative of the Russian Military Officer, Explorer, and Orthodox Monk Alexander Bulatovich who was the tsar’s envoy to Abyssinia during the years 1896 – 1899 and carried out there many excursions, observations and explorations that he later wrote down in a voluminous opus. The narrative is included in the chapter about the family of the emperor.

As a matter of fact, this chapter is of great importance today for the diplomatic and national security services of Egypt and the Sudan, because the text reveals in detail what exactly the filthy, rancorous and wicked Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians have so well and so long tried to hide.

This chapter reveals that the regime, the elites and the upper classes of these incestuous and barbarous tribes, namely the Amhara and the Tigray, have persistently acted after a secret program (that they call “prophecy” because of their sick, abnormal and degenerate mind) to destroy Egypt and Sudan, and thus expand their cannibalistic tyranny throughout East Africa. Their ulcerous antipathy of Islam, their Anti-Coptic odium, their Anti-African hatred, their complete devotion to Satan, who is the real master of their incestuous and lawless society, and their desire to expand their rule throughout Eastern Africa is highlighted in the following excerpt:

“In one of the prophecies of Raguil to Atye Zadyngylyu (he received revelations in his sleep and then wrote them down), it is said that a king from the north will be with a king of Ethiopia one in spirit and one in heart. In another prophecy of Angel Auriel to Sahle Selassie, it is said that a king of the north and of Jerusalem will meet with a king of Ethiopia in Mysyr (Egypt) and will conquer Egypt. After this, they will divide among them all the land”.

It is essential to bring in mind that at the time this text was written there was no state of Israel and the entire territory of Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Caliphate.

The above text plainly testifies to the monstrous and inhuman nature of the genocidal Abyssinian state. Taking into consideration that the text was not written by a scientific explorer or a political philosopher but by the last tsar’s envoy, who had also the task to offer an alternative to the Abyssinian – English relations and increase Russia’s influence in the area, one can realize through the lines of the text the extent of the inhumanity and the evil deeds perpetrated by the monsters of Abyssinia over the invaded and occupied lands. Of course, these deeds were carried out with the approval of the English and the French, i.e. the colonial powers that never regretted, never repented, never apologized for their African Holocaust. These countries and their accomplices (euphemistically called allies) are the real supporters of the Egyptian secular- liberal opposition, and their support is only due to the continuation and advancement of the same murderous policies of which the present Egyptian secular- liberal opposition will be the next victim if they happen to rise in power.

The evil eschatological dreams of Greater Ethiopia threaten not only Egypt and the Sudan, but also other neighboring countries, such as Somalia and Eritrea, and more than the rest, all the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), e.g. the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Kaffas, the Shekachos, the Hadiyas, the Kambaatas, the Agaws, the Wolayitas and others, who also fight for their independence.

The diplomats and the administrators, the academia and the intellectuals, the imams and the priests, the deputies and the ministers of the aforementioned countries, and the liberation leaders and activists of the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia must study and fully understand the insightful documentation available in this book, which was published by the Russian explorer before 110 years. Only then, they will be able to properly assess the detrimental dangers that are dangling over their heads.

In and by itself, Alexander Bulatovich’s With the Armies of Menelik constitutes good reason for the entire world, and more specifically for all African and Islamic countries, to be greatly preoccupied with the source of every regional trouble and instability: the villainous Amhara and Tigray (Tewahedo) Monophysitic Abyssinian tribes that have perpetrated the world’s most abhorrent genocides, ruling tyrannically over the lands they invaded and over the nations they subjugated since the middle of the 19th century.

The fact that the uncivilized Abyssinians have lawlessly and shamelessly usurped the name of Ethiopia, which historically belongs to Sudan and to the Kushitic African nations, like the Oromos, the Sidamas, and the Afars, is only the top of the iceberg. They did so in order to falsely claim what is not theirs, and what has never been theirs: the Nile and the adjacent lands that the great river crosses.

The developments that are planned to trigger the above discussed ‘division’ of the territories of Egypt and Sudan (then named Mysyr) between Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and Israel involve something that was unknown in 1896: the destruction of Aswan High Dam and the elimination of life from the valley of the Nile and the Delta region for a period of 40 years.

Many modern preachers who belong to fake Christian denominations fabricated by the Freemasons, like the Evangelicals, often speak about this point, referring to the Old Testament and analyzing selected excerpts. What is described in those excerpts as a potentiality of divine punishment administered to the old times’ polytheistic wickedness is now shamelessly misinterpreted as pending punishment ‘due’ to modern times’ Egyptian Anti-Israelism, which in fact is a mere Anti-Ashkenazism or Anti-Khazarianism.

This effort of misinterpretation shows that cruel regimes’ and gangsters’ political wishes are easily linked to Biblical excerpts, as the evilness of the devious necessarily involves usurpation of God’s words. This illuminates the Satanic nature of the Freemasonry, and of their evil outfits, namely the fake Christian Tewahedo Monophysitic Abyssinians, the fake Jewish Zionists (Ashkenazi Khazarians), and the radically pro-Zionist, fake Christian Evangelicals.

The subject is highly dangerous for Egypt as it is linked to the entire issue of Nile River water dispute between Egypt, Sudan and Abyssinia. This only underscores the reality that longer the secular – liberal opposition is allowed to act in Egypt, fewer will be the chances of the Egyptian people to get plain information, assess the existing threats, and safely and timely take action. The secular – liberal opposition has become the perfect Freemasonic tool of destruction of the Nile valley, as it has only engulfed Egypt into internal strives that prevent the country from preparing for a faceoff with Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and from outmaneuvering the aforementioned evil Freemasonic plot.

Muslims welcome the election of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio as Pope Francis I

jorge-mario-bergoglioFor almost 55 years after the death of Pope Pius XII (9 October 1958), Vatican became the theatre of fierce strives that tarnished the global image of Catholicism and, in general, Christianity. However, backstage conflicts around the Sancta Sedes were not unrelated to what happened in the daily lives of hundreds of millions of Catholics, and finally affected, in a broader sense, the destiny of the entire Mankind.

The Second Vatican Ecumenical Council (1962-1965, Vatican II) catastrophically altered the identity of Catholic faith and Christian theology, while becoming the key tool for Freemasonic – Zionist infiltration in Vatican, and in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church at large. Several Catholic orders were dragged into the notorious council at the time, as the appeal of the announcement was great, but the end result proved only to be calamitous.

Back in the late 50s, the Freemasonic – Zionist infiltration in Vatican was difficult to perceive, and even more difficult to oppose. The reason is simple: it was a unique case and an unprecedented event in the almost 2-millennium long history of the papal institution. To this development are however due all the troubles and calamities that the Catholic Church has encountered over the recent decades. The main motif behind the slow process of Freemasonic infiltration that had started much earlier (already in the late 18th century) and only culminated after the end of WW II was not mere power and authority, but the corruption and the destruction of the Catholic Church and the Christian religion.

The systematic desecration perpetrated against the Holy See in today’s villainous Freemasonic – Zionist mass media (particularly the online portals, e.g. the likes of Yahoo, Google, MSN, etc.) did not fall from the sky on an unprepared soil. The minds of the average people in the Western world, its dependencies, and the periphery have been methodically bombarded during decades with profane material in a uniquely systematic and utterly unprecedented manner in the History of the Mankind – every time more poisonous material, every time at a deteriorated level, every time with a greater number of victims (i.e. innocent people who naively enough believed in the covertly Anti-Christian and deeply antihuman, Freemasonic campaign, which – notice this! – was never identified as such). In fact, Christians, Muslims, and almost all the adepts of all the other systematic religions in the world do not believe any more in their respective religions in the same original manner their ancestors did two centuries ago, because the average mindset of almost all the people worldwide has meanwhile been altered without them even noticing it – let alone reacting against it. Through progressive, multifaceted, sophisticated deception, the entire world was held captive.

This reality is not unrelated to the destructive plans Satan devised against the Mankind since times immemorial; yet, about them, we were repeatedly warned through so many and so diverse Holy Scriptures in different periods. And the Mankind, despite all the fratricide wars and the immoral deviations attested every now and then, had always managed to constrain and contain the lethal threat. Muslim or Christian, all true believers, the likes of Ibn Hazm (994 – 1064) or St Francis Xavier (1506 – 1552), knew that any plan devised by Satan against the Mankind is futile as long as human mind remains intact and integral; that’s why they emphasized on moral philosophy and contemplation, meditation and self-improvement. Ignatius Loyola’s spiritual exercises are not very different from the proceedings of a true Muslim’s Greater Jihad whereby purification of the sins and true humanity are sought after.

However, by affecting the mindset of vast populations worldwide and, in parallel, immobilizing the head of the only institution that could vividly react to these destructive plans, the forces of evil obtained a severe deterioration of the conditions of human life. Freemasonic – Zionist infiltration in Vatican did not go unnoticed of course, and by this I don’t refer only to the Sedevacantists, and all those who strongly and repeatedly (1958, 1963, and 1978) supported the noble cause of Genoese Cardinal Siri’s candidacy.

Insiders like Father Malachi Martin made state of Satan’s presence in Vatican. This word is a term and a code that Christian laymen and adepts of other faiths cannot easily assess and properly interpret; in fact, by ‘Satan’, Father Martin meant ‘Satan’s children’, e.g. the Freemasons and the Zionists. Of course, for anyone who knows that the material universe is not a standalone creation and that it would instantly fall apart without the continual, multileveled and overwhelming interference of the spiritual universe, it goes without saying that simple, physical presence of ‘Satan’s children’ in Vatican automatically involves spiritual presence of the Fallen Archangel and his legions who ceaselessly interact with the incestuous and villainous black ‘brotherhood’.

People with little insight who usually fall victims of the global mass media propaganda have an inclination to view the above points and any similar description with a certain dose of reserve; yet, observing developments and changes occurred over the span of the last 55 years, one is certainly offered the possibility to make the correct comparisons, and thus finally conclude that, through Vatican II, the Roman Catholic Church was dragged into an explicitly Anti-Christian world without reacting.

What I am saying may sound like the title of the ultimate, unfinished, and therefore unpublished book of the late Father Malachi Martin, but every perspicacious and impartial observer would admit that prior to Vatican II, it would be impossible for anyone to imagine that the Roman Catholic Church would not mobilize the faithful Christians against the deeply Anti-Christian and increasingly immoral, materialistic, atheistic, de-spiritualized, and dehumanized life style of the modern Western societies, their dependencies and the periphery.

In real terms, Christians are now being held captive within the degraded, altered, inhuman, and Anti-Christian modern societies that prevailed first in the West, before being thence projected onto the rest of the world – a development that was only facilitated and sped up by the earlier undertaken systematic colonization, and by the more recently enforced socio-economic, cultural and educational globalization of the earth. Of course, Christians are not the only captives of today’s Satanic world; Muslims and adepts of other faiths are held captives too. In reality, the entire Mankind has been held captive.

But the ingenuity of immobilizing the Catholic hierarchy had a critical impact; it offered a great privilege to the masters of human desecration, e.g. the Freemasons and the Zionists: that of easily defaming and discrediting any voice that would be raised against their evil plans from the periphery of the Western world! This is due to the fact that with the Catholics immobilized, with the Orthodox quasi-eliminated under the Soviet regimes, with the Protestants and their offspring under full Freemasonic control, and with the real Jews (Sephardim) under Zionist terror, no one was left in the West to protest against the evil plan that was methodically, comprehensively and masterfully worked out in the 2nd half of the 20th century. Any voice of opposition would thus come only from outside the Western world, mainly from the Islamic world, and as such, it would be easily discredited as ‘radical’, ‘extremist’, untrustworthy, outrageous, etc. (here you can add the long list of adjectives used by the fully untrustworthy, definitely criminal, and gravely antihuman institutions of the global mass media, the likes of CNN, Jazeera, New York Times, Le Monde, Washington Post, Le Figaro, Arabia, ABC, Los Angeles Times, NBC, Spiegel, Frankfurter Allgemeine, etc).

Of course, the political, economic, educational, and religious institutions of the Islamic world and their outfits worldwide had already been under an enduring, colonial control, ever since the Ottoman Empire was first decomposed (179) and finally eliminated (1921), but the fear of an impending revelation of, and opposition to, the evil Freemasonic and Zionist plans was always present in the minds of the criminals who have ruled the world; fear of an impending chastisement is the permanent destiny of all sinners. Finally, after 1978, leading agencies of the Anti-Christian forces that hijacked Christianity in the West, namely the CIA, the British and the French intelligence, the Mossad, and others, forged their own bogus-Islamist groups and institutionalized their criminal propaganda through the control they have exercised over the global mass media that are all viciously Anti-Christian and Anti-Islamic of nature.

Modernism is indeed an abnormal and inhuman situation that was enforced upon the entire Mankind over the past decades, without anyone perceiving it, let alone denouncing it! An exclusive, unbalanced, lifelong focus on materialist issues, a catastrophic reduction of the man to a mere consumer, the emergence of a counterfeit mankind made out of otherwise empty minds disastrously swollen through incitement of materialist ambitions, an extraordinary and overwhelming deviation in issues pertaining to gender, sex, and reproduction, the collapse of the traditional social cell, i.e. the family through the formation of sickly superfluous and individualistic egos, the advanced disintegration of the moral values of the society, and the calamitous elimination of the traditional virtues from the public and private education, the gradual and unstoppable transformation of the human society into a Godless, spiritless realm of faithless, non-thinking employees whereby everything is valued as per the material profit, the destitution of the human soul through the formation of a deviate, money-centered mindset, the quasi-completed detachment of the simple man from the spiritual world, the vicious divide between the unhealthy life in expanding, inhuman agglomerations and the deceitful modern medical industry, the explosion of the crime in every sense, the incredible financial power acquired by those who brought about the aforementioned destructive social parameters, and a great number of other, equally impermissible and antihuman, conditions of life would not have formed the world in which we live without meeting fierce opposition, had Vatican II not taken place.

If the Catholic Church had maintained the originality of Christian morality and fought for it, the multifaceted developments that brought about the present Anti-Christian world would have been met with resistance, the ensuing debate would have earlier revealed the Satanic face and the antihuman plots of the Freemasonic lodges, and the course of History would have certainly been different.

As a matter of fact, the world Pope Francis I is met with in 2013 is not at all the same as the world Pope Pius XII left in 1958. Who would dare speak of homosexual marriages in 1958? Not even the homosexuals themselves! Why? Because most of them certainly realized that their uncontrolled sexual tendency constituted a sin and if made public, a crime against the mankind! By now, moral hindrances have been removed through the destructive work of the Freemasonic outfits, the mindsets of the homosexuals have been filled with extreme arrogance, the mindsets of the normal people have been flexed through materialistic concepts, and the mindsets of the few remaining true Christian believers have become accustomed with inertia toward the problem. This situation consists in an abnormality that needs to be rectified, if Christianity is to survive and not to disintegrate into a Late Antiquity libertarian Gnosticism evolving around a fake, sexually eccentric ‘Jesus’. Vatican II is therefore an unbearable burden that, if not removed, will certainly drive the Catholic Church from coma to death very soon. Redemption must come fast through chastisement, ectomy if need be.

It must all start with an accurate, clear, and solemn declaration that will illuminate the tragic circumstances in which Christianity is found in today’s world. This is the top priority. To be truthful, reliable and trustworthy, Pope e;ectFrancis I must tell Christians worldwide the scrupulously hidden truth:

The conditions of life for all the Christians worldwide in 2013 are far worse than they have ever been at any moment in History, after the Edict of Thessalonica (380 CE) that proclaimed Trinitarian Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire.

In reality, Christians today live under conditions similar to those existing before the Edict of Milan (313 CE) or Galerius’ Edict of Toleration (311 CE). Certainly, Christians are not nowadays physically persecuted as they were under Diocletian and other earlier Roman emperors; however, their beliefs, faith, traditions, ethics, virtues and concept of life are being targeted, persecuted, altered, corrupted, and eradicated much more gravely now than they were during the 3rd century of the Christian Era.

Even worse, Christian beliefs, faith, traditions, ethics, virtues and concept of life are today extensively ridiculed up to the point that their theoretical defense either becomes impossible because of today’s world’s relativism or exposes the defenders to contemptuous laughter because of the generalized and unopposed (as per above) imposition of Anti-Christian theories, ideas, systems, concepts, principles, lifestyles and schemes by the forces of Evil, i.e. the Freemasons and the Zionists.

Even at those days, the princes of the Christian religion were not obliged to become ludicrous tourists and pay visits to synagogues, temples and edifices belonging to other religions. This is however what the Freemasonic Anti-popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI did, thus terribly tarnishing the global image of Christianity and shamefully reducing their religion to a mere secondary ideology or ancillary theoretical system.

To put it otherwise, 20th century Freemasons and Zionists proved to be far more successful in their Anti-Christian practices, policies and strategies than the cruelest Anti-Christian emperors of the three first centuries of Christian History.

Even if we study the subject, making broader comparisons and taking as example the Iranian Sassanid Empire, which was notorious for the persecution of the Aramaean Christian populations in Mesopotamia, Syria, and elsewhere, we will admit that the Christian Church of the Orient was not attacked at its core, and there were no archimandrites, bishops and archbishops involved in child sexual abuse, homosexuality, financial corruption, materialism, etc. Even more so, daily life in the Sassanid Empire, as well as in the Roman Empire, was not permeated by extensive pornography, consumerism, materialism, and other similar deviations that are overwhelmingly attested in our world and contribute to the systematic eradication of the Christian values and sense of life.

Viewed from an Islamic perspective, the above observations become even more preoccupying. It is clear that the aforementioned troublesome situation is not limited within the Western or the Christian world; it has by now expanded all over the world, sweeping all the religions, faiths, cultures and traditions away. It does therefore concern the Islamic world as well whereby all the symptoms of modernism appeared with almost the same strength and penetrability.

Similarly with the Catholic world, Islam was penetrated by evil simulators who have impersonated sheikhs, imams, theologians, intellectuals and activists; they now merely wait their time to play the next act of Freemasonic theatre ascribed to them by their remote masters. The time is not far off when child sexual abuse and homosexuality will explode within the Islamic world pretty much in the same manner they already have within the Catholic Church. This will take uniquely gigantic proportions particularly within the corrupt, perfidious and monstrous realm of Saudi Arabia, reaching levels beyond any imagination.

As a matter of fact, any perspicacious observer would easily discern that everywhere, either in the Catholic Church or in the Islamic world or within different environments, the symptoms of both, Modernism and corruption, appear always in the same order within a society. This point demonstrates that these developments are due to the same reason and have the same origin, namely the Freemasonic – Zionist infiltration into the ealier intact society. Following the diffusion of elements of Modernism in a society infiltrated by Freemasons, the subsequent corruption of the local social order takes place, although that order had prevailed over centuries and centuries without any grave change or alteration.

This situation is also related with the acceptance of the modern technological inventions that, Freemasonic of inspiration and use, totally contradict all faiths, Christian, Islamic and other, as they indirectly but steadfastly let a different, fake god be preached. It then involves acceptance of the present global socioeconomic and political order, which is also the result of Freemasonic scheming against the Mankind, but constitutes full rejection of the quintessence of Human History. The human being was never targeted, exploited, and distorted to this extent within the context of any Christian and pre-Christian kingdom anywhere in the world. For this reason, noble and royal policies have been systematically denigrated as ‘despotic’ or ‘authoritarian’ by the Freemasonic educational agents who impersonate the appointed and controlled academia of evilness and deception.

Fighting against the Freemasonic Lernaean Hydra in today’s globalized world may prove to be far more difficult than just cleaning the Augean stables in the Curia and elsewhere among the Catholic dioceses. Being aware of the existing stakes and knowing perfectly well that not much time is left to their evil master and diabolical ‘great architect of the universe’, the Freemasons are now preparing a formidable clash between the Christian and the Islamic worlds, being determined to drag billions of innocent believers, gullible followers, and unsophisticated fanatics into the trap of an apocalyptic war that has been planned to definitely annihilate both parts, irreversible discredit both religions, and successfully promote a fake, Gnostic-like system that will serve as prelude to the last deception of all: the Freemasonic – Zionist Messiah, a loathsome figure already encountered by Father Malachi Martin in 1996.

Viewed from a Catholic perspective, the Islamic world remains – still in 2013 – a Terra Incognita. This is detrimental to both sides. The abnormal situation of reciprocal ignorance and mutual unfamiliarity serves catastrophically the Freemasonic scheme. One can safely claim that during the Christian Ages (shamefully denigrated to Dark Ages by the Freemasonic evilness), due to the straight diplomatic contacts among Freemasonry-free caliphs, emperors and, in general, diverse heads of states, thanks to the circulation / exchange of many manuscripts and to the effectuation of many translations, and because of the continuous commercial exchanges, the Christian and the Islamic worlds, although at times very antagonistic, knew one another far better than they do now.

Perspicacious Catholic observers and erudite scholars, who happen to correctly evaluate the nefarious involvement of Freemasonry in the imposition of today’s Anti-Christian context across the Western world, have to see the Islamic world in its real dimensions and conditions, and not through the falsifying Freemasonic lenses of the Orientalist academia.

It would only be normal for a Catholic observer to wonder why the diverse religious heads of the Muslims did not undertake what the Freemasonry-hijacked papacy (1958 – 2013, with the interval of 33 days in 1978) was determined to avert, namely a steadfast, comprehensive opposition to the Freemasonic evilness of Modernism in all of its dimensions, technology to politics to culture.

Here, the answer would be quite revelatory of what happened within the Islamic world over the past 200-250 years. In this regard, the colonial involvement proved to be the method by which the Freemasonic lodges managed to totally disfigure the Islamic Heritage and the mindset of almost all the Muslim populations all over the world.

The block of Freemasonic agents that consisted of diplomats, military agents, colonial administrators in protectorates, businessmen, researchers, explorers, journalists, academia, hypothetically innocent travelers, traders and artists managed to setup – in various detached provinces of the Islamic world – local, treacherous establishments manned with corrupted and loathed individuals that systematically promoted the loss of the indigenous identity in every sense, the betrayal of the traditional virtues, the abandonment of the long-established ethics, the dissolution of the cultural integrity, the disloyalty to the rightful rulers of the colonized territories, the immoral compromise with alien concepts, principles, values and ideas, the absurd and shameful conformity with the colonial reality in every sense, and the subsequent acceptance of every further demand of the colonial rulers without prior thought, due consideration, proper evaluation, free choice, and national pride.

While targeting the Catholic Church within the context of the Christian world during the 18th, the 19th and the 20th centuries, the inhuman, incestuous, and paranoid gangsters of the Freemasonic lodges promoted the elaboration of the Orientalist falsehood in Europe and North America, and the ensuing projection of the bogus-academic ‘inferences’ and ‘conclusions’ onto the local level of the colonies whereby this falsehood was enforced as ‘history’.

Even worse, derivative systems of ideological character and political usefulness, such as Islamism and Pan-Arabism, have also been fabricated in the Freemasonic ateliers the Orientalist libraries and research centers, only to be forcefully diffused among Muslims to fool and deceive them in their faith, Weltanschauung, and sociopolitical ideas. When a local opposition was expressed, like the rejection of Muhammad Ali (Napoleon’s disciple in Freemasonry, black magic, and Satanism) by the sheikhs of Al Azhar in Egypt, murderous acts were mercilessly perpetrated, terrible bloodshed took place, and docile and idiotic automatons replaced the erudite scholars who insisted on maintaining their faith, traditions, ethics, integrity and identity.

With respect to the so-called Islamic World, Pope Francis I must today take into consideration the following realities:

In today’s world, Islam as religion, practically speaking, does not exist anymore. This is not an overstatement, but mere confirmation of reality. If we consider spirituality as an integral and indispensable part of a religion, there is no trace of spirituality left among Muslims, either they are laymen or imams. Even the remnants of Islamic esoteric orders, the so much acclaimed in the West ‘Sufis’ of today, are de-spiritualized, dispirited, and loosened members of tarikat (turuq in Arabic, from tariqa, i.e. ‘path’ or school); they are mere imitators of acts and rituals of which the deeper meaning and the spiritual connection remain incomprehensible to them. Among laymen, the daily prayer is performed with literal accuracy, but in full ignorance of the reason, the meaning, and the symbolism of each of its acts. Rituals are therefore completely devoid of symbolism, symbols are absolutely dead, and the semiotics of the Quranic language are unrecognized or even denied.

Due to the total collapse of the Islamic sciences, arts, philosophy and esoteric life, what is practiced as religion by today’s Muslims would have been totally reprimanded and fully rejected by Islam’s most celebrated erudite polymaths and moral philosophers, had they come back to life only to observe the absolute misery of their descendants.

One must add here that, as per the historical rule, always the material surroundings, means, products, and artifacts of a society reflect perfectly well the level of the society’s overall culture, science, religion, faith, and spirituality. Material creativity and life are never disproportionate with the religious and spiritual development of a culture. The cleanness of the streets, the neatness of the buildings, and the conditions of material life prevailing in cities like Baghdad, Algiers, Cairo, Damascus, Jeddah, Sanaa, Karachi, etc. do not only give an accurate idea about the inhabitants’ material civilization, but also offer the perfection reflection of their souls and spiritual life.

Whereas the collapse of the Islamic sciences, arts, philosophy and esoteric life is an independent phenomenon, internal to Islam, the methodic exploitation of derivative situations by the colonial powers – tools of the evil Freemasonic lodges brought about many disasters to the Muslims, of which they are not conscious, and the worst of all calamities proved to be their total engulfment in sterile, inhuman concepts that take the appearance of rationalistic scholasticism whereas they function at the mental level as catalyst for a brainless fanaticism, which exposes the victims to the ensuing manipulations. Engaging in discussion with today’s Muslim theologians, one may get the wrong impression that Islam is a philosophical byproduct of the Aramaean Christian School of Antioch, which was known for its literal reading and the typological exegesis it projected onto the textual evidence. This would be wrong, because simply, with the exception of one, all the schools of Islamic philosophy, theology and jurisprudence have been progressively dismantled long before the colonial powers set foot in parts of the Islamic World; and evidently most of them were not influenced by the School of Antioch. Contrarily to most, the Ahmad ibn Hanbal School of jurisprudence and theology was extensively exposed to Antiochian impact, and it is its lowest and most unworthy offspring, the tenebrous theological School of Ibn Taimiyah, an heretic who was fully rejected by all the jurists and theologians of his times, that ultimately prevailed (posthumously – i.e. progressively through the 15th – 16th centuries) through proper utilization of fear, ignorance, and fanaticism of the mob. This situation was duly exploited by the Freemasonic colonial forces, and the ensuing result is today’s untenable conditions of life that prevail among Muslim societies.

Everything attested as act of Islamic cult and part of rituals performed by Muslims today consists in theatrical mimicking deprived of spiritual counterpart to the physical activity. Why this happens is easy to assess; there is no proper study of Islamic sciences, philosophy, literature, arts and architecture, symbolism and semiotics at all levels, from the primary schools to the so-called Islamic universities. Most of the Islamic polymaths, astronomers, philosophers, scientists, scholars, authors and historians are – to speak in proper terms – banned from the bogus educational institutions of the Muslim countries whereby the local, ignorant, imbecile, docile, Freemasonry-imposed/approved establishments have comfortably applied the typically Freemasonic, duplicitous language that praises something (in this case the Islamic past) that is at the same time scrupulously kept unknown! The addition of otherwise undetected (by the local ignorant ‘educators’) elements of Western, Freemasonic, and therefore purely Anti-Christian and Anti-Islamic, theoretical and ideological systems made the overall case extremely explosive – which corresponds perfectly well to needs of the Freemasonic – Zionist plan worked out across the Islamic world.

In fact, all acts of Islamic cult and parts of rituals performed by Muslims today do not emanate from Islam, properly speaking. They could not however emanate from Islam, because the religion preached by Prophet Muhammad is completely dead by now. All these acts have been filtered through the definitely anti-Islamic system of Modern Islamism, which was composed in the Freemasonic ateliers of the European Orientalists before it was projected onto local puppets in the colonial dependencies, and subsequently imposed with brutality and cruelty on all the Muslim peoples. For this reason, one reaches Islamic religious and cultural authenticity – or, to be more accurate, what is left of it – only in remote areas, such as several provinces of Algeria, Mali, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, etc. whereto the anti-Islamic, Islamist indoctrination of the colonial centers (Mecca, Medina, Jeddah, Riyadh, Cairo, Damascus, Karachi, etc.) has not yet been duly and properly exported.

This said, one can easily understand why the Freemasonic regimes of the Western world are more anxious than their colonial puppets to achieve the enrolment of a greater number of students originating from the Islamic periphery into the bogus-universities of the above mentioned cities. In this case, what is at stake is far from insignificant: it is all about the final deracination of the original Islamic traditions, the ultimate destruction of the last remnants of authentic Islamic religion and spirituality, and their replacement with the monstrous Freemasonic fabrication that was tyrannically imposed on all the colonial centers over the past two centuries, i.e. Islamism, the world’s most Anti-Islamic doctrine.

It is therefore absolutely necessary not to give credit to any misrepresentative public, private, and international authorities, the likes of ministries of Education, Culture, and Waqf, state universities, foundations such as Aga Khan Development Network, and notably, the Islamic Conference Organization, the Muslim World League, and their outfits that are all functioning as Freemasonic tools of the worst sort.

Through the above description, we can conclude that under the current circumstances the Catholic Church and the Islamic World not only face the same menace, but are both programmed to extinction through mutual clash, as per the details of a partly unveiled, monstrous plan elaborated by their common enemy.

Properly flushing child sexual abusers and homosexuals out of the Catholic hierarchy, firmly declaring the Christian faith imperiled within the context of today’s Freemasonry-controlled, materialistic and inhuman world, strongly rejecting today’s unjust and criminal global financial order, and aptly evangelizing a world with no money, no corruption, no colonial interference, a world with job for all, with equal opportunities, with plain justice for all, with national independence and integrity for every nation, Pope elect Francis I will certainly find among Muslims many who will share with him the same vision of a world free of Freemasonic machinations, Satanic deviations, Zionist cruelty, immoral attitudes, materialistic mindsets, and antihuman scheming of any type.

These Muslims will make the vision of St. Francis Xavier theirs, will contribute to a comeback in force of Christianity in the West, and will bring forth the long awaited Islamic Renaissance among Muslims. It will not take much to sweep away the Freemasonic gangsters and thieves who rule Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf pseudo-states, Morocco, Jordan, Pakistan, and Algeria. In fact, the Freemasonry-imposed/promoted regimes of Islamist fanaticism are so deeply Anti-Islamic of nature that an early Islamic Spring will bring forth cataclysmic results.

Only the revelation of the vicious crimes perpetrated by monstrous gangsters, the likes of Erdogan, Bouteflika, Abdullah of Jordan, Abdullah of Arabia, Zardari, Mohamed of Morocco, and others, against the vital interests of the Muslim nations and against Islam as religion will trigger such an explosion inside the Islamic world that all the political and religious establishments associated with these figures will collapse like paper tigers – in a far different manner than the so-called Arab Spring machinations. Muslims will fill the streets and fight to death in order to eliminate the Freemasonic puppet regimes and the colonial agents who disreputably impersonated the political leaders and heads of state across the Islamic world, thus tarnishing the fair name of Islam with their shameful deeds.

During their 14-century long history, the Christian and the Islamic worlds engaged many times in wars and confrontations; cultural cooperation and commercial exchange were also dense and prevailed many times. At the epicenter of both worlds, there were two faiths, two religious systems, that are closely associated to one another up to the point that the first Eastern Roman historical references to the appearance of Islam and its early expansion portrayed the new system not as a distinct religion but rather a Christological controversy and heresy; this clearly demonstrates the vicinity of both systems.

Today, both worlds are in confusion as both systems and the respective establishments were penetrated by anti-Godly connivers who promised ‘lumières’ (lights) only to bring the darkness of Darwinism, to legalize the crimes of abortion, child sexual abuse, and homosexuality, and perpetrate the spiritual death of the Man. The advanced disintegration of the social ethics in either world must be taken seriously, and concerted cooperation must be undertaken against the evil forces that targeted both religions, and through them, the spiritual part of the man, and the Creation itself.

Freemasonic Antipope Benedict XVI could not offer to the Islamic world anything but division and dispute; it is to be hoped that Francis I will opt for a totally different perspective, choosing among the Islamic world trustworthy interlocutors who can bring close to the Muslims’ hearts the spiritual journey that Pope elect Francis I promised to the Christians, by saying “And now, we take up this journey: Bishop and People. This journey of the Church of Rome, which presides in charity over all the Churches! A journey of fraternity, of love, of trust among us! Let us always pray for one another. Let us pray for the whole world, that there may be a great spirit of fraternity’’.

Pope Francis I is Petrus Romanus. Little matters whether he chose the very name used by St. Malachy in his prophecies or not. Petrus would be a first, since the times of the Apostle; Francis is also a first. Francis I can be what the name of St. Peter denotes, i.e. solid like a ‘stone’ or a ‘rock’ (Sëmʻān Kêfâ in Aramaic).

In fact, St. Francis Xavier was to St. Ignatius of Loyola what Peter had been to Jesus. Pope Francis I, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, is the first Jesuit ever to take the post over the past five centuries, ever since the Societas Jesu (S. J.), the most illustrious Christian Order, was instituted by St. Ignatius of Loyola and accepted by Vatican in 1540 (in the Bull Regimini militantis ecclesiae). As the Jesuits have always claimed to be soldiers of God, it was only normal that a particular effort was made by the Jesuits cardinals during the conclave to elect someone ready to fight in order to put an end to the present persecution of Christianity within the present materialistic, immoral, corrupt and Godless global world order. After all, the Catholic Church went evidently through a persecution over the past decades when through threats and duress Freemasonic Antipopes were forced upon the successive Vatican conclaves with the ensuing calamitous results that were earlier discussed.

This is exactly what St. Malachy prophecies state, when specifying that ‘’in the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock among many tribulations’’. And how else can we describe the Freemasonry-led, Vatican II-style, Modernist, materialistic, corrupt, deviate and Anti-Christian milieu that was imposed on the Catholic Church, if not by identifying it as ‘’the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church’’, and as a tribulation for the true believers of all the religions worldwide?

In fact, the spiritual journey promised by pope elect Francis I corresponds exactly to what St. Malachy prophecies describe as ‘feed’ of the Christian flock.

However, on the basis of an erroneous reading of St. Malachy prophecies, many have tried to identify Peter Romanus as the last pope, but despite the terms used in St. Malachy’s text, we have no reason to accept such a farfetched approach. Petrus Romanus is certainly the last pope of St. Malachy’s vision; that is all we know for sure. The eschatological excerpt that terminates the entire text (‘’after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people’’) does not say much; more importantly, it was at the epicenter of St. Malachy’s vision which was written down as prophecy. The epicenter was the succession of the Roman Catholic popes and the moral identity of each of them, something that was aptly and accurately described with few descriptive words for each pope (examples: pastor angelicus, de medietate lunae, de gloria olivae, etc.), as the pontiffs were not mentioned with their historical names.

First, even if we identify the seven-hilled city with Rome, which reflects quite a traditional approach, and if we expect a disaster to befall on Rome, this occurs ‘after’ – not during (notice this!) – the tenure of Petrus Romanus.

Second, end times prophecy, within the context of every religion, is not merely of revelatory nature; it also has a greatly educative dimension. Many seem to deliberately forget this in order to easily deceive and keep deceiving – a work carried out only to the ‘glory’ of Satan. There is no determinism in the prophecy. In fact, end times prophecy – in every religion – offers believers a permanent chance for deep moral concern, true repentance, and subsequent redemption. Many benefitted from this chance in different historical moments. There is no such a thing as ‘catastrophological determinism’ in the world created by God.

Since the Ancient Sumerian, Assyrian – Babylonian, and Egyptian times, any prophecy that would have deviated into such a misconception, would have been immediately discredited and irrevocably obliterated; it would therefore have not reached us! A world inextricably characterized by ‘catastrophological determinism’ is simply a world that God would have never created – or, to put it in a wider sense, a world that no god would have ever created!

We have been created as free beings able to avoid a pending disaster, and this truly happened many times in History, being thus attested in many Holy Scriptures. It would also be useful for us to understand why there are many people who believe in this erroneous concept nowadays; for the deeply rooted hatred that is located in their hearts, it must be a real ‘consolation’ and a true ‘solace’ for them to believe that their opponents, adversaries or enemies will soon be exterminated!

And this gives us the true dimensions of the Freemasonic – Zionist deception, and the extent up to which the Freemasons managed to penetrate among Christian populations and create fake-Christian (or, to put it better, ‘Anti-Christian’) groups, notably the Evangelicals, the Methodists, the Baptists, the Anabaptists, the Pentecostals, the Mormons and various other heretics that are automatically exposed to such mental and intellectual deviations. This is the result of those who disregard Patristic literature and imagine possible for anyone to be a Christian by only reading the New and the Old Testaments – under the guidance of a vicious, fake pastor who definitely rejects true, historical Christianity in order to preach his Freemasonic, Satanic heresy disguised as Christianity.

The same happens also among Muslims with the Freemasonry-promoted Wahhabi Islamists who have been continually funded over the past decades by an important portion of the Saudi budget.

But the Mankind will go ahead in peace, with the re-institutionalization of the Patristic Literature among all Christians, with the re-introduction of Islamic Sciences, History and Philosophy in the Muslim countries’ educational curricula, and with a closer, concerted cooperation between Catholics and Muslims that can be now initiated again by Pope Francis I, pretty much like the way it was instigated, many centuries ago, by St. Francis of Assisi, whose name is reflected in that of the first Jesuit Pope.