The Enemies of Oromos & their Deeds: First & Second Colonization, Jesuit Reductions, Renaissance, and the Historical Revisionism of Racist Colonials – Part II

The present article is the second part of a long response that I sent to a US-based Oromo scholar, intellectual and activist, who wrote to me few months ago to ask my opinion about the possibility of the Oromo liberation movements to cooperate systematically with the government of Egypt on the basis of a plan providing for the liberation of Biyya Oromo and for the cancellation of the disastrous dam built on the Blue Nile in Benishangul province (Abyssinia, Fake Ethiopia). The first part of the article is here:

Oromos, Egypt, the Nile, Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), and the True Essence of Colonialism – Part I

In this –second- part, I expand on critical points of the History of Colonization and on the multitude of Crimes against the Mankind that the monstrous, evil and inhuman colonial powers – Spain, Portugal, Holland, France, England, Belgium, USA, and Israel – perpetrated for no less than 500 years, without having been duly punished thus far. Abyssinia’s colonization of numerous African kingdoms, notably those of the Oromos, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Hadiyas, the Ogadeni Somalis, the Afars and many others, only followed the patterns introduced by the Anti-Christian beasts of the above mentioned, barbarian Western European countries.

In fact, today’s Oromos, in their noble and most blessed effort to liberate their land, must come to terms with the impossibility of correcting one part of the evildoing without previously getting an accurate idea about the entire deed and the methods involved.

Second response to your questions about the chances of cooperation between the Oromos and Egypt (dispatched on 26th October)

Dear D.,

With a delay of several days, I continue my correspondence about the part of your first two emails that concerns the reasons for which Egypt will never cooperate with the Oromos. 

At this moment, I need to first make two key points.

I. First and Second Colonization: the Oromos and other Africans between the Jesuit Reductions to the Global Enslavement

Judging from your response to my first response to, I realize that you really have no idea about what colonization and colonialism have truly been.

Unfortunately, you cannot liberate any nation, let alone your own, before you duly understand the phenomenon that led to that nation’s (or your own nation’s) enslavement. 

Viewing things only at the material level is the foremost guarantee of your (and others’) failure.

Colonialism is NOT a material phenomenon, except for its most unimportant aspects and dimensions. 

Colonialism is basically a spiritual, cultural, religious, mental, intellectual, artistic, educational, academic, scholarly, social, identitarian, existential crime against the Mankind. The fact that this crime involved also dimensions pertaining to the economy, the military affairs, and the governance of the targeted nations is obvious, but it is far less important than the first mentioned dimensions.

Do not think that I use all these terms with the same connotation as most people worldwide today; so, if one term appears somewhat odd to you, feel free to ask me why I use it and what definition I give to it!

Certainly, the targets of the colonizing powers were different.

So, the Spaniards and the Portuguese had different targets in the late 15th, 16th c. and the early 17th c. than the Dutch, the French and the English in the late 17th c., 18th c., 19th c. and 20th c.

However, it is always erroneous, misleading and pathetic to evaluate things at the material level only.

Example: evidently the Spaniards and the Portuguese killed in the continent of the Mayas, Aztecs and Incas (Fake America – a term that must be abolished) more people than the Dutch, the French and the English massacred humans in Asia, Africa, and Central – Eastern Europe.

But this does not make of the Spaniards and the Portuguese «worse» colonizers (or «more inhuman») than the Dutch, the French and the English.

As a matter of fact, the latter were, truly speaking, incommensurately worse, because they did not kill bodies, but souls — in billions. 

If one fails to understand this reality, not only he will never understand what truly happened during the colonization process, not only he will not liberate any nation, but he will soon face a disastrous end, because of forthcoming developments that are intertwined with the entire 500-year long colonization process, which is still ongoing and which was machinated (by the powers that be, i.e. the secret organizations that are behind the criminal Western European states) -not only for what has already occurred but also and mainly- for what comes next.








As a matter of fact, with the progressive collapse of the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires (during the late 17th c., 18th c., 19th c. and 20th c. and through Dutch, French, English and US infiltration in both, the former Spanish & Portuguese colonies, and the colonial metropolises, namely Spain and Portugal), the victims of the first phase of colonization underwent a second colonization of typically Dutch, French and English nature (the latest stage of which is American). 

The difference between the two phases of colonization is due to the fact that different secret societies controlled the colonizing countries, namely the Western European kingdoms, which undertook the colonization attempts. The first colonization process was of purely Benedictine — Jesuit (in fact, the Satanic Jesuit Order is a reform or re-arrangement of the Anti-Christian Benedictine Order) machination; the second colonization process was of purely Freemasonic and Zionist machination.

Whereas there is a continuation from the Benedictines to the Jesuits (the secretively Anti-Christian Orders were overwhelmingly rejected by Orthodox Christianity), the Freemasons’ past is related to more ostensibly Anti-Christian Orders, namely the Rosicrucians, the Templars, the Cathars, the Manichaeans, and the Gnostics of the Late Antiquity). Last, the modern Zionists represent mainly the non-Semitic, non-Hebrew, non-Jewish, barbarian tribe of Khazarians (also called ‘Ashkenazi’) whose Kabbalism and Talmudism reflect the most ulcerous Pharisaic hatred against Jesus.

On the other hand, the atheistic, globalist, and anti-‘Eretz Israel’ group of Ashkenazi Zionists represent a form of Late Antiquity Sadducean Judaism at the spiritual-intellectual demonic level, and not at the ethnic-racial level, because the Ashkenazi, contrarily to the Sephardim, are -as I already said- ethnically alien to the historical Jews. All three distinct organizations, Jesuits, Freemasons and Zionists, confront one another in many ways; but it is wrong to envision all three organizations as granite-like entities. There have been several divisions among them (as I already mentioned about the Zionists), and these divisions played certainly a role in many historical developments. However, when it comes to both stages of post-1500 CE colonialism and colonization, all of these organizations were involved, and each of them tried to obtain greater benefit than their rivals.

The two different and successive phases of colonization represent however only different approaches to the end target and result. And the end target of all those involved in the colonial evildoing was the unification of all the people of the world in one ‘global’ state, following the century-long, monstrous project of overwhelming, absolute and irreversible cultural-educational deformation, spiritual-religious alteration, ethnic-national disfigurement, scientific-intellectual distortion. Following the ominous project, all identities and cultures, which had been developed throughout World History across the Earth, will be exterminated and the deformed humanoids, which will be left on Earth, will be subject to special medical care in order to become cyborgs thanks to the evil, so-called Artificial Intelligence technology. When it comes to theJesuits, Freemasons and Zionists,their sole differentiation as regards the end target concerns only the type of cyborg into which they want to transform (and thus exterminate) the Mankind.

Only if one learns and understands well what happened here and there during the two colonization phases, one is able to realize what is nowadays being prepared for the entire Mankind, following the distribution of the latest technological fallacy and falsehood called «mobile telephony», «computer-laptop-tablets», «Internet, MSM and social media», «smart mobiles and 4th-5th-6th G», «artificial intelligence», «IoT», «IoS», and so on. 

Not one Oromo will liberate his fatherland, not one Baluch will achieve true national independence, not one South Azeri will reach self-determination, and not one Berber will free his compatriots from the fake Pan-Arabist cholera of Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and Mauritania, before he studies what monstrous deeds and inhuman tortures the Western countries’ Satanic pseudo-Christians carried out in what is called «Jesuit reductions». About (Missões jesuíticas na América / Pueblo de indios / Riduzioni gesuite / Jesuitenreduktionen / Jezuïeten Verminderingen / Réduction (missions catholiques) / Иезуитские сокращения):Иезуитские_миссии_на_землях_индейцев_гуарани



Una delle prove che i gesuiti portarono al papa per non far distruggere quell’incredibile esperimento di convivenza fra Vecchio e Nuovo che furono le reducciones paraguaiane, e per evitare lo sterminio degli indios e la loro riduzione in schiavitù, fu proprio la capacità degli indigeni di cantare in polifonia e di comporre musica meravigliosa. Niente. di tutto questo è sopravvissuto. Fregio con angeli musicanti dai tratti somatici indios. Rovine di Trinidad, Paraguay, XVII sec. Michela Zucca. Servizi Culturali.
GESUITI, martirio di un religioso in missione in Sud America, trafitto con una lancia da un Indio. Dal volume: ‘Societas Jesu usque ad sanguinis et vi…
Título: COMBATE DE BOTOCUDOS EM MOGI DAS CRUZES Autor: SILVA, OSCAR PEREIRA DA Data: 1920 Técnica: ÓLEO SOBRE TELA Dimensões (a_cm, a_sm X l_cm, l_sm): 110-100-160-150 Coleção:FUNDO MUSEU PAULISTA – FMP Foto: José Rosael-Hélio Nobre-Museu Paulista da USP Acervo: Museu Paulista da USPDomínio Público
Evening light sweeps over the ruins of the Jesuit mission church at Trinidad de Paran‡ (Parana with acute accent on final a), Paraguay, where the bell tower of the site’s first of two churches stands. Scores of Jesuit missions in the area where Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil meet were built in the 17th century and abandoned when the Jesuits were expelled in the 18th century. Ruins of some of these missions still haunt hilltops in the region.
Drawing of a Jesuit mission and parade of Spanish colonial forces by Father Florian Paucke, a Jesuit missionary from Switzerland who lived and worked with the Mocobi tribes of Chaco. | Located in: Zwettl Monastery, Austria. (Photo by �� Bojan Brecelj/CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images)


What occurred against the Berbers in NW Africa, against the Somalis, the Oromos and many others in East Africa, against the (Muslim and Christian) Copts in Egypt, against the (Muslim and Christian) Aramaeans in the territories of today’s Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Jordan and Lebanon, against the Dravidians in the Deccan (today’s India’s southern half), against the Baluch in today’s SE Iran, SW Pakistan and South Afghanistan, and against so many other nations in the late 18th c., 19th c., and 20th c. had already happened to millions of unfortunate indigenous nations in the territories of today’s Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina and Bolivia during the 17th c. and the 18th c.: they were locked into the Jesuit reductions to be re-educated from scratch. This is of course complete disfigurement and comprehensive destruction of a person’s, society’s, and nation’s identity in every aspect. What first occurred in the continent west of the Atlantic was later implemented in Africa and Asia.

To the aforementioned one must add that the various technical differentiations between the second and the first phases of the Western colonization of the entire Earth are merely due to the diverse techniques and tactics, targets and trends associated with Freemasons and the Zionists (when it comes to the second phase of colonization) and with the Jesuits (when it comes to the first phase of colonization). But the monstrosity and the inhumanity of the methods and the evilness of the targets were indeed identical in all of the cases.

II. Renaissance’s Impact on the Second Colonization: the Revenge of Europe’s Barbarians over the descendants of the Oriental Nations that civilized Greece, Rome and Europe

As you have personally a limited experience of life, having become familiar to forms of cultural life, socioeconomic organization, and governance in only two countries (Abyssinia and US) and as you did not study the colonization process in all of its aspects in many different lands (Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa and the so-called New World), you cannot realize that 

the second phase of colonization was a far more elaborate, more sophisticated, more scrupulous in distortion, and more meticulous in identity-uprooting, in integrity-dismantling, in tradition-destroying, and -worse- in fake-identity-projecting-and-imposing onto the targeted nations.

If this complex colonial approach appears somehow bizarre and difficult to assess and comprehend, one can easily remove the doubts and the uncertainty. The difference in the colonial approach is due to this critical point:

– the lands, nations and cultures targeted for colonization during the second phase of colonization were part of the Ancient History of the colonizers.

This means that the ancestors of those targeted with colonization by the criminal and evil nations of Holland, France and England (and the Freemasons and Zionists who were the ruling forces in those God-damned countries) had interacted in many ways with the ancestors that these evil, anti-Christian nations believed as theirs. 

And this is the original and focal point of the colonial problem. If this sounds confusing for you, I will herewith analyze it extensively. Pretending to be the descendants of the Ancient Romans, the Western Europeans invaded the lands of Nations that the Ancient Greeks and Romans considered superior to them – only to spread barbarism.

The ancestors of the various nations of Iran, the Aramaeans of Mesopotamia, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, the Egyptians, the Eastern Romans (Fake ‘Greeks’), the Illyrians of Albania, the Cushites of Sudan, the Axumites of Abyssinia, the Arabs, the Yemenites, the Somalis of Azania, the Berbers of Libya, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco, the Turanians of Eastern Europe, Siberia, Central and NE Asia, the Dravidians and the other nations of South Asia had interacted with the Romans during the Antiquity, but from a position of superiority because, despite their military strength, the Romans were not as civilized as the Iranians, the Aramaeans, the Egyptians, the Cushites, the Phoenicians, and the Berbers. Actually, following its interaction with all the African and Asiatic nations, Rome was civilized by accepting several Ancient Oriental religions, before finally accepting Christianity, which was one more faith that came to Rome from the Orient.

But the ancestors of the Dutch, the French and the English were marginal and uncivilized barbarians during those times, as they constituted the poorest and the most underdeveloped provinces of the Roman Empire.

Later, with the diffusion of Islam and the rise of the Universal Islamic Civilization, the Western European nations felt even more inferior, impoverished, marginal, lower and worthless than their Oriental rivals whom they hated enormously for their superiority in everything. The historical reality was simple: true Christianity was in the Orient (Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria), not in Rome. The center of Islam was also in the Orient, whereas every European region that accepted Islam (the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily, and later Eastern Europe) was immediately rising in everything: Civilization, Spirituality, Wisdom, Knowledge, Sciences, Literature, Architecture, Arts, Wealth and Prosperity.  

The world’s misery and the most execrable barbarism were located only in one place: Northwestern Europe. These facts were well known to the French, the Dutch and the English. They therefore first identified themselves with the Ancient Romans and the Ancient Greeks, considering them as their ‘ancestors’; this was a totally mendacious pretension and a fully preposterous assumption. These Northwestern barbarians had in fact destroyed Christian Rome in 476 CE and they even rejected the imposition of Constantinopolitan Popes on Rome that Emperor Justinian I implemented in 537 CE; only in 752 CE, the Constantinopolitan popes were terminated, and the barbarian Franks stroke an alliance with the secretively anti-Christian, Benedictine-controlled pseudo-popes of Rome. About:

So, when embarking in their world-disastrous colonization projects, the (rancorous against the Islamic World that had controlled the Iberian Peninsula for more than 700 years) Spaniards and Portuguese, and later the French, the Dutch and the English viewed themselves as the descendants of the Ancient Romans. This fallacy is at the origin of all phases of world colonization; it constitutes the nucleus of the Modern West’s pseudo-historical dogma. Posturing as a Roman offspring, they wanted to invade and control all the territories of the Roman Empire, which before 500 years belonged mainly to Ottoman Empire. But instead of accepting Oriental religions, like the Ancient Romans did, the Northwestern European barbarians wanted to diffuse their pseudo-Christian religion and their evil, anti-Christian practices worldwide.

In reality, while pretending to diffuse Christianity worldwide, they spread a form of Satanism which is reflected in today’s collapse of moral standards worldwide. To do this, they needed a fake theory, a counterfeit and irreligious worldview, and a wide array of evil ideas, fake sciences, and historical distortions that would support their unsubstantiated but worldwide dangerous claims; and they truly composed the evil theoretical system that led numerous nations to extinction, caused many massacres and incredible genocides all over the Earth, plunged the colonized peoples to utmost misery, and turned the surface of the Earth into a real Hell.

Before the Western Europeans moved overseas to carry out their evildoing, the Benedictines-Jesuits launched a groundbreaking, anti-human and anti-Christian movement that uprooted the indigenous (European) nations’ identity, dismantled their integrity, destroyed their Christian tradition, and projected/imposed on them a fake identity. This evil movement is now called «Renaissance»:associated with it is also the Satanic Anti-Christian religious fallacy of Protestantism. Viewed spiritually and theologically, Renaissance is the epitome of Satan’s last plan against the Man; this conclusion is valid for all true, still existing religions that have been historically attested on European soil, namely Judaism, Christianity and Islam. 

The Satanic term «Renaissance» fully demonstrates its real nature: if Adam and Eva were created by God and this was the real «naissance» (birth) of the Mankind, who had the right to undertake a «second» birth of the Man (Re-naissance), except Satan himself, the ruler of the Western world?  

The Mankind cannot be reborn and must not be reborn. Rebirth or renaissance is not a need for any human.

But at the same time, the inhuman and evil term -in and by itself- exposes the Satanic nature of the deeds carried out within the spiritual, cultural, academic, educational, artistic, intellectual, mental, behavioral, social, economic, governance, and military contexts.

If Man, as created by God, acted for millennia in the way he did, a reborn fake, Satanic «man» would act as a counterfeit being.

His spirituality would be a counterfeit spirituality.

His culture would be a counterfeit culture. 

His knowledge, science and wisdom would be a counterfeit knowledge, science and wisdom. 

His education would be a counterfeit education.

His art would be a counterfeit art.

His intellect would be a counterfeit intellect.

His mind would be a counterfeit mind.

His behavior would be a counterfeit behavior. 

And consequently, his society, economy, governance and military would be a counterfeit society, economy, governance and military. 

And this is what happened worldwide through the two phases of colonization that ushered us into the Modern World, the two World Wars, the so-called ‘international community’, and the technology-savvy global society.

The Western European nations’ Christian identity, which existed until ca. 1400 CE, was subsequently replaced by the fake identity that the Renaissance elites projected and imposed on the Western European nations. The average people were then taught that they were the descendants and the heirs of the Ancient Romans and Greeks in terms of race, language, culture, art, civilization, spirituality and religion. That was an execrable lie that triggered the World History’s worst bloodshed. 

There were no descendants of the Ancient Romans and Greeks in 1400, except in Sicily, the Balkans, and in Anatolia: the Eastern Romans. Italy had been flooded by various Germanic and other invaders for centuries. The territories of today’s Germany, Holland, France, Belgium, England and Switzerland were Roman provinces but few Roman administrators and military lived among the indigenous nations. The same concerned the Iberian Peninsula where the Reconquista against the Islamic state(s) was about to be completed ca. 1400 CE. All these lands were inhabited by Ostrogoth, Lombard, Visigoth, Frankish, Germanic and other nations that had accepted Christianity, which was basically rejected by the Ancient Romans and the Greeks — and this had caused (during the 4th, the 5th and the 6th centuries) far greater bloodshed than that triggered by the diffusion of Islam later.

In Central, Eastern and Northern Europe, around 1400 CE, Turkic, Slavic and Nordic nations were living, and in those lands, the various indigenous nations were in their majority Muslims; that’s why they were out of the sphere of Western European influence and control, they were unrelated to Renaissance, and they did not participate in the colonization process.

The projection of the fake, Ancient Greek and Roman, identity onto 15th – 16th c. Western Europeans is the long process, which from those days down to our times terminated, step by step, every shred of true Christianity; there are no more Christians nowadays; all those, who say they are, are paranoid liars.The evil champions of the Renaissance started with naked statues, which were totally prohibited in Europe during the Christian times (there are no Dark Ages — that’s a fallacy; the World History’s only Dark Age is the time we are living in), and they ended up with the vicious shames of sodomy, so-called marriages of homosexual ‘couples’, premarital sex, etc., and with the monstrous crimes of abortion, children’s adoption by homosexuals in our days, transgender paranoia, etc.




It would take long to explain why this unfortunate, catastrophic and antihuman development (‘Renaissance’) happened; however, one has to always bear in mind that, in reality, Rome has almost always been a fake Christian city inhabited by the Christian religion’s worst enemies, who survived for many hundreds of years (after 752 CE and the termination of the Constantinopolitan popes), always hiding their true face under a Christian mask. The only truly Christian theological doctrines of the Christian World were represented
a) by the Nestorian Great Church of the Orient (headquartered at Seleucia-Ctesiphon in Central Mesopotamia),

b) by the Monophysitic (Tewahedo) patriarchates of Antioch and Alexandria, and c) by the «Orthodox» patriarchates of Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria and Constantinople. 

The principal Anti-Christian forces hidden in post-752 CE Rome were the Origenist monks of the Benedictine Order, who were later transformed (in their major part) into the Societas Jesu, i.e. the Jesuits (in the early 16th c.).

During the first phase of the colonization process, the criminal Western European conquistadores victimized many nations, namely the Aztecs, the Mayas, the Incas and many other great and noble nations of the falsely called ‘New World’, but also numerous nations in Africa and Asia, notably East African and Somali Muslims, Mongols and Dravidians in the so-called ‘India’ (mainly in the coastal regions of the Mughal Empire), Aramaeans in the territories of both, the Ottoman and the Safavid Iranian empires, Omanis, Turanians in Eastern Europe (so-called ‘Russia’) and Siberia, Malay, Filipino and Indonesians in SE Asia, and others.

During the second phase of the colonization process, the criminal Western European conquistadores victimized an even greater number of nations, involving all the aforementioned (the colonization has in reality been an ongoing process down to our times), but also Muslim and Christian Copts in Egypt, Berbers in Algeria, Eastern Romans (re-baptized «Greeks») in the South Balkans, Albanians, Yemenites, Baluchs, Muslim Cushites of the Sudan and many other nations in Asia and Africa.

However, one must always take into consideration the fact that, before victimizing others, the Western Europeans were victimized first by their own criminal rulers.

Colonialism is then a mere exportation of a spiritual and material crime.

III. Second Colonization: Creation of Servile Elites to locally diffuse post-Renaissance Fake Sciences, Historical Revisionism and Self-disdain among Colonized Nations  

The Western Europeans’ fake identity was encrusted in their evil hearts and paranoid minds with

a) an enormous dose of racism,

b) tons of racial arrogance,

c) an unprecedented fallacy about race superiority,

d) an immensely documented (via either distorted historical sources or concealed ancient texts or modern bibliographical forgery) falsehood about their ‘ancestors’ having supposedly been the creators of the Human Civilization, and

e) an enormously poisonous injection of overwhelming disdain for all the others, for any other, and for all those who were not «theirs».

This was normal as a vicious and villainous propaganda process after all; no fallacy and no deception can ever be accepted by peoples and nations without being interrelated with flattery, ego-promotion, and evil sentimentalism based on hatred of the others — something that is tantamount to inhuman self-exaltation after Satan’s fashion. 

These monstrous criminals, the founders of the Renaissance forgery, created all the fake, so-called modern sciences, which do not have the value of

even one millionth of the Medicine of the Ancient Egyptians before 5000 years or 

even on thousandth of the Medicine of the Ancient Cushites of Napata and Meroe or

even on hundredth of the Medicine of your Oromo ancestors before 500 years.

Irrespective of whatever you and many others may say, today’s fake and evil science cannot produce even one mummy after the Ancient Egyptian-Cushitic fashion. This fake, modern science ostensibly destroys the Nature that your own Oromo, Cushitic and Hamitic ancestors preserved as holy since the days of the Flood. At the same time, the fake science of the last centuries gravely harms the physical capacities of every human body.

And if you have any doubt about what I say, go to a museum, find the complete armor of a soldier before 500 years (as I personally checked the armor of the typical Safavid Iranian soldiers in museums and antiquaries when I lived in Iran), and then wear this extremely heavy armor, keep in your hands a shield, a lance for jousting or a sword, and try to run for 40 kilometers in the mountains like a soldier of those days. If you cannot, your lamentable incapacity is the result of your fake Medicine.

The only effect that your fake Medicine has on humans is to weaken, debilitate and sicken them; and, I am sorry (!), also to effeminate them, by detaching them from Nature, by cutting them off the normal landscapes where humans must live and work (in agriculture, cattle-keeping, fisheries or trade/transportation of goods across distances), and by keeping them in unholy and anti-Godly urban centers. 

How many Oromo homosexuals exist among 1000 Oromos living in a village 50 km SE of Adama and how many homosexuals live among 1000 pseudo-human inhabitants of the cursed cities of New York and Washington D.C.?

You know of course that there is no comparison! Why? Cherchez la femme!!

The reason for this degeneration is the disastrous and misleading fabrication of the modern fake sciences, notably Medicine (involving all its branches, and more particularly Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychology that target the interconnection of the soul and the body in humans), Law (that helps only breach Transcendental  Moral and produce immoral regulations), Engineering, Humanities, Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and the rest. And the same happens in, and concerns, every post-Renaissance science; History is a fake History, Law is a lawless Law, and Astronomy is a paranoia starting with the filthy, mendacious clown Copernic. 

Spiritually weaker and morally feebler, the Freemasons and the Zionists of the Renaissance days fell also victims of the Renaissance fabrication of the Benedictines-Jesuits. Terribly deceived, they even thought that they could eventually turn the overall fake cultural-intellectual system to their benefit. However, there is no lie or constructed falsehood that can eventually be beneficial to anyone, except to those, who like the Freemasons and the Zionists, communicate with lower diabolical hierarchies. 

Totally disconnected from any major spiritual level, possessed by lower demons (as it is evidenced by the contracts that they sign with them in their evil lodges), and determined to push the Jesuits out of the control of this world (but ignoring how vain this attempt would be over the centuries), the Freemasonic and Zionist elites of 17th c. Holland, England and France embarked on an enormous effort of writing down every existing material detail in the most scrutinized possible form and all this in total distortion of the reality.

That’s why modern sciences are so much more verbose than the Ancient Sciences. Compare a modern text related to the academic discipline of Natural Sciences with an ancient Assyrian or Egyptian text written before 3500 years about a similar topic! The old texts were tiny portions of today’s texts. But, on the contrary, the knowledge was higher and the wisdom incalculably superior, because the ancient wise elders, the hierophants, and the high priests knew that the Truth is never said. It is only enacted. Truth in human action is only the practice of what the Ancient Romans used to call ‘Divina Studia’; this is a spiritual activity, not a mental-material activity. 

This formation of the Freemasonic-Zionist scholarly establishment led to enormous corpuses of detailed description like the Hortus Malabaricus by the Dutch and the ominous La Description de l’Égypte by the French. These attempts were the most illustrious ones among many other similar but lesser efforts. In this manner, entire countries were comprehensively robbed and taken away. 

The decayed local inhabitants did not even understand what happened to them.

Soon, new local elites (in Egypt, Greece, Algeria, Aden, and other provinces of the Ottoman Empire, but also in 19th c. colonized India, Central Asia, Iran and elsewhere) started being formed by indigenous anthropomorphic monkeys, who wanted to exchange their servility, their submissiveness, and their docility with material benefit, and social promotion in their ‘new’ but fake country, which had however already ceased to exist, since its real natural wealth and technical manmade magnificence had been stripped by the Western colonial Orientalist gangsters. Even the filthiest animal has a certain degree of dignity and a sense of self-respect that is inherent with the instinct of self-preservation; but these local elites did not have any.

This development, observed already in the early Dutch, French, English and Russian colonies and attested later in almost all the territories that were directly or indirectly colonized, brought about the new pseudo-human that the Benedictine-Jesuit Renaissance-forgers had promised through use of the term ‘Renaissance’.

Demented local elites of ignorant and besotted apes and parrots, able to imitate their Western masters and to repeat what their colonial lords ordered them, accepted to play the role of subordinate, one-use charlatans and clowns, who believed all the historical lies that their colonial teachers told them about the Greek-Roman civilization and its supposedly central position in World History. 

The states that emanated from the colonial detachment of the Ottoman are all stillborn babies damned in the Life of the Dead; they are fake states of no-nations, no-humans, no-living beings. They have no self-respect, no dignity, and no instinct of self-preservation. And only Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey made the difference.

I explained the topic in this article:




About the total impossibility of Modern ‘Egypt’ to first duly understand and then properly defend its ‘national’ interests, identifying opportunities and alliances, I will expand in my response’s next part. However, it would be an oxymoron to expect anything different; how can a non-nation possibly understand its hypothetical, ‘national’ interests?  

Best regards,



Download the article in Word doc:





RED-SKINNED RAMSES III AND ISIS, HOLY SYMBOL OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HELIOPOLITAN DOGMA (Isis’ right hand strengthens the Pharaoh’s electric fluids by transferring power to his nape; Isis’ left hand consolidates the Pharaoh’s magnetic fluids by attaching his solar plexus to her. / Ramses III raises his right hand to take an oath and connect with the divine electric fluids; by his left hand, he connects himself with Isis’ lumbar spine, i.e. the emanation of the divine magnetic fluids.)


Note: To read details about the pictures, download them!

Sponsored Post Learn from the experts: Create a successful blog with our brand new courseThe Blog is excited to announce our newest offering: a course just for beginning bloggers where you’ll learn everything you need to know about blogging from the most trusted experts in the industry. We have helped millions of blogs get up and running, we know what works, and we want you to to know everything we know. This course provides all the fundamental skills and inspiration you need to get your blog started, an interactive community forum, and content updated annually.

Oromos, Egypt, the Nile, Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), and the True Essence of Colonialism – Part I

* Dedicated to the outstanding paradigm, the enlightening path, the indomitable bravery, and the paramount valor of Hachalu Hundessa, the World’s Greatest 20th-century Hero

For a major, African, subjugated nation, like the Oromos of East Africa, who are comprised within the tyrannical colonial state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and the  neo-colonial construction named ‘Kenya’, any perspective of alliance with a regionally important state would make sense in view of their struggle for national independence and cultural self-determination. Particularly, if there are serious fields of cooperation against a common enemy! Undoubtedly, the criminal state of Abyssinia, which is the world’s most disreputable cenotaph, has produced several enemies over the past 170 years, as it expanded at the detriment of many African kingdoms and it attempted to interfere in the affairs of other nations or deprive neighboring states from natural resources.

If one takes into consideration Egypt’s dependence on the Nile, Abyssinia’s (Fake Ethiopia’s) paranoid effort to erect an unnecessary, enormous dam in the Blue Nile ( /, the ensuing colossal dangers (either environmental or geomorphological), the vicious, historical hatred of Egypt (under all regimes, namely Mamluk, Ottoman, Khedivial, royal and republican) that the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians have harbored for no less than seven (7) centuries, and the history of the relationship between the two states over the past 200 years, one concludes that the alliance with the Oromos must appear as a great opportunity to the present rulers of Egypt (by ‘present’ I mean all the administrations starting by the year 2010 when the Blue Nile dam definitely became an urgent matter for Cairo).

Unfortunately, this is not the case; the Cairo despots do not see this eventuality as an opportunity. Worse, they have no idea about the Oromos. Even worse, they don’t even know themselves in the first place. It appears truly bizarre, but in fact, it is not.

Historical identity, moral-cultural integrity, educational-social self-awareness, identity-based governance, comprehensive understanding of international relations, and accurate perception of all the factors involved in the bilateral relationships (Egypt-Abyssinia/Egypt-Oromos) do not exist among the governors of Egypt. Even worse, the entire Egyptian elite (academic, religious, economic, administrative, military, political) is totally ignorant and therefore absolutely unable to see clearly things, developments, factors, plans and perspectives at least at an acceptable level.

In fact, the previous paragraph functions as a negative conclusion as regards the evaluation of a potential Oromo – Egyptian systematized alliance and methodical cooperation. However, it is worthy for all Oromos to duly assess the depth of the problem, because by describing Egypt’s inability to act according to its own obvious, national interests, one reveals the essence of Western colonialism and the evil deeds that the colonial powers of France and England and their successor, namely the US, performed across the territories that they colonized.

That’s why I will publish now, in a series of articles, my correspondence with a US-based Oromo scholar, intellectual and activist, who wrote to me few months ago to ask my opinion about the topic. What follows here is the first part of the correspondence.

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Thabo Jaiyesimi/SOPA Images/Shutterstock (10701160c) A justice for Haacaaluu placard during the demonstration. Ethiopian Oromo community in London protest demanding justice for Slain singer, Haacaaluu Hundeessaa. Haacaaluu sang in the Oromo language, Ethiopia’s largest ethnic group and his music became the melody of a protest movement that helped bring down Ethiopia’s government in 2018. Ethiopian Oromo community protest in London, UK – 03 Jul 2020
ST PAUL, MN – JULY 08: Members of the Oromo community march in protest after the death of musician and revolutionary Hachalu Hundessa on July 8, 2020 in St. Paul, Minnesota. The protesters called for Internet service to be restored in Ethiopia that was shut down on June 30. Community leaders also urged the U.S. to aid in the release of Oromian and American prisoners. This latest protest follows the death of Hundessa, who was murdered in Ethiopia on June 29. His death has sparked ongoing protests around the world. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)


First response to your questions about the chances of a cooperation of Egypt with Oromos (dispatched on 16th October)

Dear D., 

Hope you are doing well and you have got a basic idea about everyday life in Egypt thanks to my earlier email! All those points were merely an introduction. Now comes more!  I will now respond to the following points that you made in your emails of 5.10.2020 and 11.10.2020.

Excerpt from your email of 5.10.2020:

Why wouldn’t Egypt support our struggle? What shall we do to shift power balance towards ourselves in that empire?

Excerpt from your email of 11.10.2020:

You are right. Several books could be written on why Egypt is not supporting the Oromo struggle and why the Oromo and other oppressed nations in the Ethiopian empire are not free yet after the relative end of colonialism in many countries. 

I know Egypt has many internal issues and problems. Still, we have mutual interests: we need support in our struggle, and Ethiopia threatens their Blue Nile river water resource. If this does not make us friends, I don’t know what could. I look forward to reading your further explanations. 

I know J. D., who resides in Belgium. He is a dedicated Oromo advocate and lives to serve our nation. Thank you for sharing his biography. It makes sense that he has also been asking the same questions. 

So, dear D., you may wonder why of all Oromos, Oromo academics, Oromo politicians, Oromo liberation fronts’ activists and leading advocates and Oromo parliamentarians I chose J. D. to mention in my previous email. 

I. An Early but Failed Oromo Effort to establish Political Contacts with the Mubarak administration

The reason is that what you ask me about the chances of cooperation between Egypt and the Oromos is a topic that I extensively discussed with him already back in 2010. It is an entire story and it is quite revelatory; that is why I will discuss it with you now. 

No! Contrarily to your assumption, I never met him physically. We exchanged emails and telephone calls. As my articles about the Oromos and many other oppressed nations in Africa and Asia were extensively discussed, J. contacted me first and, of course, I replied enthusiastically. This started a cooperation that lasted several years but lost momentum after I had to concentrate on other issues for quite long, starting by the year 2012.

In 2010, beyond many other topics I was expanding on, I published numerous many articles and series of articles about the Nile dispute issue, several interviews with Oromo politicians, liberation front leaders, and activists. I also wrote much, defining what Egypt’s and Sudan’s correct stance toward Abyssinia should be. I made known several serious dangers lingering for Egypt and Sudan because of very old, existing Abyssinian and Zionist plans against these two lands. Last, I extensively featured the Russian Czarist envoy Bulatovich’s expedition in Abyssinia (which took place back in the 1990s) and his books, re-publishing sizeable excerpts. In only 2010, I published 465 articles online. Quite unfortunately, all three portals where I used to publish my articles (American Chronicle, Buzzle, and AfroArticles) have closed down for various reasons in the period 2013-2015. Some of my articles are still available online — mainly republished at the time or slightly later in several blogs, sites, and fora.

As a matter of fact, in the period 2004-2013, I published in total more than 1800 online articles. When the portals were gradually closed, I decided to open an account in in order to mainly republish all these articles. You probably know my account: 

Unfortunately, I did not have enough time to publish more than 320-350 articles (out of ca. 1800 articles) until now. In total, you will find 493 articles in my account, but there are also many other articles (published before 2004), speeches, books, comments on my articles, mentions, quotations, new articles, etc. 

I hope that soon I will start republishing again more articles from that period and that one day I will be able to complete the republication process, which means that I still have another 1400 articles to republish! Recently, when in Aswan, I managed to republish the 29-article series about Bulatovich’s expedition (as per the above mentioned description of my 2010 articles’ contents). Here you have the links to the 29 republished articles:

Arranged in chronological order, the complete list of the titles of my online articles published in the period 2004-2011 can be found here:

However, before discussing the topic about the possibility of an Oromo – Egyptian alliance, I find it necessary to make a distinction between two points. As a matter of fact, there is an enormous difference between

a. writing about the need of Egypt to support the liberation of the Oromos, the formation of an independent Oromia, and the total dismemberment and annihilation of the rancorous, tyrannical and inhuman state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) — which would automatically cancel the evil project of the dam in Benishangul,


b. anticipating that Egyptians (as state, government, diplomats, academics, military, journalists, etc.) understand this need as real for Egypt. 

A chaos separates these two points. Yes, it is worthy writing about it. By so doing, you certainly tell the truth. The possibility and the potential benefits of this alliance must be pointed out; this is good for all. But no! You must not anticipate that this truth will be understood by the Egyptian elites. Actually, to properly comprehend the need for this alliance, the Egyptian elites must cease to be who they have been ever since Napoleon invaded the Valley of the Nile (1798) and the French colonized and deformed the local people.

But unfortunately, J. did not read my articles correctly and accurately. He took them very enthusiastically. That was very wrong. He did not ask me even once «how will this alliance be achieved?» or «do the Egyptians realize that this alliance is a real need for their survival?» or «how can we make the Egyptians understand that an alliance with us, the Oromos, constitutes a real need for their own survival?».

So, J. took these articles of mine at face value, thinking that the only thing that was left to be done was only the initiation of some contacts and the preparation of an agenda of common activities. That was thoughtless, counter-productive, and therefore useless.

Even worse, my discussion of the topic with J. occurred in the second half of 2010, when I already knew that numerous regional regimes in Asia and Africa were under imminent threat of prompt destruction, due to advanced subversion activities that had been carried out for long without the idiotic local dictators ever understanding anything. What was silly and inane? Example: it was cretinous for Mubarak to think that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were his friends and trusted allies. It was the disreputable, criminal prostitute Hillary Clinton who was calling Mubarak on Friday 28th January 2011 to urge him to resign because there were “some dead in Tahrir Square”! If your allies are like this, how will your enemies be?

What was later called (in a most fallacious and ludicrous manner) «Arab Spring» (it was not Arab, because there are no Arabs except for Saudi Arabia, and it was not a spring but inimical foreign involvement) had already been known to me perfectly well as the preparatory work for the long-planned project «Greater Israel» (which basically failed – at least until now) as early as 2006-2007. Erdogan’s rise was already part of the entire project, and this is one of the reasons, I have totally rejected this ignorant and idiotic person, publishing extensively and systematically against him and clashing with many of my Turkish compatriots. Examples:

In October 2010, I was expecting the impending end of Mubarak, because I had vast information about the preparatory work carried out across the country; actually, a great number of local and international sources were then updating me on daily basis. The rhythm of the preparations was so frenzied that one could even give dates of the planned events that took place few months later. Furthermore, I also knew at the time that the government and the Mubarak family knew absolutely nothing of what was underway. It was clear that they would be swept away like a tree’s fallen leaf gone with the wind.

It was then that J. asked me to prepare for him some contacts with the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, because he intended to come to Cairo. Of course, I tried to dissuade him. I told him that it was premature; I explained that an enormous preparatory work should first take place, involving contacts with journalists, the formation of a group of Cairo-based Oromos (with whom I had already dense contacts and who were fluent in Arabic and could therefore translate from Afaan Oromo to Arabic), and the detailed elaboration of an agenda as per which well informed, through my numerous past articles and many more forthcoming ones, following meetings with me and the Cairo-based Oromos, and thanks to the enumeration of all points of the entire spectrum of issues pertaining to Egypt-Sudan and Abyssinia, several famous Egyptian journalists and academics would be at last motivated to expand on all these topics in Arabic, publish much about them and on regular, systematic basis, and ultimately to contact diplomats and ministers in view of the subsequent formation of a real tsunami for a much needed, new East African policy of Egypt.

Do not think that this process would be easy or short-term!

And do not imagine that it would not meet resistance or opposition in Egypt itself already! 

The tendency to «do nothing while in government» has deep roots in the French colonization of Egypt back in 1798. 

But all this was incomprehensible for J., who viewed Egypt as a real country and a regional power, which is very false. Any portion of regional influence that Egypt may be exercising every now and then is exclusively due to foreign, colonial authorization and nothing more. However, despite his troublesome hastiness and complete unpreparedness, I still consider J. as far better and more realistic than any other Oromo politician, activist, scholar, advocate and liberation movement leader, when it comes to efforts in view of Biyya Oromo’s liberation. But one must have some idea about the technical know-how in the local political making.

I told him that he had to spare the journey, but I was not listened to. I told him that I would be dishonest with myself, if I met him personally during his stay in Cairo for few days. I gave him the telephone numbers of some Cairo-based Oromo friends of mine and he contacted and met them, but I did not meet him. It was November 2010; his trip brought of course no results, and writing to me from Belgium, J. finally accepted that I was right to advise him not to come, because it was «too early». Long preparations had to be undertaken, before he came. He realized that the people whom he met in the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs were ignorant and knew nothing of East Africa. Truly nothing!

Well, in less than 3 months after his visit to the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the government and the president of Egypt were already overthrown. This concludes the case about the uselessness of that trip. I wanted to narrate this story to you as a preamble to my complete response about your «otherwise logical» suggestion! After the above you can guess what will come as next, I mean as proper part of response. 

Words do not exist to describe the Egyptian inaptitude, ignorance, and idiocy at all levels (and mainly the governmental one); however, do not think that Egypt is an isolated case! Not at all! All colonized or semi-colonized countries have been fooled, deceived, and misled by the colonial powers. It is a vast topic; so immense it is that you cannot grasp even a small portion of it. But you will understand what I will describe to you in my response’s main part, because you, as an Oromo, are better off than an average Egyptian or Syrian or Algerian or Pakistani or Turkish Islamist or Nigerian or Malay or Indonesian (although this may seem to you difficult to believe now).

Look at this extreme Egyptian idiocy: early January 2011, Gaddafi traveled to Cairo and thence he continued with Mubarak on Egypt’s presidential airplane further to Khartoum to say to Sudan’s Al-Bashir not to accept South Sudan’s secession and independence. The idiots! Few months later they were overthrown! Little idiot of Mubarak and what a pity for his useless country! They woke up in December 2010! Hahahaha! The idiots!,37342

Do you know how late they were? My articles will show this to you! The following titles and dates are taken from the following link that I already added earlier.

Will South Sudan Be an Independent Country? Most Probably Not! Lessons for Ogaden, Afar, Oromia / 12-1-2011

South Sudan: US – UK Interference, Colonial Practices, Biases & Gogrialization Rejected by Nuer / 13-1-2011

South Sudan, Its Indigenous Peoples, and their Evil Enemies / 17-1-2011

Independent and Free to Die: South Sudan Facing Colonial Threats, Tribal Conflicts, Land Grabbing / 18-1-2011

South Sudan News: Nominal Independence, Explosive Situation, Colonial Threats, Ensuing Risks / 19-1-2011

After South Sudan, Referendum for Secession Needed in Ogaden and Oromia (Abyssinia, Fake Ethiopia) / 22-1-2011

These are my January 2011 titles on the topic.

But do you know when Mubarak and Gaddafi should have traveled to Khartoum to prevent developments?

When I first wrote about the topic! Look at the titles and the dates!

Open Letter to President al Bashir of Sudan – Out of the Arab League Now! / 31-8-2004

The Last Chance for Sudan to Exist: Get Out of the Arab League Now! / 1-9-2004

The Last Chance for Sudan to Exist: Get Out of the Arab League Now! Part II / 5-9-2004

More than 6 years late the two idiots were!

II. No Liberation without True Understanding of the Nature of Colonialism 

Your main problem in this regard is not that you, all the Oromos, don’t know Egypt, but the fact that you don’t understand truly and in depth what colonialism is. You are not alone in this. Many nations and state administrations believe that they have formed independent countries, but they are wrong in their assumptions. As a matter of fact, a great effort has been deployed by the colonial powers themselves in this regard; one can truly find an abundant literature against colonialism worldwide. To no avail!

It is all useless and wrong.  And it is all written by fake enemies of the colonial powers and false opponents of colonialism; I mean that they think they oppose the colonial powers whereas in reality they help them greatly. Worse, this enormous but erroneous literature is supported, paid and diffused by the colonial powers because it greatly serves them as smokescreen. What do you read in all these useless books and articles? Condemnation of the economic exploitation and of the political interference carried out by the colonial powers against the colonized nations.

That’s silly, pathetic and evil, because it hides the most tragic truth that opened the way for the entire annihilation of the Mankind, which is very close. 

Economic exploitation, social intrusion, political interference and military utilization of another nation’s resources are totally unimportant. These conditions matter for less than 0.1% of the colonization process.

The real essence of colonialism, the abysmal destruction that it causes, the irrevocable extermination that it brings about, the most disastrous effect of this criminal and evil act are to be found at totally different, and far more important, levels.

The aforementioned levels (economic, social, political and military) are all various dimensions of material life. Unquestionably, material life is totally unimportant for humans, for faithful humans, for Waaqeffatas, for Muslims, for Christians, for Buddhists and others.

The only dimension that matters in a human’s life is the spiritual existence. We are primarily souls. We come -only for a brief passage of 100 years or even less- from the spiritual universe that is infinite to the tiny material universe, which has nothing in common with the fallacy of the so-called ‘space’ and the absurd and nonsensical narratives of today’s pseudo-scholars about galaxies. Our spiritual identity and integrity is all that matters to every human, who has not yet been turned into an atheist and materialistic, consumerist and sexist animal ready for due annihilation and merciless extermination. 

The spiritual identity of a human involves all important activities of the Civilized Man: cult, meditation, prayer, moral behavior, values and virtues, religion and theology, traditions and literature, arts and wisdom, knowledge and education, culture and civilization. The initial point has always been only spirituality.

Only as a Spiritual Being, i.e. as a Soul, the human being has an identity. In the impossible but theoretical assumption of a material being without soul, the human being has no identity and no value at all.

The same is also valid for all nations: nations of millions or thousands of people. The numbers do not make any difference. Quality matters, not quantity. 

Without their cultural identity, without their spiritual integrity, without their traditional values, without their moral principles, without their conception of the universe and without their perception of their position and role in it, nations simply do not exist — and even worse, they do not need to exist, because without the above-mentioned qualifications, nations are useless. 

This is what the colonial powers (and the materialistic circles that control them from the backstage, i.e. the powers that be) attacked and tried to destroy in all colonized nations. 

Their method was simple, but it went unnoticed. It has not been detected by anyone until now: the colonial powers created fake identities for each subjugated, colonized nation, and they projected these fake identities onto these subjugated, colonized nations. Their local stooges carried out exactly this work. And the result was the complete deformation of the subjugated, colonized nations’ identities and their substitution by fake identities that only destroy those who accept them.

Who were the lucky ones in this calamitous process?

III. Are the Oromos less colonized than the ‘Egyptians’ and the ‘Greeks’? Yes! And that’s why!

The nations that have been so marginalized by the colonial agenda and because of the associated developments! These nations were not targeted directly by the colonial powers. I can give you some examples; nations like the Greeks, the Turks, the Turkmens, the Azeris, the Persians of Iran, the Aramaeans of Lebanon, Syria and Mesopotamia, the Copts (: the ‘Egyptians’, of Christian or Muslim faith), the Berbers of NW Africa, the Uzbeks, the Punjabis, the Bengalis, the Dravidians of the Deccan (so-called South India), the Somalis, the Chechens and the Tatars were directly targeted by the colonial powers.

Contrarily to the aforementioned nations, smaller or remoter nations like the Nubians, the Furis (Darfur), the Bejas, the Bertas, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Oromos, the Agaw, the Nuer, the Mahris of Eastern Hadhramaut, the Yazidis, and many others were not directly targeted by the colonial powers. These nations suffered only because of developments triggered by the colonial powers. That’s why they retained their culture, faith, identity and moral integrity.

Undoubtedly, these nations lived the process of extreme marginalization as a nightmare. But they cannot understand that they are indeed luckier than the non-marginalized nations, i.e. all those that became «sovereign» nations but with an altered and distorted identity. More specifically, the Oromos today are really luckier than the ‘Egyptians’ and the ‘Greeks’. Simply, the Oromos don’t know the reality, because they never studied the impact of Western colonization on the Eastern Romans (Romioi or Rumlar) or the Copts. If an Oromo studied in depth the colonization process in 19th and 20th c. ‘Egypt’ and ‘Greece’, he would understand this point easily.

Before 250 years, there was no such thing as a ‘Greek nation’; those who are called now ‘Greeks’ were then named Eastern Romans (Romioi or Rumlar), and this reflected their true, historical identity. In their Christian faith and traditions, the Eastern Romans detested the Ancient Greeks and considered them idolatrous, filthy and corrupt. At the time of Emperor Heraclius (7th c. CE), it was an insult to call an Eastern Roman … ‘Greek’! But due to the impact of Anglo-French colonization on the Eastern Romans, most of them now think that they are the descendants of the ancient Greeks. That’s a lie; ethnically they are Eastern Romans of Slavic, Albanian, and Vlach origin who were greatly amalgamated with Ancient Greeks, Ancient Romans, Illyrians, Ancient Macedonians, Lydians, Phrygians, Thracians, Lycians, Carians and Cappadocians.

In the early 19th c., the French and the English colonial diplomats bribed few selected Eastern Romans, who lived in Southern Balkans, promised them to help them become an independent state, and incited them against their own state (i.e. the Ottoman Empire); the event has been coined ‘Greek Revolution’ in the evil, colonial jargon, but in reality it was an infiltration / sedition operation like the ‘Arab Spring’. At the same time, the colonial powers imposed a pseudo-historical dogma on the Eastern Romans, who were convinced to rebel because they supposedly had glorious ancestors, namely the … Ancient Greeks! By means of colonial flattery and bribery, the 19th c. Eastern Romans accepted the colonial pseudo-historical dogma and diffused it nationwide in a most tyrannical manner.

Furthermore, the Eastern Romans were also mixed with Aramaeans from Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, with Turks, Turkmens, and Copts, with Berbers from Libya, Tunisia and Algeria, and also with Italians (Crusaders, Venetians, and Genoese). But following the monstrous colonial deformation that was imposed on the Eastern Romans, they disregarded their historical identity and imperial past (the Eastern Romans, headquartered at Constantinople, controlled all lands from Sicily to Armenia to Mesopotamia and from Ukraine to Tunisia to Sudan), they dishonored their Christian moral values, they abnegated their folklore and culture (their traditional attire included), and they became defaced monkeys of the West. Nowadays, as fake descendants of the Ancient Greeks, the Eastern Romans are called ‘Greeks’ and, as low-level slaves within the European Union, exist only to be the waiters of the Germans and the shoeshine boys of the Dutch. Isn’t it better to be an Oromo than a ‘Greek’ in 2021?

Similarly, the Copts were falsely baptized ‘Egyptians’ (which is an alien name) and they were totally disfigured, because of the French and English colonial practices that targeted their identity. Although the Ancient ‘Egyptian’ name for ‘Egypt’ is ‘Kemet’ (and therefore the ‘Egyptians’ must be called ‘Kemetians’) and the modern Christian Copts still use derivative forms of this name, while the modern Arabic-speaking Muslim Copts use the Arabic name Masr or Misir (which originates from the Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian name of Kemet/’Egypt’), the servile elites of the colonized country, totally subordinated to the disastrous orders of Paris, London, and Washington D.C., accept to dishonor their own History, tradition and languages, by using the fake, worthless and shameful name ‘Egypt’ at the international level. Isn’t it better to be an Oromo than an ‘Egyptian’ in 2021? Details:

Consequently, we can conclude that today both the ‘Egyptians’ and the ‘Greeks’ ended up functioning as non-nations, but as perfect tools of the colonial powers.

The Oromos are not like that; all of them still overwhelmingly reject the pejorative term ‘Galla’ that the 19th and 20th c. English and French colonials wanted to use this Abyssinian term, after the Abyssinian invasion of Biyya Oromo. The colonial establishments of US, England and France only recently started deploying efforts to diffuse their fallacies and pseudo-historical dogmas among the Oromos, in order to turn them into tools, but it is late.

IV. The Colonial Powers’ most Crucial Deeds still Unknown to most Colonized Nations – Independent or not

Still, most of the Oromos (and other nations worldwide) have no idea about either the real essence of colonialism or the true, deep damages that it caused to the colonized peoples; either we speak at the very general level, covering different continents and various nations, or we focus on the specific level, namely Egypt, very few people worldwide realize the extent of the calamity and the number of the ramifications caused by the colonial powers’ plans. More specifically, people don’t know and have not identified the various acts, deeds, practices and methods of the colonial powers that caused the aforementioned disaster worldwide. And I will expand on this in the forthcoming parts of my response.

One of the very few nations, which avoided the colonial experience, is Turkey; this is exclusively due to Kemal Ataturk, who early identified what really had happened to the Ottoman Empire and to other major Islamic empires, notably Safavid/Afshar /Qajar Iran and the Mughal state of Southern Asia. He also understood very well what a real nation is, what a fake nation is, and what factors determine a nation’s interests across lands, regions and continents. I expanded on this topic, stating that nations prosper and expand on lines determined by true History, and not as per the pseudo-historical dogmas and the nonsensical and absurd distortions undertaken by the colonial West.

A brief example of catastrophic colonial deeds that still remain unknown to most people worldwide, I offered in the Part IV (‘The Decline of the Islamic Empires and of China over the past four centuries’) of the following article of mine:

Read the three last pages, starting from the paragraph that begins with «The Dutch were present in Gujarat»! This part of text describes a critical colonial deed that the great emperors of the Oriental Empires failed to identify at the time (and for this reason they failed). Presently this deed is fully misinterpreted by the colonial academia; these scholars try to make it appear as an «innocent act of science and exploration», but in reality it was not. It is a monstrous theft.

There were similar deeds carried out by other colonial nations elsewhere; in the aforementioned article, I referred to the Dutch colonials in territories of the Mughal Empire, which now belong to ‘India’, namely the coast of Malabar. What was done by the French in Egypt at the time of Napoleon was far worse. I will discuss it in the last part of my present response.

At a certain point, you say something extremely important without realizing the tragic dimension of your words; speaking about Egypt and the Oromos you state: «we have mutual interests». 

This is all about the issue that we discuss. Who told you that someone without identity can possibly assess his (their) own interests? You assume a lot! Someone without identity, without a historically true identity, is nothing. In reality, he does not exist. This is obviously valid at both, the personal and the societal-national, levels. Irrespective of its nature, an entity with no identity has no value. It is nonexistent. This is what currently happens to the pseudo-state named «Arab Republic of Egypt»! What a pathetic pseudo-name!

First, the Copts of today’s ‘Egypt’, Christian or Muslim, are not Arabs. The so-called Egyptian elites pretend that they are ‘Arabs’, because this was the primary colonial order given by the colonial masters for no less than 223 years to their local stooges and puppets, who ruled Egypt according to the directives of the colonial powers.

Second and as I already said, the Ancient ‘Egyptians’ called their country «Kemet». 

And since the early Islamic times, the Muslim Copts have called their country «Masr». It is up to the indigenous people and their elites and rulers to defend their names. But the local elites and rulers failed the people of the Nile Valley.

What is then the useless pseudo-name «Egypt»? An alien name given to the country by foreigners! A true, original native from the Valley of the Nile, either Christian or Muslim, who –in contrast with the rest- would not have been drastically affected by a pathetic pro-Westernism (subtly diffused by colonial stooges and instructors among the Christian Copts as an anti-Islamic antidote) or a miserable Islamism (elaborated by colonial academia and projected onto the local, decayed and ignorant Muslims as an anti-colonial remedy), would denounce the deplorable name of ‘Egypt’ and demand from the United Nations to reject the disreputable use of the colonial, pseudo-historical name and to replace it by either Kemet or Masr.

The military governments of Myanmar respected their identity, integrity, tradition and faith and that’s why their diplomats were able to impose on the UN the final cancellation of the pseudo-name ‘Burma’ that the evil English colonials used to denote this great Buddhist country. But either the puppet khedives and kings or the silly colonels and generals, who have governed ‘Egypt’ since 1952, failed to reflect the slightest aspect of the local identity at the international level. All these worthless dictators from Mohamed Ali to Al Sissi failed to defend the country’s national identity and interests, as they implemented the colonial orders.

V. Biyya Oromo vs. ‘Galla Republic’ & Kemet vs. ‘Egypt’

Not one truly independent nation with dignity and self-respect would ever accept to be given by the international community an irrelevant, alien name that does not fit the local History, traditions, faiths and language(s). And consequently, no one respects a government that does not perceive correctly the national interests of the country and the nation that it rules.

Would you accept an Independent Biyya Oromo to be named ‘Galla Republic’?

Would the Iranians accept their country to be named ‘Persia’?

Would the Germans accept their country to be named ‘German-land’?

I add at the end some excerpts from an email recently sent to an Egyptian friend, which -I think- will offer you an insight into what you can and what you cannot, as Oromos, expect from Egypt.

However, I will soon come up with a truthful representation of the colonialism, as Crime against the Mankind, in its real dimensions that I think you never understood.

———— Parts of an email sent to an Egyptian friend (25/10/2020) —————  


Many times, I wrote to friends abroad about how the daily life in Egypt is — already in 2003 when I was working as Technical Writer and Editor for Giza Systems. After I started publishing online articles in 2004, many people from different continents asked me why I never wrote about these everyday realities of Egypt that no tourist has ever seen. I thought for some time about that (I mean for just some minutes).

My conclusion (which I announced to all those who suggested to me the aforementioned) was that

…… whereas Sudan’s regime tyrannized the Furis (in Darfur), the Beja, the Berta and others,

…….. whereas Abyssinia’s regime tyrannized the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Sidamas and many others,

…….. whereas Iran’s regime oppressed the South Azeris, the South Turkmens, the Loris, the Qashqais, and others,

and many other governments did the same to their country’s minorities,

in the unfortunate, colonized country of ‘Egypt’, the government did not literally oppress the people or the existing minorities (i.e. the Bejas of the southern parts of the Eastern Desert, the Nubians, the Christian Copts, the Berbers of the northeastern confines, the Bedouins of Sinai, the Shia Muslims, and the Bahais).

I always said that the problem in Egypt is not political but social. And this is the truth. It is a social tyranny that the people imposed on themselves. The elite and the government simply bring this tyranny (already applied by them on themselves) to the level of the local government.

There is no -properly speaking- oppression against the Beja of Halaib, the Nubians of Kalabsha, the Christian Copts of Luxor and other cities, the Berbers of Siwa and Salloum, and the rest. Don’t tell me about the ongoing persecution of the Christian Copts across the country! There is a vast difference between ‘inter-ethnic conflict’ (which exists in Egypt) and ‘governmental oppression’. To be frank, there was never governmental oppression against a minority in Egypt, at least since the time I first visited the country in the late 1980s.

Still, there is monumental oppression in Egypt – truly! But this is something very particular and, I must tell you, quite unusual for all the lands and countries that I know. As I already said, it is a social oppression with strange typology. In fact, it is a terrible form of massive popular self-oppression. Sunni Muslims in Egypt oppress themselves before oppressing the Christian Copts, the Shias, and the rest; so, what is there to discuss? A totally dysfunctional country, entrapped in all the colonial schemes, certainly oppresses all its inhabitants, the local elites included. This is the truth about your non-nation ‘Egypt’.

So, what you, as Egyptians, do not understand is that you do indeed oppress yourselves, and until one among you wakes up one morning, realizes that you all are plunged in a fake reality imposed on all of you by the colonial powers, and then tries to wake all the other Egyptians up, there is no point for anyone else to get involved or to describe in public your nauseating story of self-destruction. This has in fact been your country since the days of Napoleon: the corpse of a dead nation inside a terrible coffin. And if you want the correct description of your disastrous self-oppression’s main nature, here’s to you:

– You oppress indeed yourselves to be non-Kemetians (which is your true, not ‘Egyptians’), to disregard and dishonor your land, Kemet (this is your true name, not Egypt), to profane the Earth and the Nile that God gave you as blessings, which are incomparably superior to the unholy lands of Greece, Rome and Europe, and to subordinate your unfortunate land to repugnant, sacrilegious barbarians, namely the Americans, the English, the French, and all their stooges.

Then, why do you ask me to publish much and expand on Egypt? Do you want me to accuse the colonial powers for their lies and the falsehood that they imposed on Egypt and elsewhere? I did it on many occasions and in many articles; but to no avail! Not one Egyptian can understand these articles. 

The descriptions and the presentations of my articles are totally out of the Fake History and the fake world view that you have in your minds, because the colonial powers inserted them therein, and this process occurred in a dictatorial and very sophisticated manner (as they did it in many other countries) over a long period of time. This is nothing new however. The first Egyptian, who learned Egyptian hieroglyphics, managed to read your ancient texts no less than one century (: 100 years) after the French Champollion deciphered the writing. Like monstrous thieves and gangsters, the colonial academics and explorers have first stolen your past and then misinterpreted it as per their own vicious and evil needs, whereas you failed to identify even the process, let alone the myriad of detailed points involved therein.

Once, when we lived together back in 2002, you told me straightforwardly but thoughtlessly «you must hate Egypt very much» and I answered immediately «you, Egyptians, hate Egypt and that’s why you turned God’s blessed land to this filth that you are now». This summarizes it all. You even don’t know the history of your ancestors; you only know the distorted presentation that the Western colonials made of your Antiquity, because they wanted to falsify the Ancient Egyptian History, minimize the unequaled radiation of Kemet (which is your only true name of country), and present their own execrable barbarism as ‘independently grown civilization’ whereas Ancient Egyptians, Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians and Phoenicians civilized the barbarian Greeks, the Romans (who originated from Anatolia, today’s Turkey, so they are not truly Europeans), and the other White troglodytes of schizoid Europe.




Don’t you know that Theater was first performed in Egyptian and not among the uncivilized Ancient Greeks?

Don’t you know that in Egypt, Phoenicia, Mesopotamia, and Iran the Ancient Greeks learned the wisdom, the knowledge, the truth, and all the sciences of which they had no idea before?

Don’t you know that there is no such thing as “philosophy”?

This is an idiotic and worthless word coined by the Ancient Greeks who were low-level students of the Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, Iranian and Phoenician high priests, hierophants, mystics, and wise elders. Egypt, Phoenicia-Syria, Mesopotamia and Iran were the depository of the Mankind’s original Wisdom. Their epics are unequaled, their spiritual exercises and endeavors unmatched, their sciences unsurpassed, their medicine unparalleled, their writing systems incredibly more sophisticated, and their achievements simply impossible for the corrupt Ancient Greeks.

Mentally incapacitated, the profane Ancient Greek students of the Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, Phoenician and Iranian temples, when they returned back to their marginal and useless land, knew that they could never reproduce the mysteries and the divine deeds of their Oriental masters, because they did not have the Oriental Wisdom. That’s why they coined the pathetically low term ‘philo+sophia’, which denotes, not the Wisdom itself but, the search for it, namely a friendly predisposition toward the Oriental Wisdom. In other words, by being a ‘philosopher’, you confess your incapacity to become wise. This shows that the Ancient Greeks recognized and admitted their detrimental inferiority as regards the Ancient Oriental civilizations.

Don’t you know that the republican and democratic system of governance did not start in Ancient Greece but in Carthage (so, on African -not European- soil)? Also, don’t you know that Ancient Greek publicists like Aristotle, who wrote about the non-royal systems of governance, featured the Carthaginian system of politics and democracy and not the worthless corruption of the corrupt and racist Ancient Athenian?

So, as you see, although the Ancient Greeks wrote down the truth, Modern European criminals, either academics and intellectuals or military colonials and diplomats, monstrously distorted and partly concealed the historical sources and, starting with the inhuman Colonialism and Renaissance (15th and 16th c.), they carried out for no less than 500 years a worldwide unique campaign of historical censorship that is tantamount to unprecedented revisionism. This is the true face of colonialism; by learning the revisionist version of History that the English and the French imposed on their colonies, you fell victims and lost your true identity, as you started employing the fallacious and misleading terms of your colonial instructors and masters. 

In few days, I will terminate my new book «Turkey is Iran and Iran is Turkey»; this is at the same time a total rejection of the useless, fake Sunni establishment of Erdogan and of the worthless, fake Shia regime of the ayatullahs; both are the idiotic and pathetic puppets of the colonial powers. I will send you the draft.

When you will read it, and after making some comparisons with post-1798 Egypt, you will start imagining how I would describe Modern ‘Egypt’, namely a country stolen from its people and a people stolen from their land and taken into the total deception and the dystopia of national nonexistence.

As regards today’s ‘Egyptians’, I can make only one comment: you will never find the true Egypt (i.e. Kemet), before studying and in-depth understanding La Description de l’Égypte. 

This image may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by the Science History Institute of any product, service or activity, or to concur with an opinion or confirm the accuracy of any text appearing alongside or in logical association with the image. Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt. 1799 satirical artwork by William Baillie entitled ‘Seige de la Colonne de Pompee-Science in the Pillory’, showing Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt. Napoleon is depicted with a group of scientists on top of the Column of Pompey being attacked by Bedouins and Turks. A fire is burning at the base of the column, and men are hurtling to the ground when their balloon explodes.
Lejeune Louis FranÁois (1775-1848). Versailles, ch‚teaux de Versailles et de Trianon. MV6854.

When the French scholars, who traveled with Napoleon (1798), took their notes (which became later the monumental series of volumes published in Paris from 1809 until 1829), everything essential that existed in the Valley of the Nile was taken away for study, understanding and exploitation. The essence of your country was taken away. What you failed to study in order to empower yourself was already stolen by your enemies and invaders. The leftover (i.e. ‘you’) was insignificant; this is so because you did not possess the power to objectively study your environment, past and heritage to extract that the colonials did by exploring it. And this situation remained irreversible until now. You wanted it so — all of you. 

By taking the entire country away, the French did not improvise; they imitated the pioneering work of the Dutch scholars, who had published almost 150 earlier the equally important, groundbreaking, and local power-erasing Hortus Malabaricus. 

What Hortus Malabaricus (published in 1678) was for the Mughal Empire of South Asia (which was bigger than the Ottoman Empire), was La Description de l’Égypte for the Ottoman Empire: the announcement of their irrevocable End. 

And La Description de l’Égypte was far more critical, because it did not only cover the flora, but also the fauna, the people, and, above all, all the monuments and the inscriptions, the reliefs and the statues. 

What happened to the Dravidians of the Deccan (today’s southern half of India’s territory) with Hortus Malabaricus, occurred to the Egyptians with La Description de l’Égypte: they were left without country, without past, and without identity. 

The Dravidians would never control their land, namely the Deccan (the southern half of today’s pseudo-state «India») and the ‘Egyptians’ would never control Kemet, i.e. the Valley of the Nile. Both nations would never know their past, identity and origin, except someone, advancing through extremely thorny territory, would wake up and then attempt to wake up the rest.

And yet, the Dravidians originate from Ancient Mesopotamia where their ancestors, known as the Elamites, were the major opponent of the Sumerians, the Assyrians and the Babylonians for several millennia. Named as ‘Haltamti’ or as ‘Anshan and Sushan’ in their language and headquartered at Susa (the later Achaemenid Iranian capital, today in SW Iran), the Elamites developed their own, independent, writing system at the same time when the Sumerians invented their writing system (ca. 3300 BCE), namely some centuries before the Ancient Egyptians came up with the Medu Netcher, i.e. ‘the words of God’ (which is the Ancient Egyptian name of the Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing). Of course, none of these nations is ‘Indo-European’!,and%20their%20expression%20as%20words.

But the Indo-European colonial French, Dutch and English forgers and gangsters did not say to their colonial subjects, namely the Dravidians and the ‘Egyptians’, that when the colonized nations’ ancestors had already developed great civilizations, the ancestors of the Ancient Greeks and the other White Europeans were eating lichens somewhere in the plains of today’s Ukraine.


Download the text in Word doc:

Oromo Gadaa System, Ancient Carthage, and Western Fallacies, Revisionism & Evildoing: Renaissance, Enlightenment, Politics, Democracy and Colonialism

This article enables young Oromos to avoid the traps that the fake universities of the Western World have set in their Search for Truth; Democracy was not born in Europe (or ‘Greece’) but in Carthage, Africa.

And the colonization of Africa did not take place so that the Western colonial gangsters import goods from Africa, but mainly in order to export their evil and paranoid fallacies to Africa and thus contaminate all the civilized African nations with the dementia of Renaissance, the pestilence of Western Politics, the uselessness and inhumanity of the Western political theories and ideologies, and the putrefaction of their ‘democracy’, the world’s most evil and most tyrannical regime ever.

For readers with minimal exposure to the centuries long Gadaa system of Oromo societal organization, the following links consist in a brief introduction for them to start their own search:

What follows is the continuation with an excellent Oromo patriot and scholar.


Dear Shamsaddin,

Much of my adult life was spent far from the realm of History. But the unbreakable reality of my fellow countrymen, the Oromos, drew me to seek solace in reading History and trying hard to educate myself.

Indeed, I was among the Boraana Oromos, who are probably the last remaining segment of Oromo society that preserved the Gadaa tradition. I have read most of the contributions made by Asmarom Leggesse who wrote extensively on Gadaa. Do you know his ‘Gada: three approaches to the study of African society’?

Thank you for your expansive note that filled the gap in my knowledge of the very society I feel I belong to. Every time I come across such a wealth of knowledge, I can stop getting surprised and excited on equal measures. I am surprised by the level of my ignorance, and excited to know there is so much out there untapped resources to learn and educate myself.

I was introduced to your publications by the Sudanese scholar Y. F. (a specialist in Islamic Studies) and his son; I have been reading your articles ever since. I vow to read more and thus liberate my own mind from the childhood infection due to Abyssinian narratives and propaganda. There is nothing more fulfilling in life than liberating my mind from all sorts of ignorance; educating myself on the vast historical account of how we, the Oromos, fell prey for these psychopathic societies and got entangled with them is my top priority.

In the future, I intend to focus on the public health aspect of the colonial expansion in Oromia and work on this, thus producing useful resources to educate the next generations.

Asmarom published also a new book on the Oromos, expanding further and beyond previous publications, but I was unable to get a copy as yet. I am hoping to convert the Gadaa experience among Boraana Oromos into an educational cartoon to educate children. We must help young Oromos realize that Cushitic nations are not so ignorant of ‘democracy’, because their traditional systems of social organization enabled comprehensive participation all the people in the system of governance without the fake needs of representation and representativeness. So, it goes without saying that Oromos should not be preached at by men in grey suits who came with Bibles to only grab our land.

Best regards,

G. F.

——————- MY ANSWER —————————————-   

Dear G.,

Thank you for your numerous points and pieces of info that sufficiently reveal to me your background, occupation, endeavors and explorations!

Many of your sentences offer the chance of expanding much on crucial issues that you, Oromos (and others), face as a nation and which you will never overcome, unless you reject plenty of fallacies and deceptions, lies and forgeries that make up the quasi-totality of today’s world.

I. My Personal Stance toward the three Religions of the Oromos

In the past, I wrote much about how the Oromos can achieve national independence and what they have to do step by step to mark success in their effort. But then, it was 2007-2010 and everything was very different, because today’s world advances at high speed. I don’t regret for having published these articles (and that’s why you can find most of them in my academia account) and I don’t find any mistake in them, but they are truly not all-inclusive, if one wants to consider the matter in 2020. 

I have had several Boraana Oromo friends in Cairo, when I was living in Egypt, and I am convinced that, as you say, the Boraana have retained the most of the Oromo traditions, historical culture, moral values, and way of life. 

There is a point that I have always made clear to all my Oromo friends; my faith (as a Muslim) is my own personal concern; it does not have absolutely anything to do with my perception and evaluation of the world. I don’t see the world as a Muslim; I see the world through my own spiritual principles and moral standards, which are those that drove me to Islam (because I was born Christian Orthodox).

So, when it comes to Oromos, although I am a Muslim, I prefer Waaqeffannaa — not in terms of comparison but as consideration of what may be more suitable for whom. In fact, I view Waaqeffannaa as an early system of Islam, and according to the true teachings of Islam, the ‘true religion’, which is a mere ‘submission to Waaqo’, does not start with Prophet Muhammad but with Adam. On the other hand, as a historian and Egyptologist, I view Waaqeffannaa as the true survival of one of the Ancient Egyptian monotheistic religions, which existed also in Ancient Cush {: Ethiopia, i.e. Modern Sudan), as Kemet (Egypt) and Kas (Cush) had the same -many always (not one only)- religions}. About the situation in Ancient Egypt:

About Waaqeffannaa I wrote several articles, revealing some of its connections with Ancient Egyptian and Cushitic monotheistic principles and world conceptualization; unfortunately, until now I did not have the chance to re-upload them on academia. 

YABELO, ETHIOPIA – MARCH 07: Borana tribe virgin girls during the Gada system ceremony, Oromia, Yabelo, Ethiopia on March 7, 2017 in Yabelo, Ethiopia. (Photo by Eric Lafforgue/Art In All Of Us/Corbis via Getty Images)

II. Description of African Cultures in Western Colonial Universities 

Yes, thanks to my Boraana friends I came to hear and read texts by Prof. Asmarom Leggesse. 

However, here start all the problems. 

Not because of his description of the Gadaa system. This is correctly described in all its details and aspects.

The problem is not there.

Anyone can describe a topic to perfection, but still offer a catastrophic presentation as end result.


This issue is linked to some of your points; you say:

A. «the vast historical account of how we, the Oromos, fell prey for these psychopathic societies», and

B. «Cushitic nations are not so ignorant of ‘democracy’»

The problem that Prof. Leggesse, many other professors and scholars, and you too face is double. Before getting into it, I have to however state that I assume in this regard that all young African researchers and scholars are sincere and truthful and that none of them is biased enough to say what pleases the viciously indoctrinated, fallacious and distortive Western colonial pseudo-scholars. If a young African researcher’s target is only to get a position in a disreputable Western university, which is the epitome of forgery, racism and antihuman hatred, it is better that the young African stays at home, instead of becoming a fake scholar who betrays his nation, heritage, faith and conscience, thus becoming a liability for the entire continent’s anti-colonial struggle. The double problem that I mentioned hinges on two key words:

– Conceptualization 

– Contextualization

The first word means that you are able to see your topic originally, i.e. as a concept viewed in the same manner as it was conceived by its own constituent elements. 

It is not part or attitude of proper and truthful «scholarship» to see (and then describe) Gadaa in a way that today’s Americans or French can understand it. 

This is called fraud and distortion.

Every topic can only be evaluated on the basis of its own criteria.

So, Gadaa must be viewed as it was believed, practiced, respected and honored by the Oromo Elders before 400 or 200 years and only through their conceptualization of Universe and Life. 

This is the only unaltered value of Gadaa, and accordingly for every other topic of research.

There is not one modern value that exists as such, when a researcher examines a topic of Egyptian spirituality, Cushitic mysticism, Oromo societal organization, Somali Oral Literature, etc. The same is valid when it comes to the Sumerians, the Assyrians, the Hittites, the Babylonians, the Iranians, the Turanians, the Chinese and all the rest. 

You will never describe and represent the Gadaa system of traditional organization of the Oromo society truthfully if, while doing so, you don’t conceive the world in exactly the same manner as the paragons of the -true, historical, and enduringly practiced for centuries- Gadaa system.

The second word means that you are able to accurately place the topic within the historical frame in which it belongs, next to other contemporaneous systems, and adequately compare. You can never reveal the importance of a topic without comparing it to the existing comparable elements. 

III. Oromo Gadaa-based Culture: unrelated to the Renaissance, Western Politics and Democracy which consist in Crimes against the Mankind

To further advance, I must now present a third, also important, point: undoubtedly, ensuing consequence of the above mentioned is the fact that you cannot describe a topic with external, alien and even deprecatory terms. The only terms that are valid for Gadaa are Oromo terms. So, there is no Gadaa among Oromos if there is no Waaqeffannaa, and if there is no Waaqo. 

Consequently, you cannot defile the fair name of Gadaa by associating it with «democracy», because «democracy» is historically the world’s most barbaric, most corrupt, and most inhuman condition of the Mankind. Notice these two points:

1- the main colonial powers (France, England and America) were organized as ‘democracies’ and their rotten societies were institutionalized in ‘politics’;

2- without the Satanic system of ‘politics’ and the deriving ‘democracy’, Africa would have never been colonized;

3- ‘politics’ and the ‘democracy’ originated from the first stage of world colonization, i.e. the bloody Spanish and Portuguese conquest of the continent of Mayas, Aztecs and Incas, which must not be called anymore ‘America’; and

4- the first stage of world colonization was entirely due to the (then already propagated among Western Europeans) Renaissance, which is a deeply anti-Christian, anti-religious, anti-spiritual and anti-human dementia.

Renaissance is a fallacious, delusional, deceitful and devilish system geared to detach the Mankind from the real and natural world that was created by Waaqo for the humans and to lead the Mankind into abject barbarism and ultimate annihilation. To diffuse the paranoia of Renaissance, Spaniards and Portuguese massacred the Aztecs, the Incas, and so many other ancient and noble nations in the continent west of the Atlantic Ocean. This was the very first genocide committed in the History of the Mankind. Renaissance consists in the total defacement of humanity.

And to diffuse the paranoia of the ‘Enlightenment’, Politics, and Democracy, the English and the French massacred the African and the Asiatic nations that they colonized. As a matter of fact, if the Oromos and other African nations fell victims of the colonial powers and of their schemes in Africa, they have now to study in depth what colonialism truly means.

Colonialism means Renaissance, i.e. the most vicious distortion of the world civilization and the beginning of Revisionism, involving Reconquista and hatred of the ‘other’.





Colonialism means Enlightenment, i.e. the most insidious attempt to fool people and detach them from their spirituality, faith, moral traditions, and cultural heritage. 

Colonialism means Politics, i.e. a nefarious system of societal organization that allows treasonous secret societies with inhuman apocalyptic targets to hijack and gradually destroy entire nations.

Colonialism means fake ideologies and political philosophies diffusing evilness, deception, fraud and human exploitation. All Western political ideologies and so-called philosophical systems are vicious felonies, their descriptions fake, their contents unrealistic, their terms irrelevant, and their conclusions deliberately destructive, because their authors are all ignorant and paranoid, but perfectly marketed as ‘serious’ and even ‘wise’ by the evil secret societies where they belong.

Colonialism means Industrial Revolution, which was geared to detach humans from Nature, traditions, moral values, and faith. 

Colonialism means materialism, consumerism, agnosticism, atheism, abnormal morals and finally reduction of humans to cyborgs, i.e. destitute slaves of Artificial Intelligence.

Colonialism means fake science, distorted World History, nations disconnected from one another, impotent and mentally degraded humans fooled by high technology, criminally fraudulent and mendacious MSM, as well as idiotic Social Media.

Colonialism is NOT only the infamous «economic exploitation» of the colonized nations by the colonial powers, which is a much popularized topic. This fallacy is a smokescreen; economic exploitation happened indeed, but this issue is of minor importance. 

The destruction of the traditional national identity, cultural integrity, traditional moral, and world perception among all the colonized nations is the worst result of the colonization undertaken by France and England, Holland and Belgium, and other powers, notably America.

What most of the people worldwide fail to understand is that the diffusion of Marxism-Leninism is also a form of monstrous colonization; czarist Russia and other countries were colonized by Western Europeans via this scheme. To see the world face to face, one must admit that the USSR was a land colonized pretty much like Somalia, Algeria and Mozambique. The same is still valid for today’s China. It is an outfit of the colonial powers, as long as it does not return fully to its historical roots, cultural identity, moral integrity, and authentic spirituality, namely Confucianism-Taoism-Buddhism (the three main religions of China). 

IV. Civilized Oromo Gadaa-based Society vs. Unholy Democracy of the Ancient Greek Barbarians

In fact, modern Western European democracy is a monstrous invention that has nothing to do with historical democracy; it is geared to misrepresent all the people worldwide, to misinform them, to cheat them, and to lead them to total annihilation. 

Historical democracy is unknown to most people worldwide, as it terribly distorted by modern Western colonial historians, Hellenists, Latinists and Orientalists; it did not start in Greece but in Carthage, Africa. As major Phoenician colony established in 816 BCE, Qart Hadasht (as is the correct name of Carthage in Punic) was instituted as a democratic system more than 350 years before ‘democracy’ was attested among the barbarian atheists of Ancient Athens, which was a marginal, uncivil, uncivilized and disreputable village without even a proper sewerage system. About:

You certainly destroy Oromummaa, if you subordinate the civilized manner of Gadaa to the extensively misinterpreted, purposefully distorted, and undeservedly promoted (for the racist, white supremacist needs of the Western European colonial academia) «Athenian democracy», which was not even taken into consideration by Aristotle in his ‘Politics’ where he preferred to feature Carthage, Sparta and Crete:




Ancient Athens was one of the World History’s tyrannical and racist regimes; all the slaves had absolutely no rights. So, at least, 60-70% of the entire population (the slaves outnumbered the citizens) did not have ‘political rights’, let alone ‘human rights’. Contrarily to that evil system, Ancient Assyria, Babylonia, Egypt and Cush did NOT have slaves. Even worse, the women in Ancient Athens were viewed as mere animals, and did not have any place outside their houses. So, the filthy and racist regime of Ancient Athens was in fact the fake ‘democracy’ of 15-20% of the inhabitants. 

If therefore you truly need to denigrate your Gadaa with the Ancient Athens Sodomite pestilence called «Democracy», go ahead!

The colonial academia that has been the historical reason of the Oromos’ enslavement will surely laugh with your naivety.

This is the problem: if some Oromos intend to obtain a Ph.D. and a post-doctoral degree in Economics, Mathematics, Physics, Law, Medicine, etc., yes! I understand that they study in some advanced universities.

But advanced universities exist in Germany, Italy, Russia, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Malaysia, China, and Japan. 

Not in the Satanic states of France, England, US, Canada, Australia, Holland, Belgium etc.

You will never liberate Biyya Oromo, as long as you don’t understand that you cannot talk to those who reduced you to your present situation.

The only thing that an Oromo can do to an American, English or French is to keep him at a distance in order to avoid contamination.

So, to conclude about the future of Oromo studies and publications on the crucial and immense topic of the Gadaa system of social organization, I have to highlight the urgent need for many young Oromos to study Ancient Phoenician and Punic, Carthaginian History, History of Religion, and Archaeology, Ancient and Modern Berber language and culture, and subsequently undertake postgraduate, doctoral and post-doctoral studies with focus on the comparison between the Gadaa system and the Shophet of Ancient Carthage.

V. Gadaa: an Absolute Rejection of the Western Colonial World and a Major Threat for the Colonial Powers

Going beyond the topic of Gadaa system and its description, I must point out that the entire Oromo Diaspora in all these countries must abandon them immediately; either move elsewhere or return to Biyya Oromo! Oromo life is not measured with money. This was not the criterion for Abba Jifar II of Jimma, your last King!

Iran is better than England, Turkey is better than America, and Pakistan is better than France. No Turk, no Iranian, no Pakistani ever came to colonize you. And the same is valid for all the other countries that I already mentioned.

Living in America, England and France, an Oromo gets corrupted, falls in love with the evil, consumerist lifestyle of these cursed countries, and thus becomes genuinely unable to fight. He is then not an Oromo, but an Afaan Oromoo-speaking slave of the West — and he even does not understand it.  

There is a fourth, even worse, point; any dissertation, essay or treatise about an Oromo (or any other cultural, historical) topic must use internal, inherent and local-value-revelatory terms. If an Oromo-related topic is not presented in a way that fully reveals its nature, its relation with other expressions of the Oromo daily life, and its dependence on Oromo spirituality, then this is a dead and useless text.

If a treatise about the Gadaa system does not include anything about the total dependence of the Oromo social organization on the Oromo religion and spirituality and does not reveal the feeling of permanent holiness in which your ancestors lived, then there is no need to write it. Depriving the social life of the Oromos from the sense of spirituality (which permeated it) is tantamount to deprecation and defamation. 

Really, I am not quite sure that Prof. Leggesse understood correctly what he was doing. Of course, I don’t question his keen interest to make known part of his national heritage to the rest of the world and his ability to describe the topic like very few other scholars worldwide. But this is not enough. In fact, he seems to have been deceived by his colonial instructors in the way he presented his topic. 

You cannot present an Oromo topic authentically and at the same time please the non-values of the criminal Western pseudo-universities. The words «religion» and «spirituality» do not appear even in the Table of Contents. The presentation of the Oromo heritage and culture can be done only within Oromo clothes; dressing Oromo culture in materialistic Western clothes and blue jeans is tantamount to sacrilege. I wonder how one can write a book about Gadaa without an entire chapter like «Waaqeffannaa & Gadaa». 

Last, one Oromo, writing -in the Hell of Satanic West- about his own historical-cultural heritage, must make clear what exists and what does not exist within a Gadaa-based societal organization. For instance, one should state that 

– within the Oromo society there are not secretive organizations;

– hierarchy is basically a matter of age (and not initiation into evil mystical rites among secluded organizations of gangsters who ceaselessly conspire the rest of the society); and

– there is not a chance of some people to prosper in Biyya Oromo, while others suffer, let alone are exploited by the «lucky few».

Gadaa system is the absolute rejection of organizations like the Jesuits, the Zionists and the Freemasons in the decadent West. In other words, not only the present elements matter, reflect a societal system’s value, and must therefore be properly described, but also the absent elements have to be mentioned. Absence of evil is what matters most in this world; consequently, this point has to be extremely stressed in the description of the Gadaa system.

But I guess that, if an Oromo writes something like that, he will be considered as worthless and even dangerous by the corrupt Western pseudo-academics, bogus-professors, and fake intellectuals, who dictatorially control the pseudo-universities of the West’s criminal, «democratic» tyrannies. 

In other words, every truthful description of the Oromo Gadaa system, when published in a Western country, must be turned into a formidable weapon and into an absolute rejection of the Western colonial world and of its corrupt dependencies, namely modern politics, republics, democracies and useless ideologies.

In and by itself, it is a declaration of war against the colonial West, because in fact the Gadaa system was the main reason for which the English and French colonials wanted the Amhara barbarians to invade the Oromo Kingdoms in the second half of the 19th c. and in the first half of the 20th c. and to subsequently destroy the Oromos’ cultural traditions, societal organization, and historical identity. The colonial powers had already got early insightful descriptions of the Oromo societal structure and their regimes immediately perceived it as major threat.

VI. Oromo Moral Values: targeted by the Colonial Western Regimes 

I selected two brief excerpts from your email, namely A and B, and I already answered point B (as per above Unit II). 

In excerpt A you wonder: «how us Oromos fall prey for».

Answering your question is a very brief affair. 

First, you were not alone. Most of the colonized nations, empires and communities fell prey.

Second, this is the force of the deception. They still want to talk you into their evil hypocrisies! Many among you inanely get flattered whenever a criminal, who happens to be an American ambassador, wants to speak to them. Unfortunately, in this manner, these Oromos (or nationals of other oppressed nations) easily destroy themselves by conversing with these inhuman beasts whose faces appear to be friendly and smiley, whereas their duplicitous words are said only in order to cheat their interlocutors and drive them to destruction and extinction.

No one among you understands that, if you make a list of things considered «correct» by an American ambassador today (such as abortion, extra-/pre-marital relations, lesbianism, adoption of children by abnormal and unnatural sodomites, etc.) and you examine what would have happened, if you had presented that list to Abba Jifar II of Jimma, you will see finally the truth. The last Oromo King would have ordered all the Oromos to abstain from any type of contact or conversation with those beasts.

This is the only way to liberate Biyya Oromo: Abba Jifar II of Jimma is the only criterion.

Third, it is of course bad that you were cheated and fell prey, but this fact is also a positive element and indicator. It shows the goodness and the innocence of the Oromos of those days. Our lives in this world are a brief passage; the eternal, spiritual world is what truly matters. 

However, the third point reveals the only context within which you must see and place, describe and propagate your struggle toward

a) the Liberation of Biyya Oromo from the Amhara-Tigray pestilence and monstrosity, and

b) the Rejection of the Anglo-French and American colonial plan for Biyya Oromo: it is Major Battle between Good and Evil. Nothing less than that!

Thank you for the details that you provide me with as regards your first information about my publications! I don’t know Prof. Y. F., although I lived in Sudan and also traveled extensively across the immense country. But I think that I have heard his name (and positive comments) from an Egyptian friend, who also was there several times, but separately from me. 

I also published much about Sudan (books, articles, seminars, speeches, and online publications), but again I did not have the time to re-upload all the material. 

However, I re-uploaded more than 10 articles in which I present the Cushitic roots of the Oromos, stressing their links with today’s Arabic-speaking Sudanese. More importantly, I repeatedly denounced the subtle colonial effort of Sudan’s Nubianization.

This is very critical for the Oromos. Sudan is Cush, and all the monuments, which have been excavated there, are Cushitic (so Ancient Ethiopian, i.e. unrelated to Abyssinia) and not Nubian. Nubians are a Nilo-Saharan nation, and Nilo-Saharan languages are totally unrelated to the Hamitic and Cushitic languages, like Afaan Oromo, Af Somali, Qafaraf, Sidamuaffo (and other Eastern Cushitic languages), Berber languages, Hausa, Fulani, etc. (modern Hamitic languages), and also Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Meroitic.

There is no such land as Nubia; that’s a colonial fabrication. Although Nubia never existed either as a historical state or a geographical term, Nubians exist as a separate, Nilo-Saharan, historical nation that lived historically in both, Kemet (Egypt) and Cush (Ethiopia: Sudan). But Nubians are ethnically-linguistically unrelated to both, the Egyptians and the Cushites.

Culturally, Nubians were always assimilated to both, the Egyptians and the Cushites, having indeed minor differentiations, although undoubtedly they had a distinct language. But with the exception of the Christian Kingdom of Nobatia, Nubians never ruled a separate kingdom. So, it is impermissible to call the Ancient Egyptian and the Ancient Cushitic / Meroitic antiquities, sites, monuments, temples, fortresses, tombs, etc. of Upper (Southern) Egypt and Northern Sudan “Nubian monuments”. This attitude reveals secret Freemasonic-Zionist plans providing for the formation of an independent Nubian state, which is scheduled to comprise of large swaths of Egyptian and Sudanese territory.

I take the opportunity to also convey to you my very best wishes for a happy new year 2021, full of health, advance in your projects, creativity and prosperity! 

Best regards,



Download the article in Word doc:

Oromo History and African Christianity: Nobatia, Makuria and Alodia (the Cushitic Christian Kingdoms of Ethiopia in Sudan), Axum, Agaw, and Pseudo-Solomonic Abyssinia

This article is mainly written as an introductory information for every Oromo, Afar, Sidama, Ogadeni, Hadiya, Berta, Agaw, Anuak, Nuer, Kaffa, Kmabata, Shekacho, Gedeo and other Eastern African whose nation has been subjugated, persecuted and oppressed within the tyrannical colonial state of Amhara & Tigray-led Abyssinia (i.e. Fake Ethiopia). Abyssinia has no historical right to the fair name of Ethiopia which is the term by which Ancient Greeks and Romans denoted the kingdom and the nation immediately south of the Egyptian border, i.e. Cush (today’s Sudan). Many among the aforementioned oppressed nations of Abyssinia are of Cushitic ancestry and originate from the northern part of today’s Sudan.

What follows is not a proper and concise historical presentation; it is only my recent exchange of messages and emails with an Oromo scholar, who happens to be a faithful Waaqeffatta, i.e. one of the followers of Waaqeffannaa, which has been the traditional monotheistic religion of the Oromos, Eastern Africa’s greatest and most ancient Cushitic nation. As he asked me few points about the diffusion and the survival of Christianity in Eastern Africa, I felt obliged to prepare a brief diagram and add a few links for any Oromo to make his own search. All Oromos must learn about the History of Christianity in Egypt, Sudan (i.e. the only true, historical Ethiopia), and Axumite Abyssinia, so that they don’t fall victims of colonial forgeries diffused by the French, the English and the Americans or of pseudo-historical narratives of the ominous Abyssinian debteras.  

Whereas there was Christian continuity in Sudan (Ethiopia) until the end of the 15th and the beginning of the 16th, there was Christian disruption and discontinuity in Abyssinia. Axum collapsed in the 7th c. due to the early Islamic expansion. Agaw Christianity is Cushitic, brief, and totally unrelated to Axum, as the Agaw kingdom rose to power no less than 500 years after the dismantlement of Axum. And the rise of the Amhara pseudo-Christian bogus-kingdom (in the 2nd half of the 13th c.) does not consist in continuity but complete disruption from the Agaw dynasty. Based on a forged trash named ‘Kebra Negast’, the Amhara pseudo-kingdom represents the most ludicrous invention of the World History: the fabrication of the otherwise nonexistent ‘Solomonic’ dynasty. In other words, Axum has nothing to do with Lalibela, Lalibela has nothing to do with Gondar, and Gondar is not Christian, but Satanic.   


Dear Prof. Shamsaddin,

I admire your academic rigor in dispelling the Abyssinian and Ethiopian myth, and describing the Oromos in their true demographic and cultural context, one of the few or the only scholar to do justice for the Oromo case.

G. F.


Dear G.,
Thank you very much for your kind words and message!
I don’t know what articles of mine you read here except for the one that you currently downloaded.

I published extensively about Ancient History of Egypt, Sudan (: Ethiopia/Kush), Abyssinia, Somalia and also North-Northwestern Africa – in many languages.
About Biyya Oromo, the Oromos and Christian-Islamic and Modern History of Africa, I published hundreds of online articles during the period 2004-2012 (in three different portals). Many of those articles were reproduced in Oromo and other portals, blogs and fora. The three portals closed down for one reason or another in the period 2014-2016, and consequently only my republished articles remained available online. Thank God, I had kept copies of all of them, and I started my account here in 2016, having as main target to re-upload all of my online articles (ca. 1800 until 2012) here. Unfortunately, I progressed slowly over the past years, due to new projects, and until now I re-published only ca. 300-350 (of my 1800 online articles of the period 2004-2012). However, I am persistent and I will try to re-upload more in the years to come.

Meanwhile, I have also almost ready new articles to publish about various topics, Oromos and Biyya Oromo included. Many Oromos and others write to me, asking me interesting topics, and sometimes my responses are very long and fit to publish. So, when I have time, I edit them for clarity and upload them. I recently (October) had a long conversation with a US-based Oromo who asked me about the chances of Oromos cooperating with Egypt (a country that I know very well for having lived and worked for 20 years).

To explain what the fake state of Modern Egypt is, I needed many thousands of words and soon this exchange of emails will become one article (or a series of articles). Of course, I know that you must not expect any substantive help from Egypt, but my response to that of your compatriots will take you by surprise because in it I explain also why I believe that it is still better to be an Oromo in Occupied Biyya Oromo than an Egyptian in the so-called ‘independent’ Egypt where the colonization simply took another, worse form.

You can contact me here:

I also believe that the Oromo Diaspora constitutes a major threat for Biyya Oromo’s national independence. The reason for this is that Oromos (and others) generate terrible delusions in their minds, create fake dreams that lead to nowhere, trust their Western interlocutors (who all say lies to Oromos and others), and end up becoming tools of the criminal Western countries against Biyya Oromo’s without even understanding it.

Oppression in Abyssinia (and Occupied Biyya Oromo) is less evil than oppression in US, UK, EU, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Western World in general.

In Abyssinia you only risk to lose your body. In the West, you inevitably lose your soul. This is the worst death of all!
Many thanks


Thank you Prof for raising the delusion of many Diaspora Oromo’s . I was also shocked by the scale of delusion about Ethiopianism among Orthodox Christian practicing Oromos when I went home in 2019 after three decades. 

The Orthodox Church has been the caretaker of all the evils perpetrated by Abyssinian elite. Being Orthodox is synonymous to being Abyssinian and renouncing your Oromo identity (name, language, religion, values) and even name of the land.

European scholars are always keen to support Christians and minority as gate way to keep their colonial boundaries intact. Most of the deluded Oromo’s weather in diaspora or back home fall for the fake stories and fall pray for such nonsense. 

We are trying hard to decipher the myth of Ethiopian and false legendary ties to the Kingdom of Judea. Menelik is a slave and who eventually end up owning 70,000 slaves. But European elevated him to king and wrote stories for illiterate through the blessing of Orthodox Church to believe he is God anointed.

The TPLF also injected another virus into the Oromo youth called Pentecostal church, This is the virus and whoever catch it will feel immune from the trial and tribulation of Oromo’s sadly denouncing they are not concerned about this life, what a perverse way to look and live. This virus cost millions to lose life and hope and focus hence didn’t help the struggle.

We are working on multiple fronts. As for Egypt, I don’t -for an iota of a second- believe they would ever be an alliance to anyone. They failed Palestinians and why should I believe they would be alliance to Oromo, I am too old to believe in this sort of conundrum, 

We are organizing conference in February; it would be good if you could present even paper via remote.

G. F.

————— MY RESPONSE TO THE EMAIL ———————-  

Dear G.,

Thank you for the important points that you raise here!

They are truly crucial not only for the Oromos, but the entire African continent and the Mankind! You can call me Shamsaddin!

Please let me know more about you, your age, origin (Arsi, Borana, Wollega, etc.), town/city of birth, and place(s) of study! I did not find any CV in your profile; that’s why I am asking you all these points, so that I better picture your background.

I guess you are living in … now; correct me if I am wrong!

I wrote much about the Oromos, Ancient Cush and N-NE Africa, Ogadenis, Somalia, and Abyssinia, but -as you can understand- there is always a moment, when you realize that «much» is still «little» or sometimes «next to nothing». And this is what you made me feel with what you write here. Thank you!

Christological divisions in Africa – Egypt, Sudan (: Ethiopia), and Abyssinia

Christianity in Eastern Africa south of Egypt is an enormous issue – very complex, very concealed, and very useful to colonial France, England, US, the Vatican and the Protestants, when it is worldwide unknown or diffused in a wrong and confusing manner.

The complexity already starts in Egypt. You call the Abyssinian Church «Orthodox»; and so is also called the Coptic Patriarchate of Alexandria. 

But do you know that the Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople (and consequently that of Moscow) does not recognize the Copts as ‘Orthodox’, but as «Monophysitic» (the currently prevailing term is «Miaphysitic», which is fairer, taking into consideration the fact that in its origin the term «Monophysitic», coined by the Constantinopolitan Patriarchate, was very pejorative)?

Aramaeans of Syria, SE Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan and Copts of Egypt from one side and from the other side Romans and Constantinopolitan bishops were mutually excommunicated and did not accept one another as «Christian». The Axumite Abyssinians however followed the Copts. 

This issue is a vast topic that exploded in the 5th c. (so before more than 1500 years) under the form of Christological disputes. It hinged on major events of the Christian Church, namely the Council of Ephesus (449 CE) and the Council of Chalcedon (451 CE). In the former, Nestorius and his followers were condemned (Nestorianism). In the latter, the Monophysites were condemned (Monophysitism was viewed as heresy) by the Constantinopolitan and Roman stooges, who were for them heretics as Dyophysites (Dyophysitism being the belief that Jesus had two natures, namely human and divine). General info about the Monophysites you can find here:

And the following links are about the Nestorians:

Attention: the «Oriental Orthodox Churches», which are the Monophysitic churches (so, not the Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople), have nothing to do with the «Church of the East», which encompasses the Nestorians (Aramaeans and other followers of Nestorian Christianity in Iran, Yemen, Central Asia, India and China). 

These terrible divisions cost the Eastern Roman Empire half of its territory, which was lost to the early armies of Islam. The reason is simple: Aramaean and Egyptian Monophysites and Aramaean and other Nestorians were oppressed by the Eastern Roman soldiers and governors, because of their religious rejection of the capital (Constantinople) city’s clergy and theologians. They were penalized with heavy taxes; that’s why they preferred to be ruled by Muslims and thus be free from the Constantinopolitan Orthodox Patriarchate’s armies that they considered heretic, identifying themselves as Orthodox Christians.

The Coptic Chronicles (a valuable historical source) describe in great words the Caliphs, whereas they curse the Eastern Roman Emperors who imposed the Constantinopolitan theology on them. I am referring mainly to two chronicles, namely John of Nikiû’s Chronicle and Severus of Al’Ashmunein (=Hermopolis) and his History of the Patriarchs of the Coptic church of Alexandria (Ta’rikh Batarikat al-Kanisah al-Misriyah). More:

Severus (known in Arabic as Sawiris ibn al Maqaffa) narrates also the miraculous levitation of the mountain al Muqattam (east of Islamic Cairo) that was performed by St. Simon the Tanner (Sam’ān al-Kharrāz/ سمعان الخراز) in 975, during the reign of the Fatimid Caliph Al-Muizz.

The Christian Cushitic Kingdoms of Eastern Africa south of Roman Egypt: Nobatia, Makuria and Alodia in Sudan (: Ethiopia) opposite Axumite Abyssinia 

Around the middle of the 5th c. another serious development took place and it highlighted this theological division in Christian Cush (Ancient Ethiopia, i.e. today’s Sudan). After the collapse of Meroe and the depopulation that characterized the period 370-450 CE across Cush, three independent Christian kingdoms emerged in the territory of today’s Sudan:

1- Nobatia: with capital at Faras, presently under the waters of the Nubian Lake, close to the borderline between Egypt and Sudan,

2- Makuria: with capital at Dongola Agouza, ca. 550 km south of the Egyptian-Sudanese border alongside the Nile.

3- Alodia: with capital at Soba, 30 km east-southeast of Khartoum.

These kingdoms followed different Christian patriarchates: 

Nobatia (the only Nubian state in the History of the Mankind) accepted the authority of the Coptic (self-styled «Orthodox», called «Monophysitic» by Constantinople and Rome) Patriarchate of Alexandria. Coptic was the official religious and state language of Nobatia.

In contrast with Nobatia, Makuria accepted the religious authority of the Eastern Roman (self-styled «Orthodox», called «heretic» by the Copts) Patriarchate of Alexandria. Alexandrian Koine (i.e. Biblical Greek) was the religious language of Makuria. Makurian (written in Greek characters) was the official language of the kingdom. Makurian writing is not yet fully deciphered (due to the scarcity of the preserved documentation), but it appears to be the Christian language of the Meroitic Cushites who remained in their land, after the Axumite invasion of Meroe by Ezana of Axum (370 CE). Consequently, it must have (like Ancient Meroitic) linguistic affinities with Afaan Oromoo.

Alodia, like Nobatia, was linked to the Coptic Patriarchate. About:

The above three Christian Kingdoms constituted the true, Christian Ethiopia.



Fresco from the former Faras Cathedral in Nubia. Collection of the National Museum of Sudan.


Christian Abyssinia is Axum, as you know. They were more linked to Yemen than to the Other Berberia and Azania (Somalia) and the three Christian Sudanese / Ethiopian kingdoms.

With the arrival of Islam, Axum collapsed. This was due to the fact that the entire East African coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa region were occupied by the Islamic Caliphate; this development occurred because Eastern Roman rule in Egypt disappeared and the Yemenites, who were the greatest seafarers of the southern seas, accepted Islam and became part of the Islamic Caliphate. Axumite Abyssinia’s trade and royal wealth had depended mainly on the Red Sea trade; being cut off Adulis (not far from today’s Massawa), its main trade center and port of call, Axum was left in the inland with no income.

Contrarily to Axumite Abyssinia, Nobatia’s, Makuria’s, and Alodia‘s trade hinged mainly on Egypt, Sahara, Central and West Africa; that’s why contrarily to Axumite Abyssinia, Nobatia, Makuria, and Alodia continued to exist for several centuries.

Nobatia merged with Makuria in the 8th c., after having successfully stopped the advance of the Islamic armies in the North of Egypt. For more than 250 years, the Islamic Caliphate controlled in Egypt only the following regions: the Red Sea coast, the Mediterranean coast, the Delta, and the northern end of the valley of the Nile for ca. 300 km south of Cairo.

Very few people know today that, when Spain, Senegal, Sicily, Samarqand, Central Asia and the NW confines of today’s India were parts of the Islamic world (in let’s say ca. 800 or 850 CE), the ancient great capital of Egypt at today’s Luxor was a great Christian monastic center and belonged to the merged Kingdom of Nobatia and Makuria.

Makuria remained an independent Christian kingdom until ca. the middle of the 14th c. The Islamization of Cush proved to be difficult and lasted some time, because after the collapse of the capital of Makuria, Dongola Agouza, descendants of the Nobatian and Makurian nobles shaped new Christian kingdoms in various locations alongside the Nile, and escaped the Islamic rule for decades. Only around the end of the 15th c. the old territory of Makuria was exclusively and irreversibly under Islamic control.

Last, Alodia continued existing until the early 16th c. when it collapsed because of the expansion of the Muslim Funj. Also:







Christian Discontinuity and Disruption in Abyssinia: the Fallacy of the ‘Solomonic’ dynasty    

Contrarily to the Christian continuity in Sudan (Ethiopia/Cush), there is Christian discontinuity in Abyssinia.

Axum Abyssinia disintegrated in the first decades of the Islamic Caliphate (ca. 650) having lost its coast, revenue, and reason to exist. Certainly, small Christian communities survived in the inland, but we have no contemporaneous historical sources and all foreign references, mainly Coptic, are minimal too. There was no substantial central authority there.

The so-called Semien kingdom is a delusional tradition that is not reconfirmed by any solid historical or archaeological evidence; it therefore consists in a modern propagandistic reconstruction whereby every bribed author can add whatever he likes — or if you want the story of his grandmother!

The Christian Agaw kingdom (the Zagwe dynasty) rose in the middle of the 12th c. (ca. 1150). This means 500 years after the collapse of Axum. There is no continuity or relationship at all. This kingdom had nothing to do with Ethiopia (Sudan) and it was also unrelated to the various, disparate Axumite Abyssinian remnants. Extremely few sources have been left from that period, and only few historical points can be truthfully crosschecked. At the end, even Mararah and Takla Haymanot may be two different persons, one historical and the other forged later and projected onto the historical one. The Amhara hatred against the Christian Agaw was enormous; this means that the Amhara distortion of Agaw History must have been extensive and very deleterious.

There is no Solomonic dynasty. Kebra Negast is a forged document prepared on the basis of instructions given by some Talmudist Jews and first written in Arabic. Like many others, I reject the Coptic hypothesis. It was translated from Arabic to Ge’ez prior to the rise of Yekuno Amlak. It was the reason for it. Kebra Negast is a viciously Anti-Christian propagandist text written only to serve Talmudist eschatological targets. The original composition must be placed within the entire context of the Crusaders’ decline in the Orient, and certainly after the Conquest of Jerusalem by Saladin (1187). It reached the hands of the Amhara debteras, who hated the Agaw priests and monks, and wanted to destroy Cushitic Christianity in order to replace it by their pseudo-religion and barbarism. The entire plot of Kebra Negast is un-Biblical and un-Christian. It is a distortion that suits an eschatological agenda.

Dynasty means noble family. The fake Solomonic dynasty has no earlier noble ancestry, and does not constitute any royal family. There is no royalty and nobility among Amharas; this is due to the fact that the Amharas do not have «family» properly speaking. What the Amharas call «family» is not a Christian rite. The fake ‘kings’ of the Amharas were petty peddlers and monstrous criminals. Linked to this forged dynasty (which was protected and saved by early 16th c. Portuguese) is the fallacy of the Ark of Covenant.

The area of Axum, as you know, was for many centuries part of the Ottoman eyalet of Habesh (the province of Ottoman Abyssinia). This province was much larger than the tiny Amhara kingdom. Why is there not a single reference to the issue of the Ark of Covenant, as supposedly located in Axum, in any Ottoman document or text (official or not), since this religious object is also considered holy by the Muslims? Clearly, because there was no such object in that location! This concludes the case for the pseudo-ark of covenant that is said to be there; there are references to it only after the formation of the colonial state of Abyssinia, starting with the pseudo-Menelik II bogus-king of the Amharas. It is a fake. and

Indication of the Anti-Christian nature of the Amhara and their debteras is also the high number of Catholic monks whom they killed during the centuries. For many centuries, Islamic lands were safer for Catholic priests and monks to travel than the pseudo-kingdom of the bogus-Solomonic dynasty. And this is extensively published. 

Contrarily to what you say, the colonial expansion of the tiny state of Amhara Abyssinia was prepared long before pseudo-Menelik II was born. The critical fact was the notorious travel of James 1770.

He prepared the foundations of everything that followed. It was a major colonial achievement.

He arrived in Abyssinia almost 30 years before Napoleon arrived in Alexandria. Of course, Bruce did not have an army, but important things can also be prepared without armies sometimes.

It was the stupidity of the Ottomans to allow Westerners to circulate free across their own empire — as if it were possible for Westerners to think positively for anything or anyone in this world!

Yes, I know about the Pentecostals and their heresy. Those who have money try to be everywhere.

However, I am glad you don’t have illusions about the «broken reed of Egypt»!!!!

Prophet Isaiah -before more than 2700 years- said:

« Lo, thou hast trusted on the staff of this broken reed — on Egypt — which a man leaneth on, and it hath gone into his hand, and pierced it — so is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all those trusting on him.» (Isaiah 36:6)

Thank you for your invitation that I accept!

Best regards,



Download the text in Word doc:

The Fabrication of the Fake Greek History, the Nonexistent Fallacy of Hellenism, the 19th c. ailing Ottoman Empire, and today’s Turkey

What follows is my response to a Turkish friend, who -a while back- wrote a separate email to ask me whether I knew a French book written by an anonymous author and published in the 19th c., about a nation that never existed: the Greeks. The book was published (in 1870) in order to circulate among representatives of the 19th c. French colonial establishment and thus ‘educate’ the various tenants of that state about the French state’s doctrine about the topic.

In and by itself, this book proves that the colonial historiography is a fallacy engineered by bogus-scholars, who acted like agents of falsehood and state functionaries, promoting all deceptions and forgeries needed for the criminal policy of their state.

The colonial needs of France and England imposed the creation of a racist, anti-Ottoman, anti-Turanian, and anti-Islamic state located at the southern end of the Balkan Peninsula that they would utilize every now according to the anti-Ottoman targets of Paris and London. The local inhabitants were not ‘Greek’, and had no relation with the various ancient tribes of South Balkans, which were collectively called by many different names (one of which was ‘Greeks’).

Unrelated to the indigenous Ancient Pelasgians, peripheral to the Ancient Macedonians, Illyrians, Thracians, Phrygians, Lydians, Carians and Lycians, the so-called Ancient Greek tribes killed one another mercilessly and to the last, until they gradually vanished from History, without leaving any other memory than ceaseless bloodshed, pseudo-religious fornication, pseudo-theoretical nonsense called ‘Philosophy’, and lawless dissident states whereby the ignorant, immoral and pathetic magistrates did not want divine rule over them. All factors of some value that have been found among them were the lowest elements of Oriental civilizations diffused across the South Balkans throughout the millennia.

Theater is a religious representation invented in Ancient Egypt; as such it was incomprehensible to the spiritually impotent and culturally defective Athenians. Consequently, the Ancient Egyptian Theater was degraded by the Athenian fools into farcical and spiritually nonsensical plays deprived of anything divine and transcendental.  

Philosophy was not a target for the Ancient Ionians; instead, Wisdom (‘Sophia’) was. However, Wisdom and Spirituality were the privilege of the Assyrians, the Hittites, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, and the Iranians. Since the Ancient Ionians were the low level students of the Mesopotamian, Anatolian and Egyptian high priests and spiritual masters, they could not achieve ‘wisdom’ and they were therefore satisfied to limit themselves to the mere search of wisdom, which is exactly what ‘philosophy’ means. In fact, in the Ancient Greek dialects, ‘philosophia’ is a clearly derogatory term. Opposite to ‘sophia’, ‘philosophia’ sounds like ‘monkey’ opposite to ‘human’.

Democracy existed in Carthage since the very moment of the foundation of the colony of the Phoenician kingdom of Tyre in Africa; in Athens and elsewhere in South Balkans, Phoenician colons diffused this system of governance. The Ancient Macedonian (i.e. non-Greek) philosopher Aristotle described in detail the republican-democratic system of the Carthaginians (Politics, book 2: 11), but due to the revival of Roman Anti-Semitism in Modern Times, this historical truth is concealed by the French academia. But Aristotle did not say a word about the barbarian contamination of Ancient Athens…

After the French academia fabricated the nonexistent ancient nation of ‘Greeks’, they wanted to prolong its existence down to the Christian-Muslim times. However, the survivors of the Ancient Ionians intermingled with many Anatolian, Balkan and other nations, notably the Romans, and accepted Roman political ideology, becoming ‘Roman citizens’ thanks to the Constitutio Antoniniana (the famous Edict of Caracalla, 212 CE). After they accepted Christianity, they dissociated themselves from the Ancient Greeks, who were viewed as the world’s most barbaric abomination. Even more significantly, the Ionians of the Christian times named themselves ‘Oriental Romans’, and after the division of the empire ‘Eastern Roman Empire’.

The French academia promoted then the fallacious and deceptive term ‘Byzantine Studies’ and ‘Byzantine Empire’, projecting the name of the Pre-Christian Ionian colony of Byzantium onto the Roman Christian city “Nova Roma’ (New Rome), which was later called Constantinople and Istanbul. Sheer dementia and ostensible viciousness…

After all these lies, there was only one more fallacy to be invented: the otherwise nonexistent link of ‘continuity’ among

a) the disparate tribes of the Antiquity that were collectively called ‘Greeks’, although they never set up a united state of their own;

b) the Christian Eastern Romans, who formed a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, and multi-lingual imperial state, dissociating themselves from the Anti-Christian ‘Greeks’; and

c) the modern descendants of the Christian Eastern Romans, who were calling themselves ‘Romioi’ (Rumlar), their nation ‘Romeiko’, and their various languages ‘Romeika’.

This fabricated link of pseudo-continuity produced by the French academics is exactly what this fallacious manual calls as «Les Grecs à toutes les époques», i.e. «The Greeks throughout History». 

The book attempts therefore to present the ‘Greeks in all the epochs’ in a gravely sick effort of indoctrination that was applied to all French state functionaries, who had to reproduce this bogus-historical dogma wherever they were. With manuals like that, French and English diplomats, agents, explorers, merchants, antiquarians and fake scholars fooled and aptly manipulated the Balkan and Anatolian populations of the Christian Eastern Romans, who belonged to the Ottoman Empire. They convinced them to betray their own country, i.e. the Ottoman Empire, “because they were supposedly the ‘glorious’ descendants of the Ancient Greeks”; by so doing, the English and French colonial gangsters managed to monstrously destroy the identity, language and religion of the Christian Eastern Romans, while promising them a new great state that would replace the Ottoman Empire. The modern pseudo-state of Greece is what is left from those fake colonial promises.

The Ottoman Empire failed to timely find such publications, identify the hidden intentions of the gangsters who wrote them, and prevent the ensued developments. The conclusion is simple: the most difficult war is not carried out against military regiments, but against the evil pseudo-scholars of the Anti-Christian Western European and North American states of the Post-Renaissance times.

Response to a Turkish friend about the book ‘Les Grecs à toutes les époques’ of anonymous author


Now, I will respond to your question about the cover of the French book.  

Yes, I knew the entire series of 19th c. French books “Pour la Question d’ Orient”.

You have the entire book (Pdf) in attachment.

The title «Les Grecs à toutes les époques» means «The Greeks throughout History». 

As you see on the inner cover page, it is written by an anonymous author self-styled as «un ancien diplomate en Orient», which means «a former diplomat in the Orient». As it is the practice in every French book (in contrast with the English system), you have the list of contents at the end — on pages 433-436 of the book (starting with page 441/448 of the Pdf file). 

Scholarly (academically or scientifically or intellectually) the value of the book is nil. 

It goes without saying that every book published by an author, who does not present his true name, is an academically worthless book.

And so this book is as regards the History of ‘Ancient Greece’. 

It is not only a forgery and a falsification, but a very low level dissertation, if compared with academic bibliography that was published in the second half of the 19th c. about ‘Ancient Greece’.

Even more so, the book was not written with the ambition to be one of the best treatises of its time about the topic mentioned in the title.

However, the book has a tremendous value within a totally different sector of Humanities.

Its value can be revealed within the context of Western Colonialism, Hellenism, Orientalism, and the creation of the (inspired by the French) Modern Greek (: colonial) political, academic, intellectual establishment.

Furthermore, the book is very important for anyone, who wants to know details about the formation of the bogus historical dogma that the Modern Greek state imposed dictatorially in Modern Greece across all levels and sectors: primary and secondary education, universities and academic life, political ideology, publishing houses and books, newspapers and mass media in general.

Within these sectors, the book epitomizes what role France wanted to give to the Modern Greek state and how France instructed and educated Modern Greek politicians, diplomats, public sector employees, military, academics, journalists, high school teachers, theologians, priests, and intellectuals (in brief, the entire Greek regime in all its aspects).

As a matter of fact, what this book stipulated in … 1870 (!) is now believed as «historical truth», as «importance of the Greek civilization», and as «the diachronic contribution of Hellenism to the World History» among the colonial academia, the average French, English, other Western European nations, and the fake nation of ‘Modern Greeks’. The constructed, fake term of ‘Hellenism’ is conceived as the ‘cultural and ethnic/racial continuity of the Greek nation across History’, so for 3500 years. Such notion never existed. And all these silly descriptions are pure lies.

Hellenism is a nonexistent, evil ghost for racists who reject the historical truth that Cyprus -as an island- belongs to Asia, whereas Crete and Sicily are by definition African islands, and they were never considered as ‘European territory’ throughout History.

Today, all the paragons of the dictatorial Greek establishment believe about the fake, fabricated Greek nation the historical falsehood that this book presents as «true history» and as «extraordinary importance of the Greek nation diachronically». No challenge is allowed or tolerated, and no scholar can survive in that God-damned state, if he rejects the evil and racist pseudo-historical dogma that is imposed in a more totalitarian manner than Nazism in Hitler’s Germany and Marxism-Leninism in Stalin’s USSR.

Saying this, I don’t mean that this book was necessarily studied by Modern Greek politicians, diplomats, public sector employees, military, academics, journalists, high school teachers, theologians and priests, intellectuals, after 1870 and down to our days.

No! Perhaps very few Greeks knew this book at the time, and even fewer know about it today. But …………

1- Whatever French historians, archaeologists, philologists, philosophers, theologians, ethnographers, art historians, historians of religion, intellectuals and thinkers wrote and taught about Greece — either in books and articles exclusively related to Greece or in books and articles pertaining to other topics but which contained a brief reference to anything about Greece — was a reflection or repetition, expansion or explanation, consolidation or re-affirmation of what was contained in this book, from those days until now (so for no less than 150 years). 

2- Similarly, all Greek historians, archaeologists, philologists, philosophers, theologians, ethnographers, art historians, historians of religion, intellectuals and thinkers, who studied in France (or attended classes in Greece with professors who had studied in France), repeated the teachings and the texts, the ideas and the propaganda of their French professors and masters.

3- Even more importantly, all the historians, archaeologists, philologists, philosophers, theologians, ethnographers, art historians, historians of religion, intellectuals and thinkers of other nations (from Belgium, to Argentina, Mexico, Canada, Algeria, Lebanon, Iran, India, Cambodia, Vietnam, Japan, Russia, Poland, Romania, etc.), who studied in France (or attended classes in their respective countries’ universities with professors who had studied in France), repeated the teachings and the texts, the ideas and the propaganda of their French professors and masters.

In brief, this book is the epitome of what the top of the entire French academic-intellectual elite (and consequently, France itself at the most official level) has believed, taught, diffused and propagated worldwide about Greece and the Greeks (from the Antiquity to the end of the 19th c.) — all social, educational, professional levels included. 

This book could therefore be given another, clearer and most summarizing title: «the historical falsehood that France created and imposed worldwide about Greece» or «the official position of France about all things Greek». 

In a simple manner, one can describe quite accurately this book as a «guidebook for colonial masters and their puppets».

Practically speaking, there is nothing said in the book that is not believed, said and propagated by villainous persons like Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, etc.

However, this is not the only book authored by this anonymous author (or these anonymous authors); there were many other similar books that epitomized France’s position toward countries that the colonial regime of France wanted to educate, form according to the interests of Paris, and incorporate in the supreme plan in view of the (then impending and surely attempted) global Empire of France.

Another similar book is this: «Le Dossier russe dans la question d’Orient: la politique de la Russie envers la Pologne et la Turquie», published in 1869 («The Affair ‘Russia’ in the Oriental Issue: Russia’s policy toward Poland and Turkey»). Notice that both books were published at the time of the French Empire (under Napoleon III)! Quite interestingly, this book focuses on Czarist Russia’s policies toward «Poland» and «Turkey»! However, at those days, there was no Poland, because that land was divided between Prussia (and later Germany) and Russia.

Also, the appellation of the Ottoman Empire as «Turkey» was very typical policy of 18th-19th c. France and England.

This policy applied also to Safavid/Afshar/Qajar Iran; it was distorted as «Persia». But Iran is not Persia, and Persia is not Iran.

This policy applied also to the Mughal Empire, the Gorkanian of Delhi; it was distorted as «India», which is a fake term for the entire subcontinent, because for the Ancient Iranians, «Hindush» (India) was basically a mere satrapy, i.e. an administrative province at the eastern confines of the vast Achaemenid Empire. The Iranian territory designated by this term was small and included parts of the today’s provinces Sindh and Punjab of Pakistan and Rajasthan of India. The term was later used by the Greeks and the Romans, but -again- it never denoted the entire subcontinent. About:

The contents of this book explain in what points Czarist Russian policy opposed the imperial plans of France in the cases of the Poles (in Eastern Europe) and the Ottoman Empire. You can find this second book (about Russia) here:

I came first to know about these two books, when I was a postgraduate student in France (1978-1981). I then came to know that these forged documents were extremely important for the colonial and messianic/apocalyptic plans or agendas of the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists in the 19th c. At those days, these secret societies (or groups of power) and the colonial countries (that they controlled and used) deployed their foremost effort to turn the then world into what the world has become today.

There are many other similar texts determining to newly initiated Freemasons, Jesuits and Zionists what the respective organization’s plans are — per topic or region (Russia, Serbs, Greeks, Northwest Africa, Turkey, Caucasus, Mesopotamia, Iran, Egypt, Sudan, Abyssinia, etc.). Thanks to your email, I made a small online research; I then found that the book about the Greeks is already translated in Turkish. You can find it here:

This is a simple thing to do. However, if someone tried to explain why, how, and in what one pseudo-historical point (: a historical distortion) made in the book is politically useful to the French, he would have to expand much, but he would bring forth impressive and unexpected results. The reason is simple: few people worldwide know why the colonial powers needed the specific lies and historical distortions that they produced, when invading a territory either in Asia or in Africa. But in these points are hidden all their secret plans. 

Another issue related to both books is the life of the publisher, Edouard Dentu:

He was associated with the Mormons, a branch of Freemasons related to a group of Zionists. Dentu was known for his powerful connections, his involvement in Black Magic, and many other evil activities. Here you can get a small idea about who this disreputable person was: 

The conclusion is simple.

The Ottoman Empire was a useless and self-disastrous state that failed to have agents working in France and able to catch documents like that. The worthless Ottoman sultans, the stupid sheikhulislams and theologians, and the entire court and administration were totally unable to understand what was under preparation under their nose (without them understanding anything) and how close the total obliteration of their state was. 

The Ottomans sultans, like the shahs of Iran and the Mughal emperors, were idiotic enough to believe that victories can happen in the battlefields. That’s stupid.

The real victories are a matter of intellect. Good or evil, it does not matter. A good but stupid person will always be defeated by an evil but intelligent person. 

Of course, all this colonial work of historical falsification is evil. But it was greatly successful for those who undertook it. Why? Because due to this forgery, the Ottomans were thrown out of almost all of their provinces!

And without Kemal Ataturk, there would never be Turkey today. On the contrary, there would be some Greek provinces in «Constantinople» and in Western Anatolia; Armenia would be extended as far in the West as Malatya; there would be a Kurdistan and a Greek Pontus state; and Antakya would be part of Syria.

You want to know what would happen in Cappadocia?

If there was no Kemal Ataturk, in Central Anatolia, there would be 5-10 small Turkish states (Kayseri, Sivas, Konya, Yozgat, Amasya, etc.) stupidly fighting against one another, as it happens nowadays in Somalia, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Sudan, Yemen, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, etc. This is what the colonial powers want for Turkey: the final solution for Anatolia. 

The only chance for a country to oppose the colonial regimes of France, England, US, Israel, Holland, Canada, Australia, etc. is to present in public the evilness of the colonial agenda, by revealing how, why, and in what each historical falsification helped the colonials to setup today’s evil world. All the rest is useless, because the colonial powers can easily oppose and quickly destroy their enemies.

But the revelation of the colonial agenda’s needs for historical falsification will enrage the colonial powers to total paranoia. 

Either you like it or not, it will be like this: either this (as I suggested) will happen or the nuclear extermination under preparation will take place.

This is all about this book!

Edouard Dentu!!! Hahaha!! Good publisher!

Do you know who his friend was?  

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, the anarchist!

The evil guy who said that «property is theft»!

Who believes this today?

The Satanic fake pope of Rome! Francis I: the Jesuit pope! A gangster worshipping Satan by Black Magic techniques, the fake pope of the homosexual marriages!

Benedict XVI was far better; incomparably better. And everything he said about Muslims was up-to-the-point!


Download the article in Word doc:

Kemal Ataturk 1938-2020: the World’s Greatest 20th-century Statesman betrayed by Islamists, Pan-Turanianists & Kemalists

Exploring the Inexorable Constellation of Kemal Ataturk

A tribute in loving memory …


I. Several 20th-century Statesmen

II. What it takes to be a Statesman

III. The Dreadful Disaster that Kemal Ataturk averted

IV. Kemal Ataturk compared to Several Western Statesmen

V. Who was the Real, Historical Kemal Ataturk?

VI. Kemal Ataturk & Lenin: today’s Islamists are closer to Lenin

VII. Kemal Ataturk, Islamic Spirituality, and the Secular Nature of the Islamic State

VIII. Kemal Ataturk and the Origins of his Spirituality: an Embarrassment for All Western States and Secret Societies

IX. Kemal Ataturk and the Nature of his Accomplishments

X. Kemal Ataturk’s Everlasting Legacy and Turkey’s Betrayers

A – The Islamists

B – The Pan-Turanianists

C – The Kemalists

Many people consider Hitler as the world’s greatest 20th-century statesman, but the Führer (1889-1945) was still fighting when almost the entire territory of his earlier expanded country was already invaded by foreign armies; if we don’t take into consideration the factors ‘failure’, ‘results’, ‘endurance’, ‘posterity’ and ‘legacy’ when evaluating statesmen, then eventually anyone of them could be described as ‘the world’s greatest statesman’.

I. Several 20th-century Statesmen

Hitler’s legacy was rejected in his own country by means of military victory of his enemies, and Germany remains still occupied by World War II’s victorious allies 75 years after Hitler’s disappearance. This is not an example to follow.

Others show a predilection for an array of Communist theorists and dictators, finally selecting one of them as the world’s greatest 20th-century statesman: Lenin (1870-1924), Stalin (1878-1953), Mao (1893-1976) or even Fidel Castro (1916-2016). The differences among these undoubtedly influential personalities are great, but none of them left enduring state structures, although all of them marked their times with tumult. Lenin’s theory about the dictatorship of the proletariat was swept away by his successor; Stalin’s appalling practices had nothing to do with anything written by Marx, Engels, Lenin and many other theorists whose either incomprehensible or debased concepts fascinated mostly those who never understood them; thank God, Nikita Khrushchev (1894-1971; Никита Сергеевич Хрущёв) terminated that lethal legacy. And today, 29 years after the fall of the Soviet Union, only the inhuman paranoids of today’s totally corrupt American Left attempt to revive a most farcical version of those statesmen’s worthless concepts and absurd theories that evidently disfigured and calamitously destroyed Russia.  

Only 44 years after his death, Mao (毛泽东) has almost no place, even as a picture, on the walls of Zhongnanhai (中南海), the Chinese Imperial Gardens that became the headquarters of the Communist Party of China (中國共產黨), and on the walls of the central government (State Council). Memorabilia from an almost totally forgotten past, the hammer and sickle are by now amiable decorative themes for participants to watch every five years in the otherwise meaningless and ceremonial, national congresses of the CPC. In all of these cases of statesmen, legacy is tantamount to irreverence.

Several other 20th-century statesmen are still revered for the political marketing needs of the decayed states of Western Europe and North America: Roosevelt (1882-1945), Churchill (1874-1965) or even the picturesque and tragi-comical figure of Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970). Since the needs for this deceptive propaganda are related to today’s politics, one realizes quasi-automatically that these personalities are still referred to by the criminal forgers of the Western World’s mainstream media and by the various representatives of the lawless regimes of the West only for the commemoration of the 20th century’s most nefarious and most disastrous event, i.e. the allied victory in 1945. But for the outright majority of the Mankind, these nonexistent statesmen, who were mere caretakers in times of war, are totally insignificant or rather unknown. In fact, they left no legacy, because their deeds had nothing ingenious, nothing innovative, and nothing inventive.

There were certainly important statesmen during the 20th c., but it would be absurd to consider as great statesman someone who either introduced catastrophic innovations or viewed his tenure as a mere service to the cause of an immoral and inhuman regime’s continuity – and this is the type of regime that prevailed in England, the United States, and France during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Neither can a statesman be viewed as great, if his deeds impacted negatively or even disastrously vast parts of the world. In this sense, Georges Clémenceau (1841-1929), Lloyd George (1863-1945), and Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924) were as disastrous and as ominous as Hitler or Stalin, because, due to their deeds, practices, choices and decisions, more people were either involved in unnecessary strives, rebellions, battles, and wars or oppressed and persecuted, killed and massacred in Asia, Africa and Europe than those persecuted or killed by the aforementioned German and Soviet statesmen. However, for the needs of generation comparison, one must admit that the three Western statesmen of World War I were ostensibly superior to their WWII counterparts.

II. What it takes to be a Statesman

All accounts made, a remarkable statesman must

i- accurately discern the environment in which he finds himself, see the past and the recent developments in perspective, and identify exactly where they lead to, if no other factors intervene and no effective reaction is undertaken, 

ii- dissociate himself from a flawed, immoral, hypocritical, tyrannical, and nefarious regime,

iii- identify the real, diachronic values of his culture and land, act accordingly, and eventually reinstate them,

iv- demonstrate virtue as per the terms of his nation’s historical traditions and moral values,

v- become known for his ingenious choices, decisions and practices,

vi- deliver innovative and inventive approaches to the needs of his society,

vii- defend, promote, consolidate and expand national identity and cultural integrity,

viii- found, transform or restructure a state that will be exemplary, enduring and based on Justice, Equality, Equity, Truthfulness, Solidarity, and Love,

ix- re-organize or re-engineer his society toward knowledge, wisdom, creativity, productivity, equilibrium and tolerance,

x- promote individual initiative, amelioration and expansibility, and

xi- be an example in terms of accurate perception, conceptual and active thinking, self-criticism, adaptability, and alternative option identification.

III. The Dreadful Disaster that Kemal Ataturk averted

The search for the world’s greatest statesmen is a quest for human advance. People have the tendency to turn to sizeable or powerful states in order to identify great statesmen; that’s an extremely wrong practice. Across History, great states involve basically unimportant rulers; the great sovereigns are an exception in the great states. Either in a small or big country, a great statesman is certainly someone, who can go against the stream, stop the decay, and reverse the trend. And this is exactly what Kemal Ataturk did to the Ottoman Empire, which was abandoned for Türkiye Cumhuriyeti (Republic of Turkey) to rise totally unrelated to, and absolutely unaffected by, the otherwise agonizing caliphate’s burdens, crimes, errors and decadence.

Even among Turkey’s most enthusiastic admirers and supporters of Kemal Ataturk, today many fail to realize that, without Kemal Ataturk, the entire territory of Turkey would be divided into many parts, which would be annexed and administered by either local elites ‘educated’ (i.e. taught how to hate their own land and those of the neighbors) in Western capitals or the criminal colonial regimes of the West that were setup by the historical enemies of Anatolia (i.e. the fake Popes of Rome, the Franks and the Anglo-Normans) as per below:

a) a part of Western Anatolia, Eastern Thrace, and Constantinople (in that case not Istanbul anymore) for Greece,

b) a part of Eastern Anatolia from Kars and Rize down to Malatya for Armenia,

c) a northeastern part of Anatolia for a minor coastal Pontus state,

d) a southeastern part of Anatolia for a multinational (Zaza, Turkmen, Kurmanji, Aramaean Christian, Arabic-speaking, and Yazidi) state fallaciously called “Kurdistan” (which would be plunged into interminable strife, war, oppression and massacres),

e) a minor southern part (Antioch/Antakya) that would be disastrously placed under French colonial rule, and

f) another southern part (from Mersin to Bodrum) under Italian mandate.

Even worse, the rest of the territory, i.e. the Central Anatolian plateau of Cappadocia (which means ca. 25% of today’s Turkey’s territory), would be deliberately plunged into incessant strives and civil wars generated by the colonial powers, which would greatly utilize all the idiotic Muslim theologians, ignorant muftis, uneducated cadis, uncultured sheikhs and lunatic imams for their colonial plans that all these cretins had no chance in a billion to possibly identify, let alone oppose (as it happened in the case of so many French and English colonies in Africa and Asia). Therefore, an enormous ethnic cleansing, an atrocious genocide, and a real Christian Reconquista in Anatolia would ensue (if Kemal Ataturk did not appear as a deus ex machina), totally changing the face of the wider region between Italy and Iran, which was at the time another great Islamic empire (under the Qajar dynasty) at the brink of total collapse and disintegration, just like the Ottoman Empire.

All this was prevented only because of Kemal Ataturk.

IV. Kemal Ataturk compared to Several Western Statesmen

Through another viewpoint and in comparison with the other three great European monarchies that collapsed in the aftermath of WWI, the founder of Modern Turkey

i) first, managed to save the inhabitants of the parts of the Ottoman Empire that he controlled, namely he achieved to

a) thwart the colonial invasion, which would be disguised under the lawless and criminal name of ‘Mandate’,

b) liberate the people from the burden of the past and from the darkness and the ignorance of the Ottoman Empire, which had already fallen in decay since the end of the 16th c. (date in which the Islamic Civilization ended),

c) rescue the people from the absurd and paranoid pseudo-Islamic theology of the Istanbulite indoctrinated ulemas, and

d) fully rehabilitate and empower the people, thus making them able to compete at the international level – in striking contrast with what happened in backward Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Algeria, etc. whereby the compact imposition of Western colonialism triggered all the chaotic reactions that ended up with Islamic terrorism. and

ii) second, ensured that all the inhabitants of Modern Turkey avoided the following disastrous conditions that befell on Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary:

a) the unprecedented persecution, the inhuman slavery, and the incredible horrors and hecatombs that the criminal ruling minority of Soviet Union reserved for all the populations of Czarist Russia that were not lucky enough to have the destiny of the Baltic states and other western extremities of the Romanov realm,

b) the descent into the nether world that the Germans have experienced, after the departure of Kaiser and until today, because Germany is still not an independent state, because the country has been governed by an alien elite, which consists of puppets of the Allied Occupation, and for this reason, this elite does not express in any sense, let alone defend, the German national interests, and

c) the irrevocable pulverization of Austria-Hungary {which was dismembered and its territory was distributed into twelve (12) states (as of today), after the lawless treaties of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (1919) and Trianon (1920): Italy (Tyrol), Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Romania, Ukraine, Czechia, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary and Austria.

In other words, Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey did not experience

– either the massacres and the destructions that took place in Germany (1919-2020) and Russia (1917-1991)

– or the fragmentation that was imposed on Austria-Hungary after 1919.

Similarly with the territories lost to Austria, the Ottoman lands robbed by the colonial powers (namely today’s Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Qatar, and UAE) constituted the majority of the Ottoman territory; however, in striking difference with the Central European monarchy, the territories lost for the Sublime Porte (باب عالی‎ / Bab-i Ali) were insignificant, marginal, and to large extent, they were empty deserts.

Kemal Ataturk died in Istanbul at 9:05 am of Thursday, 10 November 1938. How symbolic! How impressively does it highlight the diametrically opposed world concepts of Ataturk and Hitler! In fact, Ataturk died after the terrible Kristallnacht was over! Since then 82 years have passed.

If the legacies of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao are by now extinct, rejected and mostly reviled, can one claim that the political heritage left by either the WWI generation of colonial statesmen (Georges Clémenceau, Lloyd George, and Woodrow Wilson) or their WWII counterparts (Roosevelt, Churchill and Charles de Gaulle) has survived?

Although today’s Western countries and sociopolitical elite pretend to represent a continuity of sociopolitical, economic, intellectual and academic tradition, in reality they serve purposes, they believe theories, they diffuse delusions, they promote practices, and they implement agendas that are at the antipodes of the world as conceived, desired and respected by both earlier generations of Western statesmen.

Despite their fake claims that they respect freedom of speech, today’s Western statesmen prohibit free speech and penalize everyone, who denies the falsehood of the so-called Holocaust and the forgery of the so-called Armenian Genocide. At the same time, they conceal other, real (i.e. planned) and worse genocides, like the Oromo Genocide carried out by the Amhara Abyssinians in Eastern Africa over the past 150 years and the Turanian Genocide carried out in Russia over the past 450 years, after the Muscovite expansion undertaken by Ivan IV the Terrible (Иван Грозный). The Western World’s bogus-‘freedom of speech’ means that you demand ‘freedom’ for the ‘Kurds’ (who are not one nation, but many different nations, namely Kurmanji, Zazaki, Bahdinani, Yazidi, Shabak, Sorani, Gorani, Faili, Ahl-e Haq, Hawrami, Ardalani, etc.), but not for France’s oppressed and persecuted nations, i.e. the Basks, the Corsicans, the Catalans, the Occitans, the Alsatians and the Bretons.

Due to grave distortion of concepts, total disregard of values, and absolute perversion of connotation, Western European bogus-freedom ended up in criminal acts (abortion), abnormal practices (homosexual marriages), and corruptive operations (adoption of children by homosexual ‘couples’).

Gender-based linguistic tyranny and demented dogmatism, mainstream media dictatorship, social media degeneration, lifestyle debasement, educational degradation, and finance capitalism laced with the idiotic Modern Monetary Theory brought fourth destructive conditions of socioeconomic-sociopolitical life that would have been totally denounced as defective, nefarious and inhuman by all the aforementioned Western statesmen of the 20th c.

In other words, today’s West has nothing to do with early 20th c.’s West anymore, and the above mentioned WWI and WWII statesmen’s heritage is null and void.

Contrarily to the Soviet Union and to Nazi Germany, Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey still survives; contrarily to the morally degenerated Western European and North American states and societies, Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey demonstrated impressive resistance to social corruption, lifestyle decay, and cultural decomposition; and contrarily to today’s China, Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey did not shift from Mao’s version of Communism to the mixed socialist market economy that Xi Jinping (1953-; 习近平) has successfully managed to keep in balance.

But has Kemal Ataturk’s legacy survived?

V. Who was the Real, Historical Kemal Ataturk?

Kemal Ataturk was not a man of theories, ideas, and words; he was a man of action, deeds and effective practicality. Many theorists and ideologists wanted and tried to implement concepts and ideas; but their effort ended up in monstrous deliveries about which all realized that they were at astronomical distance from the original thought. Contrarily to the delusional theories of these ominous persons and to their calamitous implementations, there was never a theory or ideology such as “Kemalism”.

Kemal Ataturk did not write a treatise, did not compose any theory, and did not elaborate an ideology about

– how 20th c. Muslims can best organize their societies and establish a pertinent system of governance that will enable them to fully compete with the world’s leading states,

– the way Turkic nations can achieve national independence, comprehend historical identity, preserve cultural integrity, set up a fully functional and efficient system of governance, and establish an interstate organization, and

– the method through which Anatolia would synchronize with Western Europe and North America in the early 20th c.

He wanted only to exactly implement the correct solution to an urgent problem that would become lethal to vast populations: the problem’s name was ‘Ottoman Empire’.

As a matter of fact, Kemal Ataturk did not act based on text, program, ideology or theory, and if we refer to his early conceptualization of a state and to its ultimate implementation of the concept, we soon understand there is no such distance as the chaos that separates Marx’s theory from Lenin’s adaptation of Marxism or even the enormous space between Lenin’s published works in the 1900s or 1910s and Lenin’s newly proclaimed state in early 1924.

Only 19.5 years separate Kemal Ataturk’s death from his start as a statesman (his disembarkment in Samsun: 19 May 1919 – 10 November 1938); but if one compares his early speeches and the condition to which Turkey was risen few months before the Halâskâr Gazi (‘the victorious savior’) died, one concludes that the founder of Turkey delivered exactly what he promised. This testifies to an exceptional foresight in terms of both, human nature and human society. Ataturk understood in full depth the human being at the personal level, namely how humans function, act, perform and react; and at the same time, he realized very well the human being at the collective level, namely the way human communities tend to behave, operate, produce, create and eventually destroy their own deeds and achievements.

There is a key point of differentiation: contrarily to all theorists, ideologists and intellectuals, who rose to power, Ataturk knew exactly where each and every of his decisions was leading to. As personal qualification, this outstanding trait can be attributed to both, an innate talent and the formation of a military. Ataturk was the Geometer of Governance.

Ali Rıza oğlu Mustafa (as his original name was back in 1881) graduated from the Ottoman Military College (Istanbul) in 1905 and started then his legendary military career that brought him to the four corners of the Ottoman Empire, before making of him the great hero of Gallipoli in the portentous Battle of Çanakkale that Western historiographers rather call ‘the Dardanelles campaign’. Leading the Ottoman 5th Army (along with Enver Pasha and the German General Otto von Sanders), the then Mustafa Kemal Bey prevailed over the worldwide colonial military elite, namely the English Ian Hamilton, Herbert Kitchener, John de Robeck, William Birdwood, and Winston Churchill, and the French Henri Gouraud and Maurice Bailloud some of whom were more than 30 years older than him, therefore having enormously richer experience at the battlefield. Without a unique talent of foremost exactness of movement, Mustafa Kemal Bey would have lost the battle or even been killed.

However, the innate vocation of the young Ali Rıza oğlu Mustafa became evident quite earlier, notably when he enrolled at the Ottoman Military Academy (1899), and even earlier, when at the age of 15 (in 1896) he enrolled in the Monastir Military High School (today’s Bitola in Macedonia). His inclination toward exactness, practicality, effectiveness and discipline was however demonstrated as early as 1893, when at the age of 12, he took the entrance exam for the Salonica Military School (Selanik Askeri Rüştiyesi).

Of all the other personalities suggested as the world’s greatest 20th-century statesman, only Charles de Gaulle was a career military. These people remind us at times of the great conquerors of past historical periods; their world perception is such that they believe utterly that their deeds and achievements speak for themselves. In this regard, Kemal Ataturk is far closer to Timur (Tamerlane), to Genghis Khan, to Caesar, to Alexander, to Darius I the Great, and other earlier great Oriental monarchs.

These people never view life as related to human theories, baseless ideologies, arbitrary doctrines, useless thoughts, or circumstantial feelings and desires; these people live at a spiritually much higher level. They have -due to their intuition, education, traditions and culture- a well-structured conceptualization of the world and an accurate perception of the existing balance of power and of their abilities; then, they set their absolutely realistic targets of action and they deploy their maximum effort to achieve them. Last, to the aforementioned, they add their energy, practicality, resourcefulness, persistence and commitment.

VI. Kemal Ataturk & Lenin: today’s Islamists are closer to Lenin

Contrarily to Lenin’s action, which was a mere translation of his unrealistic theories and dogmatic ideology, Kemal Ataturk set his targets and tried to achieve them in the easiest and shortest way. Practicality involves automatically a realistic and accurate approach to and evaluation of every situation. Many opponents attempted to denigrate Kemal Ataturk as an opportunist, but this is irrelevant, because opportunism is related to theories, ideologies and efforts of materializing them. The difference between Lenin and Kemal Ataturk already at the start was tremendous.

Lenin wanted to eliminate the czarist establishment, because of his own theory and ideology. Lenin did not consider the czarist monarchy as impossible to improve and unable to catch up with the rest of the great powers; simply he did not want the monarchical system to improve, because he became captive of the theory about the dictatorship of the so-called proletariat (a nonexistent, arbitrarily formulated, entity), which he inherited from Marx and later expanded.

Quite contrarily, Kemal Ataturk wanted to improve, empower and strengthen his country; he simply knew that the Ottoman Caliphate was an impotent and obsolete institution, which -because of many reasons- was ostensibly damaging the future and the potentialities of its inhabitants, while at the same time, it was totally impossible to rectify and ameliorate. In fact, the Ottoman Empire was a dead corpse that needed merely to be buried; because of its own numerous inadequacies, misperceptions, misconceptions, malpractices, mistakes, and catastrophic inadaptability, the Sublime Porte had become the Gate of the Hell for its unfortunate inhabitants.

Due to prevailing theological rigidity, doctrinal sterility, social counter-productivity, intellectual enslavement, and economic impotence, the state of the sultans and caliphs had reached its end – already long before Mustafa Kemal was born. But Kemal Ataturk pursued his targets and fought for his cause, without theorizing about the forthcoming end of the Caliphate. When a significant part of Kemal Ataturk’s targets were already materialized (1923), it became evident to all that the Caliphate was already part of the past.

If one clearly understands the colossal difference between the empty and unwise theoretician and the experienced and high-calibered military officer, one easily comprehends how divergent their respective systems and methods of governance were. When his theories proved unrealistic, Lenin was forced to start improvising; and he did so constantly and in desperate search of a success that would never come. Quite contrarily, Kemal Ataturk did not have to advance “one step forward, two steps back” (шаг вперёд, два шага назад) like Lenin, but he went ahead like an experienced military who knows the terrain.  

This clarifies the present situation very well: today’s Islamists are closer to Lenin than to Ataturk. By being totally deprived of any sense (let alone practice) of Spirituality, by incessantly desecrating a religion that they never understood and which they currently ideologize as a Modern European political ideology, all groups of Islamists only distort a cultural heritage that they never felt, studied or comprehended. So, all of them, without understanding Kemal Ataturk’s conceptualization of the world, targets, achievements and legacy, renounce hysterically his deeds and exploits.

In fact, they are merely theorizing (like Lenin did), while being totally disconnected from the down-to-earth reality. If they were able one day to get absolute power, they would destroy Turkey in months, if not weeks. Czarist Russia and the disastrous consequences of the October revolution are a very good example indeed. Similarly, if Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey were to end, immediately civil war, famine, massacres, and chaos would ensue, not because of other powers’ inimical stance to Islam (which is the typical Islamist excuse) but due to the Islamists’ absolutely unrealistic targets, ignorance and paranoia.

Extremists of both sides, Islamists and atheists alike, have constructed a fictional Kemal Ataturk against whom they have made of sorts of nonsensical reproaches and to whom they have attributed all types of lies and distortions. Kemal Ataturk was not a historian or a historian of religions, but he knew briefly and very accurately the History of Islamic Caliphates, the Islamic search for Spirituality, the decomposition of the Islamic religion across the centuries, its degradation into a worthless and purely shameless theological system whose often evil proponents were able to ‘justify’ all monstrous deeds of ignorant, inhuman and criminal caliphs, sultans and shahs. The utilization of the religion of Prophet Muhammad for the material and often monstrous purposes of governance had become an extremely lenthy and absolutely nauseating story.

Today’s pathetic sheikhs, imams and theologians are illiterate enough to think that Knowledge, Understanding, Perception and Wisdom need volumes of endless texts to be achieved; this quantitative approach is a subtly and imperceptibly formed misthought of materialistic nature that can easily destroy the Mankind. Supreme human wisdom, accurate perception, deep understanding, and creative knowledge pertain to Truth; only a qualitative approach to them allows humans to plainly attain them. One man spends 100 years in the study of 100000 volumes and learns nothing substantive, whereas another man during one initiation that lasts only few hours learns much more; and a third man in a momentary intuition gets an otherwise unreachable perception and overview of the spiritual and material reality. Real wisdom is a transcendental faculty, not a mental-material(istic) apperception, and this is so, because the mind is part of the body and therefore totally unrelated to the soul of a man.

VII. Kemal Ataturk, Islamic Spirituality, and the Secular Nature of the Islamic State

Kemal Ataturk did not reject Islam, but the petty and worthless Ottoman evildoing in the name of Islam. As early as March 1924, at the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi), he meaningfully stated:

The religion of Islam will be elevated, if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past.

It is very clear, through this brief sentence that, as per Kemal Ataturk’s personal evaluation and understanding, Islam had been degraded into mere theological fornication; there can never be a discussion about “elevation”, if something has not been degraded first.

Two days after Kemal Ataturk said this sentence, the degraded and God-damned Islamic Caliphate was finally abolished (3 March 1924), after having already shrunk into a wrinkled territory accommodating (in the early 20th century) less than 5% of the world’s Muslims, due to the decadence and the impotence of its worthless sultans and to the deplorable ignorance and the evil dementia of its clueless sheikhulislams.

In total contradiction to the false theories and the historical distortions propagated today by Western Orientalists and pseudo-Muslim Islamists alike, Kemal Ataturk knew that there is a vast difference between spirituality and religion, and that Islamic spirituality prevailed many times over Islamic theology throughout History, thus changing the character of the Islamic states, re-orienting them toward creativity, inventiveness, originality and expressiveness in any field, from sciences to arts to wisdom. Under those circumstances, which occurred in many different historical periods (from the Abbasids to the Buyids, the Seljuk, the Ilkhanate, the Timurids, the Safavids, and the Mughal to name a few), the real nature of the Islamic states was secular, because the Shariah was not interpreted literally as per the modern pseudo-Muslim Islamists’ manner; then in these cases, the Islamic Law was stated and recommended, but not imposed.

And indeed, Kemal Ataturk’s state was not the first secular Muslim state; however this topic is vast and goes beyond the limits of the present article. How Kemal Ataturk envisioned the state that would substitute the decadent caliphate, which were his sources of inspiration, and on what past traditions of Spirituality he was based in order to materialize his targets we can understand only when we focus on and study in-depth

– his formative years,

– his relationship with the great German mystic Rudolf von Sebottendorf (who had recovered earlier lost keys of Bektashi-Qizilbash Spirituality, and also the rites of other earlier Islamic and Oriental Orders),

– his total opposition to the Freedom and Accord Party (Hürriyet ve İtilâf Fırkası),


– his resolute distance from the new CUP (Committee of Union and Progress; İttihad ve Terakki Cemiyeti / إتحاد و ترقى جمعيتی) leadership (the ‘three pashas’).

However, all these topics have long remained taboo in Turkey and worldwide for various reasons. The true presentation, in-depth analysis, and correct interpretation of the aforementioned contacts and positions of Kemal Ataturk are by definition an embarrassment for today’s Turkey’s main political entities, namely

– the Islamists, who -evoking but misinterpreting the Ottoman History- represent a theoretical and ideological background that the last Ottomans totally rejected and fully repudiated as heretic,   

 – the Pan-Turanianists, who constitute the direct offspring of the CUP (the three pashas), and

– the Kemalists, who for many long decades obscured Kemal Ataturk’s concepts, targets, practices and heritage in order to subtly misinterpret them, adjust them to their own interests and needs, and in the process, rule in his name, but in a most opposite manner to his.

VIII. Kemal Ataturk and the Origins of his Spirituality: an Embarrassment for All Western States and Secret Societies

At the same time, the true presentation, analysis and interpretation of the aforementioned contacts and positions of Kemal Ataturk are an embarrassment for today’s Western regimes and the (severely conflicting with one another) forces, lobbies, secret societies, and various Orders that control and use governments and states, namely

1- the Zionists (all the different branches and groups), who identify in Kemal Ataturk’s concept of state (so, not exactly today’s Turkey) the only powerful state able to resume worldwide prevalence. All branches and groups of Zionism reviled Rudolf von Sebottendorf’s spiritual supremacy, because its results would cancel once for all their power and targets. For this reason, they asked the help of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, which is one of their allies, to disastrously disentangle Rudolf von Sebottendorf’s young disciple Adolf Hitler from his master’s authority in the early 1920s: if the German novice were to be effectively initiated, like the great Turkish Bektashi mystic, Germany would become a totally different empire and no other state would be able to oppose Berlin. In brief, Zionists were the cause of the catastrophe that befell on them.

2- the Fake Freemasons of various pseudo-rites that operate at the antipodes of the original Freemasonry, which after the mid-1930s has operated in a most surreptitious manner, pending the anticipated fracture, demolition and disappearance of both, the Fake Freemasons and the Zionists. These fake Freemasons operated against Rudolf von Sebottendorf in the 1920s, infiltrated Thule Gesellschaft that he had founded, totally distorted the rite and the works of the society, forcing the founder to leave and leading the novices, the disciples and the other members to the materialistic dementia of Nazism and to the paranoid practices of that evil political ideology. At this point, one has to recall that the state founded by Kemal Ataturk involved no politics and no ideology, which are perverse and inhuman endeavors that degenerate governance and culture.

In this regard, it is noteworthy that, the various Islamist groups, which operate as low level agents of either the various groups of Zionists or the different lodges of today’s desecrated Pseudo-Freemasonry, carry out an idiotic propaganda of defamation of Kemal Ataturk, whom they portray as Freemason, ‘Jew’ or Dönmeh (i.e. a Sabbatean crypto-Jew hypocritically converted to Islam; as a matter of fact, Sabbateans were believed to secretively perform the Kabbalist practices of Sabbatai Zevi, despite their claim that they were Muslims). All this stands in total contrast with the historical reality, because Kemal Ataturk closed all Freemasonic lodges in Turkey (1935), a fact that shows how well informed he was about the degeneration of most of the world’s Freemasonic lodges into desecrated temples of blasphemous Satanists. Actually, after losing control of Thule Gesellschaft in Germany, Rudolf von Sebottendorf returned to Turkey and lived there for some years, before further proceeding to Central Asia and Tibet.

3- the Jesuits, who supported to some extent the Pan-Turanianists after having successfully infiltrated both, Freedom and Accord Party (Hürriyet ve İtilâf Fırkası) and CUP (Committee of Union and Progress), although the latter had initially been an outfit of the Fake Freemasonry in the 19th c. Ottoman Empire.

IX. Kemal Ataturk and the Nature of his Accomplishments

As a brief commemoration of Kemal Ataturk’s groundbreaking, innovative, and resourceful accomplishments, one must point out the following:

A- Kemal Ataturk accurately discerned the wider context in which he found himself, assessed his forces, and identified where his limits were.

Kemal Ataturk did not advance against the territories of the French and British mandates, not even up to Haleb (Aleppo) and Mosul, although his vision of state could be fully implemented in Mesopotamia, Syria, Phoenicia, Palestine and beyond. Kemal Ataturk realized that his new state needed time to be re-organized and re-arranged, re-affirmed and fully homogenized. This understanding and this attitude were also demonstrated in the case of Caucasus where all the Adjarians, Abkhazians, Azeris, Circassians, Dagestanis and Chechens would very much welcome a union with Turkey. And it was also shown as regards Iran, a country that has always been home to Turanian nations because in reality Iran and Turan have been identical throughout History.

B- Kemal Ataturk took gradually distance from his own state.

Seeing the ailing Ottoman Empire’s impotency and proven disability to cope with the imperative needs of contemporary states, Kemal Ataturk pursued his path and advanced toward his targets for almost five years (1919-1924), thus fully dissociating himself from the dying relic. By 1924, the state to which Kemal Ataturk belonged for most of his life was reduced to just one useless building: the palace of the last sultan. Compared with the groundbreaking deeds of the liberator and savior of Anatolia, the state of the family of Othman was a hilarious joke!

1922: Mustafa Kemal Pasha Ataturk (1880 – 1938), Turkish commander and later President, with camel drivers during the Turko-Greek War. (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)


C- Kemal Ataturk first identified the real, diachronic values of the Anatolian Civilization, then acted accordingly, and finally reinstated all the various Anatolian populations’ shared values.

Kemal Ataturk placed the diachronic values of the Anatolian Civilization and Culture at the epicenter of the new, contemporary society and secular state that he instituted. The Village Institutes (Köy Enstitüleri) were only one of the methods implemented to educate and update villagers, while also strengthening their attachment to their common traditions, moral values, and Anatolian culture. About:

“Darülfünun’dan Köy Enstitülerine” (

“Darülfünun’dan Köy Enstitülerine – 10 kasım 2011 –”


and notably:öy_enstitüsü#Dersler

(The entry published in the English Wikipedia is improperly short, particularly distorted, and absolutely useless, as it deliberately gives readers a minimal idea about the topic, thus promoting the Islamist agenda that the secret services of the colonial Western countries have set up.)

D- Kemal Ataturk demonstrated virtue as per the terms of his nation’s historical traditions and moral values.

This approach was highlighted in the Turkish Constitution of 1923. In the 1924 Constitutional Law Article 2, Clause 1, the following is stated: Türkiye Devleti, Cümhuriyetçi, milliyetçi, halkçı, devletçi, lâik ve inkılâpçıdır. Many of the terms used are almost impossible to easily understand, because they have ostensibly different connotations than those attested in Western Europe and North America. This becomes very clear in the definition of the term “milliyetçi” that many political scientists with no background in History would simply translate as “nationalism”, which is absolutely confusing and totally meaningless. About:

Milliyetçilik – this principle has nothing to do with what is called ‘nationalism’ in Central and Western Europe and North America. In striking opposition to West European ideologies of racism, race superiority, chauvinism, and nationalism, in Turkey it was declared that Türkiye ahalisine, din ve ırk farkı gözetilmeksizin vatandaşlık itibarıyla Türk denilir (irrespective of religion and race differences, the population of Turkey is called Turkish as regards the citizenship).

The use of the term Milliyet in Atatürk’s Turkey and in the Ottoman Empire is completely different. In structural terms, this word of Persian origin (milliyet) was used by the founder of Turkey as the word Ummah was used in the very early periods of the Islamic Caliphate. It involves a supra-national community with a common history within the same state. And this was said explicitly: ‘ortak mazi, tarih, ahlak ve hukuk Türk milletini bir araya getiren değerlerdir’ (common past, history, morality and law are the values that bring together the Turkish nation). This has nothing to do with the evil notion of racial ethnic identity; it alludes to cultural ethnic identity.

So, milliyetçilik means literally ‘supra-national identity founded on land-based communal unity, shared historicity and integrity of cultural heritage’. This connotation does not exist anywhere outside Turkey, and this is not a concept particularity but full evidence of human superiority over the forces of darkness, division and evilness of today’s inhuman elites.

Few people understood that it was quite normal for a great mystic like Mustafa Kemal, who was neither a historian nor a philologist, to have this approach. The constituent elements of the state that he had already envisioned (as a successive form to the ailing Ottoman Empire) before 1919 had to encompass many ethnic groups. As a matter of fact, when Atatürk took full control of Turkey’s territory, it was still expected that more than a million ethnic ‘Greeks’ (i.e. Romioi – Rumlar) would be Turkish citizens in the future. It is the Greek side at the Lausanne Conference that came up with the proposal for the exchange of populations that took place between Turkey and Greece in 1923-1925.

Furthermore, this approach to a ‘supra-national identity founded on land-based communal unity, shared historicity and integrity of cultural heritage’ reflects perfectly well the Celestial Order of the Oriental Empires, which was the cornerstone of Rudolf von Sebottendorf’s universal vision of an Imperial State enshrined in individual spirituality and human welfare as per the Ancient Oriental Monarchical Model and the Assyrian Sargonid Originality.

Because the 20th century’s leading German hierophant, and mentor of Kemal Atatürk, Rudolf von Sebottendorf remains an unknown figure to most, truly few understand the uniqueness and the truthfulness of Turkey as a conscious supra-nation rightful heir of more than 20 Oriental and Occidental, northern and southern civilizations’ achievements and accomplishments. And this was eminently reflected in Kemal Atatürk’s practices, as he rejected Pan-Turkism and Turanism as improper falsifications able only to distort the historical reality and plunge Turkey into chaos.

Turkey was geared to be the total rejection of the fallacious and unhistorical, racist concept of racial purity, chauvinism, race superiority, skin color supremacy, colorism and all the associate, nonsensical and evil constructions.

One can therefore understand that Hitler’s Germany was at the very antipodes of Atatürk’s Turkey’s and this is due to the fact that the spiritual exercises and other practices, the evocations, the divine conceptualization, the revelations of the Sacred, the initiation rituals, the Spiritual Ontology, the Cosmology, the Moral Order, the Royal Art, the Weltanschauung, the historical contextualization, and the admonitions of imperial rule changed totally in the Thule Gesellschaft after the organization was taken over by Anglo-Saxon fake Masonry, Zionists and other Satanists.


Turkey & 21st c. Geopolitics: the Advice I gave to the Turkish Establishment back in the mid-90s

(notably in the part:

III. Factors that prevented the Turkish Establishment from timely Disentangling from the ‘Western bloc’

B. The Real Meaning of the Six Principles of Kemal Ataturk’s State)

E- Kemal Ataturk became known for his ingenious choices, decisions and practices.

In this case, the introduction of the Latin alphabet for the writing of Modern Turkish was a truly ingenious decision that helped Turks become familiar with the major European languages and learn them more easily than others do. Suffice it to compare the German handwritings of a Turk and of an Egyptian or a Yemeni living in Germany, and one understands immediately how far-reaching Kemal Ataturk’s innovations were. Turks during the 20th and 21st centuries have been more conversant in European languages than the Arabic speaking people of Asia and North Africa, despite the fact that Turkey was never colonized, whereas all the former Ottoman provinces from the Emirates, Oman and Yemen to Eritrea, Abyssinia and Algeria came under French, English or Italian control (which implied obligatory courses of the colonizing power’s official language in the local primary and secondary education).

Because of this differentiation, the Turks have been used to learn foreign languages in order to cope and compete with the great European powers (Russia, Germany, Italy, France, England and Spain), whereas all Arabic-speaking people, who were driven and dehumanized by the psychological complex of inferiority (which is a form of colonial manipulation and cultural-educational-political maneuvering), have been hating the languages of their colonial masters and either have not been learning them at all or have not been learning them properly and impartially (and this has been done deliberately, out of the hatred which has traditionally been implanted in the pupils’ minds at the primary and secondary education level).

Contrarily to the Turks, who benefitted from Kemal Ataturk’s drastic changes and have an identity, Arabic-speaking people have no identity at all or have a fake identity, which is even worse. As a matter of fact, Arabic-speaking people are not Arabs; they belong to totally different nations with very diverse historical, ethnic and cultural backgrounds (Aramaeans in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine, SE Turkey, SW Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, Emirates; Copts and Nubians in Egypt; Cushites and Nubians in Sudan; Berbers in Libya and the Atlas region; Yemenites in South-Southeastern-Eastern Arabian Peninsula).

Each of these different nations never managed to achieve a proper and adequate nation-building because they were all confused with the fake, colonial ideology of Pan-Arabism or Arab Nationalism. This development generated the chaotic situation that currently prevails in countries like Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq – in striking contrast with what happens in Turkey and Iran. About:

circa 1916: Mustafa Kemal Ataturk ( 1881 – 1938 ), Turkish general, nationalist leader and president. (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

F- Kemal Ataturk delivered innovative and inventive approaches to the needs of his society.

Of course, entire books have already been published to narrate and analyze the numerous changes (devrimler) introduced by the founder of Turkey. However, it must be pointed out that the historical evolution from Caliphate to Cumhuriyet (Republic) was not just a state transformation or renewal, but an overwhelming replacement. Kemal Ataturk created his own state, and when the Caliphate could not function anymore, Turkey as a new state substituted the useless relic of the sultans and caliphs.  

Beyond the aforementioned, Kemal Ataturk’s most seminal, most ingenious and most trailblazing reversal was the termination of the old, Ottoman capital city and the proclamation of Ankara as the capital of the new state. The ominous, calamitous and dire role played for almost 1600 years by Constantinople – Istanbul was over, and the disastrous, ill-fated and accursed city was thrown once for all into the abyss of obliterated solipsism. Thanks to the founder of Turkey, the city that destroyed two great empires was forever condemned to permanently remain an otiose vestige of the past.

August 1922: Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881 – 1938) Turkish statesman and leader with the Turkish Diplomatic Corps at Ankara during the Greek-Turkey war in 1921-22. (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

G- Kemal Ataturk defended, promoted, consolidated and expanded national identity and cultural integrity.

A great number of people in Turkey and abroad misunderstood Kemal Ataturk’s innovations and considered them all as a form of intentional and comprehensive Westernization (or Occidentalization). This is actually a grave mistake and a serious misunderstanding or eventually a purposeful distortion. The founder of Turkey was neither a Westerner nor a Germanophile (or a Francophile, an Anglophile, etc.). It is misleading to believe that Ataturk ‘admired’ the Western progress or that he was enthusiastic about the Western culture. He simply viewed the world in pragmatic terms. What does the expression “pragmatic terms” mean?

This is what all the Islamists do not want to see, let alone understand. It is however very simple: in just 400 years, from 1500 to 1900, England, France, and Russia, which were smaller, weaker in every sense, poorer, less developed, less educated and less civilized than the Mughal Empire of South Asia, the Safavid Empire of Iran, and the Ottoman Empire in 1500, expanded and in 1900, became larger, stronger, richer, more developed, more educated and more civilized than the aforementioned three Muslim empires. Even worse, the three northern European states during the said period expanded at the prejudice of the three Muslim states, dismantling already one of them (the Mughal Empire), dangerously destabilizing and remarkably reducing the second (Qajar Empire of Iran), and comfortably and irreversibly decomposing the third (i.e. the Ottoman Empire, which in 1900 controlled already less than 50% of the territories that it possessed in 1790). The destruction of the Muslim Empires was so extensive and so detrimental that it would be suicidal for Muslims to pretend that nothing happened and that they could continue with their stupid theology and their useless Sunna. This is viewing the world in pragmatic terms.  

In 1920, Turkey had by definition to compete with the countries that were advanced in terms of scientific knowledge, industrial technology, socio-economic organization, civic discipline, and behavioral adaptation. There could not be any other choice: either the Turks would follow this path or ultimately every ignorant and idiotic religious leader or theologian (let alone low level ‘politician’) would end up as slave, lackey or puppet of the colonial powers without even understanding it.

However, this approach does not mean that Kemal Ataturk introduced Western European or North American customs, “because he wanted to change or eliminate the traditional Turkish culture” (as his irrelevant critics have always pretended); actually, the founder of Turkey did not try to copy and paste habits and lifestyle. On the contrary, he selected the essential, the functional and the necessary elements of Western behavior and scrupulously adapted them to the socio-cultural context of Anatolia (and he did exactly the same as regards the system of governance that he launched). In 1935, the average Turk was more “European” than the average Russian, Bulgarian, Romanian, Albanian – let alone Greek. As an eclectic thinker, Ataturk simply wanted the Turks to be able to perform like the Germans, to be free of the incommensurate complex of inferiority of the Egyptians and other Arabic speaking people, and to be acquainted with the customs, practices, and formalities of the world’s most advanced nations.

Any Turk traveling to Central and Western Europe for studies, research or work in the 1920s would make a ludicrous spectacle if dressed in the old Ottoman fashion. How could Turkey cope economically and financially with the world’s advanced countries, if the Turkish companies, banks and stock exchange did not function according to the Western standards of Free Market economy? It was therefore totally impossible for the workweek in Turkey to break for one day (namely Friday), due to traditions that were the reason of Ottoman Empire’s decay and collapse; ultimately Friday had to become a working day. The question when a Muslim will find some time to pray is his strictly personal affair – not the affair of the society, the state or the government. Companies cannot afford to accord ‘break time’ for prayer, because in such a case, the employee’s mind is stuck in unnecessary topics unrelated to work and performance indices.

There is a Modern Turkish word (constructed by Kemal Ataturk’s grammarians) that helps realize which the top priority was for the founder of Modern Turkey: “çağdaş”. This constructed word means ‘contemporary’ and also ‘up-to-date’. The word became also a personal name for men and women in Turkey, and it is quite indicative of the effort made by the secular establishment of Kemal Ataturk for the entire nation to get disentangled from obsolete structures and ineffective manners that engulfed the Turks in worthless forms of pseudo-religion. About:çağdaş andÇağdaş

The combination of traditional Anatolian Turkish culture preservation and scientific, technological, educational and socio-economic modernization is characteristically described in the title of a leading article published by the influential Prof. Erol Manisalı in Cumhuriyet (24 July 2018): “Atatürk’te zeybek, tango ve ‘yön’” («In Atatürk, there is zeybek, tango and ‘direction’»).

H- Kemal Ataturk founded a state in which every inhabitant was treated as equal with the rest and on the basis of justice, equity and solidarity.

Until its final collapse, the Ottoman Empire was the shameful realm where the brothers of a new sultan were almost institutionally massacred (for fear of eventual rebellion), the harem’s nauseating intrigues impacted many important state affairs (obviously catastrophically), the idiotic, ignorant and biased theologians scrutinized the sultan’s decisions (with disastrous results as it could always be expected), and the overwhelming majority of the population (Muslim, Christian or other) was viewed as a mere tool for tax extraction and any further utilization. Following the disastrous model of the so-called “bureaucratic byzantinism”, the Istanbulite theological circles consisted in a real cancerous tumor, as they treated the empire’s populations in a most disgraceful manner, as if human lives mattered only when compatible with their targets.

The iniquitous, partial, mendacious, utilitarian, and perverse nature and intentions of the Istanbul theological institutions were such that all the influential Ottoman theologians intended to rule the Empire by

a) tyrannically imposing their pseudo-Islamic fallacy on the Anatolian populations, which -being the vertebral column of the Ottoman Empire- vehemently rejected the Istanbulite meaningless theological doctrine and preserved their Islamic spirituality (being organized in Orders like the Mevlevi and the Bektashi),

b) viciously exploiting the Anatolian populations economically and militarily, and

c) incessantly oppressing, persecuting and eventually deporting them. This situation alienated the bulk of the Anatolian populations up to the extent that this situation contributed to the debilitation of the Ottoman state.

In other words, the same pattern that caused the collapse of the Eastern Roman Empire impacted also the Caliphate during the Ottoman times. The Patriarchate of Constantinople had tremendously contributed to the devitalizing and impairing the imperial state, because of its ceaseless religious-spiritual clash with the Anatolian populations that rejected the pseudo-Christian fallacy of the Constantinopolitan theologians. There were ceaseless revolts, unbearable Constantinopolitan oppression of the Anatolian populations, interminable massacres, and all forms of tyranny carried out by the every now and then dispatched imperial guards; at the end, the Eastern Roman Christian Anatolian populations accepted Alp Arslan and the Seljuks as true liberators. The exactly same story occurred in Ottoman Anatolia with the Şahqulu (Şahkulu) movement, the Bektashi, the Qizilbash, and the Mevlevis.

With Kemal Ataturk, Anatolia finally took its well-deserved and most necessary revenge over the elites of the caliphate’s capital. In 1924, thank God, all the imperial magistrates and potentates were reduced to the level of every simple farmer and cattle-keeper of Anatolia.

I- Kemal Ataturk re-engineered the Turkish society toward knowledge, wisdom, creativity, productivity, equilibrium and tolerance.

It was clear that, if the state itself was to be replaced by a totally different structure of governance, the society would have to be fully transformed, so that the inhabitants of the country be in a position to duly cope with the totally new environment and to effectively perform under the new rules. This was an experiment that Kemal Ataturk undertook without an ideology as a point of reference; this is another important point of differentiation between Lenin and Ataturk. The former had already written articles, speeches and books as to how to organize the state (the dictatorship of the proletariat) that he wanted to impose by using the support of the communist party – or of a faction of it, to be accurate. But when Kemal Ataturk liberated the country from foreign thugs, gangsters and invaders, no one knew what orders, measures, rules, and changes he would introduce. No one was able then to assume when this or that new law and measure would be launched and in what order the new rules would be introduced; and the founder of Turkey had never written before even a brief note or a list of the groundbreaking measures that were necessary to implement in order to remove the Turks from the Ottoman apathy and the “Islamic” putrefaction in which they found themselves.

Kemal Ataturk made it clear that human life has no value, if productivity and creativity do not characterize the activities and the targets of the human being. He wanted to take Turks out of the counterproductive, useless, abnormal and lethargic lifestyle that the Ottoman theologians had imposed whereby it was ‘enough’ for every Muslim to make five prayers per day, fast during the daytime in Ramadhan, carry out few more tasks and then live without discipline, target and commitment. However, the founder of Turkey was a moderate and balanced person, and thanks to this fact, his new country did not live atrocious and inhuman situations like the Soviet Stokhanovism; the Communists used to denounce the exploitation of humans by other humans, but did indeed exploit humans more than any other tyranny did in the History of the Mankind. In fact, the USSR had to wait until Nikita Khrushchev launched the de-Stalinization era in order to get rid of the useless medals “За трудовую доблесть” that bear witness to dehumanized beings reduced to robot-like lives for the sake of the state and its profitability.

With Ataturk, illiteracy was almost totally erased from Turkey; knowledge, science and education took central part in the life of a society ‘en pleine mutation’. Contrarily to the 19-year span of time when the Halâskâr Gazi was in power(1919-1938), the supposedly ‘Islamic’ society of the Ottoman times was gradually plunged into abject misery, despicable illiteracy, pathetic ignorance, and abysmal darkness, despite the fact that Islam, as religion, promoted knowledge over absurd belief, investigation instead of blind acceptance, and learning instead of lethargy. In fact, after 1580, the Ottoman Empire regressed instead of progressing.

Although, in the early 16th c., the Ottoman Empire was the inheritor of an entire millennium of Islamic Civilization, which was in fact the first World Civilization that encompassed the spiritual, cultural, moral, intellectual, scholarly, scientific and artistic heritage of all earlier civilizations, after the middle of the 16th c., the so-called ‘Sunni Islamic’ theological cholera prevailed at the level of the Istanbulite-Ottoman society and governance, notably during the reign of the gullible, suggestible Murat III (1574-1595). The prevalence of those theological circles in the Ottoman court brought forth the irrevocable demolition, elimination and expiration of the Genius of Islamic Civilization.

Ignorant people, who should have been killed as enemies of the Mankind, the then theologians, sheikhs, imams, etc. became influential in the Ottoman court, and due to their disastrous choices and utter paranoia, every scholarly-scientific exploration, every intellectual investigation, every artistic innovation, every conceptual re-evaluation, every transcendental reconfiguration, and every spiritual meditation were prohibited and labeled as “black magic”, “sorcery”, “witchcraft” and the like.

Those backward and silly fools considered as “evildoing” everything that they did not know, and due to their barbarism, they put an end to spirituality, sciences, arts, culture and civilization within the Ottoman Empire. After 1580 and the destruction of the Istanbul Observatory by the fanaticized mob that was guided by these evil and asinine theologians and imams, Islamic Civilization is considered defunct. It was only normal for the Ottoman Empire to progressively collapse and disintegrate afterwards, since its inhabitants were forced to live as per the inhuman orders that derived from the moronic Sunna-doctrine of the uneducated theologians who prohibited any other education than theirs.

In only 19 years, Kemal Ataturk overwhelmingly and spectacularly reversed this 350-year enduring, deplorable and self-disastrous situation; in this regard, his undertaking was far more difficult, far more unconventional, and far more staggering than Lenin’s, because the founder of Soviet Union did not find Czarist Russia in a state of long decadence but only of slow rise, progress and modernization in comparison to Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the countries of Western Europe and North America.

J- Kemal Ataturk promoted individual initiative, amelioration and expansibility.

There is one key point in which Life was not fair to Kemal Ataturk: he died very early. The founder of Turkey was only 57, when he passed away. Had he lived another 20 years (which is a modest estimate of life expectancy) we would have got a far more complete understanding of his vision, achievements, mindset, world conceptualization, and stance toward major world events (notably WW II, the Cold War, the so-called decolonization process, etc.). Speaking of Kemal Ataturk, few realize that in his time, there was no India, China was occupied by Japan, and the entire African continent was still divided in colonial zones (French, English, Italian, Belgian, Portuguese and Spanish).

Although the founder of Turkey dedicated most of his time after 1922 to the implementation of the changes that he introduced, we still do not have a complete idea about his view of the human being and about the extent to which he wanted to carry out a deep personal transformation in every Turk. Many scholars, historians, political scientists, intellectuals, analysts and commentators published thousands of books and articles about Ataturk as the founder of a brand new state, as the social transformer of Modern Turkey, and as the supreme educator of his nation. But no one viewed in the founder of Modern Turkey the spiritual mentor of every Turk and of every human.

At this point, we can accept that Ataturk did not only want to found a new, lawful, competent and effective state with social solidarity and free market economy, but he also desired to invigorate the average Turk and make him an unrestrained, extrovert, daring and entrepreneurial person well versed in taking risks and gambles for the benefit of his career, business, expansion and commitment. For Kemal Ataturk, every Turk’s best contribution to the national cause would be his own personal initiative in every field he would prefer to express his initiative, dynamism and inventiveness. We can therefore conclude that the founder of Turkey had exactly the same idea and the same wish for every human anywhere on Earth, if we take into consideration his famous motto (first said in one speech given in a town in Anatolia on the 20th April 1931) “Yurtta sulh, cihanda sulh” (Peace at Home, Peace in the World), which proves that Ataturk evidently demonstrated a sheer interest not only in Turkey but also in the world affairs.  

This critical trait was not however visible during the tenure of Ataturk’s ineffectual and uncharismatic successors, starting with Ismet Inönü and the cursed figure of Adnan Menderes. With the catastrophic and totally treacherous introduction of Western ‘politics’ in the governance of Turkey, with the constant involvement of the army in the politics, and with the untrue, mean and unreliable character of many ‘Kemalists’, after 1938 Turkey was progressively transformed into a bureaucratic state in the epicenter of which there was an enormous military-industrial complex. This situation was totally opposed to Kemal Ataturk’s vision of Turkey and harmed the average Turk enormously, by reducing him to a docile citizen who was asked to blindly obey the orders, the routine, and the Kemaluist doctrine of the public sector’s officials, who were in reality at the very antipodes of Ataturk. The gradual (1940 – 1970) bureaucratization of Turkey was one of the heaviest blows made against the state founded by the Halâskâr Gazi and a real disgrace to his memory.

K- Kemal Ataturk was an example in terms of accurate perception, conceptual and active thinking, self-criticism, adaptability, and alternative option identification.

From the aforementioned, one can safely hypothesize that Kemal Ataturk was not a dogmatic person; contrarily to his idiotic opponents, who are manipulated by the colonial Western powers without even understanding it, the founder of Modern Turkey was a balanced and tolerant person, known for his temperance and for accepting constructive criticism. Although he was a man of strong convictions, he knew very well that the best way to reconfirm the validity of one’s own arguments and decisions was to continually challenge them by examining several experiments. Ataturk experimented potential alternatives to several issues quite often and at times in cases of very serious and critical topics; the form of the state that he instituted was one of them!

The text itself of the Constitution of 1923 makes it clear that the founder of Turkey was convinced that a state made, manned and controlled by the people, governed and administered truthfully for the people, and advanced in parallel with the people (i.e. the entire society) should have the social support of only one organization, in which every person could become a member and every opinion could be debated sincerely. Contrarily to the disreputable constitutions of tyrannical Western states, which are shamelessly masqueraded as “democracies”, Turkey’s first and only real constitution did not allow any separate group of people to have the chance of separating themselves from the rest, the possibility of forming a fake and always unnecessary ‘opposition’, and the ability of cheating or deceiving others, let alone the outright majority, by means of debased and absurd theories, pathetic ‘political ideas’, comical and evil ideologies, and the nonsensical doctrines of the racist Western intelligentsia.

This testifies to two critical points:

First, Kemal Ataturk knew that the so-called modern democratic multiparty system is a permanent fallacy, an inhuman deception, and an evil distortion that severely harms the societies, misrepresents the people’s will, and ends up as a concealed form of monstrous tyranny. This is due to the fact that in the governance of a society there cannot be any ideas, theories or ideologies involved, because these mental endeavors consist in overwhelming misrepresentation of the reality, and as such they divide the unsophisticated people, who need no theories and no ideologies to duly perceive the reality and then normally live their lives.

Governance relates to reality; theories and ideologies are unreal fantasies and unrealistic fallacies of every eventually counter-productive or paranoid individual whose unnecessary assumptions and disastrous projections confuse the entire society. In any case, the paradoxical and deceitful scheme of ‘political parties’ reflecting falsely different ideologies (that are all equally impracticable, fictional and inhuman) is a modern times’ neologism and aberration that did not exist in any previous systems of non-monarchical states. That’s why Turkey’s Constitution of 1923 did not provide any details as regards the absolutely unnecessary establishment of various so-called ‘political parties’, simply because the Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (Republican People’s Party, founded on 7th September 1919) was the venue of all Turks, thus automatically canceling the dispensable ‘need’ for any ‘other’ party, let alone an ‘opposition’.

Second, the aforementioned situation clearly demonstrates how fake, wrong, mendacious and evil are all of today’s critics of Kemal Ataturk, when accusing him for having ‘westernized’ Turkey. The founder of Turkey did not ‘westernize’ but merely updated his society, empowering Turks with perefct tools of governance that guaranteed success in the effort of catching up with the technologically developed countries of the West; he did not copy any Western political system. Quite contrarily, he prevented Turkey from becoming a socio-political, ‘republican’, contamination like the US or France. When Ataturk launched his ingenious and multifaceted program, there were many non-monarchical states in Europe and America, which consisted mostly in multiparty establishments. However, these states were not accepted by Ataturk as trusted models or acceptable paradigms.  

The example of Italy’s 1923 elections (or parody of elections) was certainly studied very well by the man who conceived the pillars of Turkey’s Constitution of 1923; Turkey would not need either a Benito Mussolini or a Giacomo Matteotti. All people could express their own opinions within the Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, exactly because it was the venue for all the people (halk). This shows very well that Kemal Ataturk was not someone limited to mere copying & pasting Western systems and practices, but he introduced his own, new, and genuine system that best suited the Turkish nation of Anatolia.

However, despite Kemal Ataturk’s evident predilection for a one-party system of social organization and governance, he willingly accepted to test how a second party would function within the context that he had just established. This shows that he always examined various alternatives in diverse issues. As a matter of fact, in 1930, the founder of Turkey asked the former Turkish ambassador to France Ali Fethy Okyar to take the initiative and launch a new party, which would offer an alternative viewpoint on, and a different venue for, debates pertaining to Turkey’s social organization and governance. Consequently, soon afterwards, Okyar established the Serbest Cumhuriyet Fırkası (Liberal Republican Party) as a party of constructive opposition.

The experiment was quite indicative; within few months, the cancerous tumor of backward, ignorant and blind Islamists, i.e. Kemal Ataturk’s earliest opponents, enrolled in the new party and gathered there in order to voice their paranoia. These Islamists were filthy liars and hypocritical crooks, who did not give a damn about the ideas of liberal economy that the party founder wanted to promote with the support of Kemal Ataturk. These Satanic Muslims could cooperate even with the most squalid demons in order to express their sick hatred against the founder of Modern Turkey. Inevitably, even before the end of the year (!), Ali Fethy Okyar decided to close down the ill-fated party, before these uneducated gangsters managed to spit their ideological, pseudo-religious venom and impair the new, free and moral society that was being formed at the time. In Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey no one had the right to contaminate the entire nation by shamelessly uttering silly sentences of the type: “democracy is like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off”.

Indiscriminate freedom of speech is the worst enemy of the Mankind and the bitterest adversary of Human Freedom. Why this is so is easy to grasp: there is no freedom beyond the limits of Moral. Freedom is only a moral value; without Moral, there is no freedom. Otherwise, the Mankind will sail adrift and, after the immoral, absurd and totalitarian pseudo-concept of “indiscriminate freedom of speech” is imposed worldwide, humans will be asked to also revere the freedom of murder.

The fallacy of the modern Western tyrannies, which are euphemistically called ‘democracies’, is a vast topic that evidently goes out of the scope of the present article. However, the aforementioned example clearly shows that Kemal Ataturk, although he had the foresight to understand that multi-party system and partisan differentiation on the basis of various nonsensical ideologies is an absurdity and a deception, he gave it a try and wanted to check how a multi-party system functions in the daily life.

X. Kemal Ataturk’s Everlasting Legacy and Turkey’s Betrayers

Many people presently believe that the most determined enemies of Kemal Ataturk have been the various branches of Islamic Fundamentalism, Extremism, Radicalism, and Terrorism, i.e. the tenebrous realm of Political Islam, Wahhabism, and the other ramifications of today’s fake Muslims. But this is only a superficial reading of Modern Turkey’s History.

A – The Islamists

Every paranoid, who imagines that it is possible to establish today a state based on a modern theological interpretation of Islam (or any other religion), cannot be the enemy of anyone else except himself. The world of the Islamic Caliphates (as long as they were not in decay or coma for some centuries) and the modern world are two totally separated universes that have nothing in common and can never meet, let alone amalgamate. This was already known to Kemal Ataturk; that’s why he relied on Islamic princples, values and culture to create something new, authentic and absolutely Islamic, Anatolian and Oriental of nature.

The dogmatic idiots, who think it is possible to change Turkey, will see their own destruction with their own eyes; these ignorant people, like Turkey’s post-2002 parliamentary and presidential fake majorities (produced through electoral trickery and foreign interference in the backstage), in their fanatic and berserk effort to put an end to “secular Turkey” and substitute it with their fictional “Islamic Turkey”, will simply be left with no ….. Turkey at all! Then, it will be too late for them to regret and repent.

All states are structures erected as per their own particular rules; when these rules are breached, the structure falls apart. There is no need to wait for a conqueror, who will destroy a state, when the structure ceases to serve its purpose and to be what it was geared to be. In today’s world, contrarily to the Pre-Islamic Antiquity or to the times of the early caliphates, there is no vacuum left across the Earth. This parameter changes everything, because if a state falls apart nowadays, there will be no chance for rehabilitation and reunification; there will be either permanent division and strife (as in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc.) or loss of territory (USSR).

Although colonial fabrications and pseudo-states, like Egypt, Pakistan, India, Sudan, Algeria, etc., can eventually be multiparty ‘democracies’, ‘one-party’ tyrannies, military dictatorships, religious-theological autocracies, ‘constitutional’ monarchies or lawless despotic realms, a genuinely new and innovative state structure cannot be re-engineered. This happens because all pseudo-states constructed by the colonial powers were programmed in a way to best suit the variable interests of their colonial masters and consequently, they never had a proper infrastructure. These fake states never were (and they can never be) proper states, because they were geared to be mere caricatures of states, able to be transformed as per their masters’ desires.

Contrarily to these pseudo-states, the USSR could never be re-engineered, and that’s why it fell apart, and Russia lost an important part of its territory. Similarly, the US cannot be reinvented. And Western European ‘democracies’ cannot be restructured. For some decades, it was thought as possible that Communists could eventually rise to power in some of these Western European states (Italy, France, Portugal), but this would simply imply that these states would fall apart. Falling apart is tantamount to territorial loss in most of the cases. The example of China’s transformation into a form of “Socialism with Chinese characteristics” (中国特色社会主义, lit. “China-especially-colored Socialism”) is a unique case that had earlier been systematically developed and debated among the supreme hierarchy of the Chinese Communist Party (中國共產) as regards its cultural, intellectual, ideological and socio-economic dimensions and then implemented and crosschecked at all levels. But there have never been another Muslim Deng Xiaoping (1904-1997; 邓小平), except Kemal Ataturk himself.

Post-1938 Turkish Islamists, either they showed their real face or were masqueraded as Kemalists, were – all – unaware of the realities of modern world; most of them were totally unable to envision how their doctrine could possibly be implemented. The only honorable exception was the first ‘Islamist’ (the term is only conventionally used here) prime minister of Turkey Prof. Necmettin Erbakan (1926-2011), who was already a veteran statesman, when he became prime minister (June 1996 – June 1997) in coalition with Tansu Çiller as deputy prime minister. However, he had published his Manifesto for his Millî Görüş (National Vision) as early as 1969, i.e. five years before the first of the three times he was appointed as deputy prime minister in coalition governments. Necmettin Erbakan’s cultural, theoretical and socio-economic conceptualization had nothing to do with Political Islam; it merely consisted in an effort to revitalize the state of Kemal Ataturk by restating Anatolian Turkish Culture, promoting traditional values and moral integrity, reasserting Turkish national identity, reinvigorating the economy (with the then much needed privatizations), and modernizing the technical infrastructure of Turkey’s vast rural areas. Had Erbakan remained in the power for long, he would truly have become Turkey’s Deng Xiaoping.   

The scope of the present article is neither to enumerate the various rebellions started by incorrigible and retarded sheikhs, who could not comprehend Kemal Ataturk’s innovative initiatives and the reasons for them, nor to describe the failure of various ignorant imams, fallen mystics, and worthless theorists to realize that what they (during the 20th c.) used to think of Islam was not anymore the true, historical Islam (as spirituality, religion, wisdom, knowledge, literature, epics, science, art, culture, philosophy, architecture, tradition and civilization), but a decomposed and putrefied remnant that had no value at all anymore. In reality and despite all appearances, there is no continuity between the Historical Islam and today’s Muslims; there is a rupture, a gap.

In brief, what Ataturk’s opponents called and still now call ‘Islam’ is in reality ‘their Islam’; and disastrously enough for them, their Islam had nothing to do with the historical Islam as evidently (and on the basis of innumerable historical sources) practiced, revered and expanded throughout the centuries in many, variable forms and dimensions. This concerns notably Said Nursî, who is viewed as the source of inspiration of all posterior Islamist movements in Turkey, although he can by no means be described as an ‘Islamist’.

In reality, Said Nursî’s arbitrary acceptance of Western science and rationalism, and his demented effort to amalgamate two systems that are diametrically opposed to, and cannot intermingle with, one another were due to his

a) lack of knowledge (he did not study either the historical Islamic sciences of the Golden Era of Islamic Civilization or the Modern Western sciences),

b) erroneous assumption that the Modern Western sciences derived from the sciences of the Golden Era of Islamic Civilization (which is at the antipodes of the historical reality because, despite the enormous transfer of knowledge that took place between the civilized Orient and the barbaric Western Europe across the centuries, all the constituent elements, moral principles, basic concepts, and known data of Oriental sciences were first either rejected or misperceived, then erroneously contecxtualized, deliberately distorted, and finally used malignantly for the fabrication of a counterfeit, inhuman system of sciences),

c) confusion between the historical Islamic rationalism and the modern Western rationalism, and

d) limited understanding of the sources, dimensions, nature and targets of the Western materialism and atheism.  

Said Nursî was not opposed to the entire spectrum of Kemal Ataturk’s reforms. Before the rise of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) to power, Said Nursî was a lukewarm supporter of Pan-Ottomanism, if one correctly comprehends the term as a vague, non-systematized array of ideas and proposals as to just how to reinstate and reinvigorate the Ottoman Empire. Of course, he defended the Caliphate against the CUP, by participating in the Ottoman coup against CUP (1909), and later he opposed every notion of Pan-Turkism or Pan-Turanianism. But he had already comprehended very well the failure, the ineptness, and the ultimate corruption of the Constantinopolitan theologians and of the worthless bureaucrats of the Office of the Sheikhulislam. Actually, Said Nursî, despite all the lies said about him by the various pseudo-religious groups and bogus-spiritual orders instituted in Turkey over the past few decades, was happy with the fact that Kemal Ataturk destroyed the formal Ottoman religious establishment (an institution that had lasted 600 years: 1424-1924).   

Said Nursî (1877-1960), although he had almost the same age as Kemal Ataturk, was a man of very different background and orientation than the founder of Turkey. Said Nursî could not understand the mentality of a military officer, who became a unique reformer and statesman, after liberating parts of his endangered country. Contrarily to Said Nursî’s inclination to theoretically-intellectually accept the Modern Western sciences, Kemal Ataturk did not either ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ these academic disciplines: he simply wanted the average Turk to be well-versed in them in order to became able to catch up with the scientifically and technologically advanced countries and adequately modernize the newly founded state. It would be up to the prospective generations of Turkish scientists to fully accept, criticize, disapprove of, modify or even attack the foundations of the Western sciences, by establishing totally new approaches (other than mere material observation and experiment) to the study, the exploration, and the evaluation of the material and the spiritual worlds.

There was one thing that Kemal Ataturk would never accept: that an uneducated and ignorant person, after obtaining an undeserved position of authority, rejects beforehand something that he does not know; this is tantamount to utter paranoia. And this is exactly what all the pathetically indoctrinated and idiotic Islamists of today’s Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and so many other countries (Muslim Diaspora in Western Europe, North America, and Australia included) do ceaselessly, thus bringing forth calamitous developments and disproportionate disasters for the entire Muslim World.  

Kemal Ataturk and Said Nursî could have easily cooperated and set common targets within the national effort of reasserting the Anatolian Turkish culture, but this was prevented by the common enemies of both men. At this point, it is necessary to add that the ‘Ustadh’ or the ‘Bediüzzaman’ (‘master’ or ‘marvel of the time’: honorific appellations for the greater Turkish theologian of the 20th c.) did not champion any idea related to the Pan-Islamism or to the so-called Islamic Modernism (two distinct ideological forgeries that were geared by the criminal colonial academia of France and England in order to deceive many gullible and ignorant sheikhs, ideologists and activists, like Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, Muhammad Abduh, Muhammad Rashid Rida, Sayyid Qutb and others).

Said Nursî’s farness from, and rejection of, the aforementioned figures and their ideas and thoughts was due to his strong acquaintance with, and knowledge of, the Ottoman administration, to his affiliation to Pan-Ottomanism, and to his ability to distinguish between

a) imperial-level understanding of the intentions, the targets, the methods and the practices of the colonial powers, and

b) village-level absolute inability to assess colonial countries’ methods, such as political intrigues, psychological manipulations, divisive schemes, machinations geared to trigger self-damaging behavior and reactions to the enemy, and many other types of evil plots (theoretical, academic, scientific, intellectual, educational, behavioral, cultural, ideological, political, economic and other).

In other words, the Constantinopolitan Ottoman theological elite around the Sultan and the Sheikhulislam had certainly failed to oppose the sophisticated plans and plots of the evil colonial empires, but they were still experienced magistrates, who definitely had enough knowledge, wisdom, perspicacity and foresight to identify strengths pulled by foreign powers and to thus avoid falling in ideological and theoretical traps – in striking difference with the aforementioned ignorant sheikhs and ideologists. Having frequented these Ottoman elites, Said Nursî was able to discern accurately at the level of governance, although he missed other capacities and qualifications.

Many Turkish preachers, ideologists, theologians and activists associated themselves with Said Nursî quite often, claiming theoretical vicinity and ideological affiliation; gradually, an entire movement (Nurculuk or Nurcular) was formed and expanded by referring to him, but quite often the references to and mentions of him involved slight or grave distortion of his positions. Then, an avalanche of further falsifications followed and from Said Nursî’s unrealistic ideas back in the middle of the 20th c., we finally, at the end of the century, reached to the very bottom of the shameful alteration, utilization and politicization of the Islamic spirituality,religion, culture and civilization as carried out by many pathetic pseudo-sheikhs and ignorant imams, who soon became the tool of Western countries’ secret services, like the most famous and most pathetic among them, the notorious, villainous and ominous Fethullah Gülen. His secretive and seditious movement (Gülen hareketi) ended up as the well-known and worldwide active, terrorist organization (Fethullahçı Terör Örgütü) that has financed many other dozens of thousands of corrupt and idiotic preachers, when they were not already bribed by the secret services of several Western states. 

The politicization of Islam, as carried out over the past 40 years in Turkey, was a crucial stage of worldwide degradation of the spiritual, mental, intellectual, academic, educational, cultural and religious conditions of all the Muslims of the world. The extent of the degradation was worldwide, because Turkey has always been the de facto leading country and the driving force of the Islamic world. In fact, the groundbreaking measures introduced by Kemal Ataturk in Turkey back in the 1920s should have been progressively accepted and implemented in all the Muslim states, so that they all manage to reach the level Turkey did, and reject the darkness and the obscurantism in which they had been fallen over the past 400 years. But the colonial powers prevented this development in order to maintain control over, and keep exploiting, all the other Muslim countries and the fake leaderships that the Westerners appointed there as local slaves and stooges in the first place. The method that the colonial powers employed to achieve their calamitous targets in their colonies across the Islamic world was precisely the formation of Political Islam (or Islamism), the promotion of the Wahhabi cholera, and the diffusion of the racist bogus ideology of Arab Nationalism.

In this regard, the politicization of Islam in Turkey was a form of late, indirect and covered colonization and barbarization of Turkey that I denounced very early (January 2009):


This phenomenon was not the revivification of the Islamic religion as its demented supporters claimed, being empowered by the evil colonial academics, who composed false and ludicrous terms (like ‘Islamic Revivalism’) in order to obscure the reality and confuse all the people worldwide. In fact, this disastrous phenomenon was the return of Islam’s counterfeit revenant, i.e. the corporeal and mental reconstitution of undead, demoniacally possessed, Muslim zombies that spread terror, darkness and permanent dementia. There is nothing Islamic in any form or branch of the Political Islam (let alone in Wahhabism); when today’s Muslim zombies read the Quran, they understand all major terms in another, erroneous connotation that is diametrically opposed to the perception of the text by true Muslims of the Golden Era of Islamic Civilization. Because this happens to modern times’ Muslim zombies, they are cannot reproduce the Islamic Civilization, precisely because they are not Muslims.

Only Necmettin Erbakan made a honorable exception in this nefarious development. And this is so, because his effort was evidently creative: he composed a totally new, authentic, synthesis (titled ‘Millî Görüş’) made out of traditional Anatolian culture, Muslim moral, Turkish national education, and modern technology & engineering (Erbakan was a mechanical engineer, with a PhD in Engineering from the RWTH Aachen University, and later a university professor in Turkey). Millî Görüş had nothing in common with any branch of Political Islam and, as theoretical system, it was not related to the politicization of Islam or any theological interpretation. It was totally unrelated to religion.

As a matter of fact, Millî Görüş was not a political ideology that utilized religious prescriptions to fanaticize people; it was rather a theoretical socio-cultural and moral system that stressed the need of the Anatolian Turkish society to retain cultural traditions and moral values while economically, technologically and academically coping with Western countries. It consisted in a very conscious and well-thought effort to overwhelmingly reject the post-WWII theoretical, ideological, educational, moral and behavavioral corruption of the Western world, as well as the irreversible putrefaction that characterizes already the Western world. To put it in simple words, Erbakan tried to retain whatever he deemed as constructive and rewarding element of the Western science and technology, while keeping the Anatolian Turkish society intact from the Western moral and socio-behavioral contamination. Toward the Western world in its entirety, Erbakan was so eclectic in the 1970s as Ataturk was in the 1920s.

If thoroughly implemented, Millî Görüş would guarantee economic independence (instead of pathetic Erdogan’s sellout of Turkey’s organizations, companies and cogglomerates to forces of economic globalization), optimized industrialization (instead of worthless Erdogan’s inconsistent economics and unsustainable public debt), and advanced competitiveness in the world markets. Necmettin Erbakan was a most serious threat to the Western plan that provided for Turkey’s colonization via the scheme of Political Islam. The colonial countries’ local stooges, be they generals and colonels or preachers and imams, described Erbakan as ‘Islamist’, whereas he was the last stand of Kemal Ataturk’s paradigm against the either hypocritical or idiotic Kemalists. It is quite indicative: Prof. Necmettin Erbakan never met the miserable, disreputable and vicious enemy of Turkey, Fethullah Gülen.

The politicization of Islam was in fact imposed across Turkey’s politics via systematic intereference of many foreign institutions in Turkey’s military, economic, socio-political life during the 1990s and the 2000s. The local Islamist stooges and puppets of American, English and French politicians, diplomats, military and intelligence officers, academics, and businessmen were not actually the first Turkish servants and lackeys of the Western powers. Historically, these corrupt and treacherous elements constituted the next stage of Western interference in the affairs of the 19th c. ailing Ottoman Empire; when the caliphate was already defunct, they deliberately masqueraded into Kemalists during the period 1918-1924 and survived as part of the new establishment, having at times high positions next to Kemal Ataturk. Their only target was to progressively sabotage Ataturk’s efforts to create an incorruptible and formidable state that would belong to all the people and not to the treacherous, secluded, indoctrinated, pseudo-Islamic elites of silly theologians.

The first traitors of Kemal Ataturk were therefore some hypocritical elements that appeared as supporters and admirers of the founder of Turkey; some of them were even high magistrates belonging to Ataturk’s immediate entourage. These early Kemalists were used by Western diplomats in their effort to destroy the state of Kemal Ataturk, which was – in total contrast with the Western elitist, pseudo-democratic tyrannies – a state that fully reflected a free society of equal nationals with strong cultural-historical identity and moral integrity, and not (as it already happened in the corrupt and useless Western countries) a disunited community made of distinct, mutually in conflict, social classes exploited by criminal, secretively segregated Orders and hierarchical societies. In fact, all the methods that the Turkish Islamists used recently in order to further distort the nature of the state of Kemal Ataturk had already been employed for decades by the Kemalists; the reason is very simple: the guidance was always the same – alien and evil!

Thus, after 2002, many Turkish Islamists progressively started believing that, by means of dissimulation, step-by-step deception, and silly lies said one after the other, they could cheat the Turksh people and promote their pseudo-Islamic doctrine, while also corrupting the masses with a fake socioeconomic improvement and spectacular but unnecessary public works. Despite their encroachment in the government for 18 years (thanks to the failure of the anti-Ataturk Kemalist parties, the existence of paranoid electoral laws, the orchestration of repeated electoral fraud, and the systematic neutralization of vast, non-Islamist masses by means of massive flattery and bribery that took the form of financially disastrous salary increases and numerous other material benefits), the Islamists failed to implement a proper, let alone advanced, Islamization agenda.

If one carefully observes the legislation and the policies implemented over this very long period, one concludes that Turkish Islamists will need 300 years to implement their agenda. Populist rhetoric, half-uttered references to past stories, emotional expression of memories, symbolic gestures, posthumous glorification of failed Islamist ideologists and poets, like Necip Fazıl Kısakürek, lessening of strict secular rules, and commemoration of culturally meaningless, theoretically-educationally misinterpreted, and politically insignificant events, like Alp Arslan’s victory at Malazgirt (Manzikert) in 1071, are not methods to bring the Ottoman Caliphate back. Turning the Ayasofya Museum to a mosque does not bring the Ottoman Empire back; it pushes it farther and farther to the past.

First, they faced steadfast and fierce opposition from the military and the Kemalist opposition (despite the incessant interference of many Western powers in favor of the Islamists); second, they never managed to truly deepen and widen their main electoral basis (the real nucleus of Turkey’s Islamists never went above 20-23%; the rest are not Islamists but mere, provisory voters, who get financial benefits from the long-term disastrous governmental policy); third, they were divided among them (covertly before 2012; overtly between 2012 and 2016; and frontally ever since); and fourth, their necessary alliance with the Pan-Turanianists (after July 2016 and more ostensibly after early 2017) significantly modified their targets and possibilities, forcing them to be more realistic and less agenda-driven.

In fact, 18 years of Islamist governments in Turkey fully prove that Ataturk’s assaulted state and beleaguered heritage demonstrate enormous resistance to all types of destructive efforts. Either Kemalist or Islamist, any dissimulative policy can quantitatively modify and modulate but never qualitatively transfigure and alter the state founded by Kenal Ataturk as per the Qizilbash spirituality and the Bektashi transcendental illumination provided by Rudolf von Sebottendorf. Only a very radical -Islamist, Pan-Turanianist or other- attempt or a revolutionary act could really endanger Turkey and cause the total disappearance of Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. But then, the tectonic movements that would be triggered would not only change the contents and the form of the state but break it to pieces.

Turkey’s Islamists do not have the means to turn Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey to an Islamic state; and they will never acquire them. This is the reason for which there will never be an ‘Islamic Republic of Turkey’, although the venomous serpents of the Foreign Office, the criminals of the Intelligence Service, and the nonsensical, corrupt and villainous English academia would very much rejoice with that perspective.

However, due to the fact that, after 2016, the Islamists do not govern Turkey alone but share power with the Pan-Turanianists leaves minimal space for the English evil hopes to be possibly materialized. The same concerns also the similarly wicked plans of France and America that have been geared long ago in order to bring about the dismemberment and destruction of Turkey. Paris and Washington cannot and will never understand that the state launched only in 1923 by Kemal Ataturk is founded on principles and concepts superior to those proclaimed by their own Founding Fathers and stated in their own constitutions. With the Pan-Turanianists in power at Ankara, with Russia and China as strategic allies of Turkey, and with the ever expanding New Silk Road, it is more plausible that the US and France break down and disintegrate first.

B – The Pan-Turanianists

Many believe that the Islamists have been the main danger for Turkey over the past century; however, this is not quite true. It is only due to a superficial reading of the nature and of the character of the state of Kemal Ataturk, and of its enemies. In reality, the worst, the most perilous, enemies of the Founder of Modern Turkey have always been the Pan-Turanianists, and that’s why Ataturk kept them at distance and out of Turkey. This truth is not easily understood because first, many people make the terrible mistake to consider the Pan-Turanianism as a nationalist movement with a typical nationalist ideology similar to many other, and second, numerous colonial diplomacies, academies, intelligentsias and administrations have done their best to defame, denigrate and demonize the Pan-Turanian ideal. Pan-Turanianism is totally unrelated to any type of nationalism; in fact, it is at the exact antipodes of every nationalism.

It is also essential not to misinterpret the Pan-Turanianists’ familiarity with religious rituals, support for the cause of Islam, and professed Islamic faith; Pan-Turkists and Pan-Turanianists are Muslims. However, they are not strictly and politically religious like the Islamists; on another note, contrarily to the Kemalists, they are not irreligious, agnostics or indifferent to religion.

This is so because every nationalism is a theory, an ideology, and an academic-educational system elaborated to

a) alter (or at times monstrously distort) History (as History saved in original historical sources, i.e. textual evidence and epigraphic material),

b) romanticize numerous figuratively perceived (true or fake) moments of the past,

c) attribute to the ‘nation’ a racial and typically racist character (which is totally unreal and absolutely ahistorical; in total contradiction with all modern ‘nations’, all the various historical nations of the Antiquity and of the Christian-Islamic Ages never perceived themselves racially, but culturally-spiritually), and

d) utilize -within the context of politics (i.e. the modern, tyrannical and inhuman manner of governance)- the average people’s collective and personal sentimentalism (as machinated due to aforementioned points a, b, and c).  

The ultimate targets of every nationalism and of every nationalist regime, establishment, institution, party, etc. are to

i) divert the knowledge, interest, belief and fascination of the masses from the true historical past, from all current issues, and from down-to-earth reality;

ii) direct the knowledge, interest, belief and fascination of the masses toward the prefabricated delusions of a mythical role, an unequivocal vocation, and an ultimate salvation of their (otherwise fake) ‘nation’, and  

iii) exploit politically (either internally or externally) the ensuing situation of mass hypnotization, disorientation from the reality, obscurantism, and fictional existence.

All these fictional delusions are totally unrelated to each nation’s traditional culture and folklore, pre-modern national identity, historical past, textually evidenced historical perceptions of the past, and historically documented conceptualizations of the world/universe. It is therefore evident that every nationalism fabricates a new, previously nonexistent nation that we have to define as ‘political nation’, because the associated efforts originate from the modern system of governance and social organization that is called ‘politics’. In fact, every nationalism is a political ideology.

Every political nation is totally unrelated to the ‘historical nation’ that it had been, prior to the establishment of a modern political regime and to the diffusion of a nationalist ideology; every political nation has no roots in History, and that is why it is gradually cut off from its cultural-spiritual roots, traditions, and folklore.

A historical nation exists only in the past, in what we call ‘History’. A historical nation is real. All ancient nations were true and real; and more importantly, they were accurately perceived as such by all their natives.

A political nation exists only in the present, in what we call ‘mass delusion’ and ‘modern politics’. A political nation is fake; in reality, it does not exist. In modern times, what the masses perceive as ‘nation’ is a nonexistent delusion geared to absorb all the people across the Earth into the maelstrom of politics, the forgery of geo-politics, and the abomination of globalism/globalization. During this ominous process, all nations are transformed from ‘historical nations’ into ‘political nations’, thus totally losing

– their identity (in order to get as substitute a fake one),

– their integrity (in order to disappear among the disorderly pseudo-world of amalgamated pseudo-nations, bogus-cultures, relativized values, and immoral / amoral mindsets and behaviors), and therefore

– their raison d’être (because by historical standards they are not human anymore).

As such, a political nation is predestined to vanish to extinction; this is what we have exactly attested during the 19th and the 20th c., when politics and nationalisms were diffused via colonization; the present phenomenon of globalization is the natural consequence of colonization, politics and nationalisms.

Globalization is not the abnegation of nationalisms, but their continuation; the fake political nations were predestined to be amalgamated within the so-called global melting pot of

1- the politically correct, which is tantamount to morally incorrect,

2- the materialistic social context of industrialization, consumerism, marketing, advertisements, high technology, ceaseless crises, and mind controlling mass media, and

3- the farcical nonsense of the ‘social’ media, which involve the human defacement caused by the contamination called ‘Facebook’ and the human bestialization promoted by the diseases named ‘Google’, ‘Twitter’, MSN, etc.

In fact, only historical nations could successfully oppose, effectively counterbalance, and drastically outmaneuver the present phenomenon of globalization; that’s why they ‘had’ to disappear first.

Pan-Turanianism is not a nationalism because, in most of the cases of a Pan-Turanianist thinker, theoretician, intellectual, ideologist or activist, we don’t attest any effort to produce a political nation out of a historical nation. Furthermore and as I already said, Pan-Turanianism must be categorized at the antipodes of every nationalism; this is so because, instead of re-inventing one nation (i.e. forging a fake, ‘political nation’) and differentiating / distancing it from other nations, Pan-Turanianism tries to bring together and unite several historical nations that have common cultural and folklore background, spiritual-religious affinities, and linguistic – literary similarities. As such, Pan-Turanianism is rather a form of internationalism among all Turanian nations: Anatolian Turks, Azeris, Tatars, Turkmen, Circassians, Chechnyans, Qashqais, Hazaras, Uzbeks, Kyrgyzs, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Chuvashes. Uighurs, Mongoliansm Tuvans, Yakuts, and many others.   

The origins of Pan-Turanianism go certainly back to Mahmud al-Kashgari (Махмуд аль-Кашгари / محمود الكاشغري; 1005-1102), an outstanding scholar of his times, historian, geographer, ethnographer, linguist, lexicographer, mathematician, astronomer, sociologist and historian of religions. Although he mainly lived in Kashgar {in the southwestern confines of Eastern Turkestan, which has been known since 1955 as the ‘Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region’ (شىنجاڭ ئۇيغۇر ئاپتونوم رايونى /新疆维吾尔自治区) of China, because mainly Uighurs and Han Chinese live today in this area that is located in China’s northwestern extremities}, Mahmud al-Kashgari was not an Uighur; his father was a magistrate of the Turanian Afrasiab Empire, which modern historians usually call ‘Kara-Khanid Khanate’. That vast empire controlled most of Central and Northern Asiatic lands from the middle of 9th c. to the beginning of the 13th c. We know that Mahmud al-Kashgari’s family originated from the southeastern coast lands of the Issyk-Kul Lake in today’s Kyrgyzstan, and it is most probable that their origin was Karluk Turanians. Written in Arabic, his famous ‘Compendium of Turanian Languages’ (ديوان لغات الترك‎ / Diwan Lughat al Turk) is an ethno-linguistic, literary, religious, cultural survey, critical commentary and panorama of his times’ Turanian languages, traditions, faiths, history, culture and folklore; this historical treatise provides the very first textual evidence of a common understanding among all Turanian nations.  

The same can be said for Yusuf Balasaguni (Юсуф Баласагуни; known in Arabic as Yusuf Khass Hajib / يوسف خاصّ حاجب; Kyrgyz: Жусуп Баласагын; Kazakh: Жүсіп Баласағұни; 1019-1077), who was born in today’s Northern Kyrgystan and lived within the vast Afrasiab Empire (the Kara-Khanid Khanate). He was a great thinker, erudite scholar, poet, and statesman, who evidently realized the need for a unity among all Muslim Turanians, and this is extensively evidenced in his ‘Kutadgu Bilig’ (‘Blessed Knowledge’), which is the first entire book (saved down to our times) written in a Turanian language (namely in Kara-Khanid, through use of Farsi characters).

These early Pan-Turanian movements were intermingled with Islam; however, as the unprecedented and ever since unequaled conquests of Genghiz Khan (1158-1227) demonstrate, within the aureole of the Pan-Turanian circumference either Tengrism (which is a real religion in contrast with ‘Shamanism’, which is a Western projection and reconstruction) or Islam can easily be accommodated. However, there is an enormous historical obstacle to every Pan-Turanian concept, vision, theory or wish; the opposition between the Western and the Eastern Turanians has always been a determinant and almost permanent trait of all internal Turanian strives, conflicts and wars. Two calamitously sinister and apparently permanent characteristics seem to have always been inherent in the character, mentality and world conceptualization of almost all great Turanian emperors, conquerors, khaqans, shahs and sultans:

a) the deep polarization between nomadic and semi-nomadic or sedentary populations

{The Turanian nomads viewed always the sedentary Turanians as weaker, degraded, and fallen -if not even effeminate- people. Eastern Turanians viewed always as human shame the fact that Turanian tribes that moved to the West (in Central Asia) and to the South (China) preferred to abandon their nomadic life and to settle in various locations, building homes and becoming sedentary. This was not a matter of simple belief but of actual practice; when hundreds of years later, some Eastern Turanians raided in the West and found other Turanian tribes that had left Northeast Asia and settled in Central Asia, they treated them as slaves and did not spare their lives}, and

b) the customary division of an empire, khaqanate, sultanate, emirate, etc. among the ruler’s sons, who quarreled among themselves in extremis.

{Entire families went extinct because of the incessant fights among the brothers, the sons, the grandsons, the nephews, and the grandnephews of Turanian emperors, khaqans, sultans, khans, emirs, etc.; and along with them, entire empires collapsed and disappeared. Among the decayed Turkmen Ottomans family members, the assassination of a crown prince’s brothers was almost institutionalized in order to prevent younger brothers from eventually becoming a threat in the indefinite future.}

In Modern Times, the father of Pan-Turanianism is the Turkmen Magtymguly Pyragy (Махтумкули; Farsi: مختومقلی فراغی; Turkish: Mahtumkulu Firaki; 1724-1807). The father of Turkmen literature was a great mystic of the Naqshbandi Order, a multilingual poet, a rich conceptual thinker, an erudite scholar, and an unsurpassed traveler (from the Mughal Empire to the Ottoman Empire and across Central and Northern Asia). He expressed severe criticism for the divisions among Turanian nations and called for unity against foreign assaults that he was able to plainly document through his interminable travels. His social-cultural vision for a United Turan encompasses the cultural wealth, the linguistic affinities, the Muslim moral and spirituality, and the traditional system of social organization and governance of the Turanian nations. In his approach, there is no theological utilitarianism, no religious sectarianism, no ethnic racialism, no societal evolutionism, no governmental functionalism, no political-‘democratic’ delusionism, and no academic-intellectual elitism.

Magtymguly was a startling universalist, a fascinating symbolist, and a foremost transcendentalist; he must have appeared as the most unrealistic sage of his time, but in reality, he showed clearly to his innumerable readers across all Turanian lands that a conscious nation proud for the wealth of their folklore, the authenticity of their traditions, the clarity of their spirituality, and the strength of their virtues can be instituted as an infinite empire even without an emperor, if the selfishness of the various incompetent leaders and the introversion of a deliberately misled society are averted. For Magtymguly, a ‘nation’ is clearly a cultural entity with common ancestry, traditions, faith and language; Turan is therefore a constellation of many nations revolving around the same constituent elements. Some of Magtymguly poems must have certainly offered to Kemal Ataturk a great opportunity for prodigious reflection in his youth.

One century after Magtymguly passed away, a totally different environment had been formed across Asia due to the advance of the colonial powers (England, France, Holland and Russia). The diffusion of politics as a new but disastrous form of governance, the propagation of a wide range of political ideologies, the spread of numerous, sketchy nationalisms (hastily drafted mainly by foreign students of French and English academic seminars and Freemasonic lodges), the assault of the Western powers on the Sultans, the Shahs, the Gurkanian (: Great Mongols or Mughal), the Tianzi (天子, i.e. ‘Son of Heaven’, namely the Great Qing monarchs), the Czars, and the Kaisers, and the politicization of the religions formed a totally different and absolutely confusing environment. Misguided by this new milieu, many Turanians from the Balkans & Central Europe to North Africa to Central & Northeastern Asia started elaborating ways of national affirmation within the wider political, republican context.

Although the Western colonial capitals were ferocious and determined enemies of any perspective of a rising Turan across Asia and despite the ceaseless efforts of colonial academics and Orientalists to undermine and conceal all things Turanian, Paris and London agreed that a small dose of Pan-Turkism (diffused among Turkic peoples, i.e. only a part of the Turanian nations) would further destabilize both, the Ottoman Empire (the principal target of the colonial powers) and Czarist Russia (France’s and England’s most expendable ‘ally’). The Pan-Turkist and Pan-Turanian movements that initially started with Western help were predestined to fail pretty much like every other movement, party or state that was formed with Western colonial ‘assistance’. In fact, there were only few exceptions to this rule. The most impressive among them was Abdurreshid Ibrahim (Абдурашид Гумерович Ибрагимов; Turkish: Abdürreşid İbrahim; 1857-1944), an outstanding Tatar thinker, theologian, preacher, theoretician, activist, agitator, author, publisher of newspapers, reviews and magazines, founder of liberation movements, ambitious liberator and unifier of all Turanian nations, and adamant fighter for the cause of Pan-Turanian Muslim unity.

Unique personality of uncompromising discipline, foremost persistence, exemplary adaptation in different enironments, and paradigmatic readjustment under varied political conjunctures, Abdurreshid Ibrahim was born in Tara, a town then located in Tobolsk province, but currently incorporated in the province of Omsk in Western Siberia (Russia). Indefatigable traveler for the promotion of his cause, he pleaded for his vision almost everywhere between Tokyo and Istanbul, traveling perhaps more than any other explorer, military, intelligence agent, diplomat, entrepreneur or scholar of his time (from Japan to Italy to France – from NE Siberia to Mecca to Egypt). Risky adventurer, persuasive orator, and alternative visioner for almost all of his diverse interlocutors, Abdurreshid Ibrahim was able to explain why Pan-Turanian Muslim unity was useful to almost anyone except the colonial powers he was fighting against (namely Russia, England and France). Minor sample of his strong conviction and of his unmatched persuasion skills is the fact that, amongst other extraordinary circumstances of his fascinating life, he became the first imam of the first Tokyo mosque.

Abdurreshid Ibrahim had a very accurate and unbiased knowledge of Islamic and Asiatic History, particularly about the wider continent of Asia, which is now called ‘Eurasia’ by both, colonial forces whose constant preoccupation has always been to deceive all the others, and confused theoreticians whose ability to discern has evidently been insufficient to grasp that, during most of the last six millennia of History, Europe has permanently been the most underdeveloped, the most backward, the most barbarian, and the most useless peninsula of Asia.

Although not a traditional Muslim historian like Tabari, although not a traditional Muslim theoretician of governmental systems like Nizam al Mulk, although not a traditional Muslim conqueror like Timur, the self-instructed (thanks to his interminable travels) Abdurreshid Ibrahim had sufficient knowledge, perspicacity, and contextualization skills to conclude that     

a) Russia was a fake state, which not only subjugated an enormous swath of Muslim populations, illegally occupying their vast lands, but also -and during no less than 400 consecutive years- subjected millions of people to enforced Christianization and Russification under threat of mass extermination;

b) the English colony of ‘India’ (British Raj) was the result of an illegal foreign occupation and constituted a criminal, anti-Turanian and anti-Muslim tyranny geared to monstrously deface the Turanian Muslim identity of Hindustan, Bengal and the Deccan, impose a revisionist pseudo-historical dogma, and produce a pseudo-Indian political nation through numerous terrorist processes, like the infamous Sanskritization campaign;  

c) Japan and China were in reality parts of the Turanian world;

d) Shintoism and Confucianism consisted in earlier forms of monotheism similar to Tengrism; and

e) Iran and Turan were one ethnolinguistic, cultural and spiritual entity that incorporated nomadic, semi-nomadic and sedentary populations under the universal concept of a divine empire that was not different from similar conceptualizations attested in China.

Abdurreshid Ibrahim was neither a Pan-Islamist nor a modernist reformer (Jedid), as many colonial academics pretend today, thus fully distorting his vision and efforts; simply, it was an undeniable fact that the majority of the Turanians outside China and Japan were Muslims and those, who did not believe in Islam, ascribed themselves to forms of monotheistic spirituality that did not diverge much from the basic tenants of Islamic monotheism. Although an imam, he was not a rigid and strict theologian, because his incessant travels acquainted him with the multiple forms of perception and expression of the monotheistic spirituality.

He deployed his efforts not only at the level of popularizing his ideas and concepts among Muslims in Asia, Africa and Europe, but also by attempting to turn Japan, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Tibet, the Dalai Lama and the Buddhists, the Bogd Khanate of Mongolia, and the Ottoman Empre against Russia, England and France. He was able to extensively explain to each of them their respective interests in opposing the three colonial states, as well as the ensuing benefits for all of them. In parallel, he incited all the Turanians and all the Muslims exposed to European colonization threat against Russia, England and France. He was arrested many times and even more times, he was expelled from countries that he tried to turn against the colonial powers.

One has to admit however that, despite his unporecedented and ever since unrivelled zeal, Abdurreshid Ibrahim failed to achieve a substantive result. The reason for this is the fact that he basically acted without any proper, collective infrastructure, i.e. a movement, an organization, a front or an association. Actually, he needed what we would call today an international party. He did not realize the advantages deriving from the existence of various local nuclei of social activism and propaganda and from the organization of particular groups that would continue diffusing and popularizing his concepts, proposals, ideas, and vision, when he would not be anymore in that specific region or country, traveling to other locations and empires.

Abdurreshid Ibrahim was already expelled from the Ottoman Empire before the Young Turk Revolution (1908). As he was moving fast across vast distances, he returned to Istanbul at the time the Young Turks (Committee of Union and Progress) rose to power; he appeared as a most interesting thinker, thoughtful activist, and formidable agitator to the leading statesmen among the Young Turks, and they increasingly paid great attention to him, and to his proposals, calls and vision. His book ‘Alem-i-İslam ve Japonya’da İntişar-ı İslamiyet’ found many enthusiastic supporters among the Young Turks, who were trying to build lobbies of influence and to produce the necessary tools for their policies in various parts of the world. Many consider Enver Pasha (1881-1922) as the leading figure of Pan-Turkism, but there had not been a single seed of Pan-Turkism or Pan-Turanianism among the Young Turks prior to 1910.

It was only a proof of deep ignorance, shameless ingratitude, and pathetic populism from the part of the worthless and pathetic Turkish president that, during his a two-day visit in Azerbaijan (on December 9th 2020), while addressing the people of Azerbaijan, he praised Enver Pasha by saying “May the soul of Enver Pasha be blessed today” ( In fact, and irrespective of whatever Enver Pasha’s soul may or may not be doing now, without Abdurreshid Ibrahim’s earlier propagated vision, manifested struggle, and numerous publications, speeches, pleas, and calls, Enver Pasha would have not be remembered as a champion of Pan-Turkism nowadays, and even his Caucasus campaign may have not taken place.

Enver Pasha’s gradual change and shift of position from a nebulous Ottoman Modernism to an ill-defined Pan-Turkism is entirely due to Abdurreshid Ibrahim. This shift caused the rift between Enver Pasha and Mustafa Kemal Pasha, who then (early 1912) started taking an always greater distance from the Young Turks. It is however true that, at those days, due to the multifaceted colonial assault on the Islamic World and the Asiatic empires, there seemed to be a certain propinquity among many activists with divergent ideals and beliefs. In fact, to some extent, Pan-Turkism (and Pan-Turanianism), Pan-Ottomanism and Pan-Islamism functioned at the time as communicating vessels of the anti-colonial forces, because the major concern and interest was not the establishment and the nature of a future state, but the immediate and effective repulsion of foreign attacks. As one could have expected, Abdurreshid Ibrahim was shrewd enough to understand that fake constructions, like Wahhabism and Political Islam, were mere vehicles of colonial policies and to reject them.

Abdurreshid Ibrahim fought againt the Italians in Libya, got Ottoman citizenship, became a leading member of Teşkilât-ı Mahsusa special forces, published the legendary newspaper İslam Dünyası, was appointed as close associate of Enver Pasha, and, although 60 years old, was engaged in the Ottoman front against the English at Basra, Southern Mesopotamia. In 1917, he was in Berlin to better forge a Tatar-Muslim-German alliance, whereas in 1918, he was an ally of the Communist forces in Russia. Soon afterwards, he was considered as a counter-revolutionary element, and this forced him to move back to Turkey and to Arabia. For Kemal Ataturk’s systematic approach and methodic effort to launch a new, solid, strong, and well-organized state, Abdurreshid Ibrahim did not represent an enemy but a risk. The same was valid for Enver Pasha, who was not even accepted back in Turkey, when he reached Batumi and tried to return to the state of Kemal Ataturk, which was still under formation. In 1935, Abdurreshid Ibrahim was deprived of his Turkish citizenship, and he returned to Central Asia, China and Japan, deploying there further efforts for his cause for another decade.

Contrarily to Enver Pasha, his half brother Nuri Killigil (1869-1949) lived in Turkey, after participating in many battles; he was a former general of the Ottoman army, leading officer of the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa forces against the Italians in Libya and the English in Egypt during WWI. His major achievement is that, as the main recruiter and the sole commander of the Islamic Army of the Caucasus (Kafkas İslâm Ordusu; Azerbaijani: Qafqaz İslam Ordusu), he fought against the Communist (Bolshevik Baku Commune) and Armenian army and he liberated Azerbaijan in September 1918, before being forced to withdraw after the capitulation of the Ottoman Empire at Mudros (Armistice of Mudros; Mondros Mütarekesi). Although arrested by the English in 1919 Batumi, Nuri Killigil escaped to Erzurum with the help of his supporters and lived in Turkey where he established a rather small private business and abstained from any other activity.

Nuri Killigil remained however a dormant champion of Pan-Turkism for two decades, and after Ataturk’s death, he launched a military industrial plant. In 1941, he negotiated with Franz von Papen (Knight of Malta;  Grand Cross of the Pontifical Order of Pius IX; 1879-1969), Germany’s ambassador in Ankara, the participation of Turkic and Turanian forces in the WWII at the side of the Germans, demanding in exchange the secession and independence of Turkestan (i.e. the entire Central Asia, Caucasus, sizeable parts of Siberia, and an important portion of European Russian territories). Thanks to his initiative and cooperation with von Papen, Nuri Killigil helped establish the Turkistanische Legion (Turkestan Legion) that coordinated actions with the Schutzstaffel (SS). After the end of WWII, English agents carried out a sabotage in his factory (in Istanbul’s Sütlüce district), assassinating him and many employees and workers. However, the Turkistanische Legion became a historically remarkable Treffpunkt of leading figures of Pan-Turkism and Pan-Turanianism, notably the Kazakh Mustafa Shokay (Мустафа Шокай; 1890-1941) and the Uzbek Baymirza Hayit (Boymirza Hayit Mahmudmirza o’g’li; Баймирза Хаит; 1917-2006).

For Kemal Ataturk, Pan-Turkism (and/or Pan-Turanianism) was not something inherently bad or necessarily pointless; but it was simply wrong under the then circumstances that prevailed from Western Balkans to India to Eastern Siberia. The timing for such an attempt was disastrous. According to Ataturk, attempts like the Basmachi movement in Central Asia (Basmacı hareketi; Басмачество; its peak was from November 1921 until August 1922, and under the leadership of Enver Pasha) were brave, heroic, and noble, but they were predestined to doom.

If we study the opposition between Kemal Ataturk from one side and from the other side all the tenants of Pan-Turkism and Pan-Turanianism, we will find an interesting parallel with another polarization that took place at those days within the sphere of Marxism–Leninism, namely the opposition between the doctrinal concept and theory of “socialism in a single country” (социализм в отдельно взятой стране) defended by Stalin and Bukharin in 1924 and the rather erratic idea of a permanent revolution, which -although insinuated by Marx and Engels- was propagated in the 1910s, 1920s and 1930s by Trotsky. It is the typical difference that we attest on many different occasions and about diverse issues; we commonly describe it as the divide between the two groups: “realists vs. idealists”.

Ziya Gökalp (1876-1924), an insignificant theoretician guided and ‘educated’ by French Orientalists in order to be locally used as per the needs of the colonial powers, is the enfant gâté of Western scholarship, when it comes to almost all things Oriental. Among other Western colonial falsifications, exaggerated flatteries, and nonsensical claims, he is portrayed as an important intellectual with a certain impact on the formation and the formulation of Pan-Turkic and Pan-Turanian ideas. That’s a lie. Ziya Gökalp was a Turk from Diyarbakır, who settled in Istanbul in 1895, and then, while studying, he was initiated in French Freemasonic lodges of the Ottoman capital. There, he received a most confusing and absolutely fallacious education meant to convert him to a tool for the promotion of catastrophic French theories, ideas, and ideologies in both, the Ottoman Empire and Turkey.

It was consequently normal for Ziya Gökalp to take strong positions against Pan-Ottomanism and Pan-Islamism. Attracted to and confused by different Western theoretical systems, he was practically unable to correctly perceive realities, whereas his attitude to ceaselessly theorize and to link his understanding of diverse situations to various Western pseudo-scientific dogmas and ideological aberrations led him to an impasse. In fact, Ziya Gökalp cannot be possibly considered either as an adept of Pan-Turkism and Pan-Turanianism or as a champion of Turkish nationalism and Turkism. As he was quite noticeable as a pro-French propagandist in the Orient, the English had to interfere, because Gökalp’s attraction to theories of the French Jew sociologist Émile Durkheim and to ideas of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche did not bode well for their plans in the wider region; he was then exiled to Malta (1919-1921).

Kemal Ataturk realized that Gökalp would be dangerous if left alone, due to the ideological confusion that characterized him, To keep the devil close (and thus render him harmless), the founder of Modern Turkey appointed Gökalp in the Ministry of Education in 1922 and guided him as to how to best define the Anatolian Turkish cultural identity of the Turkish nation. The points included in Gökalp’s ‘Principles of Turkism’ (Türkçülüğün esaslari; 1923) reflect the determinant role that Ataturk played at the definition phase of Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. Gökalp was also elected in the Grand National Assembly, participated in the drafting of the 1923 Constitution, and contributed greatly to the monumental educational reform that Ataturk launched in 1923-1924. Presented by many anti-Turkish Western racists, chauvinists and white supremacists as “Kurd”, Ziya Gökalp constitutes one of the many existing examples that the “Kurds” (at this point I am referring only to the Kurmanji) are in reality “Turks of the mountains” (dağların Türkleri). Contrarily to Anglo-French Freemasonic and to American Zionist propaganda, this term does not express ‘denial of separate identity’ but ‘declaration of true identity’.

The case of Alparslan Türkeş, who participated in several right wing political parties before launching his Nationalist Movement Party (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi; MHP), demonstrates only the degree of the interference of the British Intelligence in Turkey during the 1960s-1990s. This party became the vehicle of an ill-fated, semi-covered, and poorly conceived Pan-Turkism, and it was disastrously patented as a typical Wedtern nationalist party, because any explicit reference to Pan-Turkism or Pan-Turanianism would trigger immediate and drastic reaction from the military. In fact, the Cypriot Alparslan Türkeş was hired by the English colonials to help them control, within the political spectrum of post-Ataturk Turkey, an entire political-ideological sector that they considered as dangerous for their interests in Turkey. This means that, if other major powers controlled this ideological-sociopolitical sector in Turkey and diffused through a political party various ideas, theories and approaches harmful for the English interests across Asia, the extent of disaster for the colonial schemes of England would considerable. This point must be taken seriously into consideration.

Unfortunately for the English and for the otherwise useless politician and founder of MHP, his extremist rhetoric revealed only the emptiness of his party’s ideology and the ineffectiveness of his Bozkurtlar (Grey Wolves) youth organization’s political action over several decades. Then, Alparslan Türkeş’ immediate successor at the party leadership, Devlet Bahceli, gradually eliminated all English stooges and the pro-English elements from the party, thus opening the path for a most determined anti-Western stance of MHP. Several Turkish military officers (previously thought to be Kemalist and pro-Western) became then members of the party only to prove how greatly beneficial for the interests of China MHP can be, particularly if in Turkey’s parliament the Islamists do not form the majority.

Pan-Turanianists in Turkey were catapulted to power in July 2016, due to the failure of the coup of their pro-Western Islamist rivals. Some events possess an inherent symbolism: on Wednesday, 28 September 2016, funeral rites were performed for Nuri Killigil (also known as Nuri Pasha) at Edirnekapı Martyrs Cemetery in Istanbul for the first time, no less than 67 years after his assassoination. In 1949, intensively pressurized by English diplomats and self-motivated against all champions of Pan-Turkism and/or Pan-Turanianism, the Turkish Kemalist government of Mehmet Şemsettin Günaltay ordered Turkey’s leading religious authority to issue a ruling as per which Killigil was buried without the traditional Islamic funeral rituals because his body was dismembered in the explosion. Rectifying a past ‘mistake’ (or simply taking revenge against a ‘wrongdoing’ perpetrated by political opponents before almost seven decades, shows clearly that the Pan-Turanianist agenda was in full motion already only two months after the failed coup of 15 July 2016,

C – The Kemalists

Kemal Ataturk was not a Kemalist, and he never asked anyone to be. As already described quite sufficiently in previous units, the founder of Modern Turkey did not elaborate any theory or ideology; and he never demanded from anyone among his associates, friends, and assistants to compose any. Societies do not need theories composed by irrelevant individuals to prosper and survive. States do not need ideologies to be established, developed and improved. Governments do not need philosophical systems to opt for the correct decision and to act drastically and effectively.

Societies can radiate and expand or regress and disappear due to the creative (or destructive) initiative of their members; societies’ welfare hinges on moral principles and virtues, cultural integrity, knowledge, wisdom, inventiveness, productivity, and solidarity.

States can thrive and triumph or decline and vanish because of the skills of their elites to comprehensively perceive the world, the ability of their rulers to creatively conceptualize the universe, the capability of their spiritual masters to inculcate the entire nation with the true meaning of their identity and the particular values of their culture, and the talent of their military in terms of proper contextualization (balance of power), foe identification, and threat prediction and elimination.

Governments can succeed and excel or fail and fall thanks to the accuracy of their assessments, the realism of their purposes, the effectiveness of their targets, the alternative approaches that they develop, the innovative methods that they employ, and the inventive tactics that they implement.

The above is enough to explain why Kemal Ataturk was always unrelated to theories, political ideologies, any worthless intellectualism, and every attempt to locally institute a cult of personality (in striking contrast with inferior rulers like Stalin, Mao, Hitler and others). The founder of Modern Turkey was a practical and effective ruler, and as such he was a simple person with no complexes of inferiority and no other detrimental psychological problems and anomalies like those that characterize many contemporary politicians and statesmen. Quite unfortunately, as it happened many times throughout History, several people around him did not have his dedication, commitment, courage and zeal; they paid only lip service to his instructions and did not follow his outstanding example. They were close to him not because they wanted to offer their lives for the national salvation and advance of Anatolia, but due to utilitarian calculations and to material benefits that they intended to extract.

In few cases, around Kemal Ataturk, there were also agents of the English and the French secret services; they reported to their masters insightful details, they were guided by the colonial powers in their steps, and they acted in many different ways in order to gradually divert the newly established state from its orbit, modify the fundamental concepts stipulated within the 1923 Constitution, and reduce Turkey to a mere tool of the colonial powers’ plans. For this to do, these agents, who were disguised as passionate admirers and followers of Ataturk, carried out a low intensity sabotage that lasted for long.

The basic colonial plan providing for the destruction of the entire Islamic World included also methods related to the following:

1- exploitation of the religious feelings up to turning the believers to narrow-minded idiots,

2- diffusion of bogus-Islamic theological systems that mentally incapacitate those who believe them,

3- promotion of pseudo-religious obscurantism that makes the people disregard -if not disrespect- other cultures, systems of spirituality, literatures, religions, arts and civilizations,

4- encouragement of abject ignorance, which is a guarantee that the targeted nation will be divided, plunged into civil wars, and incapacitated to cope with the world’s leading powers,

5- stimulation of vicious disregard for Turkey’s new, secular educational system, which should have been copied and implemented across all Muslim nations,

6- incitement of hatred against the secular state, whereas all Muslim nations should be organized in secular states,

7- exhortation for opposition against the authorities, whereas all Muslims, and all nations across Asia, Africa and Latin America must be educated, prepared and predetermined to destroy the colonial states and take revenge for the Crimes against the Mankind that were perpetrated during the colonial era and the post-colonial (or neo-colonial) times,

8- inspiration of accentuated religious division among Muslims, and

9- cultivation of disrepesct for Kemal Ataturk, etc.; the last five methods constitute an unprecedented discharge of venom that turns every unconscious recipients not only to fake Muslims and hypocrites but to inhuman beasts that have no place on Earth.

It would not be however strange to attest similar practices and policies in the territories of France and England in Africa and Asia, because the colonial gangsters did their best to spread barbarism and hatred from India to Egypt to Algeria. But it is impressive to notice that in Turkey, even at the time of Kemal Ataturk, several people among his associates and followers carried out some of the above methods in a clandestine manner, being confident that their colonial masters would later promote them to high positions in the government.  

This is the way all the so-called ‘revolts’ commenced in Kemal Ataturk’s Turkey; initially these events were nothing more than simple protests, which were due to the fact that the groundbreaking changes introduced by the founder of Turkey were not duly explained, extensively discussed, systematically propagated or -if you prefer- effectively marketed among vast populations that could not understand the essence of, and the need for, these changes. After the early stage of these demonstrations, when high dignitaries of the state were dispatched to villages, towns, and cities in Eastern Anatolia, the situation turned worse, because some of these officials were in reality agents of the colonial powers and deliberately worsened the troubles, causing havoc and bloodshed in an effort to shake the state of Kemal Ataturk from its foundations.

A typical example a similar state dignitary was the pathetic crypto-Islamist, disreputable traitor, and agent of the British Intelligence, İhsan Sabri Çağlayangil (1908-1993), former Minister of Foreign Affairs, President of the Senate, and Acting President of Turkey for five months in 1980 (before being overthrown – thank God – by the military coup of General Kenan Evren). There were several people like him back in the late 20s and early 30s; idiotic Muslim conservatives, so-called Sunni laymen, they hated Kemal Ataturk just ‘because he abolished the Caliphate’. They were unable to understand that, with the gradual collapse and the advanced decomposition of the Ottoman Empire over the period 1798-1923, the term “Islamic Caliphate” had already become -in and by itself- a synonym to “parody”, “misery”, “failure”, and “disgrace”.

Even before Kemal Ataturk abolished it, the Islamic Caliphate was the World History’s perfect example to avoid, i.e. the epitome of the most disastrous dereliction. These useless ‘Sunni’ conservative idiots were unable to understand the word ‘self-criticism’ in any language across the Earth. Consequently, they were easily recruited by the Istanbul-based agents of the English and French colonials, who -by means of flattery, bribery and false promises- employed them against Turkey and Kemal Ataturk. They were customarily instructed to publicly appear as pro-Ataturk, to become CHP party members, and to pretend to serve the cause of the secular state, while in reality they were continually instructed as to how to erode it from inside.

Çağlayangil, at the age of 29, was a low level official dispatched to Tunceli (then Dersim) with the task to supervise the trial of Seyit Riza (1863-1937), a Zaza Alevi imam, who protested against various omissions in the new manuals of History and other cultural-educational issues. Seyit Riza was personally known to Kemal Ataturk, whom he had met and discussed with. Contrarily to the unspeakable lies contained with the purposefully fallacious Western colonial bibliography, the Dersim protests did not have any national/ethnic character, and all the Zaza believed that they were Turks, which is actually the historical truth. What was at stake then was a matter of spiritual, cultural and educational nature. It was not an ethnic conflict at all.

The Dersim protesters demanded a more stressed presentation of the Anatolian Alevi culture within the historical manuals of the Turkish secular education. These demands exacerbated the rancor of the filthy crypto-Sunni traitors, the puppets and spies of the colonial powers, who used to posture as ‘Kemalists’ at those days. In this manner, the old Sunni theological odium against the Anatolian Spirituality and the Mevlevi and Bektashi Orders was rekindled. However, these two spiritual orders were already outlawed and banned by Kemal Ataturk, because they had already been infiltrated by evil theologians, gone astray, and become pointless, ineffective and worthless.

Although the vicious murderer Çağlayangil had the power to offer rightful guidance to the judges and to explain to them the reasons for which the evidently innocent imam Seyit Riza had to be acquitted and the whole issue had to be peacefully terminated, he deliberately forced them to condemn him to death. In this manner, the crypto-Sunni criminal Çağlayangil had Seyit Riza hanged, because his colonial masters wanted much blood to be shed, so that they can reactivate all sorts of sectarian divisions in Turkey anytime they would choose as per their interests.

After Ataturk’s death, Çağlayangil shamelessly continued comfortably posturing as ‘Kemalist’, which is of course a disgrace for Modern Turkey, but in Anatolia he is irrevocably remembered until today as the ‘malignant executor’ and the ‘Dersim butcher’.

In fact, the so-called Kemalists appeared as such only to stage manage the hijack and the holdup of the state of Kemal Ataturk. It was not a military coup, but a theatrical play staged after the death of Kemal Ataturk and interpreted by his vicious and venomous enemies, who had been earlier masqueraded as his associates, assistants and followers. The Anglophile pseudo-Freemason İsmet İnönü was the first among them; his catastrophic tenure (1938-1950) served only the English interests, and he was good enough only to materialize the three primary colonial targets:  

a) turn the unitary, solidary, and monolithic society of Turkey, which was organized on the basis of a one-party system (CHP), and the equitable and magnificent state of Kemal Ataturk into a Western political swamp, a monstrous ‘democratic’ tyranny, and a multi-party elite dissociated from the average people;

b) keep Turkey out of WWII as a neutral partner of England and the US – at the detriment of Turkey’s interests in Caucasus, Iran, Central Asia, and all the previously Ottoman territories. This policy did not have catastrophic consequences only for Turkey, but also for the wider region, and the entire world; and

c) prepare the terrain for the first Islamist ‘product’ of the West, i.e. the execrable and perverse crypto-Islamist Adnan Menderes, who became prime minister of Turkey only after being helped by İnönü, subsidized by Western stooges in Turkey, and promoted by the Western embassies.

Menderes’ primary task (ordered by his Western masters) was to dismantle the state of Kemal Ataturk. The fact that he signed Turkey’s entry to NATO (18/2/1952), thus abandoning Turkey’s neutrality, which had been the cornerstone of the state’s foreign policy for more than three decades, demonstrates very clearly that all Islamists are products of the colonial powers and traitors of their own countries. The shameful and treacherous Menderes worked hard for ten years in order to destroy the pillars of Turkey’s national independence, preparing Ankara for full American tutelage. Thank God, he was overthrown by a military coup d’état (27 May 1960) undertaken by young officers who had not been contaminated like most of the Turkish generals due to their contacts with NATO, English and US officers. However, the problem is that the treacherous policies introduced by İsmet İnönü and pursued by Menderes left deep traces in Turkey’s political life.

From the 1960s to the early 2000s, the tragicomical play of Kemalism was staged incessantly in full disrespect of Kemal Ataturk’s legacy and memory; some Kemalists would appear as conservative under Süleyman Demirel, an anti-American puppet of the English colonials, whereas others would propagate social democratic ideas under Bülent Ecevit, an American stooge, balanced politician, and intellectual with strong background in Bengali and Sanskrit. Both tendencies had nothing in common with the typical practices, approaches and perceptions of the founder of Modern Turkey; the former group was at the antipodes of Kemal Ataturk’s Devrimcilik (Reformism; also defined as inkılapçılık), whereas the latter promoted an enormous distortion of Kemal Ataturk’s Devletçilik, which does not imply ‘statism’ and ‘state-run economy’ but underscores the role of the state in promoting and guaranteeing modernization, economic sanitization, and free market economy.

Carrying out, step-by-step, the worst distortion of Kemal Ataturk’s heritage for more than four decades, Kemalists reflect Shakespeare’s following verses better than anybody else in the world, thus revealing what they truly are: 

“the best actors in the world, either for tragedy, comedy, history, pastoral, pastoral-comical, historical-pastoral, tragical-historical, tragical-comical-historical-pastoral, scene individable, or poem unlimited. Seneca cannot be too heavy, nor Plautus too light. For the law of writ and the liberty, these are the only men”

Hamlet: Act 2 Scene 2

The decades-long theatrical play involved also a most decorous scene: portraits, busts and statues of Kemal Ataturk started being placed everywhere. This is actually the way I, personally, came to understand that ‘Kemalism’ and ‘Kemalists’ for Turkey’s ruling classes meant simply “ruling in the name of Kemal Ataturk, while implementing coincidentally opportune policies that have nothing in common with the perceptions, the approaches, the methods, and the practices demonstrated by the founder of Turkey”.

I must confess that -thank God- I realized this troublesome situation very early, and more precisely in 1974, when I was just 18 years old; it was all due to my persistence to invite my father to the cinema so that we watch the famous Murder on the Orient Express, which was directed by Sidney Lumet and featured an exceptional, all-star crew. As my father preferred Maurice Leblanc’s Arsène Lupin to Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot as novel character, my only chance to convince him to come with me was the superb presence in the movie of his beloved Ingrid Bergman. Istanbul is an important setting in the early part of the movie, and several scenes were shot in the Sirkeci Railway station (built in 1890), which -back in the 1930s (when the novel plot is set)- was the eastern terminus of the Orient Express.  

My father was quick to understand that the filmmakers made several mistakes; in one shot, an enormous portrait of Kemal Ataturk appears on a wall. My father, who lived in Turkey during the major part of Ataturk’s tenure, laughed regrettingly and made a negative comment, stating that there were no portraits of the founder of Modern Turkey in Turkey while he was alive. Apparently, this was a major mistake of the film’s set designer. This can be easily noticed in this part of the movie: 12:19-12:22 (2:01:56); you can watch it here:

And this concludes the case of the Kemalists, who for many decades attempted to merge to good and the evil, and to combine virtue and depravity; their ‘Kemal Ataturk’ was therefore a caricature of Oriental pompous arrangments and Occidental hypocritical backstage. When the conservative and social-democrat Kemalists were divided, each into two parties, back in the early 1990s, many -even highly placed magistrates and military officers- believed that these divisions were due to personal feuds; they were all wrong. There was no personal antagonism; there was Western (US, English, French, and German) interference, manipulation and machination.

In 1995, there was absolutely no difference between Tansu Çiller (Doğru Yol Partisi; True Path Party – 19.18%) and Mesut Yılmaz (Anavatan Partisi; Motherland Party – 19.65%); and Bülent Ecevit (Demokratik Sol Partisi; Democratic Left Party – 14.64%) and Deniz Baykal (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi; Republican People’s Party – 10.71%) did not differ in anything. The two conservative parties had together 39% of the voters; and the two social-democratic parties together accounted for 25% of the voters. Refah Partisi (Necmettin Erbakan’s party) was first with only 21.38%. Only because of the electroral law, two parties (Refah Partisi and Doğru Yol Partisi) totaling 40.5% of the voters formed a majority government that was rejected by the parliamentarians of three parties (Anavatan Partisi, Demokratik Sol Partisi, and Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi) supported by 45% of the voters. It appeared as the total oxymoron, but it was carefully planned – by the criminal gangsters of US, NATO, England and France.

One must confess that, in the euphoria of those days, few people were shrewd enough to realize that the end was very close, and that to prevent the end from coming, Kemal Ataturk’s principles had to immediately and solemnly be restated, his values reinstated, and his practices reinvigorated. However, these people were persecuted, defamed, and kicked out, following the intervention of several Western ambassadors, consuls, and intelligence service agents; even Lady Diana’s murder organizers were involved in that story. These people however knew very well that there were no conservatism and no social democracy in Ataturk.

Revealing the truth to the average Turks would then be a very shocking experience, because the vast majority of the population was convinced that all the party leaders and members had undeniable and impeccable credentials of Kemalism. This was exactly the problem; Ataturk never demanded for a Kemalist ideology to posthumously substitute him. The founder of Modern Turkey wanted his successors to continue having the same perception that he had, deploying the same methods that he did, developing the same approaches that he exemplified, and carrying out the same practices that he introduced and indicated as correct.  

Even more ridiculous were the results of the fake elections of 2002. If Tansu Çiller (9.54%) and Mesut Yılmaz (5.13%), who had basically identical political programs, were united in one conservative party, they would surpass the 10% limit, enter the parliament, and prevent the Islamists from having majority. They would then form the next government, striking an alliance with Deniz Baykal (19.39%) as prime minister. This development would automatically place Turkey within the European Union, and this was exactly what several Western European countries did not want – not because of the fake pretext of Islamism (that they use now thanks to Erdogan’s unnecessary existence, and which did not exist at the time), but because they would lose their privileges, due to the simple fact that in such case the numbers would speak for themselves: UK, Poland and Turkey would destroy once for all the ominous ‘German-French axis’.

The Turkish general elections of 2002 were a shameful matter of unprecedented Western involvement, manipulation and machination; for the colonial targets  against Turkey to be easily achieved the entire Turkish political life was further multi-divided, and new parties appeared being generously subsidized by foreign embassies only for the fraudulent purpose of placing an Islamist government in Ankara.

Cem Uzan, a successful businessman (whose enterprises were later confiscated by the Islamists, following specific US-UK orders), launched a liberal party (7.25%) with the help of France; Ismail Cem, former Foreign Minister, formed his own party (fully financed by the CIA) and got 1.15%; Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu, a former MHP (Pan-Turkist) deputy (1991, 1995), who had already formed his party (Büyük Birlik Partisi–BBP; Great Unity Party) in 1993 with the help of some German international circles, was able to reach 1.02%, which was enough to force Devlet Banceli (Alparslan Türkeş’ successor and MHP leader) out of the parliament (because of his meager 8.36%), which was also due to the extreme political multi-division and to the participation of another, minor, Pan-Turkist party in the electoral fraud of 2002.

Thus, the stage was prepared for the next theatrical play, namely the false dilemma ‘Islamists vs. Kemalists’, which is nothing more than the Oriental version of the duel between ‘I Capuleti e i Montecchi’ (the Capulets and the Montagues). Deputies from all the political parties of today’s Turkey are idiotic enough to still believe that the founder of Turkey wanted to ‘please’ the French and the English and for this reason he ‘westernized’ the country. Only besotted and demented people can possibly believe this. Many brainless Kemalists support therefore various branches of pro-Western and Western ideologies only to deliberately express a sentimental reaction against the Islamists, and because they erroneously assume that the Islamists are anti-Western, whereas the Islamists are the very products and the true enfants gâtés of the Western colonial world. Some people would be ready to attempt to denigrate these pro-Westerners as ‘fake Kemalists’, but that is wrong indeed; all Kemalists are fake. The true supporters of Kemal Ataturk are those, who properly value without misinterpreting his example and comprehensively exemplify him in their own perceptions, approaches, methods, and practices.   

Pro-Western Kemalists are indeed the worst enemies of Kemal Ataturk’s legacy and example; they terribly distort the very words of the founder of Turkey. In this regard, the distinguished Prof. Erol Manisalı, widely considered as Turkey’s foremost Kemalist but in reality consisting in Turkey’s most genuine interpreter of Kemal Ataturk’s mindset, concepts, choices and decisions, reminded Ataturk’s true words to everyone in an excellent article that was recently published (1/12/2020)  in Turkey’s most acclaimed newspaper Cumhuriyet under the meaningful title “Erdoğan’ın ‘Avrupa çıkışı’nın arkası” (Behind Erdogan’s ‘European exit’). After a brief but very convincing analysis, the venerable academician made a sentence only to include a most crucial statement made back in the 1920s by Kemal Ataturk: «”İstikametimiz Avrupa değil, bilim ve çağdaş uygarlık değerleridir” dedi». («”Our destination is not Europe, but science and contemporary civilization values”, he said»).

Kemal Ataturk teaching the Roman alphabet in Constantinople, circa 1928. (Photo by Fotosearch/Getty Images).

Post WWII Europe abandoned the values of contemporary civilization and now, along with America, will get decomposed and disappear. It is high time for Turkey’s Kemalists to abandon their pseudo-ideology and to return to the true perceptions, approaches, methods, and practices of Kemal Ataturk, as enshrined in the 1923 Constitution. Otherwise, the theatrical play, i.e. the false dilemma ‘Islamists vs. Kemalists’ (Capulets vs. Montagues), will be performed in all its majestic tragedy. The vicious colonial propaganda, as per which the Turkish political life revolves around two poles, namely the Islamists and the Kemalists, is a poisonous lie; this is the poison, which at the end kills both, Romeo and Juliet.

Kemalists and Islamists have very little time left before they

– overwhelmingly break all negotiations with EU,

– unilaterally withdraw Turkey from NATO,

– immediately ensure full membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation,

– re-organize and rearm the Turkish army after the Chinese model,

– offer China sizable naval bases in the Mediterranean (Bodrum) and in the Black Sea (Iğneada, Demirköy, Kırklareli province),

– launch a nation-wide alternative to the global Internet (dubbed Turannet) in cooperation with China, Russia and Iran (projected to also include Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Pakistan),

– open ten (10) Chinese universities in Turkey and ten (10) Turkish universities in China, thus progressively making Chinese the first foreign language in Turkey, and

– turn the region of Kaş (Antalya province) into the Sea Route’s major harbor and trade hub in the Meduterranean for the New Silk Road (OBOR – One Belt One Road) project, and link it with the Balkan Peninsula via a new highway and a high speed railway through Denizli, Uşak, Balıkesir, a Çardak – Gelibolu underwater tunnel (Çanakkale Boğazı; ‘Strait of Çanakkale’), and Edirne. Re-orienting 21st c. Turkey toward the East, and more specifically China, is the only correct, new strategic choice that corresponds exactly to what Kemal Ataturk did before 100 years, when he re-oriented the Ottoman Empire toward the West, thus founding Modern Turkey. Turkey’s Drang nach Osten is the only magnificent project that would  truly be as groundbreaking and as world-shattering as Kemal Ataturk’s enduring legacy. Such a move will be the world’s terminal endgame changer. It will catapult Turkey to worldwide supremacy as one of the five main superpowers of tomorrow’s world, impose the Anatolian-Mesopotamian-Iranian-Turanian Cultural Heritage as the Epicenter of World History, force the Mankind to revolve around the New Silk Road, and terminate the corrupt, useless and barbarian Western World irrevocably.


Download the article in Word doc:




                  INTER-EXCHANGE ( IFIE ) 




The Muslim world is entirely disconnected from its own historical past, and today’s Muslims are totally ignorant of one another; Islamic Ages’ History, Sciences, Intuition, Spirituality, Mysticism, Literature, Wisdom, Philosophy, Arts, Architecture, Cosmology and World Conceptualization are absolutely unknown to school children of Muslim countries and definitely absent from their manuals.

Across all the countries of the Islamic world there is not one all-encompassing encyclopedia to duly cover and properly present the contents of the aforementioned Historical Islamic Heritage. Publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, reviews, radio programs, TV channels, and Internet portals are fully devoid of the subjects that constitute the essence of the Cultural and Spiritual Identity of all Muslims.

Historical, literary and philosophical texts of the Islamic Ages’ greatest historians, philosophers, authors, scholars and poets are either difficult to find or not translated in other languages so that Muslims from all over the world can access them. No driving force makes it necessary for Muslims to delve into their own common heritage (that stretches from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Siberia to Mozambique). Yet, this heritage is the only authentic form of Islamic Civilization that is saved down to our days – in striking contradiction with today’s ignorant sheikhs, idiotic imams, uneducated muftis, pseudo-theological schools, and their pseudo-doctrines and nonsensical, mostly heretic dogmas.

Instead of this,

a) fake theological dogmas (such as Political Islam or Wahhabism),

b) heretic theological systems (like those of Ahmed ibn Hanbal, Ahmed ibn Taimiyya and Muhammad Abdelwahhab),

c) grave and erroneous ideologization of historical past (by those who are totally ignorant of that past),

d) catastrophic politicization of misunderstood parts of the Historical Islamic Heritage (by those who aberrantly represent that heritage), and

e) locally adopted Western, racist, colonial, Orientalist premeditated distortion of World History (therefore involving extensive falsification of the History of Islamic Civilization and nefarious concealment of the overwhelming impact of the Ancient Oriental Civilizations on the formation of both, the Western and the Islamic, worlds) have condemned Muslims in Asia, Africa and Europe to identity loss, obscurantism, ignorance, misery and abject destitution.


Muslims all over the world in their cultural festivities, spiritual exercises, religious feasts and traditional way of life


Z8B-2336748 - © - Eric Lafforgue

Beja Tribe Men Dancing In Front Of The Khatmiyah Mosque At The Base Of The Taka Mountains, Kassala, Sudan

z Tuareg.jpg

z seiyun hadhramaut

zal baldah fest mukalla.jpg





zqashqai iran
















Pictures from among Muslims in Senegal, Hausa in Nigeria, Tuareg in Mali and Algeria, Hadhramaut, Beja in Sudan, Indonesia, Qashqai in Iran, Somalia, Ogaden, Tamil of the Dekkan (occupied by India), Turkey, Uzbekistan, Iran, Uighur (Eastern Turkestan), Hazara of Afghanistan, and Circassians (Adyghe in the Russian Caucasus)


The only convicted criminal for the above described situation is the Colonial West in its totality: England, France, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Holland, Belgium, USA, Spain, Portugal and their dependencies. By means of military, economic, political, educational, academic, artistic, intellectual, cultural and religious interference, the aforementioned tyrannical, barbarian and inhuman states have done their best to incessantly enforce the above noted conditions that help only prolong mutual ignorance, educational darkness, identitarian crisis, spiritual-religious sterilization, economic withering, political discord and military conflict among all Muslim nations.

Irrespective of the nonsensical pretensions of the racist, colonial, criminal academies and universities of the Western countries, there are no Western universal values and consequently neither Asia nor Africa need any of them. The Muslims have had their own values that date back to the first millennium CE, being the depository of the Ancient Oriental universal values that had been extensively spelled out in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia, Iran, Central Asia, China and South Asia long before the marginal realms of Greece and Rome came to surface. The same is also valid for all Asiatics and Africans who are adepts of other religions, belonging to other civilizations.

In fact, the so-called Western universal values are not Western, simply because the West does not exist; the Modern Western world, as the foremost expression of cruelty, hatred, tyranny, barbarism and monstrosity, is only a vicious distortion of the Orient.

Today’s West is the world’s Sick Man, who pretends to be Healthy whereas at the same time he accuses the Healthy Man as Sick!

Representing the most excruciating form of putrefaction across World History, the paranoid Western pseudo-academia and bogus-intellectuals designate as “universal” their mental, intellectual and cultural contamination, thus intentionally infecting the rest of the world.

The so-called Western values are merely the parameters of their morbidness, the elements of their lawlessness, the dimensions of their evilness, and the epitome of their abhorrence of the “Other” – as made evident

a) in the massacres of Aztecs, Incas and other indigenous nations,

b) in the outrage of the Jesuit reductions,

c) in the criminality of the Scramble for Africa,

d) in the malignancy of the Opium Wars, and

e) in the perfidy and savagery by which the English and the French demolished the Ottoman, Iranian, Mughal and Chinese Empires that are now being reconstituted.

To reclaim their Historical Islamic Heritage, Muslims all over the world must reconnect with one another, thus totally disregarding, disrespecting and rejecting all things Western. The present paper is a suggestion as to just how Muslims can be comprehensively reconnected with one another and in the process eliminate all negative elements and parameters of their societies which are due to Western infiltration, propaganda and dictatorial imposition.

The present proposal was composed in early 2012, after several discussions that I had in Abu Dhabi (where I was living at the time) with friends originating from various Asiatic, African and European Muslim countries. It consists in the establishment of an international NGO or Foundation, which will undertake the enormous task of bridging the gap among Muslims,

a) rewriting historical, literary, geographical and other manuals,

b) making known the achievements of a Muslim nation to another Muslim nation and vice versa,

c) promoting vast bilateral exchanges among all Muslim countries,

d) materializing bilingual editions of reciprocally unknown authors,

e) organizing seminars and other activities to bring Muslims from all countries close to one another, and

f) popularizing the historical heritage of one Muslim nation among another – and vice versa.

The proposal is briefly outlined (less than 1500 words) and several sections only indicated; it serves for further brainstorming and discussion among educated and cultured Muslims, who have not fallen victims of Western propaganda, materialism, evolutionism, and consumerism. The present introduction was written on 20th July 2020 in Luxor, Thebes of Upper Egypt.


The true, historical Islam remains unknown to today’s Muslims because of their criminal governments that are exclusively made of stooges of the Western colonial gangsters; the following pictures offer only a minimal idea of what today’s Muslims are unaware, although they are the only heirs. 
















                  INTER-EXCHANGE ( IFIE )


General Scope of Languages

International Languages

Chinese, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Italian, English, French

1. Major working languages


Arabic, Azeri, Farsi, Urdu, Bengali, Malay, Bahasa, Uzbek, Kazakh, Turkmen, Uyghur, Kyrgyz – 12


Turkish, Bosnian, Albanian – 3


Berber (Amazigh), Hausa, Yoruba, Temne, Mende, Fulani, Somali, Oromo – 8

2. Secondary working languages


Tatar, Bashkir, Avar, Chechen, Circassian, Kurmanji, Zaza, Sorani, Gorani, Tajik, Dari, Hazaragi, Aimaq, Sindhi, Punjabi, Baloch, Pashto, Saraiki, Marathi, Gujarati, Kutchi, Qashqai, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya – 27


Tuareg, Wolof, Hadiya, Afar, Beja, Swahili – 6


TOTAL: 56 languages   



1. Educational Committee (E.C.)

2. Institute of Muslims’ Languages (IML)

3. Translation Dept (T-IFIE)

4. College of Islamic Humanities and Sciences (CIHS)

5. Seminars

6. Conferences

7. Congresses

8. Library-Archives

9. Publications

10. Organized cultural travels




Educational Committee (E.C.) – 49 members

International Languages

Russian, Chinese, English, French

Members: one native speaker as per languages below

Arabic, Azeri, Farsi, Urdu, Bengali, Malay, Bahasa, Uzbek, Kazakh, Turkmen, Uyghur, Kyrgyz, Tatar, Bashkir, Avar, Chechen, Circassian, Tajik, Hazaragi, Aimaq, Sindhi, Punjabi, Baloch, Pashto, Saraiki, Marathi, Gujarati, Kutchi, Qashqai, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya – 34

Turkish, Bosnian, Albanian – 3

Berber (Amazigh), Tuareg, Hausa, Yoruba, Temne, Mende, Fulani, Wolof, Afar, Somali, Oromo, Swahili – 12


Circles of Tasks

A. Primary and Secondary Education Manuals for Muslims across the Earth

1- Collection of manuals of Language, Literature, History, Geography, Philosophy and Religion, used in the all the levels of Primary and Secondary Education in all countries with indigenous Muslim populations in Asia, Africa and Europe

Approximation: ca. 6 manuals x 12 years – 70 manuals per native language x 56 native languages: 3900 manuals

Plus: Manuals in Arabic used across the 22 member states of the Arab League (70 x 21 / 21+1): 1400 manuals

Theoretical total: ca. 5300 manuals – there may be many missing, particularly because of assimilation practices in India and Africa

2- List of native languages of Muslims who are not offered Primary and Secondary Education in their native languages

3- Selection of translators tasked to prepare draft translations to help the Educational Committee members in their target as per below. Total: 56 translators

4- Study of the manuals collected, identification of errors, oversights, inaccuracies and falsifications. Prioritization // Work carried out in successive E.C. meetings

5- List of data pertaining to worldwide Muslims’ Languages, Literatures, History, Geography, Philosophy and Religion that have to be incorporated into the manuals of all the Muslims across the Earth // Work carried out in successive E.C. lectures – at the rate of 5 lectures per E.C. member, 250 lectures in total

6- Planning of manuals to be re-written (inv. text and photographical documentation) – in the light of above point 5 // Work carried out in successive E.C. meetings

7- Planning of manuals to be written for the first time (inv. text and photographical documentation) – in the light of above point 5 // Work carried out in successive E.C. meetings

8- Selection of native writers, preferentially secondary education teachers in their respective countries, who will attend specialized courses offered by E.C. members and geared to facilitate them in their task of writing the ascribed manuals

Approximation: 3900 manuals to be written in 56 native languages, 70 manuals per native language, 7 writers per language, Total: ca. 400 writers

9- Schedule for the elaboration of the above listed manuals, up to completion

10 A- Uniformity control of the written manuals as per subject and levels – to be carried out by E.C. members

10 B- Publication, distribution, online uploading

B. Anti-analphabetism campaigns

C. Organization of cultural inter-exchange seminars in various countries, featuring another Muslim country’s heritage in the local language – progressively covering all the other major working languages (first stage) and minor working languages (second stage).


Presentation Uzbekistan in Nigeria

Presentation Mali in India

Presentation Oromo in Kazakhstan

Each inter-exchange featuring photographic exhibition, small book fair, and distribution of published manuals and other informative material (flyers and brochures in the local language)

Suggested rhythm at the beginning: 1 seminar per month

D. Preparation of cultural inter-exchange documentaries, featuring one Muslim country’s heritage in all the other major working languages (first stage) and minor working languages (second stage)

E. Launching of Radio – TV channel


F. Launching of regional branches – that will cooperate at the local level with the cultural sections of the embassies concerned.


IFIE branch in Turkey – launched with first targets the presentation of Senegal, Somalia, Sudan and Malaysia in Turkey

It will involve courses of Language (Wolof, Somali, and Malay), Literature, Art, History, Architecture, Religion and Cultural Heritage, diffusion of manuals, promotion of translation studies and activities (Wolof / Turkish, Turkish / Wolof, Somali / Turkish, Turkish / Somali, Malay / Turkish, Turkish / Malay)

After the launching of a regional branch, all above activities B, C, and D are entrusted from the headquarters to the regional branch.


2. Institute of Muslims’ Languages (IML)

Initially run by the E.C. – at a later stage, by own board

The launching stage will cover the major working languages (23 in total), namely Arabic, Azeri, Farsi, Urdu, Bengali, Malay, Bahasa, Uzbek, Kazakh, Turkmen, Uyghur, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Bosnian, Albanian, Berber (Amazigh), Hausa, Yoruba, Temne, Mende, Fulani, Somali, and Oromo.

Intensive daily courses for 23 languages will be offered, each in a 2-year syllabus leading to professorate and translation. Internship will be offered to ca. 500 candidates selected by the E.C., ensuring that the correct number will be completed with at least one native speaker (of the major working languages) being enrolled in each course / syllabus. Certification

They will subsequently be transferred to the Translation Dept. for study and subsequent hiring.

At a second stage, the minor working languages will be covered as well.


3. Translation Dept (T-IFIE)

Initially run by the E.C. – at a later stage, by own board

The launching stage will cover the major working languages (23 in total), namely Arabic, Azeri, Farsi, Urdu, Bengali, Malay, Bahasa, Uzbek, Kazakh, Turkmen, Uyghur, Kyrgyz, Turkish, Bosnian, Albanian, Berber (Amazigh), Hausa, Yoruba, Temne, Mende, Fulani, Somali, and Oromo.

Intensive daily courses for 23 languages will be offered to all those who completed successfully the 2-year syllabus in the IML. The syllabus will be completed in one year, and will offer translator position to those who terminate successfully.

Translation projects will involve all major literary, philosophical, scientific, and religious works of the Islamic Civilization Ages and modern masterpieces of Literature in the major working languages.

As the project’s main target is Muslim inter-exchange, minor importance will be given to propagation of Islamic culture outside the Islamic world. However, translations to Russian, Chinese, Spanish and Portuguese will also be undertaken, at a limited scale.

At a second stage, the minor working languages will be covered as well.


4. College of Islamic Humanities and Sciences (CIHS)

Courses mentioned here are unrelated to those referred to in above parts 1.A.5, 1.A.8, 1.F, 2 and 3.

Interdisciplinary 4-year curriculum in Islamic Humanities and Sciences leading to Graduation (a total of 28 subjects)

Offered to selected candidates from diverse backgrounds, willing to specialize in non native environments

Enrollment prerequisites: at least two IML Certifications in languages from different regions, and two international languages

Parallel linguistic obligations: learning two languages among the following: Chinese, Russian, Spanish, and German

Promotion of research in Islamic sciences, mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, natural sciences, geography – cartography, and music; support to publications of manuscripts; focus on Social Anthropology, oral traditions, dancing and traditional medicine

At a later stage: postgraduate, doctoral, and postdoctoral degrees



5. Seminars

Organized (1-, 2-, 3- or 4-week duration) seminars offered to

– selected Muslim academics worldwide who could later be potentially employed in CIHS

– selected Muslim schoolteachers from backgrounds different than the seminar proposed, who could later join projects 1F or 2

– selected Muslim diplomats and public functionaries

– selected Muslim businessmen

– selected Muslim artists

– selected Muslim imams

Seminars will promote increased inter-exchange and mutual understanding in view of further interaction in diverse sectors, public administration to economy to arts to education.


6. Conferences

Open conferences and lectures for the general public


7. Congresses

Annual academic congresses


8. Library-Archives

Formation of an Inter-disciplinary Islamic library, enriched with copies of archives from various Muslim countries, academic journals, audio documentation specializing in cultural traditions

9. Publications

This sector of activities covers the needs of the above mentioned points 1.A.10, 1.C, 3, 6 and 7, plus own schedule. Bookshops are associated to this field, either in the headquarters or the branches.

10. Organized cultural travels, expeditions and explorations   


Download the proposal in Word doc:


Sudan, Ethiopia, Abyssinia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen and the Anti-African Plans of the Colonial Orientalists and of their local stooges

What follows is my response to a Somali friend who asked me about various aspects of the colonial distortion of African History with focus on the Horn Region, the historical background of the ethnic and culture divide between Semitic Abyssinia and Cushitic Ethiopia, and the ensuing benefits for the colonial powers France, England and America. The unprecedented affair of historical name usurpation by Abyssinia (‘Ethiopia’ is the historical name of Sudan – not of Abyssinia) brings into the picture Sudan, Africa’s greatest land and possible anti-colonial locomotive, which was continually, systematically and efficiently targeted by the colonial powers with the evil theories of Pan-Arabism and Islamism.

Answer to a Somali friend about Colonial Distortion of African History

Dear Mohamed,

Thank you for your questions and apologies for my late response!

I don’t know to what exactly you are referring by mentioning the “Amhara distortion of Ethiopia’s and Horn of Africa region’s History”. This sentence is not clear and perhaps you misunderstood parts of an article of mine.

The Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians did not “distort” any region’s or country’s History. They simply had their own version of world view, their own eschatology, their historical tradition, which was a forgery of course, and their expansionist plans. That’s one point.

A totally different point is the Western falsification of the World History, which started in parts of Western Europe as early as 1500, and after being tyrannically and deceitfully imposed there, it was ‘exported’ worldwide by means of colonization, modernization and globalization.

These two issues were two initially unrelated developments that one needs to first study per se (independently); only at a later stage the two developments converged. The point of conversion was surely the period from the middle of the 19th c. to the middle of the 20th c. when the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian rulers adjusted their visions and world views to the Western historical forgery and established a link with the Western plans for globalization, however managing to keep their tyranny far and almost cut off (if possible intact) from the rest of the world, because they did not agree with various elements of the Westernization process. By this, I mean that the world-known situation of underdevelopment that still characterizes Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) today was a very conscious decision of the Abyssinian rulers (be they monarchical, Third World communist or pseudo-republican) of the country over the past 70-140 years.



I. Abyssinia re-baptized as ‘Ethiopia’: a French colonial concept and decision


However, it was not an Abyssinian decision to re-baptize the country as “Ethiopia”; this was a Western plan that Haile Selassie only followed and implemented locally. Your question reminds me of the telephone call of an Australia-based Oromo friend of mine back in April 2007.

This long telephone call resulted in an article that I then published under the title “Ethiopia: a Panacea for Tyrants, a Stiletto in Colonial Hands” (27th April 2007) in AfroArticles, Buzzle and American Chronicle; that article was extensively republished at the time, but I think that by now it is not anymore available online. So, I promise you now that I will do my best to re-upload it within the next few days.

In that article, I expanded on this issue; it was my former professor of Egyptology in Paris (from 1978 until 1981), Jean Leclant (1920-2011 / read his curriculum in brief here:, who convinced his personal friend Haile Selassie to officially rename “Abyssinia” as “Ethiopia”.

When events of such importance take place, one has to automatically understand that they don’t reflect the innovative ideas of a young Egyptologist (who was also fluent in Ge’ez), but constituted deep colonial state machinations and evil conspiracies.

It may sound strange to you, but the real reason of re-baptizing Abyssinia with the historical name that describes Sudan (something that was well-known to Leclant) has more to do with Sudan itself, and less with Abyssinia.

Basically, it has to do with the general and vast falsehood that colonial diplomats, Orientalist academics, and statesmen diffuse and impose worldwide as “World History”; it is only a small piece in an entire mosaic.

When Leclant was assigned the task (following earlier diplomatic contacts between the French ambassador and Haile Selassie) to set up the Service of Antiquities in Abyssinia (: Fake Ethiopia), another French scholar, Jean Vercoutter (1911-2000, so 9 years older than Leclant) was tasked (following earlier agreements between the French and the English diplomats at Khartoum) to establish the Service of Antiquities in Sudan (when that country became independent).



II. Sudan, the only true Ethiopia: the ultimate target of the criminal colonial Orientalists in the middle 1950s

What the French colonials (who are the main standard bearers of the worldwide colonial historiography and of all the ensuing fallacies and distortions) wanted to achieve was this: they wanted to disconnect Sudan from

– its own past and 5000-year old heritage,

– its diverse and multifaceted historical tradition,

– its true national name,

– its African cultural identity, and – above all –

– the enormous perspectives that the historical reality de facto offers to Sudan at the academic, educational, intellectual, cultural, political, regional and international levels.

In other words, they wanted to prevent Africa’s largest country from rising to political, economic, academic, intellectual and geostrategic supremacy, which would be very easy, following a proper nation-building effort, which would involve a genuine, historical name for the country and a real, clear linguistic-cultural identity.

Sudan is the only country that has historical right to the name of Ethiopia. And Leclant knew this very well because his thesis concerned the historical period of the 8th and the 7th c. BCE, when first Upper (: Southern) Egypt and then Lower (: Northern) Egypt were under Cushitic / Ethiopian, i.e. Sudanese control. This development occurred because the Egyptian priesthood of Amun at Thebes (Luxor) wanted to use the Napata (today’s Karima)-based Kings of Cush (Kas in Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics) in its clash with the Heliopolitan priesthood of Ra, which was based in the area of today’s Cairo and supported by Berber princes of the African North-Northwest (spanning across the area of today’s NW Egypt, Libya and the African Atlas).

The Egyptian Hieroglyphic term ‘Kas’ (also used among the Cushites of Ancient Sudan – Ethiopia for their own land, country and kingdom) was translated as Mat Kusi in Assyrian-Babylonian and as Cush in Ancient Hebrew; it was the equivalent of the Ancient Greek term ‘Ethiopia’, and we know this not only because there are Ancient Greek historical references to the state immediately south of Egypt as ‘Ethiopia’, but also because in the Septuagint Ancient Greek translation (3rd c. BCE) of the Hebrew Bible the terms ‘Cush’ and ‘Ethiopia’ are used in Ancient Greek interchangeably.


napata 1.jpg

el kurru


Jebel Barkal (the holy mountain of Amun of Napata, venerated by the Ancient Cushites-Ethiopians of Sudan and by the Ancient Hamites of Kemet-Egypt) at the outskirts of Napata (today’s Karima) and the pyramids of the Cushitic Qore (: Kings) of the 8th-5th c. BCE (first two pictures); El Kurru pyramids near Karima (third picture); Nuri pyramids on the other bank of the Nile, opposite Karima and near Marawi (fourth picture) 

At this point, it is important to add that first, the territory of Ancient Cush with either Napata or Meroe as capital never encompassed lands of Abyssinia, and second, there was never a significant state located in the area of Abyssinia before Axum; and Axum rose to power only in the 4th c. CE.

Now, you may ask me what would be the result of a right nation building process carried out in Sudan in the late 1950s and the 1960s. This would be astonishing, but few people can now comprehend what great developments for the entire African continent the evil colonial fallacy of the French managed to avert.


meroe 1



meroe map.jpg


Meroe and its pyramids represent a later phase of Ancient Sudanese, i.e. Ethiopian – Cushitic Civilization (4th c. BCE – 4th c. CE), which is totally unrelated to Abyssinia (today’s Fake Ethiopia)



III. What would happen if Sudan did not fall victim of Pan-Arabism, Nasserism and Islamism?


First, the Sudan would not be plunged in the Arab Nationalist (or Pan-Arabic) fallacy that absorbed all the resources of the victimized countries, which accepted this colonial Orientalist distortion and, after losing their true national identities, were plunged into disastrous wars, civil strives, severe oppression, genocides (like Darfur), and choleric processes of linguistic Arabization and pseudo-religious Islamization.

There is not even one drop of Arab blood in any Sudanese citizen’s veins. The country accepted Islam at a later age and without any sort of invasion. This is also true for Upper Egypt; Sohag, Qena, Luxor and Aswan do not have an Islamic past that exceeds 1100 years. Iberia and North India, Central Asia and Sicily were under Islamic rule, Constantinople was attacked by Islamic armies, but Luxor and Aswan were calm and pious Christian cities of the Kingdom of Nobatia that had capital at Faras, near Abu Simbel.

The fallacious Arab identity of a genuinely non-Arab country like Sudan alienated the quasi-totality of the African nations gathered within the colonial structure under a fake name and a monstrous identity. All these ancient and noble African nations did not need to either learn the fabricated, fake modern pseudo-language that is called ‘Modern Arabic’ or to become Muslim.

There were already enough Muslims in the Sudan, from the Furis (of Darfur) to the Nubians to the Beja to the Berta; modern Sudan’s most illustrious anti-colonial exploits and heroic battles were undertaken by Muslims. First Sudan and the noble leader of Muhammad Ahmad the Mahdi stood against the Anglo-French colonial cholera and died fighting to avert Africa’s colonization. Quranic Arabic was their religious language and it was wonderful like that. These Muslims did not have major clashes with the non-Muslims of various adjacent regions. Only within the abnormal and inhuman frame of the vicious, Satanic colonial rule, all African nations were oppressed and all Africans started fighting against one another.




axum map

Axum, the capital of Ancient Abyssinia during pre-Christian and Christian (4th – 7th c. CE); Abyssinians spoke and wrote Ge’ez, which remains until today the religious language of the Modern Abyssinians, i.e. the Amhara and Tigray. Abyssinians are Yemenites who crossed the Red Sea and settled in Africa as late as the 2nd half of the 1st millennium BCE. The famous stelae of Axum testify to Axum’s pre-Christian civilization and date back to the first centuries of the Christian Era.



IV. What a true nation-building would mean for Sudan, rightfully named ‘Ethiopia’


With Ethiopia as national name, Sudan would give all its citizens the true portion of historical heritage and antiquity that belongs to them and they would all find elements of their culture, spirituality, faith and world view in the Ancient Cushitic and Meroitic past. Learning that Napata (today’s Karima) was already a holy place for the Ancient Egyptians, all Modern Sudanese would grasp an idea of the greatness of their land and of the splendor of the past that belongs to them – and not to the colonial gangsters who appear under the evil masks of Orientalists, archaeologists, epigraphists, Africanists, linguists, ethnographers, philologists and historians, only to

– minimize the African past,

– conceal its cataclysmic impact on the formation of civilization on European soil, and

– subordinate it to the racist fallacy of Hellenism, Greco-Roman civilization, and Euro-barbarianism.

With Ethiopia as national name, all Modern Sudanese would become proud of their civilization and of its radiation. In striking contrast with the colonially corrupt, idiotic and worthless Modern Egyptians, who have been stupidly selling their own antiquities for 222 years, Modern Sudanese would undertake the research of their past, the exploration of their antiquities, the decipherment of their ancient writing systems, and the reassessment of their diachronic role in World History at a national, sovereign level, finding the true, non-colonial partners for these purposes.

Second, because of the absence of the above, a true nation-building effort would take place and, as a consequence, today’s Sudanese would be all fully conscious of

a- their Cushitic – Ethiopian historical and cultural heritage

b- their Ancient History, as it is recorded in Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and in Meroitic hieroglyphic and cursive writing systems

c- their ethnic, national, cultural, historical and spiritual interconnection with the Oromos and the other subjugated Cushitic nations of Abyssinia

d- their Christian Nobatian, Makurian and Alodian History, as it is recorded in Coptic, Old Nubian and Makurian writing systems

e- their Islamic African History that is totally unrelated to Arab presence

f- their pro-eminent role across the trade routes of the Antiquity and the Islamic Ages, when the Historical Ethiopia (i.e. Sudan) linked

– Egypt with Sahara and the Western African world,

– the Mediterranean world with the Horn of Africa region, and

– almost all the African Muslims with the three cities of Islamic Pilgrimage, namely Mecca, Madina and Al Quds ash Sherif (Jerusalem).

ancient sudan map.png





V. Regional and international consequences of a true nation-building in Sudan, rightfully named ‘Ethiopia’


Third, because of the above, Sudan would

a- help dissolve the criminal colonial state of Abyssinia, by incorporating Oromia into Sudan-Ethiopia and by making Afaan Oromo the official language of the new,  magnificent African super-state

b- help form numerous independent nations on parts of Sudan’s soil, namely among the Bejas in the East, in Darfur, in Kordofan, and in the South – when the Westerners were not there to fuel rebellion against Pan-Arabist Khartoum that they (: the Western colonials) fabricated in the first place

c- help establish numerous independent nations on parts of the criminal colonial state of Abyssinia, namely Afar, Ogaden, Sidama, Hadiya, Kaffa, Kambata, Shekacho, Wolayita, Agaw, Nuer, Anuak, Berta, etc. whereby every nation would have their own language as official

d- help dissolve the filthy colonial fabrication of Djibouti, a pseudo-state created by the criminal, murderous gangsters of France, and in the process help Afar nation pull together all parts of their nation and Isa tribe merge with the other Somalis

e- strike an alliance with the Eastern Cushitic nation of Somalia in order to impose a genuine, anti-colonial, African Order across Africa, which would bring forth the dissolution of fake colonial states whereby many different historical nations are oppressed by the filthy nation or tribe that had previously been the lackeys of their colonial masters, like the Kikuyu in Kenya

f- launch an African educational, academic system in total refutation of the Western Orientalism, Hellenism, ‘Greco-Roman Civilization’ and fake Africanism, and in total rejection of the racist, Eurocentric version of World History,

– by highlighting the superiority of Ancient African civilizations (Egyptian, Cushitic-Meroitic, Carthaginian-Berber) over Ancient Greece and Rome,

– by establishing the correct links between the Ancient African civilizations and the Ancient Oriental civilizations (Sumerian, Assyrian-Babylonian, Hurrian, Hittite-Anatolian, Canaanite-Phoenician, and Iranian),

– by meticulously examining and widely publicizing the multifaceted, overwhelming African cultural, religious, spiritual, artistic, literary and linguistic impact on Ancient and Medieval Europe


Iseum Campense

Iseum Campense Rome.jpg

Black Egyptian high priests were initiating White Romans into the mysteries of the Ancient Egyptian divine concept of Isis (Aset in Egyptian Hieroglyphics); hundreds of temples of Isis (Iseum – Isea in Latin) have been excavated across Europe but this evidence of absolute African Egyptian impact on European civilization remains hidden to Europeans and others – in order not to function as a rejection of the still prevalent, racist pseudo-historical model of ‘Hellenism’ and Greco-Roman civilization’. Iseum Campense, Rome


g- promote a system of cultural, academic, educational and intellectual interconnection among all African nations, imposing

– the immediate obliteration of the colonial languages, English and French, across the continent,

– the prohibition of these two languages from the primary, secondary and tertiary education of all African states, and

– their replacement by a system of all-African multilingualism, involving the major African languages,

h- destroy all fake pseudo-states that the colonial powers, France, England and America, produced over the past 222 years on African soil, notably Fake Egypt, Fake Morocco, etc. and help generate genuinely African nations instead.

What I am saying with the aforementioned brief diagram is that a non-Arab, non-colonial, genuinely African Sudan, named Ethiopia, in the middle 1950s should act as if having fully understood, assessed and capitalized on the historical conclusions of scholars like Martin Bernal (author of the venerated “Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization”, in three volumes: 1987, 1991, 2006) and Edward Said (author of the highly respected “Orientalism”, 1978). This aphorism of mine may sound as preposterous because these great opuses were published more than 20 or 30 years after Sudan proclaimed its independence.

However, all the constituent elements, the textual and archaeological evidence, which led the aforementioned scholars to their groundbreaking publications, were there already in 1956. As a matter of fact, all that an African scholar needed to do was

– study the historical sources and the archaeological material record

– identify the discrepancies between historical sources and colonial bibliography

– list a vast number of topics commonly shared among colonial scholars but hidden from the Western and worldwide public (readership)

– analyze the reasons of the unrepresentative selection of historical sources for educational – intellectual – cultural purposes, as carried out by colonial scholars

– examine the above through the question ‘qui bono’ and accurately specify the colonial intentions, and

– conclude about a) the racist, criminal, and inhuman motives of the colonial pseudo-academia and b) the ensuing benefit for the colonial powers and their false historical version.



VI. Anti-colonial struggle means total rejection of the colonial fallacy still diffused worldwide as ‘Word History’


A non-colonial, non-Arab Sudan, officially named Ethiopia, would of course demolish fundamental colonial myths and highlight concealed facts that constitute basic elements of today’s Western version of World History. The topic is as vast as an entire encyclopedia, but I will herewith offer few examples pertaining to Africa and the surrounding seas.

a- there is no such country as “Egypt” and there is no such thing as “Egyptian Civilization”. The country’s real historical name is Kemet, which means the ‘Black Land’ or ‘the Land of Black People’, and this is due to the fact that the Ancient Egyptians were both, dark brown and black. So, there was Kemetic or Kemetian Civilization. Today, a liberated, non-colonial country at the northeastern corner of the Black Continent must be called Kemet – not Egypt – at the international level. Egyptian politicians and statesmen accepting to name their country ‘Egypt’ at the international level are born slaves and constitute a most disreputable clique alien to the great history of that land.



kemet 2

Kemet written in hieroglyphic characters


b- the name ‘Egypt’, used by Egyptians, constitutes a colonial relic of the filthiest and most racist contents. The word originates from the Ancient Greek word Aigyptos, which is the Hellenization of the Ancient Egyptian term ‘Hwt Ka Ptah’, i.e. ‘the enclosure of the soul of Ptah’; Ptah was a marginal deity in Ancient Egypt, and the Ancient Egyptians would never accept to name their country after that deity of the polytheistic priesthood of Memphis. This is the first point against the use of the term. The second point is related to the fact that European and North American colonials view the use of this term as resulting from their cultural, political, academic and intellectual supremacy over colonized (since 1798) Modern ‘Egypt’.

c- Modern Egypt cannot be called “Egypt” at the international level for one extra, totally different, reason; the use of this name, which is totally alien and unknown to today’s average Egyptians, consists in an unprecedented colonial denigration and vulgar deprecation of the modern nation, which uses the name Masr to denote their identity. Assyrian-Babylonian of origin (Musur and Mat Masri, lit. ‘land of Egypt’), this name was diffused among Aramaeans and Hebrews, before being adopted among Arabs.

And notice the difference, if you please: the authorities of Myanmar managed to impose at the international level respect for their country’s name, which is the aforementioned, officially accepted, name and not the filthy, colonial parody of Burma that the English colonials used since the early colonial days. But the idiotic, colonial, Pan-Arabist rulers of Kemet / Masr from Nasser to Mubarak to Morsi never raised such a subject in an effort to always remain disgustingly servile and docile enough to please their colonial masters – the Satanic gangsters of France, England and America.

d- there is no such expanse of sea as “the Indian Ocean”; this is a fake term introduced by the English, Dutch, Portuguese and French colonials as late as the 16th c. In the Antiquity, the most commonly used term was “Red Sea” (in Ancient Greek: ‘Erythra Thalassa’); during the Roman and Arsacid / Sassanid times, this term denoted the seas that we call today ‘Persian Gulf’, ‘Red Sea’ and ‘Indian Ocean’. When Agatharchides writes in the 2nd c. BCE his treatise on the Red Sea (Geographi Graeci Minores), in the part of his work in which he describes the natural phenomenon due to which the sea was called ‘red’, he narrates an event happening in today’s coast of Hadhramaut or Mahra in SE Yemen.

e- if one wants to name the entire Afro-Asiatic expanse of sea after the national name of the first seafarers and navigators who, after studying the meteorological conditions, the winds and the oceanographic data of that sea, sailed across the ocean from the Horn of Africa region to today’s coast of Malabar, then one has to call the sea “Yemenite Ocean”. First, the Qataban Yemenites, with capital at Timna, established safe navigation from the Gulf of Aden to the Malabar coast where they established commercial relations with the local Dravidian (not Indian, not Indo-European) kingdoms as early as the middle of the first millennium BCE.

Qataban Yemenite thalassocracy across the Yemenite Ocean lasted many centuries and was matched with an early colonization of the East African coast where the Qatabanis intermingled with the local Ancient Somalis of the coast of Azania (from the Horn of Africa down to today’s Daressalaam in Tanzania). Qatabani supremacy was terminated when the Himyarite Yemenites and the Sabaean Yemenites made an alliance to vanquish Qataban and accumulate in their palaces the mythical treasures that used to be garnered at Timna. This happened ca. 115 BCE.


yemen marib


yemen marib 2

yemen himyar.jpg

Maps of Ancient Yemenite kingdoms and the monuments of Marib, capital of the Sabaean (Sheba) Kingdom. There is no link between the Biblical – Quranic Queen of Sheba, an exclusively Yemenite Queen, and the Makeda forgery of Kebra Negast. The Queen of Sheba was totally unrelated to Africa.


The Himyar – Sheba alliance was not as experienced as the Qatabanis seafarers; their heavy taxes were a problem for the last Ptolemies who were easy partners. After Octavian invaded Kemet (Egypt) and annexed the land of the Nile to the Roman Empire (30 BCE), the Romans proved to be difficult partners and in the year 25 BCE, Aelius Gallus, prefect of Egypt, undertook a maritime expedition against Yemen, which also involved several land expeditions. At the end, after many collateral damages, the Romans managed to destroy the main Yemenite port of call at Aden and thus force the Yemenites to cooperate with Rome and reduce the customs.

Yemenite thalassocracy across the Yemenite Ocean continued, evidently coordinated with the Roman imperial establishments at Egypt and Leuke Kome (NW coast of today’s Saudi Arabia), and it is well documented in historical texts like the Periplus of the Red (Erythraean) Sea, which was written by an Alexandrian Egyptian captain and merchant who traveled across the coastal regions from Suez to China at the times of the Roman Emperor Nero (so in the middle of the 1st c. CE). The same text describes the continuation of the Himyar-Sabaean colonization of Azania and prevalence across the seas. There have truly been found Roman coins in different archaeological sites across the Malabar coast where the kingdoms of Damirica, Nelkyndis, Cerobothra (Chera) and Pandya were located according to the Periplus of the Red (Erythraean) Sea.

But Yemenite traders and sailors used these coins while sailing across the Yemenite Ocean; and these kingdoms were all Dravidian – not Indian. And the Dravidians never demonstrated navigational skills, which is one more reason for which we cannot call this sea ‘Indian Ocean’, pretty much like we cannot call ‘India’ the cemetery of South Asiatic nations that the English colonials prepared for more than 100 years during their calamitous colonial presence there. ‘India’ is only the land around the Indus River, and this concerns only a minor part of the state which is nowadays fallaciously called with this name.



At the beginning of my response, I mentioned the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian world view, eschatology, and historical tradition. This relates to their famous historical book Kebra Negast, which was written in Ge’ez, their religious language down to our days. First written in Coptic, then translated to Arabic (early 13th c.), and last rendered in Ge’ez at the beginning of the 14th c., Kebra Negast is a historical forgery prepared by Amhara debteras (monks) only to justify their false pretensions to ancestry and to royalty and to prepare the ground for expansionism of apocalyptic and eschatological contents.

The disappearance of Islam, the common borders between Abyssinia and a Zionist state in the area of Palestine, the fallacious and unhistorical theory of Axum being the ‘New Zion’, and the fabrication of Menelik, nonexistent son of Solomon (Suleyman) and ‘Makeda’, the fake queen of Sheba (that kingdom was located only in Yemen, not in Africa), do not bode well with the future of Africa but are all some of the targets of the real authors of this forgery. All later Amhara and Tigray ‘prophecies’ about their expansion are repetitions of earlier material included in Kebra Negast. Somali, Sudanese and Egyptian (not to mention more) scholars are idiotic enough not to learn Ge’ez, not to study Kebra Negast and not to highlight the fallacious nature of the book that prepares the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians as followers or conscious slaves of the Antichrist (Masih al-Dajjal). But this is a totally different subject, as I already said.

Best regards,



Download the text in Word doc:

Sudan, Ethiopia, Abyssinia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen and the Anti-African Plans of the Colonial Orientalists

The Colonial Powers’ Most Ominous and Secret Evildoing: Cultural, Academic, and Educational Disconnection among all the Nations of the World

What follows is the publication of an exchange of email with a South Africa-based friend from Malawi whose interests cover all aspects of colonialism and colonially-imposed divisions, cultural alienation, and historical identity loss that the criminal colonial powers of France, England and America generated in Africa and worldwide.

———————- MY FRIEND’S FIRST EMAIL ————————

Hi Shamsaddin,

I can’t resist asking you these two questions:

It is true that Islam has its roots in Africa? Where is the Evidence (If Yes).

Who were the Ephraphites? I have noticed that the word is in the Jerusalem Bible but not in any other Bible. I know you are very conversant with the History of North Africa and the Middle East.

Kind regards,


———————- MY FIRST RESPONSE ————————————

Hi my dear friend.

Thank you for your questions!



I. The distortion of Ancient Oriental History as carried out by ignorant religious leaders


I start with your second point; you heard probably a mistaken pronunciation or you read the name misspelled.

It is Ephrath, so the people who live there are Ephrathites. Read this:

Every attempt to locate Ephrath outside Canaan is a distortion.

Bear in mind that «Ephrathite» is NOT a national name. It is an adjective formed out of a toponym: like ‘Berliner’ or ‘Parisian’ or ‘Muscovite’.

It is a most unimportant location in terms of Oriental History.

Anyone (as author) who focuses much on scarcely documented toponyms, instead of the main centers of the ancient world, like Nineveh, Assyria, Babylon, Thebes of Egypt, Heliopolis (Iwnw) and Memphis, Hattusas, Ugarit, Mari, Ebla, Kalhu, Persepolis, Byblus and Carthage, is most probably a forger.

In the cases of Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, you have hundreds of thousands of ancient texts that document all the details of those ancient civilizations.

The Ancient Hebrews and the Jews left few texts; the Bible is mostly unreliable and insignificant, and those who speak of it today, only misinterpret it for evil political reasons.

In any case, compared to the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Hittites, the Egyptians and the Iranians, the Ancient Hebrews were a marginal, impotent and worthless state.

Focusing on them, instead of studying the other, sizeable and leading empires of the Ancient Orient and Africa is as if someone today ignores everything about Germany, China, the US, Russia, India, etc. and focuses too much on Singapore! That’s ridiculous!



II. Two points about Islam’s presence in Africa


No, Islam does not have its roots in Africa but in Arabia – Asia.

But it depends on what you mean by saying «Islam».

As per the Islamic viewpoint (which is mostly forgotten by most of today’s Muslims), Islam was not first preached by Prophet Muhammad but by Adam, Enoch, Noah and all the early prophets.

Islam means submission to or contact with God.

The epitome of Islam is the belief in One God (monotheism).

Now, if you mean that there were pre-Islamic monotheistic faiths and religions in Africa, then yes!

There was «Islam» in Africa long before Prophet Muhammad.

Pharaoh Akhenaten abolished Theban polytheism and instituted Atenism, a monotheistic religion in the middle of the 14th c. BCE. Monotheistic hymns to Aten are found copied and pasted in the Hebrew Bible. Without Akhenaten, there would never be Moses.




———————— MY FRIEND’S SECOND EMAIL ——————-

Good Morning Shamsaddin,

Thank you for your response. You have now given me good reason to rather dig further into History when it comes to what has been fed to us by the colonialists. Now I understand what is meant by the Bible being copied from much older books, for example I have come across an Ancient Egyptian text that the Psalms were copied from. The analogy you have used of Singapore has given me a better perspective of what ancient and available records bear witness to. I really appreciate it.

And about Islam you have given me the best answer, especially when you illustrate that it was rather preached by Adam initially. It makes a lot of sense now because somebody told me that it means `submitting to God’ but I needed further elaboration.

It is such knowledge that I have no doubt will fill the generation gap or find the missing link if we search hard enough and eventually empower us towards a brighter future. I love the thought of the unknown possibilities.

Enjoy the rest of your day further,



———————— MY SECOND RESPONSE ——————–

My dear friend,

Hope you and your family are doing well, being of the best health!

Your response contains many points worthy highlighting.



III. Viewpoints, nationalist Greco-centric psychopaths, and my personal standpoint as attested across my publications


You certainly understand that everything hinges on viewpoints, i.e. on through how many angles you saw a topic. This is a vast issue that applies to everything.

What I said to you about the small Ancient Hebrew state, comparing it to immense, sophisticated and very advanced empires of Assyria, Babylonia, Egypt and Iran, I also said in Greece back in the middle 1980s about the tiny Ancient Greek states (the likes of Sparta, Thebes, Corinth and Athens) that constituted the barbaric periphery of the then known world. I triggered an overwhelming rage among the idiotic, nationalistic, chauvinistic people who are omnipresent across the entire political spectrum of that unfortunate and ill-fated state. They accused me of high treason!

Haha! Stupid!

One of those guys – I still remember – asked me exactly this: “if your opinions are these, you Dr. Megalommatis, how have you been degraded so much as to become a ….. White”?

Of course, I did not answer, but I really enjoy it when my opponents make so devilish comments.

I regret for having not kept record of his name so that I ask him back in 2015 when Greece collapsed financially: “if your opinions are these, you Mr. Greek, how have you been degraded so much as to become a ….. bankrupt and a beggar”?

I found it amusing, rewarding and sublime!

When evil people hate you and insult you, God sends you a message that you are on the correct path.

I remained the same during my entire 35-year long career, which started only after 11 years of graduate, postgraduate and doctoral studies in more than 10 universities of 7 different countries were completed.

I always tell the truth however unpleasant or hurting it may be; as I say, between my country and the truth, I always side with the truth.


IV. Religion, Theology, Politics, and my personal standpoint as attested across my publications


The same happens when it comes with my religious beliefs; I was born Christian Orthodox, I rejected (but did not hate) Christianity, I was a Greek citizen without religion for some years, and then I adhered to Islam. This was a spiritual path and every person has his own path.

If Islam was good for me, Buddhism may be better for another European, and the Waaqeffanna traditional Oromo religion is perhaps the path of a third person from Europe.

But the spiritual choice must never affect the standard orientation of the heart and of the mind toward Truth.

So, I reject many wrong points that today’s Muslims believe as “religion” whereas these points are a pure matter of historical developments first distorted and then popularized.

Today’s Muslims, Christians, Hindus and many others fail to see the limits between Spirituality, Moral, Religion, Theology, and Politics.

Politics is impermissible in Religion, sinister in Moral, and diabolical in Spirituality.

Theology may eventually match with politics, but Theology consists in the most disastrous distortion of Religion, in the most calamitous breach of Moral, and in total abandonment of Spirituality.

However, I must admit that today many people deliberately confuse Religion with Theology; but this is perfectly revelatory of the evilness of politics which must not exist among the faithful anytime anywhere.

There was not any politics among your ancestors before 300 years (thank God!), there was not any politics among the ancestors of Oromos before 400 years, there was not any politics among the Ancient Egyptians of the times of Nechao (whose fleet achieved the circumnavigation of Africa), there was not any politics among the Ancient Somalis of Punt (Horn of Africa) when Pharaoh Hatshepsut (the World History’s first queen) sent her fleet there before ca. 3500 years, there was not any politics among Christian Eastern Romans of the times of Justinian I, there was not any politics among the Iranians of the times of Shapur II, there was not any politics at the times of Harun al Rashid, the Abbasid Caliphate’s greatest emperor before 1200 years, and more importantly, there was not any politics around Muhammad, there was not any politics around Jesus, there was not any politics around Zoroaster, Buddha and Confucius, there was not any politics around Moses, and so on.

Politics is the evil tool of post-Renaissance world gangsters in their attempt to first corrupt and then eliminate the Mankind.

I say all this because many people believe that my texts are affected by the fact that I am a Muslim. That’s very wrong and absolutely untrue. Oromos are divided among Islam, Waaqeffanna and Christianity, but I explicitly support Waaqeffanna as the most genuine religious choice for all Oromos. On the other hand, through many articles, I demanded as early as 2004 and 2005 the formation of a Christian Aramaean state in parts of today’s Iraq and Syria to save Oriental Christianity; this did not happen and I am sure that you know what evildoing happened instead….

Recently, I republished a series of articles that I published in 2007-2010 in favor of Kosovo, its secession from Serbia, its national independence, and its international recognition. I did not support Kosovo and the Kosovars’ plead for National Sovereignty because of the coincidence that they are Muslims and I am a Muslim too! I supported them because this was historically right and morally correct. If you don’t use moral criteria while evaluating historical developments or when siding with today’s conflicts, you end up a wild animal in today’s jungle.

A Greek friend of mine from Georgia (in the Caucasus region) wrote to me to react against my articles and say that Kosovo became a narco-trade center and a hub of Islamists. Nonetheless! Because they made a very bad use of their freedom, this does not mean that they should not become independent. My friend’s observations were correct, but his remarks wrong. By the way, do you know one modern state that is not ruled by narco-gangsters? There may be few exceptions, but you know, always an exception reconfirms the rule!


1 Philae

Isis Temple at Philae Island, Egypt – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Iraq.

2 Nuri

Nuri Pyramids – Karima, Sudan – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Morocco.

3 Djenne Djenno

Djenne Mosque, Mali – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Somalia.


4 Ras Hafun 17 c mosque

Ras Hafun 17th c. Mosque, Somalia – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Sudan.

4 volubilis

Volubilis, Morocco – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Nigeria.

5 Queen Arwa mosque Jibla

Queen Arwa as-Sulayhi Mosque – Jibla, Yemen – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Egypt.

6 Dura Europos Sacrifice of Conon

The Sacrifice of Conon – Wall Painting of a Temple in Dura Europos, Syria – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Greece.  

7 Ancient wall of Zaria

7 Queen Amina of Zaria 1536-1566

The Ancient Wall of Zaria and the Muslim Queen Amina of Zaria (1536-1566) who led her armies at the battlefield – It is impossible to study about these topics in a university in Yemen.

8 Ajuraan Sultanate Ming China

Somali Ajuraan Sultanate and their relations with Ming China – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Turkey.  

Syrian Orthodox Monastery Mar Mattai, (St. Matthews Monastery) overlooking Mosul, Iraq, Middle East

Aramaean Mar Mattai Monastery – North of Mosul, Iraq – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Mexico.