Tag Archives: Muslim Brotherhood

What Egypt needs now – Part II. An Existential Threat must be Thwarted

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

In an earlier article titled ‘What Egypt needs now – Part I, Sinai’, I suggested a series of measures that the Egyptian government must take immediately to make sure that civil order and concord will prevail in the area and nationwide. These measures are expected to thwart an existential threat against Egypt’s national integrity. The existing threat is very real and the dangers tremendous. In the present article, I will reveal covert insinuations made by a key Israeli minister, proceeding through textual analysis. These hints do not augur well for Egypt’s territorial integrity and must therefore be taken very seriously.

When Supreme Forces are pushing to Change Borders….

Bernard Lewis map

The first reactions of the Egyptian government seem good, but very limited, short-termed, and rather atrophic. Egypt must be out of the process of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations; this is true and correct for all intents and purposes. One can even say that there was no need for such carnage so that finally an Egyptian government understands that the country’s position is in Africa and not in Asia, and that any sort of involvement in Palestinian, Levantine or Asiatic troubles does not bode well for Egypt’s interests, perspectives and future.

Establishing a buffer zone is certainly a good measure, but it will bring only minimal results; the last bomb explosion was a false flag attack, and the criminal Zionist state is the only to be held responsible for this. Any sound mind can assess this reality immediately. As irrevocable conclusion, it is even corroborated by the texts and the articles of the Zionist press – if they are attentively read and scrupulously interpreted.

For the Egyptian government, accusing Hamas for the tragic incident has only one useful dimension, namely to deceive the Israelis by pretending that the Egyptian government does not believe that the responsible was ultimately the Zionist state. This dimension would certainly make sense.

However, for any Egyptian authority to truly believe that it was carried out by a Hamas unit in cooperation with local elements is tantamount to suicide. The reason for this is the fact that it was not Hamas, but Israel, and this will be proved correct, because the measures taken, if they are not accompanied by must greater and more systematic measures (like those suggested in my previous article) will fail to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Worse, if the measures I suggested in my earlier article (https://megalommatis.wordpress.com/2014/10/26/what-egypt-needs-now-part-i-sinai/) are not taken as soon as possible, Israel will take the destabilizing game deep inside Egypt, and similar tragic incidents will be reproduced in the greater Cairo area and in Upper Egypt. The reason for this is very simple; Israel has already established a highly sophisticated network of agents across the country (without most of them even knowing that they are working for the Zionist state) and, in addition, has stored in many locations across the Sinai Peninsula material that is necessary for the false flag attacks that the Mossad intends to carry out across Egypt.

It takes only a deep understanding of the Language of Falsehood (which is as real as English, Arabic, Russian and any other linguistic entity) in order to interpret correctly the Zionist ministers’, generals’, academics’ and journalists’ speeches and thus understand that Egypt is directed targeted now.

A brilliant example is offered by the filthy pig Moshe Ya’alon – who should be mercilessly lynched and literarily dismembered alive for scores of Crimes against the Mankind. The Israeli minister of Military Affairs said in a recent interview with the US-based National Public Radio (NPR) that the current borders of many Middle Eastern countries are bound to change in the future as a result of recent developments in the region.

He then went on offering his paranoid logic about the development and specifying the following: “Libya was a new creation, a Western creation as a result of World War I. Syria, Iraq, the same — artificial nation-states — and what we see now is a collapse of this Western idea,” he stated. Feeling the need to best cover his intentions, he also added the following: “We have to distinguish between countries like Egypt, with their history. Egypt will stay Egypt”.

For someone so well prepared to be the top gangster of the criminal Zionist entity (the Fake State of Israel), i.e. the minister of Military Affairs, Modern Political History is a perfectly well studied subject, and to him all the events are known in foremost accuracy.

On this occasion, a shrewd commentator expressed a great part of irony as regards Moshe Ya’alon’s interview, epitomizing the truth as per below:
“The minister did not say whether the borders of Israel, also drawn by Western powers after World War I, would change or not ” (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/24/middle-east-borders-bound-to-change-israel-minister/).

Moshe Ya’alon (born Smilansky – of Ukrainian father) fought as a reservist in the Yom Kippur war (1973) and “on October 15, 1973, his unit became the first IDF unit to cross the Suez Canal into Egypt. He continued fighting as part of the Israeli drive into the Egyptian mainland, and participated in the encirclement of the Egyptian Third Army” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moshe_Ya%27alon).

And this is Neo-Nazi gangster Ya’alon’s latest racist measure and policy:
http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/segregated-bussing-plan-for-palestinians-and-jews/

What did the Smilansky Ashkenazi Khazarian pig really say in his interview?

First, what are the ‘recent developments’ due to which borders will change across the region as per Ya’alon words? One might suggest that he refers to what happens currently in Iraq and Syria with the emergence of the Fake Caliphate. But no, this is wrong. The inner structure of his thought makes it clear that he includes Libya into this subject (‘the recent developments’); so we can safely claim that to him ‘recent developments’ is a code term for what is rather called across the global mass media as ‘Arab Spring’. So, we conclude that, when he says that ‘the recent developments’ will bring about ‘changes of borders’, Moshe Ya’alon includes Egypt, since the country was deeply affected by the Arab Spring covert operations.

But the gangster minister said much more in his interview, fully demonstrating that he views the country of the Nile as a candidate for the forthcoming border changes; in any case, ‘many’ countries are subject to this perspective, according to Ya’alon’s words.

Allusions are highly revered literary schemes in the Language of Falsehood that Zionists and Freemasons speak without the rest being able to decipher their covert messages and hints. Do you have a doubt that Moshe Ya’alon, except from being a Zionist, is also a Freemason? The picture published in the aforementioned entry of the Wikipedia (which certainly has his approval and definitely incorporates his recommendations) shows him with his Canadian and English counterparts, Rob Nicholson and Chuck Hagel, in a typically Freemasonic gesture of shaking hands (picture retrieved as of today).

Yaalon Nicholson Hagel

What is the allusion embedded in Ya’alon aforementioned interview?

He said: “Libya was a new creation, a Western creation as a result of World War I”. This is of course wrong! Totally wrong! Libya was detached from the Ottoman Empire by Italy during their 1911 war, which occurred 3 years before WW I started.

Now, if you believe that Moshe Ya’alon simply made a mistake or did not know what he was talking about, you are an idiot, and you should immediately stop reading the present text, because it will be worthless to you.

So, Libya was not ‘a Western creation as a result of World War I’.

This means that when Ya’alon continued saying ‘Syria, Iraq, the same — artificial nation-states — and …’, he already knew very well that Syria and Iraq were not detached from the Ottoman Empire in the ‘same’ way as Libya. Why did he make then this mistake?

A first approach may be for any interpreter and analyst to think that the Israeli minister wanted to insinuate that Libya’s borders will change pretty much like those of Syria and Iraq, which have already de facto changed due to the emergence of the Fake Caliphate.

But if this were his intention, Ya’alon would stop there. As he did not, and went on involving other countries as well, we can be sure that Libya was not the point he wanted to make.

So, in fact, establishing a wrong parallel between Libya and Syria-Iraq was not a proper mistake for Ya’alon, but it served him as an allusion.

– To what did Libya serve him as an allusion?

– Evidently to what Ya’alon would never say explicitly.

– How can we identify the object of his allusion?

– By searching for further elements in his interview namely countries that are possible candidates for border change; in this regard, Syria and Iraq are automatically excluded, because the change has already occurred in their cases.

– What further element is left in Ya’alon’s interview?

– Egypt.

However, in his interview, Ya’alon makes about Egypt an interesting juxtaposition; he says: ‘we have to distinguish between countries like Egypt, with their history. Egypt will stay Egypt’.

This appears to be in contrast with what was previously said about Syria, Iraq and Libya, namely that
1. they are ‘artificial nation-states’, and
2. in their case we see now ‘a collapse of this Western idea’.

The top rule of the Falsehood Language is ‘never to say the truth in public’; the second rule is the same said reversely, namely ‘to always say a lie in public’.

The fact that what Ya’alon says about Egypt in his interview is a lie we can understand through close examination of his words that reveal plenty of inconsistencies and inaccuracies.

What are “countries like Egypt, with their history”?

If this was said comparatively to Libya only, it would perhaps draw some importance. Libya was never the heartland of huge empires, important kingdoms or expanding caliphates. However, when countries like Syria and Iraq are involved in the discourse, the statement becomes meaningless and worthless, futile, erroneous, and therefore suspicious. Syria and Iraq have a greater historical past than Egypt.

A brief historical comparison involves the following:
1- the earlier beginning of civilization and writing in Mesopotamia – Sumer (around 300 years before Egypt),

2- the greater political – military expansion and cultural radiation of Mesopotamia – Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia (covering more than two millennia),

3- the equal importance of both lands at the times of the Seleucid and Ptolemaic empires (Alexander’s Epigones),

4- the equal importance of the two respective theological schools (Antioch in Roman Syrian and Alexandria in Roman Egypt) within Christianity, and last,

5- the far greater role for Syria and Iraq within the context of Islamic History (Damascus and Baghdad were far more influential than Cairo in any aspect).

Finally, both territories (Syria – Iraq & Egypt) became part of the Ottoman Empire at the same time (early 16th c.) and were detached in the same manner (colonial, Anglo-French detachment).

We can therefore conclude that this is totally false, and when said by a top Israeli military, it consists only in a useful lie.

The same concerns for the term used for Syria, Iraq and Libya, namely ‘a new creation’ and ‘artificial nation-states’. In fact, Libya and Egypt were fabricated in exactly the same manner: colonial interference and detachment from the Islamic Caliphate – Ottoman Empire whereto both lands belonged.

In fact, if there is a contrast among the four countries mentioned by the Israeli minister, i.e. Libya, Egypt, Syria and Iraq, we have on one side Egypt and Libya (detached during direct foreign, colonial interference / pretty much like Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti, Morocco, Aden, Oman, Emirates) and on the other side Syria and Iraq (invaded and occupied during WW I as consequence of the fact that the Ottoman Empire and England were members of opposite alliances / pretty much like Lebanon, Palestine, ‘Jordan’, Arabia, Yemen, Kuwait and Qatar).

If Libya is ‘a new creation’ (1911), so is Egypt (1798) too.

If Libya, Syria, and Iraq are ‘artificial nation-states’, so is Egypt too.

One may eventually hypothesize that the Israeli minister referred to the different ethnic-religious groups attested in the case of Syria and Iraq (Sunni, Shia, ‘Kurds’, Turkmen, Aramaeans, Yazidis and others). However, this is not attested in Libya whereby homogeneity is greater (there are only Berber-speaking and Arabic-speaking Libyans), and yet the Israeli minister categorized Libya with Syria and Iraq.

One understands how intriguing the Israeli minister can become, if one takes into consideration that ethnic-religious groups exist in Egypt as well, namely Berbers in the West, Bedouins in the Sinai (systemically called ‘Arabs’ by the Zionist state – and this is both false and fallacious), Nubians and Beja in the South, and in addition, Christians (erroneously called Copts – in fact, all Egyptians are Copts), Sunni and Shia Muslims.

So, if so many elements of Minister Ya’alon’s interview are false, what did he want to say?

The answer is simple.

It is all about an allusion that he wanted to make.

First, he made it clear that the Zionist state and the forces that support it want a definite change of borders in the Middle East. This does not concern Syria and Iraq anymore, because there border change has already occurred. In addition, Minister Ya’alon did not limit his discourse to only that area where he could eventually specify details (about ‘Kurdistan’, etc.) without however referring to other countries.

Second, he used Libya as an allusion to many aspects that characterize Egypt in the way the Zionist state views the country of the Nile (: new creation, Western creation, artificial nation-state, collapse of the underlying Western idea).

Third, he denied the truth that is hidden in the backside of his mind, by excluding Egypt from the picture. In fact, no one asked Minister Ya’alon to exclude Egypt from the picture. He could have just avoided any mention. He could have mentioned Yemen, Arabia or other countries instead, but in this case he would have not conveyed the message he wanted to convey to his Freemasonic and Zionist audiences across the Earth.

This automatically suggests that, if we want to understand him clearly, we have to conclude that he basically referred to Egypt as the next target for border change.

However, it would be a mistake to imagine that the rogue gangster who impersonates Israel’s Minister of Military Affairs is the only person to use this terminology and these figures of speech in order to convey similar messages. The Israeli is press and mass media in general are full of examples of similar insinuations and hints – on daily basis.

For their criminal interests and genocidal plans, it is only normal that they do their best to confuse the picture and mislead the Egyptian authorities. The Sinai Peninsula has become an urgent affair for the Zionist state. This is at least what the recent articles of professional liars and forgers like Elhanan Miller and Avi Issacharoff reconfirm (http://www.timesofisrael.com/egypt-suspends-hamas-israel-talks-following-sinai-attack/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=6b82096a7c-2014_10_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-6b82096a7c-54783545 and http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-woes-of-an-egyptian-churchill/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=6b82096a7c-2014_10_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-6b82096a7c-54783545).

It is therefore high time for the Egyptian administration to take all measures needed in order to totally block the Zionist infiltrators and agents out of the Sinai, and thus preserve the country’s territorial integrity.

Liberal – Secular Opposition in Egypt, their Targets, and the Freemasonic Threats for Egypt’s Future

(Public lecture given at the Gamaaeyah Ansar wa Sunnah, Aswan – Egypt, on December 14, 2012)

The confusing situation that prevails in today’s Egypt and the intensive activism of the liberal – secular opposition do not herald anything good for the country. The great majority of the Egyptians, irrespective of their faith, ideas, and political position, are deeply worried about the future of the country. But this does not bother the liberal – secular opposition at all; quite contrarily, their leaders consider it possible to benefit from it.

How trustworthy a group of political parties can be, when they disregard the worries of the outright majority of the Egyptian people? How virtuous can they be?

Disregard of the people’s worries and wishes is the typical characteristic of a dictatorship; customarily, former president Mubarak disregarded the worries and the wishes of the Egyptian people in a very great number of political and social issues.

Opposing former president Mubarak, the liberal – secular organizations that later formed the backbone of today’s opposition tried to give the impression that they are democratic, which supposedly means that they respect the expressed will of the people, the recorded votes of the people, and the articulated wishes of the majority of the people.

The impression they gave about them being democratic is absolutely false. Not only because they are not democratic. Certainly, they are very totalitarian, and the will and the wishes of the Egyptian people are not a matter of concern for them.

The reason for which Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition is not democratic is double and deeply historical.

I. Democracy: a fake, euphemistic name for a tyrannical regime

First, in real, historical terms, democracy is not a properly speaking democratic system, but a form of tyranny. The term was first established in Ancient Greece where there was no large or big state, but rather small cities-states, like in Phoenicia. In the first half of the 1st millennium BCE, each Ancient Greek state was a small kingdom, but progressively in the 6th century BCE many kingdoms were overthrown and many cities-states became either tyrannies or democracies.

At the time, tyrant meant a strong leader who controlled militarily the small state with the help of an armed group. And democracy meant a city-state that was ruled by the will not of one person, but by the will of the people (demos). Literarily speaking, ‘democracy’ means ‘the state of the people’. But how democratic was a democracy like that of Athens in the 5th century BCE?

In Athens, the majority of the population consisted of the slaves; they originated from Phrygia, Thrace, Illyria, Macedonia, Scythia, etc. As per different estimates of specialists, the slaves in Athens constituted anything between 60 and 70% of the total population. The same phenomenon occurred in the supposedly ‘democratic’ Roman Republic few centuries later. As a matter of fact, the slaves not only did not have the right to vote but were not even considered as ‘humans’. In Latin, they were called ‘res’ that is ‘things’.

Furthermore, the female population in Athens, in other so-called democratic cities-states, and in Rome, had no civil rights, and consequently women could not participate in the decision-making process of each country. Therefore, if we assume that in 5th century BCE Athens the local population constituted ca. 35% of the entire population, we realize that, practically speaking, the political affairs were controlled by half of that population, e.g. the males, which reduces the decision-makers to a mere 17-18%. But of course only adult men were accepted, and this concludes the case of the undemocratic system of rule that prevailed in Ancient Athens: the political control was in fact at the hands of no more than 10-12% of the population, i.e. the adult males of local origin. At this point, one should take into consideration the fact that foreign residents were also excluded, because ‘local origin’ in a city-state in Ancient Greece usually meant proven residence of a family in the city-state for no less than six (6) generations, which translates to ca. 150 years!

If we now refer to each political decision taken and imposed, we certainly go to an even lower figure, because in the debates that took place, there were always different / opposite opinions and suggestions expressed, and – as in the modern fake democracies – the decision reflected the political will of the majority among this small group of 10-12% of the entire local population. In other words, ca. 6-7% of the entire population decided and ‘legitimately’ imposed their decision on the rest. In many cases, the decision meant taxes, war, death or other seminal issues.

II. Ancient Greek democracy: it was not ‘democracy’, and it was not Greek.

One should also examine whether some among the Ancient Greeks really invented this political system, and if not, how it was diffused among them. There are ancient Greek texts that illuminate this point; according to substantive textual evidence, there were many Phoenicians who settled colonies in the Aegean Sea and in different parts of continental Greece, as they did in many other coastlands of the Mediterranean Sea, nad in the Atlantic coasts of Iberia and NW Africa.
In fact, it is from the sociopolitical and administrative system of the Phoenician colonies that many social groups and political parties in different Ancient Greek cities-states got this new political concept. Contrarily to the Phoenician cities-states (Tyr, Byblus, Sidon, Beirut, Arvad, etc.) that were all kingdoms, the Phoenician colonies were real democracies; most important and most famous among them was Carthage, which was founded in the year 800 BCE in the area of modern Tunis.

Carthage, like every other Phoenician and Carthaginian colony, was a democracy, because there was a general assembly of the Phoenician colons established there, and they elected the Senate, the government and the ruler. In the light of aforementioned, it is important to note that, prior to the year 600 BCE, there was not a single Ancient Greek state to be governed by a ‘democratic’ system.

III. Ancient & modern ‘democracy’: Fake political systems based on historical forgery

But why no one attributes today the origin of Democracy to the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians, and as per the prevailing opinion the system was invented by some Ancient Greeks?

This question finds its answer in another question:

Why everyone in the West considers the Ancient Greek adaptation of the Phoenician colonies’ political system as a truly ‘democratic’ system and as a real ‘state of the people’ (as the Ancient Greek word clearly denotes), whereas in the place where this term was first created, the so-called ‘democratic’ system was deeply and clearly undemocratic and anti-democratic?

The answer to both questions is one:

Those who by controlling the leading Western countries exercise an undeniable control over large parts of today’s world,
a) have prepared and diffused their own false History (and amongst others wiped out the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians),
b) have had the need to propagate an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens, and – even worse –
c) have ruled the modern Western world (and a very large part of the world through their colonies), using a similar, unrepresentative and undemocratic system: the modern pseudo-democracy.

IV. Fake western democracy and Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition

Now, where does all this take us with regard to Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

The historical reason for which Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is undemocratic and dictatorial we already explained; they ascribe themselves to an old system of ruling that is very discriminatory and absolutely totalitarian. Even the word coined to describe this system in Ancient Greece – a word that reflects not a reality but merely an Ancient Greek viewpoint of it – was quite contradictory to the historical reality and practice of that system.

But there is also political evidence testifying to the fact that Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is in reality undemocratic and dictatorial. This is the point to discuss here. The identity and the nature of the political promoters of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition do not bode well for Egypt’s future.

Who are the real fabricators, supporters, promoters and employers of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Screening the international and the Egyptian mass media, we can safely identify them; every time there is a clash between the Islamist government and the liberal – secular opposition, they lash out at the government whereas in parallel they side with the opposition, thus shockingly interfering in the political life of the country. Who are they? They are those, who ….

have managed to control today’s westernized – ‘global’ world to large extent,

have prepared and diffused their systematic, false History,

have had the need to propagate and evidently propagated an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens in order to rule the world through this bias

have ruled most of today’s world through this bias, and in the process they disseminated antihuman, evil ideas and practices, overwhelming corruption, and ultimately imposed an evil lifestyle and way of life, deprived of virtues and values, at the very antipodes of all the earlier social models and the associated cultures and civilizations throughout History.

Who are the fabricators of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Here we have to deal with several layers of political corruption, financial dependence, and evil backstage practices.

Those who fabricated today’s various opposition groups that did not exist before 3 years, with the exception of the Wafd party, the socialists and the communists, are:

International NGOs,

International organizations,

Western governments,

Financial groups of power, banks and funds,

Research institutes and political lobbies,

And, behind them all, a secret company that controls everything behind the political stage.

What is this company and what are their plans?

With its roots retraced back to the Antiquity and with its origins going back to the 3rd millennium BCE, this secret company is ‘recently’ known under the name of Freemasonry, and they have been known under this name for almost 300 years (1717). Although marginal during the Christian and Islamic Ages, they rose to power first in Western Europe through the biases of Renaissance, Classicism, Enlightenment Philosophy, American Revolution, French Revolution, Industrial Revolution, and Marxism – Leninism.

What are the main points that bear witness to a link between the secret company of the Freemasons and Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

First of all, there are several members of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition that are freemasons; they blindly and wholeheartedly execute the orders they receive. Mohamed el Baradei is one of them. You can be sure that in today’s world no one becomes Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency without being a Freemason, and more importantly, without being a very much trusted member of the villainous, Satanic organization. Positions like that are viewed by the Freemasons as outstanding posts and key instruments in their effort to take over the entire world, so only perfectly utilizable and utilized members are promoted to and maintained in such positions.

What few people know is that for them, their country and their religion are of no value, as the oath of allegiance they made when becoming freemasons supersedes every other and every previous.

Second, there is vast similarity of political language. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition promises now to deliver in Egypt corresponds to what other Freemasonry-controlled parties, mass media, associations, organizations, statesmen, politicians, journalists and intellectuals demanded or propagated in so many countries all over the world. The terms, the concepts, the ideals, the ‘values’, the words and the jargon evoked are exactly the same.

Third, there is vast similarity of targets and criticisms. Whom do they criticize? Always anyone who is not a Freemason or a Freemasonry-controlled party, association, organization, statesman, politician, journalist and intellectual!

With exactly the same resolution, they rejected two persons that belonged effectively to two different worlds, namely former President Hosni Mubarak and current President Muhammad Morsi, only because both are not freemasons! They certainly find excuses for this biased ludicrous attitude of theirs, and they publicly pretend that they reject totalitarian rulers, but their shameless stance is easily unveiled when one notices that finally, for the Freemasons and their puppets, the only non-totalitarian rulers are their Freemasonic ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’! This seclusion-promoting, highly discriminatory mindset is diametrically opposed to the normal, unbiased, average mindset of the human beings as this was attested across millennia. Of course, Mubarak and Morsi are not the only targets of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition! They also speak negatively about Venezuela’s Chavez, Bolivia’s Morales, Russia’s Putin, Belarus’ Lukashenko, etc., etc., etc. only because all these statesmen and rulers are not freemasons!

Fourth, there is vast similarity of political allies, models and points of reference. Whom do they refer to? Who is the perfect political example for them? Who are the perfect embodiments of all the ideas they evoke? Always Western European, North American states, parties, associations, mass media that are known to be under Freemasonic control or politicians and statesmen, journalists and intellectuals who are known to be Freemasons.

Fifth, there is vast similarity of methods. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition attempts to do now, other Freemasonry-controlled schemes tried to perpetrate in other countries in various moments over the past decades. Simply, not many people noticed (let alone studied) the correct parallels! One can effectively draw parallels and compare Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition with king Juan Carlos of Spain and his associates during the last decade of Franco’s regime, and after the Generalissimo’s death. For many years, Prince Juan Carlos promised fidelity to Franco’s ideals and respect to the Catholic Church’s concepts and social standards. However, treacherously enough, after Franco died, Freemason Juan Carlos promoted Freemasonic policies and practices up to the point of signing laws legitimizing adultery, abortion and, more recently, homosexual marriages and adoption of children by homosexual couples. In a 40 years space of time, all the traditional ethics, the cultural integrity, and the religious identity of Spain collapsed. This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will prove to be good for, if it is allowed to exist.

V. Freemasonry-impacted politics & parallels between Spain in the 1970s & Egypt in the 2010s

In the early 70s, Spain was still a European country apart from the then European Communities, well-attached to the local traditions and religion, and the Spanish society had managed to be
– only slightly influenced by the so-called modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– hardly characterized by notions of atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism, and
– even less affected by all aspects of modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism, and Western morals.

How did this happen? The answer is simple; Generalissimo Franco kept the Freemasons out of Spain, and his secret services developed a sophisticated network to monitor the country and successfully identify any attempt of Freemasonic infiltration.

Today’s Egypt is still a Mediterranean – Middle Eastern – East African country apart from the present world order, and the great majority of the Egyptian people are well-attached to the their traditions and religion.

Until the beginning of 2011, few Egyptians would easily ascribe to
– modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism,
– deviate behavior, lifestyle and sexual mores that are now promoted and made legitimate in the West, and
– extensive and overwhelming consumerism as attested in the West.

And although the whole world has been increasingly ‘modernized’ over the past 40 years with catastrophic impact on the socio-behavioral system of vast populations worldwide, involving the collapse of traditional values and the disintegration of the family-based social model, Egypt was hardly affected. As a matter of fact, in Egypt, the new, deviate morals of the West have been hardly accepted, whereas modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism were repeatedly and extensively conditioned upon Islamic criteria.

Why did this happen? Following the collapse of the kingdom (1952), most of the Freemasons left Egypt because their financial – political interests were gravely damaged with the then launched reforms. Most of pre-1952 Egypt’s Freemasons were foreigners, so they knew that, despites their losses in Egypt, they could make it elsewhere. However, Egyptian Freemasons left too, first because their financial – political interests were also heavily hit and their social position greatly undermined, and second because, as Freemasons, they were more attached to their so-called ‘brethren’ in Satan than to their country of origin. They expected they would ensure critical assistance in another country, and they actually ensured it and prospered.

Under the successive tenures of Muhammad Naguib, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el Sadat, and Hosni Mubarak, Freemasons attempted a mild, soft and covered comeback, but they found an unfriendly environment and their activities were minimal if not none. At those days, Freemasons around the world were comfortable seeing Jehan el Sadat and Suzanne Mubarak promoting Western ideas across the Egyptian society and offering the model of a Westernized Egyptian first lady to the world mass media.

But the Egyptian society reacted quite well, and preserved their values and traditions, rejecting the widely spread sexualization and pornification of the daily life and refusing the systematic attacks against the traditional ethics, virtues and culture. What occurred in the Western societies over the last six (6) decades did not actually happen in Egypt..

And the notorious Freemasonic lodge of Heliopolis that is rather called Baron Empain Palace (in Arabic ‘qasr al baron’; in French ‘le palais hindou’ – named after Édouard Louis Joseph, Baron Empain, 1852 – 1929) remained closed.

How was possible for Spain to deviate within just 40 years up to the point of being a fully anti-Christian state that does not penalize adultery, allows hundreds of thousands of embryos to be killed annually, and approves of non-Christian marriages that are only euphemistically called ‘civil marriages’?

How Spain reached the bottom of the world’s corruption and immorality by making legitimate the homosexual marriages and the adoption of children by homosexual couples?

The answer is simple: through massive, sophisticated, multifaceted, multilayered, successive, and coordinated Freemasonic lies, misinformation, deception, and duplicity diffused in public in a carefully conceived, methodically programmed, and systematically executed manner. We can analyze few key points of the evil behavior and policies testified by king Juan Carlos, Felipe Gonzalez, and Jose Zapatero, Spain’s key evil figures – all Freemasons.

They never announced their real targets from the beginning; only after one first step was made – as deterioration of the status of Catholic Spanish identity and culture (ex. legalization of the abortion) – another was announced (ex. legalization of homosexual marriages). This already demonstrates the evil intentions of the Freemasons, and sheds light on the deep reasons that impose oath-bound secrecy to Freemasons. The hidden masters of Freemasonry know that their real targets are humanly unacceptable; that’s why they first hire new members promising them socio-professional success, second bind their members by oath, third deliver portions of the reality to them, and fourth oblige them to work for the materialization of the overall, evil plan that, had most of the Freemasons known at the very beginning, they would have never accepted to become members.

In Spain, the leading Freemasons-in charge pursued an evil policy, by using either general popular support or support acquired on one occasion in order to promote an unannounced yet secretly programmed target, and by fooling the people on diverse subjects in order to extract acceptance on a specific point that is part of the Freemasonic scheme. The latter technique is tantamount to subversion of the common sense.

When a key term and element of the local common culture and worldview within a certain society loses its significance, the entire system within which it was located is automatically degraded, and this brings collapse upon collapse for all the key terms of the cultural-behavioral system. This situation triggers an advanced decay, and the immediate consequence is the weakening of the remaining key terms of common culture and worldview of the society in question. This is the way to social decomposition and to ultimate destruction of the Mankind.

To this deterioration there is no end, except the total disintegration of the human society and its transformation to a bestial realm whereby humans are totally disconnected from the spiritual world, cut off from the nature, and left without religion, without family, without traditions, and without culture. Therein, as it is already attested in the jungle, every notion of sin is forgotten, and the earth will look pretty much like the hell as we know it through the diverse religious traditions and textual evidence.

This social disintegration is to be expected for every tyrannical, Freemasonry-controlled society, and this is exactly what has already happened to misfortunate Spain, as it had previously occurred to Italy, France, Germany, Holland, England, various other Western European countries, the US, Japan, and the countries of the British Commonwealth.

This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is now greatly supported by the Freemasonic tyrannies of the West to carry out in Egypt.

VI. What will happen to Egypt if the liberal – secular opposition gains momentum?

As underlying philosophical currents and ideological systems, the following systems will be forcefully diffused, while opponents will be ridiculed through the criminal mass media possessed and controlled by the totalitarian, bogus- democratic, liberal – secular opposition:
– theories that support the Western pseudo-democracies (liberalism, neo-conservatism, social democracy) by creating false dilemmas,
– atheism, agnosticism, Darwinism, and social amoralism, and – last but not least – a deeply anti-Islamic approach to World History as per which religions stand accused for all the maledictions that have befallen on the Mankind, and
– a wild overdose of modernism, modern technology life style, consumerism, generalized sexualization and pornification of the daily life, matched with mass tourism, free of any need of compliance with Islamic criteria (tourism will be further utilized to corrupt the Egyptian mores and moral standards)

What is to be expected from Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition’s political platform at the sociopolitical level is the following:
– Egyptian single females will be able to rent flats and apartments of their own, and receive their friends there without the neighbors having the right to react.
– Courses of religion in the Primary and Secondary Education will be abolished (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– There will be an increased westernization wave in the Egyptian Primary, Preparatory and Secondary Education.
– Religion will stop being mentioned on the Egyptian identity cards, and passports.
– Abortion will be legalized pretty soon.
– An increased number of newspapers will start publishing pictures of women in bathing suits even on the first page.
– Adultery will not be penalized anymore.
– Alcohol will be allowed to be sold in all the restaurants, cafés, and supermarkets across the country.
– Homosexuality will not be considered reprehensible anymore.
– Pornography will increase dramatically in very short time.
– The first sex shops will appear in Down Town Cairo, in Alexandria, Port Said, Luxor and Aswan, as well as across the tourist resorts in the Red Sea coast and in the Sinai.
– Tolerance will be shown for provocative public appearance of the homosexuals, the prostitutes, and the transsexuals in order to adjust the country mores – not to the Egyptian people wishes and mentality (as it is now) but – to the demands of international NGOs; this means that the still existing notion of public decency will collapse and disappear.
– There will be more female than male judges – in full violation of the expectation, the wishes, and the political ideas of the outright majority of the Egyptian people.
– It will be allowed for homosexuals to declare in public their nature, without anyone being able to discriminate them – in their professional and social life.
– Religion will be separated from the state (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– Progressively, Friday will become a fully working day, and Sunday will replace it as the weekend’s 2nd day.
– Arabic will be written in Latin characters and numbers by an increasing number of people (this is nowadays called ‘Franco-Arab’), and some groups will issue the first websites, books and newspapers in this fake writing system.
– At a later stage, and when possible reactions of the majority will be discouraged, homosexual marriages will become legal.
– Adoption of children by homosexual couples will also become legal.

I expanded mainly on socio-behavioural, cultural and moral issues, but there will be a grave deformation of the Egyptian economy and politics as well. Meanwhile, Freemasons will expand their activities, open many lodges, and try to further penetrate in the Egyptian society in order to faster corrupt it and adjust it to their regional interests and global targets.

An important parameter of economic character that has to be anticipated is the forceful abandonment of the Egyptian agriculture, which will trigger an increased exodus from the Egyptian farmlands and provinces toward the urban centers and the (already) big cities.

If the tele-guided and remote-controlled leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition manage to put obstacles to the constitutional referendum (note: the speech was given before the 15 & 22/12/2012 referendum where the voter turnout reached only 32.86%), stop the political process (note: here they proved to be successful by cancelling the announced parliamentary elections of 22 April – and runoffs up to 24 June 2013), overthrow the newly elected president and government, and finally climb to power, one has to expect that the percentage of the population working in agriculture will drop dramatically under 5% – under the vicious and false pretext of the ‘modernization’ of Egypt’s economy. The ensuing result will be a heavy dependence of Egypt on agricultural imports which will push the whole country to further debts and total disaster.

The recent examples of many heavily indebted European countries (Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, etc.) show clearly how cruelly and disastrously an indebted country is dealt with by the world’s leading financial institutions, e.g. the credit-rating agencies, the financial services companies, the asset management companies, the big banks, , and the hidden force behind those gangsters: the Freemasons. Now, in the case of a heavily indebted Egypt, there will be more levers of Freemasonic pressure, notably the colonial powers, e.g. France, England, America, and their disrespectful dependencies, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Holland, etc.

Egyptians from all the walks of life should take note, as soon as they can, of the fact that Greece’s and Cyprus’ foreign policies have been tremendously flexed after their grave economic problems exploded. Both EU-member states had – during many long decades – balanced relations with the Arab League-member states and Israel. More particularly, Greece had closer and warmer relations with the Arab League-member states, either during the tenures of C. Caramanlis as prime minister (1955 – 1963 and 1974 – 1980) or under the colonel junta (1967 – 1973) or at the times of A. Papandreou’s premiership (1981 – 1989).

Now, Cyprus has been sold out to Israel, and the two signed many agreements of economic, political and military cooperation; in an effort to jointly explore the gas resources of the Mediterranean Sea continental shelf, they seem to have even signed an anti-Turkish pact that remains secret. In its gloomy perspectives of survival, Israel tries desperately to engulf other countries, weak governments, and silly politicians, without caring about the catastrophic impact such an engulfment will have on those countries.

Greece is a bankrupt country that was not allowed to announce its bankruptcy officially; this happened because the vicious, corrupt, and demented European statesmen did not want this ‘event’ to trigger sudden, catastrophic developments in the European Union that would not be contained. That is why a multi-level effort has been undertaken, repeatedly changed, and properly re-adjusted in order to effectively postpone the announcement of the bankruptcy for the time when it will not affect Europe in anything. Meanwhile, the leader of Greece’s right-center party first visited the criminal Israeli prime minister to accept his terms and announce an alliance with the Zionist country and then was supported by the US and the EU as head of a tripartite alliance and subsequently appointed as prime minister (although his party did not have the majority, having gathered only 31% at the last elections).

If rising to power, Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will fast accumulate new debts to
a) comply with the orders of the Freemasonic institutions and governments that have systematically backed the opposition since January 2011 (and already before!) and
b) implement their economic policies, unrealistic promises, and demagogic pledges for which they need money that even now is not available in Egypt.

As the liberal – secular opposition’s leaders act similarly with their villainous and criminal patrons, their practices and policies will bring about a vast corruption, because they will appoint all their members and followers, tolerate large part of Mubarak’s nomenclature, and isolate the vast masses of population. They will try immediately to create a police-machine to support them in power, and the cities will be flooded by jobless fellahin because the destruction of agriculture will become target no 1 of a so-called democratic, liberal – secular government in Egypt.

Few months of a liberal – secular government in Egypt will finally unveil both, the secret reasons of Freemasonic support to today’s opposition and the ultimate target of the criminal Western Freemasons in Egypt. Few months of liberal – secular tyranny in Egypt will demonstrate why the Freemasonry-controlled, criminal, Western regimes abandoned their local puppet, Hosni Mubarak, and instigated the developments that took place in January – February 2011 in the Tahrir Square theater. Under Mubarak, the much wanted (by the Freemasonic masters of the world order) process of Egypt’s westernization, socio-economic corruption, social destitution, moral demolition, and national decomposition did not advance as fast as they needed. Of course, the inhuman global rulers would never trust any Egyptian Islamist party in power.

In fact, the secret Freemasonic target behind the Tahrir Square events was the definite substitution of Mubarak by some weak, ignorant and idiotic puppets of lesser importance (the ludicrous figures of El Baradei and Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes), who would speed up the process that Mubarak tried to slow down or even avert wherever he and his subordinates managed to notice it. If the Satanic masters of Freemasonry and the their puppets, e.g. the top rulers the present political world order, could automatically replace Mubarak with El Baradei, no Tahrir Square events would ever take place. That is all!

As a matter of fact, if today’s liberal – secular opposition manages in the future to climb to power in Egypt, the country will be ruled in exactly the same manner as under Mubarak, except the country’s foreign policy will be catastrophic for the national interests and the sociopolitical process will bring forth a vast and generalized destruction of the traditional values, elimination of the religious concepts, and collapse of the socio-behavioral system. An indescribable diffusion of materialistic, consumerist, pornographic ideas and practices will take place in order to eradicate any attachment to traditions, moral standards, and Islamic virtues.

Under a nefarious El Baradei – Hamdin Sabahy dictatorship, unemployment will be remedied with prostitution, and this concerns the imperiled Egyptian women not only within the context of their country, but also in a wider setup, which is made available by the monstrous Freemasonic fabrication ‘Euro-Mediterranean Partnership’ and the Satanic plan providing for a Union for the Mediterranean. The aforementioned silly and pathetic puppets will find it worthy to further integrate their country into the Euro-Satanic realm of villainous homosexual marriages and utmost sexualization.

Who promotes these contaminations worldwide?

Yahoo, MSN, Google and the other criminal Freemasonic – Zionist outfits, which already support El Baradei, Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes!

In parallel, increased agricultural imports and boosted consumerism (which translates to further imports) will unquestionably drive Egypt to its knees, and the bankruptcy will come in less than 2 years. A bankrupt Egypt will become the perfect tool at the hands of America, Europe, Israel, and their vicious, heinous and ominous ally, the colonial state of Abyssinia, e.g. Fake Ethiopia. At that time, the Nile waters conspiracy of the Freemasonic – Zionist gangsters will come to surface in all its dimensions to further function as an extra lever of pressure and ensure the final decomposition of the country.

If things reach that level, the outright majority of the Egyptian people, even if they manage to kick the so-called democratic, liberal – secular government out, will not have the chance to outmaneuver the evil plans against Egypt that the Freemasons and the Zionists have long prepared against Egypt and the valley of the Nile in general – including Sudan. That’s why it is important to keep today’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition under control, out of power, and in ramshackle, before they succeed to obtain power in Egypt.

This is the key point: beyond plans of political subversion of Egypt, beyond programs of social-behavioral and cultural disintegration of Egypt, and beyond projects of economic destruction and disastrous bankruptcy of Egypt, the Western colonial countries that are the international politics’ tools of the Freemasons attempt to harm the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.

VII. Major threats against Egypt’s national integrity

What are the major points of the Freemasonic – Zionist projects in this regard?

– Creation of troubles in Port Said, Suez, and the Sinai – serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo and the Zionist state that will find itself ‘threatened’, and this will serve as ‘venue’ for Israel to interfere.

– Creation of troubles in Halaib. Serious deterioration of the relations between Khartoum and Cairo

– Nile water troubles. Serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo, Khartoum and the Anti-African, colonial state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) because of the construction of two dams (one in Atbara River and another in the Blue Nile); with strong US-European-Israeli support, the barbaric and genocidal state of Abyssinia will declare earlier treaties about the Nile water flow as not binding.

– Serious change in the Northeast African balance of power, with Khartoum getting greater Nile share in exchange with the formation of an anti-Egyptian alliance with the Neo-Nazi state of Abyssinia

– Advanced level of diffusion of separatist ideas among Nubians in both Egypt and the Sudan

– Without Egypt’s involvement, Sudan will soon disintegrate, with first Darfur and then Kordofan seceding. Longer the US, UK, French and Abyssinian embassies stay in Khartoum, closer the end of Sudan comes. Then, the Bejas in the East (Port Sudan, Sawakin and Kessala) will revolt and demand independence. This event will affect Egypt greatly, because the Bejas will demand for them the Halaib triangle and extra territory in Egypt’ extreme Southeast (Ras Banas, Berenice) that is inhabited by Egypt’s Beja minority.

– Becoming a landlocked country, Sudan will implode; the Nubians in the North will declare independence. This development will also affect Egypt, as big money is now being diffused to promote themes and motives of the Nubian political mythology.

VIII. Focus on the world’s most Anti-Egyptian state: the genocidal state of Fake Ethiopia

At this point, I intend to expand more on this subject; the racist, Satanic regime that controls Abyssinia is the world’s most inhuman, barbaric and criminal regime. More genocides have been perpetrated in the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia over the past 150 years than in the rest of the world.

Who is responsible for this?

The Satanic directorate of Freemasonry, and the subservient countries France, England, America and Israel that in different moments supported those who have been in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

Who are in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)?

Two Semitic tribes that originate from Yemen, and crossed to Africa in repeated waves, before ca. 2500 years, e.g. the Amhara and the Tigray

Together, the Amhara and the Tigray constitute ca. 31% of the country’s total population; they basically live in the north of the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia, close to the borders with Eritrea and Sudan. The cruelest among them resettled in the Occupied Oromo capital city Finfinne (that bears officially the genocidal name ‘Addis Ababa’, a name given by the inhuman and Anti-African invaders), which is located at the colonial state’s geographical center, which is in reality the territory of Occupied Oromia. However, many Amhara and fewer Tigray are Muslims, whereas the rest are fake Christians (called Tewahedo – Monophysitic). It is in fact the Tewahedo fake Christian Amhara and Tigray who control the country of Fake Ethiopia. They are not more than 17% of the country’s total population.

The historical area of Abyssinia, prior to the Freemasonry-promoted expansion, was very small – less than half of Egypt’s Delta. It is a mountainous, arid territory. There was located the Amharas’ and Tigrays’ small and barbaric kingdom that was disdained by all Muslims across Eastern Africa after it was formed, around 700 years ago (1270).

Only after 1850, with the systematic and multifaceted support of the English and the French colonials, i.e. the servile tools of the global Freemasonic policy, the useless and tiny Abyssinian kingdom started expanding at the detriment of many great African kingdoms, notably those of the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Afars, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Agaws, the Somalis of Ogaden, and others.

How the Freemasonic gangsters of England and France helped the barbaric, incestuous, and inhuman tribes of Amhara and Tigray?

a) The English and the French colonials sold plenty of guns to them, and encouraged them to make war on the rest.

b) They managed to block any arms sales to the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Somalis of Ogaden, and the rest, and

c) At the time England and France continued their Anti-African colonial wars in Sudan under the filthy and fallacious pretext ‘Abolition of slavery’, the two criminal states calmly allowed the Abyssinians to make a very profitable business by selling slaves and buying guns – to use them in the genocides that they were encouraged by the English and the French diplomats and military to perpetrate, and which they provenly perpetrated. Only the aforementioned truth is enough to show how vicious, duplicitous and evil are the gangsters who impersonate the diplomats, the agents, the scholars and the statesmen of England and France, and who are Freemasons in their majority.

After forming their colonial state (over the period 1840 – 1955), the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians preserved their monstrous country, Fake Ethiopia, through continuous, multileveled genocides that involved massacres of dozens of millions of subjugated people – and this is something that the Freemasonry-controlled newspapers of France, England, America, Canada, Australia, etc. have never mentioned, whereas the criminal, freemasonic TV channels of falsehood, BBC, CNN, NBC, Al Jazira, Arabiya, and their likes have kept, even until now, under silence.

The filthy political mythology and the related literature of the Amhara-Tigray Abyssinian tyranny is essential for every Egyptian to read, study, analyze, and assess as imminent and lethal threat against Egypt.

While infiltrating other countries, the Abyssinians methodically promote the culture of their barbaric, incestuous and filthy tribe that knows no notion of real faith, integrity, family, honesty, humanity, and honor. There is practically speaking no marriage among them; every man and woman can live together and separate at any time; they practice black magic extensively; many of them belong to a filthy group called Rastafarians who believe that the former bogus-king Haile Selassie was the Messiah and Jesus Christ reincarnate!!! They have many filthy practices that they keep secret; they are all addicted to drugs (cannabis in particular), but they are recognizable through their dreadlocks and their favorite colors yellow, green and red that are those of the flag of Fake Ethiopia.

Dreadlocks and the Abyssinian flag’s colours have recently infiltrated Egypt, and it would be crucial for the Islamic movements of Egypt to prohibit them, persecute the users, identify the traces of their contacts, and finally cut every connection these users may have with countries abroad.

Rastafarians appear to be a small religious group that first started in Jamaica (there are now ca. 100000 Rastafari and affiliates in the island nation) and still has few members scattered across the world (ca. 1 million people, mainly in Abyssinia); however, the reality is different. The Rastafarians as an instrumental Satanic sect; they defame the main historical religions of the world, like Islam, Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, and they serve locally as substitute to the fake Tewahedo Christianity of Abyssinia, and globally as support to the Freemasonic religious formations of Protestant Christianity (another heretical group) and Zionist Judaism (a vicious and villainous deviation from Orthodox Judaism). They are greatly involved in politics, and in this case, a good example is offered by the criminal gangster Jendayi Frazer, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, heading the Bureau of African Affairs, who was a key Rastafarian and promoted Anti-African policies and strategies of the worst sort.

Rastafarians manage to deceitfully attract sympathy as African originals whereas their faith is the absolute rejection of all African traditions and religions; using typical Marketing methods, they make of the show business (notably Bob Marley, and the entire reggae music, but not only) a key tool of their infiltration policy among unsuspicious populations across the world – and more particularly among targeted countries, like Sudan and Egypt. But, look at the following:

Rastafarians’ god is named Jah – just the first half of the Hebrew god Jahveh.

Rastafarians accept the Trinity as revealed in Haile Selassie pre-ascension name Ras Tafari (that they call the ‘power of the trinity’).

The perfect world or the Paradise for the materialist, godless Rastafarians is already called Zion! They believe they will achieve to live in it, if their barbaric and antihuman contamination is spread over sizeable parts of Eastern Africa and subsequently proclaimed as state religion.

Rastafarians accept as holy an execrable, filthy trash, i.e. a purely Satanic text of false historical claims that is called ‘Kebra Negast’. In it, the world’s history is viciously altered to fit Abyssinian – Zionist interests to the detriment of all – Christianity, Islam, Africa and the Mankind in general. Kebra Negast is an incredible forgery written by villainous and paranoid authors under fully demonic guidance. One can easily describe it as Satan’s bible.

In Kebra Negast and in other execrable texts of theirs, Rastafarians attempted to usurp the tradition of Queen of Sheba (Balqis) from Yemen. They have fallaciously associated it with Abyssinia, and they subsequently added tons of lies in order to justify their top target, namely the control of Sudan and Egypt by them, and the split of both countries’ territory between Israel and Fake Ethiopia.

Part of the vicious Rastafarian plan of Eastern Africa’s pornification, social decomposition, and moral degradation was the usurpation of the fair name of Ethiopia, which was an Ancient Greek and Latin name for the Kushitic state of Sudan immediately south of Egypt, with capital first at Karima (then Napata – for the period 800 – 500 BCE) and then at Bagrawiyah (then Meroe – for the period 450 BCE – 370 CE). The Ancient Sudanese state, which was named Ethiopia, was culturally – ethnically – linguistically unrelated to the Axumite Abyssinia which sheltered the first Yemenites who crossed to Africa mainly in the second half of the first millennium BCE, and who happen to be the ancestors of the Amhara and Tigray, the cruel tribes that rule tyrannically the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia. In no case, can Abyssinia be called Ethiopia, and this should be the basis of a Sudanese – Egyptian alliance against Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia). The only country that could rightfully be named ‘Ethiopia’ is Sudan.

Rastafarians deliberately call the entire Africa ‘Zion’!

Actually, the rest of the world is their enemy, and they call it ‘Babylon’ in a fraudulent effort of fallacious utilization of the old defeat of Judah and exile at Babylonia. But this makes the entire Islam part of Babylon, which is sheer distortion of both, historical truth and political reality.

In another forged statement of theirs, Rastafarians claim that they are the real Children of Israel!

The link between Fake Ethiopia and Israel is highlighted by the use of the title ‘Lion of Judah’ and by Rastafarians’ villainous goal to repatriate to their fictional Mount Zion. Even in Jamaica, they dirtied a place by naming it ‘Mount Zion’. Here one can remember the wicked songs by Bob Marley ‘Zion Train’ and ‘Iron Lion Zion’; it is to be remembered that in a degenerate manner, and contrarily to Islam’s moral orders and Egypt’s national interests, Amr Diab sang in Arabic few hits by Bob Marley.

In an insolence proportioned to their wickedness, Rastafarians propagate that Amharic will be the language of the Paradise, reject the idea that the heaven is in the sky, and place their fake paradise in Abyssinia. They are absolutely materialist in their theory because they believe that in the Hereafter, humans will have their physical bodies. This is an alarming warning to all the nations of Eastern Africa, either independent or subjugated: Rastafarians’ fake paradise will be the African nations’ ultimate hell.

Little matters whether the Rastafarians have the tacit support of the Freemasonic masters of the present global order. It the Rastafarians manage to achieve their plans, this will achieved only because of the African nations’ lack of foresightedness.

Quite ludicrously but also quite meaningfully, one group of Rastafarians is called ‘Twelve Tribes of Israel’.

Rastafarians justify their addiction to cannabis by referring and altering verses of the Hebrew Bible, and the Revelation; they also justify their dreadlocks in the same manner.

Finally, by supporting Afro-centrism (which should be top task for Egypt’s and Sudan’s academia, diplomats and intellectuals), they appear as the champions of Africa, exactly as the Freemasons want them to be, thus keeping Egypt and Sudan at the level of the academically, intellectually and educationally colonized countries that keep disastrously propagating the fake Greco-Romano-centric dogma of History that the French and English Freemasons and so-called Hellenists produced in the first place.

IX. Colonial academic falsehood promoted by both, Mubarak’s regime and the liberal – secular opposition, at the detriment of Egypt’s national interests

It is therefore time for us to examine now how much Mubarak’s academic – educational system damaged Egypt’s interests, through the promotion of colonial academic falsehood, and how the same will happen if Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition rises in power.

Ever since Napoleon and his Savants of the Institut de France arrived in Egypt, and following Egypt’s real secession from the Ottoman Empire and submission to effective colonial and Anti-Islamic rule which was nominally executed by the Freemason Muhammad Ali, Napoleon’s disciple in Satanism, Egypt’s educational and academic institutions were progressively adjusted and fully attuned to Euro-centric, racist, colonial historical falsehood.

This is a complete system of historical forgery that presents the Ancient Greek civilization as central to the entire world, exaggerates the importance of Greek and Roman presence in Africa, and places in Ancient Greece and Rome the origin of the modern European civilization. At the same time, the said system passes under silence the vast, enduring, determinant, multifaceted, and overwhelming impact of the ancient Oriental and African civilizations (notably the Egyptian civilization) on the formation of Ancient Greece, Rome, Christian Europe, and Modern Europe. Critical historical developments and processes, such as the extensive diffusion of Oriental, Persian, and Egyptian cultures and religions across the Roman Empire, are kept unknown to the average people (although experts are fully aware of the reality).

The historical forgery of Greco-Romano-centrism portrays the History of the Orient, Asia, and Africa as lower, marginal and unimportant if compared to the past of the West.

But by fully diffusing and duly imposing this false system across Egypt, the successive Egyptian administrations of the 19th and the 20th century, as well as the westernized Egyptian academia gave a disastrous picture of Egypt to other African and Oriental nations. They looked to them as totally subservient to the European and the American colonials. This development generated an antipathy for Egypt among Africans, and this feeling was progressively transformed into contempt and hatred, following the ceaseless Anti-Egyptian propaganda of the heinous diplomats and agents of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).

Contrarily, by allying itself with countries, universities and movements that promote Afro-centrism, Fake Ethiopia tries to gain points and influence among unsuspicious, gullible Africans. This situation will continue, because Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition, if it rises in power, will be deceived by their own masters and promoters, who will first ask them to continue the same academic –educational falsehood that harms Egypt, Africa and Islam altogether.

At the political level, if Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition rises to power, their present supporters will deploy a great effort to minimize to the secular – liberal government of Egypt the possible damage Fake Ethiopia can do to Egypt, thus offering valuable time to the cruel Neo-Nazi rulers of Addis Ababa to advance in their plans, particularly at the level of the Nile water flow. Being cheated by their own promoters, Egypt’s liberal – secular parties and politicians constitute certainly the greatest internal danger for the country and all the Egyptians.

By being deeply anchored in Western and pro-Western schemes, ideas, theories and practices, the leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition clearly demonstrate that they did not make a momentary alliance, but they are totally tied to Western guidance, and this proves that they will never have the ability to properly establish the always necessary criticism of the West. These political figures will not be able to distinguish between West’s interests and Egypt’s interests, and much less effectively defend their country at all levels.

Where does all this bring us?

It is clear that a liberal – secular government in Egypt will speed up the process of Egypt’s disintegration at all levels, national included.

X. Another dimension of threats to Egypt’s national integrity and physical existence

One has to complete the picture; the secession of the Sinai, the separation of Halaib and Egypt’s southeastern confines to serve the project providing for a Red Sea Beja state, and the independence of Nubia may look minimal or even unimportant, if one examines details through an unconventional viewpoint.

Even an eventual division of Egypt into two countries, Muslim and Christian, can be attested in the global mass media, and in some US-based Coptic portals. At this point, I have to stress that this threat should be taken seriously by every Egyptian; it is not a joke. Wherever there is a discussion about an eventual development that looks incredible from a first viewpoint, one must be sure that behind the discussion, there are hidden and real interests and that a substantive profit is anticipated by those who push toward this eventual development. In addition, one must take into consideration that projects that may have advanced very slowly for decades can suddenly get accelerated and be implemented within an unexpectedly short time.

But unfortunately, for today’s Egypt, evil circles have planned worse than the aforementioned; and this is even more serious, because it does concern merely the national integrity of the country, but its very physical existence! It relates to the very existence of the valley of the Nile, as it has always been known through millennia.

Before going ahead, I must point out that I don’t consider the expression of a threat as an ominous event that already took place. No! A threat is just a threat; not an event. But it can be materialized. And there lies the importance of a threat. If the threat, its sources, its factors, and its execution are identified, the threat can be addressed and averted; and in this case, the threat is not really dangerous anymore. But if the threat is not identified, if the execution of a threat is a matter of catastrophic oversight, and if the threatened entity continues living as if nothing happens, then we have to be sure that the threat will be materialized and the threatened entity will be submitted to its fate.

What is this threat about?

– A strange threat that is repeated in the mouths, in the speeches, in the texts of the worst enemies of Egypt

– A strange threat that is related with apocalyptic texts, with holy books of different peoples, notably the Old Testament

– A strange threat that some consider as prophesied long ago but able to be materialized only after the 1960s, because of the erection of a huge construction project – the demolition of which would entail the physical annihilation of the valley of the Nile

– A strange threat that can be materialized only now, because of the existence of advanced high technology – of which only few people today have a vague idea

– A strange threat that brings forth the physical annihilation of the land in an unprecedented way

This is certainly something that the people, the leading organizations, and the government of the threatened country must take very seriously, and fast react by proper, concerted action.

I should however add that this threat is nothing new; it was widely discussed among various circles in the past, although these discussions were never highlighted by the global mass media. At the time, prophecy experts and analysts or other theoreticians involved did not have it easy to explain the way by which the said prophecy would be materialized in the future. However, more recently, after 1965, several biblical interpreters came up with fresh, and more illuminated explanations.

Customarily, the threat is portrayed as a statement originally included in the holy book of the Ancient Hebrews, the Torah (Old Testament). But there have been plenty of geo-strategic implications, nationalistic attachments, side views, recent foretelling, odd oracles, political visions, and chauvinistic omen that further illustrated different approaches to and viewpoints of the statement. The subject may be vast to expand thereon here, but I intend to show key political ramifications.

A relatively recent presage was mentioned in the narrative of the Russian Military Officer, Explorer, and Orthodox Monk Alexander Bulatovich who was the tsar’s envoy to Abyssinia during the years 1896 – 1899 and carried out there many excursions, observations and explorations that he later wrote down in a voluminous opus. The narrative is included in the chapter about the family of the emperor.

As a matter of fact, this chapter is of great importance today for the diplomatic and national security services of Egypt and the Sudan, because the text reveals in detail what exactly the filthy, rancorous and wicked Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians have so well and so long tried to hide.

This chapter reveals that the regime, the elites and the upper classes of these incestuous and barbarous tribes, namely the Amhara and the Tigray, have persistently acted after a secret program (that they call “prophecy” because of their sick, abnormal and degenerate mind) to destroy Egypt and Sudan, and thus expand their cannibalistic tyranny throughout East Africa. Their ulcerous antipathy of Islam, their Anti-Coptic odium, their Anti-African hatred, their complete devotion to Satan, who is the real master of their incestuous and lawless society, and their desire to expand their rule throughout Eastern Africa is highlighted in the following excerpt:

“In one of the prophecies of Raguil to Atye Zadyngylyu (he received revelations in his sleep and then wrote them down), it is said that a king from the north will be with a king of Ethiopia one in spirit and one in heart. In another prophecy of Angel Auriel to Sahle Selassie, it is said that a king of the north and of Jerusalem will meet with a king of Ethiopia in Mysyr (Egypt) and will conquer Egypt. After this, they will divide among them all the land”.

It is essential to bring in mind that at the time this text was written there was no state of Israel and the entire territory of Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Caliphate.

The above text plainly testifies to the monstrous and inhuman nature of the genocidal Abyssinian state. Taking into consideration that the text was not written by a scientific explorer or a political philosopher but by the last tsar’s envoy, who had also the task to offer an alternative to the Abyssinian – English relations and increase Russia’s influence in the area, one can realize through the lines of the text the extent of the inhumanity and the evil deeds perpetrated by the monsters of Abyssinia over the invaded and occupied lands. Of course, these deeds were carried out with the approval of the English and the French, i.e. the colonial powers that never regretted, never repented, never apologized for their African Holocaust. These countries and their accomplices (euphemistically called allies) are the real supporters of the Egyptian secular- liberal opposition, and their support is only due to the continuation and advancement of the same murderous policies of which the present Egyptian secular- liberal opposition will be the next victim if they happen to rise in power.

The evil eschatological dreams of Greater Ethiopia threaten not only Egypt and the Sudan, but also other neighboring countries, such as Somalia and Eritrea, and more than the rest, all the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), e.g. the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Kaffas, the Shekachos, the Hadiyas, the Kambaatas, the Agaws, the Wolayitas and others, who also fight for their independence.

The diplomats and the administrators, the academia and the intellectuals, the imams and the priests, the deputies and the ministers of the aforementioned countries, and the liberation leaders and activists of the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia must study and fully understand the insightful documentation available in this book, which was published by the Russian explorer before 110 years. Only then, they will be able to properly assess the detrimental dangers that are dangling over their heads.

In and by itself, Alexander Bulatovich’s With the Armies of Menelik constitutes good reason for the entire world, and more specifically for all African and Islamic countries, to be greatly preoccupied with the source of every regional trouble and instability: the villainous Amhara and Tigray (Tewahedo) Monophysitic Abyssinian tribes that have perpetrated the world’s most abhorrent genocides, ruling tyrannically over the lands they invaded and over the nations they subjugated since the middle of the 19th century.

The fact that the uncivilized Abyssinians have lawlessly and shamelessly usurped the name of Ethiopia, which historically belongs to Sudan and to the Kushitic African nations, like the Oromos, the Sidamas, and the Afars, is only the top of the iceberg. They did so in order to falsely claim what is not theirs, and what has never been theirs: the Nile and the adjacent lands that the great river crosses.

The developments that are planned to trigger the above discussed ‘division’ of the territories of Egypt and Sudan (then named Mysyr) between Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and Israel involve something that was unknown in 1896: the destruction of Aswan High Dam and the elimination of life from the valley of the Nile and the Delta region for a period of 40 years.

Many modern preachers who belong to fake Christian denominations fabricated by the Freemasons, like the Evangelicals, often speak about this point, referring to the Old Testament and analyzing selected excerpts. What is described in those excerpts as a potentiality of divine punishment administered to the old times’ polytheistic wickedness is now shamelessly misinterpreted as pending punishment ‘due’ to modern times’ Egyptian Anti-Israelism, which in fact is a mere Anti-Ashkenazism or Anti-Khazarianism.

This effort of misinterpretation shows that cruel regimes’ and gangsters’ political wishes are easily linked to Biblical excerpts, as the evilness of the devious necessarily involves usurpation of God’s words. This illuminates the Satanic nature of the Freemasonry, and of their evil outfits, namely the fake Christian Tewahedo Monophysitic Abyssinians, the fake Jewish Zionists (Ashkenazi Khazarians), and the radically pro-Zionist, fake Christian Evangelicals.

The subject is highly dangerous for Egypt as it is linked to the entire issue of Nile River water dispute between Egypt, Sudan and Abyssinia. This only underscores the reality that longer the secular – liberal opposition is allowed to act in Egypt, fewer will be the chances of the Egyptian people to get plain information, assess the existing threats, and safely and timely take action. The secular – liberal opposition has become the perfect Freemasonic tool of destruction of the Nile valley, as it has only engulfed Egypt into internal strives that prevent the country from preparing for a faceoff with Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and from outmaneuvering the aforementioned evil Freemasonic plot.