Tag Archives: USA

Zionist – Freemasonic – Jesuit Agendas in Conflict or Superposition: End Times’ Sequence & Trajectories

Shrewd commentators, who oppose present world’s negative developments and nature, find* that, within the context of divided Christianity, “healing the schism would be great”, and that there are “forces trying to bring the two churches together” (Catholic & Orthodox).

 

However, they also observe that, on the other hand, other projects, like the notorious, Kalergi plan and the ongoing Islamist immigration, truly gain momentum. Finding the two trends opposite to one another, they ask “why would Rome lay down to this?”.

 

Christian Reunification, Kalergi Plan, Mass Immigration, Europe’s Islamization – Zionists, Freemasons, Jesuits

 

The present article explains why the two, seemingly opposite, spirals and dynamics correspond to either different agendas or different agendas’ chapters and serve diverse trajectories, without truly being opposite to one another.

 

Indeed, it makes no sense for the European Christian churches (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox) to reunite together, if one accepts to be overridden by the Islamization process. However, at this point, there are at work different projects and trajectories that are promoted by opposite forces, without however being frontally opposite to one another.

 

I. Anti-Messianic, Anti-Eschatological Freemasons: the Apostate Lodge

 

You know that the ‘elite’ is not one, but divided into Jesuits, Freemasons, and Zionists and each group has its centuries-old (or rather millennia-long) agenda. In addition, there are internal factions, which also pursue divergent agendas; in other words, these internal splits and factions do not exist for any other reason except agenda differentiation.

 

The main forces involved and their different agendas reveal automatically the existence of diverse eschatological/messianic plans or the absence / rejection thereof. (The latter is also to be reckoned with.)

 

The atheistic lodge Grand Orient de France (this is the bulk of the Scottish / French rite in France: it controls Le Droit Humain lodges and it is engaged in fierce fighting against the Grande Loge Nationale Francaise, which is an English rite outfit in France) not only does not promote eschatological / messianic plans, but also opposes all existing ones, be they Freemasonic, Jesuit or Zionist of origin/nature.

 

II. Schism within Ashkenazi, pseudo-Jewish, Khazarian Zionism

 

When I was in Israel (1984-1985) during my postgraduate studies (Egyptology / Assyriology), I came upon a Zionist branch that was also anti-eschatological and anti-messianic. What did they teach / propagate in their seminars? That the Messiah had already come, that ‘he’ is Eretz (the state of) Israel, and that we therefore live in the messianic times, when the Messiah (Israel) will progressively outshine the rest of the world (the Goyim).

 

So, it is only normal for that Zionist branch to cooperate with Grand Orient de France and with other similar forces (within the Zionist universe and outside of it) in order to promote stability and permanence of the Post WW II world. (By the way, the Clintons belong to this faction, contrarily to Netanyahu.)

 

The aforementioned two cases are only examples.

 

The Greater Israel plan is then not necessarily supported by all Zionist groups, because any plan linked to a personal Messiah would be rejected by the Zionists who identify the Messiah with the state of Israel itself.

 

However, I would say that today the mainstream Zionist world backs the Greater Israel plan; they associate a person with it; they prepare the erection of the Third Temple; some even say in public that they have identified who the future King of Israel is. Few boast having met him in person! And others try to conceal that they have truly come face to face with that atrocious creature. This Zionist plan entails various global developments and the rise of a sizeable Israel (from Euphrates to the Nile) to global prominence.

 

Before explaining what this can eventually mean, I would say that opposite eschatological / messianic plans (those of the Freemasons, of the Jesuits, and eventually of others) may

a. either be in direct opposition with the aforementioned (‘mainstream’) Zionist plan

b. or move on different trajectories that follow different time perspectives (what we would define as ‘short-run’, ‘mid-run’, long-run’).

 

This means that the force that promotes a long-run plan can eventually, under some conditions, and within some limits, may consent to a short-term plan, even if it from the first sight looks extremely opposite to the long-run plan. They may even use it – and this, I believe, is the true nature of the present Jesuit-Zionist alliance; that’s why Francis I avoids criticizing homosexuality, etc., etc., etc. These are minor and trivial points, if compared to the foremost geopolitical-eschatological plans of the Jesuit Order.

 

III. Each eschatological/messianic agenda involves also a different Messiah

 

Most people believe that ‘the elite’ wants to prepare the necessary conditions for their (fake) Messiah/Christ, who will be the long awaited Antichrist. This is very wrong; in fact, there will be many false Christs (pseudo-Christs) and only the last and more powerful one will be the Antichrist (the one mentioned in the Book of Revelation, and in Daniel). This is also consistent with Jesus’ prophecy or description of End times’ stages, namely the statement that ‘many’ will come pretending they are the Christ/Messiah.

 

I don’t believe that only Zionists, Freemasons and Jesuits will come up with their Messiahs, each of them with a different guy. There will be more than just three pseudo-Christs. There will be an Orthodox Russian Christ (at least there is a plan providing for him, elaborated among some independent circles in Russia); there will be at least two Mahdis (a Shia and a Sunni); there will be a Parsist Shosyant, and many other religions’ or sects’ expected messianic figures will appear too. This makes sense, and it only reconfirms Jesus’ words that “nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom” (Mark 13:8 New International Version – NIV).

 

{Key note: I never use KJV by the way – I did crosscheck it with the Greek Septuagint and the Latin Vulgata texts in hundreds of excerpts, and in most of the cases, the meaning of the text was terribly altered to be evidently adapted to Freemasonic concepts. KJV is an untrustworthy forgery and a theological fornication.}

 

The below interpretational diagrams are all wrong and simplistic:

  1. the Zionist Messiah is the Antichrist
  2. the Islamist Mahdi is the Antichrist

(actually no Muslim will believe a Mahdi without a re-appearing Islamic Prophet Jesus, so in that case, one has to expect a tandem or to see fake persons impersonating the roles ascribed to Mahdi and to Jesus as Islamic Prophet)

  1. the Zionist Messiah will eliminate the Islamist Mahdi
  2. the Islamist Mahdi will prevail over the Zionist Messiah

 

IV. A reminiscence of the end times of the Roman Res Publica

 

I believe that, in several successive ‘stages’ of 3.5 or 7 years duration (and this depends on what one considers as ‘stage’), three major circles will be completed.

 

I feel that these circles will be a sort of reminiscence of (or will have some analogy with) the last century of Roman Res Publica, which led to Imperium: Sulla-Cinna-Marius / Crassus-Pompey-Caesar / Marc Antony-Lepidus-Octavian Augustus. The three circles will be as follows.

 

V. Zionist Agenda & the Khazarian Greater Israel

 

Greater IsraelFor this purpose, mainstream Zionists need to ensure:

 

1. the pulverization of several surrounding Middle Eastern states (Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia) by different means, military, socio-political, geotechnical engineering (Egypt can entirely disappear with the quasi-totality of its population within few hours, if a 9.4 Richter earthquake takes place in Aswan and brings down the High Dam).

 

((By the way, the Amhara/Tigray Abyssinians, who control the vast colonial state of ‘Ethiopia’ with numerous subjugated nations that strive for national independence, and who are the allies of the Israeli Khazarian Zionists, have a seven centuries old ‘prophecy’, which became known to Westerners in the late 18th century; according to this ‘vision’, their state at the End Times would share borders – dividing Egypt – with a Jewish state named ‘Israel’ and located in Palestine. When this was published, there was no Zionist Congress!))

 

2. the collapse of Europe – and here fits the Kalergi plan

 

3. the first, small, ‘contained’ nuclear war between Russia and America that will destroy northern parts of European Russia and America’s East Coast

 

Jesuits accept most of this plan, but Freemasons oppose it in various ways. So, Freemasonic endeavors in opposition to the Zionist agenda may involve the following:

 

1. various defense lines against terrorists in Syria & Iraq; support of Iran (Freemasons have infiltrated extensively the Ayatullah regime)

 

2. the re-emergence of European totalitarianism, spirituality, and imperium

 

3. the preparations for the re-establishment of the US as a genuine republican state (as conceived by the Founding Fathers) in a small part of today’s US territory, mainly in the mountainous parts of the Middle West.

 

For Greater Israel to be truly a global power, there have to take place two different types of development:

a. Israel must expand territorially while major countries of the region have to disappear

and

b. Europe, Russia and America have to be pulled into an abysmal maelstrom of destruction, contraction, and insignificance

 

It seems there are two diverse options for Russia’s & America’s contraction, one being the aforementioned, ‘contained’ nuclear war, and the other involving

 

i. extraordinary natural disasters occurring in both, the eastern and the western extremities of the US and

 

ii. ‘color revolution’ against Kremlin.

 

In any case, great importance is given so that the area around Samara, Astrakhan, and the northern shores of the Caspian Sea is always protected.

 

The reason for this is that the local population in that region is not Russian, truly speaking, but Khazarian; there lies the epicenter of the Zionist Khazarian conspiracy.

 

Naive commentators, who express doubts about the veracity of the Greater Israel agenda, ask how Israel with its present, limited population can occupy vast lands of Syria, Iraq, Jordan, NW Saudi Arabia, and Egypt that are today inhabited by more than 100 million people!

 

Those commentators don’t know that a second ‘aliyah’ can take place (like that of the year 1945-1948) and 15-20 million ‘hidden’ ‘Jews’ (in reality: Khazarians presently impersonating Russians) can move to live in the Saudi Red Sea coast north of Jeddah, in the Egyptian Red Sea coast, in Sinai and in the Syrian desert. To support this enormous movement, the vast know-how currently acquired in the Zionist Emirates (UAE) will be transferred to the said territories in order to turn the desert into a green land.

 

As per the terms of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance, the Catholic Church can transfer the Holy See to Jerusalem, if (or when) Rome, Italy and Europe collapse in anarchy, Euro-Islamist wars (I don’t call them civil wars, because Islamist immigrants are alien elements in Europe), and total chaos. This perspective is viewed as inevitable by the Jesuits – and actually by all. And by evidently contributing to Europe’s decomposition, the Jesuits only demonstrate their solidarity with the Zionists, whom they surely cheat superbly as regards the final stages of the Jesuit agenda.

 

So, the plan to unite all churches has a global appeal, whereas local level socio-economic-political-cultural-spiritual power across Europe seems to be of little interest for the Jesuits. This is not strange:

 

first, their main focus is elsewhere, and

 

second, the Jesuits know that, after Europe’s descent to disorder and chaos, the power that will rise will be Freemasonic or if you prefer Nordic-Germanic, Gnostic, Hermetic, Wagnerian, Arian (the early Christian heresy) or ‘pagan’.

 

Use whatever word you want, but it will be an anti-Catholic, anti-Orthodox, anti-Jesuit Christianity with references to Merovingian bloodline and other extra-Christian literature.

 

VI. The Rise of the New Roman (European) Empire

 

For this purpose, Freemasons need to ensure:

 

1. A low degree destruction in the Middle East, which will also involve the following:

– preservation of Iran,

– creation of ‘Kurdistan’ on only Iraqi, Syrian and Turkish territories,

– formation of a Sunni central Iraqi state,

– emergence of a Shia state in South Iraq and the NE confines of Saudi Arabia (Dammam), and

– expansion of Jordan across NW quarter of Saudi Arabia

 

2. a. the total destruction of all democratic concepts and ideas in Europe, the formation of military groups that, after the fight against and the elimination of the Islamists, will rise to absolute power and impose a Freemasonic, pseudo-Christian, European Imperial state that will look closer to Mithraic Iranian Arsacid Empire, to Gnostic-Hermetic Christianity, and to Hyperborean cults and traditions.

 

2. b. During the forthcoming chaos across Europe, the Freemasons will spearhead the destruction of Rome and the conversion of most of the Christian churches in Western, Central and Northern Europe into pseudo-Christian Freemasonic temples. So, at that stage, the tactical interests of the Freemasons and the Zionists will converge again.

 

Another factor related to the destruction of Rome, which can also explain why the Jesuits seem indifferent to this forthcoming event, is the perplex phenomenon of the Fatima apocalyptic visions (six apparitions from 13th May to 13th October 1917) and the associated Miracle of Sun. In spite of the terrible measures taken to prevent the diffusion of the truth and despite the enormous volumes of lies spread on this subject by the official Catholic Church in order to confuse and disorient every concerned explorer, many came to know that the Fatima apocalyptic visions do actually concern the end of the Catholic Church as we have known it until now.

 

So, I conclude that the Jesuits realized (particularly after the end of WW II) that the overall sociopolitical and cultural developments across Europe would make Traditional Catholic and Protestant Christianity irrevocably unsustainable in Rome, Italy & Europe, and they therefore shaped their End Times plans accordingly.

 

3. the decadence of Russia (options of ‘color revolution’ or other type of turmoil are under discussion, but not the ‘contained’ nuclear war option) and the implosion of the US (following economic collapse rather than natural disaster, although Freemasons too seem to believe that some type of East Coast natural disaster is inevitable). Following the collapse of central authority (or the submersion of Washington D.C. or the destruction caused by the limited and ‘contained’ nuclear war), the different parts of the elite will live in underground cities or secluded territories. Then, vast lands of today’s American territory will plunge in chaos and they will be ruled by local thugs and gangsters. However, some form of republican state with public order and discipline will emerge in the mountainous parts of the American Middle West.

 

The New Roman-European Empire will be a totalitarian state compared to which Hitler’s Germany would look like a liberal-anarchical spot. To its citizens, it will be a very happy realm, because practically speaking the outright majority of the indigenous European population, previously outraged because of the Islamists’ unprecedented barbarism, will support the anti-Islamist and anti-Jewish resistance, struggle, and victory of the brave European fighters.

 

The end result will be that they will get rid of all troubles, because the great warriors will exterminate all Islamists, Jews (Sephardic or Ashkenazi Khazarians), leftists, homosexuals, liberal-socialists, and other dissident elements. To imagine how terrible the next European war will be, one must consider approximately 50 million people dead from the borders of Russia to the Atlantic in a period of 3-4 years; some cities will surely look worse than Syria’s Aleppo.

 

However, this shocking situation will bring forth splendid results: materialism, consumerism, hedonism and pacifism will have disappeared – along with humanism. The era that started with Copernicus will have ended in Europe. The imperial rise will be very fast, because spiritual powers, techniques, and endeavors will be pursued, and demonic hierarchies will highly contribute to the restoration of the Anti-(Pseudo-)Christian order and authority. A new technology will appear that will be spiritual rather than material of nature. Europe will then believe in  forms of Mithraism, Gnostic Christianity, and Arianism that were thought to have been irreversibly uprooted back in the 4th century.

 

The rise of the European Empire will be simultaneous with the fall of Greater Israel and the final disarray of the Muslim World from Mauritania to India. With America’s, Russia’s, India’s, and Israel’s power decreasing, the purified European Empire will be a meteoric phenomenon and the leader of the struggle against the Islamist immigrants and the erratic Jews will be catapulted to absolute power. This person will be very different from the common, materialistic leaders and fake Messiahs of the Zionists and the Muslims.

 

Europe’s power will spread across Africa, Latin America, and large parts of Asia. Islam will be abolished, and for some time it will look as if it totally disappeared. Israel will disintegrate, and a peace will be imposed among local populations of different backgrounds as the only means to survive; the real Third Temple will be built then, because the earlier built Zionist edifice will be a fake replica. The Third Temple will be indeed Satan’s temple par excellence. The European Emperor will first be called divine (in imitation of Ancient Roman titulary) and then worshipped as god. He will be the Final False Christ, the ‘Antichrist’.

 

This will be an era of major natural disasters and several parts of the Earth will disappear following catastrophic earthquakes, enormous tsunamis, and calamitous sidereal phenomena. It will also be a time a nefarious diseases rapidly spread across vast territories and with many hundreds of millions of dead (“He will destroy many in a time of peace”). The Zionists will have almost disappeared, but this will not be the same for the Jesuits.

 

It goes without saying that Official Christianity either Roman Catholic or Eastern Roman Orthodox will be persecuted and uprooted as Satanic heresy across the European Empire.

999.jpg

VII. Jesuit Christianity and its Survival at the times of the European Empire

 

Where will the main center of the Jesuits be located at those days? In the countries toward which their focus has already shifted, but the world’s media -deliberately or due to oversight- ignore this remarkable change.

 

In fact, the brief and straight answer to the original question (as expressed in the second paragraph of this article) is this:

After the end of WW II, the Jesuits have concluded that

a. Europe is definitely rotten

b. Christianity in Europe is irreversibly dead

c. their power in Europe will never ever rise again

d. Europe will be controlled either by Freemasons or Zionists to its end

e. it makes therefore no sense to Jesuits to oppose the Zionist agenda in Europe, since even if they achieve to avert it, their power will not increase, and at the end the Anti-Christian Freemasons will prevail.

f. at the present moment, because of the aforementioned, and despite the Freemasonic interest in setting up an immense empire headquartered somewhere in Central-Northern Europe, it looks like all three major secret societies, Freemasonry, Societas Jesu, and the Zionist Khazarians, want to see the present European structure destroyed – each for different reasons.

 

(((This does not mean that their puppets – Freemason Holland, Zionist Sarkozy, Jesuit Fillon, Jesuits Anthony Blair and Theresa May, Freemasons Gordon Brown & David Cameron, Freemasons Francois Mitterrand, Helmut Kohl, and Jacques Chirac, Jesuit Angela Merkel, and others – want to truly and consciously destroy their homeland, as many people may imagine mistakenly. All the statesmen and politicians, who belong to today’s European political microcosm, believe that they contribute to the improvement of the socioeconomic conditions and to the elimination of the major problems. This is the result a. of the nature of our world, b. of the overwhelming deception that applies across the board and at all levels, and c. of the function of the three secret and hierarchical societies to which all these persons belong. The initiation to another, higher degree always means partly rejection of earlier beliefs, assumptions and understandings; or to put it otherwise, these secret societies’ superior members always keep the lower members misinformed or uninformed.)))

 

g. consequently, the Jesuits – already before many decades – knew that they had to put all their stakes on one (or more) strong, ancient, coherent, yet politically deceived and disoriented nation that had not yet been Christened. You certainly understand immediately that I mean China.

 

Today, in South Korea, all Christian denominations total around 30-35% among the indigenous people. In Japan, a great part of folk Shinto lean to various branches of Christianity. The same occurs in Taiwan where many non-religious people turn to different Christian churches. More importantly, in China, Buddhists total 18%, Christians are around 5%, and the unaffiliated make more than half the population, with many converting to Christianity every day.

 

These countries are the main focus of the Jesuits; they expect a great return to religion and spirituality when an economic collapse will bring despair to the outright majority of the population in all these countries. When bloody conflicts and devastating wars, nightmarish diseases, ominous famines, and unique natural disasters will be hitting the rest of the world, China will rise as the Christian country par excellence.

 

That’s why the Freemasons try to compromise this perspective by deliberately contributing to the worsening of the relations between North Korea and South Korea, and to the degradation of the relations between China and the US, so that if there has to be a limited, ‘contained’ nuclear war, this takes place between China and the US, and not between Russia and the US. That’s why we hear rumors of wars coming from one or the other side of the Eurasiatic landmass.

 

VIII. The demise of the Anti-Christian Roman Empire

 

For this purpose, Jesuits need to ensure:  

1. the advance of the Zionist agenda in the Middle East

 2. the advance of the Zionist and the Freemasonic agendas in Europe

 3. the mutual regression of Russia and America

 4. the successful rise of the European Empire under the Antichrist; in the first part of his rule, they will not oppose / challenge him. They expect the Two Prophets to appear as soon as he has the Third Temple erected, and then they will start opposing him.

 

Jesuits know very well that it is their own task to prepare a Chinese army of 200 million soldiers and turn it against the European Emperor – Antichrist, when he will encircle China and East Asia from all parts. They expect that moment to come with the end of the Two Prophets’ ministry and Jesus’ Second Coming. But this is wrong and, although they play their game at the long-run and they are therefore superior to the rest, they will only cheat themselves. Their end will be even more spectacular.

 

Now, who Jesus will be, how he will first appear, how he will engulf his enemies into their own traps, who will stand by him, who will oppose -and how- the Antichrist, this is another, very vast, topic.

 

However, the idea of just a frontal battle between two persons is really childish and inconsistent with the Christian texts to say the least. By this, I don’t limit the topic to just few false Christs, the Antichrist, the False Prophet, the Two Prophets, and Jesus.

 

There will also be many other persons who will play a very important role. Already the Book of the Revelation (ch. 14) speaks of two different persons: the Lamb and the 144000 virgin soldiers (verses 1-5) and the End times King, someone “like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head”, who will eliminate the sinful and the evil (verses 14-19). Believing that the two persons are one is sheer distortion, and this confusion has been spread by many theologians related to all three aforementioned secret societies.

 

The number of important persons expected to appear at the End of Times is not limited in the aforementioned; in Matthew XII, 41-42, Jesus states that, on Judgment Day, Assyrians (“men of Nineveh“) will come back to engage in battle against “this generation(sheer reference to the evil, Maccabee-origin Pharisees whom he rejected).

 

Further on, Jesus mentions an entire southern (Queen of South) nation that will emerge at the same time to also oppose and fight against “this generation”. This nations’ magistrates will also be key persons of the End times.

 

That is to say, most of today interpreters, irrespective of denomination or religion, try to adjust their holy texts to their desires and wishes, be they theological or political, and in the process they strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

 

Now, what the Kalergi plan is, why a Freemason envisioned it, what his intentions were, and in what he was managed and maneuvered without his choosing, this is a totally different topic basically spiritual of nature.

 

However, despite ‘his’ false claims, Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi did not originate from the Eastern Roman nobility; neither the Cretan Kallergis family (of which he was an offspring) did. Many Greeks, who moved to Tsarist Russia in the late 18th and early 19th c., were impressed by, and envied, Russian nobility; so, when they returned to their Ottoman-occupied homeland, they brought with them the myth and the falsely risen claims of Eastern Roman Imperial nobility. Now, whether Richard Nikolaus knew that his family’s claims were fake and unsubstantiated or not, this is anyone’s guess. As a matter of fact, Kallergis family members had risen those claims for at least a century, before Richard Nikolaus was born.

 

 

—————————

Note

* Robert Reyvolt in Incendiary Radio w/ Robert Reyvolt – April 2, 2017 Hour 2 http://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/incendiary-radio-w-robert-reyvolt-april-2-2017-hour-2/

 

 

 

 

What Egypt needs now – Part II. An Existential Threat must be Thwarted

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

In an earlier article titled ‘What Egypt needs now – Part I, Sinai’, I suggested a series of measures that the Egyptian government must take immediately to make sure that civil order and concord will prevail in the area and nationwide. These measures are expected to thwart an existential threat against Egypt’s national integrity. The existing threat is very real and the dangers tremendous. In the present article, I will reveal covert insinuations made by a key Israeli minister, proceeding through textual analysis. These hints do not augur well for Egypt’s territorial integrity and must therefore be taken very seriously.

When Supreme Forces are pushing to Change Borders….

Bernard Lewis map

The first reactions of the Egyptian government seem good, but very limited, short-termed, and rather atrophic. Egypt must be out of the process of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations; this is true and correct for all intents and purposes. One can even say that there was no need for such carnage so that finally an Egyptian government understands that the country’s position is in Africa and not in Asia, and that any sort of involvement in Palestinian, Levantine or Asiatic troubles does not bode well for Egypt’s interests, perspectives and future.

Establishing a buffer zone is certainly a good measure, but it will bring only minimal results; the last bomb explosion was a false flag attack, and the criminal Zionist state is the only to be held responsible for this. Any sound mind can assess this reality immediately. As irrevocable conclusion, it is even corroborated by the texts and the articles of the Zionist press – if they are attentively read and scrupulously interpreted.

For the Egyptian government, accusing Hamas for the tragic incident has only one useful dimension, namely to deceive the Israelis by pretending that the Egyptian government does not believe that the responsible was ultimately the Zionist state. This dimension would certainly make sense.

However, for any Egyptian authority to truly believe that it was carried out by a Hamas unit in cooperation with local elements is tantamount to suicide. The reason for this is the fact that it was not Hamas, but Israel, and this will be proved correct, because the measures taken, if they are not accompanied by must greater and more systematic measures (like those suggested in my previous article) will fail to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Worse, if the measures I suggested in my earlier article (https://megalommatis.wordpress.com/2014/10/26/what-egypt-needs-now-part-i-sinai/) are not taken as soon as possible, Israel will take the destabilizing game deep inside Egypt, and similar tragic incidents will be reproduced in the greater Cairo area and in Upper Egypt. The reason for this is very simple; Israel has already established a highly sophisticated network of agents across the country (without most of them even knowing that they are working for the Zionist state) and, in addition, has stored in many locations across the Sinai Peninsula material that is necessary for the false flag attacks that the Mossad intends to carry out across Egypt.

It takes only a deep understanding of the Language of Falsehood (which is as real as English, Arabic, Russian and any other linguistic entity) in order to interpret correctly the Zionist ministers’, generals’, academics’ and journalists’ speeches and thus understand that Egypt is directed targeted now.

A brilliant example is offered by the filthy pig Moshe Ya’alon – who should be mercilessly lynched and literarily dismembered alive for scores of Crimes against the Mankind. The Israeli minister of Military Affairs said in a recent interview with the US-based National Public Radio (NPR) that the current borders of many Middle Eastern countries are bound to change in the future as a result of recent developments in the region.

He then went on offering his paranoid logic about the development and specifying the following: “Libya was a new creation, a Western creation as a result of World War I. Syria, Iraq, the same — artificial nation-states — and what we see now is a collapse of this Western idea,” he stated. Feeling the need to best cover his intentions, he also added the following: “We have to distinguish between countries like Egypt, with their history. Egypt will stay Egypt”.

For someone so well prepared to be the top gangster of the criminal Zionist entity (the Fake State of Israel), i.e. the minister of Military Affairs, Modern Political History is a perfectly well studied subject, and to him all the events are known in foremost accuracy.

On this occasion, a shrewd commentator expressed a great part of irony as regards Moshe Ya’alon’s interview, epitomizing the truth as per below:
“The minister did not say whether the borders of Israel, also drawn by Western powers after World War I, would change or not ” (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/10/24/middle-east-borders-bound-to-change-israel-minister/).

Moshe Ya’alon (born Smilansky – of Ukrainian father) fought as a reservist in the Yom Kippur war (1973) and “on October 15, 1973, his unit became the first IDF unit to cross the Suez Canal into Egypt. He continued fighting as part of the Israeli drive into the Egyptian mainland, and participated in the encirclement of the Egyptian Third Army” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moshe_Ya%27alon).

And this is Neo-Nazi gangster Ya’alon’s latest racist measure and policy:
http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/segregated-bussing-plan-for-palestinians-and-jews/

What did the Smilansky Ashkenazi Khazarian pig really say in his interview?

First, what are the ‘recent developments’ due to which borders will change across the region as per Ya’alon words? One might suggest that he refers to what happens currently in Iraq and Syria with the emergence of the Fake Caliphate. But no, this is wrong. The inner structure of his thought makes it clear that he includes Libya into this subject (‘the recent developments’); so we can safely claim that to him ‘recent developments’ is a code term for what is rather called across the global mass media as ‘Arab Spring’. So, we conclude that, when he says that ‘the recent developments’ will bring about ‘changes of borders’, Moshe Ya’alon includes Egypt, since the country was deeply affected by the Arab Spring covert operations.

But the gangster minister said much more in his interview, fully demonstrating that he views the country of the Nile as a candidate for the forthcoming border changes; in any case, ‘many’ countries are subject to this perspective, according to Ya’alon’s words.

Allusions are highly revered literary schemes in the Language of Falsehood that Zionists and Freemasons speak without the rest being able to decipher their covert messages and hints. Do you have a doubt that Moshe Ya’alon, except from being a Zionist, is also a Freemason? The picture published in the aforementioned entry of the Wikipedia (which certainly has his approval and definitely incorporates his recommendations) shows him with his Canadian and English counterparts, Rob Nicholson and Chuck Hagel, in a typically Freemasonic gesture of shaking hands (picture retrieved as of today).

Yaalon Nicholson Hagel

What is the allusion embedded in Ya’alon aforementioned interview?

He said: “Libya was a new creation, a Western creation as a result of World War I”. This is of course wrong! Totally wrong! Libya was detached from the Ottoman Empire by Italy during their 1911 war, which occurred 3 years before WW I started.

Now, if you believe that Moshe Ya’alon simply made a mistake or did not know what he was talking about, you are an idiot, and you should immediately stop reading the present text, because it will be worthless to you.

So, Libya was not ‘a Western creation as a result of World War I’.

This means that when Ya’alon continued saying ‘Syria, Iraq, the same — artificial nation-states — and …’, he already knew very well that Syria and Iraq were not detached from the Ottoman Empire in the ‘same’ way as Libya. Why did he make then this mistake?

A first approach may be for any interpreter and analyst to think that the Israeli minister wanted to insinuate that Libya’s borders will change pretty much like those of Syria and Iraq, which have already de facto changed due to the emergence of the Fake Caliphate.

But if this were his intention, Ya’alon would stop there. As he did not, and went on involving other countries as well, we can be sure that Libya was not the point he wanted to make.

So, in fact, establishing a wrong parallel between Libya and Syria-Iraq was not a proper mistake for Ya’alon, but it served him as an allusion.

– To what did Libya serve him as an allusion?

– Evidently to what Ya’alon would never say explicitly.

– How can we identify the object of his allusion?

– By searching for further elements in his interview namely countries that are possible candidates for border change; in this regard, Syria and Iraq are automatically excluded, because the change has already occurred in their cases.

– What further element is left in Ya’alon’s interview?

– Egypt.

However, in his interview, Ya’alon makes about Egypt an interesting juxtaposition; he says: ‘we have to distinguish between countries like Egypt, with their history. Egypt will stay Egypt’.

This appears to be in contrast with what was previously said about Syria, Iraq and Libya, namely that
1. they are ‘artificial nation-states’, and
2. in their case we see now ‘a collapse of this Western idea’.

The top rule of the Falsehood Language is ‘never to say the truth in public’; the second rule is the same said reversely, namely ‘to always say a lie in public’.

The fact that what Ya’alon says about Egypt in his interview is a lie we can understand through close examination of his words that reveal plenty of inconsistencies and inaccuracies.

What are “countries like Egypt, with their history”?

If this was said comparatively to Libya only, it would perhaps draw some importance. Libya was never the heartland of huge empires, important kingdoms or expanding caliphates. However, when countries like Syria and Iraq are involved in the discourse, the statement becomes meaningless and worthless, futile, erroneous, and therefore suspicious. Syria and Iraq have a greater historical past than Egypt.

A brief historical comparison involves the following:
1- the earlier beginning of civilization and writing in Mesopotamia – Sumer (around 300 years before Egypt),

2- the greater political – military expansion and cultural radiation of Mesopotamia – Akkad, Assyria and Babylonia (covering more than two millennia),

3- the equal importance of both lands at the times of the Seleucid and Ptolemaic empires (Alexander’s Epigones),

4- the equal importance of the two respective theological schools (Antioch in Roman Syrian and Alexandria in Roman Egypt) within Christianity, and last,

5- the far greater role for Syria and Iraq within the context of Islamic History (Damascus and Baghdad were far more influential than Cairo in any aspect).

Finally, both territories (Syria – Iraq & Egypt) became part of the Ottoman Empire at the same time (early 16th c.) and were detached in the same manner (colonial, Anglo-French detachment).

We can therefore conclude that this is totally false, and when said by a top Israeli military, it consists only in a useful lie.

The same concerns for the term used for Syria, Iraq and Libya, namely ‘a new creation’ and ‘artificial nation-states’. In fact, Libya and Egypt were fabricated in exactly the same manner: colonial interference and detachment from the Islamic Caliphate – Ottoman Empire whereto both lands belonged.

In fact, if there is a contrast among the four countries mentioned by the Israeli minister, i.e. Libya, Egypt, Syria and Iraq, we have on one side Egypt and Libya (detached during direct foreign, colonial interference / pretty much like Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti, Morocco, Aden, Oman, Emirates) and on the other side Syria and Iraq (invaded and occupied during WW I as consequence of the fact that the Ottoman Empire and England were members of opposite alliances / pretty much like Lebanon, Palestine, ‘Jordan’, Arabia, Yemen, Kuwait and Qatar).

If Libya is ‘a new creation’ (1911), so is Egypt (1798) too.

If Libya, Syria, and Iraq are ‘artificial nation-states’, so is Egypt too.

One may eventually hypothesize that the Israeli minister referred to the different ethnic-religious groups attested in the case of Syria and Iraq (Sunni, Shia, ‘Kurds’, Turkmen, Aramaeans, Yazidis and others). However, this is not attested in Libya whereby homogeneity is greater (there are only Berber-speaking and Arabic-speaking Libyans), and yet the Israeli minister categorized Libya with Syria and Iraq.

One understands how intriguing the Israeli minister can become, if one takes into consideration that ethnic-religious groups exist in Egypt as well, namely Berbers in the West, Bedouins in the Sinai (systemically called ‘Arabs’ by the Zionist state – and this is both false and fallacious), Nubians and Beja in the South, and in addition, Christians (erroneously called Copts – in fact, all Egyptians are Copts), Sunni and Shia Muslims.

So, if so many elements of Minister Ya’alon’s interview are false, what did he want to say?

The answer is simple.

It is all about an allusion that he wanted to make.

First, he made it clear that the Zionist state and the forces that support it want a definite change of borders in the Middle East. This does not concern Syria and Iraq anymore, because there border change has already occurred. In addition, Minister Ya’alon did not limit his discourse to only that area where he could eventually specify details (about ‘Kurdistan’, etc.) without however referring to other countries.

Second, he used Libya as an allusion to many aspects that characterize Egypt in the way the Zionist state views the country of the Nile (: new creation, Western creation, artificial nation-state, collapse of the underlying Western idea).

Third, he denied the truth that is hidden in the backside of his mind, by excluding Egypt from the picture. In fact, no one asked Minister Ya’alon to exclude Egypt from the picture. He could have just avoided any mention. He could have mentioned Yemen, Arabia or other countries instead, but in this case he would have not conveyed the message he wanted to convey to his Freemasonic and Zionist audiences across the Earth.

This automatically suggests that, if we want to understand him clearly, we have to conclude that he basically referred to Egypt as the next target for border change.

However, it would be a mistake to imagine that the rogue gangster who impersonates Israel’s Minister of Military Affairs is the only person to use this terminology and these figures of speech in order to convey similar messages. The Israeli is press and mass media in general are full of examples of similar insinuations and hints – on daily basis.

For their criminal interests and genocidal plans, it is only normal that they do their best to confuse the picture and mislead the Egyptian authorities. The Sinai Peninsula has become an urgent affair for the Zionist state. This is at least what the recent articles of professional liars and forgers like Elhanan Miller and Avi Issacharoff reconfirm (http://www.timesofisrael.com/egypt-suspends-hamas-israel-talks-following-sinai-attack/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=6b82096a7c-2014_10_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-6b82096a7c-54783545 and http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-woes-of-an-egyptian-churchill/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=6b82096a7c-2014_10_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-6b82096a7c-54783545).

It is therefore high time for the Egyptian administration to take all measures needed in order to totally block the Zionist infiltrators and agents out of the Sinai, and thus preserve the country’s territorial integrity.

Scotland, ‘Civic Nation’, ‘Ethnic Nation’, and the Search for National Identity and Independence

4724123 mgsEBO0

By Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

The modern European concept of ‘nation’ triggered ceaseless wars and interminable conflicts over the past two centuries. But was there only one modern European concept of ‘nation’? Certainly not!

Nation – a modern term with no ancient parallels

The word ‘nation’ existed in all major ancient languages that we deciphered, but it did not always have the same meaning and resonance. As we see it, it was very common for several populations that belonged to the same nation to be organized in different states. This was already typified in the world’s first civilization, the Sumerians – an exemplary case.

Before the formation of Ancient Egypt as a state around 3000 BCE, for no less than 500 years we attest the early organization and development of the first Sumerian cities-states, namely Eridu, Ur, Uruk, Larsa, Kish, Lagash, Isin, Shuruppak, etc.

The same situation is observed 2000-2500 years later among the Phoenicians, when Tyr, Sidon, Arwad, Byblos, Beirut and other states-kingdoms coexisted for hundreds of years, at times peacefully and at times at war.

The Assyrians and the Babylonians, both descendents of the Akkadians who were the earliest Semites to form an empire with Akkad (Agade) as capital in the 24th and 23rd centuries BCE, were apparently the first nation in the world to be divided on religious, cultural and ideological grounds. This started happening at the very end of the 3rd millennium BCE.

The phenomenon was repeated in Ancient Egypt, and there too we have noticed great examples of national division due to religious, cultural and ideological grounds; the post-Ramesside period (at the beginning of the 11th c. BCE) is plenty of divisions. For centuries, Egypt was divided and ruled by two or even three parallel dynasties; the 8th – 7th c. BCE clash between the Napatan – Kushitic – Sudanese dynasty (called ‘Ethiopian’ by the Ancient Egyptian Historian Manetho) and the Western Delta dynasty (that Manetho called ‘Libyan’) reflect different readings of the Ancient Egyptian Heritage to which were willingly ascribed the peripheral nations the Berber ‘Lybians’ of Egypt’s western confines and the Kushites-Ethiopians of today’s Sudanese North (who were totally unrelated to the modern Abyssinian tribes that peremptorily and fallaciously use the name of Ethiopia for their country).

Among Ancient Greeks, the extent of the division was such that even among the same tribe’s people (Ionians, Aeolians, etc.) there were several small cities-states formed.

The word ‘nation’ in English is borrowed successively from Old French, and Latin. The original Latin word ‘natio’ meant first ‘native’ (someone relevant to his/her birthplace) only to be progressively extended to all the natives of a place as a group.

At this point it is essential to state that the confusion currently existing in English between the words ‘nation’ and ‘state’ or ‘nation’ and ‘country’ does NOT exist in other languages; in English, at times, ‘nation’ means ‘state’ or ‘country’ and a lot of misunderstanding is due to this confusion, which is highly advisable never to make. Consequently, it is important to clarify at this point that, throughout the present article, the word ‘nation’ is NOT considered as synonym of the words ‘state’ and ‘country’.

This is of primordial importance, and we need to always take it into consideration. In fact, the prevalent concept is that of an indigenous people. Only this concept makes of the term ‘nation’ a real, original value in Humanities; this is due to the fact that the term describes an indigenous community of humans. The term ‘country’ in its origin is purely geographical of context; it means land. Perhaps for several religions, a particular land or piece of land may be considered as sacred or holy, but this approach does never cover all lands and places that appeared as the result of the Creation.

Similarly, the term ‘state’ denotes the governmental mechanism that exists within some well demarcated borderlines. However, there has never been a state to have any value – except that given to it by either humans (the indigenous nation) or God (in Whose Name the state in question may have been established).

Within the context of modern disciplines of Ancient History and Political Science, there has been a long discussion about the main traits and the real essence of a nation. Several authors tried to identify what the concept of ‘nation’ meant to various ancient nations. Quite unfortunately, in doing so, most of the scholars projected their own, contemporary, views and viewpoints onto the ancient texts that they collected to study. The result is therefore untrustworthy,

What is even more unfortunate is the fact that, in Modern Times, the term ‘nation’ did not mean the same thing to all philosophers, political theorists, ideologists and historians – so, every effort to examine what ‘nation’ meant in the Antiquity was definitely linked with the concept of nation each modern author had in his/her mind.

In this regard, Azar Gat was very wrong in viewing in Ancient Egypt the world’s ‘first national state’ that was formed ‘quite early as a unified state, congruent with a distinct people of shared ethnicity’. That is utterly nonsensical! The idiotic Israeli author does not in fact refer to a ‘nation’ but to a ‘national state’, which is a state properly speaking, so irrelevant to the nation itself!

Even worse, there was no one distinct people in Ancient Egypt but many; we don’t actually know how they viewed their participation in their ‘nation’ and how differently they viewed the many ethnic components of their country.

In addition, for several Ancient Egyptian religious doctrines, the Ancient Egyptian gods originated from Napata, the Kushitic-Sudanese capital near today’s Karima, more than 750 km alongside the Nile south of today’s Egyptian – Sudanese borders. For some time, this was a mere religious belief. However, in the beginning of the New Empire (1st half of the 16th c. BCE), this belief became the cornerstone of Imperial Egypt’s Kushitic irredentism, and of the subsequent annexation of North Sudan (what the Ancient Greeks and Romans called ‘Ethiopia’) by Ahmose and Thutmose I.

It is also wrong to hypothesize like Steven Grosby that the small Canaanite states of Israel, Ammon, Moab and Edom underwent a process of nation-formation as result of the Assyrian expansion that led to their subordination to Nineveh. This approach is due exclusively to unrestrained projection of modern theoretical and political viewpoints onto the study topic of the said scholar.

Similarly, Edward Cohen’s irrelevant conclusion that ancient Athens met all modern definitions of nationhood is merely due to this author’s wrong conception of the term ‘nation’ – which he later projected onto his study subject.

Nation – a modern term with two diametrically opposite concepts

 

In modern times, all possible efforts of conceptualization, identification and contextualization of the term ‘nation’ originate from two diametrically opposed concepts.

Civic nation

First comes the ‘civic nation’ theory which is a vicious distortion fabricated during the formation of Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract concept (first discussed in his homonymous book in 1762). As he never studied History and in addition was an innovative thinker, J. J. Rousseau had a total disregard of History itself. In addition, he was characterized by an absolute ignorance of the historical nations as they had existed over millennia; in Rousseau’s fictional, unreal, and at times monstrous world, a nation was just a mass population that he should fix as per his silly ideas that he had shaped without taking into account the real wishes and feelings, desires and ideas, traditions and beliefs of any nation whatsoever.

The ceaseless wars that ensued from the French Revolution, and most of the bloodshed occurred across the Earth over the past 250 years are to be credited to Rousseau’s noxious ideas and philosophical system which was an incredible and inhuman aberration of sick ego(t)istic background.

For Rousseau, what matters in a community of people is the formation of a state, which is to be politically legitimate only through the active participation of the entire population, i.e. the citizens of the country. The cynical, absolute and Macchiavellistic ‘general will’ is all that matters in this regard, and this was quite accentuated in later reconsiderations of the concept of ‘civic nation’. This approach draws however from other philosophical systems and theoretical traditions, notably rationalism and liberalism.

In reality, when it comes to the notion of ‘civic nation’, the real identity of a nation does not matter. The ‘nation’ is not viewed as a historical development and reality, but as a group of gangsters with a common will, few materialistic targets, and therefore only target-appended ‘opinions’ as regards the social organization. For this reason, membership of the civic nation is simply voluntary. In fact, many people originating from different nations can gather together in an uninhabited place and …. thus shape a ‘nation’. Unfortunately, the real problems start when these gangsters do not settle in an uninhabited place, but forcefully remove the indigenous nation of a targeted region, thus creating two nations on the same place, one legal (the indigenous one) and one illegal (the ‘civic’ nation of the gangsters).

It is therefore correct to conclude that a ‘civic nation’ is a fake nation indeed.

Why and how all this came out of the mind of a Swiss philosopher who died in France to be posthumously reburied in Pantheon at Paris after the French revolution? To take J. J. Rousseau as per his own words, he thought that through imagination he could reconstitute the History of the Mankind; of course, this thought constitutes in itself an aberration. In the uselessly venerated Discourse on Inequality (1754), he wrote ” The first man who, having fenced in a piece of land, said “This is mine,” and found people naïve enough to believe him, that man was the true founder of civil society”; quite unfortunately for Rousseau and his theories, things did not happen that way, but this was impossible for him to know.

It was actually impossible to form any idea about this subject in the middle of the 18th c., when no Sumerian, no Egyptian Hieroglyphic, no Elamite and no Akkadian texts were deciphered, let alone studied. The only historical past to which J. J. Rousseau had access through modern translations was Ancient Rome and Greece; but these civilizations were too late if compared with the Oriental civilizations (Mesopotamia, Egypt, Canaan, Anatolia) where the first human societies were formed as we now know. In addition, J. J. Rousseau never studied the History of India, Central Asia, and China, while he was fully unaware of the then existing early accounts of the pre-Columbian, indigenous civilizations of Mexico and the Andes. Finally, his contempt for the Christian and Islamic cultures and heritage that existed in his time only deprived him from the reality of the historical continuity and finally drove him to baseless theories that lacked any solid background. His ‘philosophy’ was a fully useless and absolutely unrealistic bunch of assumptions as to just how to create a new ‘human being’ in full rejection of the historical mankind.

Like most of the world’s philosophers, J. J. Rousseau was the child of his time, and this means that he was submerged in news and accounts, reports and narrations about settler colonies, such as the Western European establishments in the area of today’s Canada, United States, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and South Africa. One must take into consideration that when J. J. Rousseau was writing, Australia was still an unknown and undiscovered land. These Western European colons were in their outright majority heretics, gangsters and renegades of their own civilization that they had abandoned in order to settle in other continents in vain search of profit, exploitation, and material treasures. These desolate colon settlements, deprived of humanity and morality, full of racism against and hatred for the normal, human, indigenous societies, and passionate for unadulterated crime, merciless exploitation of the others, and discriminatory supremacism, offered J. J. Rousseau his study scope and soon became his model for an ideal society whereby freedom, tolerance, equality and individual rights should prevail. This was an oxymoron! He was simply unable to see that his ideas did not fit the European colons’ feelings and desires, and that he had to search for a model elsewhere. The ensued disaster was quite disproportionate.

Modern theoreticians view this ‘civic nation’ as a ‘non-xenophobic’ form of nationalism, because there is no apparent discrimination among the settlers / citizens of the ‘new’ society as regards their origin; Poles who forget Polish culture, Danes who forget Danish culture, and Dutch who forget Dutch culture are equally welcome in a settler colony; but their all white aliens in Asia, Africa, ‘America’ and ‘Australia’. However, both, modern theoreticians and J. J. Rousseau disregarded totally the reality that these settler colonies gravely and discriminately disrupted the pre-existing order of indigenous, non-white societies and civilizations and that, due to the villainous and criminal identity of the settlers, the disruption of the pre-existing order very often entailed an unprecedented bloodshed or even a multifaceted genocide of disproportionate dimensions. In reality, the ‘civic nation’ is a counterfeit nation, an evil human fabrication, and a vicious immoral order.

No positive outcome can ever originate from the aforementioned rudimentary concepts. In reality, as much tolerant as these civic nations proved to be internally, so intolerant they have been externally. The intolerant character demonstrated by civic nations either to the indigenous nations in whose territories the civic nations were criminally founded (in cases like Canada, US, Australia, etc.) or to other, ‘ethnic nations’ in other parts of the world (like the African Somalis, Oromos and Berbers or the Aramaeans, the Azeris and the Baluch in Asia) reached several times the level of racist paroxysm.

It is not therefore strange that, almost one century after J. J. Rousseau, the adaptation of his civic nation theory by Ernest Renan produced a chain of catastrophic byproducts ranging from the Nazi Reich and the Soviet Union, to China’s Cultural Revolution state and the (under preparation) global state of the so-called New World Order.

Ethnic nation

In striking contrast with the fake concept of ‘civic nation’, ‘ethnic nation’ is the real, historical nation, as it existed throughout centuries and millennia. By themselves and not through the involvement of an external factor, nations feature a common language, origin, religion, culture, and behavioral system.

History demonstrates that, on the basis of the aforementioned fundamental traits, nations can be identified unequivocally; because they represent a common communal feeling of distinct identity, true nations (i.e. ‘ethnic nations’) tend naturally and automatically to function as self-determined entities.

The ‘ethnic nation’, e.g. the historical nation, has been the only generator and promoter of historical civilizations as we have known them. By definition, an ethnic nation is more difficult to manipulate, maneuver and deceive than a fake, ‘civic nation’ that can be created on the spur of the moment. The general sum of all the characteristics of an ethnic nation forms the identity of the nation, and, as this is the result of a slow process that took centuries and millennia to be formed, it is practically impossible to extirpate.

In modern times, Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762 – 1814) made the most convincing and the most comprehensive presentation of what an ethnic nation is. In his venerated Addresses to the German Nation, he revealed the concept of national identity in all its dimensions when forming the exemplary term ‘Germanness’ which has ever since been reproduced in hundreds of copies, such as Romanness, Turkishness, Russianness, Oromoness, Somaliness, Tuaregness, etc.

As it is the real result of History, an ethnic nation is drastically corroborated by means of historical references, and by the ensuing concepts of diachronic existence and national identity, which has in every case several permanent, fundamental traits. To instigate feelings of German patriotism against the French occupation (under Napoleon – in 1808), Fichte referred to the Roman Historian Tacitus who, writing his Annals 1700 years before Fichte composed his flagrant speeches, exemplified German virtues and proverbial heroism.

An ethnic nation organized in a state ordinarily defines nationality as per jus sanguinis (lit. ‘the right of the blood’, i.e. descent from a member of the same nation), and not as per jus soli (lit. ‘the right of the soil’, i.e. birth in the land of the nation), which widely practiced by ‘civic nations’.

It would be wrong to assume that all historical nations are today organized as ‘ethnic nations’. The political choices of the local elites have turned several historical nations into ‘civic nations’ because this suited best their economic – political interests.

On the other hand, it would also be wrong to accept the arbitrary division made by Anthony Smith, who thought that ‘ethnic nations’ belong to non-Western concepts of nationalism as opposed to ‘civic nations’, which reflect the Western view of a settler colony that controls a demarcated territory.

The concept of ‘ethnic nation’ constitutes the rightful global approach to the historical phenomenon of a nation; it is equally Oriental and Occidental – if such division exists, which needs yet to be demonstrated. In what is peremptorily called by ‘Western’ academia as the ‘Western world’, the concept of ‘ethnic nation’ was first described by Herodotus, the Carian Historian who settled in Athens before 2500 years, on the basis of three criteria, namely
– homaimon (‘of the same blood’ / i.e. kinship, origin),

– homoglosson (‘of the same language’ / i.e. common language), and

– homotropon (‘of the same manners’ / i.e. common behavioral system, culture and religion).

However, the concept and the reality of the ‘ethnic nation’ proved to be a major stumbling block for the powers-that-be and for all those who tried to distort and deform the world as per their criminal interests, secret plans, and hidden vicious beliefs. The strength of the national identity was at times revealed as an omnipotent factor able to persistently remain unchanged and unaltered in full defiance of the world’s greatest powers, colonial armies, and diplomatic blackmails or ultimatums.

Civic nation vs. ethnic nation: the fake will always fail

The ominous fact that not all the nations of the world have the privilege to setup their own states and the gruesome reality that hundreds of nations have been monstrously obfuscated within monstrous super-national states clearly indicate that the moving force of the colonial states England, France, and the US, and the ruling administrations of the WW I – WW II Allies fully and systematically supported the concept of ‘civic nation’ and definitely opposed the existence of all ‘ethnic nations’ in many different ways.

The US: a fake nation – realm of gangsters and idiots

This is quite relevant of their nature; the US is by definition a ‘civic state’ that was formed, not as many pretend through secession from the colonial state of England but, via successive, multifaceted genocides of the indigenous nations of the vast territory of which Washington D.C. tragic-comically pretends today to be the unnecessary and unsolicited capital. In real terms of Humanity, Human History, and Humanism, the existence of the criminal state of the US is the greatest scandal and the most evil episode in the History of the Mankind.

The unpardonable acts perpetrated by all the colons, who settled in parts of America north of Mexico, against all the indigenous nations for several centuries before the inception of the US, the inexcusable fact that the decimated, dislodged, marginalized and persecuted indigenous nations were not even consulted in the process of state formation / secession by the so-called Founding Fathers, and the unforgivable attitude demonstrated against the subjugated indigenous nations in their own occupied homelands since 1783 make of the US the World History’s most criminal, most atrocious, and most Satanic institution. Religious, spiritual and philosophical jargon was invented and purposefully used in shameless texts and bogus-declarations to plaster and conceal the above reality.

It is therefore only normal that the diverse instances of the criminal state promoted the evil concept of ‘civic nation’, opposed the human concept of ‘ethnic nation’, viewed with suspicion the ethnic nations’ attitude to derive political legitimacy from their status as homelands of their populations, reviled the ethnic nations’ tendency to function protectively against colonization, occupation, persecution, deracination, racism, physical and spiritual genocide, and constantly denied the right to self-determination, independence and preservation of their National Heritage to ethnic nations peremptorily incorporated in monstrous super-national states (which is the typical case of the Oromos, the Afars, the Sidamas, and the Ogadeni Somalis in Abyssinia – Fake Ethiopia –; the Somalis, the Luo, and the Masai in Kenya; the Furis – of Darfur –, the Beja, and the Nubians in Sudan, and so on).

In a well orchestrated manner, the three colonial states of England, France and the US did their best for ethnic nations not to form a sovereign state (the case of the Azeris whose majority are still under Iranian control is quite indicative), to lose their sovereign state (if they achieved to form one – in this regard, Somalia is the most striking example), or to limit the ethnic nations’ sovereignty to a mere autonomous entity (as in Catalonia) or, even worse, to self-regulated administrative bodies within a civic state (as in Yukatan, Mexico).

France: the world’s most barbaric and inhuman tyranny

Following the so-called French revolution (1789), the establishment of the modern state of France as a ‘civic nation’ on European soil had ominous results for the entire continent and for the world. It first triggered the separation of the world into two fictional and aberrational entities, the West and the East (the Occident and the Orient), theoretically confined to perpetual fight; of course, this was a purely Manicheistic concept, and as such it turned out to be a calamitous reality and a hecatomb for Europe and the rest of the world.

France is not a nation; there is no ethnic nation named ‘France’. On French territory, there have been several ethnic nations that were forced to cohabitate: the Breton nation (Breizh – Brittany), the Bask nation (Euskaldunak), the Catalan nation (Catalunya), the Corsican nation (Corsi), the Occitan nation (lo País d’Òc), the Alsatian-Lorraine populations of the German nation (Elsaß-Lothringen), and the Frankish nation (Langue d’oïl – Standardized Oïl) of the North of today’s France. The latter was imposed as ‘civic nation’ on all the other ‘ethnic nations’ of France as per the tyrannical policies of the French revolutionaries in the 1790s.

The extinction of the subordinated ‘ethnic nations’ was evidently the primary means of survival for the ‘civic nation’ of France; the war declared against the national identity, the cultural heritage, and the native language of France’s ethnic nations other than the Frankish was without precedent in the World History.

When today’s uneducated European politicians and ignorant American statesmen speak of Turkey’s intolerant stance to Kurmanji or Zaza natives, of Iran’s prejudiced attitude against the Azeri, the Baluch and other ethnic minorities, and of Egypt’s bigoted position as regards the Copts, the Nubians, the Beja, and the Berbers, they all forget that the persecution of Breton language in France reached a unique level of paroxysm when Breton schoolchildren were ‘taught’ by the French civic state’s occupation authorities that, in the streets, it was “prohibited to speak Breton and spit on earth”. As early as 1794, the criminal gangster Bertrand Barère declared in the Committee of Public Salvation (Comité de salut public) that “federalism and superstition are speaking the dialect of Lower Brittany” in a contemptuous rejection of communal identity, religion (libeled as ‘superstition’) and language.

In fact, in the name of a democratic society, the most excruciating and brutal imposition of the Standardized Oïl language of France’s North took place, whereas the Frankish ethnic nation became the undisputed model for the new ‘civic nation’ of France. This demonstrates that the genocidal attitude of the French revolutionaries against France’s ethnic nations was similar to the disregard and the disrespect that the American gangsters showed for the subjugated and marginalized indigenous nations across the US territory.

The genocidal attitude of the French revolutionaries is very well documented indeed. Texts dating from the first years after the French Revolution reveal the extent of the deception that led to the aforementioned tyrannical attitude. Here is an example: “Monarchy had its reasons to look like Babel Tower; in Democracy, to leave the citizens ignorant of the national language and incapable of controlling the power is tantamount to high treason”.

Another example of the premeditated genocide (announced by abbot Grégoire in the Committee of Public Instruction in 1793): “In politics, it is far more important than we think to extirpate this diversity of ‘grossly idioms’ (sic!) that merely prolong the infancy of the reason and the senility of the prejudices”. His report was titled “Report on the necessity to annihilate the vernaculars and to universalize the use of the French language”. The terminology used makes even Hitler’s worst and most vicious theories and discourses grow pale.

England: the focus of evil

What the gangsters of the successive US administrations did to the indigenous nations whose territory they confiscated, and what the Frankish nation of France’s North did to all the ethnic nations that were engulfed in the abominable, tyrannical state of the Nouveau Régime, the English did to the Irish, the Scots and the Welsh. In fact, only the processes differed slightly.

English tyranny and monstrosity in Wales

For Wales (Cymru), the troubles started with the Treaty Aberconwy (1277); it was then proved that peace is not always better than the war. After numerous wars between Llewelyn ap Gruffudd and Edward I of England, the treaty granted end of hostilities, but also stipulated that after the death of the King of Wales, Welsh independence would end and the country would become part of England. The treaty was the result of the treachery of minor Welsh princes who had sided with the enemy; these potentates soon become disillusioned and started a revolt in 1282. Llewelyn ap Gruffudd led the revolt and after several battles, he rejected to abandon his nation that his forefathers had ruled since the ‘days of Kamber son Brutus’ (the heroic times’ King of Cambria that was the original name of Wales). He was killed in an ambush during the Battle of Orewin Bridge. As per the barbaric customs of the incestuous English gangsters, Llywelyn’s head was cut off, sent to London and there set up in the city pillory for a day and crowned with ivy (to dishonor the dead Welsh King as king of the outlaws) only to be later carried by a horseman on the point of his lance up to the Gate of the Satanic Tower of London where it was left for more than 15 years.

Llywelyn’s successor Dafydd continued fighting through 1283, until he was captured along with his family, transferred to England, condemned to death by the Satanic Parliament of England, and consecutively hanged, drawn and quartered (: cut into four pieces). Wales was then stripped of all royal insignia, regalia and relics, and Welsh royal properties were robbed and confiscated. The unprecedented English terror did not deter Welsh national feelings, and already in 1294 a revolt was led by Madog ap Llywelyn.

Meanwhile, the infamous Statute of Rhuddlan (1284) had imposed the alien English ‘common law’ to Wales. English authority was successively rejected by Llywelyn Bren (1316 – 1318), who led a rebellion, Owain Lawgoch, who planned twice to invade Wales with French support only to be assassinated by English agents in France (1378), and Owain Glyndwr (King of Wales / Tywysog Cymru 1400 – 1415), who repeatedly defeated the English armies and reunited Wales for some years. The villainous English did not succeed to capture him, and despite the mythical sums of money they promised, they failed to find one Welsh ready to betray Owain Glyndwr, who had opened the Welsh Parliament at Machynlleth and planned to establish two universities.

That’s why the biased, heinous and rancorous playwright William Shakespeare, who felt inferior to the Welsh legend, portrayed Owain Glyndwr negatively as a wild and ominous person with magical powers.

To address the situation in revolted Wales, the paranoid rulers of England passed silly and discriminatory laws in 1402 prohibiting the Welsh from carrying arms, inhabiting fortified towns, and holding any office. As per this aberration, even an Englishman married to a Welsh woman was not allowed to carry arms!

A later stage of English tyranny over Wales was promulgated by the outrageous Laws in Wales Acts (1535 – 1542) when the Welsh language was banned and the Welsh legal system abolished. In an acrimoniously contemptuous manner, this trash paper describes the Welsh language and the will of the Welsh nation to stick to it in this manner: “because that the People of the same Dominion have and do daily use a speche nothing like, ne consonant to the natural Mother Tongue used within this Realm, some rude and ignorant People have made Distinction and Diversity between the King’s Subjects of this Realm, and his Subjects of the said Dominion and Principality of Wales, whereby great Discord Variance Debate Division Murmur and Sedition hath grown between his said Subjects”.

An ethnic nation, when exposed to tyranny and persecution, naturally sticks to its language and religion to best preserve its identity. Similarly, the Welsh enthusiastically welcomed the first complete translation of the Welsh Bible in 1588, and overwhelmingly rejected Anglicanism when the heretic and murderous king Henry VIII broke with Rome and the Pope. Education in Welsh language was made available under different forms and become a basic means of resistance to English occupation in the 16th and the 17th centuries. Religion became also a means of resistance against English tyranny during the 18th c. Welsh Methodist revival and after the definite separation from the Anglican Church in the early 19th c.; in general, Wales remained predominantly Non-conformist, which is tantamount to rejection of Anglicanism.

Welsh nationalism was best manifested in the late 19th c. through the Cymru Fydd movement’s activities that garnered great support among the Welsh for having reinstated Welsh values and ideas; to best propagate the Welsh determination for National Independence, Welsh nationalists evoked Llewelyn ap Gruffudd, making of him the father of Welsh nationalism, and the National Hero of Wales. Late 19th c. and 20th c. socialism in Wales may be due to Wales’ heavy industrialization, but it was also another form of Welsh resistance to English occupation and of Welsh rejection of the English monarchy. The latest offspring of Cymru Fydd is Plaid Cymru, a political party established in 1925 to advocate independent Wales, which has to be declared in the years to come as the national homeland of the entire Welsh nation (6.5 million people worldwide whereas 16.3 million people have acknowledged Welsh ancestry).

English tyranny and monstrosity in Ireland

For Eire (Ireland, Roman Hibernia), divisions, invasions and epidemics have always been constant parameters of life; following the 9th c. Viking invasions, a mixed Irish-Norse ethnic group was shaped. However, after the decline of the Viking presence, the Norman invasion overwhelmed the numerous small Irish kingdoms and progressively involved the king of England for the first time in Ireland in the second half of the 12th c.; however, the Norman control never extended over the entire Irish territory and several indigenous rulers controlled other parts of the island. A certain Irish-Norman community was formed in the first century of Norman prevalence, but the Gaelic identity of the islanders was soon reasserted and re-strengthened. Decimated because the mid 14th c. plague epidemics, Ireland remained peaceful and divided until the middle of the 16th c. when Henry VIII decided to annex the island in 1536. This triggered successive waves of cataclysmic disasters for the Gaelic nation of Ireland and, although it took almost 400 years of struggles for the Irish to regain control over their country, still a part of the island is occupied by England. The English king’s pretext for the annexation (1541) was the fact that Ireland could serve as basis for future rebellions against his throne or for foreign invasions of England.

An early form of reaction against the English rule was attested already in 1569 – 1573 (the Deasmumhain/Desmond Rebellions in the South-Western part of the island); this event was the normal reaction to the biased attitude demonstrated by Elizabeth I in the case of the antagonism and clash between her cousin Thomas Butler (3rd earl of Ormonde) and the leaders of the Irish Gerald and John Fitzgerald. London’s racist policies in Ireland involved land confiscation, abolition of Irish armies, and severe religious oppression of the Catholic faith. Led by James Fitzmaurice, the Irish marked several victories until English barbarism prevailed in 1575; thousands of civilians were killed in the process, and the corridors that gave access to the English military camps used to be decorated with severed heads on permanent basis. Hundreds of Irish military leaders were executed in the years after the end of the rebellion. At the same time, another rebellion took place in England’s north as Catholic English nobles intended to replace the infamous bogus-queen Elizabeth I with Mary of Scotland; because of the intolerable English barbarism demonstrated in both rebellions, Pope Pius V excommunicated the rubbish queen of the English. Few years later, in 1579, the Second Desmond rebellion exploded to express rightful Irish indignation for the English barbarism and due hostility against the English settlers. It ended in 1583 when, after relentless scorched-earth tactics, the English managed to prevail. A clan chief who betrayed the leader of the rebellion, Gerald Earl of Desmond, was rewarded with 1000 pounds of silver from the English government for his high treason. In a typically English and inhuman manner, the earl’s head was sent to the demoniacal queen of England whereas his body was displayed on the walls of Cork.

During the War between Spain and England (1585 – 1604), Ireland became very often the place of brutal conflicts and battles. After the Spanish Armada failed to coordinate with the Irish and efficiently use Ireland as a basis to invade England in 1588, further colonization efforts took place in Ireland. This led to the Nine Years’ War of Liberation of Ireland (1594 – 1603), a liberation struggle that was undertaken by many Irish nobles who rejected the plantation (: colonization) policies at Ulster and marked many victories over the English armies. The island was then again extensively destroyed and scores of population died because of the scorched earth tactics pursued by the English beasts. More than 100000 Irish were killed and more than 30000 English soldiers died as per modest estimates. With a better coordination with the Spaniards, Ireland would have avoided the calamitous destiny it underwent for more than 300 years after the end of this war.

Land confiscation and plantations continued during the 17th c., involving full dispossession of the Irish Catholic landowners and promulgations of vicious, inhuman, anti-Christian, and purely Satanic laws that were shamelessly called ‘Penal Laws’. In the Irish History’s bloodiest century, two periods of revolution (1641 – 1653 and 1689 – 1691) plunged the country in further disaster and caused an unprecedented hecatomb. For seven years (1642 – 1649), the Cónaidhm Chaitliceach na hÉireann (Irish Catholic Confederation) tried to materialize the wishes and the dreams of the Irish nation. Based at Kilkenny, the Irish nobles, clergy and military leaders set up a General Assembly (parliament) and a Supreme Council (government); however, they pledged allegiance to the king of England, because they were naïve enough to imagine that an agreement could ever be reached. The tensions between moderates and radicals, and both sides’ narrow-mindedness proved to be catastrophic for Ireland. As the English king was engulfed in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (England, Ireland and Scotland / 1639 – 1651), it was only normal for him to make concessions to the Irish Confederates in exchange for the dispatch of Irish troops to England to fight for the royalists. This was evidently a serious mistake made by the Irish government. The divisions led to the English re-conquest of Ireland by Cromwell (1649 – 1653), which was the most brutal moment of foreign occupation that Ireland had ever experienced, and to the termination of the Confederation. All Catholic properties on the island were by then confiscated and scores of Irish ‘undesirables’ were sent to the Caribbean as slaves.

For one more time in the 17th c., Ireland became the theater of many battles engaged and many fights undertaken, when the disreputable English parliament dethroned the Catholic king of England James II and replaced him with a foreign swindler and disreputable crook, William of Orange (1688). This was a deliberate case of shameful sedition, which the perverse English eulogized as ‘the glorious revolution’ – which shows the extent of their collective corruption, immorality and deviousness. It was only normal for the Irish Catholics to express their support for the deposed king James II. The war of two kings (Cogadh an Dá Rí), which is called in England the ‘Williamite war in Ireland’, lasted two years (1689 – 1691). Rejected in England, James II was accepted in Ireland and appeared in front of a newly composed Irish Parliament (known as the Patriot Parliament) to restore to the Irish Catholics their long confiscated lands. Although supported by France, James II failed to prevail and was defeated after many fierce battles.

A period of unprecedented tyranny started in the aftermath of the Battle of Aughrim (the last fought by the Irish supporters of James II in 1691); the English euphemistically call this period ‘Protestant Ascendancy’, but in reality it constitutes one of the bleakest moments of European History, as it makes Hitler’s Germany grow pale. The inhuman ‘penal laws’ were reinforced, and the English colons took good care that the Irish fail to repeat their rebellions. Deliberate famine caused the death of ca. half a million Irish in 1740-1741. The Irish Parliament was available only for the English settlers to be elected in, and evil projects were constantly under discussion as to how best destroy the island nation in an irrevocable manner. The worst development was of course the fact that the descendants of the alien colons started viewing Ireland as their native country, which shows that the evil policy of ‘plantations’ had generated a counterfeit entity in Ireland, i.e. a new ‘civic nation’.

Following the Irish Revolution of 1798 and the subsequent Acts of Union (1801), the Irish nation deployed ceaselessly further, well-diversified efforts to achieve national independence in the 19th c. The major historical developments revolve around the following events: the rebellion led by Robert Emmet in 1803, Daniel O’Connell’s campaign to achieve emancipation for his nation (1823) and his establishment of the Repeal Association (1830), the Tithe War (1831 – 1838), the Young Irelanders’ rebellion in 1848 (in the middle of the great famine which was again deliberately caused by the English government in order to reduce the Irish population), the revolution of the Irish Brotherhood in 1867, and the longest and most effective of all, the great Cogadh na Talún (Land War), which was an endless agrarian agitation that was led by the Irish National Land League and lasted from 1870 to 1900. The various Land Acts that the English government was forced to promulgate in the very last years of the 19th c. and in the beginning of the 20th c. heralded the end of the colonial rule. Home Rule was stipulated by an act passed by the English Parliament in 1914. The famous Éirí Amach na Cásca (Easter Rising) in 1916, the ensuing period of upheaval (1916 – 1921), and the threat of Irishmen soldiers fighting for the English army in the Western Front during WW I ushered Ireland into the next stage, i.e. the declaration of independence of the Irish Republic, the Irish War of Independence (1919 – 1921), the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921 – 1922), the formation of the Irish Free State, the separation of the northern part of the island (the unionist descendents of the colons), and the Irish Civil War (Cogadh Cathartha na hÉireann; 28 June 1922 – 24 May 1923), which was the last of so many venomous presents that the pernicious English made to the Irish nation.

English tyranny and monstrosity in Scotland

For the Scottish Kingdom of Alba, interaction and mixed marriages with some of the English kingdoms go back to the 11th c., when King Mael Coluim (Malcolm) III (1058 – 1093) spent many years at the court of the English king Edward the Confessor before fighting and killing Mac Bethad mac Findlaích (Macbeth) to become king of Scotland in his stead. Malcolm III and William of Normandy, the bastard king and invader of England, fought several wars before finally meeting in 1072 and making a peace that justified later claims of sovereignty over Scotland by other English kings.

In the early 12th c. the so-called Davidian Revolution, launched by David I of Scotland, marked a stage of adjusting the government and the society to French and English norms, styles and practices. During the 12th and the 13th centuries, increased affinities and greater interaction between the two nations led several Scottish nobles to see in Edward I of England a possible arbiter for the succession of Alexander III of Scotland when 14 contenders to the throne were about the trigger a civil war in 1286. As Edward I tried to undermine Scottish sovereignty, John of Scotland entered into an alliance with France (Auld Alliance) and this ushered both countries into what is called ‘The Wars of Scottish Independence’ (1296 – 1328 and 1332 – 1357).

Scotland was first occupied by England in 1296, but revolt broke already 1297. The ensuing wars were inconclusive, involving many battles, Scottish raids in England, and English campaigns in Scotland, truces, and executions of the Scottish nobles {Uilliam Uallas (William Wallace) in 1305}; it all revolved around the succession to the throne of Scotland and the alliance of some of the pretenders with the English. Three declarations of Scottish independence dating between 1320 and 1328 were sent to the Pope, and finally in 1328, Edward III of England recognized the independence of Scotland by signing the Treaty of Edinburgh – Northampton.

The Second War of Scottish Independence was due to the alliance some Scottish nobles made with Edward III few years later in order to overthrow David II of Scotland and replace him with other pretenders, notably the disreputable thug Balliol who after crowning himself king of Scots declared that Scotland was a fief of England. The French – Scottish alliance was strengthened by the fact that France and England were then engaged in the Hundred Years’ War (1337 – 1453). When David II of Scotland was granted asylum in France (1334) by Philip VI of France, Scottish resistance was led by many Scottish nobles. Victories were marked by both sides until David II returned in 1341. However, in the Battle of Neville’s Cross, David II was captured (1346) and subsequently held prisoner in the Tower of London for eleven years. Released under the terms of the Treaty of Berwick (1357), David II agreed to pay an enormous amount for ransom, and this progressively alienated the Scottish nation from him; at the same time, the country was also devastated by the Black Death pandemics. After David II died (1371), an impoverished, exsanguine Scotland was still an independent nation, and so it remained until 1707 under the Stuart dynasty, a family of Breton origin that had earlier held the office of High Steward of Scotland and, in 1371, rose to the throne of Scotland (Robert II).

During Stuart reign, there were again many interactions and mixed marriages with the English, internal strife between the Scottish kings and the nobles, alliance with France and wars with England (notably the Battle of Flodden in 1513, the Battle of Solway Moss in 1542, and the Battle of Pinkie Cleugh in 1547). However, when James IV of Scotland married Margaret Tudor, daughter to Henry VII of England, in 1503, the perspective of a union between the two crowns appeared for the first time.

The Scottish Reformation movement influenced greatly the historical developments, and following the signature of the Treaty of Edinburgh (1560), the French and the English soldiers left Scotland’s territory and the Scottish Parliament abolished Roman Catholic Christianity. The Scots Confession of 1560 became the formational document of the Reformed Calvinist Christianity to which most of the Scots adhered; it was however enacted in 1567. The Battle of Langside (1568) and the persecution and execution of Queen Mary of Scotland demonstrated the rise of religious fanaticism in Scotland and the ensuing civil war (Scottish aristocrats supporting James VI against Scotland’s nobles who sided with his mother, Queen Mary of Scotland) lasted many years (1569 – 1573).

When James VI of Scotland inherited the throne of England and became James I on England (1603), the two countries were found united under one monarch; however, this was a personal union that did not have the support of the Scottish nation. Quite contrarily, Scots firmly rejected every effort deployed by either James VI of his son, Charles I, to diffuse forms and rites related to Anglicanism, a most reviled and villainous doctrine in Scotland. Re-affirmation of the Scottish identity and cultural integrity was particularly noted in the famous St. Giles riots (1637) when a treacherous effort was made to introduce English-style prayer book into the Scottish Church.

In fact, the troubles had started earlier, when Charles I proceeded to St. Giles in 1633 for his Scottish coronation, using Anglican rites on Scottish territory. As the rejection was overwhelming, Scots were very watchful and when, on 23 July 1637, it became understood that another style was introduced in the Mass, a revolt took place. It started when a brave woman, the legendary Jenny Geddes, a merchant, noticed first the alien style, stood up, and hurled her folding stool toward the Dean of Edinburgh, because he had just started to read the unacceptable, alien text. As her ‘cuttie-stool’ was flying towards the Dean’s head, Jenny Geddes yelled:

  • Devil cause you colic in your stomach, false thief! Dare you say the Mass in my ear?

The religious service was interrupted by the ensuing riot, and although the rioters were removed by the soldiers, the news spread immediately across the city, and a revolt took place in Edinburgh, as the city magistrates were assailed in the City Chambers. The thunderous voice of the Scottish nation was heard, and the authorities were forced to negotiate; a Committee was appointed for the negotiations with the king’s council. As Charles I rejected to withdraw from Scotland the Anglican liturgy, the Scots revolted and the old National Covenant of 1581 was convened again in February 1638. Reformed religion was maintained in the form in which it was spelled out in 1580 and all innovations were rejected; however Scots expressed their loyalty to the king.

The members of the Covenant (also known as Covenanters) confronted the established church. In November 1638, the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland deposed all bishops and banned the prayer book; this ushered Scotland into the Bishops’ Wars (Bellum Episcopale / 1639 – 1640) involving many battles between the Covenanters, the Scottish royalists, and the English army. Weakened in England, Charles I had to compromise and even went to Scotland in 1641 and accepted the decisions of the Scottish Parliament as he had already done with the decrees of the General Assembly of 1638. As per the terms of this compromise, the Scottish Parliament had the right to challenge the actions of his ministers.

During the ensuing Wars of the Three Kingdoms (parts of which are the Scottish Civil War, the Irish Confederate Wars, and the English Civil War / 1639 – 1651), Scotland was effectively ruled by the Covenanters. Scottish army was sent to Ireland against the Irish Rebellion of 1641 with the limited scope of protecting the Scottish settlers. In 1643, the Solemn League and Covenant was promulgated and, as per its terms, the preservation of the religious reform in Scotland was reconfirmed, whereas reformation of religion was demanded for England and Ireland. The Covenanters sent several armies to England to fight for the victory of the Parliament over the king, and the Scottish troops played an important role in inflicting a serious defeat to Charles I. However, this triggered the Civil War in Scotland (1644 – 1647), as the Scottish royalists rejected the Covenanters’ extremism and revolted. Following several battles and an early royalist success, the war ended with Charles I surrendering and being held captive. In a secret Engagement, the imprisoned king promised to help Scots implement Presbyterianism in England; an army was set up for this, but it was destroyed by Cromwell in 1648, and Charles I was subsequently executed (decapitated) in 1649.

Charles II was proclaimed as king by the Parliament of Scotland 6 days after the decapitation of his father, but this was rejected by the English Parliament. After defeating the Scottish royalist army loyal to the son of Charles I in the Battle of Dunbar (September 1650), Oliver Cromwell invaded Scotland; he sent the captives back to England where many of them died of starvation and exhaustion, whereas their survivors were sent further on to the Caribbean as slaves. To survive, Charles II had to fight the Battle of Worcester (1651), and after being defeated by Cromwell, he had to escape to Europe where he spent nine years in exile.

Scotland was under severe persecution when incorporated into the Puritan England; there was no independent church, no parliament, no government, and no legal system. The annexation was promulgated by the Tender Union (1652), which abolished the Scottish Parliament, offering Scotland 30 seats in the English Parliament. However, the Act of Union was approved only in 1657 due to the political turmoil.

Following the restoration (1660), Scotland became again an independent kingdom under Charles II, but the re-imposition of episcopacy and a series of other measures were greatly resented by the Scots (they were prevented from any lucrative business in English colonies as per the English Navigation Acts). Independent assemblies, known as conventicles, gathered the support of the majority and led to the revolt of 1679 which was defeated. Scotland was terribly persecuted until 1685 when James VII of Scotland (and James II of England) succeeded his brother; this period has been described as ‘The Killing Time’ and thousands were executed in excruciating manner.

The pro-Catholic measures and policies introduced by James VII led to the sedition of seven English high traitors who invited William of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, to rule England (a bleak moment of European History that the perfidious English shamelessly called ‘glorious revolution’). James VII had to flee, but after the imposition of the Dutch swindler and disreputable crook, supporters of James VII entered into several battles, fighting to overthrow the alien rule of the sexually perverse William of Orange (who ruled as William II of Scotland).

Economic disasters befell Scotland at the very end of the 17th c. due to various combined reasons and this forced the Scottish Parliament to take several measures like setting up the Bank of Scotland and financing a great colonial project (known as Darien scheme); the latter turned into a disaster particularly because the perfidious English of the ‘West Indies’ did not come to help the Scots colons when they were attacked by the Spaniards (1698).

The union with England (1707 at the times of the reign of Queen Anne, the daughter of James VII) was a desperate act taken without serious thought and after many years of economic adversity. By 110 to 69, the Scottish Parliament adopted the Treaty of Union in January 1707, making of Scotland a mere province of England and replacing all Scottish systems of laws, taxation and currency with the respective English practices. The union was a panacea for Scotland’s aristocracy and landowners, but it was widely reviled and loathed by the outright majority of the Scottish nation.

The three centuries of annexation failed to erase the Scottish national identity, cultural integrity, linguistic diversity, and behavioral difference. Scotland remained another nation, an ‘ethnic nation’ incorporated into the realm of the UK’s ‘civic nation’. The Scots tried many times to reject the English rule that so thoughtlessly a meager majority supported before 307 years.

The unpopularity of Scotland’s annexation to England generated many rebellions and already in 1708, James Francis Edward Stuart, son of James VII, attempted to land to Scotland with 6000 French soldiers and join forces with his supporters who became known as Jacobites. In 1715, the indignation against the rise of George I as successor to Anne of England led to generalized revolt in Wales, Scotland, and parts of England. The Jacobites lost several battles before James landed in Scotland, and he had therefore to flee back to France. In 1719, the Jacobites counted on Spanish assistance, but were finally defeated on the Battle of Glen Shiel. In 1745, James’ son, Charles Edward Stuart, landed in the Hebrides and, after gathering support, he sailed to Scotland and invaded Edinburgh. He did not only prevail over the English forces in the Battle of Prestonpans, but advanced into England, besieging and taking several cities as far as Derby. However, there he failed to get support for a Stuart Catholic restoration in the country, and he retreated to Scotland as an English army was approaching. Petty politics prevailed over the national Scottish case, and the liberals managed to regain control of Edinburgh. Following several battles and defeats, and after hiding for several months, Charles had to sail back to France in 1746. Genocidal practices were attested then, as the English army deliberately killed dozens of thousands of Scots, while sending scores to the English colonies as slaves. Gradually, Jacobitism waned and failed to gather support from the main Catholic courts of Europe. With the death of the last pretenders, this movement reached an end.

Terrible oppression matched with extensive corruption was the English method employed in order to preserve Scotland within the loathsome and tyrannical English state. By offering career opportunities and business chances to middle and upper-middle class Scots, the English government tried to make them expatriate to England and in the process lose their identity, language, and culture. In other words, they tried to turn Scotland’s ‘ethnic nation’ into a ‘civic nation’.

Lawless, evil legislation was then produced en masse in England for the purpose of Scotland’s disfigurement, identity destruction, language loss, and cultural disintegration. The Dress Act, the Act of Proscription, the Clan Act, the Disarming Act, and the Heritable Jurisdictions Act, all promulgated in 1746, prohibited Scottish language, forbidding every single aspect of Scottish culture, and crushing the Scottish clan system. In the process, it was prohibited for Scots to bear arms and wear tartans, whereas forced displacement deracinated hundreds of thousands of Scots from the Highlands where the rejection of the catastrophic union was overwhelming. It was an accomplished ethnic cleansing of the Scottish Highlands with full scale transportation of Scottish clans to other locations.

Scottish Law was abolished and jurisdiction by Scottish clan chief prohibited; English Law was imposed instead. ‘Justifying’ the destruction of an ‘ethnic nation’ and the Nazi-like imposition of a ‘civic nation’, Lord Hardwicke rejected the concept of multiple jurisdictions, stating that ‘private jurisdictions’ (as he described the Scottish traditional Law) would endanger liberty by encroaching on the legal authority of a constitutional monarchy. This is enough to make clear how fake a ‘civic nation’ is and how tyrannical it can be.

Pseudo-Christian school prayers for the king of England and his disreputable family were enforced throughout Scotland, whereas many other methods were devised to prevent children from being attached to their Scottish national identity, social organization, linguistic continuity, and cultural integrity (which were called in a typical Nazi-like manner ‘rebellious principles’).

The Highland Clearances are a shameful English euphemism for what is known among Scots as Fuadach nan Gàidheal, i.e. “the expulsion of the Gael”. They consisted in a century-long practice of forced displacement of Scotland’s most authentic, conscious, and traditional part of population. Under the pretext of setting up enclosures for sheep in order to revolutionize agriculture, the Nazi-like government of England expelled the indigenous inhabitants who represented a millennia long historical continuity in their homeland, i.e. Northern Scotland (the Highlands).

The main target was neither the land confiscation – expropriation to the benefit of some noble landowners nor the eviction of the inhabitants who relied on small scale agriculture, but the systematic destruction of the Scottish Gaelic culture. The forced emigration was of unprecedented scale, involving forced resettlement in the Scottish lowlands and the sea coast, and further on to North America or other English colonies in Asia and Australia. The series of events described as ‘clearances’ lasted from the mid 18th c. until the 2nd half of the 19th c. and the result was the total destruction of Scotland’s cultural topography; today, more descendents of the Highlanders live in America, Asia and Australia than in Scotland.

Some of the worst moments of the century-long ethnic cleansing occurred in the so-called Year of the Sheep (Bliadhna nan Caorach – 1792), when tenant farmers arranged a spectacular protest, removing more than 6000 sheep from the land around Ardross. Another particularly atrocious period was the decade 1811 – 1820, when it was common to evict 2000 families in one single day, fully expropriating them from their ancestors’ land. The disreputable and incestuous English aristocracy was the major accomplice in the process as they became the landowners of the confiscated lands; their racist, inhuman and Satanic mentality was epitomized by a sentence written by the filthy duchess of Sutherland in her correspondence with an Englishman: “Scotch people are of happier constitution and do not fatten like the larger breed of animals”. (http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/columnists/the-duchess-the-highland-clearances-the-housekeeper-and-a-story-to-make-you-weep.24229043)

Living in England at the time, Karl Marx described the Highland Clearances as spoliation, fraud, robbery and usurpation carried out under ‘reckless terrorism’. In the middle of the 19th c., an entire school of racist philosophers, theoreticians and ideologists rose to pro-eminence in England, trying to ‘prove’ in a ‘scientific’ manner that the Scottish Celtic race was inferior to the Anglo-Saxon; it gathered overwhelming support among the bastard ‘civic nation’ of England.

For Alex Salmond, Scotland’s First Minister, unveiling a 3 m high bronze named ‘Exiles’ in Helmsdale, Sutherland (July 2007) was a minimal contribution to the Immortalizing of the thousands of dead, emigrated and persecuted Scots.

Scottish literature became for centuries a means of anti-English resistance, and among many great poets of the Ossian circle, Robert Burns (1759 – 1796), Scotland’s national poet, proved to be the herald of the Gaelic Revival in the late 19th c., of the Scottish Renaissance in the 20th c., and of the Scottish Gaelic Renaissance in our times. The Scottish Covenant, proposed in 1930, promoted in 1939, and signed by two million people in 1951, exemplified these demands, whereas the Scottish Unionist Party declined and was duly dissolved finally in 1965. As devolution referenda strengthened Scots’ political consciousness, the Scottish National Party gathered momentum.

A higher stage was attained when Mike Russell, Member of the Scottish Parliament (SNP), spoke in Scottish Gaelic in a European Union meeting in May 2010. It became evident that full independence, and not mere home rule, is the demand of Scotland’s new generation. Alex Salmond’s defeat in the Independence Referendum (18/9/2014) reflects basically a wrong choice; instead of viewing Scots as a ‘civic nation’, SNP must rediscover and reassert Scotland’s ethnic nation in all its characteristics, dimensions and capacities.

Liberal – Secular Opposition in Egypt, their Targets, and the Freemasonic Threats for Egypt’s Future

(Public lecture given at the Gamaaeyah Ansar wa Sunnah, Aswan – Egypt, on December 14, 2012)

The confusing situation that prevails in today’s Egypt and the intensive activism of the liberal – secular opposition do not herald anything good for the country. The great majority of the Egyptians, irrespective of their faith, ideas, and political position, are deeply worried about the future of the country. But this does not bother the liberal – secular opposition at all; quite contrarily, their leaders consider it possible to benefit from it.

How trustworthy a group of political parties can be, when they disregard the worries of the outright majority of the Egyptian people? How virtuous can they be?

Disregard of the people’s worries and wishes is the typical characteristic of a dictatorship; customarily, former president Mubarak disregarded the worries and the wishes of the Egyptian people in a very great number of political and social issues.

Opposing former president Mubarak, the liberal – secular organizations that later formed the backbone of today’s opposition tried to give the impression that they are democratic, which supposedly means that they respect the expressed will of the people, the recorded votes of the people, and the articulated wishes of the majority of the people.

The impression they gave about them being democratic is absolutely false. Not only because they are not democratic. Certainly, they are very totalitarian, and the will and the wishes of the Egyptian people are not a matter of concern for them.

The reason for which Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition is not democratic is double and deeply historical.

I. Democracy: a fake, euphemistic name for a tyrannical regime

First, in real, historical terms, democracy is not a properly speaking democratic system, but a form of tyranny. The term was first established in Ancient Greece where there was no large or big state, but rather small cities-states, like in Phoenicia. In the first half of the 1st millennium BCE, each Ancient Greek state was a small kingdom, but progressively in the 6th century BCE many kingdoms were overthrown and many cities-states became either tyrannies or democracies.

At the time, tyrant meant a strong leader who controlled militarily the small state with the help of an armed group. And democracy meant a city-state that was ruled by the will not of one person, but by the will of the people (demos). Literarily speaking, ‘democracy’ means ‘the state of the people’. But how democratic was a democracy like that of Athens in the 5th century BCE?

In Athens, the majority of the population consisted of the slaves; they originated from Phrygia, Thrace, Illyria, Macedonia, Scythia, etc. As per different estimates of specialists, the slaves in Athens constituted anything between 60 and 70% of the total population. The same phenomenon occurred in the supposedly ‘democratic’ Roman Republic few centuries later. As a matter of fact, the slaves not only did not have the right to vote but were not even considered as ‘humans’. In Latin, they were called ‘res’ that is ‘things’.

Furthermore, the female population in Athens, in other so-called democratic cities-states, and in Rome, had no civil rights, and consequently women could not participate in the decision-making process of each country. Therefore, if we assume that in 5th century BCE Athens the local population constituted ca. 35% of the entire population, we realize that, practically speaking, the political affairs were controlled by half of that population, e.g. the males, which reduces the decision-makers to a mere 17-18%. But of course only adult men were accepted, and this concludes the case of the undemocratic system of rule that prevailed in Ancient Athens: the political control was in fact at the hands of no more than 10-12% of the population, i.e. the adult males of local origin. At this point, one should take into consideration the fact that foreign residents were also excluded, because ‘local origin’ in a city-state in Ancient Greece usually meant proven residence of a family in the city-state for no less than six (6) generations, which translates to ca. 150 years!

If we now refer to each political decision taken and imposed, we certainly go to an even lower figure, because in the debates that took place, there were always different / opposite opinions and suggestions expressed, and – as in the modern fake democracies – the decision reflected the political will of the majority among this small group of 10-12% of the entire local population. In other words, ca. 6-7% of the entire population decided and ‘legitimately’ imposed their decision on the rest. In many cases, the decision meant taxes, war, death or other seminal issues.

II. Ancient Greek democracy: it was not ‘democracy’, and it was not Greek.

One should also examine whether some among the Ancient Greeks really invented this political system, and if not, how it was diffused among them. There are ancient Greek texts that illuminate this point; according to substantive textual evidence, there were many Phoenicians who settled colonies in the Aegean Sea and in different parts of continental Greece, as they did in many other coastlands of the Mediterranean Sea, nad in the Atlantic coasts of Iberia and NW Africa.
In fact, it is from the sociopolitical and administrative system of the Phoenician colonies that many social groups and political parties in different Ancient Greek cities-states got this new political concept. Contrarily to the Phoenician cities-states (Tyr, Byblus, Sidon, Beirut, Arvad, etc.) that were all kingdoms, the Phoenician colonies were real democracies; most important and most famous among them was Carthage, which was founded in the year 800 BCE in the area of modern Tunis.

Carthage, like every other Phoenician and Carthaginian colony, was a democracy, because there was a general assembly of the Phoenician colons established there, and they elected the Senate, the government and the ruler. In the light of aforementioned, it is important to note that, prior to the year 600 BCE, there was not a single Ancient Greek state to be governed by a ‘democratic’ system.

III. Ancient & modern ‘democracy’: Fake political systems based on historical forgery

But why no one attributes today the origin of Democracy to the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians, and as per the prevailing opinion the system was invented by some Ancient Greeks?

This question finds its answer in another question:

Why everyone in the West considers the Ancient Greek adaptation of the Phoenician colonies’ political system as a truly ‘democratic’ system and as a real ‘state of the people’ (as the Ancient Greek word clearly denotes), whereas in the place where this term was first created, the so-called ‘democratic’ system was deeply and clearly undemocratic and anti-democratic?

The answer to both questions is one:

Those who by controlling the leading Western countries exercise an undeniable control over large parts of today’s world,
a) have prepared and diffused their own false History (and amongst others wiped out the Phoenicians and the Carthaginians),
b) have had the need to propagate an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens, and – even worse –
c) have ruled the modern Western world (and a very large part of the world through their colonies), using a similar, unrepresentative and undemocratic system: the modern pseudo-democracy.

IV. Fake western democracy and Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition

Now, where does all this take us with regard to Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

The historical reason for which Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is undemocratic and dictatorial we already explained; they ascribe themselves to an old system of ruling that is very discriminatory and absolutely totalitarian. Even the word coined to describe this system in Ancient Greece – a word that reflects not a reality but merely an Ancient Greek viewpoint of it – was quite contradictory to the historical reality and practice of that system.

But there is also political evidence testifying to the fact that Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is in reality undemocratic and dictatorial. This is the point to discuss here. The identity and the nature of the political promoters of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition do not bode well for Egypt’s future.

Who are the real fabricators, supporters, promoters and employers of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Screening the international and the Egyptian mass media, we can safely identify them; every time there is a clash between the Islamist government and the liberal – secular opposition, they lash out at the government whereas in parallel they side with the opposition, thus shockingly interfering in the political life of the country. Who are they? They are those, who ….

have managed to control today’s westernized – ‘global’ world to large extent,

have prepared and diffused their systematic, false History,

have had the need to propagate and evidently propagated an undemocratic system like that of Ancient Athens in order to rule the world through this bias

have ruled most of today’s world through this bias, and in the process they disseminated antihuman, evil ideas and practices, overwhelming corruption, and ultimately imposed an evil lifestyle and way of life, deprived of virtues and values, at the very antipodes of all the earlier social models and the associated cultures and civilizations throughout History.

Who are the fabricators of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

Here we have to deal with several layers of political corruption, financial dependence, and evil backstage practices.

Those who fabricated today’s various opposition groups that did not exist before 3 years, with the exception of the Wafd party, the socialists and the communists, are:

International NGOs,

International organizations,

Western governments,

Financial groups of power, banks and funds,

Research institutes and political lobbies,

And, behind them all, a secret company that controls everything behind the political stage.

What is this company and what are their plans?

With its roots retraced back to the Antiquity and with its origins going back to the 3rd millennium BCE, this secret company is ‘recently’ known under the name of Freemasonry, and they have been known under this name for almost 300 years (1717). Although marginal during the Christian and Islamic Ages, they rose to power first in Western Europe through the biases of Renaissance, Classicism, Enlightenment Philosophy, American Revolution, French Revolution, Industrial Revolution, and Marxism – Leninism.

What are the main points that bear witness to a link between the secret company of the Freemasons and Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition?

First of all, there are several members of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition that are freemasons; they blindly and wholeheartedly execute the orders they receive. Mohamed el Baradei is one of them. You can be sure that in today’s world no one becomes Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency without being a Freemason, and more importantly, without being a very much trusted member of the villainous, Satanic organization. Positions like that are viewed by the Freemasons as outstanding posts and key instruments in their effort to take over the entire world, so only perfectly utilizable and utilized members are promoted to and maintained in such positions.

What few people know is that for them, their country and their religion are of no value, as the oath of allegiance they made when becoming freemasons supersedes every other and every previous.

Second, there is vast similarity of political language. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition promises now to deliver in Egypt corresponds to what other Freemasonry-controlled parties, mass media, associations, organizations, statesmen, politicians, journalists and intellectuals demanded or propagated in so many countries all over the world. The terms, the concepts, the ideals, the ‘values’, the words and the jargon evoked are exactly the same.

Third, there is vast similarity of targets and criticisms. Whom do they criticize? Always anyone who is not a Freemason or a Freemasonry-controlled party, association, organization, statesman, politician, journalist and intellectual!

With exactly the same resolution, they rejected two persons that belonged effectively to two different worlds, namely former President Hosni Mubarak and current President Muhammad Morsi, only because both are not freemasons! They certainly find excuses for this biased ludicrous attitude of theirs, and they publicly pretend that they reject totalitarian rulers, but their shameless stance is easily unveiled when one notices that finally, for the Freemasons and their puppets, the only non-totalitarian rulers are their Freemasonic ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’! This seclusion-promoting, highly discriminatory mindset is diametrically opposed to the normal, unbiased, average mindset of the human beings as this was attested across millennia. Of course, Mubarak and Morsi are not the only targets of Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition! They also speak negatively about Venezuela’s Chavez, Bolivia’s Morales, Russia’s Putin, Belarus’ Lukashenko, etc., etc., etc. only because all these statesmen and rulers are not freemasons!

Fourth, there is vast similarity of political allies, models and points of reference. Whom do they refer to? Who is the perfect political example for them? Who are the perfect embodiments of all the ideas they evoke? Always Western European, North American states, parties, associations, mass media that are known to be under Freemasonic control or politicians and statesmen, journalists and intellectuals who are known to be Freemasons.

Fifth, there is vast similarity of methods. What Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition attempts to do now, other Freemasonry-controlled schemes tried to perpetrate in other countries in various moments over the past decades. Simply, not many people noticed (let alone studied) the correct parallels! One can effectively draw parallels and compare Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition with king Juan Carlos of Spain and his associates during the last decade of Franco’s regime, and after the Generalissimo’s death. For many years, Prince Juan Carlos promised fidelity to Franco’s ideals and respect to the Catholic Church’s concepts and social standards. However, treacherously enough, after Franco died, Freemason Juan Carlos promoted Freemasonic policies and practices up to the point of signing laws legitimizing adultery, abortion and, more recently, homosexual marriages and adoption of children by homosexual couples. In a 40 years space of time, all the traditional ethics, the cultural integrity, and the religious identity of Spain collapsed. This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will prove to be good for, if it is allowed to exist.

V. Freemasonry-impacted politics & parallels between Spain in the 1970s & Egypt in the 2010s

In the early 70s, Spain was still a European country apart from the then European Communities, well-attached to the local traditions and religion, and the Spanish society had managed to be
– only slightly influenced by the so-called modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– hardly characterized by notions of atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism, and
– even less affected by all aspects of modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism, and Western morals.

How did this happen? The answer is simple; Generalissimo Franco kept the Freemasons out of Spain, and his secret services developed a sophisticated network to monitor the country and successfully identify any attempt of Freemasonic infiltration.

Today’s Egypt is still a Mediterranean – Middle Eastern – East African country apart from the present world order, and the great majority of the Egyptian people are well-attached to the their traditions and religion.

Until the beginning of 2011, few Egyptians would easily ascribe to
– modern currents of philosophy and political ideology,
– atheism, agnosticism, and social amoralism,
– deviate behavior, lifestyle and sexual mores that are now promoted and made legitimate in the West, and
– extensive and overwhelming consumerism as attested in the West.

And although the whole world has been increasingly ‘modernized’ over the past 40 years with catastrophic impact on the socio-behavioral system of vast populations worldwide, involving the collapse of traditional values and the disintegration of the family-based social model, Egypt was hardly affected. As a matter of fact, in Egypt, the new, deviate morals of the West have been hardly accepted, whereas modernism, modern technology life style, mass tourism were repeatedly and extensively conditioned upon Islamic criteria.

Why did this happen? Following the collapse of the kingdom (1952), most of the Freemasons left Egypt because their financial – political interests were gravely damaged with the then launched reforms. Most of pre-1952 Egypt’s Freemasons were foreigners, so they knew that, despites their losses in Egypt, they could make it elsewhere. However, Egyptian Freemasons left too, first because their financial – political interests were also heavily hit and their social position greatly undermined, and second because, as Freemasons, they were more attached to their so-called ‘brethren’ in Satan than to their country of origin. They expected they would ensure critical assistance in another country, and they actually ensured it and prospered.

Under the successive tenures of Muhammad Naguib, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el Sadat, and Hosni Mubarak, Freemasons attempted a mild, soft and covered comeback, but they found an unfriendly environment and their activities were minimal if not none. At those days, Freemasons around the world were comfortable seeing Jehan el Sadat and Suzanne Mubarak promoting Western ideas across the Egyptian society and offering the model of a Westernized Egyptian first lady to the world mass media.

But the Egyptian society reacted quite well, and preserved their values and traditions, rejecting the widely spread sexualization and pornification of the daily life and refusing the systematic attacks against the traditional ethics, virtues and culture. What occurred in the Western societies over the last six (6) decades did not actually happen in Egypt..

And the notorious Freemasonic lodge of Heliopolis that is rather called Baron Empain Palace (in Arabic ‘qasr al baron’; in French ‘le palais hindou’ – named after Édouard Louis Joseph, Baron Empain, 1852 – 1929) remained closed.

How was possible for Spain to deviate within just 40 years up to the point of being a fully anti-Christian state that does not penalize adultery, allows hundreds of thousands of embryos to be killed annually, and approves of non-Christian marriages that are only euphemistically called ‘civil marriages’?

How Spain reached the bottom of the world’s corruption and immorality by making legitimate the homosexual marriages and the adoption of children by homosexual couples?

The answer is simple: through massive, sophisticated, multifaceted, multilayered, successive, and coordinated Freemasonic lies, misinformation, deception, and duplicity diffused in public in a carefully conceived, methodically programmed, and systematically executed manner. We can analyze few key points of the evil behavior and policies testified by king Juan Carlos, Felipe Gonzalez, and Jose Zapatero, Spain’s key evil figures – all Freemasons.

They never announced their real targets from the beginning; only after one first step was made – as deterioration of the status of Catholic Spanish identity and culture (ex. legalization of the abortion) – another was announced (ex. legalization of homosexual marriages). This already demonstrates the evil intentions of the Freemasons, and sheds light on the deep reasons that impose oath-bound secrecy to Freemasons. The hidden masters of Freemasonry know that their real targets are humanly unacceptable; that’s why they first hire new members promising them socio-professional success, second bind their members by oath, third deliver portions of the reality to them, and fourth oblige them to work for the materialization of the overall, evil plan that, had most of the Freemasons known at the very beginning, they would have never accepted to become members.

In Spain, the leading Freemasons-in charge pursued an evil policy, by using either general popular support or support acquired on one occasion in order to promote an unannounced yet secretly programmed target, and by fooling the people on diverse subjects in order to extract acceptance on a specific point that is part of the Freemasonic scheme. The latter technique is tantamount to subversion of the common sense.

When a key term and element of the local common culture and worldview within a certain society loses its significance, the entire system within which it was located is automatically degraded, and this brings collapse upon collapse for all the key terms of the cultural-behavioral system. This situation triggers an advanced decay, and the immediate consequence is the weakening of the remaining key terms of common culture and worldview of the society in question. This is the way to social decomposition and to ultimate destruction of the Mankind.

To this deterioration there is no end, except the total disintegration of the human society and its transformation to a bestial realm whereby humans are totally disconnected from the spiritual world, cut off from the nature, and left without religion, without family, without traditions, and without culture. Therein, as it is already attested in the jungle, every notion of sin is forgotten, and the earth will look pretty much like the hell as we know it through the diverse religious traditions and textual evidence.

This social disintegration is to be expected for every tyrannical, Freemasonry-controlled society, and this is exactly what has already happened to misfortunate Spain, as it had previously occurred to Italy, France, Germany, Holland, England, various other Western European countries, the US, Japan, and the countries of the British Commonwealth.

This is exactly what Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition is now greatly supported by the Freemasonic tyrannies of the West to carry out in Egypt.

VI. What will happen to Egypt if the liberal – secular opposition gains momentum?

As underlying philosophical currents and ideological systems, the following systems will be forcefully diffused, while opponents will be ridiculed through the criminal mass media possessed and controlled by the totalitarian, bogus- democratic, liberal – secular opposition:
– theories that support the Western pseudo-democracies (liberalism, neo-conservatism, social democracy) by creating false dilemmas,
– atheism, agnosticism, Darwinism, and social amoralism, and – last but not least – a deeply anti-Islamic approach to World History as per which religions stand accused for all the maledictions that have befallen on the Mankind, and
– a wild overdose of modernism, modern technology life style, consumerism, generalized sexualization and pornification of the daily life, matched with mass tourism, free of any need of compliance with Islamic criteria (tourism will be further utilized to corrupt the Egyptian mores and moral standards)

What is to be expected from Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition’s political platform at the sociopolitical level is the following:
– Egyptian single females will be able to rent flats and apartments of their own, and receive their friends there without the neighbors having the right to react.
– Courses of religion in the Primary and Secondary Education will be abolished (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– There will be an increased westernization wave in the Egyptian Primary, Preparatory and Secondary Education.
– Religion will stop being mentioned on the Egyptian identity cards, and passports.
– Abortion will be legalized pretty soon.
– An increased number of newspapers will start publishing pictures of women in bathing suits even on the first page.
– Adultery will not be penalized anymore.
– Alcohol will be allowed to be sold in all the restaurants, cafés, and supermarkets across the country.
– Homosexuality will not be considered reprehensible anymore.
– Pornography will increase dramatically in very short time.
– The first sex shops will appear in Down Town Cairo, in Alexandria, Port Said, Luxor and Aswan, as well as across the tourist resorts in the Red Sea coast and in the Sinai.
– Tolerance will be shown for provocative public appearance of the homosexuals, the prostitutes, and the transsexuals in order to adjust the country mores – not to the Egyptian people wishes and mentality (as it is now) but – to the demands of international NGOs; this means that the still existing notion of public decency will collapse and disappear.
– There will be more female than male judges – in full violation of the expectation, the wishes, and the political ideas of the outright majority of the Egyptian people.
– It will be allowed for homosexuals to declare in public their nature, without anyone being able to discriminate them – in their professional and social life.
– Religion will be separated from the state (under the pretext of peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Christians in Egypt).
– Progressively, Friday will become a fully working day, and Sunday will replace it as the weekend’s 2nd day.
– Arabic will be written in Latin characters and numbers by an increasing number of people (this is nowadays called ‘Franco-Arab’), and some groups will issue the first websites, books and newspapers in this fake writing system.
– At a later stage, and when possible reactions of the majority will be discouraged, homosexual marriages will become legal.
– Adoption of children by homosexual couples will also become legal.

I expanded mainly on socio-behavioural, cultural and moral issues, but there will be a grave deformation of the Egyptian economy and politics as well. Meanwhile, Freemasons will expand their activities, open many lodges, and try to further penetrate in the Egyptian society in order to faster corrupt it and adjust it to their regional interests and global targets.

An important parameter of economic character that has to be anticipated is the forceful abandonment of the Egyptian agriculture, which will trigger an increased exodus from the Egyptian farmlands and provinces toward the urban centers and the (already) big cities.

If the tele-guided and remote-controlled leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition manage to put obstacles to the constitutional referendum (note: the speech was given before the 15 & 22/12/2012 referendum where the voter turnout reached only 32.86%), stop the political process (note: here they proved to be successful by cancelling the announced parliamentary elections of 22 April – and runoffs up to 24 June 2013), overthrow the newly elected president and government, and finally climb to power, one has to expect that the percentage of the population working in agriculture will drop dramatically under 5% – under the vicious and false pretext of the ‘modernization’ of Egypt’s economy. The ensuing result will be a heavy dependence of Egypt on agricultural imports which will push the whole country to further debts and total disaster.

The recent examples of many heavily indebted European countries (Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Cyprus, etc.) show clearly how cruelly and disastrously an indebted country is dealt with by the world’s leading financial institutions, e.g. the credit-rating agencies, the financial services companies, the asset management companies, the big banks, , and the hidden force behind those gangsters: the Freemasons. Now, in the case of a heavily indebted Egypt, there will be more levers of Freemasonic pressure, notably the colonial powers, e.g. France, England, America, and their disrespectful dependencies, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Belgium, Holland, etc.

Egyptians from all the walks of life should take note, as soon as they can, of the fact that Greece’s and Cyprus’ foreign policies have been tremendously flexed after their grave economic problems exploded. Both EU-member states had – during many long decades – balanced relations with the Arab League-member states and Israel. More particularly, Greece had closer and warmer relations with the Arab League-member states, either during the tenures of C. Caramanlis as prime minister (1955 – 1963 and 1974 – 1980) or under the colonel junta (1967 – 1973) or at the times of A. Papandreou’s premiership (1981 – 1989).

Now, Cyprus has been sold out to Israel, and the two signed many agreements of economic, political and military cooperation; in an effort to jointly explore the gas resources of the Mediterranean Sea continental shelf, they seem to have even signed an anti-Turkish pact that remains secret. In its gloomy perspectives of survival, Israel tries desperately to engulf other countries, weak governments, and silly politicians, without caring about the catastrophic impact such an engulfment will have on those countries.

Greece is a bankrupt country that was not allowed to announce its bankruptcy officially; this happened because the vicious, corrupt, and demented European statesmen did not want this ‘event’ to trigger sudden, catastrophic developments in the European Union that would not be contained. That is why a multi-level effort has been undertaken, repeatedly changed, and properly re-adjusted in order to effectively postpone the announcement of the bankruptcy for the time when it will not affect Europe in anything. Meanwhile, the leader of Greece’s right-center party first visited the criminal Israeli prime minister to accept his terms and announce an alliance with the Zionist country and then was supported by the US and the EU as head of a tripartite alliance and subsequently appointed as prime minister (although his party did not have the majority, having gathered only 31% at the last elections).

If rising to power, Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition will fast accumulate new debts to
a) comply with the orders of the Freemasonic institutions and governments that have systematically backed the opposition since January 2011 (and already before!) and
b) implement their economic policies, unrealistic promises, and demagogic pledges for which they need money that even now is not available in Egypt.

As the liberal – secular opposition’s leaders act similarly with their villainous and criminal patrons, their practices and policies will bring about a vast corruption, because they will appoint all their members and followers, tolerate large part of Mubarak’s nomenclature, and isolate the vast masses of population. They will try immediately to create a police-machine to support them in power, and the cities will be flooded by jobless fellahin because the destruction of agriculture will become target no 1 of a so-called democratic, liberal – secular government in Egypt.

Few months of a liberal – secular government in Egypt will finally unveil both, the secret reasons of Freemasonic support to today’s opposition and the ultimate target of the criminal Western Freemasons in Egypt. Few months of liberal – secular tyranny in Egypt will demonstrate why the Freemasonry-controlled, criminal, Western regimes abandoned their local puppet, Hosni Mubarak, and instigated the developments that took place in January – February 2011 in the Tahrir Square theater. Under Mubarak, the much wanted (by the Freemasonic masters of the world order) process of Egypt’s westernization, socio-economic corruption, social destitution, moral demolition, and national decomposition did not advance as fast as they needed. Of course, the inhuman global rulers would never trust any Egyptian Islamist party in power.

In fact, the secret Freemasonic target behind the Tahrir Square events was the definite substitution of Mubarak by some weak, ignorant and idiotic puppets of lesser importance (the ludicrous figures of El Baradei and Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes), who would speed up the process that Mubarak tried to slow down or even avert wherever he and his subordinates managed to notice it. If the Satanic masters of Freemasonry and the their puppets, e.g. the top rulers the present political world order, could automatically replace Mubarak with El Baradei, no Tahrir Square events would ever take place. That is all!

As a matter of fact, if today’s liberal – secular opposition manages in the future to climb to power in Egypt, the country will be ruled in exactly the same manner as under Mubarak, except the country’s foreign policy will be catastrophic for the national interests and the sociopolitical process will bring forth a vast and generalized destruction of the traditional values, elimination of the religious concepts, and collapse of the socio-behavioral system. An indescribable diffusion of materialistic, consumerist, pornographic ideas and practices will take place in order to eradicate any attachment to traditions, moral standards, and Islamic virtues.

Under a nefarious El Baradei – Hamdin Sabahy dictatorship, unemployment will be remedied with prostitution, and this concerns the imperiled Egyptian women not only within the context of their country, but also in a wider setup, which is made available by the monstrous Freemasonic fabrication ‘Euro-Mediterranean Partnership’ and the Satanic plan providing for a Union for the Mediterranean. The aforementioned silly and pathetic puppets will find it worthy to further integrate their country into the Euro-Satanic realm of villainous homosexual marriages and utmost sexualization.

Who promotes these contaminations worldwide?

Yahoo, MSN, Google and the other criminal Freemasonic – Zionist outfits, which already support El Baradei, Hamdin Sabahy, and their likes!

In parallel, increased agricultural imports and boosted consumerism (which translates to further imports) will unquestionably drive Egypt to its knees, and the bankruptcy will come in less than 2 years. A bankrupt Egypt will become the perfect tool at the hands of America, Europe, Israel, and their vicious, heinous and ominous ally, the colonial state of Abyssinia, e.g. Fake Ethiopia. At that time, the Nile waters conspiracy of the Freemasonic – Zionist gangsters will come to surface in all its dimensions to further function as an extra lever of pressure and ensure the final decomposition of the country.

If things reach that level, the outright majority of the Egyptian people, even if they manage to kick the so-called democratic, liberal – secular government out, will not have the chance to outmaneuver the evil plans against Egypt that the Freemasons and the Zionists have long prepared against Egypt and the valley of the Nile in general – including Sudan. That’s why it is important to keep today’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition under control, out of power, and in ramshackle, before they succeed to obtain power in Egypt.

This is the key point: beyond plans of political subversion of Egypt, beyond programs of social-behavioral and cultural disintegration of Egypt, and beyond projects of economic destruction and disastrous bankruptcy of Egypt, the Western colonial countries that are the international politics’ tools of the Freemasons attempt to harm the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country.

VII. Major threats against Egypt’s national integrity

What are the major points of the Freemasonic – Zionist projects in this regard?

– Creation of troubles in Port Said, Suez, and the Sinai – serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo and the Zionist state that will find itself ‘threatened’, and this will serve as ‘venue’ for Israel to interfere.

– Creation of troubles in Halaib. Serious deterioration of the relations between Khartoum and Cairo

– Nile water troubles. Serious deterioration of the relations between Cairo, Khartoum and the Anti-African, colonial state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) because of the construction of two dams (one in Atbara River and another in the Blue Nile); with strong US-European-Israeli support, the barbaric and genocidal state of Abyssinia will declare earlier treaties about the Nile water flow as not binding.

– Serious change in the Northeast African balance of power, with Khartoum getting greater Nile share in exchange with the formation of an anti-Egyptian alliance with the Neo-Nazi state of Abyssinia

– Advanced level of diffusion of separatist ideas among Nubians in both Egypt and the Sudan

– Without Egypt’s involvement, Sudan will soon disintegrate, with first Darfur and then Kordofan seceding. Longer the US, UK, French and Abyssinian embassies stay in Khartoum, closer the end of Sudan comes. Then, the Bejas in the East (Port Sudan, Sawakin and Kessala) will revolt and demand independence. This event will affect Egypt greatly, because the Bejas will demand for them the Halaib triangle and extra territory in Egypt’ extreme Southeast (Ras Banas, Berenice) that is inhabited by Egypt’s Beja minority.

– Becoming a landlocked country, Sudan will implode; the Nubians in the North will declare independence. This development will also affect Egypt, as big money is now being diffused to promote themes and motives of the Nubian political mythology.

VIII. Focus on the world’s most Anti-Egyptian state: the genocidal state of Fake Ethiopia

At this point, I intend to expand more on this subject; the racist, Satanic regime that controls Abyssinia is the world’s most inhuman, barbaric and criminal regime. More genocides have been perpetrated in the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia over the past 150 years than in the rest of the world.

Who is responsible for this?

The Satanic directorate of Freemasonry, and the subservient countries France, England, America and Israel that in different moments supported those who have been in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

Who are in control in Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)?

Two Semitic tribes that originate from Yemen, and crossed to Africa in repeated waves, before ca. 2500 years, e.g. the Amhara and the Tigray

Together, the Amhara and the Tigray constitute ca. 31% of the country’s total population; they basically live in the north of the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia, close to the borders with Eritrea and Sudan. The cruelest among them resettled in the Occupied Oromo capital city Finfinne (that bears officially the genocidal name ‘Addis Ababa’, a name given by the inhuman and Anti-African invaders), which is located at the colonial state’s geographical center, which is in reality the territory of Occupied Oromia. However, many Amhara and fewer Tigray are Muslims, whereas the rest are fake Christians (called Tewahedo – Monophysitic). It is in fact the Tewahedo fake Christian Amhara and Tigray who control the country of Fake Ethiopia. They are not more than 17% of the country’s total population.

The historical area of Abyssinia, prior to the Freemasonry-promoted expansion, was very small – less than half of Egypt’s Delta. It is a mountainous, arid territory. There was located the Amharas’ and Tigrays’ small and barbaric kingdom that was disdained by all Muslims across Eastern Africa after it was formed, around 700 years ago (1270).

Only after 1850, with the systematic and multifaceted support of the English and the French colonials, i.e. the servile tools of the global Freemasonic policy, the useless and tiny Abyssinian kingdom started expanding at the detriment of many great African kingdoms, notably those of the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Afars, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Agaws, the Somalis of Ogaden, and others.

How the Freemasonic gangsters of England and France helped the barbaric, incestuous, and inhuman tribes of Amhara and Tigray?

a) The English and the French colonials sold plenty of guns to them, and encouraged them to make war on the rest.

b) They managed to block any arms sales to the Oromos, the Hadiyas, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Somalis of Ogaden, and the rest, and

c) At the time England and France continued their Anti-African colonial wars in Sudan under the filthy and fallacious pretext ‘Abolition of slavery’, the two criminal states calmly allowed the Abyssinians to make a very profitable business by selling slaves and buying guns – to use them in the genocides that they were encouraged by the English and the French diplomats and military to perpetrate, and which they provenly perpetrated. Only the aforementioned truth is enough to show how vicious, duplicitous and evil are the gangsters who impersonate the diplomats, the agents, the scholars and the statesmen of England and France, and who are Freemasons in their majority.

After forming their colonial state (over the period 1840 – 1955), the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians preserved their monstrous country, Fake Ethiopia, through continuous, multileveled genocides that involved massacres of dozens of millions of subjugated people – and this is something that the Freemasonry-controlled newspapers of France, England, America, Canada, Australia, etc. have never mentioned, whereas the criminal, freemasonic TV channels of falsehood, BBC, CNN, NBC, Al Jazira, Arabiya, and their likes have kept, even until now, under silence.

The filthy political mythology and the related literature of the Amhara-Tigray Abyssinian tyranny is essential for every Egyptian to read, study, analyze, and assess as imminent and lethal threat against Egypt.

While infiltrating other countries, the Abyssinians methodically promote the culture of their barbaric, incestuous and filthy tribe that knows no notion of real faith, integrity, family, honesty, humanity, and honor. There is practically speaking no marriage among them; every man and woman can live together and separate at any time; they practice black magic extensively; many of them belong to a filthy group called Rastafarians who believe that the former bogus-king Haile Selassie was the Messiah and Jesus Christ reincarnate!!! They have many filthy practices that they keep secret; they are all addicted to drugs (cannabis in particular), but they are recognizable through their dreadlocks and their favorite colors yellow, green and red that are those of the flag of Fake Ethiopia.

Dreadlocks and the Abyssinian flag’s colours have recently infiltrated Egypt, and it would be crucial for the Islamic movements of Egypt to prohibit them, persecute the users, identify the traces of their contacts, and finally cut every connection these users may have with countries abroad.

Rastafarians appear to be a small religious group that first started in Jamaica (there are now ca. 100000 Rastafari and affiliates in the island nation) and still has few members scattered across the world (ca. 1 million people, mainly in Abyssinia); however, the reality is different. The Rastafarians as an instrumental Satanic sect; they defame the main historical religions of the world, like Islam, Catholic Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, and they serve locally as substitute to the fake Tewahedo Christianity of Abyssinia, and globally as support to the Freemasonic religious formations of Protestant Christianity (another heretical group) and Zionist Judaism (a vicious and villainous deviation from Orthodox Judaism). They are greatly involved in politics, and in this case, a good example is offered by the criminal gangster Jendayi Frazer, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, heading the Bureau of African Affairs, who was a key Rastafarian and promoted Anti-African policies and strategies of the worst sort.

Rastafarians manage to deceitfully attract sympathy as African originals whereas their faith is the absolute rejection of all African traditions and religions; using typical Marketing methods, they make of the show business (notably Bob Marley, and the entire reggae music, but not only) a key tool of their infiltration policy among unsuspicious populations across the world – and more particularly among targeted countries, like Sudan and Egypt. But, look at the following:

Rastafarians’ god is named Jah – just the first half of the Hebrew god Jahveh.

Rastafarians accept the Trinity as revealed in Haile Selassie pre-ascension name Ras Tafari (that they call the ‘power of the trinity’).

The perfect world or the Paradise for the materialist, godless Rastafarians is already called Zion! They believe they will achieve to live in it, if their barbaric and antihuman contamination is spread over sizeable parts of Eastern Africa and subsequently proclaimed as state religion.

Rastafarians accept as holy an execrable, filthy trash, i.e. a purely Satanic text of false historical claims that is called ‘Kebra Negast’. In it, the world’s history is viciously altered to fit Abyssinian – Zionist interests to the detriment of all – Christianity, Islam, Africa and the Mankind in general. Kebra Negast is an incredible forgery written by villainous and paranoid authors under fully demonic guidance. One can easily describe it as Satan’s bible.

In Kebra Negast and in other execrable texts of theirs, Rastafarians attempted to usurp the tradition of Queen of Sheba (Balqis) from Yemen. They have fallaciously associated it with Abyssinia, and they subsequently added tons of lies in order to justify their top target, namely the control of Sudan and Egypt by them, and the split of both countries’ territory between Israel and Fake Ethiopia.

Part of the vicious Rastafarian plan of Eastern Africa’s pornification, social decomposition, and moral degradation was the usurpation of the fair name of Ethiopia, which was an Ancient Greek and Latin name for the Kushitic state of Sudan immediately south of Egypt, with capital first at Karima (then Napata – for the period 800 – 500 BCE) and then at Bagrawiyah (then Meroe – for the period 450 BCE – 370 CE). The Ancient Sudanese state, which was named Ethiopia, was culturally – ethnically – linguistically unrelated to the Axumite Abyssinia which sheltered the first Yemenites who crossed to Africa mainly in the second half of the first millennium BCE, and who happen to be the ancestors of the Amhara and Tigray, the cruel tribes that rule tyrannically the colonial state of Fake Ethiopia. In no case, can Abyssinia be called Ethiopia, and this should be the basis of a Sudanese – Egyptian alliance against Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia). The only country that could rightfully be named ‘Ethiopia’ is Sudan.

Rastafarians deliberately call the entire Africa ‘Zion’!

Actually, the rest of the world is their enemy, and they call it ‘Babylon’ in a fraudulent effort of fallacious utilization of the old defeat of Judah and exile at Babylonia. But this makes the entire Islam part of Babylon, which is sheer distortion of both, historical truth and political reality.

In another forged statement of theirs, Rastafarians claim that they are the real Children of Israel!

The link between Fake Ethiopia and Israel is highlighted by the use of the title ‘Lion of Judah’ and by Rastafarians’ villainous goal to repatriate to their fictional Mount Zion. Even in Jamaica, they dirtied a place by naming it ‘Mount Zion’. Here one can remember the wicked songs by Bob Marley ‘Zion Train’ and ‘Iron Lion Zion’; it is to be remembered that in a degenerate manner, and contrarily to Islam’s moral orders and Egypt’s national interests, Amr Diab sang in Arabic few hits by Bob Marley.

In an insolence proportioned to their wickedness, Rastafarians propagate that Amharic will be the language of the Paradise, reject the idea that the heaven is in the sky, and place their fake paradise in Abyssinia. They are absolutely materialist in their theory because they believe that in the Hereafter, humans will have their physical bodies. This is an alarming warning to all the nations of Eastern Africa, either independent or subjugated: Rastafarians’ fake paradise will be the African nations’ ultimate hell.

Little matters whether the Rastafarians have the tacit support of the Freemasonic masters of the present global order. It the Rastafarians manage to achieve their plans, this will achieved only because of the African nations’ lack of foresightedness.

Quite ludicrously but also quite meaningfully, one group of Rastafarians is called ‘Twelve Tribes of Israel’.

Rastafarians justify their addiction to cannabis by referring and altering verses of the Hebrew Bible, and the Revelation; they also justify their dreadlocks in the same manner.

Finally, by supporting Afro-centrism (which should be top task for Egypt’s and Sudan’s academia, diplomats and intellectuals), they appear as the champions of Africa, exactly as the Freemasons want them to be, thus keeping Egypt and Sudan at the level of the academically, intellectually and educationally colonized countries that keep disastrously propagating the fake Greco-Romano-centric dogma of History that the French and English Freemasons and so-called Hellenists produced in the first place.

IX. Colonial academic falsehood promoted by both, Mubarak’s regime and the liberal – secular opposition, at the detriment of Egypt’s national interests

It is therefore time for us to examine now how much Mubarak’s academic – educational system damaged Egypt’s interests, through the promotion of colonial academic falsehood, and how the same will happen if Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition rises in power.

Ever since Napoleon and his Savants of the Institut de France arrived in Egypt, and following Egypt’s real secession from the Ottoman Empire and submission to effective colonial and Anti-Islamic rule which was nominally executed by the Freemason Muhammad Ali, Napoleon’s disciple in Satanism, Egypt’s educational and academic institutions were progressively adjusted and fully attuned to Euro-centric, racist, colonial historical falsehood.

This is a complete system of historical forgery that presents the Ancient Greek civilization as central to the entire world, exaggerates the importance of Greek and Roman presence in Africa, and places in Ancient Greece and Rome the origin of the modern European civilization. At the same time, the said system passes under silence the vast, enduring, determinant, multifaceted, and overwhelming impact of the ancient Oriental and African civilizations (notably the Egyptian civilization) on the formation of Ancient Greece, Rome, Christian Europe, and Modern Europe. Critical historical developments and processes, such as the extensive diffusion of Oriental, Persian, and Egyptian cultures and religions across the Roman Empire, are kept unknown to the average people (although experts are fully aware of the reality).

The historical forgery of Greco-Romano-centrism portrays the History of the Orient, Asia, and Africa as lower, marginal and unimportant if compared to the past of the West.

But by fully diffusing and duly imposing this false system across Egypt, the successive Egyptian administrations of the 19th and the 20th century, as well as the westernized Egyptian academia gave a disastrous picture of Egypt to other African and Oriental nations. They looked to them as totally subservient to the European and the American colonials. This development generated an antipathy for Egypt among Africans, and this feeling was progressively transformed into contempt and hatred, following the ceaseless Anti-Egyptian propaganda of the heinous diplomats and agents of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia).

Contrarily, by allying itself with countries, universities and movements that promote Afro-centrism, Fake Ethiopia tries to gain points and influence among unsuspicious, gullible Africans. This situation will continue, because Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition, if it rises in power, will be deceived by their own masters and promoters, who will first ask them to continue the same academic –educational falsehood that harms Egypt, Africa and Islam altogether.

At the political level, if Egypt’s liberal – secular opposition rises to power, their present supporters will deploy a great effort to minimize to the secular – liberal government of Egypt the possible damage Fake Ethiopia can do to Egypt, thus offering valuable time to the cruel Neo-Nazi rulers of Addis Ababa to advance in their plans, particularly at the level of the Nile water flow. Being cheated by their own promoters, Egypt’s liberal – secular parties and politicians constitute certainly the greatest internal danger for the country and all the Egyptians.

By being deeply anchored in Western and pro-Western schemes, ideas, theories and practices, the leaders of Egypt’s so-called democratic, liberal – secular opposition clearly demonstrate that they did not make a momentary alliance, but they are totally tied to Western guidance, and this proves that they will never have the ability to properly establish the always necessary criticism of the West. These political figures will not be able to distinguish between West’s interests and Egypt’s interests, and much less effectively defend their country at all levels.

Where does all this bring us?

It is clear that a liberal – secular government in Egypt will speed up the process of Egypt’s disintegration at all levels, national included.

X. Another dimension of threats to Egypt’s national integrity and physical existence

One has to complete the picture; the secession of the Sinai, the separation of Halaib and Egypt’s southeastern confines to serve the project providing for a Red Sea Beja state, and the independence of Nubia may look minimal or even unimportant, if one examines details through an unconventional viewpoint.

Even an eventual division of Egypt into two countries, Muslim and Christian, can be attested in the global mass media, and in some US-based Coptic portals. At this point, I have to stress that this threat should be taken seriously by every Egyptian; it is not a joke. Wherever there is a discussion about an eventual development that looks incredible from a first viewpoint, one must be sure that behind the discussion, there are hidden and real interests and that a substantive profit is anticipated by those who push toward this eventual development. In addition, one must take into consideration that projects that may have advanced very slowly for decades can suddenly get accelerated and be implemented within an unexpectedly short time.

But unfortunately, for today’s Egypt, evil circles have planned worse than the aforementioned; and this is even more serious, because it does concern merely the national integrity of the country, but its very physical existence! It relates to the very existence of the valley of the Nile, as it has always been known through millennia.

Before going ahead, I must point out that I don’t consider the expression of a threat as an ominous event that already took place. No! A threat is just a threat; not an event. But it can be materialized. And there lies the importance of a threat. If the threat, its sources, its factors, and its execution are identified, the threat can be addressed and averted; and in this case, the threat is not really dangerous anymore. But if the threat is not identified, if the execution of a threat is a matter of catastrophic oversight, and if the threatened entity continues living as if nothing happens, then we have to be sure that the threat will be materialized and the threatened entity will be submitted to its fate.

What is this threat about?

– A strange threat that is repeated in the mouths, in the speeches, in the texts of the worst enemies of Egypt

– A strange threat that is related with apocalyptic texts, with holy books of different peoples, notably the Old Testament

– A strange threat that some consider as prophesied long ago but able to be materialized only after the 1960s, because of the erection of a huge construction project – the demolition of which would entail the physical annihilation of the valley of the Nile

– A strange threat that can be materialized only now, because of the existence of advanced high technology – of which only few people today have a vague idea

– A strange threat that brings forth the physical annihilation of the land in an unprecedented way

This is certainly something that the people, the leading organizations, and the government of the threatened country must take very seriously, and fast react by proper, concerted action.

I should however add that this threat is nothing new; it was widely discussed among various circles in the past, although these discussions were never highlighted by the global mass media. At the time, prophecy experts and analysts or other theoreticians involved did not have it easy to explain the way by which the said prophecy would be materialized in the future. However, more recently, after 1965, several biblical interpreters came up with fresh, and more illuminated explanations.

Customarily, the threat is portrayed as a statement originally included in the holy book of the Ancient Hebrews, the Torah (Old Testament). But there have been plenty of geo-strategic implications, nationalistic attachments, side views, recent foretelling, odd oracles, political visions, and chauvinistic omen that further illustrated different approaches to and viewpoints of the statement. The subject may be vast to expand thereon here, but I intend to show key political ramifications.

A relatively recent presage was mentioned in the narrative of the Russian Military Officer, Explorer, and Orthodox Monk Alexander Bulatovich who was the tsar’s envoy to Abyssinia during the years 1896 – 1899 and carried out there many excursions, observations and explorations that he later wrote down in a voluminous opus. The narrative is included in the chapter about the family of the emperor.

As a matter of fact, this chapter is of great importance today for the diplomatic and national security services of Egypt and the Sudan, because the text reveals in detail what exactly the filthy, rancorous and wicked Amhara and Tigray Monophysitic (Tewahedo) Abyssinians have so well and so long tried to hide.

This chapter reveals that the regime, the elites and the upper classes of these incestuous and barbarous tribes, namely the Amhara and the Tigray, have persistently acted after a secret program (that they call “prophecy” because of their sick, abnormal and degenerate mind) to destroy Egypt and Sudan, and thus expand their cannibalistic tyranny throughout East Africa. Their ulcerous antipathy of Islam, their Anti-Coptic odium, their Anti-African hatred, their complete devotion to Satan, who is the real master of their incestuous and lawless society, and their desire to expand their rule throughout Eastern Africa is highlighted in the following excerpt:

“In one of the prophecies of Raguil to Atye Zadyngylyu (he received revelations in his sleep and then wrote them down), it is said that a king from the north will be with a king of Ethiopia one in spirit and one in heart. In another prophecy of Angel Auriel to Sahle Selassie, it is said that a king of the north and of Jerusalem will meet with a king of Ethiopia in Mysyr (Egypt) and will conquer Egypt. After this, they will divide among them all the land”.

It is essential to bring in mind that at the time this text was written there was no state of Israel and the entire territory of Palestine belonged to the Ottoman Caliphate.

The above text plainly testifies to the monstrous and inhuman nature of the genocidal Abyssinian state. Taking into consideration that the text was not written by a scientific explorer or a political philosopher but by the last tsar’s envoy, who had also the task to offer an alternative to the Abyssinian – English relations and increase Russia’s influence in the area, one can realize through the lines of the text the extent of the inhumanity and the evil deeds perpetrated by the monsters of Abyssinia over the invaded and occupied lands. Of course, these deeds were carried out with the approval of the English and the French, i.e. the colonial powers that never regretted, never repented, never apologized for their African Holocaust. These countries and their accomplices (euphemistically called allies) are the real supporters of the Egyptian secular- liberal opposition, and their support is only due to the continuation and advancement of the same murderous policies of which the present Egyptian secular- liberal opposition will be the next victim if they happen to rise in power.

The evil eschatological dreams of Greater Ethiopia threaten not only Egypt and the Sudan, but also other neighboring countries, such as Somalia and Eritrea, and more than the rest, all the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), e.g. the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Kaffas, the Shekachos, the Hadiyas, the Kambaatas, the Agaws, the Wolayitas and others, who also fight for their independence.

The diplomats and the administrators, the academia and the intellectuals, the imams and the priests, the deputies and the ministers of the aforementioned countries, and the liberation leaders and activists of the subjugated and persecuted nations of Abyssinia must study and fully understand the insightful documentation available in this book, which was published by the Russian explorer before 110 years. Only then, they will be able to properly assess the detrimental dangers that are dangling over their heads.

In and by itself, Alexander Bulatovich’s With the Armies of Menelik constitutes good reason for the entire world, and more specifically for all African and Islamic countries, to be greatly preoccupied with the source of every regional trouble and instability: the villainous Amhara and Tigray (Tewahedo) Monophysitic Abyssinian tribes that have perpetrated the world’s most abhorrent genocides, ruling tyrannically over the lands they invaded and over the nations they subjugated since the middle of the 19th century.

The fact that the uncivilized Abyssinians have lawlessly and shamelessly usurped the name of Ethiopia, which historically belongs to Sudan and to the Kushitic African nations, like the Oromos, the Sidamas, and the Afars, is only the top of the iceberg. They did so in order to falsely claim what is not theirs, and what has never been theirs: the Nile and the adjacent lands that the great river crosses.

The developments that are planned to trigger the above discussed ‘division’ of the territories of Egypt and Sudan (then named Mysyr) between Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and Israel involve something that was unknown in 1896: the destruction of Aswan High Dam and the elimination of life from the valley of the Nile and the Delta region for a period of 40 years.

Many modern preachers who belong to fake Christian denominations fabricated by the Freemasons, like the Evangelicals, often speak about this point, referring to the Old Testament and analyzing selected excerpts. What is described in those excerpts as a potentiality of divine punishment administered to the old times’ polytheistic wickedness is now shamelessly misinterpreted as pending punishment ‘due’ to modern times’ Egyptian Anti-Israelism, which in fact is a mere Anti-Ashkenazism or Anti-Khazarianism.

This effort of misinterpretation shows that cruel regimes’ and gangsters’ political wishes are easily linked to Biblical excerpts, as the evilness of the devious necessarily involves usurpation of God’s words. This illuminates the Satanic nature of the Freemasonry, and of their evil outfits, namely the fake Christian Tewahedo Monophysitic Abyssinians, the fake Jewish Zionists (Ashkenazi Khazarians), and the radically pro-Zionist, fake Christian Evangelicals.

The subject is highly dangerous for Egypt as it is linked to the entire issue of Nile River water dispute between Egypt, Sudan and Abyssinia. This only underscores the reality that longer the secular – liberal opposition is allowed to act in Egypt, fewer will be the chances of the Egyptian people to get plain information, assess the existing threats, and safely and timely take action. The secular – liberal opposition has become the perfect Freemasonic tool of destruction of the Nile valley, as it has only engulfed Egypt into internal strives that prevent the country from preparing for a faceoff with Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and from outmaneuvering the aforementioned evil Freemasonic plot.