Tag Archives: France

Sudan, Ethiopia, Abyssinia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen and the Anti-African Plans of the Colonial Orientalists and of their local stooges

What follows is my response to a Somali friend who asked me about various aspects of the colonial distortion of African History with focus on the Horn Region, the historical background of the ethnic and culture divide between Semitic Abyssinia and Cushitic Ethiopia, and the ensuing benefits for the colonial powers France, England and America. The unprecedented affair of historical name usurpation by Abyssinia (‘Ethiopia’ is the historical name of Sudan – not of Abyssinia) brings into the picture Sudan, Africa’s greatest land and possible anti-colonial locomotive, which was continually, systematically and efficiently targeted by the colonial powers with the evil theories of Pan-Arabism and Islamism.

Answer to a Somali friend about Colonial Distortion of African History

Dear Mohamed,

Thank you for your questions and apologies for my late response!

I don’t know to what exactly you are referring by mentioning the “Amhara distortion of Ethiopia’s and Horn of Africa region’s History”. This sentence is not clear and perhaps you misunderstood parts of an article of mine.

The Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians did not “distort” any region’s or country’s History. They simply had their own version of world view, their own eschatology, their historical tradition, which was a forgery of course, and their expansionist plans. That’s one point.

A totally different point is the Western falsification of the World History, which started in parts of Western Europe as early as 1500, and after being tyrannically and deceitfully imposed there, it was ‘exported’ worldwide by means of colonization, modernization and globalization.

These two issues were two initially unrelated developments that one needs to first study per se (independently); only at a later stage the two developments converged. The point of conversion was surely the period from the middle of the 19th c. to the middle of the 20th c. when the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian rulers adjusted their visions and world views to the Western historical forgery and established a link with the Western plans for globalization, however managing to keep their tyranny far and almost cut off (if possible intact) from the rest of the world, because they did not agree with various elements of the Westernization process. By this, I mean that the world-known situation of underdevelopment that still characterizes Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) today was a very conscious decision of the Abyssinian rulers (be they monarchical, Third World communist or pseudo-republican) of the country over the past 70-140 years.

 

 

I. Abyssinia re-baptized as ‘Ethiopia’: a French colonial concept and decision

 

However, it was not an Abyssinian decision to re-baptize the country as “Ethiopia”; this was a Western plan that Haile Selassie only followed and implemented locally. Your question reminds me of the telephone call of an Australia-based Oromo friend of mine back in April 2007.

This long telephone call resulted in an article that I then published under the title “Ethiopia: a Panacea for Tyrants, a Stiletto in Colonial Hands” (27th April 2007) in AfroArticles, Buzzle and American Chronicle; that article was extensively republished at the time, but I think that by now it is not anymore available online. So, I promise you now that I will do my best to re-upload it within the next few days.

In that article, I expanded on this issue; it was my former professor of Egyptology in Paris (from 1978 until 1981), Jean Leclant (1920-2011 / read his curriculum in brief here: https://journals.openedition.org/lettre-cdf/2729?lang=en), who convinced his personal friend Haile Selassie to officially rename “Abyssinia” as “Ethiopia”.

When events of such importance take place, one has to automatically understand that they don’t reflect the innovative ideas of a young Egyptologist (who was also fluent in Ge’ez), but constituted deep colonial state machinations and evil conspiracies.

It may sound strange to you, but the real reason of re-baptizing Abyssinia with the historical name that describes Sudan (something that was well-known to Leclant) has more to do with Sudan itself, and less with Abyssinia.

Basically, it has to do with the general and vast falsehood that colonial diplomats, Orientalist academics, and statesmen diffuse and impose worldwide as “World History”; it is only a small piece in an entire mosaic.

When Leclant was assigned the task (following earlier diplomatic contacts between the French ambassador and Haile Selassie) to set up the Service of Antiquities in Abyssinia (: Fake Ethiopia), another French scholar, Jean Vercoutter (1911-2000, so 9 years older than Leclant) was tasked (following earlier agreements between the French and the English diplomats at Khartoum) to establish the Service of Antiquities in Sudan (when that country became independent).

 

 

II. Sudan, the only true Ethiopia: the ultimate target of the criminal colonial Orientalists in the middle 1950s

What the French colonials (who are the main standard bearers of the worldwide colonial historiography and of all the ensuing fallacies and distortions) wanted to achieve was this: they wanted to disconnect Sudan from

– its own past and 5000-year old heritage,

– its diverse and multifaceted historical tradition,

– its true national name,

– its African cultural identity, and – above all –

– the enormous perspectives that the historical reality de facto offers to Sudan at the academic, educational, intellectual, cultural, political, regional and international levels.

In other words, they wanted to prevent Africa’s largest country from rising to political, economic, academic, intellectual and geostrategic supremacy, which would be very easy, following a proper nation-building effort, which would involve a genuine, historical name for the country and a real, clear linguistic-cultural identity.

Sudan is the only country that has historical right to the name of Ethiopia. And Leclant knew this very well because his thesis concerned the historical period of the 8th and the 7th c. BCE, when first Upper (: Southern) Egypt and then Lower (: Northern) Egypt were under Cushitic / Ethiopian, i.e. Sudanese control. This development occurred because the Egyptian priesthood of Amun at Thebes (Luxor) wanted to use the Napata (today’s Karima)-based Kings of Cush (Kas in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics) in its clash with the Heliopolitan priesthood of Ra, which was based in the area of today’s Cairo and supported by Berber princes of the African North-Northwest (spanning across the area of today’s NW Egypt, Libya and the African Atlas).

The Egyptian Hieroglyphic term ‘Kas’ (also used among the Cushites of Ancient Sudan – Ethiopia for their own land, country and kingdom) was translated as Mat Kusi in Assyrian-Babylonian and as Cush in Ancient Hebrew; it was the equivalent of the Ancient Greek term ‘Ethiopia’, and we know this not only because there are Ancient Greek historical references to the state immediately south of Egypt as ‘Ethiopia’, but also because in the Septuagint Ancient Greek translation (3rd c. BCE) of the Hebrew Bible the terms ‘Cush’ and ‘Ethiopia’ are used in Ancient Greek interchangeably.

napata.jpg

napata 1.jpg

el kurru

nuri.jpg

Jebel Barkal (the holy mountain of Amun of Napata, venerated by the Ancient Cushites-Ethiopians of Sudan and by the Ancient Hamites of Kemet-Egypt) at the outskirts of Napata (today’s Karima) and the pyramids of the Cushitic Qore (: Kings) of the 8th-5th c. BCE (first two pictures); El Kurru pyramids near Karima (third picture); Nuri pyramids on the other bank of the Nile, opposite Karima and near Marawi (fourth picture) 

At this point, it is important to add that first, the territory of Ancient Cush with either Napata or Meroe as capital never encompassed lands of Abyssinia, and second, there was never a significant state located in the area of Abyssinia before Axum; and Axum rose to power only in the 4th c. CE.

Now, you may ask me what would be the result of a right nation building process carried out in Sudan in the late 1950s and the 1960s. This would be astonishing, but few people can now comprehend what great developments for the entire African continent the evil colonial fallacy of the French managed to avert.

 

meroe 1

meroe.jpg

meroe2

meroe map.jpg

meroe-map

Meroe and its pyramids represent a later phase of Ancient Sudanese, i.e. Ethiopian – Cushitic Civilization (4th c. BCE – 4th c. CE), which is totally unrelated to Abyssinia (today’s Fake Ethiopia)

 

 

III. What would happen if Sudan did not fall victim of Pan-Arabism, Nasserism and Islamism?

 

First, the Sudan would not be plunged in the Arab Nationalist (or Pan-Arabic) fallacy that absorbed all the resources of the victimized countries, which accepted this colonial Orientalist distortion and, after losing their true national identities, were plunged into disastrous wars, civil strives, severe oppression, genocides (like Darfur), and choleric processes of linguistic Arabization and pseudo-religious Islamization.

There is not even one drop of Arab blood in any Sudanese citizen’s veins. The country accepted Islam at a later age and without any sort of invasion. This is also true for Upper Egypt; Sohag, Qena, Luxor and Aswan do not have an Islamic past that exceeds 1100 years. Iberia and North India, Central Asia and Sicily were under Islamic rule, Constantinople was attacked by Islamic armies, but Luxor and Aswan were calm and pious Christian cities of the Kingdom of Nobatia that had capital at Faras, near Abu Simbel.

The fallacious Arab identity of a genuinely non-Arab country like Sudan alienated the quasi-totality of the African nations gathered within the colonial structure under a fake name and a monstrous identity. All these ancient and noble African nations did not need to either learn the fabricated, fake modern pseudo-language that is called ‘Modern Arabic’ or to become Muslim.

There were already enough Muslims in the Sudan, from the Furis (of Darfur) to the Nubians to the Beja to the Berta; modern Sudan’s most illustrious anti-colonial exploits and heroic battles were undertaken by Muslims. First Sudan and the noble leader of Muhammad Ahmad the Mahdi stood against the Anglo-French colonial cholera and died fighting to avert Africa’s colonization. Quranic Arabic was their religious language and it was wonderful like that. These Muslims did not have major clashes with the non-Muslims of various adjacent regions. Only within the abnormal and inhuman frame of the vicious, Satanic colonial rule, all African nations were oppressed and all Africans started fighting against one another.

zzz.jpg

z

zz.jpg

axum map

Axum, the capital of Ancient Abyssinia during pre-Christian and Christian (4th – 7th c. CE); Abyssinians spoke and wrote Ge’ez, which remains until today the religious language of the Modern Abyssinians, i.e. the Amhara and Tigray. Abyssinians are Yemenites who crossed the Red Sea and settled in Africa as late as the 2nd half of the 1st millennium BCE. The famous stelae of Axum testify to Axum’s pre-Christian civilization and date back to the first centuries of the Christian Era.

 

 

IV. What a true nation-building would mean for Sudan, rightfully named ‘Ethiopia’

 

With Ethiopia as national name, Sudan would give all its citizens the true portion of historical heritage and antiquity that belongs to them and they would all find elements of their culture, spirituality, faith and world view in the Ancient Cushitic and Meroitic past. Learning that Napata (today’s Karima) was already a holy place for the Ancient Egyptians, all Modern Sudanese would grasp an idea of the greatness of their land and of the splendor of the past that belongs to them – and not to the colonial gangsters who appear under the evil masks of Orientalists, archaeologists, epigraphists, Africanists, linguists, ethnographers, philologists and historians, only to

– minimize the African past,

– conceal its cataclysmic impact on the formation of civilization on European soil, and

– subordinate it to the racist fallacy of Hellenism, Greco-Roman civilization, and Euro-barbarianism.

With Ethiopia as national name, all Modern Sudanese would become proud of their civilization and of its radiation. In striking contrast with the colonially corrupt, idiotic and worthless Modern Egyptians, who have been stupidly selling their own antiquities for 222 years, Modern Sudanese would undertake the research of their past, the exploration of their antiquities, the decipherment of their ancient writing systems, and the reassessment of their diachronic role in World History at a national, sovereign level, finding the true, non-colonial partners for these purposes.

Second, because of the absence of the above, a true nation-building effort would take place and, as a consequence, today’s Sudanese would be all fully conscious of

a- their Cushitic – Ethiopian historical and cultural heritage

b- their Ancient History, as it is recorded in Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and in Meroitic hieroglyphic and cursive writing systems

c- their ethnic, national, cultural, historical and spiritual interconnection with the Oromos and the other subjugated Cushitic nations of Abyssinia

d- their Christian Nobatian, Makurian and Alodian History, as it is recorded in Coptic, Old Nubian and Makurian writing systems

e- their Islamic African History that is totally unrelated to Arab presence

f- their pro-eminent role across the trade routes of the Antiquity and the Islamic Ages, when the Historical Ethiopia (i.e. Sudan) linked

– Egypt with Sahara and the Western African world,

– the Mediterranean world with the Horn of Africa region, and

– almost all the African Muslims with the three cities of Islamic Pilgrimage, namely Mecca, Madina and Al Quds ash Sherif (Jerusalem).

ancient sudan map.png

1ST C INDIA

 

 

 

V. Regional and international consequences of a true nation-building in Sudan, rightfully named ‘Ethiopia’

 

Third, because of the above, Sudan would

a- help dissolve the criminal colonial state of Abyssinia, by incorporating Oromia into Sudan-Ethiopia and by making Afaan Oromo the official language of the new,  magnificent African super-state

b- help form numerous independent nations on parts of Sudan’s soil, namely among the Bejas in the East, in Darfur, in Kordofan, and in the South – when the Westerners were not there to fuel rebellion against Pan-Arabist Khartoum that they (: the Western colonials) fabricated in the first place

c- help establish numerous independent nations on parts of the criminal colonial state of Abyssinia, namely Afar, Ogaden, Sidama, Hadiya, Kaffa, Kambata, Shekacho, Wolayita, Agaw, Nuer, Anuak, Berta, etc. whereby every nation would have their own language as official

d- help dissolve the filthy colonial fabrication of Djibouti, a pseudo-state created by the criminal, murderous gangsters of France, and in the process help Afar nation pull together all parts of their nation and Isa tribe merge with the other Somalis

e- strike an alliance with the Eastern Cushitic nation of Somalia in order to impose a genuine, anti-colonial, African Order across Africa, which would bring forth the dissolution of fake colonial states whereby many different historical nations are oppressed by the filthy nation or tribe that had previously been the lackeys of their colonial masters, like the Kikuyu in Kenya

f- launch an African educational, academic system in total refutation of the Western Orientalism, Hellenism, ‘Greco-Roman Civilization’ and fake Africanism, and in total rejection of the racist, Eurocentric version of World History,

– by highlighting the superiority of Ancient African civilizations (Egyptian, Cushitic-Meroitic, Carthaginian-Berber) over Ancient Greece and Rome,

– by establishing the correct links between the Ancient African civilizations and the Ancient Oriental civilizations (Sumerian, Assyrian-Babylonian, Hurrian, Hittite-Anatolian, Canaanite-Phoenician, and Iranian),

– by meticulously examining and widely publicizing the multifaceted, overwhelming African cultural, religious, spiritual, artistic, literary and linguistic impact on Ancient and Medieval Europe

1.jpg

Iseum Campense

Iseum Campense Rome.jpg

Black Egyptian high priests were initiating White Romans into the mysteries of the Ancient Egyptian divine concept of Isis (Aset in Egyptian Hieroglyphics); hundreds of temples of Isis (Iseum – Isea in Latin) have been excavated across Europe but this evidence of absolute African Egyptian impact on European civilization remains hidden to Europeans and others – in order not to function as a rejection of the still prevalent, racist pseudo-historical model of ‘Hellenism’ and Greco-Roman civilization’. Iseum Campense, Rome

 

g- promote a system of cultural, academic, educational and intellectual interconnection among all African nations, imposing

– the immediate obliteration of the colonial languages, English and French, across the continent,

– the prohibition of these two languages from the primary, secondary and tertiary education of all African states, and

– their replacement by a system of all-African multilingualism, involving the major African languages,

h- destroy all fake pseudo-states that the colonial powers, France, England and America, produced over the past 222 years on African soil, notably Fake Egypt, Fake Morocco, etc. and help generate genuinely African nations instead.

What I am saying with the aforementioned brief diagram is that a non-Arab, non-colonial, genuinely African Sudan, named Ethiopia, in the middle 1950s should act as if having fully understood, assessed and capitalized on the historical conclusions of scholars like Martin Bernal (author of the venerated “Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization”, in three volumes: 1987, 1991, 2006) and Edward Said (author of the highly respected “Orientalism”, 1978). This aphorism of mine may sound as preposterous because these great opuses were published more than 20 or 30 years after Sudan proclaimed its independence.

However, all the constituent elements, the textual and archaeological evidence, which led the aforementioned scholars to their groundbreaking publications, were there already in 1956. As a matter of fact, all that an African scholar needed to do was

– study the historical sources and the archaeological material record

– identify the discrepancies between historical sources and colonial bibliography

– list a vast number of topics commonly shared among colonial scholars but hidden from the Western and worldwide public (readership)

– analyze the reasons of the unrepresentative selection of historical sources for educational – intellectual – cultural purposes, as carried out by colonial scholars

– examine the above through the question ‘qui bono’ and accurately specify the colonial intentions, and

– conclude about a) the racist, criminal, and inhuman motives of the colonial pseudo-academia and b) the ensuing benefit for the colonial powers and their false historical version.

 

 

VI. Anti-colonial struggle means total rejection of the colonial fallacy still diffused worldwide as ‘Word History’

 

A non-colonial, non-Arab Sudan, officially named Ethiopia, would of course demolish fundamental colonial myths and highlight concealed facts that constitute basic elements of today’s Western version of World History. The topic is as vast as an entire encyclopedia, but I will herewith offer few examples pertaining to Africa and the surrounding seas.

a- there is no such country as “Egypt” and there is no such thing as “Egyptian Civilization”. The country’s real historical name is Kemet, which means the ‘Black Land’ or ‘the Land of Black People’, and this is due to the fact that the Ancient Egyptians were both, dark brown and black. So, there was Kemetic or Kemetian Civilization. Today, a liberated, non-colonial country at the northeastern corner of the Black Continent must be called Kemet – not Egypt – at the international level. Egyptian politicians and statesmen accepting to name their country ‘Egypt’ at the international level are born slaves and constitute a most disreputable clique alien to the great history of that land.

Kmt_obelisk

kemet.jpg

kemet 2

Kemet written in hieroglyphic characters

 

b- the name ‘Egypt’, used by Egyptians, constitutes a colonial relic of the filthiest and most racist contents. The word originates from the Ancient Greek word Aigyptos, which is the Hellenization of the Ancient Egyptian term ‘Hwt Ka Ptah’, i.e. ‘the enclosure of the soul of Ptah’; Ptah was a marginal deity in Ancient Egypt, and the Ancient Egyptians would never accept to name their country after that deity of the polytheistic priesthood of Memphis. This is the first point against the use of the term. The second point is related to the fact that European and North American colonials view the use of this term as resulting from their cultural, political, academic and intellectual supremacy over colonized (since 1798) Modern ‘Egypt’.

c- Modern Egypt cannot be called “Egypt” at the international level for one extra, totally different, reason; the use of this name, which is totally alien and unknown to today’s average Egyptians, consists in an unprecedented colonial denigration and vulgar deprecation of the modern nation, which uses the name Masr to denote their identity. Assyrian-Babylonian of origin (Musur and Mat Masri, lit. ‘land of Egypt’), this name was diffused among Aramaeans and Hebrews, before being adopted among Arabs.

And notice the difference, if you please: the authorities of Myanmar managed to impose at the international level respect for their country’s name, which is the aforementioned, officially accepted, name and not the filthy, colonial parody of Burma that the English colonials used since the early colonial days. But the idiotic, colonial, Pan-Arabist rulers of Kemet / Masr from Nasser to Mubarak to Morsi never raised such a subject in an effort to always remain disgustingly servile and docile enough to please their colonial masters – the Satanic gangsters of France, England and America.

d- there is no such expanse of sea as “the Indian Ocean”; this is a fake term introduced by the English, Dutch, Portuguese and French colonials as late as the 16th c. In the Antiquity, the most commonly used term was “Red Sea” (in Ancient Greek: ‘Erythra Thalassa’); during the Roman and Arsacid / Sassanid times, this term denoted the seas that we call today ‘Persian Gulf’, ‘Red Sea’ and ‘Indian Ocean’. When Agatharchides writes in the 2nd c. BCE his treatise on the Red Sea (Geographi Graeci Minores), in the part of his work in which he describes the natural phenomenon due to which the sea was called ‘red’, he narrates an event happening in today’s coast of Hadhramaut or Mahra in SE Yemen.

e- if one wants to name the entire Afro-Asiatic expanse of sea after the national name of the first seafarers and navigators who, after studying the meteorological conditions, the winds and the oceanographic data of that sea, sailed across the ocean from the Horn of Africa region to today’s coast of Malabar, then one has to call the sea “Yemenite Ocean”. First, the Qataban Yemenites, with capital at Timna, established safe navigation from the Gulf of Aden to the Malabar coast where they established commercial relations with the local Dravidian (not Indian, not Indo-European) kingdoms as early as the middle of the first millennium BCE.

Qataban Yemenite thalassocracy across the Yemenite Ocean lasted many centuries and was matched with an early colonization of the East African coast where the Qatabanis intermingled with the local Ancient Somalis of the coast of Azania (from the Horn of Africa down to today’s Daressalaam in Tanzania). Qatabani supremacy was terminated when the Himyarite Yemenites and the Sabaean Yemenites made an alliance to vanquish Qataban and accumulate in their palaces the mythical treasures that used to be garnered at Timna. This happened ca. 115 BCE.

yemen.png

yemen marib

Yemen1.jpg

yemen marib 2

yemen himyar.jpg

Maps of Ancient Yemenite kingdoms and the monuments of Marib, capital of the Sabaean (Sheba) Kingdom. There is no link between the Biblical – Quranic Queen of Sheba, an exclusively Yemenite Queen, and the Makeda forgery of Kebra Negast. The Queen of Sheba was totally unrelated to Africa.

 

The Himyar – Sheba alliance was not as experienced as the Qatabanis seafarers; their heavy taxes were a problem for the last Ptolemies who were easy partners. After Octavian invaded Kemet (Egypt) and annexed the land of the Nile to the Roman Empire (30 BCE), the Romans proved to be difficult partners and in the year 25 BCE, Aelius Gallus, prefect of Egypt, undertook a maritime expedition against Yemen, which also involved several land expeditions. At the end, after many collateral damages, the Romans managed to destroy the main Yemenite port of call at Aden and thus force the Yemenites to cooperate with Rome and reduce the customs.

Yemenite thalassocracy across the Yemenite Ocean continued, evidently coordinated with the Roman imperial establishments at Egypt and Leuke Kome (NW coast of today’s Saudi Arabia), and it is well documented in historical texts like the Periplus of the Red (Erythraean) Sea, which was written by an Alexandrian Egyptian captain and merchant who traveled across the coastal regions from Suez to China at the times of the Roman Emperor Nero (so in the middle of the 1st c. CE). The same text describes the continuation of the Himyar-Sabaean colonization of Azania and prevalence across the seas. There have truly been found Roman coins in different archaeological sites across the Malabar coast where the kingdoms of Damirica, Nelkyndis, Cerobothra (Chera) and Pandya were located according to the Periplus of the Red (Erythraean) Sea.

But Yemenite traders and sailors used these coins while sailing across the Yemenite Ocean; and these kingdoms were all Dravidian – not Indian. And the Dravidians never demonstrated navigational skills, which is one more reason for which we cannot call this sea ‘Indian Ocean’, pretty much like we cannot call ‘India’ the cemetery of South Asiatic nations that the English colonials prepared for more than 100 years during their calamitous colonial presence there. ‘India’ is only the land around the Indus River, and this concerns only a minor part of the state which is nowadays fallaciously called with this name.

PERIPLUS ma

 

At the beginning of my response, I mentioned the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian world view, eschatology, and historical tradition. This relates to their famous historical book Kebra Negast, which was written in Ge’ez, their religious language down to our days. First written in Coptic, then translated to Arabic (early 13th c.), and last rendered in Ge’ez at the beginning of the 14th c., Kebra Negast is a historical forgery prepared by Amhara debteras (monks) only to justify their false pretensions to ancestry and to royalty and to prepare the ground for expansionism of apocalyptic and eschatological contents.

The disappearance of Islam, the common borders between Abyssinia and a Zionist state in the area of Palestine, the fallacious and unhistorical theory of Axum being the ‘New Zion’, and the fabrication of Menelik, nonexistent son of Solomon (Suleyman) and ‘Makeda’, the fake queen of Sheba (that kingdom was located only in Yemen, not in Africa), do not bode well with the future of Africa but are all some of the targets of the real authors of this forgery. All later Amhara and Tigray ‘prophecies’ about their expansion are repetitions of earlier material included in Kebra Negast. Somali, Sudanese and Egyptian (not to mention more) scholars are idiotic enough not to learn Ge’ez, not to study Kebra Negast and not to highlight the fallacious nature of the book that prepares the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians as followers or conscious slaves of the Antichrist (Masih al-Dajjal). But this is a totally different subject, as I already said.

Best regards,

Shamsaddin

————————————————–

Download the text in Word doc:

Sudan, Ethiopia, Abyssinia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen and the Anti-African Plans of the Colonial Orientalists

The Colonial Powers’ Most Ominous and Secret Evildoing: Cultural, Academic, and Educational Disconnection among all the Nations of the World

What follows is the publication of an exchange of email with a South Africa-based friend from Malawi whose interests cover all aspects of colonialism and colonially-imposed divisions, cultural alienation, and historical identity loss that the criminal colonial powers of France, England and America generated in Africa and worldwide.

———————- MY FRIEND’S FIRST EMAIL ————————

Hi Shamsaddin,

I can’t resist asking you these two questions:

It is true that Islam has its roots in Africa? Where is the Evidence (If Yes).

Who were the Ephraphites? I have noticed that the word is in the Jerusalem Bible but not in any other Bible. I know you are very conversant with the History of North Africa and the Middle East.

Kind regards,

Kondwani

———————- MY FIRST RESPONSE ————————————

Hi my dear friend.

Thank you for your questions!

 

 

I. The distortion of Ancient Oriental History as carried out by ignorant religious leaders

 

I start with your second point; you heard probably a mistaken pronunciation or you read the name misspelled.

It is Ephrath, so the people who live there are Ephrathites. Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephrath

Every attempt to locate Ephrath outside Canaan is a distortion.

Bear in mind that «Ephrathite» is NOT a national name. It is an adjective formed out of a toponym: like ‘Berliner’ or ‘Parisian’ or ‘Muscovite’.

It is a most unimportant location in terms of Oriental History.

Anyone (as author) who focuses much on scarcely documented toponyms, instead of the main centers of the ancient world, like Nineveh, Assyria, Babylon, Thebes of Egypt, Heliopolis (Iwnw) and Memphis, Hattusas, Ugarit, Mari, Ebla, Kalhu, Persepolis, Byblus and Carthage, is most probably a forger.

In the cases of Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, you have hundreds of thousands of ancient texts that document all the details of those ancient civilizations.

The Ancient Hebrews and the Jews left few texts; the Bible is mostly unreliable and insignificant, and those who speak of it today, only misinterpret it for evil political reasons.

In any case, compared to the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Hittites, the Egyptians and the Iranians, the Ancient Hebrews were a marginal, impotent and worthless state.

Focusing on them, instead of studying the other, sizeable and leading empires of the Ancient Orient and Africa is as if someone today ignores everything about Germany, China, the US, Russia, India, etc. and focuses too much on Singapore! That’s ridiculous!

 

 

II. Two points about Islam’s presence in Africa

 

No, Islam does not have its roots in Africa but in Arabia – Asia.

But it depends on what you mean by saying «Islam».

As per the Islamic viewpoint (which is mostly forgotten by most of today’s Muslims), Islam was not first preached by Prophet Muhammad but by Adam, Enoch, Noah and all the early prophets.

Islam means submission to or contact with God.

The epitome of Islam is the belief in One God (monotheism).

Now, if you mean that there were pre-Islamic monotheistic faiths and religions in Africa, then yes!

There was «Islam» in Africa long before Prophet Muhammad.

Pharaoh Akhenaten abolished Theban polytheism and instituted Atenism, a monotheistic religion in the middle of the 14th c. BCE. Monotheistic hymns to Aten are found copied and pasted in the Hebrew Bible. Without Akhenaten, there would never be Moses.

More:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aten

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nefertiti

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tutankhamun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarna

Best,

Shamsaddin

———————— MY FRIEND’S SECOND EMAIL ——————-

Good Morning Shamsaddin,

Thank you for your response. You have now given me good reason to rather dig further into History when it comes to what has been fed to us by the colonialists. Now I understand what is meant by the Bible being copied from much older books, for example I have come across an Ancient Egyptian text that the Psalms were copied from. The analogy you have used of Singapore has given me a better perspective of what ancient and available records bear witness to. I really appreciate it.

And about Islam you have given me the best answer, especially when you illustrate that it was rather preached by Adam initially. It makes a lot of sense now because somebody told me that it means `submitting to God’ but I needed further elaboration.

It is such knowledge that I have no doubt will fill the generation gap or find the missing link if we search hard enough and eventually empower us towards a brighter future. I love the thought of the unknown possibilities.

Enjoy the rest of your day further,

Regards,

K.

———————— MY SECOND RESPONSE ——————–

My dear friend,

Hope you and your family are doing well, being of the best health!

Your response contains many points worthy highlighting.

 

 

III. Viewpoints, nationalist Greco-centric psychopaths, and my personal standpoint as attested across my publications

 

You certainly understand that everything hinges on viewpoints, i.e. on through how many angles you saw a topic. This is a vast issue that applies to everything.

What I said to you about the small Ancient Hebrew state, comparing it to immense, sophisticated and very advanced empires of Assyria, Babylonia, Egypt and Iran, I also said in Greece back in the middle 1980s about the tiny Ancient Greek states (the likes of Sparta, Thebes, Corinth and Athens) that constituted the barbaric periphery of the then known world. I triggered an overwhelming rage among the idiotic, nationalistic, chauvinistic people who are omnipresent across the entire political spectrum of that unfortunate and ill-fated state. They accused me of high treason!

Haha! Stupid!

One of those guys – I still remember – asked me exactly this: “if your opinions are these, you Dr. Megalommatis, how have you been degraded so much as to become a ….. White”?

Of course, I did not answer, but I really enjoy it when my opponents make so devilish comments.

I regret for having not kept record of his name so that I ask him back in 2015 when Greece collapsed financially: “if your opinions are these, you Mr. Greek, how have you been degraded so much as to become a ….. bankrupt and a beggar”?

I found it amusing, rewarding and sublime!

When evil people hate you and insult you, God sends you a message that you are on the correct path.

I remained the same during my entire 35-year long career, which started only after 11 years of graduate, postgraduate and doctoral studies in more than 10 universities of 7 different countries were completed.

I always tell the truth however unpleasant or hurting it may be; as I say, between my country and the truth, I always side with the truth.

 

IV. Religion, Theology, Politics, and my personal standpoint as attested across my publications

 

The same happens when it comes with my religious beliefs; I was born Christian Orthodox, I rejected (but did not hate) Christianity, I was a Greek citizen without religion for some years, and then I adhered to Islam. This was a spiritual path and every person has his own path.

If Islam was good for me, Buddhism may be better for another European, and the Waaqeffanna traditional Oromo religion is perhaps the path of a third person from Europe.

But the spiritual choice must never affect the standard orientation of the heart and of the mind toward Truth.

So, I reject many wrong points that today’s Muslims believe as “religion” whereas these points are a pure matter of historical developments first distorted and then popularized.

Today’s Muslims, Christians, Hindus and many others fail to see the limits between Spirituality, Moral, Religion, Theology, and Politics.

Politics is impermissible in Religion, sinister in Moral, and diabolical in Spirituality.

Theology may eventually match with politics, but Theology consists in the most disastrous distortion of Religion, in the most calamitous breach of Moral, and in total abandonment of Spirituality.

However, I must admit that today many people deliberately confuse Religion with Theology; but this is perfectly revelatory of the evilness of politics which must not exist among the faithful anytime anywhere.

There was not any politics among your ancestors before 300 years (thank God!), there was not any politics among the ancestors of Oromos before 400 years, there was not any politics among the Ancient Egyptians of the times of Nechao (whose fleet achieved the circumnavigation of Africa), there was not any politics among the Ancient Somalis of Punt (Horn of Africa) when Pharaoh Hatshepsut (the World History’s first queen) sent her fleet there before ca. 3500 years, there was not any politics among Christian Eastern Romans of the times of Justinian I, there was not any politics among the Iranians of the times of Shapur II, there was not any politics at the times of Harun al Rashid, the Abbasid Caliphate’s greatest emperor before 1200 years, and more importantly, there was not any politics around Muhammad, there was not any politics around Jesus, there was not any politics around Zoroaster, Buddha and Confucius, there was not any politics around Moses, and so on.

Politics is the evil tool of post-Renaissance world gangsters in their attempt to first corrupt and then eliminate the Mankind.

I say all this because many people believe that my texts are affected by the fact that I am a Muslim. That’s very wrong and absolutely untrue. Oromos are divided among Islam, Waaqeffanna and Christianity, but I explicitly support Waaqeffanna as the most genuine religious choice for all Oromos. On the other hand, through many articles, I demanded as early as 2004 and 2005 the formation of a Christian Aramaean state in parts of today’s Iraq and Syria to save Oriental Christianity; this did not happen and I am sure that you know what evildoing happened instead….

Recently, I republished a series of articles that I published in 2007-2010 in favor of Kosovo, its secession from Serbia, its national independence, and its international recognition. I did not support Kosovo and the Kosovars’ plead for National Sovereignty because of the coincidence that they are Muslims and I am a Muslim too! I supported them because this was historically right and morally correct. If you don’t use moral criteria while evaluating historical developments or when siding with today’s conflicts, you end up a wild animal in today’s jungle.

A Greek friend of mine from Georgia (in the Caucasus region) wrote to me to react against my articles and say that Kosovo became a narco-trade center and a hub of Islamists. Nonetheless! Because they made a very bad use of their freedom, this does not mean that they should not become independent. My friend’s observations were correct, but his remarks wrong. By the way, do you know one modern state that is not ruled by narco-gangsters? There may be few exceptions, but you know, always an exception reconfirms the rule!

———————————-

1 Philae

Isis Temple at Philae Island, Egypt – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Iraq.

2 Nuri

Nuri Pyramids – Karima, Sudan – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Morocco.

3 Djenne Djenno

Djenne Mosque, Mali – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Somalia.

 

4 Ras Hafun 17 c mosque

Ras Hafun 17th c. Mosque, Somalia – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Sudan.

4 volubilis

Volubilis, Morocco – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Nigeria.

5 Queen Arwa mosque Jibla

Queen Arwa as-Sulayhi Mosque – Jibla, Yemen – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Egypt.

6 Dura Europos Sacrifice of Conon

The Sacrifice of Conon – Wall Painting of a Temple in Dura Europos, Syria – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Greece.  

7 Ancient wall of Zaria

7 Queen Amina of Zaria 1536-1566

The Ancient Wall of Zaria and the Muslim Queen Amina of Zaria (1536-1566) who led her armies at the battlefield – It is impossible to study about these topics in a university in Yemen.

8 Ajuraan Sultanate Ming China

Somali Ajuraan Sultanate and their relations with Ming China – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Turkey.  

Syrian Orthodox Monastery Mar Mattai, (St. Matthews Monastery) overlooking Mosul, Iraq, Middle East

Aramaean Mar Mattai Monastery – North of Mosul, Iraq – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Mexico.  

10 Nineveh walls

Nineveh Walls – Mosul, Iraq – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Algeria.

Iraq Madain - Apr 2005

Tesifun (Ctesiphon) – Al Mada’in, Iraq – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Azerbaijan.  

12 Takht e Soleyman

Takht-e Suleyman, Iran – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Lebanon.

13 Takshasila

Takshasila (Taxila), Pakistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Kazakhstan.  

14 Balkh

Balkh (Bactra), Afghanistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Palestine.

15 nemrut dagh

Colossal Head of Antiochus I at the Hierothesion of Antiochus I

Nemrut dağı – Adıyaman, Turkey – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Iran.

16 Shah Jahan abad

Shah Jahan-abad (Old Delhi), India – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Tanzania.

17 Registan S

Registan – Samarqand, Uzbekistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Indonesia.

18 Sigiriya SL

Sigiriya rock, citadel and palace, Sri Lanka – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Malaysia.  

19 Borobudur

Borobudur – Central Java, Indonesia – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Pakistan.

20 Xian Great Mosque

Great Mosque at Xi’an, Ancient Capital of China – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Turkmenistan…….   

…….. but it is always possible to study about all the above mentioned topics in universities in Denmark, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland, Czechia and Finland.

 

——————————————-

 

 

V. The first Victims of the Colonial Falsehood are the Western Europeans and the North Americans.

 

You say something critical: “what has been fed to us by the colonialists”. This is true, but this is only partly true. And if you don’t see the rest, you will never realize the extent of the problem.

The colonial falsehood diffused in Asia, Africa and Latin America to ensure obscurantism, failure, ignorance, deception and impotency really pales if compared to the earlier lies, historical distortions, and theoretical forgeries that the Western Europeans diffused among their own populations. Entire nations like the Italians, the Spaniards, the Germans, the Poles, the Greeks, the Russians, the Danes, the French, the English, the Dutch and many others had been fed with enormous quantities of deception and fallacy instituted as Enlightenment, Romanticism, Classicism and Renaissance (I advance backwards in time).

It is essential that you understand that the European populations were the first victims of 15th – 16th c. European intellectual, religious, spiritual, academic and scientific elite. Only because generations after generations of Western European populations believed the falsehood and the deception diffused among them, they were able to perform as colonial administrators, military, diplomats, academics, instructors and businessmen in Latin America, Africa, India, SE Asia, Middle East, and China.

First, they “believed” that their Christian past (330-1453) was a barbaric period called “Dark Ages”. That was wrong – it consisted in a vicious lie. They were civilized then, and they became barbarian with the Renaissance corruptive falsehood and intellectual contamination.

Then, they postulated that Greek and Roman Antiquity (500 BCE-330 CE) was a highly civilized period. That was wrong – it consisted in a vicious lie. The Western elites wanted only to portray the diabolical Ancient Greek orgies and Roman symposia as “civilization” and the religious (Christian, Islamic, Jewish and other) moral discipline and abstinence as “barbarism”.

Later, they idealized the Greek and Roman Antiquity, forcing European populations to reject their Christian identity and to stupidly imitate the Satanic rites performed in Ancient Greek and Roman temples dedicated to demons like Zeus, Hera, Apollo, Aphrodite, Vesta, Athena, Mercury, Saturn, etc. Read the Satanic works by Racine, notably Phaedra, to realize what I mean! Only a paranoid Satanist like Moliere could compose a nauseating and disgusting filth like Tartuffe as a villainous attack against the divine life style and the morals of the average Christians of his times.

Subsequently, being “sure” of their supremacy, the Satanic rulers of Western Europe noticed that Oriental Christians, Muslims, Africans, Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians and others differed from them; the difference of the others was tantamount to “inferiority” as per the already sick and corrupt minds of the 18th c. Europeans.

As they found superb references to the Ancient Oriental civilizations (Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Iran, Sudan and India) in the Ancient Greek and Latin texts, the first Western European Orientalist and Africanist explorers started their notorious itineraries. They had big amount of monies with them in order to purchase ancient documents, manuscripts, and various antiquities. But they did not love the lands they explored; they hated them terribly because they could not “find” there what they had read in the Ancient Greek and Latin texts.

 

 

VI. The Evil Colonial Deeds have nothing to do with Economic Exploitation, Military Presence or Political Interference: the Problem is elsewhere

 

This is the way the world’s most monumental lie started: Orientalism (including European Africanism).

Point 1 – Concealment of Ancient Greek and Roman acceptance of the Oriental and African Originality and Superiority in terms of Spirituality, Culture and Civilization

Western Europeans tried first to conceal the fact that the Ancient Greek and Latin texts are plenty of references testifying to the facts that the Ancient Greeks and the Romans viewed the Oriental civilizations as qualitatively superior to themselves and went there to study, to learn and to venerate. Ancient Greeks and Romans were honored to have Black hierophants, high priests, mystics and astronomers, cosmologists and spiritual masters as their teachers. The most important Ancient Greek author, Plutarch (1st – 2nd c. CE), the high priest of Ancient Greece’s most venerable temple, the Oracle at Delphi, wrote about the Ancient Egyptian Cosmogony, Spirituality and Eschatology in his De Iside et Osiride (: ‘About Isis and Osiris’ – part of his Moralia), also testifying to the diffusion of Ancient Egyptian religions, spiritual and esoteric rites, cults and faith among the Ancient Greeks.

The tendency went down to the Christian and Islamic times; St. Augustine, a major Father of the Christian Faith, was a Berber – a Black. His Roman and European disciples were White but had no problem. This was so because Christianity was a normal religion but it ceased to exist with the rise of the Satanic, Jesuit Renaissance.

Point 2 – Abysmal minimization of Ancient Oriental achievements, exploits, sciences and culture in parallel with a magnification of Ancient Greek and Roman deeds

Second, the Western European Orientalists and Africanists did their ingenious best to incessantly minimize the radiation and the achievements, the exploits and the masterpieces of all Oriental civilizations, while magnifying the achievements of the Ancient Greeks and the Romans.

Examples: on one hand, they magnify the exploits of Alexander the Great, who in reality invaded only one, vast but decayed, state: the Achaemenid Empire of Iran. The advance of Alexander beyond the eastern borders of Iran was minimal. On the other hand, they minimize the Egyptian invasions of Senusret (Sesostris) III (1878-1839 BCE), who crossed through Caucasus to the eastern coasts of the Black Sea and beyond, colonizing Colchis and Scythia. Why? Because this fact bears witness to Black people presence in Europe, as well as to the diffusion of Black civilization across the barbarian realms of 2nd millennium BCE Europe.

They minimize the Egyptian presence off the East African coastlands (Punt) and the Horn region as early as 2000-1500 BCE.  They minimize the extent of the Iranian invasion of Egypt, Libya and Sudan (: ‘Ethiopia’ in Ancient Greek texts) under the Achaemenid Iranian Emperor Kabujiya (Cambyses) II (530-532 BCE). Invading Napata (Karima in North Sudan: 750 km south of today’s Sudanese – Egyptian border alongside the Nile, so 2200 km from the present Egyptian – Palestinian border at Gaza), Cambyses was farther from his capital than Alexander was from his, 200 years later, when the Macedonian king invaded parts of the Indian North beyond Punjab (Pentapotamia).

The aforementioned is only indicative because, if I am to make a complete list of Orientalists’ and Africanists’ persistent effort of minimization of the achievements, the exploits and the unparalleled radiation of the Ancient Oriental and African civilizations, I will need a 100-volume encyclopedia.

Point 3 – Usurpation of an Ancient African Civilization: Ancient Crete is not a European island or civilization

Third, in their evil effort to fallaciously represent the Ancient Oriental civilizations, the Western European Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists depicted a genuinely African civilization as European: Minoan Crete. This disgraceful usurpation of African Heritage (King Minos was an Ancient Egyptian and he did indeed bear the name of an Ancient Egyptian God) was vitally necessary to the spiritual genocidal gangsters of the Western European universities, because they wanted to pretend that European History starts in Crete as early as 2500 BCE and offer thus a civilized Antiquity to the European barbarian past. This evil attempt orchestrated before more than 100 years by a most disreputable English pseudo-archaeologist, Arthur Evans, is a paranoid aberration.

Point 4 – Selected popularization of historical snapshots from the Ancient World to distort the average Westerners’ education and culture and to turn Europeans and Americans into racist supremacists

Fourth, the Western European and North American Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists undertook a vast but vicious project of selected popularization of historical snapshots from the Ancient World. Their yet unnoticed technique, which brings calamitous results in terms of historical forgery and total misrepresentation of the World History while also exonerating the scholars and academics of the Western World, consists in the attitude to expand (or diffuse or popularize) at the general public level prejudicially more about Herodotus and abysmally less about the Annals of Assurbanipal, more about the tragedies of Sophocles and less about the Assyrian-Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh, more about the discourses of Demosthenes and less about the Hittite epic of Ullikummi, and so on, and so on. Publishing houses, newspapers, TV channels, radio programs, weekly magazines and monthly reviews, as well as major Internet portals and mainstream sites have been ordered to proceed in this manner, and – worse – their home and school education predestines them to continue the evil practice. At this point again, the long list of the Western colonial deceitful priorities and sophisticated distortions would cover many volumes. Particularly, when it comes to the overwhelming Oriental and African impact on the foundations and the formation of civilizations in Europe, all average people in Europe and in North America are deliberately misinformed and systematically deceived.

Point 5 – Colonized nations prevented from studying, honoring, reassessing and delving into their historical past and cultural heritage

Fifth, the Western European and North American Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists systematically prevented all the indigenous nations from thoroughly studying their own past, from accurately assessing the unmatched greatness of their Cultural Heritage and from meticulously examining their ancestors’ determinant and overwhelming impact on the lower civilizations of Ancient Greece and Rome. Evil ideologies, historical forgeries, and political nonsense are mobilized in this case in order to totally disorient the indigenous nations of Asia and Africa: Fake Pan-Arabism, political Islam, Wahhabism, Marxism – Leninism, Fascism, Western Liberalism, Evolutionism, Materialism, Consumerism, Modernism, etc.

A very typical example is given by the education, the culture, the publications and the mass media of Egypt; although average Egyptians get an idea about the History of Ancient Egypt during the 3rd and the 2nd millennia BCE and also learn about the Islamic periods of History, they know nothing about the history of their country from the Iranian invasion under Cambyses II (525 BCE) to the arrival of Islam (642 CE).

Yet, Late Antiquity is Ancient Egypt’s most important period of History, because it is at those times that Ancient Egyptian religions, cults, faiths and concepts truly speaking ‘invaded’ Ancient Greece, Rome and the entire European continent where hundreds of Egyptian archaeological sites have been excavated. Western European Egyptologists brought to daylight hundreds of ancient temples of Isis, Horus, Osiris, Sarapis, Anubis and other Ancient Egyptian concepts of divinity on European soil but no one, either in Europe or in Egypt and the rest of the world knows about it. Greek Isidists, adepts and believers of the Egyptian divinity Isis, traveled (3rd c. BCE – 4th c. CE) as pilgrims from Greece to Philae Island, 5 km south of Aswan, to venerate the world’s holiest temple of Isis and to write inscriptions on the temple’s walls, but this is worldwide prohibited knowledge for average people in Egypt, Greece, Europe and the rest of the world.

It is during the Ptolemaic and Roman times that appear in Egypt numerous schools of faith, religions, cults and philosophies that we now call Gnosis or Gnosticisms. From Egypt, Gnostics’ teachings, preaching, cosmogonies and eschatological revelations where diffused to NW Africa, Europe, East Africa, and India. Yet, today’s Egyptians know nothing about Gnostics, Hermetics and Manichaeans.

Point 6 – Post-Renaissance European sickness, barbarism, pseudo-literature, bogus-philosophy, and corrupt dementia diffused and tyrannically imposed worldwide as “Civilization”

Sixth, the Western colonials dictatorially imposed and methodically (through bribed local stooges) projected onto all the colonized nations of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe the immoral, inhuman and utterly lawless elements of their bogus-intellectual life, i.e. the worthless trash of Moliere, Racine, Rousseau, Coleridge, Kipling, Victor Hugo, Karl Marx, Albert Camus, Jean Paul Sartre, Lenin, and their likes. This effort constituted an unprecedented profanation and an unmatched barbarization process that plunged the entire world to the early stages of the present chaotic disorder and irrevocable disintegration.

Yet, the Tuareg and the Berbers of the African Atlas, the Hausa of Nigeria, the Bantu of the African South, the Cushitic Africans of the Horn region, the Egyptian Copts, the Muslims and the Hindus of India, the Christians of Malabar, the Yazidis of Iraq and Armenia, the Turkic nations across Asia, the many different nations of Iran, Russia, China and SE Asia did not need to forget their illustrious past and noble authors, poets, mystics, erudite polymaths, philosophers and scholars in order to absorb the cultural excrement of Europe and North America.

Point 7 – An evil plan of total cultural – academic – educational disconnection among all the nations of the world was successfully implemented without anyone noticing it

Seventh, the Western colonials deployed an unparalleled effort to disconnect the colonized nations from one another; this has been the most criminal act that they have ever perpetrated. Due to this detrimental fact,

1- there are no Moroccan Egyptologists

2- there are no Nigerian Iranologists

3- there are no Somali Assyriologists

4- there are no Afghani specialists in Coptic Language, Literature and History

5- there are no Uzbek specialists in Hausa and Berber

6- there are no Pakistani specialists in Aztec hieroglyphics

7- there are no Indian specialists in Hittite Language, Literature and History

8- there are no Tanzanian specialists in Tatar Language, Literature and History

9- there are no Algerian specialists in Chinese Manichaeism

10- there are no Filipino specialists in Zoroastrianism

11- there are no Peruvian specialists in Mithraism

12- there are no Egyptian specialists in Confucianism

13- there are no Turkish specialists in Quechua, Aymara and other Andes languages

14- there are no Malay specialists in Sumerian

15- there are no Azeri specialists in Carthage and Carthaginian Language and History

and so on, and so on.

———————————————————-

21 Bezeklik Caves Turfan

Universities in Peru, Argentina, Cameroon, South Africa, Kenya, Sudan, Iraq, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia must not offer seminars about the Bezeklik caves in Turfan (Eastern Turkestan, Sinkiang – China), the Manichaean wall paintings, and the diffusion of Manichaeism in China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Sweden, Belgium and France.   

 

21 Panjikent Tajik

21 Panjikent

Universities in Venezuela, Colombia, Algeria, Egypt, Tanzania, Yemen, Madagascar, Philippines, and Vietnam must not offer seminars about the Sogdian Civilization, History and Art (as attested in Panjikent wall paintings in today’s Tajikistan), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Canada, Spain and Italy. 

22 Sogdian Manichaean

Universities in Congo, Chile, Morocco, Iraq, Angola, Azerbaijan, Thailand, Myanmar, and Pakistan must not offer seminars about Manichaeism and its diffusion from NW Africa to Egypt to China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Australia, and Germany. 

 

24 wall painting Nestorian church Bezeklik

25 nestorian tablet China

Universities in Ghana, Brazil, Paraguay, Jordan, Uganda, Zambia, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Iran, and India must not offer seminars about Nestorian Christianity and its diffusion from Mesopotamia to Bezeklik (Eastern Turkestan – first picture) to the historical center of Imperial China (second picture), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Denmark, England, Finland, Poland, and Russia. 

 

23 kuh-khwajeh mural

Universities in China, Uruguay, Taiwan, South Africa, Cambodia, Sudan, Malaysia, Greece, Syria, Georgia and Afghanistan must not offer seminars about the wall paintings of the Arsacid – Sassanid palaces at Kuh-i Khajeh near Zabol, Iran, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Italy, Belgium, Holland, Canada, Austria and the US. 

26 khotan king vaisravana

Universities in Mexico, Zimbabwe, Albania, Bolivia, Senegal, Romania, Iran, Guatemala, Tunisia, Armenia, Bulgaria, and Saudi Arabia must not offer seminars about Khotan, Khotanese language, Khotanese Buddhism and the Celestial King Vaisravana, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in England, France, Germany and Sweden. 

 

doc778sshlsu50ia1d762

Universities in Brazil, Indonesia, UAE, Vietnam, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Morocco and Nigeria must not offer seminars about India’s Ajanta Caves and their frescoes, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Canada, the US, Holland, Austria, and England.

 

———————————————————–

Notice carefully the countries that I offer as case studies! I don’t give small countries as examples; the smallest among them is Azerbaijan (with ca. 10 million people). The selection of paradigms was deliberate. Some people may ask why it should be

a) Azerbaijan’s priority to have specialists in Carthage and Carthaginian Language and History,

b) Somalia’s priority to have Assyriologists, and

c) Afghanistan’s priority to have specialists in Coptic Language, Literature and History.

These questions are paranoid; they are made by either ignorant idiots or bribed criminals who merely implement Western policies that destroy the entire world through this systematic disconnection among the formerly colonized countries.

The world’s worst fallacy is that new countries need studies and faculties in Engineering, Economics, Finance & Banking, Business Administration, IT and the like. All these fields help countries only to become the realms of besotted people and silly local elites that are easily cheated by the evil colonial powers and their diplomats.

Countries without a complete array of Humanities (as per above) in their universities are a filthy trash of impotent monkeys that are dealt with by the colonial powers in the manner Saddam Hussein, Qaddafi, Mubarak, Ali Abdallah Saleh, and many others were thrown out of power.

Humanities must cover 50% of a country’s universities’ academic staff if a country wants to be a standalone entity and not the trashy plaything of every colonial gangster named Macron, Tony Blair or Obama. One could certainly expand much on this topic, but this is not possible within the limits of a simple response. However, I will suggest you in this regard to see things through another viewpoint, which will make perhaps everything easier for you.

Why should small countries like Finland, Sweden, Austria, Czechia, Belgium, Switzerland, Belgium and Holland (with less than 20 million people each of them) have specialists on almost all of the aforementioned academic fields and countries with more than 30 or 40 million people (as per my above examples) have none?

By the way, only the aforementioned practice is quite enough to prove that UNESCO is a vicious colonial institution that helps not unite but divide the different nations worldwide.

Even worse, there is more to it. The aforementioned colonial system of total cultural – academic – educational disconnection was implemented successfully not only among countries of different cultural and historical backgrounds (such as Peru, Angola, Somalia, Myanmar, South Korea, Kazakhstan and Romania) but also among all the Muslim countries, which one could think that they would be better connected at all the above mentioned levels since they evidently share a common heritage. Unfortunately, today’s Muslims are totally unaware of their common heritage, and for this reason the silly and uneducated sheikhs find it easy to pull large populations to fake beliefs, distorted History (as per the needs of the colonial powers), and self-disastrous fanaticism and extremism.

As a matter of fact, the vast disaster caused worldwide by the colonial criminals in this regard can be more emphatically attested within today’s Islamic World. In a nutshell, Muslims do not know one another, because the colonial gangsters limited the ignorant sheikhs of today’s fake Islam into a narrative parody of Prophet Muhammad’s life and few extra points – that are all perceived by Muslims as a “political opposition” to the West. This has been a subtle colonial trickery, because this is the only way to lead today’s Muslims to permanent underdevelopment, ignorance, silly fanaticism, and an abysmal misreading of the Islamic History.

What today’s Muslims know as Islam is NOT Islam.

And not even 1% of the History of Islamic Civilization is known among today’s Muslims. More specifically, at the level of secondary education (whereby in Italy, Italian pupils study texts of Ancient Roman poets, authors, historians and philosophers),

1- not one Moroccan pupil studies excerpts from Tabari

2- not one Nigerian pupil studies excerpts from Jelaleddin Rumi

3- not one Libyan pupil studies excerpts from Nizami Ganjavi

4- not one Egyptian pupil studies excerpts from Ferdowsi

5- not one Somali pupil studies excerpts from Ibn Hazm

6- not one Tanzanian pupil studies excerpts from Mohyieldin ibn Arabi

7- not one Sudanese pupil studies excerpts from Babur

8- not one Iraqi pupil studies excerpts from Al Makrizi

9- not one Syrian pupil studies excerpts from Ibn Khaldun

10- not one Azeri pupil studies excerpts from Al Farabi

11- not one Turkmen pupil studies excerpts from Al Qurtubi

12- not one Pakistani pupil studies excerpts from Nasir al din al Tusi

13- not one Indonesian pupil studies excerpts from Ibn Rushd

Even worse, today’s fake Muslims have no idea about any Islamic monuments outside their own country:

A- Senegalese do not know even the existence of the Samarqand Observatory, which was the world’s leading institution of its time (15th c.), built by Ulugh Beg, a consummate astronomer and the world’s most erudite king of the last 2000 years

B- Mauritanians do not know the existence of the Maragheh Observatory in Iran

C- Sudanese do not know the existence of Divrigi mosque at Sivas, Turkey – which is the only Seljuk mosque with Indian style decoration

D- Egyptians do not know the existence of the illustrious Masjid-e Shah (Mosque) at Esfahan, Iran

E- Yemenis do not know the existence of Registan esplanade at Samarqand with the three illustrious medresas (religious schools)

F- Indonesians do not know the existence of Queen Arwa Mosque in Jibla, Yemen whereby the illustrious queen of the Sulayhid dynasty left the best token of her rule.

One can fill volumes with similar paradigms of cultural ignorance which are all due to the fake theological dogmas presently taught as ‘Islam’ among Muslims as per the colonial orders that the idiotic sheikhs implement.

—————————————————–

Yes, you are right! Entire verses of the Hymns to Aton have been preserved in the otherwise ‘genuine’ texts of the Biblical Psalms.

About the Singapore analogy: teaching History means representing accurately past moments to present people. Examples must be striking.

In the 20th c. it was easy for an army to advance 2000 km; hm!! Before 3600 years, it was not so easy for armies to cover such distance and destroy the faraway target successfully. So, now, you can understand how great was the victory of the Hittite King Mursilis I, who invaded Babylon in 1596 BCE.

All the best and best regards,

Shamsaddin

——————————————————

Download this article in Word doc:

The Colonial Powers’ Most Ominous and Secret Evildoing

Turkey & 21st c. Geopolitics: the Advice I gave to the Turkish Establishment back in the mid-90s

Turkey, the US & 21st c. Geopolitics: the Advice I gave to the Turkish Establishment back in the mid-90s

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

The changes occurred in the period 1989 – 1991 have not until now been accurately evaluated; neither have their consequences been assessed. In the folly of those days, few perspicacious persons were able to see that, with the collapse of the so-called ‘Eastern bloc’, the decomposition and demise of the so-called ‘Western bloc’ was automatically heralded. The destruction of the then international order’s second pillar would then only be a matter of time, i.e. few decades.

 

I. 1989-1991 and the Collapse of Post-WW II False Order

The American elite, political or academic, must have realized the ensued dangers and that’s why they tried to amuse and confuse the world with much publicized, yet inane, pseudo-doctrines, like the Clash of Civilizations and the End of History. These unreal, yet barbarian and evil, concepts were elaborated only as preventive tactics for the US to avoid the unavoidable.

In fact, the astute observation that the fall of the ‘Eastern bloc’ would sooner or later bring forth the eradication of the ‘Western bloc’ had little to do with the common, yet nonsensical, assumption that the events of the period 1989 – 1991 would have a political – ideological or a financial – economic or even a social – intellectual impact. These types of impact are indeed minor, if the events are evaluated from a historian’s viewpoint.

In reality, the formation of the post-WW II international order was an abnormal, artificial construction, pretty much like the establishment of the post-WW I world order. The difference is that in the period between the two world wars there appeared to still exist, act and evolve – within the context of human life – several human and spiritual forces and factors that were totally concealed out of the artificial post-WW II world. Then, the collapse of one major constituent of that fake world would automatically unleash at least part of the concealed forces and factors whose dynamics in turn would easily bring down the rest of the artificial fabrication.

So, all post 1989-1991 developments have in reality little to do with the proper impact that the event itself has had (which was minor) and are mainly due to the forceful comeback of earlier concealed forces.

It was therefore predestined – from the very elements of the dynamics created by the results of the two world wars – that the winners of those early and minor conflicts would inevitably be the losers of the end times’ war.

And as early as 1992 and 1993, it became clear to few that North America and Western Europe had lost the chance – if they ever had any – to advance fast and effectively in the prevention of the forthcoming collapse of the ‘Western bloc’.

The above was very clear in my mind, when I moved to Turkey in September 1994 to work for universities, foundations and institutes, to participate in several academic and political projects, to advise the military and political establishment on several issues, to speak in public and in secluded circles, and to contribute to the universal(ist) ideals and principles defended and promoted by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

 

II. Kemal Ataturk and today’s Turkish Establishment

Back in the 90s, there were many Turks, who would automatically ascribe themselves to Kemal Atatürk’s ideals and the principles. And I believe that by now their number has decreased only by little.

There were indeed in 1990s’ Turkey several leading academics, diplomats, politicians and statesmen, generals and intellectuals, as well as military intelligence officers, who were very well informed about the nature of the aforementioned world developments, which then were still quite recent. I therefore encountered and worked with brilliant people, like Prof. Erol Manisalı (whom I first met in the late 80s) and film director Halit Refiğ; with both of them I had frequent meetings, lengthy discussions, and fruitful polarizations. They had already understood what the global developments really meant and what the forthcoming circumstances would be like. The ensuing dangers for Turkey were very clear to them.

The same concerns a pleiad of other distinguished personalities whom I encountered on several occasions, namely Ambassador Umut Arık, Prof. Reşat Genç of the venerated Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Prof. Gönül Tankut, Prof. Hüseyin Hatemi, Prof. Kutlu Emre, Ambassador İsmail Soysal, Prof. Metin Sözen, Şemsettin Bağırkan the true savant of Ottoman Classical Music, Prof. Yusuf Halaçoğlu of the celebrated Türk Tarih Kurumu, Prof. Yılmaz Altuğ, my one-time colleague Prof. Emel Doğramacı, and many others involving former prime ministers Tansu Ciller and Necmettin Erbakan.

As a matter of fact, the clumsy American efforts to avoid the unavoidable and the then newly emitted pseudo-doctrines would only help bring the dismemberment of the ‘Western bloc’ faster; by so doing, the US was de facto self-positioned as enemy of Turkey, because the aforementioned pseudo-doctrines – by their genuine distortion of the historical truth and due to their disregard of the international order – targeted the country directly.

The inanity of people like Huntington and Fukuyama is tragicomical indeed! By trying to ‘remake the world order’ (this is part of Huntington’s title: The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order), they contributed to the demolition of the ‘Western bloc’. Their suicidal effort resembled very much indeed the suicide bombers trained by the CIA and the Mosad in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Syria and elsewhere. To remake the world order, they solemnly and explicitly decomposed the elements of the remaining ‘Western bloc’. To prevent the forthcoming destruction, they precipitated it.

Since 1994, it was clear to the aforementioned leading figures and to others in Turkey that Turkey was threatened with exclusion from the ‘Western bloc’ and with dismemberment pretty much like several other countries for which the same ominous fate was prescribed.

However, for every action there is a reaction, and for every scheme there is a way to outmaneuver it. In the mid 90s, I spoke extensively and I expanded in written form (not always public) about what it would take for Turkey to oppose the plans providing for its destruction. When I left Turkey in 1997, I knew that, by staying inactive, Ankara was playing indeed into the US game. In fact, what occurs now between Turkey and the US could have already happened before 20 years.

It was just a matter of time, appeasement policies, and procrastination as regards the need for a proper geopolitical concept as regards 21st c. Turkey. This attitude would drive to nowhere and Turkey has been a great loser over the past two decades, which is what then inimical, mainstream mass media hide (as this situation suits the interests that they serve), by making either misplaced eulogies or conflated descriptions (of the type ‘Erdogan is unpredictable and dangerous’ & ‘Erdogan is a new sultan’!).

Why did the Turkish establishment fail to drastically react against US plans over the past 20 years?

61.jpg

III. Factors that prevented the Turkish Establishment from timely Disentangling from the ‘Western bloc’

A. Failure to accurately and integrally assess Kemal Atatürk’s Vision of State

The Founder of Turkey, as a genuine pragmatist, did not found an ideology-based state. There is no such thing as ideology, political ideology or political philosophy; those endeavors are all forms of anti-historical forgery composed and diffused in order to unnecessarily and viciously trigger calamitous developments. They are worthless propaganda, and every propaganda is worthless, pathetic and evil. World History does not encompass ideologies, political ideologies or political philosophies because all those systems are mere propaganda tools deprived of historicity, morality and veracity, having therefore no ingenuous contents; they all constitute forms of forgery and fallacy that serve the enslavement of the nations and the destruction of Human Life.

Actually, there are no ideologists, political ideologists or political scientists and those who pretend or are said to be are either disoriented idiots or degenerate paranoids or motivated agents. This is easy to understand as there have never been ideologists, political ideologists or political scientists in the World History prior to Modern Times; but Modern Times are the period of worldwide deception which was incepted in order to precisely trigger the enslavement of the nations and the destruction of Human Life.

As Kemal Ataturk did not found an ideology-based state, what was later attributed to him as ‘kemalism’ hinges on particular interests to deform and alter his real practices. As a matter of fact, one of the six principles of Turkey, Halkçılık (which is not accurately translated as ‘Populism’ in English / the correct translation would be ‘rule by the people and for the people’) clearly opposes all ideologies.

People ruling their society need no -ism, no ideology. In fact, every -ism, every ideology is an intentional distortion of a self-ruled society, which occurs by introducing unnecessary and evil elites. Prior to the Modern Times, there were never ‘elites’, and every opposite claim is genuinely criminal, utterly fallacious, and historically false; it constitutes a premeditated misinterpretation of History. To this historical reality Kemal Ataturk ascribed himself.

I would rather translate Halkçılık as ‘People’s Sovereignty’; in this regard, every ideology, philosophical system, theoretical structure (of ethnic / racial, religious or political order) generated by an elite member (academic, scientist, philosopher, intellectual, etc.) automatically threatens people’s sovereignty and is therefore to be rejected. People’s sovereignty is incompatible with theories and ideas emitted by segregated individuals.

As a matter of fact, the translation of the six principles of Turkey with English words ending in – ism is sheer, if not deliberate, distortion and forceful alteration of the historical reality. This is so, because nouns ending in -ism in English are relevant of ideologies (conservatism, liberalism, etc).

Even worse, the entire phenomenon of Turkey’s foundation by Kemal Atatürk is fallaciously viewed by Western scholars in terms of a hypothetical, yet nonexistent, ideology: Kemalism. Kemalism never existed, because Kemal Atatürk was not a ‘philosopher’, did not compose an ‘ideology’, and never accepted ‘politics’.

Look now at this erroneous Wikipedia entry: “There are six fundamental pillars (ilke) of the ideology” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kemalism)!

Where are these principles (not ‘pillars’; ilke means ‘principle’) first stated?

In the 1924 Constitutional Law Article 2, Clause 1 (Türkiye Devleti, Cümhuriyetçi, milliyetçi, halkçı, devletçi, lâik ve inkılâpçıdır). But the Constitutional Law describes the basics of a state, not an ideology, as the wholly mistaken entry of Wikipedia states. https://web.archive.org/web/20110826235341/http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/index.php?l=template&id=20&lang=0

It is therefore essential to understand that ideologies, political philosophies, and related systems derive from politics, but Kemal Atatürk did not use a word about ‘politics’, was not a ‘politician’, and – as I already said – never accepted or carried out politics. This is evident in the basic texts of the state that he founded and in his 19-year long practice of rule.

Many confuse Atatürk’s modernization of the social structures with a certain, nebulous, Westernization, but the fact that until Atatürk’s death Turkey had only one party speaks for itself. The Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi in the beginning was not a ‘political’ party; it was the organization of all Turks who were interested in participating in the effort of reconstruction of their land. This organization was actually set up in the Sivas Congress (4-11/9/1919), which was in fact the venue of a ‘movement’, namely the Türk Ulusal Hareketi (Turkish National Movement); it was later renamed as Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.

The Western political concept of ‘ideological, political parties’ did not exist in the nascent state’s territories in 1919 and it was virulently prohibited in 1924. Now, you can read for yourself and, after identifying Wikipedia’s enormous distortions, get the correct meaning:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sivas_Congress

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_National_Movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_People%27s_Party_(Turkey)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-party_period_of_the_Republic_of_Turkey

Politics is the focus of evil in modern societies, but politics lay far from Kemal Atatürk. Modern definitions of politics are part of the problem, as they try to shed confusion as regards the nature of politics. Example: ” Politics (from Greek: πολιτικά, translit. Politiká, meaning “affairs of the cities”) is the process of making decisions that apply to members of a group. It refers to achieving and exercising positions of governance—organized control over a human community, particularly a state. In modern nation-states, people have formed political parties to represent their ideas. They agree to take the same position on many issues and agree to support the same changes to law and the same leaders”. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics)

This is entirely false; even the translation from Ancient Greek is wrong. It is not ‘the affairs of the cities’ but ‘the affair of the city’, and it means only a small city that was not organized as kingdom, because otherwise the city would be a ‘kingdom’ and would have no politics!

 

DEMOCRACY AND POLITICS STARTED IN MESOPOTAMIA

The ‘affair of the city’ did indeed appear as a form of non royal, social organization and administration in 4th millennium BCE Mesopotamia; this early democratic system of rule can be called ‘politics’ but it had no notion of today’s decayed and corrupt, inhuman politics. It lasted several hundreds of years among the Sumerian cities-states of Southern Mesopotamia, before the rise of priesthood and royalty put an end to it, by imposing the spiritual concept of Celestial Order among humans. This Primitive Democracy is very well documented by means of early Sumerian texts and archaeological evidence that shows total absence of palaces, temples and major buildings. One has to admit that the notion of ‘state’ was elementary in that period.

DEMOCRACY IN 2ND MILLENNIUM BCE ELAM – SOUTHERN TRANSTIGRITANE

Later on, ‘politics’ and ‘democracy’ appear again in the 2nd millennium BCE Mesopotamia and Transtigritane, long before the few ancient Greek cities-states that were not ruled by kings were organized as either oligarchies, tyrannies or democracies. When most of the world’s civilized countries were organized in universal empires and kingdoms that reflected the Celestial Order (Assyria, Babylonia, the Hittite Empire, the Hurrian kingdoms, Canaanite Ugarit, Pharaonic Egypt, the Cushitic Kerma kingdom, etc.), Elam (known as ‘Anshan and Sushan’ in Ancient Elamite, which was the local language, ‘Elam’ being the Assyrian-Babylonian appellation of that land) was ruled without kings for several hundreds of years. Ancient Elam was the earliest form of ancient state that was ruled by local, elected executive officers, known as the Sukkalmahhu (‘mayors’) and mainly documented in Assyrian – Babylonian texts (http://evariste.lefeuvre.free.fr/culture/elcoa/elam.htm).

DEMOCRACY IN 1ST MILLENNIUM BCE MEDITERRANEAN: A PJOENICIAN – CARTHAGINIAN INVENTION AND PRACTICE LONG BEFORE IT WAS EXPORTED AMONG GREEKS AND ROMANS

 

In the Mediterranean world, politics and democracy emerged first among the Phoenician colonies, Carthage, and the Carthaginian colonies of Western Mediterranean and Northwestern Africa; this is so because the Phoenician kings were located faraway to rule their colonies; a non royal form of self rule was then instituted. However, the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians impacted the Pelasgians, the Lycians, the Carians, the Ionians, the Aeolians, the Achaeans, the Dorians, the Caphthor – Cretans, the Sicilians, the Sardinians and other nations in Western Anatolia, South Balkans, the Italian Peninsula, and the islands of the Mediterranean. In all those lands, Phoenicians and Carthaginians diffused the basic notions of non royal rule and administration.

Kemal Atatürk understood quite well that Western politics (as practiced until his times) were a fraudulent fallacy, which by means of representatives usurped people’s sovereignty. That’s why in numerous cases he stated that Hakimiyet Kayıtsız Şartsız Milletindir (Sovereignty belongs unrestrictedly and unconditionally to the people/nation). Thence, the importance of halkçılık, people’s sovereignty.

To put it in simple words, Atatürk made of the people the Emperor of an Empire named Türkiye. This, quite unfortunately, was not evident to the so-called Kemalist friends of mine in Turkey, all those who evoked his name but thought and lived otherwise back in the 1990s.

Ataturk dancing waltz.png

B. The Real Meaning of the Six Principles of Kemal Ataturk’s State

How to render in English the six principles of Atatürk’s state?

Cumhuriyetçilik – it has to do with the Arabic word jumhur, ‘public’ or ‘majority’ (مذبح الجمهور / madhhab al-jumhur). This comes as opposition to both, the hereditary rule (monarchy) and the religious – spiritual rule. It is very wrong to call ‘republicanism’ this approach to state structure and to social organization; in reality, the correct translation of the term cumhuriyetçilik would be ‘public, not hereditary rule, and separation between public affairs and spirituality’. Turkey’s cumhuriyetçilik has very little to do with 18th – 20th c. Western republicanism.

Halkçılık – as already explained, this means ‘people’s sovereignty’.

Milliyetçilik – this principle has nothing to do with what is called ‘nationalism’ in Central and Western Europe and North America. In striking opposition to West European ideologies of racism, race superiority, chauvinism, and nationalism, in Turkey it was declared that Türkiye ahalisine, din ve ırk farkı gözetilmeksizin vatandaşlık itibarıyla Türk denilir (irrespective of religion and race differences, the population of Turkey is called Turkish as regards the citizenship).

The use of the term Milliyet in Atatürk’s Turkey and in the Ottoman Empire is completely different. In structural terms, this word of Persian origin (milliyet) was used by the founder of Turkey as the word Ummah was used in the very early periods of the Islamic Caliphate. It involves a supra-national community with a common history within the same state. And this was said explicitly: ‘ortak mazi, tarih, ahlak ve hukuk Türk milletini bir araya getiren değerlerdir’ (common past, history, morality and law are the values that bring together the Turkish nation). This has nothing to do with the evil notion of racial ethnic identity; it alludes to cultural ethnic identity.

So, milliyetçilik means literally ‘supra-national identity founded on land-based communal unity, shared historicity and integrity of cultural heritage’. This connotation does not exist anywhere outside Turkey, and this is not a concept particularity but full evidence of human superiority over the forces of darkness, division and evilness of today’s inhuman elites.

Few people understood that it was quite normal for a great mystic like Mustafa Kemal, who was neither a historian nor a philologist, to have this approach. The constituent elements of the state that he had already envisioned (as a successive form to the ailing Ottoman Empire) before 1919 had to encompass many ethnic groups. As a matter of fact, when Atatürk took full control of Turkey’s territory, it was still expected that more than a million ethnic ‘Greeks’ (i.e. Romioi – Rumlar) would be Turkish citizens in the future. It is the Greek side at the Lausanne Conference that came up with the proposal for the exchange of populations that took place between Turkey and Greece in 1923-1925.

Furthermore, this approach to a ‘supra-national identity founded on land-based communal unity, shared historicity and integrity of cultural heritage’ reflects perfectly well the Celestial Order of the Oriental Empires, which was the cornerstone of Rudolf von Sebottendorf’s universal vision of an Imperial State  enshrined in individual spirituality and human welfare as per the Ancient Oriental Monarchical Model and the Assyrian Sargonid Originality.

Because the 20th century’s leading German hierophant, and mentor of Kemal Atatürk, Rudolf von Sebottendorf remains an unknown figure to most, truly few understand the uniqueness and the truthfulness of Turkey as a conscious supra-nation rightful heir of more than 20 Oriental and Occidental, northern and southern civilizations’ achievements and accomplishments. And this was eminently reflected in Kemal Atatürk’s practices, as he rejected Pan-Turkism and Turanism as improper falsifications able only to distort the historical reality and plunge Turkey into chaos.

Turkey was geared to be the total rejection of the fallacious and unhistorical, racist concept of racial purity, chauvinism, race superiority, skin color supremacy, colorism and all the associate, nonsensical and evil constructions.

One can therefore understand that Hitler’s Germany was at the very antipodes of Atatürk’s Turkey’s and this is due to the fact that the spiritual exercises and other practices, the evocations, the divine conceptualization, the revelations of the Sacred, the initiation rituals, the Spiritual Ontology, the Cosmology, the Moral Order, the Royal Art, the Weltanschauung, the historical contextualization, and the admonitions of imperial rule changed totally in the Thule Gesellschaft after the organization was taken over by Anglo-Saxon fake Masonry, Zionists and other Satanists.

Laiklik – this principle is falsely translated as either Secularism or Laicism. Although Wikipedia statement “it differs from the passive Anglo-American concept of secularism, but is similar to the concept of laïcité in France.” is correct to some extent, the basic definition is totally wrong: “Kemalist ideology aims to banish religious interference in government affairs”. There was no Kemalist ideology; more importantly, the practice was not only to just ‘banish religious interference in government affairs’, but to dissociate the social order from the Spirituality and the spiritual life of the people.

The concept does not affect only the government, the public administration or the state, but the entire society; it stipulates that the social life of the people is disconnected from their spiritual faith(s), religion(s) and cult(s). In fact, it makes of the faith of everyone a private affair and in doing so, it reflects the quintessence of all original faiths and religions, as per which ‘religion’ is the ‘direct connection between the human and God’, thus involving no intermediaries.

The use of word ‘laik’ in Modern Turkish must not lead to confusion with other notions and connotations; this word originates from Ancient Greek ‘laos’ which means people in opposition to ‘hierateion’ (the sacerdotal class). Since Turkey is the realm whereby Halkçılık prevails, there cannot be social classes and elites; and consequently, there cannot be priests, as they would form a separate class of their own.

Kemal Ataturk had studied History under the guidance of Rudolf von Sebottendorf, understood the realities of Muslim deviations throughout the centuries, and drawn the correct conclusion. In Early Islam, there was no priesthood at all; in fact, there must not be any priesthood in Islam; it is prohibited. The rise of the priestly class of sheikhs is the result of Islam’s deviation and Christianization, an attempt undertaken by the vicious, ignorant and barbaric pseudo-theologian Ahmed ibn Taimiyyah (13th-14th c.). Kemal Ataturk, by imposing Laiklik, solved the problem that brought down the Ottoman Empire.

It is clear that the writers, who composed the 1924 Constitutional Law, invented new words and terms in Turkish that did not exist during the Ottoman Empire. To do so, they had to be and they were actually resourceful. In fact, Halkçılık and Laiklik are the same word; what ‘halk’ means in Turkish is ‘laos’ in Greek (: people); what matters in this case is the new connotation that the writers of the 1924 Constitutional Law attributed to each word, under the guidance of Kemal Ataturk. And these new connotations fully reflect the practices that we attest in Atarurk’s times and not in later distortions or foreign uses. That’s why we cannot make any equation between ‘laiklik’ in Ataturk’s Turkey and ‘laïcité’ in France.

Devletçilik – this principle was monstrously misinterpreted by Kemal Ataturk’s renegades who were on the payroll of Western Freemasonic and Zionist nomenklatura, intelligentsia and apparatchiks. For numerous decades, these distorters of Kemal Ataturk’s evident practices used the meaning of this word (devletçilik) in order to portray the founder of Turkey as a defender of state-run economy, as a supporter of socioeconomic ideas related to Communism or Nazism, and as a pioneer of hydrocephalic bureaucracy. This falsehood finds its way with the false translation of devletçilik as ‘statism’.

The Turkish word state ‘devlet’ originates from the Farsi and Arabic words ‘Dowlah’, which also mean ‘state’. But as principle by which the new state’s function had to abide, devletçilik does not mean state-run economy or statism or prevalence of the state in every person’s daily life and economic activity.

In fact, Kemal Ataturk’s governmental practices during the period 1923-1938 clearly show the meaning of this word and the true connotation that the writers of the 1924 Constitutional Law attributed to it; they truly nationalized many companies. But they did so in order to restructure the companies and then they offered them to the private initiative. Kemal Ataturk was obviously against the idea of the state running the economy; but the state had to be there not to intervene but to rectify troubles, solve problems, eliminate clutter, and reinstate free market rules. As long as Kemal Ataturk was alive, there was no state interventionism in Turkey in the sense this term is used nowadays.

Devletçilik means therefore that the state umpires every time a need arises for this; this does not apply only to economy, but to justice, education and other aspects of social life as well.

Devrimcilik (or at times İnkılapçılık) – this principle should not be translated as ‘reformism’ in English, because this term is already heavily impacted ideologically and is therefore unrelated to the connotation attributed to it during Kemal Ataturk’s times. Devrim means ‘reform’ or ‘reformation’ in Turkish. İnkılap is a loan from Farsi and Arabic; it is often translated as ‘revolution’ but this is wrong. Revolution in Arabic is ‘thawrah’ (ثورة). Enqelab (انقلاب) means ‘coup’, ‘reverse’ or ‘upheaval’. In Farsi, the term was used for ‘Islamic revolution’ (انقلاب اسلامی) but this is a politically motivated use.

In Ataturk’s Turkey, both terms were used totally deprived of any related connotation; they actually meant ‘readiness for continuous updates in order to keep the pace with changes’; in this sense, one can associate the term with ‘reform’ but not as an idea or an ideological indoctrination, but as a practical necessity – whenever and wherever it appears.

Devrimcilik was then viewed as the total rejection of the Ottoman immobility, motionlessness and inability to adapt to the surrounding world’s changing realities and traits. In fact, in 15 years (1923-1938), Ataturk covered 400 years of Western changes and technological transformations, adapting the country to the 20th c. realities. It was the most resolute rejection of the silly sheikhs’ and idiotic imams’ attitude to keep the average people in permanently stagnant ignorance and darkness, detached from the realities of the world. But devrimcilik has nothing to do with an ideologized attitude and thoughtless reform (: corruption / degradation) of ideals and principles.

However, the above realities had already gone long before I first traveled to Turkey, let alone the time I moved to work there. The constitutions of 1961 and 1982 were written in total discordance with the basic principles of Kemal Ataturk’s Constitutions 1921 and (revised) 1924.

This in reality meant that back in the 1990s my Kemalist friends were trying to maintain Kemal Ataturk’s vision, principles, and heritage within a frame that does not allow this vision to exist, these principles to be implemented, and this heritage to be revered. The Turkish establishment after 1938 and notably after 1946, under Western pressure, introduced what could not be introduced in the state of Kemal Ataturk: multi-party elections.

This was not conform with the basic standards and principles of the Constitution and of Kemal Ataturk’s practices. Halkçılık (‘people’s sovereignty’) cannot coexist with the fallacy of multi-party elections. And the change was not a necessary update and reform or the state, but a sheer deviation to appease Western countries’ diplomats and politicians. In fact, multi-party elections, i.e. a masqueraded tyranny that institutes an evil elite against the people / nation, existed in several Western countries when Kemal Ataturk founded Turkey. If he considered that this element of the Western states’ structure and functions was necessary in nascent Turkey, he would introduce it as well. But he did not.

This was what back in the 1990s my friends among Turkey’s Kemalist establishment failed to assess in Kemal Atatürk’s vision of State.

C. Failure to accurately and integrally assess Kemal Atatürk’s vision of Turkey

Speaking about milliyetçilik in the previous unit, I made it clear that Kemal Ataturk, due to his spiritual master Rudolf von Sebottendorf, was at the very antipodes of the racist dimension of Nazism that prevailed in Germany after English Zionists and fake Freemasons usurped Thule Gesellschaft from its founder and forced Rudolf von Sebottendorf to escape to Turkey.

Contrarily to what most people believe or can imagine, racist crypto-Nazis are omnipresent today in the so-called Western European and North American administrations. Their racism brings misfortune to all; this is so because they diffuse fake versions of World History that are filled with racist considerations and falsehood.

Bloodlines do not exist in History; it is a fallacy and a vicious propaganda that causes wars, strives, bloodshed and destruction. Those who diffuse this propaganda do it always on purpose. Kemal Ataturk knew this reality and shaped Turkey on the sound and pertinent concept of ‘supra-national identity founded on land-based communal unity, shared historicity and integrity of cultural heritage’ (milliyetçilik).

This means that Kemal Ataturk viewed modern Turks as the true heirs of many nations, cultures and civilizations, including Ancient Mesopotamia, Caucasus, Anatolia, Balkans, and Central Asia. My good friend, the distinguished professor and academician Erol Manisali, still remembers my extensive analyses and even recently he referred to me (under my former Christian name) in a brilliant article published only last July:

erol-manisali.jpg

Anadolu kültürü “Pers’ten eski Roma’ya, Mezopotamya’dan Asya’ya bir sentezdir: Ben bir Sümer’im, Hitit’im, Doğu Roma’yım, Asya’yım ve Türk’üm”. Yunanlı dostum, 20 dil bilen Prof. Cosmos Megalommatis, “Klasik Uygarlığa Yeni Yaklaşımlar” başlığı altında 1980’li yıllardan beri yaptığı yayınlarda şunu söyler: “Avrupa’nın Roma ve Atina’ya oturttuğu ‘klasik uygarlık’ yanlıştır: Avrupa uygarlığı Mezopotamya’daki 20’den fazla uygarlığın bir sentezidir” tezini savunur.(*)

 

Atatürk’ün “tango”su ve “zeybek”i bu tezin vurucu bir özetidir. “Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyene” özdeyişi de aslında, Anadolu Türkiyesi’nin bir yansımasıdır. Çanakkale’de başlayıp Dumlupınar’da biten ve Lozan’da sonuçlanan emperyalizme karşı savaşta Anadolu insanının (ve kültürünün) binlerce yıldır biriken soluğu vardır“.

The article’s title is Atatürk’te zeybek, tango ve ‘yön’ (24 Temmuz 2018 – 24 July 2018) and the entire text is to be found here:

http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/koseyazisi/1035324/Ataturk_te_zeybek__tango_ve__yon_.html

However, the problem with the Turkish Establishment back in the 1990s was that they did not know what it takes to lead a modern nation which is the true heir of many nations, cultures and civilizations, including Ancient Anatolia, Mesopotamia, Caucasus, Balkans, Russia and Central Asia. They had lost the real sense of History, and they thus could make long and eloquent discourses that did not correspond to the needs of Turkey’s

– educational and academic system

– educational – academic – cultural relations with a great number of states across Asia, Europe and Africa

– international position, and impact on the world

– basic targets of foreign policy

– obligation to outmaneuver other countries’ strategies that were in conflict with Turkey’s identity, international position, and impact on the world.

The above is a very summarized catalogue of Turkey’s academic inadequacies and disorientation. What Turkish professors used to teach at those days as History was a repetition of Western fallacies about the Orient, a dead corpus of facts and info, a boring list of numerous data with no evident connection with the present and the future. At those days, all Turks knew that they were in part the descendants of the Hittites; but not one professor explained to his students and general audience in what this affected them and what possibilities it gave them for the future – let alone how it could impact successfully Turkey’s present geopolitical situation and future aspirations.

Still, Kemal Ataturk’s vision of Turkey, as described in my analysis of the term milliyetçilik, is the epitome of World History, and of the Human Genius, as expressed throughout millennia on specific lands and parts of lands of which the Earth is composed. And this is the advice that I then gave to the Turkish Establishment.

 

III. The Advice that I gave to the Turkish Establishment

1. Not all the lands are equally important in terms of geographical determinism. The ‘holy’ lands matter most, but the lands that are nowadays publicized as ‘holy’ are not necessarily holy.

5.JPG

2. The present shape of the Earth is irrelevant and unimportant, because the antediluvian Earth was very different from what Earth appears to be now; this was part of the now reconstituted Ancient Mesopotamian and Anatolian wisdom, science and knowledge.

6.jpg

3. Mesopotamia and Anatolia constitute a geographical unity that represents the center of the surface of the Earth and the world’s most critical venues of Human History. In other words, History took place here and not elsewhere. Surrounding lands like Iran, Caucasus, Phoenicia, Palestine, Yemen and Arabia are only appendices to the Center of the Earth.

7.jpg

4. In antediluvian and postdiluvian times, the greatest and most genuine achievements of the Mankind in terms of Spirituality, Faith, Myth, Reflection, Identity, Integrity, Wisdom, Contemplation, Invention, and Enterprise were performed in this land.

a.jpg

5. This is the land whereby the most visionary among the humans contemplated on and reflected critical conditions and determinant situations antedating even the Creation of the Universe. This is a supreme, unique trait of Human Intelligence and Spirituality. There is indeed a line of Spirituality that links Enuma Elish, Adapa (Adam), Atrahasis, Sargon of Akkad, the Descent of Ishtar in the Nether World, the Sargonids of Nineveh, Jonah, Jesus, and Prophet Muhammad to the End Times’ rise of the Assyrians, upheaval, and termination of the postdiluvian fall. One can call it the Hand of God. And this Divine Intervention and line of Spirituality was well known to the founder of Modern Turkey – not without implications.

aa.jpg

6. Modern Turkey’s interconnectedness with and inheritance of Sumer through the Ancient Assyrians is reflected in the History of Cappadocia and Northern Mesopotamia that are parts of Turkey’s territory.

Felsrelief_von_Firaktin_Hattusili_III.jpg

7. The geographical unity of Mesopotamia and Anatolia empowered faiths and contemplations, religions and Weltanschauungen, explorers and entrepreneurs to radiate across Asia and Africa through the gradual formation of the land-, desert- and sea-routes of trade between the Earth’s most distant parts. The interchangeability of Silk-, Spice- and Perfume (Incense)- Roads became, thanks to Aramaeans, Turanians, and Yemenites, the way Iranian Mithraism moved from Central Asia to Sudan, to Rome to England, Manichaeism expanded from Atlantic to Pacific, and Buddhism, Nestorianism and Islam spread to China.

4.jpg

8. Human History is History of Land; there is no such thing as History of Sea. The Primordial Ocean of Soft Water as surrounding the Land of Paradise is the epitome of every Eschatology from the Anatolian Ullikummi to John’s Revelation; the salt water seas will cease to exist and therefore any consideration of them is immaterial for our times. Maritime powers live the last moments of their otherwise worthless existence and barbaric activities.

8.jpg

9. In the aftermath of four millennia of human interaction, exploration, inventiveness, adaptability, cultural exchange, and economic enterprise across the geographical lines that link Anatolia – Mesopotamia

a) through Central Asia with China

b) through Iran with India and Indonesia

c) through the Balkans with the Western Asiatic peninsula of Europe,

today’s Turkey is the indispensable central ring in the process of re-establishing the Oriental Celestial Order, Human Unity, and Spiritual Universality. This has nothing to do with the much publicized but trivial globalization. What truly matters is what comes after the short-lived globalization ends.

9.jpg

10. Kemal Ataturk’s emblematic sentence ‘Yurtta Sulh, Cihanda Sulh’ (Peace at Home, Peace in the World) not only reflects the identical interests Turkey has with China and Germany, but also imposes explicit, resolute and precipitated disconnection from and opposition to US, UK, France and NATO.

10.jpg

11. Promoting full interoperability between Ankara and Beijing will help Turkey trigger developments in Iran, Russia and Central Asia in full concordance with the interests of China, and of the New Germany that will rise after the disintegration of the European Union and the implosion of the US and UK. Post-Qajar Iran was never the empire that it had been; either monarchical or ‘theocratic’, it is now about to get decomposed and this development will be essential for Turkey to exploit if not trigger. Similarly, new dynamics that are about to be shaped in the lands controlled by the unraveling Kremlin tyranny have to be taken into consideration in Ankara and duly supported. The sun rises in the same way above Turkey and Yakutia.

1.jpg

12. Exporting Kemal Ataturk’s model to China’s Eastern Turkestan (Sinkiang) will be another result of Ankara’s engagement with The Belt and Road Initiative (One Belt One Road – OBOR) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). It is essential for Turks to let the Chinese understand, as Kemal Ataturk realized before 100 years, that modern political Islamic movements do not represent the Islamic Heritage, the Islamic History, and the Muslims in their quasi-totality; they are an alien fabrication of the now collapsing, Zionist and Apostate Freemasonic Western elites. Islam was part of China’s past and it will be part of China’s future, if Beijing intends to carry out its engagement and to rise as the world’s sole superpower. Re-education of the Chinese Muslims in full promotion of Kemal Ataturk’s standards, principles and practices and in full rejection of Political Islam and Wahhabism is the designated method.

3.jpg

Download the article in Word doc:

Turkey & 21st c. Geopolitics

2.png

Independent Biyyaa Oromoo, and the path toward it

The only natural manner for a historical nation to survive in the modern world is an independent state; this does not however mean that within the borders of a modern state, a nation can always survive. The greatest concern is therefore Identity. Why being independent, if you lose your identity?

1.gif

Existence is not justified without identity. This has always been known to Oromos. Oromoness is above all. Losing identity, a nation loses its birthright to exist, and disappears.

When an invader and an oppressor exterminates a great number of people, this is called physical genocide.

When an alien plunderer and a cruel persecutor attempts to eradicate the foundations of a subjugated nation’s identity, i.e. the nation’s historical continuity, cultural integrity, ethnic purity, religious authenticity, sacramental values, moral distinctiveness, ancestral traditions, linguistic particularity, behavioral uniqueness, and social cohesiveness, this is called spiritual genocide.

Oromos have been exposed to both, physical and spiritual, genocides over the past 170 years. In fact, when we use the term ‘physical genocide’ within the context of the modern world (19th-21st c.), we ascertain that the Oromos have been the first nation to be exposed to physical genocide in terms clearly denoted by the Russian Imperial delegate Alexander Bulatovich who spent few years in East Africa in the late 1890s. See:

The Oromo Genocide Solemnly Confessed by Official Russian Explorer in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia – http://originaloromantic.blogspot.com/2010/07/oromo-genocide-solemnly-confessed-by.html

BIYYAA OROMOO.jpg

However, the criminal colonial nations that bear responsibility for this genocide, namely England, France and Abyssinia (the ruling tribes of Amhara and Tigray), never accepted this reality, although during the 20th c. they used the term for other nations that were part of their own, colonial interests and agendas.

Having to struggle for their national independence and self-determination, today’s Oromos must keep a close eye to situations that prevail among independent nations worldwide.

In today’s world, many independent nations preserved their nominal sovereignty only to lose their identity, following an enormous tsunami of definitely corruptive, utterly devious, viciously inhuman Modernity that was secretively invented, systematically prepared, and overwhelmingly projected onto all nations via methodically unveiled technology.

Thoughtlessly, disputably, and mendaciously, billions of people were disingenuously driven to live in manners that their ancestors would disapprove of and in the process, entire nations lost their

 – historical continuity, as they are not anymore identical to their forefathers

– cultural integrity, as they are all amalgamated via fake trends and lifestyle

– ethnic purity, as they are forced to intercommunal marriages

– religious authenticity, as their religions receded to fake laws or new trends

– sacramental values, as the fake notion of politics desecrated human life

– moral distinctiveness, as Modernity is tantamount to Immorality

– ancestral traditions, as they are shamelessly defamed or inanely ignored

– linguistic particularity, as technical jargons & anglicisms spread worldwide

– behavioral uniqueness, as a cataclysmic mimetism eradicated authenticity, and

– social cohesiveness,  as pervasive forces and secret organizations sprouted.

In fact, most of the nations or fake nations represented in the UN General Assembly have preserved a nominal independence while progressively losing – in various degrees – their identity. These nations cannot and will not survive; unless they react in force, they are dead corpses, dark shadows, and dreadful reminiscences of their past selves.

The homogeneity of a Fake Humanity prevails already from Asia to Africa to America only to drive the mankind to the maelstrom of its extinction, and in this regard, there is nothing more that we could do.

This means that today the Oromos, having lost their independence for ca. 170 years and having preserved their national identity despite (or because!) of an unprecedented, enduring and multifaceted spiritual genocide, are in reality in a more advantageous position than all the nations or fake nations represented in the UN General Assembly.

As a matter of fact, although deprived of national independence, today’s Oromos – ignored by the world, tyrannized by their oppressors, but blessed by Waaqo – have maintained what most of the nominally independent nations have lost.

Few Oromos today can understand that what was thought to be a curse (the loss of national independence) turned out to be a benediction. That’s why few of them know their asymmetrical advantage over the other, the nominally independent nations that lost their identity.

This is even more difficult for today’s Oromo Diaspora to assess. That’s why I utterly advise all Oromo political leaders, heads of organizations, academics, intellectuals, pundits and activists to allow the local Oromo Youth to lead the struggle for National Independence.

I know how difficult it may be and how odd it may sound – particularly if we take into consideration the prerogatives set by the Gadaa system – and I admit that it will take a great deal of courage for leaders of the Oromo Diaspora to be convinced that the Oromo youngsters, who do not know the world, can bring forth the ultimate success and achieve the liberation of Occupied Biyya Oromoo. But there is no alternative to this.

One does not need to know the world in order to liberate Biyya Oromoo. For this task, one needs to be a culturally integral Oromo, a morally genuine Oromo, and a behaviorally unaltered Oromo. There are millions of Oromos who lead the path to Independent Biyya Oromoo.

My statement does undermine the Oromo Diaspora; but Oromo intellectuals and activists, who spent many years abroad, without being less Oromos (on the contrary), may have been confused by the technological development, the economic expansion, the political power, and the military dexterity of the countries where they live in. And this can damage the struggle for National Independence.

There is no need for Biyya Oromoo to become independent so that the Oromos lose their identity. There is no need for an Independent Biyyaa Oromoo that would be a mixture of Malaysia and Peru, a simulacrum of Sri Lanka and Tunisia, and a reminiscence of Japan and Mexico.

An Independent Biyyaa Oromoo must be what the last Oromo kingdoms were, because those kingdoms stood for values that were diametrically opposed to the evil norms, the inhuman policies, and the Satanic practices of England, France and America – and for that reason the English and the French helped the barbaric Amhara and Tigray to suppress and eliminate the Oromo kingdoms, and later the Americans replaced the English and the French in the support extended to the tribal Abyssinian gangsters.

The Oromo values are not for the Modern World, but they represent Humanity in its best and eternal authenticity; the Modern World, after eliminating the Oromo kingdoms, so that there is no challenge to the Western depravity, expanded from the West to the other continents, contaminating, eroding and corrupting all nations.

Tomorrow, an Independent Biyyaa Oromoo will not be a modern state, because Modernity is at the diabolical antipodes of the Oromo Identity. There is no need for technology, construction, malls, football stadiums, skyscrapers and 5* hotels in an Independent Biyyaa Oromoo.

Oromos can only reconstitute the ideal country that they had before 200 years in the form of kingdoms living in honor, honesty, and humanity within the nature. Only the young Oromos, who never traveled abroad, have in their hearts and in their minds intact the remembrance of the great days of the Oromo kingdoms, and the memory of the wonderful life that those kingdoms secured for all Oromos.

For the above reasons, Oromo national sovereignty will come as a challenge to the rest of the world. Because this is so, not one nation will ever come to support the Oromos’ struggle for National Independence. This is a real favor. What happened to nations that became ‘independent’ with the evil ‘support’ of the Satanic nations of the West?

Not far from Biyyaa Oromoo live the Nuer and the Dinka who are now bound to internal strife, fight and killing within the borders of the fake state of South Sudan. This is the perfect example of Western perversion and malignancy. Oromos must know that the Western nations and diplomacies will never act otherwise, and for this reason, all Oromo political leaders must stop contacting any representative of any Western political establishment – and if contacted, they must decline the offer.

The only possibly ‘favorable’ offers coming from the West will be either an Oromo administration within the borders of present Abyssinia (also known as Fake Ethiopia) – which would be the most un-Oromo and anti-Oromo environment – or an ‘independent’ Kush whereby Oromos will be forced to affront and compete with the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Kaffas and other nations in a restless milieu useful for Western, illegal arm sales.

 

I am glad that today’s Afar, Gambella, Shekacho, Tatek, Benishangul, Ogaden, Sidama and Oromo leadership demonstrates a remarkable clarity of purpose. Joining forces and relying on their own, oppressed and persecuted nations, they can launch many coordinated efforts that will bring down the world’s most criminal, most tyrannical, and most inhuman state, i.e. the colonial empire of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).

All Cushitic and Nilo-Saharan nations of Abyssinia must make of their identity preservation the no 1 reason of their struggle for national independence and they must demand from the world’s community nothing less than what European nations accepted and implemented in Europe: the ‘one nation one state’ principle.

If small nations like Montenegro, Estonia, Kosovo, Latvia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Albania and Lithuania (all under 3 million people each) can be accepted as independent nations in the UN, all the subjugated nations of today’s Abyssinia have the right to statehood and national sovereignty.

I herewith reproduce the press release – condemnation issued by the Ethiopian Political Organisations of the All-Inclusive London Conference (EPOAILC) on the occasion of the Moyale killings of innocent civilians by the TPLF regime (20 March 2018) and the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of Political Organizations participated on All-Inclusive Conference Initiated by Peoples Alliance for Freedom and Democracy (PAFD) conducted in London between February 24 and 25, 2018.

 

Stand United to Bring About Lasting Genuine Change in Ethiopia!

https://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/English/Press_Release/Ethiopian%20Political%20Oganization.htm

We, Ethiopian Political Organisations of the All-Inclusive London Conference (EPOAILC) – February 2018, strongly condemn the Moyale killings of innocent civilians by the TPLF regime. This unprovoked/ wanton and fascistic killings were occurred on unarmed civilians in the heart of the town of Shewaber, in Moyale (Oromia region), whilst people were doing their daily routines.  The TPLF army went on a shooting spree and killed children, school teachers and women. Despite the army blaming false intelligence for its actions, the evidence from the administration of the Oromia Region and eyewitness shows that some of the victims were made to kneel down and shot in the head. Regardless of the requests of local people and the judiciary’s request, there have been no inquiry or judicial process initiated following the killings. On the contrary, the Oromia Judicial administration head, Mr. Taye Dendea, was arrested by the military and taken away after he openly condemned the killings and demanded the perpetrators to be brought to justice. In the wake of these killings, about 50,000 people have fled and continue to flee to the nearby Kenyan town across the border for safety.

These crimes happened in the wake of the illegitimate State of Emergency that was declared for the second time by the regime on 16 February to reverse the loss of grip on power in recent months due to the mass protests that rocked the country. The regime has found it difficult to believe that the change driven by protesting young people  the Qeerroos, the Fanos, the Zerma’s, the nebros and the likes, is irreversible and that this is the beginning of the end of its corrupt and racist rule. Despite the harsh response from the regime, the peoples’ protests demand for change is tenacious struggle to date that is increasingly driving the country into deeper crisis.

The TPLF divide and rule policy has costed our nation many lives and the dislocation of over one million Oromo people, tens of thousands of Somalis and other nations and nationalities in Ethiopia. There are strong indications that the regime still intends to open rift among nations and nationalities by arming and pitting one community against another. We warn the peoples of Ethiopia and political activists to expect these artificial conflicts in the near future and act on it by exposing these intrigues of the regime and strengthen our unity and fraternity.

Now, the country has come to a standstill. Over two years/ three years of sustained and peaceful mass protests and boycotts of the people for fundamental change, especially in central and South Ethiopia, including areas surrounding  the capital Addis Ababa/ Finfinne have been  excessive but have brought closer to the end of the dark days of oppression. similarly, areas in the north of Ethiopia- Gonder and Gojjam and some parts of Wollo are fighting for their freedom and democracy. Most cities and towns especially in the Oromo and Amhara regions have been completely blacked out, deprived of internet and other means of communication so that the protesters would find it difficult to communicate with each other as well as to blind the world from knowing what is going on in those regions. In the current TPLF enclave of Southern Ethiopia, political oppositions and youth group seeking for change are rounded up and jailed and tortured but this has not been reported due to remoteness of the areas and lack of organised campaign group.

Therefore, in all over Ethiopia, many people are being jailed by the Command Post including local government officials for refusing to hand over government funds, for resisting undue intervention by the Command Post in administrative matters as well as for exposing the heinous crime being committed by the regime’s infamous Agazi forces.

Therefore, we, Ethiopian Political Organisations of the All-Inclusive London Conference call upon:

The people of Ethiopia especially the young who are taking the toll of the burden in this struggle, to continue to resist this evil regime by working together and allowing no divide amongst themselves.

 All nations, nationalities and peoples of Ethiopia to stick together as brothers and sisters of one nation and not allow the evil regime to use our differences as instruments to instigate war against each other.

The regime’s armed forces and the security apparatus to refuse to shoot their own people and stand for justice with the people of Ethiopia to do away with this tyrannical rule. Any more killing will only worsen the situation for you as there soon will come a time when you will be called upon to be accountable.

The international community, including the United Nations, The Unites states of America, Europe, China and Russia to put pressure on the regime to stop all extrajudicial killings, imprisonment and torture of all dissidents and others and accept genuine transfer of power to a transitional government.

The African Union, as having special relationship with African nations, to do its best in not only saving a member nation from falling apart, but also in saving the seat of the Africa Union.

All political organisations and other stakeholders fighting against the TPLF led regime to stand shoulder to shoulder with us in our fight for individual and collective rights, the rule of law and justice, freedom and unity in Ethiopia. Since the challenges we face are huge and the gravity of the problems unfathomable, we call upon you to make a united stand against the tyrannical regime.

Stand united against the TPLF!

Victory for the People of Ethiopia!

20 March 2018

Members of Ethiopian Political Organisations of the All-Inclusive London Conference (EPOAILC)

Afar Liberation Front Party (ALFP)

Gambella  Nilotes United Movement (GNUM)

Gambella Regional Movement (GRM)

Oromo Parliamentarian council (OPC)

Shekacho People’s Movement for Democracy and Socal Justice (SPMDSJ)

Tatek Movement for Freedom, Democracy and Unity of Ethiopia (Tatek Ethiopia )

People’s Alliance For Freedom and Democracy (PAFD)

Benishangul People’s Liberation Movement (BPLM)

Gambella Peoples Liberation Movement (GPLM)

Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF)

Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)

Sidama National Liberation Front (SNLF)

 

 

Memorandum of Understanding of Political Organizations Participated PAFD Conference

https://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/English/Press_Release/Memorandam%20MoU.htm

March 7, 2018

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of Political Organizations participated on All-Inclusive Conference Initiated by Peoples Alliance for Freedom and Democracy (PAFD) conducted in London between February 24 and 25, 2018

66.jpg

This Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) sets for the terms and understanding between political forces in Ethiopia who took part and in principle agreed to work together during all-inclusive International Conference conducted in London between February 24 and 25, 2018.

 

Background

The Peoples’ Alliance for Freedom and Democracy (PAFD) had initiated and organised an ‘International conference on a current crisis in Ethiopia to explore realistic alternatives’ in London, UK between February 24 and 25, 2018. After a critical consideration and deliberation of the current dreadful situation in Ethiopia, the participants unanimously committed to set a MoU to strategize peaceful transition that would be acceptable by all peoples in Ethiopia. Therefore, we the delegates of various political organisations observed and pronounced the following:

  1. Depth of Current situations in Ethiopia-The depth and magnitude of the current problems and dire situation facing Ethiopia demand from us to narrow our differences and confidently work together towards an all- inclusive, realistic and lasting solution.

  1. Gross violations of Human Rights- The TPLF/EPRDF’s reign has been marred by gross violations of all sorts of individual and collective rights of peoples in Ethiopia. The regime went to the extent of large- scale violation of human rights (genocide) which is equivalent to crime of violence against humanity. Through its politically motivated and extremely weak judiciary system, the regime harasses and intimidates opposition leaders and their members, journalists and the public at large.

  1. Delusion of the democratization process in Ethiopia-The world’s understanding of the democratisation process in Ethiopia is delusional. The regime was erroneously seen as ‘democratic government’ despite the fact that its brutality and dictatorial nature was revealed in several occasions since it came to power. The endorsements of elections of 1995, 2000 and 2005 by external players validated the regime’s electoral authoritarianism. However, the fake democracy was left naked when the regime declared its landslide bogus victory with 99.6 % during 2010 and 100 % during 2015 elections respectively. The Oromia-wide anti-government protest culminated just months after the regime declared of its last victory and progressed throughout Ethiopia to date wholly disproving the regime’s claims. The TPLF/EPRDF has totally restricted political space and repeatedly employed draconian legislations to legitimise its crack down on political opponents, civic society organizations, and independent media utterly crippling the process of democratization in Ethiopia.

  1. Artificial conflicts among peoples as a means of Governance-the EPRDF employs divide and conquer governance policy by instigating chains of artificially orchestrated conflicts between peacefully coexisting nations and peoples in Ethiopia. Moreover, the regime went to the extent of recruiting, training, and arming militias of one ethnic group to wage war on its neighbours and maim unarmed civilians in various regions. The recent example is TPLF instigated conflict between Somali Ogaden and Oromos that cost the lives of hundreds of civilians on both sides and displaced about a million people from their homes and properties. Such maliciously masterminded conflicts by TPLF/EPRDF are rampaging the entire country as we speak.

  1. Reckless land grab and displacements of peoples-The huge land grab to lease to rich countries and wealthy individuals, who often export their produces to their own respective countries, whilst nearly 8 million people exposed to famine. This clearly indicates that, the regime has no consideration and accountability to the Ethiopia people, rather only cares for its corrupt officials and defends its interests at the expense of the majority.

  1. Lack of Environmental protection- The environmental cost of leasing out land to foreign investors, without appropriate frame on environmental protection, shows the regime’s recklessness. Ample evidences indicate that, there are countless numbers of natural species going extinct since the TPLF/EPRDF assumed power in 1991. Contamination of soil and water emanating from the reckless use of dangerous chemicals on the factories; careless use of pesticides by the investors, and deliberate burning of vast forests with hundreds of indigenous trees by TPLF/EPRDF agents are leaving rural communities and their animals at serious health risk.

  1. Continuous military response to peoples’ peaceful quests-The TPLF/EPRDF regime has increasingly resorted to responding to the peaceful quests of peoples for freedom and democracy with military solutions. It had declared a state of emergency (SoE) in October 2016 and series of SoEs since then and mounted massive military operations in various regions, using various excuses to massacre unarmed civilians, concomitantly burning their villages in many parts of the country on ongoing basis.

  1. Monopolising political and economic power by TPLF-In the current one-party political authoritarianism, the political and economic powers are intertwined and monopolised by the regime. TPLF- owned enterprises, endowment funds, army and security apparatuses are not protecting the people but are loyal to TPLF/EPRDF regime and corrupted officials. The TPLF owned ‘Endowment Fund for Rehabilitation of Tigray (EFFORT)’, the largest company in Africa, has monopolised all business from little to large; crippled private enterprises and exploited the entire country.

  1. The regime’s inability to withstand popular revolution- The regime is unable to endure the non-violent and peaceful protests that erupted primarily in Oromia followed by the second largest nation, the Amhara and extended to other regions shaking the regime. Currently, Ethiopia is a country of uncertainty where social and political tension dictates all aspects of peoples’ life. These affect not only Ethiopia but also other nations of the horn of Africa.

  1. Widespread instability in the country– It is recognized that the democratic process initiated in 1991 in Ethiopia has failed to advance to lasting peace and stability. The instability would not only become cataclysmic to Ethiopia, but may also engulf the horn of Africa. Resolving inter-state and intra-state political tensions on time; promoting democracy and equality and robust policy on reducing poverty and creating favourable conditions for economic prosperity will be critical for region’s stability and defeating terrorism in the region.

 

Purpose

This MoU stressed the severity of the situation in Ethiopia and established workable framework for resolving the current crises in unison sooner than later. The key objectives of the conference were bringing together all opposition groups of Ethiopia irrespective of their political and ideological differences and openly discuss on dire situation to identify the underlying causes for unfolding tragedies in Ethiopia and devise a realistic strategy to remove the cause and devise lasting peace and stability in the country.

 

Planned Activities

This conference set in motion a process of genuine democratization to resolve the current crisis in Ethiopia through the following mechanisms and activities:

  1. Unconditionally work together with determination and dedication during the pre and post TPLF/EPRDF regime.

  1. Urge the Ethiopian peoples and political forces within the country and in the Diaspora to actively participate in peacefully resolving the current crisis in Ethiopia.

  1. Conduct a similar all-inclusive National Conference on peace and democracy within the shortest time scale possible.

  1. Call upon all friends of the peoples of Ethiopia and the international community to support this initiative to bring about lasting peace by resolving outstanding political issues and enduring and genuine democracy to the country.

  1. Prepare a comprehensive all-inclusive roadmap for a Transitional arrangement- based on negotiations and agreement reached upon with all political forces of Ethiopia during its forthcoming all-inclusive international conference/s.

  1. Facilitate all-inclusive transitional Conference in Ethiopia and work in unison a programme of transition and establish an all-inclusive transitional post-TPLF/EPRDF government.

  1. Unconditionally respect and uphold all fundamental human rights including individual, collective and the rights to self-determination.

  1. Build the necessary institutions for democratic transition including non-partisan electoral board.

  1. Honour and respect the souls of all peoples murdered by the TPLF/EPRDF’s barbaric regime in the past 27 years in Ethiopia whilst seeking justice.

  1. Create an independent truth and reconciliation commission in Ethiopia.

  1. Create a non-discriminatory legislative framework against nations and peoples in Ethiopia that is based on categories such as their numbers, identity, culture, religion, gender, and skin colour.

The conference has established a Coordinating Committee and its Executive comprising high level representatives from the participating political forces to liaise and follow-up the process of convening the next conference/s and establishing the support of the peoples in Ethiopia and the international community.

The political forces Ethiopia that participated in this conference call on all other Ethiopian political organisations, stakeholders and civil organisation both at home and abroad to set aside minor differences and unite against the TPLF regime; support the struggle at home, work to create an all-inclusive transitional government which will facilitates the creation of non-partisan institutions that can ultimately establish a democratic arrangement in Ethiopia.

Finally, the conference participants express their profound appreciation and gratitude to PAFD for initiating, coordinating and delivering this international conference thereby enabling us all to come together and agree to work together to find a proper cure for the ongoing malignancy in the country. We also fully endorse and appreciate the USA’s legislative body for crafting HR128 on behalf of the peoples of Ethiopia.

 

Duration

This MOU shall be effective as of 25th February 2018 and will remain in effect until amended or repealed through a consensus of the organization representatives in the Co-coordinating committee and it may be made at any regular meeting, or at special meeting called for this purpose, provided by a written notice of the chairman of the intended Organization for a change. The intention of the meeting and proposed amendments are conveyed to all member organizations two weeks in advance through the Chairperson of Co-coordinating/Executive Committee.

 

List of organizations

 

Name of the organization            Representative

 

Name                                          Signature

  1. Afar Liberation Front Party (ALFP) : Mr Ahmed Humed

  2. Gambella Nilotes United Movement (GNUM) : Mr. Ojulu Cham

  3. Oromo Parliamentarian council (OPC): Dr. Getachew Jigi

  4. Shekacho People’s Movement for Democracy and Social Justice (SPMDSJ) Dr. Achame Shana

  5. Tatek Movement for Freedom, Democracy and Unity of Ethiopia (Tatek Ethiopia): Mr. Yosias Tadesse Negash

  6. People’s Alliance For Freedom and Democracy (PAFD): Dr.Shigut Geleta

  7. Benishangul People’s Liberation Movement (BPLM): Mr. Mohammed Ahmed

  8. Gambella Peoples Liberation Movement (GPLM): Mr. Oman Goran

  9. Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) Mr. Hassan Moalin

  10. Oromo Liberation Front (OLF): Mr. Oda Xase

  11. Sidama National Liberation Front (SNLF) Mr. Danboba Natie

The International Conference in the Current Crisis in Ethiopia, to explore a Realistic Alternatives.

The End of Deliberation!

Download this article in Word doc:

Independent Biyyaa Oromoo

 

Zionist – Freemasonic – Jesuit Agendas in Conflict or Superposition: End Times’ Sequence & Trajectories

Shrewd commentators, who oppose present world’s negative developments and nature, find* that, within the context of divided Christianity, “healing the schism would be great”, and that there are “forces trying to bring the two churches together” (Catholic & Orthodox).

 

However, they also observe that, on the other hand, other projects, like the notorious, Kalergi plan and the ongoing Islamist immigration, truly gain momentum. Finding the two trends opposite to one another, they ask “why would Rome lay down to this?”.

 

Christian Reunification, Kalergi Plan, Mass Immigration, Europe’s Islamization – Zionists, Freemasons, Jesuits

 

The present article explains why the two, seemingly opposite, spirals and dynamics correspond to either different agendas or different agendas’ chapters and serve diverse trajectories, without truly being opposite to one another.

 

Indeed, it makes no sense for the European Christian churches (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox) to reunite together, if one accepts to be overridden by the Islamization process. However, at this point, there are at work different projects and trajectories that are promoted by opposite forces, without however being frontally opposite to one another.

 

I. Anti-Messianic, Anti-Eschatological Freemasons: the Apostate Lodge

 

You know that the ‘elite’ is not one, but divided into Jesuits, Freemasons, and Zionists and each group has its centuries-old (or rather millennia-long) agenda. In addition, there are internal factions, which also pursue divergent agendas; in other words, these internal splits and factions do not exist for any other reason except agenda differentiation.

 

The main forces involved and their different agendas reveal automatically the existence of diverse eschatological/messianic plans or the absence / rejection thereof. (The latter is also to be reckoned with.)

 

The atheistic lodge Grand Orient de France (this is the bulk of the Scottish / French rite in France: it controls Le Droit Humain lodges and it is engaged in fierce fighting against the Grande Loge Nationale Francaise, which is an English rite outfit in France) not only does not promote eschatological / messianic plans, but also opposes all existing ones, be they Freemasonic, Jesuit or Zionist of origin/nature.

 

II. Schism within Ashkenazi, pseudo-Jewish, Khazarian Zionism

 

When I was in Israel (1984-1985) during my postgraduate studies (Egyptology / Assyriology), I came upon a Zionist branch that was also anti-eschatological and anti-messianic. What did they teach / propagate in their seminars? That the Messiah had already come, that ‘he’ is Eretz (the state of) Israel, and that we therefore live in the messianic times, when the Messiah (Israel) will progressively outshine the rest of the world (the Goyim).

 

So, it is only normal for that Zionist branch to cooperate with Grand Orient de France and with other similar forces (within the Zionist universe and outside of it) in order to promote stability and permanence of the Post WW II world. (By the way, the Clintons belong to this faction, contrarily to Netanyahu.)

 

The aforementioned two cases are only examples.

 

The Greater Israel plan is then not necessarily supported by all Zionist groups, because any plan linked to a personal Messiah would be rejected by the Zionists who identify the Messiah with the state of Israel itself.

 

However, I would say that today the mainstream Zionist world backs the Greater Israel plan; they associate a person with it; they prepare the erection of the Third Temple; some even say in public that they have identified who the future King of Israel is. Few boast having met him in person! And others try to conceal that they have truly come face to face with that atrocious creature. This Zionist plan entails various global developments and the rise of a sizeable Israel (from Euphrates to the Nile) to global prominence.

 

Before explaining what this can eventually mean, I would say that opposite eschatological / messianic plans (those of the Freemasons, of the Jesuits, and eventually of others) may

a. either be in direct opposition with the aforementioned (‘mainstream’) Zionist plan

b. or move on different trajectories that follow different time perspectives (what we would define as ‘short-run’, ‘mid-run’, long-run’).

 

This means that the force that promotes a long-run plan can eventually, under some conditions, and within some limits, may consent to a short-term plan, even if it from the first sight looks extremely opposite to the long-run plan. They may even use it – and this, I believe, is the true nature of the present Jesuit-Zionist alliance; that’s why Francis I avoids criticizing homosexuality, etc., etc., etc. These are minor and trivial points, if compared to the foremost geopolitical-eschatological plans of the Jesuit Order.

 

III. Each eschatological/messianic agenda involves also a different Messiah

 

Most people believe that ‘the elite’ wants to prepare the necessary conditions for their (fake) Messiah/Christ, who will be the long awaited Antichrist. This is very wrong; in fact, there will be many false Christs (pseudo-Christs) and only the last and more powerful one will be the Antichrist (the one mentioned in the Book of Revelation, and in Daniel). This is also consistent with Jesus’ prophecy or description of End times’ stages, namely the statement that ‘many’ will come pretending they are the Christ/Messiah.

 

I don’t believe that only Zionists, Freemasons and Jesuits will come up with their Messiahs, each of them with a different guy. There will be more than just three pseudo-Christs. There will be an Orthodox Russian Christ (at least there is a plan providing for him, elaborated among some independent circles in Russia); there will be at least two Mahdis (a Shia and a Sunni); there will be a Parsist Shosyant, and many other religions’ or sects’ expected messianic figures will appear too. This makes sense, and it only reconfirms Jesus’ words that “nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom” (Mark 13:8 New International Version – NIV).

 

{Key note: I never use KJV by the way – I did crosscheck it with the Greek Septuagint and the Latin Vulgata texts in hundreds of excerpts, and in most of the cases, the meaning of the text was terribly altered to be evidently adapted to Freemasonic concepts. KJV is an untrustworthy forgery and a theological fornication.}

 

The below interpretational diagrams are all wrong and simplistic:

  1. the Zionist Messiah is the Antichrist
  2. the Islamist Mahdi is the Antichrist

(actually no Muslim will believe a Mahdi without a re-appearing Islamic Prophet Jesus, so in that case, one has to expect a tandem or to see fake persons impersonating the roles ascribed to Mahdi and to Jesus as Islamic Prophet)

  1. the Zionist Messiah will eliminate the Islamist Mahdi
  2. the Islamist Mahdi will prevail over the Zionist Messiah

 

IV. A reminiscence of the end times of the Roman Res Publica

 

I believe that, in several successive ‘stages’ of 3.5 or 7 years duration (and this depends on what one considers as ‘stage’), three major circles will be completed.

 

I feel that these circles will be a sort of reminiscence of (or will have some analogy with) the last century of Roman Res Publica, which led to Imperium: Sulla-Cinna-Marius / Crassus-Pompey-Caesar / Marc Antony-Lepidus-Octavian Augustus. The three circles will be as follows.

 

V. Zionist Agenda & the Khazarian Greater Israel

 

Greater IsraelFor this purpose, mainstream Zionists need to ensure:

 

1. the pulverization of several surrounding Middle Eastern states (Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia) by different means, military, socio-political, geotechnical engineering (Egypt can entirely disappear with the quasi-totality of its population within few hours, if a 9.4 Richter earthquake takes place in Aswan and brings down the High Dam).

 

((By the way, the Amhara/Tigray Abyssinians, who control the vast colonial state of ‘Ethiopia’ with numerous subjugated nations that strive for national independence, and who are the allies of the Israeli Khazarian Zionists, have a seven centuries old ‘prophecy’, which became known to Westerners in the late 18th century; according to this ‘vision’, their state at the End Times would share borders – dividing Egypt – with a Jewish state named ‘Israel’ and located in Palestine. When this was published, there was no Zionist Congress!))

 

2. the collapse of Europe – and here fits the Kalergi plan

 

3. the first, small, ‘contained’ nuclear war between Russia and America that will destroy northern parts of European Russia and America’s East Coast

 

Jesuits accept most of this plan, but Freemasons oppose it in various ways. So, Freemasonic endeavors in opposition to the Zionist agenda may involve the following:

 

1. various defense lines against terrorists in Syria & Iraq; support of Iran (Freemasons have infiltrated extensively the Ayatullah regime)

 

2. the re-emergence of European totalitarianism, spirituality, and imperium

 

3. the preparations for the re-establishment of the US as a genuine republican state (as conceived by the Founding Fathers) in a small part of today’s US territory, mainly in the mountainous parts of the Middle West.

 

For Greater Israel to be truly a global power, there have to take place two different types of development:

a. Israel must expand territorially while major countries of the region have to disappear

and

b. Europe, Russia and America have to be pulled into an abysmal maelstrom of destruction, contraction, and insignificance

 

It seems there are two diverse options for Russia’s & America’s contraction, one being the aforementioned, ‘contained’ nuclear war, and the other involving

 

i. extraordinary natural disasters occurring in both, the eastern and the western extremities of the US and

 

ii. ‘color revolution’ against Kremlin.

 

In any case, great importance is given so that the area around Samara, Astrakhan, and the northern shores of the Caspian Sea is always protected.

 

The reason for this is that the local population in that region is not Russian, truly speaking, but Khazarian; there lies the epicenter of the Zionist Khazarian conspiracy.

 

Naive commentators, who express doubts about the veracity of the Greater Israel agenda, ask how Israel with its present, limited population can occupy vast lands of Syria, Iraq, Jordan, NW Saudi Arabia, and Egypt that are today inhabited by more than 100 million people!

 

Those commentators don’t know that a second ‘aliyah’ can take place (like that of the year 1945-1948) and 15-20 million ‘hidden’ ‘Jews’ (in reality: Khazarians presently impersonating Russians) can move to live in the Saudi Red Sea coast north of Jeddah, in the Egyptian Red Sea coast, in Sinai and in the Syrian desert. To support this enormous movement, the vast know-how currently acquired in the Zionist Emirates (UAE) will be transferred to the said territories in order to turn the desert into a green land.

 

As per the terms of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance, the Catholic Church can transfer the Holy See to Jerusalem, if (or when) Rome, Italy and Europe collapse in anarchy, Euro-Islamist wars (I don’t call them civil wars, because Islamist immigrants are alien elements in Europe), and total chaos. This perspective is viewed as inevitable by the Jesuits – and actually by all. And by evidently contributing to Europe’s decomposition, the Jesuits only demonstrate their solidarity with the Zionists, whom they surely cheat superbly as regards the final stages of the Jesuit agenda.

 

So, the plan to unite all churches has a global appeal, whereas local level socio-economic-political-cultural-spiritual power across Europe seems to be of little interest for the Jesuits. This is not strange:

 

first, their main focus is elsewhere, and

 

second, the Jesuits know that, after Europe’s descent to disorder and chaos, the power that will rise will be Freemasonic or if you prefer Nordic-Germanic, Gnostic, Hermetic, Wagnerian, Arian (the early Christian heresy) or ‘pagan’.

 

Use whatever word you want, but it will be an anti-Catholic, anti-Orthodox, anti-Jesuit Christianity with references to Merovingian bloodline and other extra-Christian literature.

 

VI. The Rise of the New Roman (European) Empire

 

For this purpose, Freemasons need to ensure:

 

1. A low degree destruction in the Middle East, which will also involve the following:

– preservation of Iran,

– creation of ‘Kurdistan’ on only Iraqi, Syrian and Turkish territories,

– formation of a Sunni central Iraqi state,

– emergence of a Shia state in South Iraq and the NE confines of Saudi Arabia (Dammam), and

– expansion of Jordan across NW quarter of Saudi Arabia

 

2. a. the total destruction of all democratic concepts and ideas in Europe, the formation of military groups that, after the fight against and the elimination of the Islamists, will rise to absolute power and impose a Freemasonic, pseudo-Christian, European Imperial state that will look closer to Mithraic Iranian Arsacid Empire, to Gnostic-Hermetic Christianity, and to Hyperborean cults and traditions.

 

2. b. During the forthcoming chaos across Europe, the Freemasons will spearhead the destruction of Rome and the conversion of most of the Christian churches in Western, Central and Northern Europe into pseudo-Christian Freemasonic temples. So, at that stage, the tactical interests of the Freemasons and the Zionists will converge again.

 

Another factor related to the destruction of Rome, which can also explain why the Jesuits seem indifferent to this forthcoming event, is the perplex phenomenon of the Fatima apocalyptic visions (six apparitions from 13th May to 13th October 1917) and the associated Miracle of Sun. In spite of the terrible measures taken to prevent the diffusion of the truth and despite the enormous volumes of lies spread on this subject by the official Catholic Church in order to confuse and disorient every concerned explorer, many came to know that the Fatima apocalyptic visions do actually concern the end of the Catholic Church as we have known it until now.

 

So, I conclude that the Jesuits realized (particularly after the end of WW II) that the overall sociopolitical and cultural developments across Europe would make Traditional Catholic and Protestant Christianity irrevocably unsustainable in Rome, Italy & Europe, and they therefore shaped their End Times plans accordingly.

 

3. the decadence of Russia (options of ‘color revolution’ or other type of turmoil are under discussion, but not the ‘contained’ nuclear war option) and the implosion of the US (following economic collapse rather than natural disaster, although Freemasons too seem to believe that some type of East Coast natural disaster is inevitable). Following the collapse of central authority (or the submersion of Washington D.C. or the destruction caused by the limited and ‘contained’ nuclear war), the different parts of the elite will live in underground cities or secluded territories. Then, vast lands of today’s American territory will plunge in chaos and they will be ruled by local thugs and gangsters. However, some form of republican state with public order and discipline will emerge in the mountainous parts of the American Middle West.

 

The New Roman-European Empire will be a totalitarian state compared to which Hitler’s Germany would look like a liberal-anarchical spot. To its citizens, it will be a very happy realm, because practically speaking the outright majority of the indigenous European population, previously outraged because of the Islamists’ unprecedented barbarism, will support the anti-Islamist and anti-Jewish resistance, struggle, and victory of the brave European fighters.

 

The end result will be that they will get rid of all troubles, because the great warriors will exterminate all Islamists, Jews (Sephardic or Ashkenazi Khazarians), leftists, homosexuals, liberal-socialists, and other dissident elements. To imagine how terrible the next European war will be, one must consider approximately 50 million people dead from the borders of Russia to the Atlantic in a period of 3-4 years; some cities will surely look worse than Syria’s Aleppo.

 

However, this shocking situation will bring forth splendid results: materialism, consumerism, hedonism and pacifism will have disappeared – along with humanism. The era that started with Copernicus will have ended in Europe. The imperial rise will be very fast, because spiritual powers, techniques, and endeavors will be pursued, and demonic hierarchies will highly contribute to the restoration of the Anti-(Pseudo-)Christian order and authority. A new technology will appear that will be spiritual rather than material of nature. Europe will then believe in  forms of Mithraism, Gnostic Christianity, and Arianism that were thought to have been irreversibly uprooted back in the 4th century.

 

The rise of the European Empire will be simultaneous with the fall of Greater Israel and the final disarray of the Muslim World from Mauritania to India. With America’s, Russia’s, India’s, and Israel’s power decreasing, the purified European Empire will be a meteoric phenomenon and the leader of the struggle against the Islamist immigrants and the erratic Jews will be catapulted to absolute power. This person will be very different from the common, materialistic leaders and fake Messiahs of the Zionists and the Muslims.

 

Europe’s power will spread across Africa, Latin America, and large parts of Asia. Islam will be abolished, and for some time it will look as if it totally disappeared. Israel will disintegrate, and a peace will be imposed among local populations of different backgrounds as the only means to survive; the real Third Temple will be built then, because the earlier built Zionist edifice will be a fake replica. The Third Temple will be indeed Satan’s temple par excellence. The European Emperor will first be called divine (in imitation of Ancient Roman titulary) and then worshipped as god. He will be the Final False Christ, the ‘Antichrist’.

 

This will be an era of major natural disasters and several parts of the Earth will disappear following catastrophic earthquakes, enormous tsunamis, and calamitous sidereal phenomena. It will also be a time a nefarious diseases rapidly spread across vast territories and with many hundreds of millions of dead (“He will destroy many in a time of peace”). The Zionists will have almost disappeared, but this will not be the same for the Jesuits.

 

It goes without saying that Official Christianity either Roman Catholic or Eastern Roman Orthodox will be persecuted and uprooted as Satanic heresy across the European Empire.

999.jpg

VII. Jesuit Christianity and its Survival at the times of the European Empire

 

Where will the main center of the Jesuits be located at those days? In the countries toward which their focus has already shifted, but the world’s media -deliberately or due to oversight- ignore this remarkable change.

 

In fact, the brief and straight answer to the original question (as expressed in the second paragraph of this article) is this:

After the end of WW II, the Jesuits have concluded that

a. Europe is definitely rotten

b. Christianity in Europe is irreversibly dead

c. their power in Europe will never ever rise again

d. Europe will be controlled either by Freemasons or Zionists to its end

e. it makes therefore no sense to Jesuits to oppose the Zionist agenda in Europe, since even if they achieve to avert it, their power will not increase, and at the end the Anti-Christian Freemasons will prevail.

f. at the present moment, because of the aforementioned, and despite the Freemasonic interest in setting up an immense empire headquartered somewhere in Central-Northern Europe, it looks like all three major secret societies, Freemasonry, Societas Jesu, and the Zionist Khazarians, want to see the present European structure destroyed – each for different reasons.

 

(((This does not mean that their puppets – Freemason Holland, Zionist Sarkozy, Jesuit Fillon, Jesuits Anthony Blair and Theresa May, Freemasons Gordon Brown & David Cameron, Freemasons Francois Mitterrand, Helmut Kohl, and Jacques Chirac, Jesuit Angela Merkel, and others – want to truly and consciously destroy their homeland, as many people may imagine mistakenly. All the statesmen and politicians, who belong to today’s European political microcosm, believe that they contribute to the improvement of the socioeconomic conditions and to the elimination of the major problems. This is the result a. of the nature of our world, b. of the overwhelming deception that applies across the board and at all levels, and c. of the function of the three secret and hierarchical societies to which all these persons belong. The initiation to another, higher degree always means partly rejection of earlier beliefs, assumptions and understandings; or to put it otherwise, these secret societies’ superior members always keep the lower members misinformed or uninformed.)))

 

g. consequently, the Jesuits – already before many decades – knew that they had to put all their stakes on one (or more) strong, ancient, coherent, yet politically deceived and disoriented nation that had not yet been Christened. You certainly understand immediately that I mean China.

 

Today, in South Korea, all Christian denominations total around 30-35% among the indigenous people. In Japan, a great part of folk Shinto lean to various branches of Christianity. The same occurs in Taiwan where many non-religious people turn to different Christian churches. More importantly, in China, Buddhists total 18%, Christians are around 5%, and the unaffiliated make more than half the population, with many converting to Christianity every day.

 

These countries are the main focus of the Jesuits; they expect a great return to religion and spirituality when an economic collapse will bring despair to the outright majority of the population in all these countries. When bloody conflicts and devastating wars, nightmarish diseases, ominous famines, and unique natural disasters will be hitting the rest of the world, China will rise as the Christian country par excellence.

 

That’s why the Freemasons try to compromise this perspective by deliberately contributing to the worsening of the relations between North Korea and South Korea, and to the degradation of the relations between China and the US, so that if there has to be a limited, ‘contained’ nuclear war, this takes place between China and the US, and not between Russia and the US. That’s why we hear rumors of wars coming from one or the other side of the Eurasiatic landmass.

 

VIII. The demise of the Anti-Christian Roman Empire

 

For this purpose, Jesuits need to ensure:  

1. the advance of the Zionist agenda in the Middle East

 2. the advance of the Zionist and the Freemasonic agendas in Europe

 3. the mutual regression of Russia and America

 4. the successful rise of the European Empire under the Antichrist; in the first part of his rule, they will not oppose / challenge him. They expect the Two Prophets to appear as soon as he has the Third Temple erected, and then they will start opposing him.

 

Jesuits know very well that it is their own task to prepare a Chinese army of 200 million soldiers and turn it against the European Emperor – Antichrist, when he will encircle China and East Asia from all parts. They expect that moment to come with the end of the Two Prophets’ ministry and Jesus’ Second Coming. But this is wrong and, although they play their game at the long-run and they are therefore superior to the rest, they will only cheat themselves. Their end will be even more spectacular.

 

Now, who Jesus will be, how he will first appear, how he will engulf his enemies into their own traps, who will stand by him, who will oppose -and how- the Antichrist, this is another, very vast, topic.

 

However, the idea of just a frontal battle between two persons is really childish and inconsistent with the Christian texts to say the least. By this, I don’t limit the topic to just few false Christs, the Antichrist, the False Prophet, the Two Prophets, and Jesus.

 

There will also be many other persons who will play a very important role. Already the Book of the Revelation (ch. 14) speaks of two different persons: the Lamb and the 144000 virgin soldiers (verses 1-5) and the End times King, someone “like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head”, who will eliminate the sinful and the evil (verses 14-19). Believing that the two persons are one is sheer distortion, and this confusion has been spread by many theologians related to all three aforementioned secret societies.

 

The number of important persons expected to appear at the End of Times is not limited in the aforementioned; in Matthew XII, 41-42, Jesus states that, on Judgment Day, Assyrians (“men of Nineveh“) will come back to engage in battle against “this generation(sheer reference to the evil, Maccabee-origin Pharisees whom he rejected).

 

Further on, Jesus mentions an entire southern (Queen of South) nation that will emerge at the same time to also oppose and fight against “this generation”. This nations’ magistrates will also be key persons of the End times.

 

That is to say, most of today interpreters, irrespective of denomination or religion, try to adjust their holy texts to their desires and wishes, be they theological or political, and in the process they strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

 

Now, what the Kalergi plan is, why a Freemason envisioned it, what his intentions were, and in what he was managed and maneuvered without his choosing, this is a totally different topic basically spiritual of nature.

 

However, despite ‘his’ false claims, Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi did not originate from the Eastern Roman nobility; neither the Cretan Kallergis family (of which he was an offspring) did. Many Greeks, who moved to Tsarist Russia in the late 18th and early 19th c., were impressed by, and envied, Russian nobility; so, when they returned to their Ottoman-occupied homeland, they brought with them the myth and the falsely risen claims of Eastern Roman Imperial nobility. Now, whether Richard Nikolaus knew that his family’s claims were fake and unsubstantiated or not, this is anyone’s guess. As a matter of fact, Kallergis family members had risen those claims for at least a century, before Richard Nikolaus was born.

 

 

—————————

Note

* Robert Reyvolt in Incendiary Radio w/ Robert Reyvolt – April 2, 2017 Hour 2 http://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/incendiary-radio-w-robert-reyvolt-april-2-2017-hour-2/

 

 

 

 

Scotland, ‘Civic Nation’, ‘Ethnic Nation’, and the Search for National Identity and Independence

4724123 mgsEBO0

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

The modern European concept of ‘nation’ triggered ceaseless wars and interminable conflicts over the past two centuries. But was there only one modern European concept of ‘nation’? Certainly not!

Nation – a modern term with no ancient parallels

The word ‘nation’ existed in all major ancient languages that we deciphered, but it did not always have the same meaning and resonance. As we see it, it was very common for several populations that belonged to the same nation to be organized in different states. This was already typified in the world’s first civilization, the Sumerians – an exemplary case.

Before the formation of Ancient Egypt as a state around 3000 BCE, for no less than 500 years we attest the early organization and development of the first Sumerian cities-states, namely Eridu, Ur, Uruk, Larsa, Kish, Lagash, Isin, Shuruppak, etc.

The same situation is observed 2000-2500 years later among the Phoenicians, when Tyr, Sidon, Arwad, Byblos, Beirut and other states-kingdoms coexisted for hundreds of years, at times peacefully and at times at war.

The Assyrians and the Babylonians, both descendents of the Akkadians who were the earliest Semites to form an empire with Akkad (Agade) as capital in the 24th and 23rd centuries BCE, were apparently the first nation in the world to be divided on religious, cultural and ideological grounds. This started happening at the very end of the 3rd millennium BCE.

The phenomenon was repeated in Ancient Egypt, and there too we have noticed great examples of national division due to religious, cultural and ideological grounds; the post-Ramesside period (at the beginning of the 11th c. BCE) is plenty of divisions. For centuries, Egypt was divided and ruled by two or even three parallel dynasties; the 8th – 7th c. BCE clash between the Napatan – Kushitic – Sudanese dynasty (called ‘Ethiopian’ by the Ancient Egyptian Historian Manetho) and the Western Delta dynasty (that Manetho called ‘Libyan’) reflect different readings of the Ancient Egyptian Heritage to which were willingly ascribed the peripheral nations the Berber ‘Lybians’ of Egypt’s western confines and the Kushites-Ethiopians of today’s Sudanese North (who were totally unrelated to the modern Abyssinian tribes that peremptorily and fallaciously use the name of Ethiopia for their country).

Among Ancient Greeks, the extent of the division was such that even among the same tribe’s people (Ionians, Aeolians, etc.) there were several small cities-states formed.

The word ‘nation’ in English is borrowed successively from Old French, and Latin. The original Latin word ‘natio’ meant first ‘native’ (someone relevant to his/her birthplace) only to be progressively extended to all the natives of a place as a group.

At this point it is essential to state that the confusion currently existing in English between the words ‘nation’ and ‘state’ or ‘nation’ and ‘country’ does NOT exist in other languages; in English, at times, ‘nation’ means ‘state’ or ‘country’ and a lot of misunderstanding is due to this confusion, which is highly advisable never to make. Consequently, it is important to clarify at this point that, throughout the present article, the word ‘nation’ is NOT considered as synonym of the words ‘state’ and ‘country’.

This is of primordial importance, and we need to always take it into consideration. In fact, the prevalent concept is that of an indigenous people. Only this concept makes of the term ‘nation’ a real, original value in Humanities; this is due to the fact that the term describes an indigenous community of humans. The term ‘country’ in its origin is purely geographical of context; it means land. Perhaps for several religions, a particular land or piece of land may be considered as sacred or holy, but this approach does never cover all lands and places that appeared as the result of the Creation.

Similarly, the term ‘state’ denotes the governmental mechanism that exists within some well demarcated borderlines. However, there has never been a state to have any value – except that given to it by either humans (the indigenous nation) or God (in Whose Name the state in question may have been established).

Within the context of modern disciplines of Ancient History and Political Science, there has been a long discussion about the main traits and the real essence of a nation. Several authors tried to identify what the concept of ‘nation’ meant to various ancient nations. Quite unfortunately, in doing so, most of the scholars projected their own, contemporary, views and viewpoints onto the ancient texts that they collected to study. The result is therefore untrustworthy,

What is even more unfortunate is the fact that, in Modern Times, the term ‘nation’ did not mean the same thing to all philosophers, political theorists, ideologists and historians – so, every effort to examine what ‘nation’ meant in the Antiquity was definitely linked with the concept of nation each modern author had in his/her mind.

In this regard, Azar Gat was very wrong in viewing in Ancient Egypt the world’s ‘first national state’ that was formed ‘quite early as a unified state, congruent with a distinct people of shared ethnicity’. That is utterly nonsensical! The idiotic Israeli author does not in fact refer to a ‘nation’ but to a ‘national state’, which is a state properly speaking, so irrelevant to the nation itself!

Even worse, there was no one distinct people in Ancient Egypt but many; we don’t actually know how they viewed their participation in their ‘nation’ and how differently they viewed the many ethnic components of their country.

In addition, for several Ancient Egyptian religious doctrines, the Ancient Egyptian gods originated from Napata, the Kushitic-Sudanese capital near today’s Karima, more than 750 km alongside the Nile south of today’s Egyptian – Sudanese borders. For some time, this was a mere religious belief. However, in the beginning of the New Empire (1st half of the 16th c. BCE), this belief became the cornerstone of Imperial Egypt’s Kushitic irredentism, and of the subsequent annexation of North Sudan (what the Ancient Greeks and Romans called ‘Ethiopia’) by Ahmose and Thutmose I.

It is also wrong to hypothesize like Steven Grosby that the small Canaanite states of Israel, Ammon, Moab and Edom underwent a process of nation-formation as result of the Assyrian expansion that led to their subordination to Nineveh. This approach is due exclusively to unrestrained projection of modern theoretical and political viewpoints onto the study topic of the said scholar.

Similarly, Edward Cohen’s irrelevant conclusion that ancient Athens met all modern definitions of nationhood is merely due to this author’s wrong conception of the term ‘nation’ – which he later projected onto his study subject.

Nation – a modern term with two diametrically opposite concepts

 

In modern times, all possible efforts of conceptualization, identification and contextualization of the term ‘nation’ originate from two diametrically opposed concepts.

Civic nation

First comes the ‘civic nation’ theory which is a vicious distortion fabricated during the formation of Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract concept (first discussed in his homonymous book in 1762). As he never studied History and in addition was an innovative thinker, J. J. Rousseau had a total disregard of History itself. In addition, he was characterized by an absolute ignorance of the historical nations as they had existed over millennia; in Rousseau’s fictional, unreal, and at times monstrous world, a nation was just a mass population that he should fix as per his silly ideas that he had shaped without taking into account the real wishes and feelings, desires and ideas, traditions and beliefs of any nation whatsoever.

The ceaseless wars that ensued from the French Revolution, and most of the bloodshed occurred across the Earth over the past 250 years are to be credited to Rousseau’s noxious ideas and philosophical system which was an incredible and inhuman aberration of sick ego(t)istic background.

For Rousseau, what matters in a community of people is the formation of a state, which is to be politically legitimate only through the active participation of the entire population, i.e. the citizens of the country. The cynical, absolute and Macchiavellistic ‘general will’ is all that matters in this regard, and this was quite accentuated in later reconsiderations of the concept of ‘civic nation’. This approach draws however from other philosophical systems and theoretical traditions, notably rationalism and liberalism.

In reality, when it comes to the notion of ‘civic nation’, the real identity of a nation does not matter. The ‘nation’ is not viewed as a historical development and reality, but as a group of gangsters with a common will, few materialistic targets, and therefore only target-appended ‘opinions’ as regards the social organization. For this reason, membership of the civic nation is simply voluntary. In fact, many people originating from different nations can gather together in an uninhabited place and …. thus shape a ‘nation’. Unfortunately, the real problems start when these gangsters do not settle in an uninhabited place, but forcefully remove the indigenous nation of a targeted region, thus creating two nations on the same place, one legal (the indigenous one) and one illegal (the ‘civic’ nation of the gangsters).

It is therefore correct to conclude that a ‘civic nation’ is a fake nation indeed.

Why and how all this came out of the mind of a Swiss philosopher who died in France to be posthumously reburied in Pantheon at Paris after the French revolution? To take J. J. Rousseau as per his own words, he thought that through imagination he could reconstitute the History of the Mankind; of course, this thought constitutes in itself an aberration. In the uselessly venerated Discourse on Inequality (1754), he wrote ” The first man who, having fenced in a piece of land, said “This is mine,” and found people naïve enough to believe him, that man was the true founder of civil society”; quite unfortunately for Rousseau and his theories, things did not happen that way, but this was impossible for him to know.

It was actually impossible to form any idea about this subject in the middle of the 18th c., when no Sumerian, no Egyptian Hieroglyphic, no Elamite and no Akkadian texts were deciphered, let alone studied. The only historical past to which J. J. Rousseau had access through modern translations was Ancient Rome and Greece; but these civilizations were too late if compared with the Oriental civilizations (Mesopotamia, Egypt, Canaan, Anatolia) where the first human societies were formed as we now know. In addition, J. J. Rousseau never studied the History of India, Central Asia, and China, while he was fully unaware of the then existing early accounts of the pre-Columbian, indigenous civilizations of Mexico and the Andes. Finally, his contempt for the Christian and Islamic cultures and heritage that existed in his time only deprived him from the reality of the historical continuity and finally drove him to baseless theories that lacked any solid background. His ‘philosophy’ was a fully useless and absolutely unrealistic bunch of assumptions as to just how to create a new ‘human being’ in full rejection of the historical mankind.

Like most of the world’s philosophers, J. J. Rousseau was the child of his time, and this means that he was submerged in news and accounts, reports and narrations about settler colonies, such as the Western European establishments in the area of today’s Canada, United States, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and South Africa. One must take into consideration that when J. J. Rousseau was writing, Australia was still an unknown and undiscovered land. These Western European colons were in their outright majority heretics, gangsters and renegades of their own civilization that they had abandoned in order to settle in other continents in vain search of profit, exploitation, and material treasures. These desolate colon settlements, deprived of humanity and morality, full of racism against and hatred for the normal, human, indigenous societies, and passionate for unadulterated crime, merciless exploitation of the others, and discriminatory supremacism, offered J. J. Rousseau his study scope and soon became his model for an ideal society whereby freedom, tolerance, equality and individual rights should prevail. This was an oxymoron! He was simply unable to see that his ideas did not fit the European colons’ feelings and desires, and that he had to search for a model elsewhere. The ensued disaster was quite disproportionate.

Modern theoreticians view this ‘civic nation’ as a ‘non-xenophobic’ form of nationalism, because there is no apparent discrimination among the settlers / citizens of the ‘new’ society as regards their origin; Poles who forget Polish culture, Danes who forget Danish culture, and Dutch who forget Dutch culture are equally welcome in a settler colony; but their all white aliens in Asia, Africa, ‘America’ and ‘Australia’. However, both, modern theoreticians and J. J. Rousseau disregarded totally the reality that these settler colonies gravely and discriminately disrupted the pre-existing order of indigenous, non-white societies and civilizations and that, due to the villainous and criminal identity of the settlers, the disruption of the pre-existing order very often entailed an unprecedented bloodshed or even a multifaceted genocide of disproportionate dimensions. In reality, the ‘civic nation’ is a counterfeit nation, an evil human fabrication, and a vicious immoral order.

No positive outcome can ever originate from the aforementioned rudimentary concepts. In reality, as much tolerant as these civic nations proved to be internally, so intolerant they have been externally. The intolerant character demonstrated by civic nations either to the indigenous nations in whose territories the civic nations were criminally founded (in cases like Canada, US, Australia, etc.) or to other, ‘ethnic nations’ in other parts of the world (like the African Somalis, Oromos and Berbers or the Aramaeans, the Azeris and the Baluch in Asia) reached several times the level of racist paroxysm.

It is not therefore strange that, almost one century after J. J. Rousseau, the adaptation of his civic nation theory by Ernest Renan produced a chain of catastrophic byproducts ranging from the Nazi Reich and the Soviet Union, to China’s Cultural Revolution state and the (under preparation) global state of the so-called New World Order.

Ethnic nation

In striking contrast with the fake concept of ‘civic nation’, ‘ethnic nation’ is the real, historical nation, as it existed throughout centuries and millennia. By themselves and not through the involvement of an external factor, nations feature a common language, origin, religion, culture, and behavioral system.

History demonstrates that, on the basis of the aforementioned fundamental traits, nations can be identified unequivocally; because they represent a common communal feeling of distinct identity, true nations (i.e. ‘ethnic nations’) tend naturally and automatically to function as self-determined entities.

The ‘ethnic nation’, e.g. the historical nation, has been the only generator and promoter of historical civilizations as we have known them. By definition, an ethnic nation is more difficult to manipulate, maneuver and deceive than a fake, ‘civic nation’ that can be created on the spur of the moment. The general sum of all the characteristics of an ethnic nation forms the identity of the nation, and, as this is the result of a slow process that took centuries and millennia to be formed, it is practically impossible to extirpate.

In modern times, Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762 – 1814) made the most convincing and the most comprehensive presentation of what an ethnic nation is. In his venerated Addresses to the German Nation, he revealed the concept of national identity in all its dimensions when forming the exemplary term ‘Germanness’ which has ever since been reproduced in hundreds of copies, such as Romanness, Turkishness, Russianness, Oromoness, Somaliness, Tuaregness, etc.

As it is the real result of History, an ethnic nation is drastically corroborated by means of historical references, and by the ensuing concepts of diachronic existence and national identity, which has in every case several permanent, fundamental traits. To instigate feelings of German patriotism against the French occupation (under Napoleon – in 1808), Fichte referred to the Roman Historian Tacitus who, writing his Annals 1700 years before Fichte composed his flagrant speeches, exemplified German virtues and proverbial heroism.

An ethnic nation organized in a state ordinarily defines nationality as per jus sanguinis (lit. ‘the right of the blood’, i.e. descent from a member of the same nation), and not as per jus soli (lit. ‘the right of the soil’, i.e. birth in the land of the nation), which widely practiced by ‘civic nations’.

It would be wrong to assume that all historical nations are today organized as ‘ethnic nations’. The political choices of the local elites have turned several historical nations into ‘civic nations’ because this suited best their economic – political interests.

On the other hand, it would also be wrong to accept the arbitrary division made by Anthony Smith, who thought that ‘ethnic nations’ belong to non-Western concepts of nationalism as opposed to ‘civic nations’, which reflect the Western view of a settler colony that controls a demarcated territory.

The concept of ‘ethnic nation’ constitutes the rightful global approach to the historical phenomenon of a nation; it is equally Oriental and Occidental – if such division exists, which needs yet to be demonstrated. In what is peremptorily called by ‘Western’ academia as the ‘Western world’, the concept of ‘ethnic nation’ was first described by Herodotus, the Carian Historian who settled in Athens before 2500 years, on the basis of three criteria, namely
– homaimon (‘of the same blood’ / i.e. kinship, origin),

– homoglosson (‘of the same language’ / i.e. common language), and

– homotropon (‘of the same manners’ / i.e. common behavioral system, culture and religion).

However, the concept and the reality of the ‘ethnic nation’ proved to be a major stumbling block for the powers-that-be and for all those who tried to distort and deform the world as per their criminal interests, secret plans, and hidden vicious beliefs. The strength of the national identity was at times revealed as an omnipotent factor able to persistently remain unchanged and unaltered in full defiance of the world’s greatest powers, colonial armies, and diplomatic blackmails or ultimatums.

Civic nation vs. ethnic nation: the fake will always fail

The ominous fact that not all the nations of the world have the privilege to setup their own states and the gruesome reality that hundreds of nations have been monstrously obfuscated within monstrous super-national states clearly indicate that the moving force of the colonial states England, France, and the US, and the ruling administrations of the WW I – WW II Allies fully and systematically supported the concept of ‘civic nation’ and definitely opposed the existence of all ‘ethnic nations’ in many different ways.

The US: a fake nation – realm of gangsters and idiots

This is quite relevant of their nature; the US is by definition a ‘civic state’ that was formed, not as many pretend through secession from the colonial state of England but, via successive, multifaceted genocides of the indigenous nations of the vast territory of which Washington D.C. tragic-comically pretends today to be the unnecessary and unsolicited capital. In real terms of Humanity, Human History, and Humanism, the existence of the criminal state of the US is the greatest scandal and the most evil episode in the History of the Mankind.

The unpardonable acts perpetrated by all the colons, who settled in parts of America north of Mexico, against all the indigenous nations for several centuries before the inception of the US, the inexcusable fact that the decimated, dislodged, marginalized and persecuted indigenous nations were not even consulted in the process of state formation / secession by the so-called Founding Fathers, and the unforgivable attitude demonstrated against the subjugated indigenous nations in their own occupied homelands since 1783 make of the US the World History’s most criminal, most atrocious, and most Satanic institution. Religious, spiritual and philosophical jargon was invented and purposefully used in shameless texts and bogus-declarations to plaster and conceal the above reality.

It is therefore only normal that the diverse instances of the criminal state promoted the evil concept of ‘civic nation’, opposed the human concept of ‘ethnic nation’, viewed with suspicion the ethnic nations’ attitude to derive political legitimacy from their status as homelands of their populations, reviled the ethnic nations’ tendency to function protectively against colonization, occupation, persecution, deracination, racism, physical and spiritual genocide, and constantly denied the right to self-determination, independence and preservation of their National Heritage to ethnic nations peremptorily incorporated in monstrous super-national states (which is the typical case of the Oromos, the Afars, the Sidamas, and the Ogadeni Somalis in Abyssinia – Fake Ethiopia –; the Somalis, the Luo, and the Masai in Kenya; the Furis – of Darfur –, the Beja, and the Nubians in Sudan, and so on).

In a well orchestrated manner, the three colonial states of England, France and the US did their best for ethnic nations not to form a sovereign state (the case of the Azeris whose majority are still under Iranian control is quite indicative), to lose their sovereign state (if they achieved to form one – in this regard, Somalia is the most striking example), or to limit the ethnic nations’ sovereignty to a mere autonomous entity (as in Catalonia) or, even worse, to self-regulated administrative bodies within a civic state (as in Yukatan, Mexico).

France: the world’s most barbaric and inhuman tyranny

Following the so-called French revolution (1789), the establishment of the modern state of France as a ‘civic nation’ on European soil had ominous results for the entire continent and for the world. It first triggered the separation of the world into two fictional and aberrational entities, the West and the East (the Occident and the Orient), theoretically confined to perpetual fight; of course, this was a purely Manicheistic concept, and as such it turned out to be a calamitous reality and a hecatomb for Europe and the rest of the world.

France is not a nation; there is no ethnic nation named ‘France’. On French territory, there have been several ethnic nations that were forced to cohabitate: the Breton nation (Breizh – Brittany), the Bask nation (Euskaldunak), the Catalan nation (Catalunya), the Corsican nation (Corsi), the Occitan nation (lo País d’Òc), the Alsatian-Lorraine populations of the German nation (Elsaß-Lothringen), and the Frankish nation (Langue d’oïl – Standardized Oïl) of the North of today’s France. The latter was imposed as ‘civic nation’ on all the other ‘ethnic nations’ of France as per the tyrannical policies of the French revolutionaries in the 1790s.

The extinction of the subordinated ‘ethnic nations’ was evidently the primary means of survival for the ‘civic nation’ of France; the war declared against the national identity, the cultural heritage, and the native language of France’s ethnic nations other than the Frankish was without precedent in the World History.

When today’s uneducated European politicians and ignorant American statesmen speak of Turkey’s intolerant stance to Kurmanji or Zaza natives, of Iran’s prejudiced attitude against the Azeri, the Baluch and other ethnic minorities, and of Egypt’s bigoted position as regards the Copts, the Nubians, the Beja, and the Berbers, they all forget that the persecution of Breton language in France reached a unique level of paroxysm when Breton schoolchildren were ‘taught’ by the French civic state’s occupation authorities that, in the streets, it was “prohibited to speak Breton and spit on earth”. As early as 1794, the criminal gangster Bertrand Barère declared in the Committee of Public Salvation (Comité de salut public) that “federalism and superstition are speaking the dialect of Lower Brittany” in a contemptuous rejection of communal identity, religion (libeled as ‘superstition’) and language.

In fact, in the name of a democratic society, the most excruciating and brutal imposition of the Standardized Oïl language of France’s North took place, whereas the Frankish ethnic nation became the undisputed model for the new ‘civic nation’ of France. This demonstrates that the genocidal attitude of the French revolutionaries against France’s ethnic nations was similar to the disregard and the disrespect that the American gangsters showed for the subjugated and marginalized indigenous nations across the US territory.

The genocidal attitude of the French revolutionaries is very well documented indeed. Texts dating from the first years after the French Revolution reveal the extent of the deception that led to the aforementioned tyrannical attitude. Here is an example: “Monarchy had its reasons to look like Babel Tower; in Democracy, to leave the citizens ignorant of the national language and incapable of controlling the power is tantamount to high treason”.

Another example of the premeditated genocide (announced by abbot Grégoire in the Committee of Public Instruction in 1793): “In politics, it is far more important than we think to extirpate this diversity of ‘grossly idioms’ (sic!) that merely prolong the infancy of the reason and the senility of the prejudices”. His report was titled “Report on the necessity to annihilate the vernaculars and to universalize the use of the French language”. The terminology used makes even Hitler’s worst and most vicious theories and discourses grow pale.

England: the focus of evil

What the gangsters of the successive US administrations did to the indigenous nations whose territory they confiscated, and what the Frankish nation of France’s North did to all the ethnic nations that were engulfed in the abominable, tyrannical state of the Nouveau Régime, the English did to the Irish, the Scots and the Welsh. In fact, only the processes differed slightly.

English tyranny and monstrosity in Wales

For Wales (Cymru), the troubles started with the Treaty Aberconwy (1277); it was then proved that peace is not always better than the war. After numerous wars between Llewelyn ap Gruffudd and Edward I of England, the treaty granted end of hostilities, but also stipulated that after the death of the King of Wales, Welsh independence would end and the country would become part of England. The treaty was the result of the treachery of minor Welsh princes who had sided with the enemy; these potentates soon become disillusioned and started a revolt in 1282. Llewelyn ap Gruffudd led the revolt and after several battles, he rejected to abandon his nation that his forefathers had ruled since the ‘days of Kamber son Brutus’ (the heroic times’ King of Cambria that was the original name of Wales). He was killed in an ambush during the Battle of Orewin Bridge. As per the barbaric customs of the incestuous English gangsters, Llywelyn’s head was cut off, sent to London and there set up in the city pillory for a day and crowned with ivy (to dishonor the dead Welsh King as king of the outlaws) only to be later carried by a horseman on the point of his lance up to the Gate of the Satanic Tower of London where it was left for more than 15 years.

Llywelyn’s successor Dafydd continued fighting through 1283, until he was captured along with his family, transferred to England, condemned to death by the Satanic Parliament of England, and consecutively hanged, drawn and quartered (: cut into four pieces). Wales was then stripped of all royal insignia, regalia and relics, and Welsh royal properties were robbed and confiscated. The unprecedented English terror did not deter Welsh national feelings, and already in 1294 a revolt was led by Madog ap Llywelyn.

Meanwhile, the infamous Statute of Rhuddlan (1284) had imposed the alien English ‘common law’ to Wales. English authority was successively rejected by Llywelyn Bren (1316 – 1318), who led a rebellion, Owain Lawgoch, who planned twice to invade Wales with French support only to be assassinated by English agents in France (1378), and Owain Glyndwr (King of Wales / Tywysog Cymru 1400 – 1415), who repeatedly defeated the English armies and reunited Wales for some years. The villainous English did not succeed to capture him, and despite the mythical sums of money they promised, they failed to find one Welsh ready to betray Owain Glyndwr, who had opened the Welsh Parliament at Machynlleth and planned to establish two universities.

That’s why the biased, heinous and rancorous playwright William Shakespeare, who felt inferior to the Welsh legend, portrayed Owain Glyndwr negatively as a wild and ominous person with magical powers.

To address the situation in revolted Wales, the paranoid rulers of England passed silly and discriminatory laws in 1402 prohibiting the Welsh from carrying arms, inhabiting fortified towns, and holding any office. As per this aberration, even an Englishman married to a Welsh woman was not allowed to carry arms!

A later stage of English tyranny over Wales was promulgated by the outrageous Laws in Wales Acts (1535 – 1542) when the Welsh language was banned and the Welsh legal system abolished. In an acrimoniously contemptuous manner, this trash paper describes the Welsh language and the will of the Welsh nation to stick to it in this manner: “because that the People of the same Dominion have and do daily use a speche nothing like, ne consonant to the natural Mother Tongue used within this Realm, some rude and ignorant People have made Distinction and Diversity between the King’s Subjects of this Realm, and his Subjects of the said Dominion and Principality of Wales, whereby great Discord Variance Debate Division Murmur and Sedition hath grown between his said Subjects”.

An ethnic nation, when exposed to tyranny and persecution, naturally sticks to its language and religion to best preserve its identity. Similarly, the Welsh enthusiastically welcomed the first complete translation of the Welsh Bible in 1588, and overwhelmingly rejected Anglicanism when the heretic and murderous king Henry VIII broke with Rome and the Pope. Education in Welsh language was made available under different forms and become a basic means of resistance to English occupation in the 16th and the 17th centuries. Religion became also a means of resistance against English tyranny during the 18th c. Welsh Methodist revival and after the definite separation from the Anglican Church in the early 19th c.; in general, Wales remained predominantly Non-conformist, which is tantamount to rejection of Anglicanism.

Welsh nationalism was best manifested in the late 19th c. through the Cymru Fydd movement’s activities that garnered great support among the Welsh for having reinstated Welsh values and ideas; to best propagate the Welsh determination for National Independence, Welsh nationalists evoked Llewelyn ap Gruffudd, making of him the father of Welsh nationalism, and the National Hero of Wales. Late 19th c. and 20th c. socialism in Wales may be due to Wales’ heavy industrialization, but it was also another form of Welsh resistance to English occupation and of Welsh rejection of the English monarchy. The latest offspring of Cymru Fydd is Plaid Cymru, a political party established in 1925 to advocate independent Wales, which has to be declared in the years to come as the national homeland of the entire Welsh nation (6.5 million people worldwide whereas 16.3 million people have acknowledged Welsh ancestry).

English tyranny and monstrosity in Ireland

For Eire (Ireland, Roman Hibernia), divisions, invasions and epidemics have always been constant parameters of life; following the 9th c. Viking invasions, a mixed Irish-Norse ethnic group was shaped. However, after the decline of the Viking presence, the Norman invasion overwhelmed the numerous small Irish kingdoms and progressively involved the king of England for the first time in Ireland in the second half of the 12th c.; however, the Norman control never extended over the entire Irish territory and several indigenous rulers controlled other parts of the island. A certain Irish-Norman community was formed in the first century of Norman prevalence, but the Gaelic identity of the islanders was soon reasserted and re-strengthened. Decimated because the mid 14th c. plague epidemics, Ireland remained peaceful and divided until the middle of the 16th c. when Henry VIII decided to annex the island in 1536. This triggered successive waves of cataclysmic disasters for the Gaelic nation of Ireland and, although it took almost 400 years of struggles for the Irish to regain control over their country, still a part of the island is occupied by England. The English king’s pretext for the annexation (1541) was the fact that Ireland could serve as basis for future rebellions against his throne or for foreign invasions of England.

An early form of reaction against the English rule was attested already in 1569 – 1573 (the Deasmumhain/Desmond Rebellions in the South-Western part of the island); this event was the normal reaction to the biased attitude demonstrated by Elizabeth I in the case of the antagonism and clash between her cousin Thomas Butler (3rd earl of Ormonde) and the leaders of the Irish Gerald and John Fitzgerald. London’s racist policies in Ireland involved land confiscation, abolition of Irish armies, and severe religious oppression of the Catholic faith. Led by James Fitzmaurice, the Irish marked several victories until English barbarism prevailed in 1575; thousands of civilians were killed in the process, and the corridors that gave access to the English military camps used to be decorated with severed heads on permanent basis. Hundreds of Irish military leaders were executed in the years after the end of the rebellion. At the same time, another rebellion took place in England’s north as Catholic English nobles intended to replace the infamous bogus-queen Elizabeth I with Mary of Scotland; because of the intolerable English barbarism demonstrated in both rebellions, Pope Pius V excommunicated the rubbish queen of the English. Few years later, in 1579, the Second Desmond rebellion exploded to express rightful Irish indignation for the English barbarism and due hostility against the English settlers. It ended in 1583 when, after relentless scorched-earth tactics, the English managed to prevail. A clan chief who betrayed the leader of the rebellion, Gerald Earl of Desmond, was rewarded with 1000 pounds of silver from the English government for his high treason. In a typically English and inhuman manner, the earl’s head was sent to the demoniacal queen of England whereas his body was displayed on the walls of Cork.

During the War between Spain and England (1585 – 1604), Ireland became very often the place of brutal conflicts and battles. After the Spanish Armada failed to coordinate with the Irish and efficiently use Ireland as a basis to invade England in 1588, further colonization efforts took place in Ireland. This led to the Nine Years’ War of Liberation of Ireland (1594 – 1603), a liberation struggle that was undertaken by many Irish nobles who rejected the plantation (: colonization) policies at Ulster and marked many victories over the English armies. The island was then again extensively destroyed and scores of population died because of the scorched earth tactics pursued by the English beasts. More than 100000 Irish were killed and more than 30000 English soldiers died as per modest estimates. With a better coordination with the Spaniards, Ireland would have avoided the calamitous destiny it underwent for more than 300 years after the end of this war.

Land confiscation and plantations continued during the 17th c., involving full dispossession of the Irish Catholic landowners and promulgations of vicious, inhuman, anti-Christian, and purely Satanic laws that were shamelessly called ‘Penal Laws’. In the Irish History’s bloodiest century, two periods of revolution (1641 – 1653 and 1689 – 1691) plunged the country in further disaster and caused an unprecedented hecatomb. For seven years (1642 – 1649), the Cónaidhm Chaitliceach na hÉireann (Irish Catholic Confederation) tried to materialize the wishes and the dreams of the Irish nation. Based at Kilkenny, the Irish nobles, clergy and military leaders set up a General Assembly (parliament) and a Supreme Council (government); however, they pledged allegiance to the king of England, because they were naïve enough to imagine that an agreement could ever be reached. The tensions between moderates and radicals, and both sides’ narrow-mindedness proved to be catastrophic for Ireland. As the English king was engulfed in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (England, Ireland and Scotland / 1639 – 1651), it was only normal for him to make concessions to the Irish Confederates in exchange for the dispatch of Irish troops to England to fight for the royalists. This was evidently a serious mistake made by the Irish government. The divisions led to the English re-conquest of Ireland by Cromwell (1649 – 1653), which was the most brutal moment of foreign occupation that Ireland had ever experienced, and to the termination of the Confederation. All Catholic properties on the island were by then confiscated and scores of Irish ‘undesirables’ were sent to the Caribbean as slaves.

For one more time in the 17th c., Ireland became the theater of many battles engaged and many fights undertaken, when the disreputable English parliament dethroned the Catholic king of England James II and replaced him with a foreign swindler and disreputable crook, William of Orange (1688). This was a deliberate case of shameful sedition, which the perverse English eulogized as ‘the glorious revolution’ – which shows the extent of their collective corruption, immorality and deviousness. It was only normal for the Irish Catholics to express their support for the deposed king James II. The war of two kings (Cogadh an Dá Rí), which is called in England the ‘Williamite war in Ireland’, lasted two years (1689 – 1691). Rejected in England, James II was accepted in Ireland and appeared in front of a newly composed Irish Parliament (known as the Patriot Parliament) to restore to the Irish Catholics their long confiscated lands. Although supported by France, James II failed to prevail and was defeated after many fierce battles.

A period of unprecedented tyranny started in the aftermath of the Battle of Aughrim (the last fought by the Irish supporters of James II in 1691); the English euphemistically call this period ‘Protestant Ascendancy’, but in reality it constitutes one of the bleakest moments of European History, as it makes Hitler’s Germany grow pale. The inhuman ‘penal laws’ were reinforced, and the English colons took good care that the Irish fail to repeat their rebellions. Deliberate famine caused the death of ca. half a million Irish in 1740-1741. The Irish Parliament was available only for the English settlers to be elected in, and evil projects were constantly under discussion as to how best destroy the island nation in an irrevocable manner. The worst development was of course the fact that the descendants of the alien colons started viewing Ireland as their native country, which shows that the evil policy of ‘plantations’ had generated a counterfeit entity in Ireland, i.e. a new ‘civic nation’.

Following the Irish Revolution of 1798 and the subsequent Acts of Union (1801), the Irish nation deployed ceaselessly further, well-diversified efforts to achieve national independence in the 19th c. The major historical developments revolve around the following events: the rebellion led by Robert Emmet in 1803, Daniel O’Connell’s campaign to achieve emancipation for his nation (1823) and his establishment of the Repeal Association (1830), the Tithe War (1831 – 1838), the Young Irelanders’ rebellion in 1848 (in the middle of the great famine which was again deliberately caused by the English government in order to reduce the Irish population), the revolution of the Irish Brotherhood in 1867, and the longest and most effective of all, the great Cogadh na Talún (Land War), which was an endless agrarian agitation that was led by the Irish National Land League and lasted from 1870 to 1900. The various Land Acts that the English government was forced to promulgate in the very last years of the 19th c. and in the beginning of the 20th c. heralded the end of the colonial rule. Home Rule was stipulated by an act passed by the English Parliament in 1914. The famous Éirí Amach na Cásca (Easter Rising) in 1916, the ensuing period of upheaval (1916 – 1921), and the threat of Irishmen soldiers fighting for the English army in the Western Front during WW I ushered Ireland into the next stage, i.e. the declaration of independence of the Irish Republic, the Irish War of Independence (1919 – 1921), the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921 – 1922), the formation of the Irish Free State, the separation of the northern part of the island (the unionist descendents of the colons), and the Irish Civil War (Cogadh Cathartha na hÉireann; 28 June 1922 – 24 May 1923), which was the last of so many venomous presents that the pernicious English made to the Irish nation.

English tyranny and monstrosity in Scotland

For the Scottish Kingdom of Alba, interaction and mixed marriages with some of the English kingdoms go back to the 11th c., when King Mael Coluim (Malcolm) III (1058 – 1093) spent many years at the court of the English king Edward the Confessor before fighting and killing Mac Bethad mac Findlaích (Macbeth) to become king of Scotland in his stead. Malcolm III and William of Normandy, the bastard king and invader of England, fought several wars before finally meeting in 1072 and making a peace that justified later claims of sovereignty over Scotland by other English kings.

In the early 12th c. the so-called Davidian Revolution, launched by David I of Scotland, marked a stage of adjusting the government and the society to French and English norms, styles and practices. During the 12th and the 13th centuries, increased affinities and greater interaction between the two nations led several Scottish nobles to see in Edward I of England a possible arbiter for the succession of Alexander III of Scotland when 14 contenders to the throne were about the trigger a civil war in 1286. As Edward I tried to undermine Scottish sovereignty, John of Scotland entered into an alliance with France (Auld Alliance) and this ushered both countries into what is called ‘The Wars of Scottish Independence’ (1296 – 1328 and 1332 – 1357).

Scotland was first occupied by England in 1296, but revolt broke already 1297. The ensuing wars were inconclusive, involving many battles, Scottish raids in England, and English campaigns in Scotland, truces, and executions of the Scottish nobles {Uilliam Uallas (William Wallace) in 1305}; it all revolved around the succession to the throne of Scotland and the alliance of some of the pretenders with the English. Three declarations of Scottish independence dating between 1320 and 1328 were sent to the Pope, and finally in 1328, Edward III of England recognized the independence of Scotland by signing the Treaty of Edinburgh – Northampton.

The Second War of Scottish Independence was due to the alliance some Scottish nobles made with Edward III few years later in order to overthrow David II of Scotland and replace him with other pretenders, notably the disreputable thug Balliol who after crowning himself king of Scots declared that Scotland was a fief of England. The French – Scottish alliance was strengthened by the fact that France and England were then engaged in the Hundred Years’ War (1337 – 1453). When David II of Scotland was granted asylum in France (1334) by Philip VI of France, Scottish resistance was led by many Scottish nobles. Victories were marked by both sides until David II returned in 1341. However, in the Battle of Neville’s Cross, David II was captured (1346) and subsequently held prisoner in the Tower of London for eleven years. Released under the terms of the Treaty of Berwick (1357), David II agreed to pay an enormous amount for ransom, and this progressively alienated the Scottish nation from him; at the same time, the country was also devastated by the Black Death pandemics. After David II died (1371), an impoverished, exsanguine Scotland was still an independent nation, and so it remained until 1707 under the Stuart dynasty, a family of Breton origin that had earlier held the office of High Steward of Scotland and, in 1371, rose to the throne of Scotland (Robert II).

During Stuart reign, there were again many interactions and mixed marriages with the English, internal strife between the Scottish kings and the nobles, alliance with France and wars with England (notably the Battle of Flodden in 1513, the Battle of Solway Moss in 1542, and the Battle of Pinkie Cleugh in 1547). However, when James IV of Scotland married Margaret Tudor, daughter to Henry VII of England, in 1503, the perspective of a union between the two crowns appeared for the first time.

The Scottish Reformation movement influenced greatly the historical developments, and following the signature of the Treaty of Edinburgh (1560), the French and the English soldiers left Scotland’s territory and the Scottish Parliament abolished Roman Catholic Christianity. The Scots Confession of 1560 became the formational document of the Reformed Calvinist Christianity to which most of the Scots adhered; it was however enacted in 1567. The Battle of Langside (1568) and the persecution and execution of Queen Mary of Scotland demonstrated the rise of religious fanaticism in Scotland and the ensuing civil war (Scottish aristocrats supporting James VI against Scotland’s nobles who sided with his mother, Queen Mary of Scotland) lasted many years (1569 – 1573).

When James VI of Scotland inherited the throne of England and became James I on England (1603), the two countries were found united under one monarch; however, this was a personal union that did not have the support of the Scottish nation. Quite contrarily, Scots firmly rejected every effort deployed by either James VI of his son, Charles I, to diffuse forms and rites related to Anglicanism, a most reviled and villainous doctrine in Scotland. Re-affirmation of the Scottish identity and cultural integrity was particularly noted in the famous St. Giles riots (1637) when a treacherous effort was made to introduce English-style prayer book into the Scottish Church.

In fact, the troubles had started earlier, when Charles I proceeded to St. Giles in 1633 for his Scottish coronation, using Anglican rites on Scottish territory. As the rejection was overwhelming, Scots were very watchful and when, on 23 July 1637, it became understood that another style was introduced in the Mass, a revolt took place. It started when a brave woman, the legendary Jenny Geddes, a merchant, noticed first the alien style, stood up, and hurled her folding stool toward the Dean of Edinburgh, because he had just started to read the unacceptable, alien text. As her ‘cuttie-stool’ was flying towards the Dean’s head, Jenny Geddes yelled:

  • Devil cause you colic in your stomach, false thief! Dare you say the Mass in my ear?

The religious service was interrupted by the ensuing riot, and although the rioters were removed by the soldiers, the news spread immediately across the city, and a revolt took place in Edinburgh, as the city magistrates were assailed in the City Chambers. The thunderous voice of the Scottish nation was heard, and the authorities were forced to negotiate; a Committee was appointed for the negotiations with the king’s council. As Charles I rejected to withdraw from Scotland the Anglican liturgy, the Scots revolted and the old National Covenant of 1581 was convened again in February 1638. Reformed religion was maintained in the form in which it was spelled out in 1580 and all innovations were rejected; however Scots expressed their loyalty to the king.

The members of the Covenant (also known as Covenanters) confronted the established church. In November 1638, the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland deposed all bishops and banned the prayer book; this ushered Scotland into the Bishops’ Wars (Bellum Episcopale / 1639 – 1640) involving many battles between the Covenanters, the Scottish royalists, and the English army. Weakened in England, Charles I had to compromise and even went to Scotland in 1641 and accepted the decisions of the Scottish Parliament as he had already done with the decrees of the General Assembly of 1638. As per the terms of this compromise, the Scottish Parliament had the right to challenge the actions of his ministers.

During the ensuing Wars of the Three Kingdoms (parts of which are the Scottish Civil War, the Irish Confederate Wars, and the English Civil War / 1639 – 1651), Scotland was effectively ruled by the Covenanters. Scottish army was sent to Ireland against the Irish Rebellion of 1641 with the limited scope of protecting the Scottish settlers. In 1643, the Solemn League and Covenant was promulgated and, as per its terms, the preservation of the religious reform in Scotland was reconfirmed, whereas reformation of religion was demanded for England and Ireland. The Covenanters sent several armies to England to fight for the victory of the Parliament over the king, and the Scottish troops played an important role in inflicting a serious defeat to Charles I. However, this triggered the Civil War in Scotland (1644 – 1647), as the Scottish royalists rejected the Covenanters’ extremism and revolted. Following several battles and an early royalist success, the war ended with Charles I surrendering and being held captive. In a secret Engagement, the imprisoned king promised to help Scots implement Presbyterianism in England; an army was set up for this, but it was destroyed by Cromwell in 1648, and Charles I was subsequently executed (decapitated) in 1649.

Charles II was proclaimed as king by the Parliament of Scotland 6 days after the decapitation of his father, but this was rejected by the English Parliament. After defeating the Scottish royalist army loyal to the son of Charles I in the Battle of Dunbar (September 1650), Oliver Cromwell invaded Scotland; he sent the captives back to England where many of them died of starvation and exhaustion, whereas their survivors were sent further on to the Caribbean as slaves. To survive, Charles II had to fight the Battle of Worcester (1651), and after being defeated by Cromwell, he had to escape to Europe where he spent nine years in exile.

Scotland was under severe persecution when incorporated into the Puritan England; there was no independent church, no parliament, no government, and no legal system. The annexation was promulgated by the Tender Union (1652), which abolished the Scottish Parliament, offering Scotland 30 seats in the English Parliament. However, the Act of Union was approved only in 1657 due to the political turmoil.

Following the restoration (1660), Scotland became again an independent kingdom under Charles II, but the re-imposition of episcopacy and a series of other measures were greatly resented by the Scots (they were prevented from any lucrative business in English colonies as per the English Navigation Acts). Independent assemblies, known as conventicles, gathered the support of the majority and led to the revolt of 1679 which was defeated. Scotland was terribly persecuted until 1685 when James VII of Scotland (and James II of England) succeeded his brother; this period has been described as ‘The Killing Time’ and thousands were executed in excruciating manner.

The pro-Catholic measures and policies introduced by James VII led to the sedition of seven English high traitors who invited William of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, to rule England (a bleak moment of European History that the perfidious English shamelessly called ‘glorious revolution’). James VII had to flee, but after the imposition of the Dutch swindler and disreputable crook, supporters of James VII entered into several battles, fighting to overthrow the alien rule of the sexually perverse William of Orange (who ruled as William II of Scotland).

Economic disasters befell Scotland at the very end of the 17th c. due to various combined reasons and this forced the Scottish Parliament to take several measures like setting up the Bank of Scotland and financing a great colonial project (known as Darien scheme); the latter turned into a disaster particularly because the perfidious English of the ‘West Indies’ did not come to help the Scots colons when they were attacked by the Spaniards (1698).

The union with England (1707 at the times of the reign of Queen Anne, the daughter of James VII) was a desperate act taken without serious thought and after many years of economic adversity. By 110 to 69, the Scottish Parliament adopted the Treaty of Union in January 1707, making of Scotland a mere province of England and replacing all Scottish systems of laws, taxation and currency with the respective English practices. The union was a panacea for Scotland’s aristocracy and landowners, but it was widely reviled and loathed by the outright majority of the Scottish nation.

The three centuries of annexation failed to erase the Scottish national identity, cultural integrity, linguistic diversity, and behavioral difference. Scotland remained another nation, an ‘ethnic nation’ incorporated into the realm of the UK’s ‘civic nation’. The Scots tried many times to reject the English rule that so thoughtlessly a meager majority supported before 307 years.

The unpopularity of Scotland’s annexation to England generated many rebellions and already in 1708, James Francis Edward Stuart, son of James VII, attempted to land to Scotland with 6000 French soldiers and join forces with his supporters who became known as Jacobites. In 1715, the indignation against the rise of George I as successor to Anne of England led to generalized revolt in Wales, Scotland, and parts of England. The Jacobites lost several battles before James landed in Scotland, and he had therefore to flee back to France. In 1719, the Jacobites counted on Spanish assistance, but were finally defeated on the Battle of Glen Shiel. In 1745, James’ son, Charles Edward Stuart, landed in the Hebrides and, after gathering support, he sailed to Scotland and invaded Edinburgh. He did not only prevail over the English forces in the Battle of Prestonpans, but advanced into England, besieging and taking several cities as far as Derby. However, there he failed to get support for a Stuart Catholic restoration in the country, and he retreated to Scotland as an English army was approaching. Petty politics prevailed over the national Scottish case, and the liberals managed to regain control of Edinburgh. Following several battles and defeats, and after hiding for several months, Charles had to sail back to France in 1746. Genocidal practices were attested then, as the English army deliberately killed dozens of thousands of Scots, while sending scores to the English colonies as slaves. Gradually, Jacobitism waned and failed to gather support from the main Catholic courts of Europe. With the death of the last pretenders, this movement reached an end.

Terrible oppression matched with extensive corruption was the English method employed in order to preserve Scotland within the loathsome and tyrannical English state. By offering career opportunities and business chances to middle and upper-middle class Scots, the English government tried to make them expatriate to England and in the process lose their identity, language, and culture. In other words, they tried to turn Scotland’s ‘ethnic nation’ into a ‘civic nation’.

Lawless, evil legislation was then produced en masse in England for the purpose of Scotland’s disfigurement, identity destruction, language loss, and cultural disintegration. The Dress Act, the Act of Proscription, the Clan Act, the Disarming Act, and the Heritable Jurisdictions Act, all promulgated in 1746, prohibited Scottish language, forbidding every single aspect of Scottish culture, and crushing the Scottish clan system. In the process, it was prohibited for Scots to bear arms and wear tartans, whereas forced displacement deracinated hundreds of thousands of Scots from the Highlands where the rejection of the catastrophic union was overwhelming. It was an accomplished ethnic cleansing of the Scottish Highlands with full scale transportation of Scottish clans to other locations.

Scottish Law was abolished and jurisdiction by Scottish clan chief prohibited; English Law was imposed instead. ‘Justifying’ the destruction of an ‘ethnic nation’ and the Nazi-like imposition of a ‘civic nation’, Lord Hardwicke rejected the concept of multiple jurisdictions, stating that ‘private jurisdictions’ (as he described the Scottish traditional Law) would endanger liberty by encroaching on the legal authority of a constitutional monarchy. This is enough to make clear how fake a ‘civic nation’ is and how tyrannical it can be.

Pseudo-Christian school prayers for the king of England and his disreputable family were enforced throughout Scotland, whereas many other methods were devised to prevent children from being attached to their Scottish national identity, social organization, linguistic continuity, and cultural integrity (which were called in a typical Nazi-like manner ‘rebellious principles’).

The Highland Clearances are a shameful English euphemism for what is known among Scots as Fuadach nan Gàidheal, i.e. “the expulsion of the Gael”. They consisted in a century-long practice of forced displacement of Scotland’s most authentic, conscious, and traditional part of population. Under the pretext of setting up enclosures for sheep in order to revolutionize agriculture, the Nazi-like government of England expelled the indigenous inhabitants who represented a millennia long historical continuity in their homeland, i.e. Northern Scotland (the Highlands).

The main target was neither the land confiscation – expropriation to the benefit of some noble landowners nor the eviction of the inhabitants who relied on small scale agriculture, but the systematic destruction of the Scottish Gaelic culture. The forced emigration was of unprecedented scale, involving forced resettlement in the Scottish lowlands and the sea coast, and further on to North America or other English colonies in Asia and Australia. The series of events described as ‘clearances’ lasted from the mid 18th c. until the 2nd half of the 19th c. and the result was the total destruction of Scotland’s cultural topography; today, more descendents of the Highlanders live in America, Asia and Australia than in Scotland.

Some of the worst moments of the century-long ethnic cleansing occurred in the so-called Year of the Sheep (Bliadhna nan Caorach – 1792), when tenant farmers arranged a spectacular protest, removing more than 6000 sheep from the land around Ardross. Another particularly atrocious period was the decade 1811 – 1820, when it was common to evict 2000 families in one single day, fully expropriating them from their ancestors’ land. The disreputable and incestuous English aristocracy was the major accomplice in the process as they became the landowners of the confiscated lands; their racist, inhuman and Satanic mentality was epitomized by a sentence written by the filthy duchess of Sutherland in her correspondence with an Englishman: “Scotch people are of happier constitution and do not fatten like the larger breed of animals”. (http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/columnists/the-duchess-the-highland-clearances-the-housekeeper-and-a-story-to-make-you-weep.24229043)

Living in England at the time, Karl Marx described the Highland Clearances as spoliation, fraud, robbery and usurpation carried out under ‘reckless terrorism’. In the middle of the 19th c., an entire school of racist philosophers, theoreticians and ideologists rose to pro-eminence in England, trying to ‘prove’ in a ‘scientific’ manner that the Scottish Celtic race was inferior to the Anglo-Saxon; it gathered overwhelming support among the bastard ‘civic nation’ of England.

For Alex Salmond, Scotland’s First Minister, unveiling a 3 m high bronze named ‘Exiles’ in Helmsdale, Sutherland (July 2007) was a minimal contribution to the Immortalizing of the thousands of dead, emigrated and persecuted Scots.

Scottish literature became for centuries a means of anti-English resistance, and among many great poets of the Ossian circle, Robert Burns (1759 – 1796), Scotland’s national poet, proved to be the herald of the Gaelic Revival in the late 19th c., of the Scottish Renaissance in the 20th c., and of the Scottish Gaelic Renaissance in our times. The Scottish Covenant, proposed in 1930, promoted in 1939, and signed by two million people in 1951, exemplified these demands, whereas the Scottish Unionist Party declined and was duly dissolved finally in 1965. As devolution referenda strengthened Scots’ political consciousness, the Scottish National Party gathered momentum.

A higher stage was attained when Mike Russell, Member of the Scottish Parliament (SNP), spoke in Scottish Gaelic in a European Union meeting in May 2010. It became evident that full independence, and not mere home rule, is the demand of Scotland’s new generation. Alex Salmond’s defeat in the Independence Referendum (18/9/2014) reflects basically a wrong choice; instead of viewing Scots as a ‘civic nation’, SNP must rediscover and reassert Scotland’s ethnic nation in all its characteristics, dimensions and capacities.

Why Former Ottoman Provinces cannot become Proper States

(First published in a shorter form in www.buhodle.post – Friday, July 5th, 2013)

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

 

Emperor Shalmanaser III of Assyria Emperor Tiglath Pileser III of Assyria Emperor Sargon II of Assyria Emperor Assurbanipal of Assyria Inscription dedicated by King Nebukadnezzar of Babylonia Persepolis, the capital of Achaemenid Iran Augustus, First Roman Emperor Sassanid Iranian Emperor Khusraw (Chosroes) I Justinian i, the Greatest Eastern Roman Emperor The coins of the Umayyad caliphs looked like those of the Sassanid Iranian Emperors Jabir ibn Hayyan. one of the greatest scholars of Abbasid Baghdad Mosque of Cordoba The destruction of Baghdad 1258 Nasir al Din al Tusi, one of the greatest scholars of the Islamic Golden Ages - 13th c. The Istambul Observatory, 1577

Emperor Shalmanaser III of Assyria

As commentary to an earlier article, a shrewd reader’s question hit at the very epicenter of today’s most critical problems of the Islamic world; the question was why the modern states, which were Ottoman provinces before being progressively detached from Turkey (from 1798 to 1918), namely Egypt, Algeria, Aden, Sudan, Tunisia, Eritrea, Djibouti, Oman, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia, cannot become – once for all – normal, independent states, and as such implement a proper nation building process, and demonstrate public order and discipline, while abiding by their traditions and cultures.

 

  1. Arab Spring can happen only to Pseudo-States

The question is very timely as the fake revolutions, fallaciously termed as ‘Arab Spring’ by the Freemasonic – Zionist mass media, proved to be the result of a sheer, yet systematic and sophisticated, manipulation of the local mobs by the secret services of the US, UK, France, Holland, Belgium, Israel, Canada, Australia, and eventually other Western countries (in coordination and for a rather long period that only recently showed its dreadful result).

 

To truly understand what has happened to the aforementioned destitute, wrecked pseudo-states, one has to correctly assess first how the leading Western countries are ruled, and to retrace the origin of their ruling system, before making comparisons. The essence of the administration, and of the ruling system of a country, determines the success of a state, society and people, irrespective of religion, culture, language, origin, past, and location.

 

In what is called today “foreign policy” at the local level and “international politics” at the global level, there is a most important element that eclipses all the rest, because it comprises of a most determinant set of rules as to how to successfully implement governmental plans and programs, promote national interests and concepts, and make national enemies’ plans fail. This element is called: “imperial government”. Of course, this is not openly admitted at any level, namely a) politics, foreign policy making and diplomacy, b) education and political science, and c) mass media and publications. On the contrary, a great effort id deployed to conceal and obscure this reality.

 

  1. The Origin of the Imperial Government 

Imperial government existed in the Ottoman Empire indeed, and it was an excellent combination of two imperial governmental traditions, notably the earlier Caliphates’ governmental tradition and the Christian Eastern Roman governmental tradition; the first goes back to the 7th c. CE, whereas the second is relevant of the 4th c. CE (the times of the Christianization of the Roman Empire), and of the end of the 1st c. BCE (the initial period of inception of the Roman Empire). It is of seminal importance to notice that the Islamic Imperial governmental tradition, since its very beginning and the emergence of the Umayyad dynasty of Damascus, was always interconnected with the Eastern Roman governmental tradition; quite indicatively, Greek was the official language of the Islamic Caliphate for several decades until 701 before being replaced by Arabic – when the ‘contents’ of the notion of Imperial Government were fully transferred within the newly appeared state.

 

However, both lines of tradition rely on earlier stages of imperial government; the early Omayyad Caliphate was also formed under the strong impact of the Iranian Sassanid governmental tradition, which in turn depended on earlier Iranian dynasties’ governmental tradition (Arsacid, 250 BCE – 224 CE / Achaemenid, 550 – 330 BCE). Successively, Iranian imperial government was traced after the Assyrian – Akkadian Mesopotamian imperial governmental tradition that goes back to the middle of 3rd millennium BCE, when the original concept of the Universal State as Imperium was developed under Sargon of Akkad the world’s first and foremost forefather of emperors.

 

On the other hand, the Roman imperial government was formed under the strong impact of the Oriental imperial governmental tradition and due to a strenuous search for the concepts and the principles of other nations’ imperial governmental tradition. The Egyptian imperial governmental impact on Rome took also a strikingly religious and philosophical dimension, due to the diffusion of Ancient Egyptian cults, faiths, mysteries and ideologies across the Roman Empire; hundreds of temples dedicated to Isis, Osiris, Horus, Anubis and other significant representatives of the Ancient Egyptian Pantheon have been excavated in Italy, Greece and other Balkan states, Germany and Central Europe, France, Belgium, Holland, and England, as well as across the Iberian Peninsula. The academic series of publications EPRO – Etudes Préliminaires pour les Religions Orientales dans l’ Empire Romain (French acronym for ‘Preliminary Studies on the Oriental Religions within the Roman Empire’) contains more than 150 voluminous books, but nothing of all these reflections and representations of the historical truth was ever duly popularized in Europe, North America, and elsewhere.

 

The Roman search for the Ideal Imperium went back to Assyria too. Romans attempted to imitate and reflect attitudes, behaviors, thoughts and concepts of the Macedonian Emperor, and invader of Achaemenid Iran, Alexander the Great of Macedonia whose ideal imperial concept can be evidently retraced back to the 8th – 7th c. BCE Sargonid Assyrian Empire, the greatest of all the Oriental Empires. Several centuries after Alexander of Macedonia, the national poet of Rome stated that the new imperial capital should become a New Nineveh – the capital of the Assyrian Empire opposite today’s Mosul on the eastern bank of Tigris (Dicle) river.

 

Studies focused on the imperial governmental ideology and the history of the administration of the Sargonid Assyrian Empire lead to the conclusion that not any other later or earlier ideology had the intellectual vigor, the spiritual strength, and the philosophical universality of the Sargonid Assyrian Empire (722 – 609 BCE). All the later empires only imitated Nineveh, and always failed to reflect the Assyrian majesty and splendor in their entirety.

 

The Oriental Imperial tradition was transferred from empire to empire, and from the Orient to the Occident (the terms denote merely a geographical distinction – no cultural distinction), and although the tradition did not remain exactly the same, it survived down to the Ottoman Empire, the Safavid Empire of Iran, and the Mughal Empire of India.

 

At the same time, the imperial tradition was also preserved in several European medieval and modern states, namely the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation (which was later known as Austria-Hungary), Spain, Russia, France, England, Germany, and Italy. However, in reality, all of them were mere shadows of the Christian Roman Imperial government in terms of Empire conceptualization, Imperial Universality, Government & Society contextualization, spiritual strength, and Weltanschauung; quite contrarily, they were far crueler and at times inhuman and barbaric.

 

  1. The End of the Imperium in the West, & the Villainous Freemasonic Lodge

The attested barbarism, lowly character, corrupt nature, villain attitude, and the ensuing overall vulgarization that were involved in modern European imperial states were only due to the slow but firm infiltration of the Freemasons. In this regard, it goes without saying that the degree of vulgarization corresponds only to the level of Freemasonic infiltration. The Ottoman Empire, Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Germany were far less vulgar than England and France as empire forms and ruling systems, because the latter two states were already in the 19th c. almost fully controlled by Freemasons.

 

When the apostate Freemasonic lodge failed to control a targeted empire through infiltration, subversion, coercion, and (at times) by forcing a compromise on the imperial family, other means were used to destroy it, namely ruse, deceitful alliances, wars, rebellions or a combination of methods. Freemasonry brought to power lewd, deviate, and monstrous villains with no moral compunction, and they became the new ‘elite’ (whereas in reality they could never be any) – only to contribute to the gradual erosion, advanced decay, and final demise of the Imperial Government system.

 

In this regard, the French revolution (1789) was an ignoble and hideous means by which the Freemasons brought down the Catholic Christian French Kingdom.

 

World War I was an enormous trickery aptly stage-managed by the Freemasonry-controlled pseudo-imperial (the term is used because the lowly and villain character of the rulers) governments of France, England, and the US in order to eliminate imperial states that were not controlled by the Freemasons (Austria-Hungary, Germany, Russia, and the Ottoman Empire).

 

With the rise of the Freemasonic involvement, the imperial government took a lewd, lowly, and vulgar character that is best portrayed in the latest imperial formation, e.g. the US administration which is well-known for its coarse and beastly officers, the likes of the disreputable Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Clinton, Bush and Obama.

 

  1. The Slow Decline of the Imperium in the Islamic World

Over the centuries, there were several negative developments within the Ottoman Empire (1301 – 1922), the Safavid and Qadjar Iranian Empires (1501 – 1736 / 1796 – 1925), and the Mughal Empire of India (1526 – 1857) that progressively brought decadence and decomposition to the three gigantic Islamic realms that controlled the whole territory from Atlantic to the Pacific. These developments were not economic or military of character; they did not reflect any ceremonial or protocol change within the imperial administration, nor did they result from any degeneration of the imperial system of rule itself.

 

Quite contrarily, the gradual phenomenon of the Islamic Imperial decadence was due to the slow diffusion and penetration of corrupt, false, barbaric, and disastrous theoretical, judiciary, and theological systems that cannot bring but decay and chaos wherever they appear and are allowed to survive. It was a quite long process that lasted no less than one millennium, although one can pinpoint some key moments. Actually, these developments had started even before the rise of the Ottomans, and are therefore integral part of Islamic History.

 

These negative developments consist in the widespread diffusion and adoption of un-Islamic, anti-Islamic, inhuman and barbaric theories and ideas that were successively composed by the lowest of the low theologians of Islam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780 – 855), Ahmad ibn Taimiyah (1263 – 1328) and Muhammad ibn Abdel Wahhab (1703 – 1792). All three lived in different eras (with an approximate 400 years’ distance from one another), but had indeed a lot of traits, attitudes and behaviors in common; their succession involves also the fact that among them the posterior referred to the anterior as his ‘valuable’ theological master. All three were of lowly, uncultured and uneducated origin; they were rejected by their masters as wrong and incapable students of Islam; and they were imprisoned or pursued for heresy and rejection of the Islamic governmental authority, and for threatening the safety of the Islamic state.

 

Their pathetic and worthless pseudo-theories have had also a lot of common points. They came out of a limited background and were deprived of the basic perceptive abilities; during their poor studies, they had a minimal exposure to diverse fields of knowledge; they were totally unaware of other civilizations, cultures, philosophies and ruling systems; they totally misunderstood basic notions of intellectual life; they deeply hated any open-minded standpoint because it contained elements of which they had no clue; they loathed and reviled reason, reasoning, exploration, analysis, synthesis, comparison, argumentation and knowledge contextualization because their incapacitated minds fully prevented them from all key theoretical and academic processes; they were totally cut off from any spiritual dimension, and ended up as vicious nominalists and unconscious materialists.

 

What ensued from their personal failure was a reduced and false microcosm that they idiotically identified with what they thought that Islam is/was (or can be) and catastrophically tried to defend – at the calamitous detriment of real Islam that they never imagined, let alone understood.

 

They therefore reflected a simplistic approach to society, state and world affairs; as they hated knowledge and wisdom they turned out to be ignorant fanatics able only to stick to their silly assumptions and useless opinions. As their childish and worthless minds could never encompass the perplexity of the Islamic Imperial Government, they totally failed to grasp what was necessary for the Islamic Caliphate in order to prevail over its enemies.

 

Consequently, they totally disregarded the fact that their nonsensical ideas and catastrophic opinions would assuredly weaken the Islamic Imperial state – only to the benefit of the enemies of Islam. They calmly promoted misery and ignorance because of their limited mindsets, and they generated a downgrading spiral within Islam because of their attachment to their poor and execrable background from which they originated.

 

As they hated self-improvement and had actually no ability to properly learn and improve their mental and intellectual qualifications, they came up with reductionist, minimalistic structures at the antipodes of every cognitive system.

 

Their thought structures were all gravely anti-Islamic, because they triggered among followers the complete rejection of study, research and knowledge, thus spreading unadulterated barbarism of cataclysmic dimensions and consequences. Particularly Ahmad ibn Taimiyah can be credited with an effort to also alter and distort Islam, by diffusing polytheistic concepts – that he simply was not mentally and intellectually capacitated to assess in their proper dimensions and nature.

 

The evil followers of the above trashy, fake imams flattered all the weaknesses and all the vices of low, ignorant and villainous people whom they did not want to educate, empower and improve, but only use for their scheme to take control over the Islamic Government and impose their ignorant and idiotic opinions.

 

Through these evil methods, and after discrediting great philosophers and erudite scholars, prominent architects and artists, leading scientists and spiritual teachers to the eyes of the mob, the followers of the three fake imams managed to always widen their sphere of nefarious influence and to acquire a remarkable power within the society they lived in. Their gradual rise to predominance is also due to the fact that the Ottoman Empire was involved into too many war fronts (against Portugal in Eastern Africa, against Spain in Northwestern Africa, against Austria-Hungary in Central Europe, against Russia in the plains of Ukraine, and against Iran in the Caucasus and Zagros Mountains region) and the Sultans were reluctant to focus on and resolve their vast empire’s internal affairs. Similar developments took place in Iran and India. Of course, the above description is quite short and schematic; there have been many other theologians of lesser importance who followed in the path of the above mentioned three calamitous figures, further diffusing similar ideas and spreading decay and disaster.

 

  1. The Culmination Point in the Fight between Civilization and Barbarism within Islam

The negative results of the aforementioned developments started being noticed around 1580. The ignorant, uneducated, vulgar, and Satan-led mob that followed Ahmad ibn Taimiyah’s filthy concepts and silly ideas attacked the Istanbul Observatory and destroyed what was at the time the world’s most advanced Center of Learning and Research. Which was the reason? Science was unnecessary to them!

 

Founded by the leading astrologist and astronomer Taqieddin Efendi (Taqi al Din), the Istanbul Observatory was better equipped than Tyho Brahe’s in Central Europe (Uraniborg), whereas Taqieddin Efendi’s Zij (observational clock) was more advanced than Tyho Brahe’s and Copernicus’. This was due to the fact that, when Taqieddin Efendi petitioned Sultan Murat III to finance the construction and the equipment of the Observatory, he had in mind the famous Samarqand Observatory which had been constructed under the guidance of Ulugh Begh (1394 – 1449), one of the top Muslim erudite scholars of all times whose astronomical and mathematical texts were translated to Latin in 15th c. Europe.

 

The execrable and barbaric theologians and followers of Ibn Taimiyah knew that, if Islamic Knowledge and Imperial Power were diffused among the people and, in parallel, their ignorance and darkness were removed, the Ottoman Empire would control the entire world. But the true Islam and the Islamic Caliphate were very hateful to them, because they considered as ‘Islam’ their own Satanism and barbarism. Provenly acting under Satan’s guidance, they mobilized the mob against erudite scholars, scientists, astrologists and astronomers, they assassinated philosophers, artists and intellectuals, they disregarded Islamic Science, Literature, Philosophy and Art, they propagated a catastrophic lack of interest for the ‘other’, and they disreputably taught their ignorant and pathetic followers that Islam is just limited to prayer, fasting, and few other acts of worship – of which they did not know even the real meaning and reason.

 

This development greatly affected the Imperial Government of the Ottoman Sultans; more and more silly and uneducated people started working in important positions of the administration. Wherever practiced, the Imperial Government has always been linked with Knowledge and Science (in Islam, Christianity, Rome, Iran, Egypt and Assyria). The reason is simple: you cannot govern an empire without perceiving correctly, knowing in detail, and understanding in-depth. No empire can exist without Spirituality, Wisdom, Science, Intellect, Art and Ethics. And villains like Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ahmad ibn Taimiyah have none of them.

 

Deprived of spirituality, the Islamic prayer is a worthless form of verbosity. The same is actually true for any prayer performed by any adept of any religion anytime anywhere. However, the anti-Islamic and barbaric theological systems that prevailed among Muslims due to the increased diffusion of the heretic opinions and vicious teachings of ibn Hanbal and ibn Taimiyah progressively eliminated every trace of spirituality among Muslims.

 

Similarly, deprived of spirituality, the Islamic fasting is just an odd and incomprehensible diet. Worse, as it is practiced today, within the – largely undetected by the Muslims – materialistic culture that enveloped Islam during the colonial and postcolonial times, Ramadhan fasting can become an explosion of fabulous, Lucullan iftars (meals) at the antipodes of the very principles that stand behind the concept of Islamic fasting.

 

The above are only two examples of de-conceptualized and de-contextualized, fake Islam that prevails widely among today’s Muslims who are fully unaware of the development that took place progressively from generation to generation due to the encrustation of the aforementioned alien theological systems on the main body of the Islamic beliefs.

 

Compared to the Imperial Government in Islam (which is what we call the Islamic Caliphate – Islam’s top materialization on Earth), the Islamic prayer and fasting are merely two important elements of cult; nothing more. But the prevalence among Muslims of a de-conceptualized, de-contextualized and de-spiritualized cult entailed also the emergence of a de-valorized perception and understanding of the Islamic Government, e.g. the Islamic Caliphate.

 

Many countries can survive and have actually survived for centuries after the local people lost their original spirituality and faith; this situation certainly represents a form of decadent culture, but the concepts of rule, law, government and discipline can be still intact and strong, sustaining a powerful administration and a formidable military force for generations.

 

But when the spirituality of the Caliphate, the concept of God’s representative on Earth, the entire semiotic context of the Islamic Imperium, and the real value of the Islamic Government are lost, then the average fake Muslim has a viciously false, desecrated idea about his ruler, and the total and final collapse comes fast.

 

This means that the Satanic systems of Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ahmad ibn Taimiyah eroded the Islamic society from inside, and in the process, they did not only alter the Islamic faith but also weakened the Islamic state by destroying the average Muslims’ concept of, devotion in, commitment to, reliance on, and passion for, the Islamic Empire.

 

In the Golden Age of Islam, for the high administrators of Abbasid Baghdad or Umayyad Andalusia, and for the magistrates of other great states of the Islamic Ages, the performance of prayer was a secondary matter of minor importance, because serving the Caliphate was already a spiritual dimensions’ service of the utmost value. Their focus was therefore on the Spirituality, Knowledge and Art of Governing; when all this went lost because of Ahmad ibn Taimiyah’s villainous barbarism, the Islamic Empire underwent its final downfall.

 

What today’s idiotic sheikhs and uneducated imams fail to understand is that, if the prayer and the fasting are harmful to the Supreme Power of the Caliphate (the Islamic Imperial Government), they are rejected by Allah and become ultimately a curse for the hypocrites (munafiqun) and the infidels (kuffar) who only impersonate the Muslims, without truly being faithful. This is so because the top interest, concern and commitment of a Muslim should be the consolidation of Islam’s power in this world, and this involves as top priority not a fake prayer and a ridiculous fasting but a wholehearted contribution to the supremacy of the Islamic Caliphate.

 

In fact, there cannot be any Islamic prayer that is good for a Muslim when the act of the prayer is due to a state of mind that can harm the Islamic Imperial Government in any sense.

 

  1. The Freemasonic Colonial Powers and the Collapsed Islamic Imperium

In the modern times and for the past 200-250 years, due to the ignorance and idiocy imposed among Muslims by the Freemasonry-led Western colonial countries through the fabricated by Western academia, un-Islamic and anti-Islamic system of ‘Political Islam’ or ‘Islamism’, the outright majority of the Muslims failed to understand that, in the material world, Islam equals Islamic Caliphate, and when the Islamic Caliphate does not exist, there is no Islam.

 

But I am digressing. To go back to the original subject and terminate the present brief analysis, I should add that, when the Freemasonry-led Western colonial powers entered into competition and undertook their expansionist policies, they sent their agents in the lands of Islam. These agents presented themselves as travelers, scholars, explorers, etc. and as such they were allowed to cross and observe / study the Islamic lands; this was certainly a terrible mistake and a great part of naivety from the part of the Islamic authorities which can be interpreted as an indication of the advanced decay. The Western agents reported back home the disastrous situation that prevailed in the Islamic World (Ottoman Empire, Iran, India and other territories in Asia, Europe and Africa). Even in the case of militarily strong countries (like 17th century Ottoman Empire), the local societies were already rotten, tenebrous and barbaric, because of the widespread diffusion of the perverse and Satanic ideas of Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ahmad ibn Taimiyah that had meanwhile prevailed in even larger scale one way or another, eliminating Spirituality, Wisdom, Science, Exploration, Philosophy, Aesthetics and Ethics, and turning the already de-spiritualized religion of Islam into a ridiculous judicialized pseudo-religion of do’s and don’ts, a worthless nominalist dogma of uncultured and uneducated imams and sheikhs, and a materialist theory accepted by followers only because of the rewards ‘promised’ in the Hereafter for their orthopraxy.

 

The Freemasonic Anglo-French plan to eradicate Islam, which means to eliminate the Islamic Imperial Governments (because without them there is no Islam in this world), was now in motion. As the central power of the Islamic World was the Ottoman Empire, it became the main target of the English and the French agents, explorers, businessmen, military, academia and diplomats. In prominent position among them, there were the Orientalists: those who unearthed archaeological evidence, deciphered epigraphic material, published textual records, conceptualized and contextualized the past of the targeted countries as per the interests of the colonial powers, and in brief, robbed the Heritage and the Identity of the Orient from their own owners without them even imagining of what they were losing…..

 

The Western diplomats, agents and academics knew very well that the local people were idiotic and ignorant, silly and trashy, because of the diffusion of the teaching of Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ahmad ibn Taimiyah, and they concluded that, although Muslim, they would be easy to manipulate and cheat, because their idiocy marked them with a catastrophic lack of sophistication. And they were right. Unadulterated coercion was thus to apply to them. And it did, quite successfully.

 

Psychologically inferior, poor, and ignorant, the local Egyptians (of 1798 and onwards) and Algerians (of 1830 and onwards), if compared to the knowledge and the sophistication of the French explorers, linguists, archaeologists and historians who flooded these two detached Ottoman provinces, would look like a brainless, silly, and uneducated child in front of a leading savant, a distinguished academician, and an erudite discoverer or inventor.

 

As the provinces were progressively cut off from the capital (after Egypt and Algeria, it was the turn of Aden, Sudan, Tunisia, Eritrea, the Arabian coast of the Persian Gulf, Oman, Libya, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Arabia), there were no local forces to understand (let alone achieve) the level of sophistication of the Imperial Government at a time the enemy invaded their lands. Due to the diffused ignorance, even Istanbul was a shadow of the Imperial Government of the great old times of Suleiman the Magnificent or his father and predecessor, Selim I.

 

Thus, Islam’s top achievement in the world, the Devlet-i Ebed-müddet (“The Eternal State”), was abandoned – first in Egypt and in Algeria and later in the other detached provinces – by the corrupted materialistic followers of the pseudo-Islamic theologians Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ahmad ibn Taimiyah, all those who did not want to die for the real Islam, but to survive like rats in the colonial regimes’ fake and distorted Islam.

 

The complete collapse of the Islamic World happened indeed in 200 years (1580 – 1798), and once the ultimate demolition of Islam was triggered with Napoleon’s expedition to Egypt, there was no apparent force in the Islamic Caliphate (let alone its detached provinces) to oppose the imperial sophistication of the Western colonial powers.

 

Worse, not even one person from the entire Islamic World managed to detect as early as 1800 or 1830 the ultimate end of the Freemasonic Anglo-French plots and conspiracies. This is indeed the chronicle of a death foretold. The end of Islam came in less than a century later, and what is even more striking is that the idiotic sheikhs, uneducated imams, and pseudo-Islamic universities of today fail to understand and admit that, following the dissolution of the Caliphate, there is no more Islam on Earth.

 

  1. What it takes to launch the True Islamic Caliphate today

Today, the re-establishment of the Islamic Caliphate would certainly solve all the troubles of the Islamic world, but there is no driving force to lead this development. There are no true Muslims – with the necessary spirituality, with the demanded wisdom and knowledge, with the required ethics and morals, with the indispensable accurate perception and assessment of the ‘other’, and with the much needed evaluation and judgment of Islam’s complete collapse and disintegration – who would be up to the task of re-inventing and implementing the Islamic Caliphate.

 

In fact, all those fake Muslims who, fanatic in their pseudo-faith and extreme in their worthless opinion, want to defend ‘Islam’ fail to realize that you can never protect what you never properly identified, learned, understood, and abode by. This tells much about what today’s primary task for the Islamic World is; Muslims must first reject themselves, fully deny their false self, liberate themselves from their corrupt mind, replace their ignorance with original knowledge, and abolish their false faith for true Islamic spirituality. For today’s fake Muslims, the top priority task is the proper re-birth in the historical Islam, and the parallel rejection of all aspects of today’s mindsets, attitudes, behaviors, lifestyles, opinions, interpretations, teachings, beliefs, assumptions, socio-political organization, and public & international affairs.

 

Re-discovering the Islamic Imperial Government and Islam, as Science, Art, Ethics, Religion, Culture, and Civilization, will not be an easy task. Actually, the proper study of the Islamic Imperial Art of Government (in total opposition to today’s villainous politics and in full rejection of today’s pseudo-Muslim gangsters who serve these evil purposes) is a very complicated task. It has always been so.

 

When the Ottoman Caliphate was still functioning as a proper Imperial Islamic Government (certainly up to 1580), it was never an easy task for an indigenous young man to study, familiarize with, and become an expert in the Imperial Government. It would take 10 or 20 years of diverse studies and associated training for someone to become a successful Ottoman, Iranian or Mughal Indian administrator. It was a complex and sophisticated curriculum that eclipsed those of the other great powers’ administrators. It goes without saying that this curriculum was not as miserable and as cheap as studying religion today with a sheikh in pseudo-Islamic universities like Al Azhar, Madinah, etc.

 

As a matter of fact, religion and fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence) were only a very small part of the Imperial Government Curriculum; there were many other more important subjects to study and learn for someone wishing to serve as an administrator, expert or adviser in the Imperial Islamic Government. To put it better, being part of an Islamic Imperial Government took a major life effort. Of course, Imperial Government meant about all continuity; people live and die, but imperial administrations live as long as an empire pursues successful policies and reproduces the class of its wise potentates, high caliber administrators, and formidable magistrates. The ruling class of an Imperial Government is therefore bound to always reproducing itself through incessant preparation and enrolment of worthy, valuable young men who can become successful rulers after pursuing long studies.

 

As it can be easily surmised, this process always happens in the capital cities of the empires. A mere farmer in Clairmont Ferrant (France), Sfax (Tunisia) or Taiz (Yemen) is good for nothing, when it comes to Imperial Government.

 

  1. Ottoman Provinces turned to Colonies, and then to Fake States

The top concern of the French and the English in their centuries long, multifaceted confrontation with the Ottoman Empire was to progressively detach provinces, and corrupt the local societies through a long list of vicious policies of alteration and disfigurement in order to achieve an advanced level of de-Islamization.

 

But as the detached provinces of the Ottoman Empire were cut off from Istanbul, the Islamic Imperial Government tradition was lost for those territories whereby the Western powers selected the filthiest and the unworthiest of the local population, i.e. all those who were ready to betray their true country (e.g. not the detached province that was merely a technical entity, but) the Ottoman Empire and cooperate with the invaders – a behavior that is tantamount to high treason and comprehensive betrayal and denial of Islam.

 

As per the typical colonial method, the local administrators of the colonial powers sent often these corrupted traitors back to Paris or London to convert them from uneducated agents to sophisticated traitors of their own country in order to subsequently appoint them as heads of the shameful local colonial administration that was setup only to exploit the detached province to the benefit of the enemy and occupier (i.e. the French and the English). How can one expect that a trashy person of this lowly behavior may ever be able to rule his country and, in doing so, mighty enough to oppose empires?

 

Take as example an uneducated, trashy and idiotic person, like Gamal Abdel Nasser! He did not pursue even a minimal part (one hundredth) of the study required to be an administrator of the Imperial Government. If one compares Gamal Abdel Nasser’s worthless curriculum, which was a mere copy of Western doctrine (so, automatically rejected as per the original Islamic standards), to that of the high magistrates of Abbasid Baghdad, Umayyad Andalusia, and Ottoman Istanbul, one understands how lower, more cowardly, more ignorant, and more impotent Gamal Abdel Nasser was to resume governmental positions. And of course he may have never reached any, had the Americans not initiated him in the secrets of being a filthy agent at their service and therefore able only to execute order given by kuffar, which is tantamount to betraying one’s religion, harming one’s country, and ridiculing oneself.

 

Where did Gamal Abdel Nasser or any other worthless and pathetic local ruler, Qadhafi, Saddam Hussein, Hafez Assad, Bourguiba, Buteflika, Anwar al Sadat, Mubarak and their likes, learn how to become an effective and worthy administrator of the Islamic Imperial Government? Already they never imagined, let alone understood what the Islamic Imperial Government is. Instead of it, their world was that of filthy (and genuinely anti-Islamic) ‘politics’, i.e. the vulgar, hideous and lowly manner of Freemasonic ruling that was first implemented in England and France (when the Freemasons prevailed in these two countries) and thence exported to the rest of the world.

 

The above-mentioned self-disastrous gangsters studied in military academies, universities and institutes, but there was no Islamic Imperial Government tradition anymore in their countries, so they could not possibly study the Art of Islamic Imperial Government. The same concerns other Muslim countries like Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, etc. In fact, when an empire collapses, the Imperial Government disappears, the tradition is lost, and after centuries of colonialism, the new, idiotic, ignorant and useless elite that comes to surface (only through the scrupulous colonial filters) acts like typical slaves of the English, the French and the Americans. This is what actually occurred in every country that is today inhabited by Muslims, be it a ‘republic’ or a ‘kingdom’. If Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey constituted an exception, it is always useless to remember that the exception confirms the rule.

 

So, how could one expect Gamal Abdel Nasser, a silly street boy and a worthless soldier, to properly serve the interests of his country the nature and the dimensions of which he could not even understand and assess?

 

And this concludes the case of the present gangsters who rule the detached provinces of the Ottoman Empire without having the chance even to imagine what the Islamic Imperial Government is (or can be) and how the great powers of the West are governed. They can only be valueless, one-use puppets at the hands of the foreign enemies of the Islamic world, e.g. the administrations that methodically destroyed the Islamic Caliphate and nowadays continue their nefarious policies of identity distortion, heritage disregard, social-cultural alteration and deformation, and economic robbery against the Oriental (not only the Islamic) countries.

 

These trashy and brainless idiots-turned-gangsters can only have the calamitous end that they deserve. The principles of the Islamic Imperial Government are always there, even though the Islamic Caliphate collapsed. These principles can never be removed. Similarly, the Islamic Ethics are always there, and no foreign government or local high traitor can ever remove them. Anyone who opposes them simply prepares an ominous end for himself and a permanent damnation for his soul.

 

  1. Issues of Islamic Imperial Government – a Model Country

To take matters more closely, I will now focus on a country that is rather viewed as ‘peripheral’ to the Islamic world, without however being so. This wrong consideration reveals the vast and detrimental ignorance that prevails among the world’s Muslims as regards the Islamic Imperial Government, which is the most important part of Islam, when it comes to social affairs, irrespective of what the ignorant, criminal, and Satanic sheikhs of Al Azhar and Madinah may think or say. The country-example is Somalia.

In Somalia, there was an Islamic Imperial Government tradition. Perhaps, it was not at the level of Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo, Istanbul, Isfahan, Delhi or Granada, but it was quite typical for countries located at the Islamic World’s geographical margin (North Nigeria, Mali, Central Asia, and Indonesia). In all these cases, local emirs and sultans referred to the Caliph as the principal authority in terms of Islamic Imperial Government, and therefore maintained close and harmonious contacts with the capital of the Caliphate. In the History of Islamic Somalia, the Islamic Imperial Government tradition was embodied in various Empires like the Sultanates of Ifat, Adal, Warsangali, Majerten, Hobyo, Mogadishu, Ajuran, and Geledi.

 

In the moment of its greatest expansion (basically 1500-1600), the Islamic Caliphate – viewed not only as the Ottoman Empire, but holistically as central Caliphate and regional dependencies – was a very decentralized form of state and a great part of the decision-making process was delegated to the regions. This was able to happen exactly because the Art of Islamic Rule was widely diffused and elaborate forms of Government bound with Spirituality, Science and Exploration were attested even in faraway places.

 

A typical example is the Great Somali Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim whom the Somalis have been used to call Gurey in Af Somali, their language. More recently, due to the colonization, the Somalis too have lost the Islamic Imperial Government tradition, and as consequence, they have been by now used to call Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim merely a ‘sheikh’ or ‘imam’, not an Emperor as they should. This means that today’s Somalis do not understand what is and what is not important.

 

Quite contrarily, the neighboring barbaric Abyssinians always call ‘emperors’ the diverse series of filthy and incestuous soldiers whose mothers were prostitutes, and who were at times appointed as thugs-in chief of their barbaric realm. To add perjury to their list of crimes, the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians fallaciously attribute their origins to Solomon (Hz. Suleyman) who – of course – never got married with the Yemenite (not Abyssinian) Queen of Sheba (contrarily to their lies), and consequently never had a son named Menelik. The false myth of Menelik was forged only lately within their vulgar, hideous and fallacious literature named ‘Kebra Negast’ that dates back to the end of the 13th c. CE; no earlier literature in any language mentions this forgery.

 

However, even before 100 years, the Somali dervishes at Taleh seem to have preserved the basics of the Islamic Imperial Government tradition in their opposition to the criminal Freemasonic gangsters of England.

 

It is totally wrong to assess that the Taleh dervishes made a war upon the English just for religious purposes; this is exactly what the colonial thugs of the vulgar, lowly, and pseudo-royal government of England wanted to diffuse in order to misrepresent the epic struggle of the Taleh dervishes for National Independence and Imperial Islamic Government.

 

Following the vicious, racist, anti-Somali propaganda of the worthless English, their regional puppets, e.g. the Wahhabi bogus-Muslims of Saudi Arabia and the Amhara – Tigray Tewahedo (Monophysitic) cholera of Abyssinia, started also pretending and diffusing the filthy falsehood as per which the Taleh dervishes fought to establish a radical, Islamist and extremist religious state. This is a vicious lie.

 

The Somali dervishes and the great King Muhammad Abdallah Hassan rejected the English presence, because of their faith in the Islamic Imperial Government, i.e. the Caliphate, and its values and principles that are the only to allow Muslims to live in a noble Islamic way and to arrange their societies as per Islam’s virtues and spirituality, and in full rejection of the Amhara incestuous barbarism, and of the Western modernism and materialism.

 

The Somali dervishes and the great King Muhammad Abdallah Hassan had kept the Imperial Government tradition vivid in their hearts and minds. They knew quite well that this was what the inhuman English beasts wanted to uproot in order to spread materialistic perversion and utter barbarism in the Holy Islamic Land of Somalia.

 

And this is in fact what exactly today’s Somalia is missing. If the true spirit and the original spirituality of King Maxamed Cabdille Xasan is recaptured and rekindled, the filthy gangsters of the English and American administrations will stop calling this Great African Hero as ‘Mad Mullah’.

 

In our effort to recapture King Muhammad Abdallah Hassan’s spirituality and vision of Islamic Imperial Government, we have to study his own model: the Great Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim who preceded him by 400 years. Spirituality deprives anyone and anything of the worthless notion of time, because in the spiritual world that the Taleh dervishes so much sought after there is no time. This means that the Great Anti-Colonial Hero Muhammad Abdallah Hassan was able to see his own model, Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim (Gurey), just face to face. He was able to grasp the very deep meaning of Gurey’s acts and targets.

 

This is exactly what today’s Somalis have failed to achieve, as they have been plunged in the useless materialist concerns and approaches generated during 23 years of Civil War and because of the ensuing dependence of a significant portion of the Somali economic and political class on the vicious, Satanic, Western capitals.

 

Yet, the only means to ensure the reunification, rehabilitation and reinstatement of the Somali Nation is the re-acquisition of the spirituality of the Taleh dervishes. Today’s Somalis need to delve in the values and the virtues of the Islamic Imperial Government as revealed by the action of Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim (Gurey). In fact, to do so, today’s Somalis have only to realize a key point: between the Great Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim (Gurey) and us today, there is less than one minute distance. Not 500 years!

 

It was not by mere coincidence or due to simple hatred that the Great Emperor tried to extinguish the cursed and inhuman race of the Amhara. He knew very well that, if they survived, they would attempt to turn the entire Eastern Africa into a hell of barbarism, ignorance, bestiality, fornication and incest – elements that were already noticed by the early 16th c. Somalis as the basic constituent traits of the worthless and lowly Amhara society. To the visionary Emperor, it was crystal clear that the utmost barbaric society would be – to the incestuous Amhara – a ‘paradise’.

 

We, now, taking into account the Rastafarian description of their villainous and Satanic ideas, we can understand how clairvoyantly Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim (Gurey) assessed the situation and wanted to disperse and annihilate the Amhara pestilence; Rastafarians promote filthiness, incest and every other bestiality, while believing that the entire African continent will be called Zion when their fake Messiah comes. Rastafarians did not properly exist before 500 years, but the core of their beliefs existed already among the pseudo-Christian Amhara, and this was well known to the Great Somali Emperor Gurey who did his best to cancel the then forthcoming hardships of his illustrious nation, the Somalis. It was quite clear to Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim that the Amhara evilness would end up at the End of Times (Al Yom al Ahar) with siding with, and offering their state to, the Antichrist (Masih al Dajjal).

 

Perfectly well versed into the concepts and the notions of the Islamic Imperial Government, Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim won, prevailed over, and dispersed the barbaric Amhara realm. However, the Emperor’s real enemy proved to be the colonial Portuguese maritime force that was sent urgently to oppose him.

 

The Portuguese, who were infiltrated and guided by Freemasons, searched to find the dispersed Amhara soldiers – who were left with no state due to the great victories of the Great Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim. The Portuguese managed to save and reorganize the dispersed Amhara (and thus to preserve them for the Freemasonic plots of the Latter Day), and they engaged the Somali armies in several battles. The Islamic Imperial Government was evidently considered by the Western European Freemasons as the main enemy, because they knew that sooner or later they would prevail over the Catholic Church in Western Europe, and that the Islamic Caliphate was what really stood on their way to setup a barbaric global state of Satanic nature.

 

The Portuguese Freemasons knew that they had to defeat the Great Somali Emperor through ruse in the battlefield, in order to allow the evil, incestuous Amhara to survive until a later and greater colonial involvement would setup a closer Amhara – Anglo-French – American – Ashkenazi Zionist cooperation in view of the forthcoming appearance of the Antichrist (Masih al Dajjal) whom the evil forces are anticipated to accept as the true Messiah.

 

When the later colonial involvement took place, 300 years after the assassination of the Great Somali Emperor Ahmad ibn Ibrahim, the English and the French helped the Amhara expand from their tiny and unimportant barbaric kingdom to all directions (north, south, west, east) and invade the greatly civilized nations of the Oromos, the Afars, the Kaffas, the Hadiyas, the Sidamas, the Ogadeni Somalis, and others who have been held captive within the barbaric tyrannical state of Abyssinia (fallaciously re-baptized as Ethiopia) over the past 160 – 60 years (as per case).

 

 

 

 

 

Liberal – Secular Opposition in Egypt, their Targets, and the Freemasonic Threats for Egypt’s Future

(Public lecture given at the Gamaaeyah Ansar wa Sunnah, Aswan – Egypt, on December 14, 2012)

The confusing situation that prevails in today’s Egypt and the intensive activism of the liberal – secular opposition do not herald anything good for the country. The great majority of the Egyptians, irrespective of their faith, ideas, and political position, are deeply worried about the future of the country. But this does not bother the liberal – secular opposition at all; quite contrarily, their leaders consider it possible to benefit from it.

How trustworthy a group of political parties can be, when they disregard the worries of the outright majority of the Egyptian people? How virtuous can they be?

Disregard of the people’s worries and wishes is the typical characteristic of a dictatorship; customarily, former president Mubarak disregarded the worries and the wishes of the Egyptian people in a very great number of political and social issues.

Opposing former president Mubarak, the liberal – secular organizations that later formed the backbone of today’s opposition tried to give the impression that they are democratic, which supposedly means that they respect the expressed will of the people, the recorded votes of the people, and the articulated wishes of the majority of the people.

The impression they gave about them being democratic is absolutely false. Not only because they are not democratic. Certainly, they are very totalitarian, and the will and the wishes of the Egyptian people are not a matter of concern for them.

The reason for which Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition is not democratic is double and deeply historical.

I. Democracy: a fake, euphemistic name for a tyrannical regime

First, in real, historical terms, democracy is not a properly speaking democratic system, but a form of tyranny. The term was first established in Ancient Greece where there was no large or big state, but rather small cities-states, like in Phoenicia. In the first half of the 1st millennium BCE, each Ancient Greek state was a small kingdom, but progressively in the 6th century BCE many kingdoms were overthrown and many cities-states became either tyrannies or democracies.

At the time, tyrant meant a strong leader who controlled militarily the small state with the help of an armed group. And democracy meant a city-state that was ruled by the will not of one person, but by the will of the people (demos). Literarily speaking, ‘democracy’ means ‘the state of the people’. But how democratic was a democracy like that of Athens in the 5th century BCE?

In Athens, the majority of the population consisted of the slaves; they originated from Phrygia, Thrace, Illyria, Macedonia, Scythia, etc. As per different estimates of specialists, the slaves in Athens constituted anything between 60 and 70% of the total population. The same phenomenon occurred in the supposedly ‘democratic’ Roman Republic few centuries later. As a matter of fact, the slaves not only did not have the right to vote but were not even considered as ‘humans’. In Latin, they were called ‘res’ that is ‘things’.

Furthermore, the female population in Athens, in other so-called democratic cities-states, and in Rome, had no civil rights, and consequently women could not participate in the decision-making process of each country. Therefore, if we assume that in 5th century BCE Athens the local population constituted ca. 35% of the entire population, we realize that, practically speaking, the political affairs were controlled by half of that population, e.g. the males, which reduces the decision-makers to a mere 17-18%. But of course only adult men were accepted, and this concludes the case of the undemocratic system of rule that prevailed in Ancient Athens: the political control was in fact at the hands of no more than 10-12% of the population, i.e. the adult males of local origin. At this point, one should take into consideration the fact that foreign residents were also excluded, because ‘local origin’ in a city-state in Ancient Greece usually meant proven residence of a family in the city-state for no less than six (6) generations, which translates to ca. 150 years!

If we now refer to each political decision taken and imposed, we certainly go to an even lower figure, because in the debates that took place, there were always different / opposite opinions and suggestions expressed, and – as in the modern fake democracies – the decision reflected the political will of the majority among this small group of 10-12% of the entire local population. In other words, ca. 6-7% of the entire population decided and ‘legitimately’ imposed their decision on the rest. In many cases, the decision meant taxes, war, death or other seminal issues.

II. Ancient Greek democracy: it was not ‘democracy’, and it was not Greek.

One should also examine whether some among the Ancient Greeks really invented this political system, and if not, how it was diffused among them. There are ancient Greek texts that illuminate this point; according to substantive textual evidence, there were many Phoenicians who settled colonies in the Aegean Sea and in different parts of continental Greece, as they did in many other coastlands of the Mediterranean Sea, nad in the Atlantic coasts of Iberia and NW Africa.
In fact, it is from the sociopolitical and administrative system of the Phoenician colonies that many social groups and political parties in different Ancient Greek cities-states got this new political concept. Contrarily to the Phoenician cities-states (Tyr, Byblus, Sidon, Beirut, Arvad, etc.) that were all kingdoms, the Phoenician colonies were real democracies; most important and most famous among them was Carthage, which was founded in the year 800 BCE in the area of modern Tunis.

Carthage, like every other Phoenician and Carthaginian colony, was a democracy, because there was a general assembly of the Phoenician colons established there, and they elected the Senate, the government and the ruler. In the light of aforementioned, it is important to note that, prior to the year 600 BCE, there was not a single Ancient Greek state to be governed by a ‘democratic’ system.

III. Ancient & modern ‘democracy’: Fake political systems based on historical forgery

But why no one attributes today the origin of Democracy to the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians, and as per the prevailing opinion the system was invented by some Ancient Greeks?

This question finds its answer in another question:

Why everyone in the West considers the Ancient Greek adaptation of the Phoenician colonies’ political system as a truly ‘democratic’ system and as a real ‘state of the people’ (as the Ancient Greek word clearly denotes), whereas in the place where this term was first created, the so-called ‘democratic’ system was deeply and clearly undemocratic and anti-democratic?

The answer to both questions is one:

Those who by controlling the leading Western countries exercise an undeniable control over large parts of today’s world,
a) have prepared and diffused their own false History (and amongst others wiped out the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians),
b) have had the need to propagate an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens, and – even worse –
c) have ruled the modern Western world (and a very large part of the world through their colonies), using a similar, unrepresentative and undemocratic system: the modern pseudo-democracy.

IV. Fake western democracy and Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition

Now, where does all this take us with regard to Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

The historical reason for which Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is undemocratic and dictatorial we already explained; they ascribe themselves to an old system of ruling that is very discriminatory and absolutely totalitarian. Even the word coined to describe this system in Ancient Greece – a word that reflects not a reality but merely an Ancient Greek viewpoint of it – was quite contradictory to the historical reality and practice of that system.

But there is also political evidence testifying to the fact that Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is in reality undemocratic and dictatorial. This is the point to discuss here. The identity and the nature of the political promoters of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition do not bode well for Egypt’s future.

Who are the real fabricators, supporters, promoters and employers of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Screening the international and the Egyptian mass media, we can safely identify them; every time there is a clash between the Islamist government and the liberal – secular opposition, they lash out at the government whereas in parallel they side with the opposition, thus shockingly interfering in the political life of the country. Who are they? They are those, who ….

have managed to control today’s westernized – ‘global’ world to large extent,

have prepared and diffused their systematic, false History,

have had the need to propagate and evidently propagated an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens in order to rule the world through this bias

have ruled most of today’s world through this bias, and in the process they disseminated antihuman, evil ideas and practices, overwhelming corruption, and ultimately imposed an evil lifestyle and way of life, deprived of virtues and values, at the very antipodes of all the earlier social models and the associated cultures and civilizations throughout History.

Who are the fabricators of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Here we have to deal with several layers of political corruption, financial dependence, and evil backstage practices.

Those who fabricated today’s various opposition groups that did not exist before 3 years, with the exception of the Wafd party, the socialists and the communists, are:

International NGOs,

International organizations,

Western governments,

Financial groups of power, banks and funds,

Research institutes and political lobbies,

And, behind them all, a secret company that controls everything behind the political stage.

What is this company and what are their plans?

With its roots retraced back to the Antiquity and with its origins going back to the 3rd millennium BCE, this secret company is ‘recently’ known under the name of Freemasonry, and they have been known under this name for almost 300 years (1717). Although marginal during the Christian and Islamic Ages, they rose to power first in Western Europe through the biases of Renaissance, Classicism, Enlightenment Philosophy, American Revolution, French Revolution, Industrial Revolution, and Marxism – Leninism.

What are the main points that bear witness to a link between the secret company of the Freemasons and Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

First of all, there are several members of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition that are freemasons; they blindly and wholeheartedly execute the orders they receive. Mohamed el Baradei is one of them. You can be sure that in today’s world no one becomes Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency without being a Freemason, and more importantly, without being a very much trusted member of the villainous, Satanic organization. Positions like that are viewed by the Freemasons as outstanding posts and key instruments in their effort to take over the entire world, so only perfectly utilizable and utilized members are promoted to and maintained in such positions.

What few people know is that for them, their country and their religion are of no value, as the oath of allegiance they made when becoming freemasons supersedes every other and every previous.

Second, there is vast similarity of political language. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition promises now to deliver in Egypt corresponds to what other Freemasonry-controlled parties, mass media, associations, organizations, statesmen, politicians, journalists and intellectuals demanded or propagated in so many countries all over the world. The terms, the concepts, the ideals, the ‘values’, the words and the jargon evoked are exactly the same.

Third, there is vast similarity of targets and criticisms. Whom do they criticize? Always anyone who is not a Freemason or a Freemasonry-controlled party, association, organization, statesman, politician, journalist and intellectual!

With exactly the same resolution, they rejected two persons that belonged effectively to two different worlds, namely former President Hosni Mubarak and current President Muhammad Morsi, only because both are not freemasons! They certainly find excuses for this biased ludicrous attitude of theirs, and they publicly pretend that they reject totalitarian rulers, but their shameless stance is easily unveiled when one notices that finally, for the Freemasons and their puppets, the only non-totalitarian rulers are their Freemasonic ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’! This seclusion-promoting, highly discriminatory mindset is diametrically opposed to the normal, unbiased, average mindset of the human beings as this was attested across millennia. Of course, Mubarak and Morsi are not the only targets of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition! They also speak negatively about Venezuela’s Chavez, Bolivia’s Morales, Russia’s Putin, Belarus’ Lukashenko, etc., etc., etc. only because all these statesmen and rulers are not freemasons!

Fourth, there is vast similarity of political allies, models and points of reference. Whom do they refer to? Who is the perfect political example for them? Who are the perfect embodiments of all the ideas they evoke? Always Western European, North American states, parties, associations, mass media that are known to be under Freemasonic control or politicians and statesmen, journalists and intellectuals who are known to be Freemasons.

Fifth, there is vast similarity of methods. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition attempts to do now, other Freemasonry-controlled schemes tried to perpetrate in other countries in various moments over the past decades. Simply, not many people noticed (let alone studied) the correct parallels! One can effectively draw parallels and compare Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition with king Juan Carlos of Spain and his associates during the last decade of Franco’s regime, and after the Generalissimo’s death. For many years, Prince Juan Carlos promised fidelity to Franco’s ideals and respect to the Catholic Church’s concepts and social standards. However, treacherously enough, after Franco died, Freemason Juan Carlos promoted Freemasonic policies and practices up to the point of signing laws legitimizing adultery, abortion and, more recently, homosexual marriages and adoption of children by homosexual couples. In a 40 years space of time, all the traditional ethics, the cultural integrity, and the religious identity of Spain collapsed. This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will prove to be good for, if it is allowed to exist.

V. Freemasonry-impacted politics & parallels between Spain in the 1970s & Egypt in the 2010s

In the early 70s, Spain was still a European country apart from the then European Communities, well-attached to the local traditions and religion, and the Spanish society had managed to be
– only slightly influenced by the so-called modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– hardly characterized by notions of atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism, and
– even less affected by all aspects of modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism, and Western morals.

How did this happen? The answer is simple; Generalissimo Franco kept the Freemasons out of Spain, and his secret services developed a sophisticated network to monitor the country and successfully identify any attempt of Freemasonic infiltration.

Today’s Egypt is still a Mediterranean – Middle Eastern – East African country apart from the present world order, and the great majority of the Egyptian people are well-attached to the their traditions and religion.

Until the beginning of 2011, few Egyptians would easily ascribe to
– modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism,
– deviate behavior, lifestyle and sexual mores that are now promoted and made legitimate in the West, and
– extensive and overwhelming consumerism as attested in the West.

And although the whole world has been increasingly ‘modernized’ over the past 40 years with catastrophic impact on the socio-behavioral system of vast populations worldwide, involving the collapse of traditional values and the disintegration of the family-based social model, Egypt was hardly affected. As a matter of fact, in Egypt, the new, deviate morals of the West have been hardly accepted, whereas modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism were repeatedly and extensively conditioned upon Islamic criteria.

Why did this happen? Following the collapse of the kingdom (1952), most of the Freemasons left Egypt because their financial – political interests were gravely damaged with the then launched reforms. Most of pre-1952 Egypt’s Freemasons were foreigners, so they knew that, despites their losses in Egypt, they could make it elsewhere. However, Egyptian Freemasons left too, first because their financial – political interests were also heavily hit and their social position greatly undermined, and second because, as Freemasons, they were more attached to their so-called ‘brethren’ in Satan than to their country of origin. They expected they would ensure critical assistance in another country, and they actually ensured it and prospered.

Under the successive tenures of Muhammad Naguib, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el Sadat, and Hosni Mubarak, Freemasons attempted a mild, soft and covered comeback, but they found an unfriendly environment and their activities were minimal if not none. At those days, Freemasons around the world were comfortable seeing Jehan el Sadat and Suzanne Mubarak promoting Western ideas across the Egyptian society and offering the model of a Westernized Egyptian first lady to the world mass media.

But the Egyptian society reacted quite well, and preserved their values and traditions, rejecting the widely spread sexualization and pornification of the daily life and refusing the systematic attacks against the traditional ethics, virtues and culture. What occurred in the Western societies over the last six (6) decades did not actually happen in Egypt..

And the notorious Freemasonic lodge of Heliopolis that is rather called Baron Empain Palace (in Arabic ‘qasr al baron’; in French ‘le palais hindou’ – named after Édouard Louis Joseph, Baron Empain, 1852 – 1929) remained closed.

How was possible for Spain to deviate within just 40 years up to the point of being a fully anti-Christian state that does not penalize adultery, allows hundreds of thousands of embryos to be killed annually, and approves of non-Christian marriages that are only euphemistically called ‘civil marriages’?

How Spain reached the bottom of the world’s corruption and immorality by making legitimate the homosexual marriages and the adoption of children by homosexual couples?

The answer is simple: through massive, sophisticated, multifaceted, multilayered, successive, and coordinated Freemasonic lies, misinformation, deception, and duplicity diffused in public in a carefully conceived, methodically programmed, and systematically executed manner. We can analyze few key points of the evil behavior and policies testified by king Juan Carlos, Felipe Gonzalez, and Jose Zapatero, Spain’s key evil figures – all Freemasons.

They never announced their real targets from the beginning; only after one first step was made – as deterioration of the status of Catholic Spanish identity and culture (ex. legalization of the abortion) – another was announced (ex. legalization of homosexual marriages). This already demonstrates the evil intentions of the Freemasons, and sheds light on the deep reasons that impose oath-bound secrecy to Freemasons. The hidden masters of Freemasonry know that their real targets are humanly unacceptable; that’s why they first hire new members promising them socio-professional success, second bind their members by oath, third deliver portions of the reality to them, and fourth oblige them to work for the materialization of the overall, evil plan that, had most of the Freemasons known at the very beginning, they would have never accepted to become members.

In Spain, the leading Freemasons-in charge pursued an evil policy, by using either general popular support or support acquired on one occasion in order to promote an unannounced yet secretly programmed target, and by fooling the people on diverse subjects in order to extract acceptance on a specific point that is part of the Freemasonic scheme. The latter technique is tantamount to subversion of the common sense.

When a key term and element of the local common culture and worldview within a certain society loses its significance, the entire system within which it was located is automatically degraded, and this brings collapse upon collapse for all the key terms of the cultural-behavioral system. This situation triggers an advanced decay, and the immediate consequence is the weakening of the remaining key terms of common culture and worldview of the society in question. This is the way to social decomposition and to ultimate destruction of the Mankind.

To this deterioration there is no end, except the total disintegration of the human society and its transformation to a bestial realm whereby humans are totally disconnected from the spiritual world, cut off from the nature, and left without religion, without family, without traditions, and without culture. Therein, as it is already attested in the jungle, every notion of sin is forgotten, and the earth will look pretty much like the hell as we know it through the diverse religious traditions and textual evidence.

This social disintegration is to be expected for every tyrannical, Freemasonry-controlled society, and this is exactly what has already happened to misfortunate Spain, as it had previously occurred to Italy, France, Germany, Holland, England, various other Western European countries, the US, Japan, and the countries of the British Commonwealth.

This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is now greatly supported by the Freemasonic tyrannies of the West to carry out in Egypt.

VI. What will happen to Egypt if the liberal – secular opposition gains momentum?

As underlying philosophical currents and ideological systems, the following systems will be forcefully diffused, while opponents will be ridiculed through the criminal mass media possessed and controlled by the totalitarian, bogus- democratic, liberal – secular opposition:
– theories that support the Western pseudo-democracies (liberalism, neo-conservatism, social democracy) by creating false dilemmas,
– atheism, agnosticism, Darwinism, and social amoralism, and – last but not least – a deeply anti-Islamic approach to World History as per which religions stand accused for all the maledictions that have befallen on the Mankind, and
– a wild overdose of modernism, modern technology life style, consumerism, generalized sexualization and pornification of the daily life, matched with mass tourism, free of any need of compliance with Islamic criteria (tourism will be further utilized to corrupt the Egyptian mores and moral standards)

What is to be expected from Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition’s political platform at the sociopolitical level is the following:
– Egyptian single females will be able to rent flats and apartments of their own, and receive their friends there without the neighbors having the right to react.
– Courses of religion in the Primary and Secondary Education will be abolished (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– There will be an increased westernization wave in the Egyptian Primary, Preparatory and Secondary Education.
– Religion will stop being mentioned on the Egyptian identity cards, and passports.
– Abortion will be legalized pretty soon.
– An increased number of newspapers will start publishing pictures of women in bathing suits even on the first page.
– Adultery will not be penalized anymore.
– Alcohol will be allowed to be sold in all the restaurants, cafés, and supermarkets across the country.
– Homosexuality will not be considered reprehensible anymore.
– Pornography will increase dramatically in very short time.
– The first sex shops will appear in Down Town Cairo, in Alexandria, Port Said, Luxor and Aswan, as well as across the tourist resorts in the Red Sea coast and in the Sinai.
– Tolerance will be shown for provocative public appearance of the homosexuals, the prostitutes, and the transsexuals in order to adjust the country mores – not to the Egyptian people wishes and mentality (as it is now) but – to the demands of international NGOs; this means that the still existing notion of public decency will collapse and disappear.
– There will be more female than male judges – in full violation of the expectation, the wishes, and the political ideas of the outright majority of the Egyptian people.
– It will be allowed for homosexuals to declare in public their nature, without anyone being able to discriminate them – in their professional and social life.
– Religion will be separated from the state (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– Progressively, Friday will become a fully working day, and Sunday will replace it as the weekend’s 2nd day.
– Arabic will be written in Latin characters and numbers by an increasing number of people (this is nowadays called ‘Franco-Arab’), and some groups will issue the first websites, books and newspapers in this fake writing system.
– At a later stage, and when possible reactions of the majority will be discouraged, homosexual marriages will become legal.
– Adoption of children by homosexual couples will also become legal.

I expanded mainly on socio-behavioural, cultural and moral issues, but there will be a grave deformation of the Egyptian economy and politics as well. Meanwhile, Freemasons will expand their activities, open many lodges, and try to further penetrate in the Egyptian society in order to faster corrupt it and adjust it to their regional interests and global targets.

An important parameter of economic character that has to be anticipated is the forceful abandonment of the Egyptian agriculture, which will trigger an increased exodus from the Egyptian farmlands and provinces toward the urban centers and the (already) big cities.

If the tele-guided and remote-controlled leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition manage to put obstacles to the constitutional referendum (note: the speech was given before the 15 & 22/12/2012 referendum where the voter turnout reached only 32.86%), stop the political process (note: here they proved to be successful by cancelling the announced parliamentary elections of 22 April – and runoffs up to 24 June 2013), overthrow the newly elected president and government, and finally climb to power, one has to expect that the percentage of the population working in agriculture will drop dramatically under 5% – under the vicious and false pretext of the ‘modernization’ of Egypt’s economy. The ensuing result will be a heavy dependence of Egypt on agricultural imports which will push the whole country to further debts and total disaster.

The recent examples of many heavily indebted European countries (Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, etc.) show clearly how cruelly and disastrously an indebted country is dealt with by the world’s leading financial institutions, e.g. the credit-rating agencies, the financial services companies, the asset management companies, the big banks, , and the hidden force behind those gangsters: the Freemasons. Now, in the case of a heavily indebted Egypt, there will be more levers of Freemasonic pressure, notably the colonial powers, e.g. France, England, America, and their disrespectful dependencies, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Holland, etc.

Egyptians from all the walks of life should take note, as soon as they can, of the fact that Greece’s and Cyprus’ foreign policies have been tremendously flexed after their grave economic problems exploded. Both EU-member states had – during many long decades – balanced relations with the Arab League-member states and Israel. More particularly, Greece had closer and warmer relations with the Arab League-member states, either during the tenures of C. Caramanlis as prime minister (1955 – 1963 and 1974 – 1980) or under the colonel junta (1967 – 1973) or at the times of A. Papandreou’s premiership (1981 – 1989).

Now, Cyprus has been sold out to Israel, and the two signed many agreements of economic, political and military cooperation; in an effort to jointly explore the gas resources of the Mediterranean Sea continental shelf, they seem to have even signed an anti-Turkish pact that remains secret. In its gloomy perspectives of survival, Israel tries desperately to engulf other countries, weak governments, and silly politicians, without caring about the catastrophic impact such an engulfment will have on those countries.

Greece is a bankrupt country that was not allowed to announce its bankruptcy officially; this happened because the vicious, corrupt, and demented European statesmen did not want this ‘event’ to trigger sudden, catastrophic developments in the European Union that would not be contained. That is why a multi-level effort has been undertaken, repeatedly changed, and properly re-adjusted in order to effectively postpone the announcement of the bankruptcy for the time when it will not affect Europe in anything. Meanwhile, the leader of Greece’s right-center party first visited the criminal Israeli prime minister to accept his terms and announce an alliance with the Zionist country and then was supported by the US and the EU as head of a tripartite alliance and subsequently appointed as prime minister (although his party did not have the majority, having gathered only 31% at the last elections).

If rising to power, Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will fast accumulate new debts to
a) comply with the orders of the Freemasonic institutions and governments that have systematically backed the opposition since January 2011 (and already before!) and
b) implement their economic policies, unrealistic promises, and demagogic pledges for which they need money that even now is not available in Egypt.

As the liberal – secular opposition’s leaders act similarly with their villainous and criminal patrons, their practices and policies will bring about a vast corruption, because they will appoint all their members and followers, tolerate large part of Mubarak’s nomenclature, and isolate the vast masses of population. They will try immediately to create a police-machine to support them in power, and the cities will be flooded by jobless fellahin because the destruction of agriculture will become target no 1 of a so-called democratic, liberal – secular government in Egypt.

Few months of a liberal – secular government in Egypt will finally unveil both, the secret reasons of Freemasonic support to today’s opposition and the ultimate target of the criminal Western Freemasons in Egypt. Few months of liberal – secular tyranny in Egypt will demonstrate why the Freemasonry-controlled, criminal, Western regimes abandoned their local puppet, Hosni Mubarak, and instigated the developments that took place in January – February 2011 in the Tahrir Square theater. Under Mubarak, the much wanted (by the Freemasonic masters of the world order) process of Egypt’s westernization, socio-economic corruption, social destitution, moral demolition, and national decomposition did not advance as fast as they needed. Of course, the inhuman global rulers would never trust any Egyptian Islamist party in power.

In fact, the secret Freemasonic target behind the Tahrir Square events was the definite substitution of Mubarak by some weak, ignorant and idiotic puppets of lesser importance (the ludicrous figures of El Baradei and Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes), who would speed up the process that Mubarak tried to slow down or even avert wherever he and his subordinates managed to notice it. If the Satanic masters of Freemasonry and the their puppets, e.g. the top rulers the present political world order, could automatically replace Mubarak with El Baradei, no Tahrir Square events would ever take place. That is all!

As a matter of fact, if today’s liberal – secular opposition manages in the future to climb to power in Egypt, the country will be ruled in exactly the same manner as under Mubarak, except the country’s foreign policy will be catastrophic for the national interests and the sociopolitical process will bring forth a vast and generalized destruction of the traditional values, elimination of the religious concepts, and collapse of the socio-behavioral system. An indescribable diffusion of materialistic, consumerist, pornographic ideas and practices will take place in order to eradicate any attachment to traditions, moral standards, and Islamic virtues.

Under a nefarious El Baradei – Hamdin Sabahy dictatorship, unemployment will be remedied with prostitution, and this concerns the imperiled Egyptian women not only within the context of their country, but also in a wider setup, which is made available by the monstrous Freemasonic fabrication ‘Euro-Mediterranean Partnership’ and the Satanic plan providing for a Union for the Mediterranean. The aforementioned silly and pathetic puppets will find it worthy to further integrate their country into the Euro-Satanic realm of villainous homosexual marriages and utmost sexualization.

Who promotes these contaminations worldwide?

Yahoo, MSN, Google and the other criminal Freemasonic – Zionist outfits, which already support El Baradei, Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes!

In parallel, increased agricultural imports and boosted consumerism (which translates to further imports) will unquestionably drive Egypt to its knees, and the bankruptcy will come in less than 2 years. A bankrupt Egypt will become the perfect tool at the hands of America, Europe, Israel, and their vicious, heinous and ominous ally, the colonial state of Abyssinia, e.g. Fake Ethiopia. At that time, the Nile waters conspiracy of the Freemasonic – Zionist gangsters will come to surface in all its dimensions to further function as an extra lever of pressure and ensure the final decomposition of the country.

If things reach that level, the outright majority of the Egyptian people, even if they manage to kick the so-called democratic, liberal – secular government out, will not have the chance to outmaneuver the evil plans against Egypt that the Freemasons and the Zionists have long prepared against Egypt and the valley of the Nile in general – including Sudan. That’s why it is important to keep today’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition under control, out of power, and in ramshackle, before they succeed to obtain power in Egypt.

This is the key point: beyond plans of political subversion of Egypt, beyond programs of social-behavioral and cultural disintegration of Egypt, and beyond projects of economic destruction and disastrous bankruptcy of Egypt, the Western colonial countries that are the international politics’ tools of the Freemasons attempt to harm the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.

VII. Major threats against Egypt’s national integrity

What are the major points of the Freemasonic – Zionist projects in this regard?

– Creation of troubles in Port Said, Suez, and the Sinai – serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo and the Zionist state that will find itself ‘threatened’, and this will serve as ‘venue’ for Israel to interfere.

– Creation of troubles in Halaib. Serious deterioration of the relations between Khartoum and Cairo

– Nile water troubles. Serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo, Khartoum and the Anti-African, colonial state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) because of the construction of two dams (one in Atbara River and another in the Blue Nile); with strong US-European-Israeli support, the barbaric and genocidal state of Abyssinia will declare earlier treaties about the Nile water flow as not binding.

– Serious change in the Northeast African balance of power, with Khartoum getting greater Nile share in exchange with the formation of an anti-Egyptian alliance with the Neo-Nazi state of Abyssinia

– Advanced level of diffusion of separatist ideas among Nubians in both Egypt and the Sudan

– Without Egypt’s involvement, Sudan will soon disintegrate, with first Darfur and then Kordofan seceding. Longer the US, UK, French and Abyssinian embassies stay in Khartoum, closer the end of Sudan comes. Then, the Bejas in the East (Port Sudan, Sawakin and Kessala) will revolt and demand independence. This event will affect Egypt greatly, because the Bejas will demand for them the Halaib triangle and extra territory in Egypt’ extreme Southeast (Ras Banas, Berenice) that is inhabited by Egypt’s Beja minority.

– Becoming a landlocked country, Sudan will implode; the Nubians in the North will declare independence. This development will also affect Egypt, as big money is now being diffused to promote themes and motives of the Nubian political mythology.

VIII. Focus on the world’s most Anti-Egyptian state: the genocidal state of Fake Ethiopia

At this point, I intend to expand more on this subject; the racist, Satanic regime that controls Abyssinia is the world’s most inhuman, barbaric and criminal regime. More genocides have been perpetrated in the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia over the past 150 years than in the rest of the world.

Who is responsible for this?

The Satanic directorate of Freemasonry, and the subservient countries France, England, America and Israel that in different moments supported those who have been in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

Who are in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)?

Two Semitic tribes that originate from Yemen, and crossed to Africa in repeated waves, before ca. 2500 years, e.g. the Amhara and the Tigray

Together, the Amhara and the Tigray constitute ca. 31% of the country’s total population; they basically live in the north of the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia, close to the borders with Eritrea and Sudan. The cruelest among them resettled in the Occupied Oromo capital city Finfinne (that bears officially the genocidal name ‘Addis Ababa’, a name given by the inhuman and Anti-African invaders), which is located at the colonial state’s geographical center, which is in reality the territory of Occupied Oromia. However, many Amhara and fewer Tigray are Muslims, whereas the rest are fake Christians (called Tewahedo – Monophysitic). It is in fact the Tewahedo fake Christian Amhara and Tigray who control the country of Fake Ethiopia. They are not more than 17% of the country’s total population.

The historical area of Abyssinia, prior to the Freemasonry-promoted expansion, was very small – less than half of Egypt’s Delta. It is a mountainous, arid territory. There was located the Amharas’ and Tigrays’ small and barbaric kingdom that was disdained by all Muslims across Eastern Africa after it was formed, around 700 years ago (1270).

Only after 1850, with the systematic and multifaceted support of the English and the French colonials, i.e. the servile tools of the global Freemasonic policy, the useless and tiny Abyssinian kingdom started expanding at the detriment of many great African kingdoms, notably those of the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Afars, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Agaws, the Somalis of Ogaden, and others.

How the Freemasonic gangsters of England and France helped the barbaric, incestuous, and inhuman tribes of Amhara and Tigray?

a) The English and the French colonials sold plenty of guns to them, and encouraged them to make war on the rest.

b) They managed to block any arms sales to the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Somalis of Ogaden, and the rest, and

c) At the time England and France continued their Anti-African colonial wars in Sudan under the filthy and fallacious pretext ‘Abolition of slavery’, the two criminal states calmly allowed the Abyssinians to make a very profitable business by selling slaves and buying guns – to use them in the genocides that they were encouraged by the English and the French diplomats and military to perpetrate, and which they provenly perpetrated. Only the aforementioned truth is enough to show how vicious, duplicitous and evil are the gangsters who impersonate the diplomats, the agents, the scholars and the statesmen of England and France, and who are Freemasons in their majority.

After forming their colonial state (over the period 1840 – 1955), the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians preserved their monstrous country, Fake Ethiopia, through continuous, multileveled genocides that involved massacres of dozens of millions of subjugated people – and this is something that the Freemasonry-controlled newspapers of France, England, America, Canada, Australia, etc. have never mentioned, whereas the criminal, freemasonic TV channels of falsehood, BBC, CNN, NBC, Al Jazira, Arabiya, and their likes have kept, even until now, under silence.

The filthy political mythology and the related literature of the Amhara-Tigray Abyssinian tyranny is essential for every Egyptian to read, study, analyze, and assess as imminent and lethal threat against Egypt.

While infiltrating other countries, the Abyssinians methodically promote the culture of their barbaric, incestuous and filthy tribe that knows no notion of real faith, integrity, family, honesty, humanity, and honor. There is practically speaking no marriage among them; every man and woman can live together and separate at any time; they practice black magic extensively; many of them belong to a filthy group called Rastafarians who believe that the former bogus-king Haile Selassie was the Messiah and Jesus Christ reincarnate!!! They have many filthy practices that they keep secret; they are all addicted to drugs (cannabis in particular), but they are recognizable through their dreadlocks and their favorite colors yellow, green and red that are those of the flag of Fake Ethiopia.

Dreadlocks and the Abyssinian flag’s colours have recently infiltrated Egypt, and it would be crucial for the Islamic movements of Egypt to prohibit them, persecute the users, identify the traces of their contacts, and finally cut every connection these users may have with countries abroad.

Rastafarians appear to be a small religious group that first started in Jamaica (there are now ca. 100000 Rastafari and affiliates in the island nation) and still has few members scattered across the world (ca. 1 million people, mainly in Abyssinia); however, the reality is different. The Rastafarians as an instrumental Satanic sect; they defame the main historical religions of the world, like Islam, Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, and they serve locally as substitute to the fake Tewahedo Christianity of Abyssinia, and globally as support to the Freemasonic religious formations of Protestant Christianity (another heretical group) and Zionist Judaism (a vicious and villainous deviation from Orthodox Judaism). They are greatly involved in politics, and in this case, a good example is offered by the criminal gangster Jendayi Frazer, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, heading the Bureau of African Affairs, who was a key Rastafarian and promoted Anti-African policies and strategies of the worst sort.

Rastafarians manage to deceitfully attract sympathy as African originals whereas their faith is the absolute rejection of all African traditions and religions; using typical Marketing methods, they make of the show business (notably Bob Marley, and the entire reggae music, but not only) a key tool of their infiltration policy among unsuspicious populations across the world – and more particularly among targeted countries, like Sudan and Egypt. But, look at the following:

Rastafarians’ god is named Jah – just the first half of the Hebrew god Jahveh.

Rastafarians accept the Trinity as revealed in Haile Selassie pre-ascension name Ras Tafari (that they call the ‘power of the trinity’).

The perfect world or the Paradise for the materialist, godless Rastafarians is already called Zion! They believe they will achieve to live in it, if their barbaric and antihuman contamination is spread over sizeable parts of Eastern Africa and subsequently proclaimed as state religion.

Rastafarians accept as holy an execrable, filthy trash, i.e. a purely Satanic text of false historical claims that is called ‘Kebra Negast’. In it, the world’s history is viciously altered to fit Abyssinian – Zionist interests to the detriment of all – Christianity, Islam, Africa and the Mankind in general. Kebra Negast is an incredible forgery written by villainous and paranoid authors under fully demonic guidance. One can easily describe it as Satan’s bible.

In Kebra Negast and in other execrable texts of theirs, Rastafarians attempted to usurp the tradition of Queen of Sheba (Balqis) from Yemen. They have fallaciously associated it with Abyssinia, and they subsequently added tons of lies in order to justify their top target, namely the control of Sudan and Egypt by them, and the split of both countries’ territory between Israel and Fake Ethiopia.

Part of the vicious Rastafarian plan of Eastern Africa’s pornification, social decomposition, and moral degradation was the usurpation of the fair name of Ethiopia, which was an Ancient Greek and Latin name for the Kushitic state of Sudan immediately south of Egypt, with capital first at Karima (then Napata – for the period 800 – 500 BCE) and then at Bagrawiyah (then Meroe – for the period 450 BCE – 370 CE). The Ancient Sudanese state, which was named Ethiopia, was culturally – ethnically – linguistically unrelated to the Axumite Abyssinia which sheltered the first Yemenites who crossed to Africa mainly in the second half of the first millennium BCE, and who happen to be the ancestors of the Amhara and Tigray, the cruel tribes that rule tyrannically the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia. In no case, can Abyssinia be called Ethiopia, and this should be the basis of a Sudanese – Egyptian alliance against Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia). The only country that could rightfully be named ‘Ethiopia’ is Sudan.

Rastafarians deliberately call the entire Africa ‘Zion’!

Actually, the rest of the world is their enemy, and they call it ‘Babylon’ in a fraudulent effort of fallacious utilization of the old defeat of Judah and exile at Babylonia. But this makes the entire Islam part of Babylon, which is sheer distortion of both, historical truth and political reality.

In another forged statement of theirs, Rastafarians claim that they are the real Children of Israel!

The link between Fake Ethiopia and Israel is highlighted by the use of the title ‘Lion of Judah’ and by Rastafarians’ villainous goal to repatriate to their fictional Mount Zion. Even in Jamaica, they dirtied a place by naming it ‘Mount Zion’. Here one can remember the wicked songs by Bob Marley ‘Zion Train’ and ‘Iron Lion Zion’; it is to be remembered that in a degenerate manner, and contrarily to Islam’s moral orders and Egypt’s national interests, Amr Diab sang in Arabic few hits by Bob Marley.

In an insolence proportioned to their wickedness, Rastafarians propagate that Amharic will be the language of the Paradise, reject the idea that the heaven is in the sky, and place their fake paradise in Abyssinia. They are absolutely materialist in their theory because they believe that in the Hereafter, humans will have their physical bodies. This is an alarming warning to all the nations of Eastern Africa, either independent or subjugated: Rastafarians’ fake paradise will be the African nations’ ultimate hell.

Little matters whether the Rastafarians have the tacit support of the Freemasonic masters of the present global order. It the Rastafarians manage to achieve their plans, this will achieved only because of the African nations’ lack of foresightedness.

Quite ludicrously but also quite meaningfully, one group of Rastafarians is called ‘Twelve Tribes of Israel’.

Rastafarians justify their addiction to cannabis by referring and altering verses of the Hebrew Bible, and the Revelation; they also justify their dreadlocks in the same manner.

Finally, by supporting Afro-centrism (which should be top task for Egypt’s and Sudan’s academia, diplomats and intellectuals), they appear as the champions of Africa, exactly as the Freemasons want them to be, thus keeping Egypt and Sudan at the level of the academically, intellectually and educationally colonized countries that keep disastrously propagating the fake Greco-Romano-centric dogma of History that the French and English Freemasons and so-called Hellenists produced in the first place.

IX. Colonial academic falsehood promoted by both, Mubarak’s regime and the liberal – secular opposition, at the detriment of Egypt’s national interests

It is therefore time for us to examine now how much Mubarak’s academic – educational system damaged Egypt’s interests, through the promotion of colonial academic falsehood, and how the same will happen if Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition rises in power.

Ever since Napoleon and his Savants of the Institut de France arrived in Egypt, and following Egypt’s real secession from the Ottoman Empire and submission to effective colonial and Anti-Islamic rule which was nominally executed by the Freemason Muhammad Ali, Napoleon’s disciple in Satanism, Egypt’s educational and academic institutions were progressively adjusted and fully attuned to Euro-centric, racist, colonial historical falsehood.

This is a complete system of historical forgery that presents the Ancient Greek civilization as central to the entire world, exaggerates the importance of Greek and Roman presence in Africa, and places in Ancient Greece and Rome the origin of the modern European civilization. At the same time, the said system passes under silence the vast, enduring, determinant, multifaceted, and overwhelming impact of the ancient Oriental and African civilizations (notably the Egyptian civilization) on the formation of Ancient Greece, Rome, Christian Europe, and Modern Europe. Critical historical developments and processes, such as the extensive diffusion of Oriental, Persian, and Egyptian cultures and religions across the Roman Empire, are kept unknown to the average people (although experts are fully aware of the reality).

The historical forgery of Greco-Romano-centrism portrays the History of the Orient, Asia, and Africa as lower, marginal and unimportant if compared to the past of the West.

But by fully diffusing and duly imposing this false system across Egypt, the successive Egyptian administrations of the 19th and the 20th century, as well as the westernized Egyptian academia gave a disastrous picture of Egypt to other African and Oriental nations. They looked to them as totally subservient to the European and the American colonials. This development generated an antipathy for Egypt among Africans, and this feeling was progressively transformed into contempt and hatred, following the ceaseless Anti-Egyptian propaganda of the heinous diplomats and agents of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).

Contrarily, by allying itself with countries, universities and movements that promote Afro-centrism, Fake Ethiopia tries to gain points and influence among unsuspicious, gullible Africans. This situation will continue, because Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition, if it rises in power, will be deceived by their own masters and promoters, who will first ask them to continue the same academic –educational falsehood that harms Egypt, Africa and Islam altogether.

At the political level, if Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition rises to power, their present supporters will deploy a great effort to minimize to the secular – liberal government of Egypt the possible damage Fake Ethiopia can do to Egypt, thus offering valuable time to the cruel Neo-Nazi rulers of Addis Ababa to advance in their plans, particularly at the level of the Nile water flow. Being cheated by their own promoters, Egypt’s liberal – secular parties and politicians constitute certainly the greatest internal danger for the country and all the Egyptians.

By being deeply anchored in Western and pro-Western schemes, ideas, theories and practices, the leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition clearly demonstrate that they did not make a momentary alliance, but they are totally tied to Western guidance, and this proves that they will never have the ability to properly establish the always necessary criticism of the West. These political figures will not be able to distinguish between West’s interests and Egypt’s interests, and much less effectively defend their country at all levels.

Where does all this bring us?

It is clear that a liberal – secular government in Egypt will speed up the process of Egypt’s disintegration at all levels, national included.

X. Another dimension of threats to Egypt’s national integrity and physical existence

One has to complete the picture; the secession of the Sinai, the separation of Halaib and Egypt’s southeastern confines to serve the project providing for a Red Sea Beja state, and the independence of Nubia may look minimal or even unimportant, if one examines details through an unconventional viewpoint.

Even an eventual division of Egypt into two countries, Muslim and Christian, can be attested in the global mass media, and in some US-based Coptic portals. At this point, I have to stress that this threat should be taken seriously by every Egyptian; it is not a joke. Wherever there is a discussion about an eventual development that looks incredible from a first viewpoint, one must be sure that behind the discussion, there are hidden and real interests and that a substantive profit is anticipated by those who push toward this eventual development. In addition, one must take into consideration that projects that may have advanced very slowly for decades can suddenly get accelerated and be implemented within an unexpectedly short time.

But unfortunately, for today’s Egypt, evil circles have planned worse than the aforementioned; and this is even more serious, because it does concern merely the national integrity of the country, but its very physical existence! It relates to the very existence of the valley of the Nile, as it has always been known through millennia.

Before going ahead, I must point out that I don’t consider the expression of a threat as an ominous event that already took place. No! A threat is just a threat; not an event. But it can be materialized. And there lies the importance of a threat. If the threat, its sources, its factors, and its execution are identified, the threat can be addressed and averted; and in this case, the threat is not really dangerous anymore. But if the threat is not identified, if the execution of a threat is a matter of catastrophic oversight, and if the threatened entity continues living as if nothing happens, then we have to be sure that the threat will be materialized and the threatened entity will be submitted to its fate.

What is this threat about?

– A strange threat that is repeated in the mouths, in the speeches, in the texts of the worst enemies of Egypt

– A strange threat that is related with apocalyptic texts, with holy books of different peoples, notably the Old Testament

– A strange threat that some consider as prophesied long ago but able to be materialized only after the 1960s, because of the erection of a huge construction project – the demolition of which would entail the physical annihilation of the valley of the Nile

– A strange threat that can be materialized only now, because of the existence of advanced high technology – of which only few people today have a vague idea

– A strange threat that brings forth the physical annihilation of the land in an unprecedented way

This is certainly something that the people, the leading organizations, and the government of the threatened country must take very seriously, and fast react by proper, concerted action.

I should however add that this threat is nothing new; it was widely discussed among various circles in the past, although these discussions were never highlighted by the global mass media. At the time, prophecy experts and analysts or other theoreticians involved did not have it easy to explain the way by which the said prophecy would be materialized in the future. However, more recently, after 1965, several biblical interpreters came up with fresh, and more illuminated explanations.

Customarily, the threat is portrayed as a statement originally included in the holy book of the Ancient Hebrews, the Torah (Old Testament). But there have been plenty of geo-strategic implications, nationalistic attachments, side views, recent foretelling, odd oracles, political visions, and chauvinistic omen that further illustrated different approaches to and viewpoints of the statement. The subject may be vast to expand thereon here, but I intend to show key political ramifications.

A relatively recent presage was mentioned in the narrative of the Russian Military Officer, Explorer, and Orthodox Monk Alexander Bulatovich who was the tsar’s envoy to Abyssinia during the years 1896 – 1899 and carried out there many excursions, observations and explorations that he later wrote down in a voluminous opus. The narrative is included in the chapter about the family of the emperor.

As a matter of fact, this chapter is of great importance today for the diplomatic and national security services of Egypt and the Sudan, because the text reveals in detail what exactly the filthy, rancorous and wicked Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians have so well and so long tried to hide.

This chapter reveals that the regime, the elites and the upper classes of these incestuous and barbarous tribes, namely the Amhara and the Tigray, have persistently acted after a secret program (that they call “prophecy” because of their sick, abnormal and degenerate mind) to destroy Egypt and Sudan, and thus expand their cannibalistic tyranny throughout East Africa. Their ulcerous antipathy of Islam, their Anti-Coptic odium, their Anti-African hatred, their complete devotion to Satan, who is the real master of their incestuous and lawless society, and their desire to expand their rule throughout Eastern Africa is highlighted in the following excerpt:

“In one of the prophecies of Raguil to Atye Zadyngylyu (he received revelations in his sleep and then wrote them down), it is said that a king from the north will be with a king of Ethiopia one in spirit and one in heart. In another prophecy of Angel Auriel to Sahle Selassie, it is said that a king of the north and of Jerusalem will meet with a king of Ethiopia in Mysyr (Egypt) and will conquer Egypt. After this, they will divide among them all the land”.

It is essential to bring in mind that at the time this text was written there was no state of Israel and the entire territory of Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Caliphate.

The above text plainly testifies to the monstrous and inhuman nature of the genocidal Abyssinian state. Taking into consideration that the text was not written by a scientific explorer or a political philosopher but by the last tsar’s envoy, who had also the task to offer an alternative to the Abyssinian – English relations and increase Russia’s influence in the area, one can realize through the lines of the text the extent of the inhumanity and the evil deeds perpetrated by the monsters of Abyssinia over the invaded and occupied lands. Of course, these deeds were carried out with the approval of the English and the French, i.e. the colonial powers that never regretted, never repented, never apologized for their African Holocaust. These countries and their accomplices (euphemistically called allies) are the real supporters of the Egyptian secular- liberal opposition, and their support is only due to the continuation and advancement of the same murderous policies of which the present Egyptian secular- liberal opposition will be the next victim if they happen to rise in power.

The evil eschatological dreams of Greater Ethiopia threaten not only Egypt and the Sudan, but also other neighboring countries, such as Somalia and Eritrea, and more than the rest, all the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), e.g. the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Kaffas, the Shekachos, the Hadiyas, the Kambaatas, the Agaws, the Wolayitas and others, who also fight for their independence.

The diplomats and the administrators, the academia and the intellectuals, the imams and the priests, the deputies and the ministers of the aforementioned countries, and the liberation leaders and activists of the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia must study and fully understand the insightful documentation available in this book, which was published by the Russian explorer before 110 years. Only then, they will be able to properly assess the detrimental dangers that are dangling over their heads.

In and by itself, Alexander Bulatovich’s With the Armies of Menelik constitutes good reason for the entire world, and more specifically for all African and Islamic countries, to be greatly preoccupied with the source of every regional trouble and instability: the villainous Amhara and Tigray (Tewahedo) Monophysitic Abyssinian tribes that have perpetrated the world’s most abhorrent genocides, ruling tyrannically over the lands they invaded and over the nations they subjugated since the middle of the 19th century.

The fact that the uncivilized Abyssinians have lawlessly and shamelessly usurped the name of Ethiopia, which historically belongs to Sudan and to the Kushitic African nations, like the Oromos, the Sidamas, and the Afars, is only the top of the iceberg. They did so in order to falsely claim what is not theirs, and what has never been theirs: the Nile and the adjacent lands that the great river crosses.

The developments that are planned to trigger the above discussed ‘division’ of the territories of Egypt and Sudan (then named Mysyr) between Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and Israel involve something that was unknown in 1896: the destruction of Aswan High Dam and the elimination of life from the valley of the Nile and the Delta region for a period of 40 years.

Many modern preachers who belong to fake Christian denominations fabricated by the Freemasons, like the Evangelicals, often speak about this point, referring to the Old Testament and analyzing selected excerpts. What is described in those excerpts as a potentiality of divine punishment administered to the old times’ polytheistic wickedness is now shamelessly misinterpreted as pending punishment ‘due’ to modern times’ Egyptian Anti-Israelism, which in fact is a mere Anti-Ashkenazism or Anti-Khazarianism.

This effort of misinterpretation shows that cruel regimes’ and gangsters’ political wishes are easily linked to Biblical excerpts, as the evilness of the devious necessarily involves usurpation of God’s words. This illuminates the Satanic nature of the Freemasonry, and of their evil outfits, namely the fake Christian Tewahedo Monophysitic Abyssinians, the fake Jewish Zionists (Ashkenazi Khazarians), and the radically pro-Zionist, fake Christian Evangelicals.

The subject is highly dangerous for Egypt as it is linked to the entire issue of Nile River water dispute between Egypt, Sudan and Abyssinia. This only underscores the reality that longer the secular – liberal opposition is allowed to act in Egypt, fewer will be the chances of the Egyptian people to get plain information, assess the existing threats, and safely and timely take action. The secular – liberal opposition has become the perfect Freemasonic tool of destruction of the Nile valley, as it has only engulfed Egypt into internal strives that prevent the country from preparing for a faceoff with Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and from outmaneuvering the aforementioned evil Freemasonic plot.

The Alexandria Crime Highlights Al Qaeda’s Identity as a Freemasonic Fabrication

Life continued peaceful in Alexandria today, Sunday, 2nd of January 2011; certainly, there was a widespread feeling of sadness for the undeserved end of life of ca. 25 people and for the injury caused to ca. 80 people. There was also a feeling of indignation for the attempt itself, and the real perpetrators, who are hidden behind the fake name of Al Qaeda.

 

Few logical people are left to believe that Al Qaeda exists and that its possible head, Ossama Bin Laden, is alive. Even fewer believe that various real persons arrested every now and then, here and there, have had any possible affiliation or relation with the said ghost organization that serves exclusively the implementation of the evil and Satanic plans of the perverse Secret Society: the realm of the Freemasonry and all its appendices and annexes.

 

Ossama Bin Laden is dead; he was assassinated while treated in a hospital in Pakistan in December 2001. Benazir Bhutto said in a public interview the name of Ossama Bin Laden’s assassin, and this interview, which may have been one of the reasons she was assassinated in her turn, is publicly available in the Internet; the video is brief (https://ok.ru/video/1908505512536https://vk.com/video429864789_456239126https://www.bitchute.com/video/s347x5EH6m7W/), but the key point is between 6:00 and 6:30.

 

Ayman Zawahri and several other key figures of the mythology ‘Al Qaeda’ are arrested, imprisoned and kept under high surveillance in America; they have been specifically treated in mind control laboratories, whereby brain implants (also known as neural implants) have been attached to their brains’ cortex. They therefore have been completely incapacitated as independent and normal human beings, and perfectly utilized as unconscious actors – tools of the Armageddon-scale destruction that the Freemasonic gangsters viciously intend to administer to the entire Islamic World. Their brain implants do comprise interfaces between their neural systems and computer chips.

 

More analytical descriptions of the techniques involved can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Silent_Talk#Synthetic_telepathy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocorticography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultured_neuronal_networks
http://www.bci-award.com/ (notice the logo!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Manuel_Rodriguez_Delgado
http://www.wireheading.com/jose-delgado.html
http://www.biotele.com/Delgado.htm
http://www.biotele.com/

 

The subject may be vast, and is definitely out of the scope of the present article. I want however to state at this point that I am in possession of a vast literature on the subject, and more importantly, of equally vast mails sent to me by a Somali victim of the aforementioned practices, a brave Muslim who managed to escape and disclose to me – in mails and in person – the utilization of similar techniques against Somalia over the past 20 years. This does not take me by surprise because I have long been fully aware of the targeted nations, and of the reasons for the selection of several countries as targets.

 

The Al Qaeda Homunculi

 

In fact, Ayman Zawahri and some of his former colleagues, who share the same destiny, have been literally transformed into homunculi. This is not strange, if one takes into consideration the developments that have taken place in the Western World over the past 500 years, and the specific references to the concept of homunculus that have been made by leading Western minds from Paracelsus and Goethe to Umberto Eco – all Freemasons.

 

Here is available basic literature on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homunculus

 

The use of the aforementioned techniques pertains to geo-strategic targets of the CIA, the British Intelligence, and the Mossad that all act in full concertation. The said secret services, along with those of several other countries, notably France, Belgium, Holland, Spain, Canada and Australia, have been meticulously working over the past two decades in order to implement their Atlantic choices of a unipolar world revolving around North America and Western Europe. This appears to be the primary policy of the said administrations that have always managed to take a common stance toward global issues, and when this was impossible, to cover and contain possible variances and discords.

 

Acting in full control of their deceived societies that are almost completely unaware of the realities and the methods of the existing governmental system in the West, these administrations are subservient to their hidden masters, the top of the Freemasonic hierarchy, the few members of the world’s elite who in the darkness of their Satanic rituals perpetrate one after the other the crimes that spread disaster worldwide. Puppet governments offer these evil gangsters the quasi-absolute control of the socioeconomic and political developments.

 

As the masses of the materialistic realms of North America and Western Europe are being fooled about an otherwise nonexistent ‘democracy’ and an ill-conceived prosperity, the hidden masters of the undemocratic Western societies implement their criminal agenda against all the rest, primarily targeting Islam, Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, Russia, and China.

 

For each target, the means and the tools differ, although they are interconnected to some extent; the fabricated Islamic Terror myth serves for the destruction of the Islamic World, but at the same time, it helps keep Russia busy in Daghestan, Chechnya, and even in Moscow. How nice!

 

Contrarily to what deceived people worldwide assume, Islamic terrorists do not exist. Radicals and Muslim integrists or integralists certainly exist, but integrists they do not constitute an exclusive ‘privilege’ of the Islamic World, because there are more radicals and extremists among the US Evangelicals than among the world’s 1.7 billion of Muslims.

 

The fabrication of Al Qaeda dates back in the 80s; its story is typical for a secret services agent to write and diffuse. No mainstream mass media worldwide are however allowed to reject the official version, which is composed by the CIA, the British Intelligence and the Mossad, and typified in the ridiculous entry of the Freemasonry-controlled Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda). Nazi propagandists in Germany, back in the 1930s, would have felt like uneducated schoolchildren, if they had compared their poor writings to the systematized falsehood of Wikipedia.

 

Every mainstream publication on Al Qaeda represents an incredible number of far-fetched assumptions, unprecedented innuendos, and distorted pieces of unconnected events. By intermingling real events with factoids, and by adding to the mixture a great number of prefabricated comments, misinterpreted occurrences, and unverified circumstances, the front office for Al Qaeda (set up by the CIA, the British Intelligence and the Mossad) diffuses the falsehood that they want the entire world to believe – and be frightened of.

 

The back office for Al Qaeda is established out of diverse hospitals, concentration camps, special prisons, institutes of foreign languages, fake medresas (religious schools), and high security laboratories whereby multiple activities are planned as per governmental and extra-governmental orders; there and under full secrecy, factoids are prepared, agents are educated and guided, and fake video tapes are carefully filmed.

 

There have been more than ten look-alike doubles of Ossama Bin Laden, and there are currently more than five look-alike doubles of Ayman Zawahri, although the real homunculus of Ayman Zawahri still exists – along with many others (more than 500 persons!) -, being thus one of the most horridly tortured people in the world (via the aforementioned methods). In fact, he is not himself anymore, but a sheer instrument.

 

The Political and Geo-strategic Use of the Ghost Organization of Al Qaeda

 

The aforementioned brief sketch, which is the only to plainly interpret the parody of theater staged in front of the eyes of the deceived Mankind over the past two decades, makes clear that the intentions are vicious and indicates that the final target is of disproportionate, exorbitant scale.

 

This may sound incredible to simple, average people whose only ambition is to survive, but they would make a good present to themselves by remembering that powerful and vast empires (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Caliphate, Tsarist Russia, Germany, China, Japan, Spain and Ancien Régime France) collapsed due to the same Freemasonic plan providing for Satan’s global predominance.

 

The ghost organization Al Qaeda was geared to

 

1. Cover the Western regimes’ direct effort to bring chaos, discord, wars and ultimate disaster to the Islamic World

 

2. Confuse the moderate governments of Islamic countries by fully engaging them in a struggle against unknown and, more importantly, nonexistent enemies

 

3. Enter into indirect war with non moderate governments of Islamic countries (Iran)

 

4. Generate internal developments through triggered, stage-maneuvered ‘incidents’ (this was precisely the Alexandria Crime)

 

5. Feed the Freemasonry-controlled, criminal mainstream mass media with factoids, which -through apt and subtle effort of misinformation- shape a totally wrong global public opinion about a subject. The Financial Times, a Freemasonic trash, gave a perfect example of filthy, fallacious and criminal journalism, specifying in an absolutely misplaced title that “Bomb blast in Egypt highlights divisions” (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1e4d96bc-159f-11e0-b371-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=f39ffd26-4bb2-11da-997b-0000779e2340.html#axzz19ssek6fw). Nothing can be more vicious a statement on this occurrence than this; in fact, the bomb blast in Egypt highlighted Egypt’s solid national unity and perseverance. Anger was certainly expressed by some hot-blooded people; but no one accepted that a division exists or can ever be in Egypt.

 

If an act is perpetrated and is immediately reported and focused-on by a mass media establishment known for its Freemasonic affiliation, one can be sure that it was a matter of stage-maneuvering. More exaggeration is offered in the interpretation, stronger the Freemasonic decision is to stage-manage developments.

 

When the act is attributed to Al Qaeda, you can be sure that it serves a particular Freemasonic policy. Even worse, if the factoid takes place on a day that has a particular numeric value or bears a symbolic meaning. The New Year’s Day – for the Alexandria Crime – highlights the Freemasonic agenda for the year, and indicates that there will be an evil focus placed on the country where the incident takes place. (Noted exaggeration:http://fr.news.yahoo.com/64/20110102/twl-attentat-d-alexandrie-5-000-personne-acb1c83.html)

 

The Freemasonic Agenda for North-Eastern Africa and the Middle East

 

“Totus mundus agit histrionem” (the whole world is a playhouse): this motto was displayed above the main entrance of the Globe Theater, a Freemasonic institution in 16th century England. Next to it, the entrance featured the figure of Hercules carrying a globe, an indication of the polytheistic ideas that permeated the paranoid doctrine of the secret society of Crime and Incest: either you call it Freemasonry or Mother of the Harlots, according to the Christian Book of the Revelation, it is the same.

 

The aforementioned motto was slightly modified and incorporated in the William Shakespeare’s play As You Like It – “All the world’s a stage” which was performed at the Freemasonic theater. William Shakespeare was a Freemason.

 

Secretively manipulating people and developments, the Freemasons believe that they have entrapped the whole world, turning the outright majority of innocent people into playthings with which they and their pseudo-god, Satan, can do whatever they like. It goes without saying that their “playthings” can never have any value for them, either they consist in political parties, international organizations, universities, corporations and states or they are mere human beings. The evilness of utilization automatically eliminates any value of the “plaything”, revealing therefore the true nature of the Freemasonic priesthood of Satan.

 

What follows is a general outline of the basic axes of the Freemasonic agenda for the said region.

 

Islamic radicalization of Turkey, collapse of the secular establishment

 

Secession of South Sudan

 

Israeli – US attack against Iran, grave nuclear explosions

 

Chaos in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon

 

Complete destabilization of Egypt

 

Chaos in Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Somalia

 

Fabrication of an African pro-Israel state incorporating South Sudan, Uganda, and parts of Kenya, geared to receive mass exodus from a destabilized Israel

 

Generalized war in the Middle East with catastrophic result for Israel, US, NATO and the Middle Eastern states, Damascus destroyed, Israel lethally destabilized

 

Balkan wars with Serbia, Bulgaria, and Greece siding against Turkey, Albania, Macedonia, Kosovo and Bosnia, with detrimental disaster for all

 

War between Egypt and Sudan against Abyssinia (fake Ethiopia) with detrimental losses for all

 

Caucasus war with Russia and Armenia siding against Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan and parts of a decomposed Iran

 

Islamic rebellion throughout Europe with focus in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Belgium, Holland and England

 

Secession of Kurdistan from Turkey, Iraq and Iran, and formation of a unified Kurdistan under supervision of the CIA, the British Intelligence, and the Mossad

 

Chaos in Europe, destruction of Vatican, rise of a dictatorship throughout Europe

 

Implosion of Pakistan, secession of Baluchistan, Pachtunistan, war with India

 

Rise of a Shia state in Arabia and Yemen, and fratricidal wars between Shia and Sunni Muslims throughout the Asiatic part of the Middle East, rise of a Sunni Caliphate at Medina

 

Extreme natural disasters, HAARP-triggered earthquakes devastate Northeast Africa, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia, and Indonesia

 

Diffusion of manmade diseases in China, India, Africa, Latin America – dozens of millions of dead

 

Second Middle Eastern war with Russian participation, calamitous result for Israel, and international involvement for final arrangement of peace

 

Evacuation of Zionist Israelis to Africa (South Sudan – Uganda – Kenya) and relocation of millions of English, French, Belgians and Dutch in the re-mapped area of Palestine; remaining Jews adhere to Extremist, Evangelical “Christianity”

 

Because the last point is imperative for the Freemasonic agenda, you hear now the dog of Israeli foreign minister Lieberman saying that “peace is impossible”.

 

Conclusion

 

One may simply ask why all this?

 

The answer is simple: far more has happened over the past 212 years, ever since Freemason Napoleon landed in Alexandria and propagated the evildoings of the Freemasons in the wider area.

An in-depth analysis may need a vast publication. In reality, the truth is simple, and always accessible to all. The ‘key’ is the Freemasonic paranoia with theater and stage. One must focus on what the Freemasons have been staging, the core of their play, and the frame of the performance.

 

Extending a similar approach to the developments that took place over the past 250 years in the wider region from Morocco to India, and referring to prophecies written down in ages old holy books and apocalypses, one can conceptualize the evil Freemasonic play very easily: they try to stage-manage “their own” events according to what they had earlier read, basically in Daniel and the Revelation, in order to prevent the really prophesied events from happening.

 

They fabricated states; they baptized them with fake names, in order to create their own End Times’ players – in full refutation of what the ancient prophesies heralded. Around Eastern Mediterranean and down to the Horn of Africa, there are a number of fake states whose names reflect only the Freemasonic needs for an apocalyptic, eschatological theatrical drama, not real, indigenous peoples’ needs and identities.

 

Quite unfortunately, the final act will be a totally unforeseen development; and this will conclude the case for the evil Freemasonic organization, and their fake god, the fallen archangel. The cost will be extremely high, but the Mankind will go on; without them, and without their inhuman theater for which so many died and will die.

 

Note
Picture: A cat for Ayman Zawahri – the supposed terrorist who is merely one of the CIA’s many selected Islamists who have been transformed into suitable homunculi. “Cat lifted its hind leg in response to stimulation by an electrode implanted in its brain. The cat, Delgado says, displayed no discomfort in this experiment done in the early 1950s”. (www.biotele.com/Delgado.htm) And Ayman Zawahri displays no discomfort in the ongoing practice carried out in the early 2000s.

 

——————————————————————–

 

Download the article in Word doc:

The Alexandria Crime highlights Al Qaeda’s Identity as Freemasonic fabrication